1 Running head: CLINICAL EFFICACY OF ATTENTIONAL RETRAINING Clinical Efficacy of Attentional Bias Modification Procedures: An Updated Meta-analysis Cristina Mogoașe and Daniel David Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania Ernst H.W. Koster Gent University, Belgium Reference: Mogoase, C., David, D., & Koster, E.H.W. (in press). Clinical Efficacy of Attentional Bias Modification Procedures: An Updated Meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology. Disclaimer: Please note that this is the uncorrected proof that may differ from the final article Author Note Cristina Mogoașe, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Babeş-Bolyai University, Romania and Department of Medicine, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; Daniel David, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj- Napoca, Romania and Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York; Ernst H.W. Koster, Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to: Cristina Mogoașe, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Babeş-Bolyai University, No. 37, Republicii Street 400015, Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania. Tel/Fax: + 40 264434141; E-mail:
[email protected] 2 Running head: CLINICAL EFFICACY OF ATTENTIONAL RETRAINING Abstract Context: Attentional bias modification (ABM) procedures is a promising intervention tool for a variety of clinical conditions. Objectives: This study provides an updated review of the clinical impact of ABM by employing standard meta-analytic procedures to: (a) estimate the average effect size of ABM in reducing both attention bias (AB) and symptoms; (b) estimate the average effect size for different conditions (e.g., anxiety, depression, substance abuse); (c) test possible variables that may moderate the effect sizes, and (d) investigate the relationship between pre-existent AB and the reduction in AB and symptoms.