Local Effects of a Sedentary Grazer on Stream Algae

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Local Effects of a Sedentary Grazer on Stream Algae Freshwater Biotogy (1995) 33, 401-409 Local effects of a sedentary grazer on stream algae ELIZABETH A. BERGEY Department of Entomology, University of Califomia, Berkeley, CA 94720, U.S.A. Present address and address for correspondence: Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, U.S.A. SUMMARY 1. Larvae of the sedentary aquatic caterpillar Petrophila confusaiis (Walker) construct silken retreats around which they feed; outside these clearly demarcated grazed areas, stream algae are exposed to a variety of mobile grazers. Comparisons of the algal community inside and just outside grazed zones were made for third- and fifth-instar Petrophila in the South Fork of the Eel River, California. 2. Densities of both the filamentous macroalga Cladophora and diatom assemblages were significantly reduced within the grazed areas during both larval instars. Grazing of diatoms was taxonomically non-selective. 3. In spring, the grazed zones were relatively large (mean = 22.7 cm^) and visibly increased epilithic spatial patchiness. 4. Per cent composition of diatom assemblages inside and outside the grazed areas differed during the third instar but not during the fifth instar. During the third instar, the grazed zone contained more Synedra ulna (a conimon inunigrant) and less Gomphonenia olivaceum (a late-successional species). Introduction Benthic algal grazers in freshwater habitats include a to this research emphasis. Whereas mobile grazers taxonomically wide array of animals, ranging from include vertebrates (e.g. Power, Matthews & Stewart, fish and amphibians to several groups of invertebrates 1985), crustaceans (e.g. Flint & Goldman, 1975), mol- (e.g. snails, insects and crustaceans). They can be luscs (e.g. Tuchman & Stevenson, 1991), insects (e.g. characterized as being mobile grazers or sedentary Feminella & Resh, 1991), oligochaetes (e.g. Hann, grazers. Mobile grazers change location in conjunction 1991) and protozoa (e.g. McCormick, 1991), sedentary with feeding and tend to focus their grazing on distinct grazers primarily include a small number of insects patches of periphyton (e.g. Hart, 1981; Kohler, 1984; [e.g. caterpillars of the genus Petrophila (Pyralidae: Vaughn, 1986; Steinman et ai, 1987; Scrimgeour et al, Lepidoptera; e.g. Tuskes, 1977), several chironomids 1991). In contrast, sedentary grazers feed in a localized (Chironomidae: Diptera; e.g. Pringle, 1985), and the area (e.g. Hart, 1985). Although not physically fixed caddisfly genus Leucotrichia (Hydroptilidae: Trichop- to the substrate, sedentary grazers construct attached tera; e.g. Hart, 1985)]. Although few in terms of retreats and graze the surrounding area and, often, numbers of taxa, sedentary grazers are often locally the retreat itself. Alternatively, fixed retreats may be abundant (Petrophila: Peterson & Grimm, 1992; chiron- shallow mines in aquatic macrophytes, with the animal omids: Hershey et al, 1988; leucotrichia: Hart, 1985) grazing epiphytes and filter feeding (e.g. Lamberti & and may be important components in local foodweb Moore, 1984). dynamics. Studies of benthic grazing have focused almost Most sedentary grazers produce a clearly demarc- exclusively on mobile grazers. Mobile grazers include ated grazed zone on the substrate around their retreats. a much larger number of taxa than sedentary grazers Outside this area, the algal commuruty is exposed to (McAuliffe, 1984), a factor that certainly contributes mobile grazers. Thus, algal populations inside and © 1995 BlackweU Science Ltd 401 402 £. A. Bergey outside the areas grazed by sedentary grazers will be extended into a pool. The area grazed by fifth instars influenced by differences in both grazing intensity was estimated by removing cobbles with Petrophila (high and low) and grazing strategy (sedentary and pupal cases and tracing the outline of the grazed zone mobile). Sedentary grazers are especially amenable to on to clear plastic. The 30 resulting tracings were cut studies of grazer-alga interactions because they have out and weighed. fixed locations and thus need not be confined in cages Cladophora biomass next to Pefrop/ii/o-grazed zones or artificial channels (as mobile grazers are often was measured by scraping Cladophora from rocks constrained). within 20 25-cm^ quadrats. Algal samples were frozen This study examines grazing by the sedentary cater- and later thawed, dried at 105 °C for 2 days, weighed, pillar Petrophila confusalis (Walker) through examina- ashed at 550 °C for 1 h, and reweighed. Samples of tion of epilithic algae within and adjacent to areas the ash were examined microscopically for diatom grazed hy Petrophila larvae. This comparison is made frustules. separately for the third- and fifth-instar larvae, in order In addition to making comparisons of algal popula- to evaluate possible ontogenetic changes in grazing. tions inside and outside areas grazed by Petrophila larvae, differences in the impacts of grazing by third- and fifth-{final) instar larvae were examined. Algal Methods samples associated with the fifth instar were collected The South Fork of the Eel River is a third-order stream on 10 June 1991 when some of the overwintering located in the Coast Range of northern California Petrophila were begiruiing to pupate. Algal samples (Mendocino Co.; latitude 39°44' longitude 123°38')- associated with the third instar were collected on 24 Local riparian vegetation is dominated by old-growth August 1991 when the next generation of Petrophila Douglas-fir {Pseudotsuga menziesii Franco) and, while was present. Sample collection and processing the banks are typically well shaded, the study reach methods were the same for both sets of samples. bordered an abandoned streambed, resulting in full Epilithic algae were collected with a brush sampler sunlight on the stream for about 7 h per day during {modified from Tuchman & Stevenson, 1980; area = summer. The 75-m-long study reach had a predomi- 1.53 cm^). For the third ins tar-associated samples, the nantly cobble-rubble substrate and the following sampler collected algae beneath the larval retreat (the characteristics during the study: width 9-12 m; depth retreat was removed prior to sampling and, once typically less than 1 m; spatial variation in current removed, its former location was not distinguishable velocity of 0.02-0.25 m s~^; and a water temperature in the field) and most of the grazed area around the of lS-17 °C in June, and 17-23 °C in August. retreat (diameter across grazed area and retreat was The life history of Petrophila confusalis in northern approximately 1.8 cm). For the fifth-ins tar-associated California has been described by Tuskes (1977, 1981). samples, the sampler was placed within the grazed Larvae build silken retreats over irregularities in rocks area surrounding the retreat (diameter across grazed or submerged wood, and graze both the underside of areas and the retreat was approximately 5.4 cm). the retreat (Kubik, 1981) and the surrounding area Samples outside the grazed area were taken adjacent (Tuskes, 1977). In preparation for pupation, fifth-instar to the grazed zone. Six {in June) or eight {in August) larvae form a flattened dome-like silk case, under replicate pairs of samples were collected and preserved which they pupate. Petrophita has two to three genera- in 6% formalin. In addition to algal samples, the larva tions per year in northern California (Tuskes, 1977). and the retreat or pupal tent associated with most The portion of the population studied consisted of samples were collected. overwintering fifth-instar larvae and third-instar lar- Processing epilithic samples included two steps: vae of tbe following generation. {i) a low-magnification quantification of filamentous Petrophila density was obtained by counting pupal algae and diatoms; and (ii) a high-magnification deter- cases {visible as light-coloured ovals in areas cleared mination of per cent composiHon of the diatoms. of Cladophora) in late June across 10 randomly located Samples were washed to remove formalin and transects in the 75-m-long study reach. Transects were adjusted to a volume of 4 ml. One millilitre of the 0.5-m wide and maximum depth was less than 1 m, well-shaken sample was added to a Sedwick-Rafter except in the two furthest upstream transects, which cell for algal quantification; the remainder of the © 1995 BlackweU Science Ltd, Freshwater Biology, 33, 401-109 Effects of a sedentary grazer on algae 403 sample was saved for diatom identification. Diatoms the two most upstream transects (3.64 and 4.50 (both living and non-living) were counted in 24 ran- individuals m~^), which were located in a pool with domly located fields at lOOx magnification with a deeper water (to 1,7 m) and slower velocity than the Whipple micrometer. Filamentous algae were identi- rest of the study reach. Excluding the pool transects, fied to genus and regarded as present or absent in mean Petrophila density was 35.64 individuals m"^ each of 100 randomly located Whipple disk fields. (SD = 10.12, n = 8). Some retreats were almost The remaining 3 ml of each sample were oxidized certainly missed in the visual counts; therefore values by; (i) warming in 30% hydrogen peroxide for 2 days; are probably underestimates. Third-instar larval densi- or (ii) heating in 30% hydrogen peroxide and adding ties were not estimated because retreats were better the catalyst potassium dichromate (an oxidative reac- concealed and difficult to count accurately. tion occurred within a few minutes). After rinsing, Algal abundances were lower inside than outside the diatoms were dried on coverslips and mounted in grazed area (Table 1). Relative numbers of Cladophora, Hyrax medium. Transects were counted at lOOOX green algal filaments other than Cladophora (primarily magnification until at least 350 individual diatoms Oedogonium, Mougeotia, and Zygnema), and blue—green had been identified. Frustule length was measured for filaments (primarily Anabaena, Calothrix, and Oscil- 100 diatoms per sample. Paired f-tests were used to latoria) were significantly lower (2-tailed paired f~test; compare mean sample sizes inside and outside the » = 6 or 8; P ^e 0.05) inside the grazed area for both Petrophila grazed areas.
Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera Recorded for Imperial County California Compiled by Jeffrey Caldwell [email protected] 1-925-949-8696 Note
    Lepidoptera Recorded for Imperial County California Compiled by Jeffrey Caldwell [email protected] 1-925-949-8696 Note: BMNA = Butterflies and Moths of North America web site MPG = Moth Photographers Group web site Most are from the Essig Museum’s California Moth Specimens Database web site Arctiidae. Tiger and Lichen Moths. Apantesis proxima (Notarctia proxima). Mexican Tiger Moth. 8181 [BMNA] Ectypia clio (clio). Clio Tiger Moth. 8249 Estigmene acrea (acrea). Salt Marsh Moth. 8131 Euchaetes zella. 8232 Autostichidae (Deoclonidae). Oegoconia novimundi. Four-spotted Yellowneck Moth. 1134 (Oegoconia quadripuncta mis-applied) Bucculatricidae. Ribbed Cocoon-maker Moths. Bucculatrix enceliae. Brittlebrush Moth. 0546 Cossidae. Goat Moths, Carpenterworm Moths, and Leopard Moths. Comadia henrici. 2679 Givira mucida. 2660 Hypopta palmata. 2656 Prionoxystus robiniae (mixtus). Carpenterworm or Locust Borer. 2693 Depressariidae. Pseudethmia protuberans. 1008 [MPG] Ethmiidae. Now assigned to Depressariidae. Ethmiinae. Ethmia timberlakei. 0984 Pseudethmia protuberans. 1008 Gelechiidae. Twirler Moths. Aristotelia adceanotha. 1726 [Sighting 1019513 BMNA] Chionodes abdominella. 2054 Chionodes dentella. 2071 Chionodes fructuaria. 2078 Chionodes kincaidella. 2086 (reared from Atriplex acanthocarpa in Texas) Chionodes oecus. 2086.2 Chionodes sistrella. 2116 Chionodes xanthophilella. 2125 Faculta inaequalis. Palo Verde Webworm. 2206 Friseria cockerelli. Mesquite Webworm. 1916 Gelechia desiliens. 1938 Isophrictis sabulella. 1701 Keiferia lycopersicella. Tomato Pinworm. 2047 Pectinophora gossypiella. Pink Bollworm. 2261 Prolita puertella. 1895 Prolita veledae. 1903 Geometridae. Inchworm Moths, Loopers, Geometers, or Measuring Worms. Archirhoe neomexicana. 7295 Chesiadodes coniferaria. 6535 Chlorochlamys appellaria. 7073 Cyclophora nanaria. Dwarf Tawny Wave. W 7140 Dichorda illustraria. 7055 Dichordophora phoenix. Phoenix Emerald. 7057 Digrammia colorata. Creosote Moth. 6381 Digrammia irrorata (rubricata). 6395 Digrammia pictipennata. 6372 Digrammia puertata.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 2018, 419, 42 Knowledge & © K. Pabis, Published by EDP Sciences 2018 Management of Aquatic https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2018030 Ecosystems www.kmae-journal.org Journal fully supported by Onema REVIEW PAPER What is a moth doing under water? Ecology of aquatic and semi-aquatic Lepidoptera Krzysztof Pabis* Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Lodz, Poland Abstract – This paper reviews the current knowledge on the ecology of aquatic and semi-aquatic moths, and discusses possible pre-adaptations of the moths to the aquatic environment. It also highlights major gaps in our understanding of this group of aquatic insects. Aquatic and semi-aquatic moths represent only a tiny fraction of the total lepidopteran diversity. Only about 0.5% of 165,000 known lepidopterans are aquatic; mostly in the preimaginal stages. Truly aquatic species can be found only among the Crambidae, Cosmopterigidae and Erebidae, while semi-aquatic forms associated with amphibious or marsh plants are known in thirteen other families. These lepidopterans have developed various strategies and adaptations that have allowed them to stay under water or in close proximity to water. Problems of respiratory adaptations, locomotor abilities, influence of predators and parasitoids, as well as feeding preferences are discussed. Nevertheless, the poor knowledge on their biology, life cycles, genomics and phylogenetic relationships preclude the generation of fully comprehensive evolutionary scenarios. Keywords: Lepidoptera / Acentropinae / caterpillars / freshwater / herbivory Résumé – Que fait une mite sous l'eau? Écologie des lépidoptères aquatiques et semi-aquatiques. Cet article passe en revue les connaissances actuelles sur l'écologie des mites aquatiques et semi-aquatiques, et discute des pré-adaptations possibles des mites au milieu aquatique.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List for Garey Park-Inverts
    Species List for Garey Park-Inverts Category Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Abundance Category Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Abundance Arachnid Araneae Agelenidae Funnel Weaver Common Arachnid Araneae Thomisidae Misumena vatia Goldenrod Crab Spider Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Araneus miniatus Black-Spotted Orbweaver Rare Arachnid Araneae Thomisidae Misumessus oblongus American Green Crab Spider Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Argiope aurantia Yellow Garden Spider Common Arachnid Araneae Uloboridae Uloborus glomosus Featherlegged Orbweaver Uncommon Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Argiope trifasciata Banded Garden Spider Uncommon Arachnid Endeostigmata Eriophyidae Aceria theospyri Persimmon Leaf Blister Gall Rare Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Gasteracantha cancriformis Spinybacked Orbweaver Common Arachnid Endeostigmata Eriophyidae Aculops rhois Poison Ivy Leaf Mite Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Gea heptagon Heptagonal Orbweaver Rare Arachnid Ixodida Ixodidae Amblyomma americanum Lone Star Tick Rare Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Larinioides cornutus Furrow Orbweaver Common Arachnid Ixodida Ixodidae Dermacentor variabilis American Dog Tick Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Mangora gibberosa Lined Orbweaver Uncommon Arachnid Opiliones Sclerosomatidae Leiobunum vittatum Eastern Harvestman Uncommon Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Mangora placida Tuft-legged Orbweaver Uncommon Arachnid Trombidiformes Anystidae Whirligig Mite Rare Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Mecynogea lemniscata Basilica Orbweaver Rare Arachnid Eumesosoma roeweri
    [Show full text]
  • THE MOTHS of JUNE 2020 Slide 1
    THE MOTHS Slide 1 OF JUNE 2020 THE MOTHS OF JUNE 2020 Slide 2 The moths described in these slides were found in the morning on the light trap that is in our back yard in London Ontario. My goal is to learn more about my moth neighbours and, by sharing, inspire others to do the same. Light Source Thin White Cotton Sheet Photographer – Eric Auzins PowerPoint – Karen Auzins Species Identification – “Nature Buddies” Descriptions – Wikipedia, BugGuide In Ontario There Are 130 species of Butterflies 2840 Species of Moths Tiger Swallowtail Small-eyed Sphinx There are still moths that are not yet identified! June 6, 2020 Small-eyed Sphinx (Paonias myops) The Small-eyed Sphinx (Paonias myops) is a moth of the family Sphingidae. The hind wings (hidden in this photo) have small "eye" markings. It is found from south-eastern Canada to Florida and westward almost to the Pacific Coast and Mexico. The wingspan is 52–69 mm. Adults are on wing from June to September. The Sphingidae is a family of moths (Lepidoptera), commonly known as hawk moths. They are moderate to large in size and are distinguished among moths for their rapid, sustained flying ability. Their narrow wings and streamlined abdomens are adaptations for rapid flight. Some are capable of flying at over 5.3 m/s (12 miles per hour) The larvae feed on birches, hawthorns, poplars, fruit trees and willows. June 8, 2020 Hickory Tussock Moth (Lophocampa caryae) The Hickory Tussock Moth (Lophocampa caryae) is a member of the family Erebidae which includes the tiger moths.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 33, Number 1 (October, 2012)
    Phaëton The Official Newsletter of the Maryland Entomological Society Volume 33, Number 1 October 2012 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ EDITOR: Eugene J. Scarpulla – [email protected] FACULTY SPONSORS: Frank E. Hanson and Austin P. (Bob) Platt Department of Biological Sciences University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC) 1000 Hilltop Circle Baltimore, MD 21250 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Meeting Announcement The Maryland Entomological Society's 288th regular meeting will be held Friday, 19 October 2012, at 8:00 p.m., in Room 004 (one floor below the street level), Biological Sciences Building, University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC). Bring a friend and specimens, observations, and books to share. Refreshments will be provided. Presentations are scheduled to begin at 8:15 p.m. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Speaker: Leo J. Kenefic, Ph.D., Postdoctoral Fellow, University of Maryland
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal Variation in Enrichment Effects During Periphyton Succession in a Nitrogen-Limited Desert Stream Ecosystem
    J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 1992,11(1)10-36 0 1992 by The North American Benthological Society Temporal variation in enrichment effects during periphyton succession in a nitrogen-limited desert stream ecosystem CHRISTOPHER G. PETERSON' AND NANCY B. GRIMM Department of Zoology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287 USA Abstract. Periphyton succession was studied over 89 d in longitudinally adjacent reaches (a riffle and run) in Sycamore Creek, a spatially intermittent desert stream. Effects of nitrogen limitation were assessed by comparing algal development on clay saucers containing either nitrate-enriched or unenriched agar. We evaluated effects of grazing on periphyton accrual by amending agar in half the substrata from each enrichment condition with an insecticide (Malathion). Early successional (25-d) communities on unenriched substrata were dominated by Epithemia sorex, a diatom capable of N, fixation; non-fixing diatoms dominated enriched communities. NO,-N enrichment increased algal diversity (H') and delayed late-successional dominance by Calothrix, a heterocystous cyano- bacterium. Replacement of diatoms by cyanobacteria was likely facilitated by autogenic changes in nutrient and light conditions within the periphyton and temporal increases in water temperature. Three measures of algal biomass exhibited nearly linear increases in all treatments over the 3-mo study. Enrichment enhanced standing crops of chlorophyll a and ash-free dry mass (AFDM) in both reaches, an effect most pronounced within the first 3-4 wk. Algal populations unable to fix N, were stimulated by enrichment but remained in low abundance on unenriched substrata whereas biov- olume of N2-fixing populations was lower on enriched substrata relative to controls.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020 Hickory Nut Gorge Green Salamander (Aneides caryaensis) Photo by Austin Patton 2014 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. The list is published periodically, generally every two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Moths of the Kingston Study Area
    Moths of the Kingston Study Area Last updated 30 July 2015 by Mike Burrell This checklist contains the 783 species known to have occurred within the Kingston Study. Major data sources include KFN bioblitzes, an earlier version created by Gary Ure (2013) and the Queen’s University Biological Station list by Kit Muma (2008). For information about contributing your sightings or to download the latest version of this checklist, please visit: http://kingstonfieldnaturalists.org/moths/moths.html Contents Superfamily: Tineoidea .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Family: Tineidae ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 Subfamily: Tineinae .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Family: Psychidae ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Subfamily: Psychinae ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Superfamily: Gracillarioidea ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Family: Gracillariidae ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of Michigan, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Investigation of the Arthropod Fauna of Quitobaquito Springs Area, Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Arizona
    COOPERATIVE NATIONAL PARK RESOURCES STUDIES UNIT UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 125 Biological Sciences (East) Bldg. 43 Tucson, Arizona 85721 R. Roy Johnson, Unit Leader National Park Senior Research Scientist TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 23 A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF THE ARTHROPOD FAUNA OF QUITOBAQUITO SPRINGS AREA, ORGAN PIPE CACTUS NATIONAL MONUMENT, ARIZONA KENNETH J. KINGSLEY, RICHARD A. BAILOWITZ, and ROBERT L. SMITH July 1987 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE/UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA National Park Service Project Funds CONTRIBUTION NUMBER CPSU/UA 057/01 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction......................................................................................................................................1 Methods............................................................................................................................................1 Results ............................................................................................................................................2 Discussion......................................................................................................................................20 Literature Cited ..............................................................................................................................22 Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................23 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Insects Collected at Quitobaquito Springs ...................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of Bucks County, Pennsylvania, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • Barnum Et Al. 2013 (Tropical Ecology)
    Journal of Tropical Ecology (2013) 29:291–299. © Cambridge University Press 2013 doi:10.1017/S026646741300028X Use of stable isotope ratios to characterize potential shifts in the isotopic niches of grazing insects following an amphibian decline in a Neotropical stream ,1 Thomas R. Barnum∗ ,PietVerburg ,SusanS.Kilham ,MattR.Whiles ,KarenR.Lips∗∗, † ‡ § Checo Colon-Gaud´ and Catherine M. Pringle∗ †† ∗ Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Hamilton, New Zealand † Department of Biodiversity, Earth and Environmental Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA ‡ Department of Zoology and Center for Ecology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, USA § ∗∗ Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA Department of Biology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, USA †† (Received 26 September 2012; revised 25 April 2013; accepted 25 April 2013; first published online 23 May 2013) Abstract: Neotropical streams are losing dominant consumer groups as a result of disease-driven amphibian declines. The herbivorous tadpoles of Lithobates warszewitschii were once abundant in the Rio Maria in the Eastern Cordillera Central of Panama, where they consumed algae and organic matter. The decline of this once abundant grazer has the potential to affect the resources consumed by insect grazers in this system. Stable isotopes were used to characterize changes in the resource use before and after amphibian declines of four abundant insect grazer taxa: Stenonema spp., Thraulodes spp., Psephenus spp. and Petrophila spp. We collected 11 isotope samples of L. warszewitschii and 27 isotope samples of these insect taxa in 2006, and then 24 more isotope samples of the same insect taxa in 2008, 20 mo.
    [Show full text]