Systematic and Nomenclatorial Notes on Some Taxa of Zabrini and Harpalini from the Palaearctic, Oriental and Australian Regions (Coleoptera: Carabidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Systematic and Nomenclatorial Notes on Some Taxa of Zabrini and Harpalini from the Palaearctic, Oriental and Australian Regions (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Proceedings of the Zoological Institute RAS Vol. 318, No. 3, 2014, рр. 252–267 УДК 595.762 SYSTEMATIC AND NOMENCLATORIAL NOTES ON SOME TAXA OF ZABRINI AND HARPALINI FROM THE PALAEARCTIC, ORIENTAL AND AUSTRALIAN REGIONS (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE) B.M. Kataev Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Emb. 1, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The paper deals with the taxonomy of some members of Zabrini and Harpalini based mainly on the examination of the type material. Harpalus indicus orientalis subsp. nov. is described from Myanmar, China, Vietnam and Laos. Notiobia (Anisotarsus) peratra (Sloane, 1920), originally described from Tasmania and the south-east of Australia within the genus Diaphoromerus Chaudoir, 1843, is redescribed. The following new synonyms are proposed: Amara abdominalis (Motschulsky, 1844) = Phobophorus paccatus Motschulsky, 1850, syn. nov.; Amara lamia Andrewes, 1924 = Trichotichnus ladakhensis Kirschenhofer, 1992, syn. nov.; Amathitis Zimmermann, 1832 = Phobophorus Motschulsky, 1850, syn. nov.; Chydaeus andrewesi szetschuanus Schauberger, 1932 = Ch. guangxiensis Ito, 2006, syn. nov.; Harpalomimetes fukiensis (Jedlička, 1957), comb. nov. = Kareya fukiensis Jedlička, 1957 = Harpalomimetes or- bicollis Ito, 1995, syn. nov.; Harpalus Latreille, 1802 = Licinoderus Sainte-Claire Deville, 1905 = Neoharpalus Mateu, 1954 = Baeticoharpalus Serrano et Lecina, 2009, syn. nov.; Harpalus politus Dejean, 1829 = H. eberlovi Berlov, 1996, syn. nov.; H. praticola Bates, 1891 = H. himalayicus Jedlička, 1966, syn. nov.; H. semipunctatus Dejean, 1829 = H. aes- culanus Pantel, 1888, syn. nov.; H. subcylindricus Dejean, 1829 = H. ambigenus Reiche, 1853, syn. nov.; Notiobia pera- tra (Sloane, 1920) = Chydaeus queenslandicus Baehr, 2004, syn. nov. Lectotypes are designated for Diaphoromerus perater Sloane, 1920; Harpalus indicus Bates, 1891; and H. semipunctatus Dejean, 1829. Key words: Amara, Australian Region, Chydaeus, Coleoptera, ground beetles, Harpalini, Harpalomimetes, Harpalus, new combination, new subspecies, new synonyms, Palaearctic, Oriental Region, taxonomy, Zabrini ЗАМЕЧАНИЯ ПО СИСТЕМАТИКЕ И НОМЕНКЛАТУРЕ ЖУЖЕЛИЦ ТРИБ ZABRINI И HARPALINI ПАЛЕАРКТИКИ, ОРИЕНТАЛЬНОЙ ОБЛАСТИ И АВСТРАЛИИ (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE) Б.М. Катаев Зоологический институт Российской академии наук, Университетская наб. 1, 199034 Санкт-Петербург, Россия; e-mail: [email protected] РЕЗЮМЕ В статье приводятся замечания по систематике и номенклатуре жужелиц триб Zabrini и Harpalini, осно- ванные главным образом на изучении типового материала. Описан Harpalus indicus orientalis subsp. nov. из Мьянмы, Китая, Вьетнама и Лаоса. Переописан вид Notiobia (Anisotarsus) peratra (Sloane, 1920), первоначаль- но описанный в роде Diaphoromerus Chaudoir, 1843 из Тасмании и юго-восточной Австралии. Предложены следующие новые синонимы: Amara abdominalis (Motschulsky, 1844) = Phobophorus paccatus Motschulsky, 1850, syn. nov.; Amara lamia Andrewes, 1924 = Trichotichnus ladakhensis Kirschenhofer, 1992, syn. nov.; Amathitis Zimmermann, 1832 = Phobophorus Motschulsky, 1850, syn. nov.; Chydaeus andrewesi szetschuanus Schauberger, 1932 = Ch. guangxiensis Ito, 2006, syn. nov.; Harpalomimetes fukiensis (Jedlička, 1957), comb. nov. = Kareya fukiensis Systematic and nomenclatorial notes on Zabrini and Harpalini 253 Jedlička, 1957 = Harpalomimetes orbicollis Ito, 1995, syn. nov.; Harpalus Latreille, 1802 = Licinoderus Sainte-Claire Deville, 1905 = Neoharpalus Mateu, 1954 = Baeticoharpalus Serrano et Lecina, 2009, syn. nov.; Harpalus politus Dejean, 1829 = H. eberlovi Berlov, 1996, syn. nov.; H. praticola Bates, 1891 = H. himalayicus Jedlička, 1966, syn. nov.; H. semipunctatus Dejean, 1829 = H. aesculanus Pantel, 1888: 223, syn. nov.; H. subcylindricus Dejean, 1829 = H. ambigenus Reiche, 1853: XXX, syn. nov; Notiobia peratra (Sloane, 1920) = Chydaeus queenslandicus Baehr, 2004, syn. nov. Обозначены лектотипы для Diaphoromerus perater Sloane, 1920; Harpalus indicus Bates, 1891 и H. semipunctatus Dejean, 1829. Ключевые слова: Amara, Австралия, Chydaeus, Coleoptera, жужелицы, Harpalini, Harpalomimetes, Harpalus, но- вая комбинация, новый подвид, новые синонимы, Палеарктика, Ориентальная область, таксономия, Zabrini INTRODUCTION Zoologische Staatssammlung, München, Germany; cOB, Coll. O.E. Berlov, Irkutsk, Russia; cWR, Coll. The paper comprises systematic and nomenclato- D.W. Wrase, Berlin, Germany; cZRS, Coll. V. Zieris, rial notes on some taxa of ground beetles belong- Pardubice, Czech Republic. ing to the tribes Zabrini and Harpalini from the Measurements were taken as follows: body length Palaearctic, Oriental and Australian regions, based (L), measured from the anterior margin of the clypeus mainly on the examination of the type material. A to the elytral apex; width of head, measured as the new subspecies of Harpalus indicus Bates, 1891 is maximum linear distance across the head, including also described from Myanmar, China (Yunnan, Tai- the compound eyes (HWmax), and as the minimum wan), Vietnam and Laos. linear distance across the neck constriction just be- hind the eyes (HWmin); length of pronotum (PL), MATERIAL AND METHODS measured along its median line; length of elytra (EL), measured from the basal border in the scutellar re- gion to the apex of the sutural angle; maximum width The following abbreviations are used for the of pronotum (PWmax) and of elytra (EW), both depositories of the specimens examined: CAS, Cali- measured at their broadest point; minimum width fornia Academy of Sciences, U.S.A.; IOZ, Institute of pronotum (PWmin), measured at its narrowest of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, point near the hind angles; length and width of me- China; FMNH, The Field Museum of Natural His- tepisterna, measured along their inner and anterior tory, Chicago, USA; MNHN, Muséum National margins, respectively. All measurements were made d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France; MPU, Moscow under the stereobinocular microscope MBS–10 us- Pedagogical University, Moscow, Russia; NHMW, ing an ocular-micrometer. Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna, Austria; NME, Naturkundemuseum Erfurt, Germany; NMP, Nation- al Museum Prague, Czech Republic; NRM, Naturhis- SYSTEMATICS toriska Riksmuseet (Natural History Museum), Stockholm, Sweden; OÖLL, Oberösterreichisches Tribe Zabrini Bonelli, 1810 Landesmuseum, Linz, Austria; SAM, South Austra- Genus Amara Bonelli, 1810 lian Museum, Adelaide, Australia; TMB, Természet- Amara (Cumeres) lamia Andrewes, 1924 tudományi Múzeum, Budapest, Hungary; ZIN, Zoo- logical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia; ZMM, Zoological Museum, Mos- Trichotichnus (s. str.) ladakhensis Kirschenhofer, 1992: 36 syn. nov. cow, Russia; ZMUN, Zoological Museum, University of Oslo, Norway; ZSM, Zoologische Staatssammlung Type material. Paratypes of Trichotichnus la- München, Germany; cSCI, Coll. R. Sciaky, Milano, dakhensis: 1 male, “India, J. ca K., Ladakh, 5000– Italy; cGRK, Coll. V. Gurko, Chernovtsy, Ukraine; 5200 m, 23.VII.–2.VIII.1984, Nimaling, H.A. Cocak, cHNZ, Coll. W. Heinz, Schwanfeld, Germany; R. Vis.”, “Paratypus”, “Trichotichnus ladakhensis m., cMB – the working collection of M. Baehr at the det. Kirschenhofer” (NHMW); 1 male, “M”, “India, 254 B.M. Kataev Ladakh, Nimaling Valley, 27.VII.1984, 5200 m, leg. Motschulsky, 1850, syn. nov. Based on the label data H.A. Coene”, “Paratypus”, “Trichotichnus ladakhensis of the holotype, the type locality of Ph. paccatus is n. sp., det. Kirschenhofer” (NHMW); 1 female, same “Elisabethpol” (= Gandzha), Azerbajan, not “Georg. data, but labelled “F” instead of “M” (NHMW). [ia] m.[eridionalis]” as probably erroneously cited by Remarks. Trichotichnus (s. str.) ladakhensis was Motschulsky (1850). described from the series (12 specimens) collected in Nimalina Valley, 5200 m, Ladakh, India. Examination Tribe Harpalini Bonelli, 1810 of the paratypes deposited in NHMW revealed the Genus Notiobia Perty, 1830 identity of this taxon with Amara (Cumeres) lamia, a member of the tribe Zabrini. This species is endemic Notiobia (Anisotarsus) peratra (Sloane, 1920) to the region of Ladakh, Kashmir (Hieke 1988, 2003). (Figs 1–9) Thus T. ladakhensis should be treated as a junior syn- onym of A. lamia. Diaphoromerus perater Sloane, 1920: 133. Notiobia (Anisotarsus) perater (Sloane, 1820): Noonan, Amara (Amathitis) abdominalis 1973; Moore et al., 1987. (Motschulsky, 1844) Notiobia (Anisotarsus) peratra (Sloane, 1820): Lorenz, 1998, 2005. Chydaeus queenslandicus Baehr, 2004: 19 syn. nov. Phobophorus paccatus Motschulsky, 1850: 24 syn. nov. Type material. Lectotype of D. perater (present Type material. Holotype of Phobophorus paccatus: designation): male, labelled “Tasmania, A. Simson” female, “Phobophorus paccatus mihi, Elisabethpol” [print], “Co-type”[print], “Diaphoromerus perater [Motschulsky’s handwriting], and “Elisabethpol” Sl., Id. by T.G. Sloane” [handwritten/print], “Lecto- (ZMM). holo – D. perater Sl., (1.)” [handwritten, on red pa- Remarks. Motschulsky (1850) originally de- per], and “S. A. Museum Specimen” (SAM). Paralec- scribed the genus Phobophorus in a key (p. vii) and totypes: 1 female, labelled “Hobart Tas: Lea” [print], mentioned Ph. paccatus, which was represented “Diaphoromerus perater Sl., Id. by T.G. Sloane, in his collection by one specimen from “Georg.[ia] cotype” [handwritten/print], “4469, Diaphoromerus m.[eridionalis]” (p. 24), as a single species of this perater, Tasmania, Cotype” [handwritten], and “S. genus. According to Motschulsky
Recommended publications
  • Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report
    Geography Monograph Series No. 13 Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. Brisbane, 2009 The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. is a non-profit organization that promotes the study of Geography within educational, scientific, professional, commercial and broader general communities. Since its establishment in 1885, the Society has taken the lead in geo- graphical education, exploration and research in Queensland. Published by: The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. 237 Milton Road, Milton QLD 4064, Australia Phone: (07) 3368 2066; Fax: (07) 33671011 Email: [email protected] Website: www.rgsq.org.au ISBN 978 0 949286 16 8 ISSN 1037 7158 © 2009 Desktop Publishing: Kevin Long, Page People Pty Ltd (www.pagepeople.com.au) Printing: Snap Printing Milton (www.milton.snapprinting.com.au) Cover: Pemberton Design (www.pembertondesign.com.au) Cover photo: Cravens Peak. Photographer: Nick Rains 2007 State map and Topographic Map provided by: Richard MacNeill, Spatial Information Coordinator, Bush Heritage Australia (www.bushheritage.org.au) Other Titles in the Geography Monograph Series: No 1. Technology Education and Geography in Australia Higher Education No 2. Geography in Society: a Case for Geography in Australian Society No 3. Cape York Peninsula Scientific Study Report No 4. Musselbrook Reserve Scientific Study Report No 5. A Continent for a Nation; and, Dividing Societies No 6. Herald Cays Scientific Study Report No 7. Braving the Bull of Heaven; and, Societal Benefits from Seasonal Climate Forecasting No 8. Antarctica: a Conducted Tour from Ancient to Modern; and, Undara: the Longest Known Young Lava Flow No 9. White Mountains Scientific Study Report No 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) Diversity
    VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AS INDICATORS OF GROUND BEETLE (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE) DIVERSITY BY ALAN D. YANAHAN THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2013 Urbana, Illinois Master’s Committee: Dr. Steven J. Taylor, Chair, Director of Research Adjunct Assistant Professor Sam W. Heads Associate Professor Andrew V. Suarez ABSTRACT Formally assessing biodiversity can be a daunting if not impossible task. Subsequently, specific taxa are often chosen as indicators of patterns of diversity as a whole. Mapping the locations of indicator taxa can inform conservation planning by identifying land units for management strategies. For this approach to be successful, though, land units must be effective spatial representations of the species assemblages present on the landscape. In this study, I determined whether land units classified by vegetative communities predicted the community structure of a diverse group of invertebrates—the ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Specifically, that (1) land units of the same classification contained similar carabid species assemblages and that (2) differences in species structure were correlated with variation in land unit characteristics, including canopy and ground cover, vegetation structure, tree density, leaf litter depth, and soil moisture. The study site, the Braidwood Dunes and Savanna Nature Preserve in Will County, Illinois is a mosaic of differing land units. Beetles were sampled continuously via pitfall trapping across an entire active season from 2011–2012. Land unit characteristics were measured in July 2012. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordinated the land units by their carabid assemblages into five ecologically meaningful clusters: disturbed, marsh, prairie, restoration, and savanna.
    [Show full text]
  • Larval Omnivory in Amara Aenea (Coleoptera: Carabidae)
    Eur. J. Entomol. 100 : 329-335, 2003 ISSN 1210-5759 Larval omnivoryAmara in aenea (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Karel HŮRKA and V ojtěch JAROŠÍK Department ofZoology, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-128 44 Praha 2, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Carabids, Amara aenea, larval diet, life histories, seed predation Abstract. The duration of development, survivorship and adult size were compared for the larvae of Amara aenea reared in the first generation on pure diets of seeds ( Stellaria media, Capsella bursa-pastoris, Tussilago farfara, Plantago major, Urtica or dioica, Potentilla argentela), or a pure diet of yellow mealworms (Tenebrio molitor larvae), and on a mixed diet of seeds and mealworm larvae (T. molitor, S. media and C. bursa-pastoris). To ascertain any long-term effects of pure diets, the beetles were reared on the same pure diet for several generations, or on different pure diets in different generations. The hypothesis that the larvae are primary omnivorous was tested. The evidence that the larvae of A. aenea are primary omnivorous was obtained by revealing that the larvae reared on the mixed diet of insects and seeds survived better, and developed faster in larger adults than those reared on the pure diets of seeds or insects. When the beetles were reared on the same pure diet for several generations, survivorship, and in most cases also the duration of development, did not change. However, when the beetles were reared on a different pure diet each generation, survi­ vorship significantly decreased in successive generations. INTRODUCTION Recently, an investigation of nine closely related The adults of the genus Amara Bonelli (Coleoptera: Amara species suggested that their larvae can be divided Carabidae) are generally considered granivorous, since into granivorous, omnivorous and insectivorous forms many have been observed feeding on flower heads or (Saska & Jarošík, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • The Female Genitalia of the Genus Zabrus (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Zabrini). I. the General Structure and the Subgenera Zabrus, Eu
    Eur. J. Entorno!. 100: 115-121, 2003 ISSN 1210-5759 The female genitalia of the genusZabrus (Coleóptera: Carabidae: Zabrini). I. The general structure and the subgeneraZabrus , Euryzabrus, Platyzabrus and Epomidozabrus. Vic e n t e M. ORTUÑO, Jo sé SERRANO, An t o n io ANDÚJAR and Jo s é L. LENCINA Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia. Campus de Espinardo. Aptdo. 4021. 30071 Murcia, Spain; e-mail:[email protected] Key words. Female genitalia,Zabrus, Carabidae, Coleóptera Abstract.The systematics of the genusZabrus Clairville, 1806 is currently based on morphological characters that show a high degree of parallelism. The aim of this study is to find new characters in the female genitalia, which give a better understanding of the phylogeny of the genus and result in a new classification based on monophyletic taxa (subgenera and species groups). For this pur­ pose slides of the whole female reproductive tract were studied under light microscopy and the gonocoxa IX under scanning micro­ scopy. The study of species belonging to eight subgeneraZabrus, of and of twelve subgenera of its sister taxonAmara, shows that Zabrus is characterised by the lack of a spermatheca. This apomorphy is reported for the first time in carabids, and corroborates the monophyly of the genus in comparison Amara.to A villous canal that is intimatelyjoined to the distal bursa copulatrix was found in both genera and in species of related tribes. This feature could be an apomorphy of the Harpalidae sensu Deuve (1988). However, only inZabrus does the villous canal end in a long falciform head, which is probably another autapomorphy of the genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring Within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘I: Synthesis Report
    Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Prepared by Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Hawaii Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817 USA Prepared for EKNA Services Inc. 615 Pi‘ikoi Street, Suite 300 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96814 and State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Airports Division Bishop Museum Technical Report 58 Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i Copyright 2012 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Contribution No. 2012 001 to the Hawaii Biological Survey COVER Adult male Hawaiian long-horned wood-borer, Plagithmysus kahului, on its host plant Chenopodium oahuense. This species is endemic to lowland Maui and was discovered during the arthropod surveys. Photograph by Forest and Kim Starr, Makawao, Maui. Used with permission. Hawaii Biological Report on Monitoring Arthropods within Kahului Airport Environs, Synthesis TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents …………….......................................................……………...........……………..…..….i. Executive Summary …….....................................................…………………...........……………..…..….1 Introduction ..................................................................………………………...........……………..…..….4
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape and Local Controls of Insect Biodiversity in Conservation Grasslands
    Land 2014, 3, 693-718; doi:10.3390/land3030693 OPEN ACCESS land ISSN 2073-445X www.mdpi.com/journal/land/ Article Landscape and Local Controls of Insect Biodiversity in Conservation Grasslands: Implications for the Conservation of Ecosystem Service Providers in Agricultural Environments Thomas O. Crist 1,2,* and Valerie E. Peters 1 1 Institute for the Environment and Sustainability, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-513-529-6187; Fax: +1-513-529-5814. Received: 3 May 2014; in revised form: 23 June 2014 / Accepted: 30 June 2014 / Published: 14 July 2014 Abstract: The conservation of biodiversity in intensively managed agricultural landscapes depends on the amount and spatial arrangement of cultivated and natural lands. Conservation incentives that create semi-natural grasslands may increase the biodiversity of beneficial insects and their associated ecosystem services, such as pollination and the regulation of insect pests, but the effectiveness of these incentives for insect conservation are poorly known, especially in North America. We studied the variation in species richness, composition, and functional-group abundances of bees and predatory beetles in conservation grasslands surrounded by intensively managed agriculture in Southwest Ohio, USA. Characteristics of grassland patches and surrounding land-cover types were used to predict insect species richness, composition, and functional-group abundance using linear models and multivariate ordinations. Bee species richness was positively influenced by forb cover and beetle richness was positively related to grass cover; both taxa had greater richness in grasslands surrounded by larger amounts of semi-natural land cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): Catalogue
    INVERTEBRATE SYSTEMATICS ADVISORY GROUP REPRESENTATIVES OF LANDCARE RESEARCH Dr D.R. Penman Landcare Research Lincoln Agriculture & Science Centre P.O. Box 69, Lincoln, New Zealand Dr T.K. Crosby and Dr M.-C. Larivière Landcare Research Mount Albert Research Centre Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF UNIVERSITIES Dr R.M. Emberson Ecology and Entomology Group Soil, Plant, and Ecological Sciences Division P.O. Box 84, Lincoln University, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF MUSEUMS Mr R.L. Palma Natural Environment Department Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa P.O. Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF OVERSEAS INSTITUTIONS Dr J.F. Lawrence CSIRO Division of Entomology G.P.O. Box 1700, Canberra City A.C.T. 2601, Australia * * * SERIES EDITOR Dr T. K. Crosby Landcare Research Mount Albert Research Centre Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 43 Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): catalogue A. Larochelle and M.-C. Larivière Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand [email protected] [email protected] Manaaki W h e n u a PRESS Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand 2001 4 Larochelle & Larivière (2001): Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) catalogue Copyright © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd 2001 No part of this work covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping information retrieval systems, or otherwise) without the written permission of the publisher. Cataloguing in publication LAROCHELLE, André, 1940– Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): catalogue / A. Larochelle and M.-C. Larivière – Lincoln, Canterbury, N.Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) Peter W
    30 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 42, Nos. 1 & 2 An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Peter W. Messer1 Abstract A survey of Carabidae in the state of Wisconsin, U.S.A. yielded 87 species new to the state and incorporated 34 species previously reported from the state but that were not included in an earlier catalogue, bringing the total number of species to 489 in an annotated checklist. Collection data are provided in full for the 87 species new to Wisconsin but are limited to county occurrences for 187 rare species previously known in the state. Recent changes in nomenclature pertinent to the Wisconsin fauna are cited. ____________________ The Carabidae, commonly known as ‘ground beetles’, with 34, 275 described species worldwide is one of the three most species-rich families of extant beetles (Lorenz 2005). Ground beetles are often chosen for study because they are abun- dant in most terrestrial habitats, diverse, taxonomically well known, serve as sensitive bioindicators of habitat change, easy to capture, and morphologically pleasing to the collector. North America north of Mexico accounts for 2635 species which were listed with their geographic distributions (states and provinces) in the catalogue by Bousquet and Larochelle (1993). In Table 4 of the latter refer- ence, the state of Wisconsin was associated with 374 ground beetle species. That is more than the surrounding states of Iowa (327) and Minnesota (323), but less than states of Illinois (452) and Michigan (466). The total count for Minnesota was subsequently increased to 433 species (Gandhi et al. 2005). Wisconsin county distributions are known for 15 species of tiger beetles (subfamily Cicindelinae) (Brust 2003) with collection records documented for Tetracha virginica (Grimek 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of the Idaho National Laboratory: a Compilation and Review
    Insects of the Idaho National Laboratory: A Compilation and Review Nancy Hampton Abstract—Large tracts of important sagebrush (Artemisia L.) Major portions of the INL have been burned by wildfires habitat in southeastern Idaho, including thousands of acres at the over the past several years, and restoration and recovery of Idaho National Laboratory (INL), continue to be lost and degraded sagebrush habitat are current topics of investigation (Ander- through wildland fire and other disturbances. The roles of most son and Patrick 2000; Blew 2000). Most restoration projects, insects in sagebrush ecosystems are not well understood, and the including those at the INL, are focused on the reestablish- effects of habitat loss and alteration on their populations and ment of vegetation communities (Anderson and Shumar communities have not been well studied. Although a comprehen- 1989; Williams 1997). Insects also have important roles in sive survey of insects at the INL has not been performed, smaller restored communities (Williams 1997) and show promise as scale studies have been concentrated in sagebrush and associated indicators of restoration success in shrub-steppe (Karr and communities at the site. Here, I compile a taxonomic inventory of Kimberling 2003; Kimberling and others 2001) and other insects identified in these studies. The baseline inventory of more habitats (Jansen 1997; Williams 1997). than 1,240 species, representing 747 genera in 212 families, can be The purpose of this paper is to present a taxonomic list of used to build models of insect diversity in natural and restored insects identified by researchers studying cold desert com- sagebrush habitats. munities at the INL.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Beetles (Carabidae) As Seed Predators
    Eur. J. Entomol. 100: 531-544, 2003 ISSN 1210-5759 Ground beetles (Carabidae) as seed predators Al o is HONEK1, Zd e n k a MARTINKOVA1 and Vo jt e c h JAROSIK2 'Research Institute of Crop Production, Dmovská 507, CZ 16106 Prague 6 - Ruzyně, Czech Republic; e-mail:[email protected] ; [email protected] 2Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vinicná 7, CZ 120 00 Prague 2, Czech Republic;[email protected] Key words. Carabidae, seed, predation, herb, weed, preference, consumption, abundance, crop, season Abstract. The consumption and preferences of polyphagous ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) for the seeds of herbaceous plants was determined. The seeds were stuck into plasticine in small tin trays and exposed to beetle predation on surface of the ground. In the laboratory the effect of carabid (species, satiation) and seed (species, size) on the intensity of seed predation was investigated. The consumption of the generally preferredCirsium arvense seed by 23 species of common carabids increased with body size. Seed ofCapsella bursa-pastoris was preferred by small carabids and their consumption rates were not related to their size. The average daily consumption of all the carabid species tested (0.33 mg seeds . mg body mass-1 . day-1) was essentially the same for both kinds of seed. Because of satiation the consumption of seed C.of arvense providedad libitum to Pseudoophonus rufipes decreased over a period of 9 days to 1/3—1/4 of the initial consumption rate. PreferencesP. of rufipes (body mass 29.6 mg) andHarpalus afifiinis (13.4 mg) for the seeds of 64 species of herbaceous plants were determined.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Comparison of Beetle Community Composition on Green Roofs and the Potential for Homogenization
    20182018 Green RoofsUrban and Naturalist Urban Biodiversity SpecialSpecial Issue No.Issue 1:1–15 No. 1 O. Starry, et al. URBAN NATURALIST A Global Comparison of Beetle Community Composition on Green Roofs and the Potential for Homogenization Olyssa Starry1,*, Sydney Gonsalves2, Kelly Ksiazek-Mikenas3, J. Scott MacIvor4, Maggie Gardner1, Alexander Szallies5, and Stephan Brenneisen5 Abstract - Globalization may confer a competitive advantage to species that are urban ex- ploiters and result in homogenization of communities in cities. We tested the application of this hypothesis to green roofs. Using body size as a proxy for life-history strategy, we com- pared small-bodied and large-bodied subsets of beetle communities from 5 cities in Europe and North America. We found that city was an important organizer of both subsets, though more so for the large-bodied one. This result suggests either resilience against homogeni- zation or simply that not enough time has occurred for it to develop. A majority of the 10 most-abundant species found in the North American cities were non-native, in contrast to those found in European cities, a majority of which were native. These findings signal that more research is needed to track drivers of homogenization, such as functional composition, on rooftops as well as in other urban green spaces. Introduction As we consider the social and political impacts of globalization (Sassen 1991), it is important to understand the ecological effects of rapid urban expansion, in- creasing interconnectedness, and domestication on urban environments (Kareiva et al. 2007, Liu et al. 2007). According to the biotic homogenization hypothesis, if rapid urban growth continues along its current trajectory, ecological diversity, especially with respect to urban fauna, will decline, leading to increased com- munity similarity in the urban centers of global cities (McKinney and Lockwood 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • The Family of Carabidae (Coleoptera) in Artvin Hatila National Park of Turkey Temel Gokturk1*, Alim Celik2
    International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology (IJEAB) Vol-2, Issue-2, Mar -Apr- 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijeab/2.2.55 ISSN: 2456-1878 The Family of Carabidae (Coleoptera) in Artvin Hatila National Park of Turkey Temel Gokturk1*, Alim Celik2 1*Artvin Coruh University, Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Entomology and Protection, Artvin, Turkey 2Artvin Forest Department, Forest Protection, Artvin, Turkey Abstract— The faunistical studies on the family Carabidae Hatila Valley National Park and around by using of the (Coleoptera) species in Artvin Hatila National Park in pitfall trap method. Turkey. In this study, totally 32 species belonging to Pterostichinae, Brachininae, Carabinae, Platyninae, II. MATERIAL AND METHODS Lebiinae, Nebriinae and Harpalinae subfamilies of Artvin Hatila Valley National Park was announced as a Carabidae were collected from Artvin province during national park in 1994 and became one of the 40 national 2011-2014. Among these, Amara lucida Duftschmid, parks in our country. This national park area has 16998- Amara aulica Panzer, Brachinus elegans Chaudoir, hectare area and the GPS coordinates of 41º 11′ 11′′ N, 41º Brachinus crepitans Linné, Carabus scabrosus Olivier, 44′ 09′ E′. The altitude of the highest point is 3224 m (Kurt Anisodactylus binotatus Fabricius, Carabus coriaceus Mountain), and the lowest point is 160 m (Çoruh River). Linnaeus, Carabus mulsantianus Paykull, Carabus This national park area has relict and endemic plant cover, graecus Dejean, Harpalus affinis Schrank, Harpalus unusual geological and geomorphological structure, unique caspius Panzer, Ophonus cribricollis Dejean, Ophonus scenic beauty, rich fauna and recreational potential. Semi- azureus Fabricius, Ophonus subquadratus Dejean, arid, subhumid and humid climates are seen in the area.
    [Show full text]