38. Talensi-Nabdam District Profile
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TALENSI NABDAM Feed the Future Ghana District Profile Series - February 2017 - Issue 1 Talensi-Nabdam was one of the districts in Upper East that split in DISTRICT PROFILE CONTENT two districts in 2013: Talensi and Nabdam. This profile observes the area including these both districts as most of the data captured are 1. Cover Page with reference to Talensi-Nabdam . 2. USAID Project Data Talensi is bordered to the north by the Bolgatanga Municipality, to the 3-4. Agricultural Data south by the West and East Mamprusi districts (both in the Northern Region), to the west by Kassena-Nankana district, and to the east by 5. Health, Nutrition and Sanitation the Bawku West and Nabdam districts. Nabdam is bordered to the North by the Bongo District, South by the Talensi District, to the East 6. USAID Presence by the Bawku West District and to the West the Bolgatanga Munici- 7. Demographic and Weather Data pality. Both districts have a total population of 123,983 inhabitants, out of which 62,200 are males and 61,783 females with an average 8. Discussion Questions household size of 5.7 persons. The boxes below contain relevant economic indicators such as per capita expenditure and poverty prevalence for a better understanding of its development. Poverty Prevalence 17.1 % Daily per capita expenditure 3.43 USD Households with moderate or severe hunger* 67.9% Household Size 5.7 members Poverty7 Depth 3.3 % Total Population of the Poor 21,201 1 USAID PROJECT DATA This section contains data and information related to USAID sponsored interventions in Talensi Nabdam The number of direct USAID beneficiaries* increased Table 1: USAID Projects Info, Talensi Nabdam, 2014-2016 Beneficiaries Data 2014 2015 2016 exponentially during the observed period from 106 Direct Beneficiaries 106 2 ,314 5 ,501 to 5,501 as Table 1 shows. One nucleus farmer is Male 52 1 ,184 3 ,108 Female 54 1 ,130 2 ,393 currently operating in the district and 19 demonstra- Undefined tion plots have been established to support beneficia- Nucleus Farmers 0 1 n/a ry training. See Infographic 1 for the demonstration Male Female 1 plot disaggregate. Small amount of agricultural loans Undefined were facilitated by USAID intervention as shown in Demoplots 4 1 5 n/a Male 0 5 Table 1. Direct beneficiaries yields and gross margins Female 1 7 for the district are not available. The presence of Undefined 3 3 Investment and Impact USAID development work is average, with an above Ag. Rural loans 1 ,663 average number of beneficiaries, decent number of USAID Projects Present 5 Beneficiaries Score 1.0 3.0 3 .0 demo plots and small loans during 2014-2016. This Presence Score 2014-2016 2.1 resulted in a USAID presence score*** of 2.1 out of District Flag 2014-2016 Red Source: USAID Project Reporting, 2014-2016 4. In addition, the district is flagged RED**** indicat- Source: USAID Project Reporting, 2014-2015 ing that while the project presence or intervention is average the impact indicators show regress as com- pared to 2012. Find more details on USAID Presence vs. Impact scoring on page 7. Infographic 1: Demo Plots in Talensi Nabdam, 2014-2015 The presence calculation 37** includes the number of direct 19* beneficiaries and Agricultural Demo Plots Rural loans. 4(Soyabean) (Maize) 15 New released Variety, Etubi Crop Genetics, Plouging, Early Maturing Afayak, New released variety, Basil Phosphate, Crop Genetics, Variety, Hybrid Variety, Drought Tolerant Variety, Harrowing, Planting in Plouging, No Till, Harrowing Planting in Rows, Inoculation, Rows, Fertilization, Pest control Fertilization, Pest control Source: USAID Project Reporting, 2014, 2015 * Please note that the number of demoplots is smaller than the sum of separate plots by crop because crop rotation has been exercised in the same demo ** “Direct Beneficiary, an individual who comes in direct contact with a set of interventions” FTF Handbook, 2016 *** and **** More detail on presence score range and districtflag range can be found in page 8. All data and information including full citations can be accessed at www.ghanalinks.org 2 AGRICULTURAL DATA This section contains agricultural data for Talensi Nabdam such as production by commodity, gross margins and yields. Agricultural production in Talensi-Nabdam involves Figure 1: Share of Agricultural Production, by Commodity, in Talensi-Nabdam, 2010-2015 Cowpea Sweet Potato 3.5% Groundnut several commodities; sweet potatos, groundnut, maize, 14.1% 11.5% Soybean sorghum, rice and others produced during 2010-2015 as 7.3% Maize shown in Figure 1. Talensi-Nabdam is not one of the main 19.3% Sorghum agricultural producers in the Upper West Region. It 16.8% Millet 10.3% accounted for only 5.6% of the regional agricultural Rice 17.2% production in 2015. Noticeable in Talensi-Nabdam just as Source: Agriculture Production Reports 2011- 2015, MOFA Figure 2: Average Yields by Commodity in Talensi-Nabdam, in the other districts in the Upper East Region is the high USG Beneficaries and district's average, 2013-2015, MT/ha 2.50 2.29 2.16 2 2.00 production of sweet potato, compared to other crops. 1.53 1.50 1.50 1.4 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.9 Yield data, presented in Figure 3, contain values of yields 0.50 - of three commodities: maize, rice and soybean in 2015, Maize Soybean Rice Maize Soybean Rice Maize Soybean Rice 2015 2014 2013 Others-MofA 2014 and 2013 as reported from MOFA. Source: Agriculture Project Reporting 2015, Agriculture Production Survey, 2013, Kansas State University Table 2: Agricultural Production and Yields in Talensi-Nabdam, 2010-2015, in MT and MT/ha Commodity 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Total Cowpea 715 728 710 1,513 996 923 5,585 Groundnut 1,621 1,800 1,791 4,600 4,330 4,338 18,480 Maize 3,917 3,846 4,148 6,749 6,976 5,292 30,928 Millet 2,300 2,295 2,219 2,892 2,733 2,400 14,839 Rice 5,126 4,632 3,984 4,758 3,077 5,890 27,467 Sorghum 3,815 4,204 5,036 5,064 4,680 4,158 26,957 Soybean 1,678 1,792 1,782 1,980 2,369 2,041 11,642 Sweet Potato 4,859 5,460 6,860 5,368 22,547 Yields in MT/Ha 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Cowpea 0.51 0.52 0.47 0.55 0.40 0.42 Groundnut 0.39 0.44 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.82 Maize 1.53 1.50 1.40 1.52 1.60 1.26 Millet 0.54 0.54 0.50 0.60 0.64 0.60 Rice 2.29 2.16 2.09 2.60 1.70 3.10 Sorghum 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.20 0.99 Soybean 0.94 1.00 0.90 1.10 1.15 1.14 Sweet Potato 9.10 10.00 14.00 8.80 10.00 Source: Agriculture Report 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, MOFA.Values for 2010-2013 referr to Talensi Nabdam All data and information including full citations can be accessed at www.ghanalinks.org 3 AGRICULTURAL DATA This section focuses on the Women Empowerment in Agricul- ture Index results for Talensi Nabdam What is the Women Empowerment Talensi-Nabdam Results in Agriculture Index? Women play a prominent role in agriculture. Yet they The results of both male and female respondents on the face persistent economic and social constraints. Wom- four domains are displayed in Figure 3. en’s empowerment is a main focus of Feed the Future in order to achieve its objectives of inclusive agriculture Production Domain: Women feel comfortable with providing input related to production decisions as sector growth and improved nutritional status. The indicated by 89% of the women of the survey sample. WEAI is comprised of two weighted sub-indexes: However, they have less control over the use of house- Domains Empowerment Index (5DE) and Gender Parity hold income than men– 49.5% of women vs 68.6% of Index (GPI). The 5DE examines the five domains of male respondents. empowerment: production, resources, income, leader- Resource Domain: A majority of the women have a ship and time. The GPI compares the empowerment of right to asset ownership and to purchase and move women to the empowerment of their male counterpart assets– 66.3% and 77.5% respectively. These figures are slightly lower than the figures for the male respondents. in the household. This section presents the results from Only 26% of the women have the right to decide or have these empowerment indicators of the 5DE for Talen- access to credit, compared to 27.7% of the male respon- si-Nabdam, part of a bigger survey conducted by Kansas dents. Nonetheless, access to credit is equally low for State University. both genders. Leadership Domain: 85.2% and 76.4% of the women The Domains: What Do They Represent? interviewed have the right to group membership and The Production domain assesses the ability of individuals public speaking respectively. The public speaking indica- tor is the highest percentage for women in Talensi-Nab- to provide input and autonomously make decisions dam. about agricultural production. The Resources domain Time Domain: A thin majority of women and men in reflects individuals’ control over and access to produc- Talensi-Nabdam are satisfied with the workload in their tive resources. The Income domain monitors individuals’ everyday life– 60.9% and 76.6% respectively. The values ability to direct the financial resources derived from remain the same with respect to satisfaction with leisure agricultural production or other sources.