DOCSLIB.ORG

John S. Gustin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
John S. Gustin ANCESTRY OF JOHN S. GUSTIN AND HIS WIFE SUSAN McCOMB, INCWDI:IW AN ACCOUNT OF JOHN HUBBARD, SECOND HUSBAND OF ELINOR SHEPHERD. BY Mils. SARAH A. DEWICK. BOSTON: DAVID CLAPP & SON, 19 00, CONTENTS. ifHE MAKEPEACE FAMILY • 5 THE BROWNE FAMILY 13 ANCESTRY OF JOHNS. GusTIN (on the paternal side) 17 THE OWEN FAMILY 41 THE PRICE F AMIL y 47 ANCESTRY OF JORN S. Gus TIN ( on the maternal side) 53 CAPTAIN ELISHA SHEPHERD 55 THE SMOCK F AMIL y • 59 THE CONOVER OR VAN CouwENHOVEN FAMILY 63 THE SCHENCK FAMILY 69 JOHN HUBBARD 73 Ancestry of Susan McComb:­ THE LEGGETT FAMILY 79 OSBERNE THE SENESCHAL 95 THE MANDEVILLE, DE Rm AND Roos FAMILIES 101 RICHARD LAWREN CE 107 THE MACOMB FAMILY 117 JOHN MOTT 129 INDEX 131 THE MAKEPEACE FAMILY. MAKEPEACE F .1-\.MILY. N the history. of" Old Dorchester" the name .of 'Mr. Thomas Makepeace is among those who came in 1635, from Lon­ I don ; but the writer of the Makepeace genealogy thinks he did not come till 1637, and then from Bristol, England, because the five . Proprietors ( of whom he was one) of the Dover., N. H., and Swampscot patents were of Bristol or Shrewsbury. The proprietors were Thomas Makepeace, George Willys, Robert* Saltonstall, William "Whiting, and Edward Holyoke. The patents embraced in them from the "sea side" ( near where Portsmouth now is) "and coming round the said land by the ryver unto the Falls of Quamscot" which includes what is now Dover, N. H. Mr. Makepeace was one of the five partners who petitioned the "General Court" to have both patents, and the jurisdiction of the people dwelling within the limits of these patents, come under the government of the Massachusetts, which was granted. The History of Dorchester says : "Mr. Thomas Makepeace came in all probability in 1635. He was a member of the Ancient and Honorable Artillery in 1638, and had the title of 'Mr., and appears to have been a man of some importance. Had two sons, Thomas and vVilliam." Notwithstanding the above extract, the writer of the genealogy (vVilliam Makepeace, 1857) is strongly of the opinion that Mr. Makepeace did not leave England till the year 1637, when he settled in Boston, He quotes from Belknap's History of New Hampshire which * Second son of Sir Richard, who came with some of his family to Salem in 1630. 8 GENEALOGIES. says respecting the Dover patent that "two thirds of this patent belonged to some merchants of Bristol the other third to some of Shrewsbury." And the same history says that "those of Bristol had sold their interest to the Lords Say and Broke, George vVillys and vVilliam ..Whiting," etc. As the other pro­ prietors of the patent were Mr. Makepeace, Robert Saltonstall and Edward Holyoke, he (William Makepeace) thinks Mr. Makepeace was from Bristol or vicinity, and had no connection with the "second emigration" which came from England in 1635 and settled in Dorchester. And he says: "Besides if Mr. Makepeace had been one of the settlers in Dorchester from 1635 to 1G37, would the authorities of the town of Boston, on his removal there only from Dorchester, be likely to have grant­ ed him as they did 'September 25th 1637' 'a house plot and garden place,' for him a settlement in their towne? In a book called a 'Transcript of Boston Records,' Vol. 1. p. 45, 1637 (Ci1y Clerk's Office) is the following. 'The 25th of the 7th month Sept. 1637. At a meeting, this day, of Thomas Olyvar, Thomas Leveritt, ·William Hutchinson, ..William Coulborne, John Coggeshall, John Sanford, ·w illiam Balstone, and ,James Penne ;-it is agreed that_ Mr. Thomas Makepeace shall have a house plot, and garden place.' This house and garden were in Hanover St., near Court St., and probably not far from where the Concert Hall was in 1857 ." Thomas Makepeace appears to have been a person of some importance and considerable wealth. In the " Transcript of Boston Records" is the following :- The 25 th day of the 1st month called March, 1639 Further at this meeting it appeared by a writing dated the first day of August 1(338, that Mr. John Underhill hath surrendered unto Mr. Thomas Make­ peace of Dorchester, his house in Boston, ·with :m hundred acres of upland ground at Muddy River (Brookline) and ten acres of meadow or marsh ground there, and his share of woodlands in the Islands, with a garden at the house, and another behii1d Mr. Parker's house to the quantity of half an acre and somewhat more, and also near half an acre upon the Fort Hill for the sum of an hundred pounds. From ":Massachusetts Records " : " 1641 June 2. Mr. ,T ohn Oliver, :Mr. Edward Alleyn --Willi: Parks are appointed to view, )fAKEPEACE FAMILY. 9 and settle Mr. Makepeace his farm of 200 acres." At this time, 1641, Mr. Makepeace lived in Dorchester, where he owned land. The same year he married Mrs. Elizabeth Mellowes of Boston for his second wife. In the records of the First Church, Boston, is found the following:- The 25 th day of ye 5th mon. 1641 Mrs. Elizabeth Makepeace, lately called 1\lrs. Eliza. Mellowes, but now ye wife of Mr. 1\Iakepeace Dor­ chester, was granted lve of Recommendation thether That is to the church in Dorchester. Mr. Makepeace was evidently too broad in his religious views for those times. Extract from History of Dorchester:- A church was gathered this year (1638) at Weymouth under the sanction of the proper anthorities, and Mr. Lenthial, who appeared to have been in advance of his time in liberality, caused some of the elders to suppose that he had imbibed some of the errors of Mrs. Hutchin­ son. They determ_ined to check the error in the bud, and Mr. Lenthial was therefore called before the General Court to retract his opinions, and some of his friends were punished. Some of the Dorchester people seemed to have been under mt1ch excitement about this matter, "for two of our Mr.'s, a title of no small significance in those days, were brought before the Court, and Mr. Ambrose Martin for calling the church covenant a stinki11g carrion and a human invention and saying he wondered at God's patience, feared it would end in the sharp, and said the ministers did dethrone Christ and set up themselves, was fined £10, and counselled to go to Mr. Mather to be instructed by him." Likewise Mr. Thomas :\fakepeace, because of his novel dis­ position, was informed "We were weary of him unless he re­ formed." (Writer of History.) At this day the record of the court appeared as novel to us as did to them the disposition of Mr. Makepeace. In H554 Mr. Makepeace was in the "Narraganset Expedition" against the Indians, for which he received pay from the treasury of the Massachusetts Bay. He took much interest in free schools. In 1641 he, with the other owners, conveyed the whole of the rents and profits of Thompson's Island to the town of Dorchester for the support of a free school. 10 GENEALOGIES. From the Suffolk Registry of Deeds (Book ii., p. 218) :­ Thomas Makepeace to Roger "Williams, both of Dorchester "7 acres of land (in or ni) the great neck called Dorchester Neck," &c. The consideration £21-" 13th llmo. Anno 1648." Signed and delivered THO:il'1AS MAKEPEACE, in the presence of RoGER ·WILLIAMS, Thomas Makepeace (his eldest son). This writing aoknowledged by the within named Thomas Makepeace to be his Act and deed; this 5th day of January 1655. Before me. R1: BELLINGHA3I Dept Govr Entered and recorded the 21st January 1655. Enw. RA wsoN, Recorder; Among the early records of Boston can be found the follow­ ing: "Jno Brown was marryed to Ester Makepeace, the daughter of Thomas Makepeace of Boston, 23, 2. 55. By Hum: Atherton." For an account of the marriages of his other children see the Makepeace Genealogy, page 15. Elizabeth, daughter of ,Tno. and Ester Browne, married John Gustine. ( See Gustin pedigree.) Thomas Makepeace died in Boston, January or February, 1667. His will, dated Boston, June 30, 1666, is on record in the Probate Office in Boston. This will, a very long one, can be found in thB Makepeace Geneaology, p. 15. Extracts:- " I give and bequeath unto Thomas Makepeace mine eldest sonn beyond the seas, and to his heirs forever the debt of fifty pounds which be oweth mee, for which encl I have torn off the seal of his bill, and noe more, because I have given him his portion formerly, vizt. the house and land in England, he being the heir to it which he hath long possessed." He gives to each of his daughters three pounds, and the debts their husbands owe him. To each of his grandchildren he gives ten pounds to be given to the males when they come of age ( 21 yrs.) or clay of marriage, which comes first. To the females when they come of age ( 18 yrs.) or clay of marriage, which comes first. He appoints his wife Elizabeth, daughter 1Vaitawhile, and her husband, Josiah Cooper of Boston, his executors and executrixes, and directs that after all debts clue and owed are received and paid that the rest shall be divided in three equal parts among his executors. In witness whereof I have hereunto put my hand and seale, in Bos- MAKE.FEACE FAMILY. 11 ton, this 30th day of June, in the eighteenth yeare of the Reign of our sovereign Lord Charles the Second 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RICR Codification of Ocean SAMP Ch. 4
    RHODE ISLAND GOVERNMENT REGISTER PUBLIC NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING AGENCY: Coastal Resources Management Council (CRMC) RULE IDENTIFIER: 650-RICR-20-05-4; ERLID # 6892 REGULATION TITLE: Coastal Resources Management Program – Ocean Special Area Management Plan – Chapter 4 – Cultural and Historic Resources RULEMAKING ACTION: Direct Final Direct Final: The Coastal Resources Management Council does not expect the proposed RICR codification to be controversial, and if no formal objection has been received on or before August 17, 2018, the proposed rule will take effect thirty (30) days after publication. TYPE OF FILING: Amendment TIMETABLE FOR ACTION ON THE PROPOSED RULE: Public Notice Date: July 17, 2018 End of Comment Period: August 18, 2018 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED RULE: In 2016, the legislature passed an amendment to R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-35-5(b) that required the Secretary of State to oversee the publication of an updated uniform code of state regulations. The purpose of this proposed rule is to reformat the regulatory section of Chapter 4 – Cultural and Historic Resources of the Ocean Special Area Management Plan (SAMP) and codify the rules in accordance with the new uniform code of state regulations, called the Rhode Island Code of Regulations (“RICR”). There are no substantive changes to the existing regulations. CRMC will issue a guidance document in accordance with R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-35-1(9) and 42-35-2.12, titled “Ocean SAMP guidance document”, to provide helpful information to assist with compliance with this regulation [650-RICR-20-05-4]. The Ocean SAMP guidance document contains the findings, scientific data and other information relative to the Ocean SAMP and can be found by accessing the CRMC’s guidance document index on the CRMC’s webpage [www.crmc.ri.gov] or the Secretary of State’s guidance document index.
    [Show full text]
  • NJDARM: Collection Guide
    NJDARM: Collection Guide - NEW JERSEY STATE ARCHIVES COLLECTION GUIDE Record Group: Department of Defense Subgroup: Adjutant General's Office (Revolutionary War) Series: Quartermaster and Commissary Generals' Records, United States Continental Army, 1776-1789 Accession #: Unknown Series #: SDEA1014 Guide Date: Pre-1989; rev. 9/2004 (LB) Volume: 1 c.f. [2 boxes] Content Note | Contents | Reel List Institutional History During the revolutionary war, the system for provisioning the Continental army was almost continually reorganized as Congress sought to ameliorate chronic shortages through administrative rearrangements. The following account briefly summarizes the history of the army's procurement system, concentrating on those periods for which the archives' holdings are most complete. For more information consult the attached bibliography and the archives' research file pertaining to this collection. As a first step in organizing a supply apparatus, the Continental Congress created the offices of the Quartermaster General and the Commissary General on June 16, 1775. The Quartermaster General was responsible for transporting and delivering supplies, establishing the order of battle, regulating the marches and arranging camps. The Commissary General, on the other hand, was responsible for procuring food. Because of their dependency on one another they often overlapped in performing their duties. In August 1777, following a period in which the army suffered severe shortages, Congress expanded the Commissary General's department to include two new positions: a Commissary of Purchase and a Commissary of Issues. When the army moved from Brandywine to Germantown in September 1777, the Commissary of Issues established temporary magazines along the route, giving orders for the Quartermasters to issue several days provisions to the men.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Crucial Days Order of Battle
    The following tables are from TEN CRUCIAL DAYS: Washington's Vision for Victory Unfolds by William L. Kidder (Knox Press) 2019 ©All Rights Reserved American Troops in South Jersey – December 25, 1776 Griffin’s Brigade, New Jersey Militia (Col. Samuel Griffin, Virginia) - 497 1st Cumberland County Regiment (Col. Silas Newcomb) 2nd Cumberland County Regiment (Col. David Potter) 1st Gloucester County Regiment (Col. Enos Seeley) 2nd Gloucester County Regiment (Col. Joseph Ellis) Captain Zephaniah Steelman, Forest Belanger, James Giberson 3rd Gloucester County Regiment (Col. Richard Somers) 1st Salem County Regiment (Col. Samuel Dick) 2nd Salem County Regiment (Col. John Holme) Virginia Artillery (2 companies) Source: Smith, Trenton, 29. ALL NEW JERSEY MILITIA REGIMENTS were in disarray in December 1776 due to structural changes made during the months of the New York campaign and the formation of the five-month levies, whose enlistments expired at the end of November. All these regiments should be considered as partial and commanding officers may not have been present. 1 British Troops at Trenton and Bordentown area on December 25, 1776 Trenton Rall’s Hessian Brigade (Col. Johann Rall) –1382 Rall Regiment (Lt. Col. Balthasar Brethauer) – 512 effective Major Johann Matthaeus, Captain Henrich Bocking, Lieutenant Colonel Batthas Brethauer, Captain Johann Brubach, Lieutenant Johann Sternickle Knyphausen Regiment (Maj. Friedrich Ludwig von Dechow) – 429 effective Major Friedrich von Dechow, Captain Friedrich von Biesenrodt, Lieutenant Andreas Wiederholdt, Henrich Kothe, Corporal Kustner Von Lossberg Regiment (Lt. Col. Francis Scheffer) – 345 Major Ludwig von Hanstein, Captain Ernst Altenbockum, Staff Captain Friedrich Wilhelm von Benning, Captain Emanuel von Wilmousky, Lieutenant George Christian Kimm, Lieutenant Jacob Piel, Lieutenant Ernst Schwabe, Second Lieutenant Georg Hermann Zoll, Ensign Friedrich Grabe, Ensign Christian von Hobe, Friedrich Hartmann, Kurt Mensing, Philip Obenhausen, Freidrich Wilhelm Oliva Jagers, 1 company (Capt.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of ROCKAWAY TOWNSHIP by JAMES H. NEIGHBOUR. THIS Township Lies in the Northeastern Part of the County and Embraces More
    HISTORY OF ROCKAWAY TOWNSHIP BY JAMES H. NEIGHBOUR. THIS township lies in the northeastern part of the county and embraces more territory by over 3,000 acres than any other township in the county. Its length from Newfoundland to Shongum is about twenty miles, and its width from Powerville to the Jefferson township line near Luxemburg is about twelve miles. It was erected in 1844 from parts of Pequannock and Hanover townships, by an act of the Legislature, and made the eleventh township in the county. The principal part was taken from Pequannock, or from "Old Pequannock" as it is frequently called because Pequannock has existed since the year 1740 as a separate and distinct township. The history of Rockaway township prior to 1844 will naturally apply to those parts of Pequannock and Hanover up to that date. This township was settled principally by the Hollanders; at least there were many families of that nationality in the lower or eastern part of the township, who came there about 1715. In the act of 1844 creating the township of Rockaway the boundaries are given as follows: "Beginning at the bridge over the Pequannock River, at Charlottenburg iron works, and thence running a straight line to the north end of the county bridge first above Elijah D. Scott’s forge at Powerville; and to include all that part of Hanover that may lie to the north and west of said line; thence a straight line to the center of the natural pond in Parsippany woods called Green’s Pond; thence a straight line to the corner of the townships of Morris, Hanover and
    [Show full text]
  • The Two Battles of Trenton
    CHAPTER III The Two Battles of Trenton BY FREDERICK L. FERRIS I. The First Battle “NOWHERE in the annals of warfare,” says General William S. Stryker, “can be found a counterpart of the winter campaign of Washington and his army in 1776-77 -that army which left the vicinity of New York a ragged, starved, defeated, demoralized band, which passed through the Jerseys and over the river, then dashed upon the Hessian advance, punished the flank of the British line, doubled on its own bloody tracks through the village of Princeton, and at last marched into quarters an army of victors.” 1 1 The Battles of Trenton and Princeton (Houghton, Mifflin and Company, 1898), p. 1. This is the definitive work dealing with Revolutionary events in Trenton and vicinity. General Stryker was a painstaking and scholarly author who devoted his spare time for twenty-seven years to preparation for his great task and rewrote his manuscript five times. Professor William Starr Myers, of Princeton University, editing the same author’s posthumous work, The Battle of Monmouth, has borne testimony that he found Stryker as an historian “accurate, sound, judicial and scholarly.” Sir George Otto Trevelyan, Baronet, in his authoritative work, The American Revolution, says of Stryker’s commentary on Trenton and Princeton: “A better book on the subject could not be compiled.” Living on the scene of the memorable engagements here, General Stryker from childhood was steeped in local Revolutionary lore. 1 He gathered much of his knowledge almost first-hand from the families of survivors. Quite inevitably, therefore, the author of the present chapter has found it necessary and desirable to lean heavily upon Stryker’s immortal account of the Battles of Trenton as both a factual and an interpretative guide.
    [Show full text]
  • The Charles Stewart Mott Estate One Hundred Years of Stories, 1916–2016 • Susan J
    newhof APPLEWOOD APPLEWOOD The Charles Stewart Mott Estate one hundred years of stories, 1916–2016 • susan j. newhof APPLEWOOD The Charles Stewart Mott Estate C. S. Mott in his home office, February 4, 1960. The living room at Applewood today. Children playing during a public program at Applewood. utomotive pioneer Charles Stewart Mott and his first wife, Ethel Harding In contrast to many, the Motts chose to Applewood has been carefully preserved, Mott, purchased sixty-four acres at the edge of downtown Flint, build their gentleman’s farm within walking fulfilling Ruth Mott’s wish that it be a distance of downtown Flint, not out in the memorial to her cherished husband and Michigan, and laid the cornerstone in 1916 for the family home quiet countryside. They saw value in raising a resource for the community. Come explore The Charles StewartMott Estate Aand gentleman’s farm they called Applewood. the family’s food, eating fresh vegetables, the landscaped grounds and barns, take preserving for later use, and sharing any part in creative hands-on programs, gaze This collection of stories of Applewood’s first one hundred years reveals abundance with those in need. Not concerned up into the canopy of a giant old sugar the private lives of a very public family, much told in their own words. with making grand impressions, the house maple, and learn how to care for the The author weaves excerpts from decades of interviews, personal letters, is modest compared with other auto baron environment. Sample the heirloom apples and C. S. Mott’s detailed diary, plus recollections from family, friends, homes, with a level of comfort and just from the namesake orchard, and discover enough space for family, staff, and guests.
    [Show full text]
  • Von Lossberg Regiment: a Chronicle of Hessian Participation in the American Revolution
    65-11,378 SLAGLE, Robert Oakley, 1925- THE VON LOSSBERG REGIMENT: A CHRONICLE OF HESSIAN PARTICIPATION IN THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION. The American University, Ph. D ., 1965 History, modern University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE VON LOSSBERG REGIMENT: A CHRONICLE OF HESSIAN PARTICIPATION IN THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION by Robert Oakley Slagle Submit ted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Signatures of Committee: Chairman: Graduate Dean: 72), fa* Date: '■? i/ . / ? 6 < r The American University AMERICAN UNIVERSITY Washington, D. C. LIBRARY MAY 2 1 1 9 6 5 WASHINGTON. D. C. # 3 / 6 (■> Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. PREFACE The historical treatment of German participation in the American Revolution has not been either as accurate or exten­ sive as the available facts and the significance of the sub­ ject would appear to warrant. Early American accounts typed the Hessians as plundering barbarians or as comic slaves to be pitied. British military historians usually touched only lightly on the German mercenaries, as if the authors were some­ what embarrassed by their existence. Many histories which are otherwise sound are so distorted on the subject of the Hessians as to be grossly inaccurate. Americans of the last century who attempted to revise the historical view of the Hessians, namely Lowell, Rosengarten,' and Greene, probably carried their revision too far toward glorifaction to be assessed as objective.
    [Show full text]
  • W3868 Isaac Reed
    Southern Campaigns American Revolution Pension Statements and Rosters Pension Application of Isaac Reed W3868 Rebecca Reed NJ Transcribed and annotated by C. Leon Harris. State of Virginia } SS county of Monongalia } On this 19th day of November, in the year 1832, personally appeared before the County court of Monongalia, Isaac Reed, a resident of said county, aged seventy four years, who being first duly sworn according to law, doth, on his oath make the following declaration in order to obtain the benefit of the act of Congress passed the 7th of June 1832. That he entered the service of the United States within three miles of Trenton in the state of New Jersey, in the year 1776 as a volunteer under Capt. John Mott, in a regiment of New Jersey militia commanded by Col. Joseph Philips, who resided in maidenhead township near Trenton – from near Trenton he marched in Capt. Motts company to Amboy – that whilst at Amboy we were guarding the inhabitants from the enemy who were on Staten Island – from Amboy we marched to Elizabeth town, where he remained untill the end of two months the term of his engagement when he was discharged by a general discharge. That in the fall of 1776 the whole of Capt. Motts company marched in the service of the United States, from Trenton across the Delaware into Pennsylvania, where we remained along the river untill the capture of the Hessians at Trenton in December of that year [26 Dec 1776] – that Capt Motts company was kept on guard, on the Pennsylvania side of the Deleware at the battle of Princeton [3 Jan 1777], after the battle of Princeton the enemy retreated to Brunswick, and Gen’l.
    [Show full text]
  • Trenton Campaign
    Dedicated to promoting the sites and venues of the Ten Crucial Days Robert Morris, delegate to the Continental Congress: I am Robert Morris, a wealthy Philadelphia merchant and Pennsylvania delegate to the Continental Congress. When the Congress abandoned Philadelphia on December 12, relocating to Baltimore, due to fear of an imminent British attack on the city, I sent away my family and many of my papers and valuables, but remained in Philadelphia at Washington’s request. I was to work on Congressional concerns until forced to leave by a British invasion. Congress was in dire straits due to a lack of money and we were unable to supply our army with sufficient food and clothing. Some delegates were wondering of Washington was a commander who carry on the war to a successful conclusion. In spite of this, we had voted to give him extensive powers in this time of crisis. We knew that Washington’s army would disband when its last enlistments expired on December 31, so we had authorized several months ago to recruit a new army to serve for a term of at least three years. However, getting me to enlist was a problem, due to Washington’s lack of success on the battlefield and our inability to fulfill our part of the contract with enlistees. Some of my colleagues were in fear that the war was almost over and unless Washington could reverse the tide and drive the British out of New Jersey, which they essentially controlled, the people would abandon the war effort and return to British authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents Relating to the Revolutionary History of the State of New Jersey
    Providence College DigitalCommons@Providence Primary Sources History & Classics 1901 Documents relating to the revolutionary history of the state of New Jersey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.providence.edu/primary Part of the United States History Commons "Documents relating to the revolutionary history of the state of New Jersey" (1901). Primary Sources. 3. https://digitalcommons.providence.edu/primary/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History & Classics at DigitalCommons@Providence. It has been accepted for inclusion in Primary Sources by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Providence. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This volume was prepared and edited by authority of the State of New Jersey, at the request of the New Jersey Historical Society, and under the direction of the follow- ing Committee of the Society: WILLIAM NELSON, GARRET D. W. VROOM, WILLIAM S. STRYKBB, AUSTIN SCOTT, EDMUND D. HALSEY, FRANCIS B. LEE, ERNEST C. RICHARDSON. ^ DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE REVOLUTIONARY HISTORY STATE OF NEW JERSEY. VOLUME I. EXTRACTS FROM AMERICAN NEWSPAPERS. VOL. I. 1776—1777. BDITBD BY WILLIAM S. STRYKER, A.M., LL.D., ADJUTANT-GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY. TBENTON, N. J.: THE JOHN L. MCKPHY PCBLISHING Co., FBINTERS. 1901. PREFACE. Without waiting for the completion of the First Series of the New Jersey Archives, it was concluded some years ago to begin the publication of a Second Series, to extend through the Revolutionary period, and to include extracts from American newspapers and several volumes of un- published manuscript material. The newspaper extracts were secured by diligent gleaning among the files in the principal libraries of the country, and with an impartial disregard of the sentiments of the papers.
    [Show full text]