DOCSLIB.ORG

BIO 456/585 Fall 2015 Ornithology UNCW ORDERS of BIRDS (Part I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BIO 456/585 Fall 2015 Ornithology UNCW ORDERS of BIRDS (Part I BIO 456/585 Fall 2015 Ornithology UNCW ORDERS OF BIRDS (Part I) In lab we have a variety of bird skins and mounts from different orders though some orders are better represented than others. As you examine the specimens, make note of key characteristics that distinguish one group of birds from another. Especially note the differences in the bills and feet for each order. Use your field guide to help identify important characters of each species throughout this lab. Also, as you examine the skins, try to imagine how living representatives of each species live and how their morphology may be adaptive to their way of life. You will be responsible for knowing the order, family, and complete common name for each specimen in lab. You do not need to know the scientific (Latin) names provided below. Where skins of both sexes, different age classes, or winter versus breeding plumage are provided, you will need to learn the plumage differences. Skins can be found in the drawers labeled by order and family, the numbered species found here correspond with drawer numbers. Mounts are labeled with TC-M## (Teaching Collection-Mount) that can also be found on this handout. Superorder Palaeognathae (Ratites) We have no skins of birds from these orders. Refer to your text for distinguishing features. Order Struthioniformes Family Struthionidae - ostriches Order Rheiformes Family Rheidae – rheas Lesser Rhea (Rhea americana) feathers and tarsometatarsus only. Note how the structure of these feathers differs from those of flying birds. Order Casuariiformes Family Casuariidae - emus and cassowaries Order Apterygiformes (Dinornithiformes) Family Apterygidae - kiwis Order Tinamiformes Family Tinamidae - tinamous Superorder Neognathae Order Gaviiformes Family Gaviidae - loons. Open-water swimming birds with dagger-like bills. Larger than most ducks; longer bodied, and thicker-necked than grebes. Can dive to 200 ft.; may dive or merely submerge; sometimes swim with only head above water; usually run along surface on take-off. Note the shape of the bill, the distinguishing characteristic between loon species. Common Loon (Gavia immer) mount TC-M35. Breeding plumage: head and neck glossy black with broken white collar, back checkered with black and white. Winter: crown, nape, and back dark gray. 2 Order Podicipediformes Family Podicipedidae - grebes. Aquatic, expert divers but labored fliers (with drooping neck). Distinguished from ducks by thin neck, tailless look, pointed bill (except in Pied-billed Grebe). Feet lobed. Pied-billed Grebe (Podilymbus podiceps) Compare length of neck with loons. Distinguish plumage from other grebes. Horned Grebe (Podiceps auritus) Winter plumage: note the sharp contrast in darker to lighter colors on the head. Also note the difference in bill shape and length with the Pied-billed Grebe. Western Grebe (Aechmophorus occidentalis) Our largest North American grebe with long neck and yellowish bill. How do you distinguish this species from the closely related Clark’s Grebe? Order Procellariiformes Family Diomedeidae - Gliding birds of the open ocean. Bill large, hooked, covered with horny plates. Albatross, much larger than gulls or shearwaters. No specimens Family Procellariidae - shearwaters, fulmars, and large petrels. Gull-sized birds of open sea. Bills thin (except fulmars) with tube-like external nostrils, fused together (fulmar) or separate (shearwaters). Wings narrower than a gull's, tail smaller, not as fan shaped. Northern Fulmar (Fulmarus glacialis) mount TC-M82. What single character immediately separates this bird from gulls? Southern Giant Petrel (Macronectes giganteus) skull only. Where are the salt glands on this specimen? Greater Shearwater (Puffinus gravis) mount. Sooty Shearwater (Puffinus griseus) mount, TC-M83. Both hanging mounts in the lab plus an isolated wing Why are these birds known as the tubenoses? Family Hydrobatidae – storm-petrels. Little dark birds that flit erratically over the open sea, at times "running" or "dancing" briefly on the surface with slender legs, dangling webbed feet. No specimens in lab, look at pictures in your field guide. Order Sphenisciformes Family Spheniscidae – penguins, flightless seabirds with wings modified as flippers and used for underwater propulsion. Entirely Southern Hemisphere in distribution, but occur up to the Equator in the Galapagos Islands. Penguin (Pygoscelis sp.) skull and wing examples. Can you find evidence for flightlessness in these bones? What diving adaptations do you see? Adélie Penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae) skin. 3 Order Pelecaniformes Family Sulidae - Boobies. Large seabirds with large, pointed bills and tails; shaped somewhat like fat cigars. No external nares on bill. Larger than most gulls, with a "pointed at both ends" look in flight; neck longer. Fish by high plunges. Northern Gannet (Morus bassanus) skin. Note the absence of external nares, an adaptation for plunge diving. Family Phalacrocoracidae - Cormorants. Large, black or black and white aquatic birds, long slender bill with hook at end; often perch upright on rocks or posts, sometimes with wings held out. Flocks fly in wedge or line formation, some species feed in flocks on water. How do these birds differ from loons? Double-crested Cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus) Skin and mount TC-M84. Note the two crests on the head. Has u-shaped neck in flight. This species is the most wide spread of the North American cormorants and is found on inland freshwater lakes as well as coastal regions. Note the dull, lighter plumage of the immature birds. Family Pelecanidae - Huge water birds with long flat bills and great throat pouches (flat when deflated). Neck long, body robust. Sexes alike. Feed mostly on fish and crustaceans. No specimens available. Family Anhingidae – Anhingas. No specimens, though the Anhinga (Anhinga anhinga), the only species that occurs in North America, may be seen on lakes in and around Wilmington in summer and early fall. Family Fregatidae – Frigatebirds Magnificent Frigatebird (Fregata magnificens) mount TC-M85. Note the characteristic bill and head shape; wings crooked in flight. Frequently follows ships; kleptoparasite; occasional vagrant to coast of North Carolina, especially after tropical storms and hurricanes. Order Ciconiiformes Family Ardeidae – Herons, egrets, and bitterns. Small to large wading birds with long necks, long legs, spearlike bills. In sustained flight, heads are tucked back in an “S” shape; legs trail behind; wing beats slow and labored. At rest, neck may be erect or "pulled in" (e.g., Black-crowned Night Heron) American Bittern (Botaurus lentiginosus) mount TC-M86. Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias) skin. Note the large size, plumage characteristics. Snowy Egret (Egretta thula) skin. How would you distinguish this species from a Cattle Egret and a Great Egret? Great Egret (Ardea alba) skin. Note the bill and leg colors compared to Snowy Egret. Cattle Egret (Bubulcus ibis) skin. Green Heron (Butorides striatus) skin Black-crowned Night Heron (Nycticorax nycticorax), one adult and one juvenile skin. 4 Family Threskiornithidae – Ibises, wading birds with long downward curved bills used for probling in mud and wet ground (often seen on athletic field on campus after rains to get worms). Fly in lines with neck extended. White Ibis (Eudocimus albus), adult and immature. Family Ciconiidae – storks. No specimens. One species, the Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) occurs in the southeastern U. S. Does not breed in North Carolina, but may be seen in the southeastern portion of the state in summer; roosts by Twin Lakes at Sunset Beach until late fall each year. Family Vulturidae (Cathartidae) – vultures. Turkey Vulture (Cathartes aura) mounts TC-M86 and M91 (juvenile). How do you distinguish this species from the Black Vulture in flight? Order Anseriformes Family Anatidae - Swans, geese, and ducks. This order is well represented in our collections. Examine the specimens for differences in bill shape, coloration and sexual variations in plumage. Ducks can be very difficult to identify outside the breeding season when they lose their breeding plumage and obtain their “eclipse” plumage. Tundra Swan (Cygnus columbianus) mount TC-M9. Note features, besides large size, that distinguish this species from a Snow Goose (Chen caerulescens). Canada Goose (Branta canadensis) mount TC-M28 & TC-M29. Cackling Goose (Branta nutchissi) mount TC-M6. Brant (Branta bernicula) mount TC-M5. How can you distinguish these last two species? Wood Duck (Aix sponsa) female specimen (see field guide for male characters). Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) male skin only. Probably the most common duck that you will see anywhere in the U.S. A surface feeding duck. American Black Duck (Anas rubripes) male skin plus mount TC-M36. American Wigeon (Anas americana) male and female skins plus mount TC-M16, 37,38. Gadwall (Anas strepera) male skin plus female mount TC-M8. Northern Pintail (Anas acuta) male and female skins plus mount TC-M17, 41. Northern Shoveler (Anas clypeata) male skin. Note the unmistakable bill morphology. Green-winged Teal (Anas crecca) adult male and molting male skins plus mount TC-M25. Our smallest North American Duck Blue-winged Teal (Anas discors) female skin and male mount TC-M12. Canvasback (Aythya valisineria) male skin and mount TC-M27. Redhead (Aythya americana) male skin, male and female mounts TC-M13, 14. Lesser Scaup (Aythya affinis) one male skin and female mount TC-M42. Ring-necked Duck (Aythya collaris) one male skin All of the above are diving ducks. How do
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Highly Conservative Pattern of Sex Chromosome Synapsis and Recombination in Neognathae Birds
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Highly Conservative Pattern of Sex Chromosome Synapsis and Recombination in Neognathae Birds Anna Torgasheva 1,2 , Lyubov Malinovskaya 1,2, Kira S. Zadesenets 1, Anastasia Slobodchikova 1,2, Elena Shnaider 3, Nikolai Rubtsov 1,2 and Pavel Borodin 1,2,* 1 Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia; [email protected] (A.T.); [email protected] (L.M.); [email protected] (K.S.Z.); [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (N.R.) 2 Department of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia 3 Bird of Prey Rehabilitation Centre, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: We analyzed the synapsis and recombination between Z and W chromosomes in the oocytes of nine neognath species: domestic chicken Gallus gallus domesticus, grey goose Anser anser, black tern Chlidonias niger, common tern Sterna hirundo, pale martin Riparia diluta, barn swallow Hirundo rustica, European pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca, great tit Parus major and white wagtail Motacilla alba using immunolocalization of SYCP3, the main protein of the lateral elements of the synaptonemal complex, and MLH1, the mismatch repair protein marking mature recombination nodules. In all species examined, homologous synapsis occurs in a short region of variable size at the ends of Z and W chromosomes, where a single recombination nodule is located. The remaining Citation: Torgasheva, A.; parts of the sex chromosomes undergo synaptic adjustment and synapse non-homologously. In 25% Malinovskaya, L.; Zadesenets, K.S.; of ZW bivalents of white wagtail, synapsis and recombination also occur at the secondary pairing Slobodchikova, A.; Shnaider, E.; Rubtsov, N.; Borodin, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixteen Vetted Fossil Calibrations for Divergence Dating of Charadriiformes (Aves, Neognathae)
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Sixteen vetted fossil calibrations for divergence dating of Charadriiformes (Aves, Neognathae) N. Adam Smith ABSTRACT The Charadriiformes (shorebirds and allies) are an ecologically and morphologi- cally diverse clade with a global geographic distribution. The perceived antiquity of this lineage and the cryptic plumage and morphology of some charadriiforms have made them a frequent focus of study by ornithologists. Likewise, with the relatively recent advent of molecular sequence based divergence estimation methods, no less than seven studies have estimated the timing of cladogenetic events in Charadriiformes. Unfortunately, all of those studies have suffered from poor choice and characterization (i.e., age and taxonomic assignment) of fossil calibrations used for divergence time analysis. Given that studies of both real and simulated data have demonstrated the potential for calibration choice to bias node age estimates, the results of previously published analyses of divergence times for Charadriiformes must, accordingly, be viewed with caution. To alleviate introduction of fossil calibration bias with respect to future analyses of divergence times including Charadriiformes, 16 rigorously evaluated charadriiform fossil calibrations are reported herein. N. Adam Smith. The National Evolutionary Synthesis Center, 2024 W. Main St., Suite A200, Durham, NC, 27705, U.S.A., [email protected] KEYWORDS: Charadrii; minimum age constraints; Pan-Alcidae; Lari; Scolopaci; seabirds and shorebirds INTRODUCTION forms were previously considered a basal neorni- thine lineage and were influential in the Charadriiformes (shorebirds and allies) are a development of the largely refuted ‘transitional globally distributed clade including more than 360 shorebird’ hypothesis (Olson, 1985; Feduccia, morphologically and ecologically diverse species 1996), dating cladogenetic events in Charadrii- (del Hoyo et al., 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Columbiformes ~ Pterocliformes ~ Mesitornithiformes
    Birds of the World part 2 Galloanseres, Neoaves: Columbea NEOGNATHAE (the rest of the birds!): Galloanseres • ORDER ANSERIFORMES – waterfowl • Family Anhimidae – screamers (3 species) • Family Anseranatidae – magpie goose (1 species) • Family Anatidae – ducks, geese, and swans (173 species) • ORDER GALLIFORMES – landfowl • Family Megapodiidae – megapodes (21 species) • Family Cracidae – chachalacas, curassows, and guans (55 species) • Family Numididae – guineafowl (6 species) • Family Odontophoridae – New World quail (34 species) • Family Phasianidae – pheasants and allies (183 species) NEOGNATHAE : Neoaves (the rest of the birds!): COLUMBEA • ORDER PODICIPEDIFORMES – Family Podicipedidae – grebes (23 species) • ORDER PHOENICOPTERIFORMES – Family Phoenicopteridae – flamingos (6 species) • ORDER COLUMBIFORMES – Family Columbidae – pigeons and doves (334 species) • ORDER PTEROCLIDIFORMES – Family Pteroclididae – sandgrouse (16 species) • ORDER MESITORNITHIFORMES – Family Mesitornithidae – mesites (3 species) NEOGNATHAE : Galloanseres • ORDER ANSERIFORMES – waterfowl • Family Anhimidae – screamers (3 species) • Family Anseranatidae – magpie goose (1 species) • Family Anatidae – ducks, geese, and swans (173 species) • ORDER GALLIFORMES – landfowl • Family Megapodiidae – megapodes (21 species) • Family Cracidae – chachalacas, curassows, and guans (55 species) • Family Numididae – guineafowl (6 species) • Family Odontophoridae – New World quail (34 species) • Family Phasianidae – pheasants and allies (183 species) southern or crested screamer
    [Show full text]
  • Whole-Genome Analyses Resolve Early Branches in the Tree of Life of Modern Birds Erich D
    AFLOCKOFGENOMES 90. J. F. Storz, J. C. Opazo, F. G. Hoffmann, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. RESEARCH ARTICLE 66, 469–478 (2013). 91. F. G. Hoffmann, J. F. Storz, T. A. Gorr, J. C. Opazo, Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 1126–1138 (2010). Whole-genome analyses resolve ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Genome assemblies and annotations of avian genomes in this study are available on the avian phylogenomics website early branches in the tree of life (http://phybirds.genomics.org.cn), GigaDB (http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5524/101000), National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), and ENSEMBL (NCBI and Ensembl accession numbers of modern birds are provided in table S2). The majority of this study was supported by an internal funding from BGI. In addition, G.Z. was 1 2 3 4,5,6 7 supported by a Marie Curie International Incoming Fellowship Erich D. Jarvis, *† Siavash Mirarab, * Andre J. Aberer, Bo Li, Peter Houde, grant (300837); M.T.P.G. was supported by a Danish National Cai Li,4,6 Simon Y. W. Ho,8 Brant C. Faircloth,9,10 Benoit Nabholz,11 Research Foundation grant (DNRF94) and a Lundbeck Foundation Jason T. Howard,1 Alexander Suh,12 Claudia C. Weber,12 Rute R. da Fonseca,6 grant (R52-A5062); C.L. and Q.L. were partially supported by a 4 4 4 4 7,13 14 Danish Council for Independent Research Grant (10-081390); Jianwen Li, Fang Zhang, Hui Li, Long Zhou, Nitish Narula, Liang Liu, and E.D.J. was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute Ganesh Ganapathy,1 Bastien Boussau,15 Md.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Diversity of Birds 2015
    Ornithology NREM/ZOOL 4464 Dr. Tim O’Connell Spring 2015 A Classification of Birds of the World – Laboratory Investigations As students of Ornithology, a primary objective for you is to develop a working knowledge of the diversity of birds of the world. As you internalize this information, you will develop a deep appreciation for the central role that evolution plays as the driver of biological diversity. We begin this week in Lab to really explore the diversity of birds through in-depth examination of orders and families. Avian classification is fluid: the ordering and alliance of families and orders differs according to different authorities and new information is continually becoming available that enhances our ability to discern relationships; this results in updated classifications. You are embarking on this voyage during a time of significant taxonomic revision, and much of what you will learn in Lab supersedes classification systems in your field guides. Different authorities (usually committees) often disagree in their assessment of a taxon. Where one authority might recognize a full species, another might recognize it as a subspecies of some other species. Higher-level assignments are tricky too, e.g., some place the South American rheas in their own order (Rheiformes) whereas others lump it in with other ostrich-like birds in Struthioniformes. The American Ornithologists’ Union manages two committees (North American and South American Classification Committees) that review information and render decisions on which taxonomic proposals will be recognized. Each July, the AOU publishes updates to its official checklist. That checklist is commonly accessed via a massive book containing information on distribution, evolutionary affinities, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Diversification of Birds
    Current Biology Review The Origin and Diversification of Birds Stephen L. Brusatte1,*, Jingmai K. O’Connor2,*, and Erich D. Jarvis3,4,* 1School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Grant Institute, King’s Buildings, James Hutton Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FE, UK 2Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 3Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA 4Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] (S.L.B.), [email protected] (J.K.O.), [email protected] (E.D.J.) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.003 Birds are one of the most recognizable and diverse groups of modern vertebrates. Over the past two de- cades, a wealth of new fossil discoveries and phylogenetic and macroevolutionary studies has transformed our understanding of how birds originated and became so successful. Birds evolved from theropod dino- saurs during the Jurassic (around 165–150 million years ago) and their classic small, lightweight, feathered, and winged body plan was pieced together gradually over tens of millions of years of evolution rather than in one burst of innovation. Early birds diversified throughout the Jurassic and Cretaceous, becoming capable fliers with supercharged growth rates, but were decimated at the end-Cretaceous extinction alongside their close dinosaurian relatives. After the mass extinction, modern birds (members of the avian crown group) explosively diversified, culminating in more than 10,000 species distributed worldwide today. Introduction dinosaurs Dromaeosaurus albertensis or Troodon formosus.This Birds are one of the most conspicuous groups of animals in the clade includes all living birds and extinct taxa, such as Archaeop- modern world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bony Palate of Birds. Part I the Palaeognathae
    520 McDowaLL,Bony Palate of Birds [AukLOct. MIRANDA RIBEIRO, PAULO DE 1929. Da nidifica•o de Chaetura½inereiventris. Bol. Mus. Nac. [Rio], 4: 101-105. RIDGWAY, R. 1911. The birds of North and Middle America. Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus., 50 (5): 684. Stcx, H. 1947a. O ninho de Panyptila cayennehals(Gmelin) e algumas observag6escom- pilat6rias s6bre a ecologiade outros andorinh6esBrasileiros. Rev. Bras. Biologla, 7: 219-246. 1947b. The nesting of Reinarda squamata(Cassin). The Auk, 65 (2): 169-174, pl. 6. WI•)-N•vw•), Paz•z Mix. zv 1821. Reise nach Brasilien, 2: ?$. 1850. Beitraege zur Kenntnls der Vogelwelt Brasiliens,5: 347-$51. Fu•da•5o Brasil Ceutral Av. Nilo Pelauha 25 Rio de Jauei•o, Brazil THE BONY PALATE OF BIRDS. PART I THE PALAEOGNATHAE BY SAM MCDOWELL Tins is the first in a seriesof papers in which the author intends to describe the osteologyof the known birds with the end in mind of throwing morelight on their highersystematics. I have chosenas my first topic the bony palate becauseof the stresslaid upon this part of the avian skeletonfrom Cornay to the present in the classification of birds. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author is deeply indebted to Dr. Ernst Mayr of the American Museum of Natural History for his generousencouragement and wise advice;to Dr. GeorgeGaylord Simpson,Curator of FossilMammals and Birds of the same institution, for his invaluable suggestionsand commentaries on the preliminary draft of this paper; to Mr. R. deSchauenseeand Mr. James Bond of the Academy of Natural Sciencesof Philadelphiafor generouslyallowing the author the use of the Academy's skeletal material; to Messrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Exercise 14 Aves: Observations and Classification of Specimens
    EXERCISE 14 AVES: OBSERVATIONS AND CLASSIFICATION OF SPECIMENS Structure 14.1 Introduction Objectives 14.2 Material Required 14.3 General Characters and Classification of Aves 14.4 Observation of Museum Specimens Milvus migrans Bubo bubo Dicrurus adsimilis Dendrocopos mehrattensis Psittacula eupatria Eudynamys scolopacea 14.5 Terminal Questions 14.1 INTRODUCTION Birds occupy all continents, oceans and islands, penetrating the Arctic and the Antarctic and live from sea level to above timberline on the Everest. They are well adapted to migratory habits. They are the best known and most easily recognised animals being unique in having feathers for flying and also cover to insulate their bodies and provide them with distinctive colouration. The body weight is reduced for flight by elimination of some bones and fusion of others and by presence of some air filled cavities and spaces in many bones. High metabolic rate, and raised body temperature, strong flight muscles and advanced respiratory mechanism with air sacs and lungs provide necessary strength for the flight. They have highly developed voice, sight and hearing but poor sense of smell. Class Aves is made up of 28 orders of living birds and a few fossil orders. More than 9600 species have been named so far and only a few species remain to be discovered. Of the 28 orders, four or five (depending on the classification system) are ratitae or flightless birds, the remaining orders are carinate birds with keeled sternum. In this exercise you will observe and classify some representative specimens of class Aves. You are advised to come prepared for this exercise by reading Unit 16 of Block 4, Animal Diversity course.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Evolutionary Rates Using Discrete Morphological Characters: a Case
    Estimating evolutionary rates using discrete morphological characters: a case study with birds Luke Barrett Harrison Department of Biology McGill University, Montreal April 2013 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Luke Harrison 2013 DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis to my wife, Soo Bin Chun. I would not have been able to do it without you nor would I have wanted to. semper fidelis & love always TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT / RÉSUMÉ 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 5 PREFACE 7 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 10 CHAPTER 1: Estimating Evolutionary Rates of Discrete Morphological Characters Introduction 14 Rates of Phenotypic Evolution 15 Traits, Characters, and Discrete Morphological Characters 16 Heterogeneity in Rates Between Discrete Morphological Characters in Phylogenetic Analysis 18 Absolute Rates of Evolution of Discrete Morphological Characters 20 Westoll (1949) 22 Forey (1988) 22 Cloutier (1991) 23 Wagner (1997) 23 Bromham et al. (2002) 24 Ruta et al. (2006) 24 Brusatte et al. (2008) 25 Roelants et al. (2011) 25 Lloyd et al. (2012) 27 Summary of Previous Methods and Future Directions 28 Appropriate Null Models 28 Likelihood-based Methods for Estimating Morphological Evolutionary Rates: Potential Advantages 29 An Ideal Model-based Framework for Estimating Absolute Rates of Evolution of Discrete Morphological Characters 30 Conclusions 31 CONNECTING TEXT 32 CHAPTER 2: Among-Character Rate Variation in Phylogenetic Analysis of Discrete Morphological Characters: Prevalence and
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary Note: in General, Terms Have Been Defined As They Apply to Birds
    Glossary Note: In general, terms have been defined as they apply to birds. Nevertheless, many terms (especially those naming basic ana- tomical structures or biological principles) apply to a range of living things beyond birds. In most cases, terms that apply only to birds are noted as such. Most terms that are bolded in the text of the Handbook of Bird Biology appear here. Numbers in brackets following each entry give the primary pages on which the term is defined. Please note that this glossary is also available on the Internet at <www.birds.cornell.edu/homestudy>. aerodynamic valve: A vortex-like movement of air within the air A tubes of each avian lung, at the junction between the mesobron- abdominal air sacs: A pair of air sacs in the abdominal region chus and the first secondary bronchus; it prevents the backflow of birds that may have connections into the bones of the pelvis of air into the mesobronchus by forcing the incoming air along and femur; their position within the abdominal cavity may shift the mesobronchus and into the posterior air sacs. [4·102] during the day to maintain the bird’s streamlined shape during African barbets: A family (Lybiidae, 42 species) of small, color- digestion and egg laying. [4·101] ful, stocky African birds with large, sometimes serrated, beaks; abducent nerve: The sixth cranial nerve; it stimulates a muscle they dig their nest cavities in trees, earthen banks, or termite of the eyeball and two skeletal muscles that move the nictitating nests. [1·85] membrane across the eyeball.
    [Show full text]
  • Cretaceous Bird with Dinosaur Skull Sheds Light on Avian Cranial Evolution ✉ Min Wang 1,2 , Thomas A
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24147-z OPEN Cretaceous bird with dinosaur skull sheds light on avian cranial evolution ✉ Min Wang 1,2 , Thomas A. Stidham1,2,3, Zhiheng Li1,2, Xing Xu1,2 & Zhonghe Zhou1,2 The transformation of the bird skull from an ancestral akinetic, heavy, and toothed dino- saurian morphology to a highly derived, lightweight, edentulous, and kinetic skull is an innovation as significant as powered flight and feathers. Our understanding of evolutionary 1234567890():,; assembly of the modern form and function of avian cranium has been impeded by the rarity of early bird fossils with well-preserved skulls. Here, we describe a new enantiornithine bird from the Early Cretaceous of China that preserves a nearly complete skull including the palatal elements, exposing the components of cranial kinesis. Our three-dimensional reconstruction of the entire enantiornithine skull demonstrates that this bird has an akinetic skull indicated by the unexpected retention of the plesiomorphic dinosaurian palate and diapsid temporal configurations, capped with a derived avialan rostrum and cranial roof, highlighting the highly modular and mosaic evolution of the avialan skull. 1 Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. 2 CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. 3 University of Chinese Academy of ✉ Sciences, Beijing, China. email: [email protected] NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:3890 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24147-z | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24147-z he evolutionary patterns and modes from their first global- maxillary process tapers into an elongate dorsal ramus that scale diversification during the Mesozoic to the overlays a ventral notch and sits in a groove on the lateral surface T 15 >10,000 species of living birds with their great diversity of of the maxilla.
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic List of the Major Groups of Birds -With Indications of North American Families
    A Taxonomic List of the Major Groups of Birds -with indications of North American families By David Lahti 2/2016 Following are the major groups of birds, as they have been designated so far, focusing especially on the Orders and Families of the current birds of the world, and designating (with underlines) families represented in North and Violet sabrewing Campylopterus Middle America. hemileucurus (Apodiformes: Trochilidae). Monteverde, Costa Rica (April Lahti, 2008). Avialans and extinct birds: A brief nested lineage is presented initially that starts with the Avialans—those dinosaurs believed to be more closely related to birds than to other dinos such as Deinonychus. Extinct fossil bird groups are presented mostly according to Chiappe (2001, 2002) and Sereno (2005). Until we get to modern birds (Neornithes), I have not represented groups as orders or families, because the most reliable paleontological data is still presented largely only at the level of genus. Some researchers (and researchers from some cultures in particlular) are apt to ascribe order status to their fossil finds, but it is very possible that nearly every genus discovered in the Jurassic and Cretaceous, at least, merits order status. Therefore I have avoided dividing genera into families and orders, and mentioned only the number of genera that have been described. Among modern birds, Neornithes, the vast majority of fossil and subfossil finds are thought to be consistent with contemporary orders; thus only four extinct orders are listed here, each designated by a dagger (†). Two of them (Lithornithiformes and Gastornithiformes) went extinct before the historical period, so are listed in the introductory ancient lineage; the other two (Dinornithiformes and Aepyornithiformes) went extinct in the historical period (because of humans), and so are in the main list.
    [Show full text]