Concepts & Synthesis
CONCEPTS & SYNTHESIS EMPHASIZING NEW IDEAS TO STIMULATE RESEARCH IN ECOLOGY Ecological Monographs, 78(1), 2008, pp. 41–67 Ó 2008 by the Ecological Society of America GLACIAL ECOSYSTEMS 1,9 2 3 4 5 ANDY HODSON, ALEXANDRE M. ANESIO, MARTYN TRANTER, ANDREW FOUNTAIN, MARK OSBORN, 6 7 8 JOHN PRISCU, JOHANNA LAYBOURN-PARRY, AND BIRGIT SATTLER 1Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN United Kingdom 2Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA United Kingdom 3School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1SS United Kingdom 4Departments of Geology, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon 97207-0751 USA 5Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN United Kingdom 6Department of Biological Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717 USA 7Office of the PVC Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart Tas 7001 Australia 8Institute of Ecology, University of Innsbruk, Technikerstrabe 25 A-0620 Austria Abstract. There is now compelling evidence that microbially mediated reactions impart a significant effect upon the dynamics, composition, and abundance of nutrients in glacial melt water. Consequently, we must now consider ice masses as ecosystem habitats in their own right and address their diversity, functional potential, and activity as part of alpine and polar environments. Although such research is already underway, its fragmentary nature provides little basis for developing modern concepts of glacier ecology. This paper therefore provides a much-needed framework for development by reviewing the physical, biogeochemical, and microbiological characteristics of microbial habitats that have been identified within glaciers and ice sheets. Two key glacial ecosystems emerge, one inhabiting the glacier surface (the supraglacial ecosystem) and one at the ice-bed interface (the subglacial ecosystem).
[Show full text]