DOCSLIB.ORG

Nobel Prize Winners in Physics from 1901 to 1990: Simple Statistics for Physics Teachers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nobel Prize Winners in Physics from 1901 to 1990: Simple Statistics for Physics Teachers University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Robert G. Fuller Publications and Presentations Research Papers in Physics and Astronomy May 1998 Nobel prize winners in physics from 1901 to 1990: Simple statistics for physics teachers Weijia Zhang Arizona State University Robert Fuller [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/physicsfuller Part of the Physics Commons Zhang, Weijia and Fuller, Robert, "Nobel prize winners in physics from 1901 to 1990: Simple statistics for physics teachers" (1998). Robert G. Fuller Publications and Presentations. 23. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/physicsfuller/23 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Research Papers in Physics and Astronomy at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Robert G. Fuller Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Physics Education, 33(3) (May 1998), pp. 196–203. Copyright © 1998 Institute of Physics/IOP Publishing. Used by permission. Nobel prize winners in physics from 1901 to 1990: Simple statistics for physics teachers Weijia Zhang Department of Physics and Astronomy, Arizona State University Robert G. Fuller Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nebraska–Lincoln Abstract: A demographic database for the 139 Nobel prize winners in physics from 1901 to 1990 has been created from a variety of sources. The results of our statistical study are dis- cussed in the light of the implications for physics teaching. The Nobel prize in physics, established in 1901 by es awarded to Nobel laureates [2]. The Nobel Alfred Nobel, aimed to reward “the person who laureates are among the most talented, successful shall have made the most important discovery or in- and fortunate scientists of thousands of researchers. vention in the domain of Physics” [1]. This centu- Besides public recognition for their contribution ry’s physics development is reflected by the priz- in the scientific domain, Nobel laureates can play 196 NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS IN PHYSICS FROM 1901 TO 1990 197 Figure 1. The nationality of laureates in different time periods from 1901 to 1990. very important roles in shaping science policy and Methods influencing science and technology education [3, 4]. Because of the history and influence of the No- We started our research by collecting data from bel prize, people are curious about the background, various sources [5–7] and setting up an electron- education and achievement of these laureates. For ic database. Our database includes the names of physics educators, the stories and anecdotes of No- the laureates, their award year(s), their nationali- bel laureates can add flavour to classroom lectures ties, countries where they were born and educat- and may stimulate students’ interest in learning the ed, marital status, religious preference, research principles and methods of physics. Although there field, etc. Data concerning field of research and reli- is abundant literature about Nobel laureates, demo- gion are more subjective and more difficult to judge graphic studies about Nobel prize winners in gener- than data concerning years and places. For laure- al and Nobel physics prize winners in particular are ates’ research fields we went through the Nobel lec- limited. In this paper, we systematically study the tures and made the best judgment about what major Nobel laureates in physics from 1901 to 1990. The work led to the award. We then compared the re- purpose of this study was threefold: firstly, to pro- search work presented in the lecture with the Phys- vide an overview of Nobel laureates in physics and ics and Astronomy Classification Scheme (PACS) present the data for educators to use in their teach- produced by the American Institute of Physics [8] ing; secondly, to provide some results that may be and assigned a code to it for further analysis. In significant enough for examination by those inter- the case of any uncertainty about how to classi- ested in the historical and social aspects of physics; fy a research work, we consulted with other phys- and thirdly, to present some implications related to icists and made a best judgment. The religious be- the current crisis in physics education. lief is an even harder determination. At this stage, 198 ZHANG & FULLER IN PHYSICS EDUCATION 33 (1998) Figure 2. Countries where laureates got their final degree. we used the data given in one source [5]. After set- erlands and France. Hence we can say that Europe ting up a database in a spreadsheet program, we an- was the centre of research and education in physics alysed the data and created some graphs to visual- before 1920. ize the results.* During the 1920s and 1930s, our data show that the centre of physics education and research began Results and analyses to shift from Europe to America. Many prizes went to physicists born and educated in the USA and those who immigrated to the USA. During this pe- Country of origin of laureates riod, 21% of the laureates were born and educated The nationalities of the prize winners and the coun- in the USA, and 42% had USA nationality. On the tries where the laureates received their final educa- other hand, 17% were German-born physicists but tion are shown in figures 1 and 2. only 8% had German nationality. Most laureates in Between 1901 and 1920, Europeans dominated this period were the elite that contributed dramat- physics research. All the laureates during this peri- ically to the developments of quantum mechanics od were born in Europe and all of them except A and atomic physics. A Michelson (the winner in 1907) were educated Award of the Nobel prize was halted from 1940 in Europe. Of the 23 laureates in this period, 32% to 1942 because of the Second World War (1939– were born and educated in Germany. Other coun- 1945). From 1943 to 1959, American physicists tries that produced the laureates were Britain, Neth- played the most important role in physics. Of 28 laureates in this period, 52% had American na- * The database is available as a Macintosh Excel file to those who are inter- tionality, including 30% USA-born physicists and ested in obtaining a copy. 22% immigrants. British physicists also had good NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS IN PHYSICS FROM 1901 TO 1990 199 performance during this period. Nineteen percent of laureates were British-born physicists and 15% had British nationality. For the first time, Russian physicists began to take the prize. The number of German-born laureates decreased to 15%, and the number of laureates that had German nationality decreased to only 4%. During the 1960s and 1970s, American phys- icists continued to dominate physics research. Of the 42 laureates* in this period, 57% had USA na- tionality. From 1981 to 1990, USA physicists re- ceived 60%, while German physicists got 16% of the physics prizes. Although there may be some political processes that affect the decision of the Nobel selection com- mittee [9, 10], the Nobel prizes probably reflect the strength of a nation’s science research in a particu- lar area and period. Therefore, we can see that ear- ly in this century Europe dominated physics educa- Figure 3. Distribution of award to laureates by age tion and research. During the 1920s and 1930s the group. United States began to catch up with Europe and surpass it in the latter half of this century. Einstein searchers’ publications span a large period of time [11] explained the success of scientific research in and there is also the factor of the lag between the the United States as follows: “I have warm admi- time of publication and the time when the work was ration for American institutes of scientific research. done. We leave this analysis for future investigation. We are unjust in attempting to ascribe the increas- ing superiority of American research work exclu- Religion and laureates sively to superior wealth; devotion, patience, a spir- There have been many times in history when dis- it of comradeship, and a talent for cooperation play coveries in physics conflicted with religion, espe- an important part in its success.” cially during the Middle Ages. The relation between science and religion has always been a sensitive and Ages and laureates somewhat subjective issue prone to discussion and It has been shown that, on average, physicists re- debate [13]. In this century, there have been some ceived the Nobel prize at an earlier age than re- great discoveries, like relativity, quantum mechan- searchers in other fields like chemistry or medicine, ics and the Big Bang theory, by Nobel laureates from 1901 to 1950 [12]. Our investigations show in physics which have affected humanity’s view that there is a wide distribution of awards to laure- about the nature and origin of the universe. There- ates of different ages (figure 3). fore, Nobel laureates in physics, as a group of peo- A physicist can never be too young (W L Bragg ple working at the frontier of physics, are a popula- got the prize at age 25) or too old (P L Kapitsa, age tion worth studying regarding the issue of religion 84) to get the highest prize in physics. It can be seen and science. from the figure that the great majority of the laure- Our statistics show that about 60% of the lau- ates got the prize between the ages of 35 and 65. reates had a Christian background. Twenty-four per The likelihood of winning a Nobel prize in phys- cent of the laureates had a Jewish background, and ics decreases sharply after a physicist reaches the 16% either had no affiliation or believed in other re- age of 65.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Nobel Prize in Physics: Four Historical Case Studies
    The Nobel Prize in Physics: Four Historical Case Studies By: Hannah Pell, Research Assistant November 2019 From left: Arnold Sommerfeld, Lise Meitner, Chien-Shiung Wu, Satyendra Nath Bose. Images courtesy of the AIP Emilio Segré Visual Archives. Grade Level(s): 11-12, College Subject(s): History, Physics In-Class Time: 50 - 60 minutes Prep Time: 15 – 20 minutes Materials • Photocopies of case studies (found in the Supplemental Materials) • Student internet access Objective Students will investigate four historical case studies of physicists who some physicists and historians have argued should have won a Nobel Prize in physics: Arnold Sommerfeld, Lise Meitner, Chien-Shiung Wu, and Satyendra Nath Bose. With each Case Study, students examine the historical context surrounding the prize that year (if applicable) as well as potential biases inherent in the structure of the Nobel Prize committee and its selection process. Students will summarize arguments for why these four physicists should have been awarded a Nobel Prize, as well as potential explanations for why they were not awarded the honor. Introduction Introduction to the Nobel Prize In 1895, Alfred Nobel—a Swedish chemist and engineer who invented dynamite—signed into his will that a large portion of his vast fortune should be used to create a series of annual prizes awarded to those who “confer the greatest benefit on mankind” in physics, chemistry, physiology or medicine, 1 literature, and peace.1 (The Nobel Prize in economics was added later to the collection of disciplines in 1968). Thus, the Nobel Foundation was founded as a private organization in 1900 and the first Nobel Prizes were awarded in 1901.
    [Show full text]
  • Muonium Gravity Seminar Wichita-6-17
    Antimatter Gravity MICE-U.S. Plans withDaniel Muons M. Kaplan US Spokesperson, MICE Collaboration Daniel M. Kaplan Physics Seminar WichitaMuTAC State Review Univ. June Fermilab16, 2017 16–17 March, 2006 Outline • Dramatis Personae • A Bit of History - antimatter, the baryon asymmetry of the universe, and all that... • The Ideas, The Issues, The Opportunities • Required R&D • Conclusions Our story’s a bit complicated, so please bear with me! ...and stop me if you have a question! D. M. Kaplan, IIT An#ma&er Gravity Seminar 2/41 Matter & Energy • After many decades of experimentation with subatomic particles, we now know whatDramatis everything is made of... Personae Baryons & antibaryons : p== uud & p uud ΛΛ==uds & uds ... Mesons : K00== ds & K ds B00== db & B db B+ == ub & B− ub ... ∓ ∓ ∓ Leptons : e , µ , τ , ν’s D. M. Kaplan, IIT An#ma&er Gravity Seminar 3/41 Matter & Energy • After many decades of experimentation with subatomic particles, we now know whatDramatis everything is made of... Personae “Imperfect mirror” Baryons & antibaryons : Antip== uud & p uud ΛΛ==uds & uds ... Mesons : Anti K00== ds & K ds B00== db & B db Anti B+ == ub & B− ub ... Antimatter Leptons : e∓, µ∓, τ∓, ν’s • And, don’t forget: antimatter and matter annihilate on contact D. M. Kaplan, IIT An#ma&er Gravity Seminar 3/41 Outline • Dramatis Personae ➡ • A Bit of History - antimatter, the baryon asymmetry of the universe, and all that... • The Ideas, The Issues, The Opportunities • Muonium Gravity Experiment • Required R&D • Conclusions D. M. Kaplan, IIT An#ma&er Gravity Seminar 4/41 Our story begins with..
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureates with Their Contribution in Biomedical Engineering
    NOBEL LAUREATES WITH THEIR CONTRIBUTION IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING Nobel Prizes and Biomedical Engineering In the year 1901 Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen received Nobel Prize in recognition of the extraordinary services he has rendered by the discovery of the remarkable rays subsequently named after him. Röntgen is considered the father of diagnostic radiology, the medical specialty which uses imaging to diagnose disease. He was the first scientist to observe and record X-rays, first finding them on November 8, 1895. Radiography was the first medical imaging technology. He had been fiddling with a set of cathode ray instruments and was surprised to find a flickering image cast by his instruments separated from them by some W. C. Röntgenn distance. He knew that the image he saw was not being cast by the cathode rays (now known as beams of electrons) as they could not penetrate air for any significant distance. After some considerable investigation, he named the new rays "X" to indicate they were unknown. In the year 1903 Niels Ryberg Finsen received Nobel Prize in recognition of his contribution to the treatment of diseases, especially lupus vulgaris, with concentrated light radiation, whereby he has opened a new avenue for medical science. In beautiful but simple experiments Finsen demonstrated that the most refractive rays (he suggested as the “chemical rays”) from the sun or from an electric arc may have a stimulating effect on the tissues. If the irradiation is too strong, however, it may give rise to tissue damage, but this may to some extent be prevented by pigmentation of the skin as in the negro or in those much exposed to Niels Ryberg Finsen the sun.
    [Show full text]
  • Sommerfeld: the Eternal Nobel Candidate Sommerfeld: the Eternal Nobel Candidate
    FollowFollow us soWe uswe wantso canVisit we youchat uscan onin onchat ourYoutube Twitter! onGoogle+ Facebook! circles :) Sharing knowledge for a Books Authors Collaborators English Sign in better future Science Technology Economy Environment Humanities About Us Home Sommerfeld: the Eternal Nobel Candidate Sommerfeld: the Eternal Nobel Candidate Share 24 July 2017 Physics, Science Augusto Beléndez Sign in or register to rate this publication Full Professor of Applied Physics at the University In late 1928, a famous German physicist wrote to one of his colleagues to tell him with of Alicante (Spain) since chagrin that he had once again been passed over for the Nobel Prize in Physics: 1996. [...] 7 “But to dispel all suspicion of false modesty, I must simultaneously note that it is gradually posts becoming a public scandal that I have still not received the Prize [Nobel Prize in Physics].” (1) The theoretical physicist Arnold Sommerfeld (1868-1951) was born in Königsberg, a city Related topics in what was formerly East Prussia, today Kaliningrad in Russia, and also the birthplace of the mathematicians Christian Goldbach and David Hilbert, the philosopher Immanuel Kant and Aeronautics Astrophysics the writer E. T. A. Hoffmann. After receiving his doctorate from the University of Königsberg Biology Biomedicine in 1891, he moved to the University of Göttingen, the mecca of mathematics in Germany at General Science Genetics that time, where he eventually became assistant to the mathematician Felix Klein and gave Mathematics Medicine classes on mathematics and theoretical physics. After spending some years at RWTH @en Physics Aachen University, in 1906 he succeeded Ludwig Boltzmann as professor of theoretical physics and director of the Institute of Theoretical Physics at the University of Munich, View all OpenMind topics where he set up a school of theoretical physics which gained worldwide renown.
    [Show full text]
  • Leon Ledermanrecalls How Gilberto Bernardini Helped Him to Rediscover
    REMINISCENCE Life in physics and the crucial sense of wonder Leon Lederman recalls how Gilberto Bernardini helped him to rediscover his enthusiasm for experimental physics, setting him on the road that would eventually lead to Stockholm and a Nobel prize in physics. As a grad student at Columbia around 1950, I had the rare oppor- tunity of meeting Albert Einstein. We were instructed to sit on a bench that would intersect Einstein’s path to lunch at his Princeton home. A fellow student and I sprang up when Einstein came by, accompanied by his assistant who asked if he would like to meet some students. “Yah,” the professor said and addressed my colleague, “Vot are you studying?” “I’m doing a thesis on quantum theory.” “Ach!” said Einstein, “A vaste of time!” He turned to me: “And vot are you doing?” I was more confident: “I’m studying experimentally the proper- ties of pions.” “Pions, pions! Ach, vee don’t understand de electron! Vy bother mit pions? Vell, good luck boys!” So, in less than 30 seconds, the Great Physicist had demol- ished two of the brightest – and best-looking – young physics Inspiration: Gilberto Bernardini, expressive and enthusiastic as ever. students. But we were on cloud nine. We had met the greatest scientist who ever lived! Some years before this memorable event, I had recently been discharged from the US army, having been drafted three years earlier to help General Eisenhower with a problem he had in Europe. It was called World War II. Our troop ship docked at the Battery and, having had a successful poker-driven ocean cross- ing, I taxied to Columbia University and registered as a physics grad student for the fall semester.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nobel Prize in Physics 2020
    PRESS RELEASE 6 October 2020 The Nobel Prize in Physics 2020 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the Nobel Prize in Physics 2020 with one half to and the other half jointly to Roger Penrose Reinhard Genzel Andrea Ghez University of Oxford, UK Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, USA Garching, Germany and University of California, Berkeley, USA “for the discovery that black hole “for the discovery of a supermassive compact object formation is a robust prediction of at the centre of our galaxy” the general theory of relativity” Black holes and the Milky Way’s darkest secret Three Laureates share this year’s Nobel Prize in dizzying speeds. Around four million solar masses are Physics for their discoveries about one of the most packed together in a region no larger than our solar system. exotic phenomena in the universe, the black hole. Using the world’s largest telescopes, Genzel and Ghez Roger Penrose showed that the general theory of developed methods to see through the huge clouds of inter- relativity leads to the formation of black holes. stellar gas and dust to the centre of the Milky Way. Stret- Reinhard Genzel and Andrea Ghez discovered that an ching the limits of technology, they refned new techniques invisible and extremely heavy object governs the orbits to compensate for distortions caused by the Earth’s of stars at the centre of our galaxy. A supermassive atmosphere, building unique instruments and committing black hole is the only currently known explanation. themselves to long-term research.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nobel Prize
    The Nobel Prize The Nobel Prize is the first international award given yearly since 1901 for achievements in physics, chemistry, physiology or medicine, literature and peace. Nobel Prize Facts 1901 – 2004 Total Science Prizes – 505 Physics: 172 Chemistry: 151 Physiology or Medicine: 182 Prizes are not awarded every year: 1940 – 1942: no prizes in any category were awarded Prize may be shared by up to three people Prize cannot be awarded posthumously Men:Women: 494:11 Mother-daughter winners: Curies (chemistry) Father-son: Siegbahn, Bohr, Bragg, Thomson (physics) Husband-wife: Curie (physics), Cori (physiology) Uncle-nephew: Chandrasakhar (physics) Brothers: Tinbergens (physiology, economics) Double winner/physics: Bardeen Double winner/chemistry: Sanger Double winner/different disciplines: Curie (physics, chemistry), Pauling (chemistry, peace) Country Physics Chemistry Medicine U.S. 66 47 90 Germany 27 26 18 Britain 21 23 20 France 11 7 9 USSR 6 1 2 Netherlands 6 2 3 Switzerland 4 5 -- Sweden 4 4 7 Austria 4 2 4 Canada 3 3 -- Denmark 3 1 6 Argentina -- 1 1 Belgium -- 1 2 Czechoslovakia -- 1 -- Italy 3 1 2 Japan 3 1 -- Finland -- 1 -- India 1 -- -- Mexico -- 1 -- Norway -- 1 -- Pakistan 1 -- -- South Africa -- 1 -- Australia -- -- 1 Hungary -- -- 1 Portugal -- -- 1 Spain -- -- 1 The Nobel Foundation The Nobel Foundation is a private institution established in 1900 based on the will of Alfred Nobel. The Foundation manages the assets made available through the will for the awarding of the Nobel Prize in Physics, Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine, Literature and Peace. It represents the Nobel institutions externally and administers informational activities and arrangements surrounding the presentation of the Nobel Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • Popular Science Background
    THE NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSICS 2016 POPULAR SCIENCE BACKGROUND Strange phenomena in matter’s fatlands This year’s Laureates opened the door on an unknown world where matter exists in strange states. The Nobel Prize in Physics 2016 is awarded with one half to David J. Thouless, University of Washington, Seattle, and the other half to F. Duncan M. Haldane, Princeton University, and J. Michael Kosterlitz, Brown Univer- sity, Providence. Their discoveries have brought about breakthroughs in the theoretical understanding of matter’s mysteries and created new perspectives on the development of innovative materials. David Thouless, Duncan Haldane, and Michael Kosterlitz have used advanced mathematical methods to explain strange phenomena in unusual phases (or states) of matter, such as superconductors, super- fuids or thin magnetic flms. Kosterlitz and Thouless have studied phenomena that arise in a fat world – on surfaces or inside extremely thin layers that can be considered two-dimensional, compared to the three dimensions (length, width and height) with which reality is usually described. Haldane has also studied matter that forms threads so thin they can be considered one-dimensional. The physics that takes place in the fatlands is very dif- ferent to that we recognise in the world around us. Even if very thinly distributed matter consists of millions of atoms, and even if each atom’s behaviour can be explai- Plasma ned using quantum physics, atoms display completely diferent properties when lots of them come together. New collective phenomena are being continually disco- vered in these fatlands, and condensed matter physics is now one of the most vibrant felds in physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Enrico Fermi Fermi Questions in Everyday Life
    Enrico Fermi Enrico Fermi (1901-1954) was an Italian physicist who made significant discoveries in nuclear physics and quantum mechanics. In 1938, he received the Nobel Prize in physics for his discovery of nuclear reactions caused by slow neutrons. This mechanism led directly to the development of atomic bombs and nuclear fission reactors. After receiving his Nobel Prize, he emigrated with his family to the United States to escape the fascist regime of Benito Mussolini, where he soon began contributing to the Manhattan Project. Fermi was famous for being able to make good estimates in situations where very little information was known. When the first nuclear bomb was tested, Fermi was nearby to observe. To get a preliminary estimate of the amount of energy released, he sprinkled small pieces of paper in the air and observed what happened when the shock wave reached them. (Being so close to the bomb on this and many other occasions exposed Fermi to dangerous radiation that led to his death by stomach cancer at the age of 53. Fermi was aware of the danger, but chose to work on this project anyway because he believed that the work was vital in the fight against Fascism.) Fermi often amused his friends and students by inventing and solving whimsical questions such as \How many piano tuners are there in Chicago?". A \Fermi Question" asks for a quick estimate of a quantity that seems difficult or impossible to determine precisely. Fermi's approach to such questions was to use common sense and rough estimates of quantities to piece together a ball-park value.
    [Show full text]
  • Glimpses of Greatness∗ a Personal View of P W Anderson (1923–2020)
    GENERAL ARTICLE Glimpses of Greatness∗ A Personal View of P W Anderson (1923–2020) G Baskaran P W Anderson was a theoretical physicist. He won the No- bel Prize in 1977. He catalysed Nobel Prizes for several oth- ers. His career spanned 72 years of relentless research, filled with path-breaking contributions. He focussed on ‘here and now’ phenomena of inanimate materials and built theoreti- cal quantum models of lasting value. He communed with na- ture by contemplation and study of experimental results. As a G Baskaran is a theoretical founding father, he set agenda for the field of condensed mat- physicist. He studies a variety ter physics, for half a century. It is a growing fertile field now, of quantum phenomena, with a web of connection to different corners of science, tech- including theory and nology, and sometimes beyond. As a person, Anderson was mechanism of room-temperature remarkable. He was my long time collaborator since 1984. I superconductivity. He shares had a wonderful opportunity to join hands with him when he his time between The Institute initiated the resonating valence bond (RVB) theory of high- of Mathematical Sciences, temperature superconductivity in cuprates in early 1987. Chennai, Department of Physics of Indian Institute of It was 1986. I was talking to Anderson in his office at Prince- Technology Madras and ton. A young undergraduate walked in. Students knew that no Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, prior appointment was necessary to meet this Nobel Laureate in Waterloo, Canada. his office. The student elaborated on an idea he had. After a while I became impatient.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Prize Case Study: Chien-Shiung Wu
    Nobel Prize Case Study: Chien-Shiung Wu Chien-Shiung Wu was a leading 20th-century Chinese-American nuclear experimental physicist who made extraordinary contributions to the field. She earned her undergraduate physics degree from National Central University in Nanjing and then her PhD in physics at the University of California, Berkeley. She then joined Columbia University in 1944 to work on enriching uranium ore for the Manhattan Project. After working on the Manhattan Project during the Second World War, she focused on experiments to measure beta decay, a form of radioactivity in which a proton turns into a neutron (and vice versa) by emitting a beta particle—an electron or positron. While observing the emission of cobalt-60, she observed that the particles had a Chien-Shiung Wu preferred direction of emission, which violated the principle of parity. This principle states that for any particle interaction, one cannot distinguish right from left or clockwise from counterclockwise.1 Wu was the first to prove this phenomenon experimentally, along with her collaborators, the Low Temperature Group of the US National Bureau of Standards. Wu’s experimental discovery in 1957 confirmed a theory by Chen Ning Yang and Tsung-Dao Lee, who were then awarded the Nobel Prize in physics later that year, even mentioning Wu in their acceptance speech. The Nobel Prize committee states that Yang and Lee were named laureates “for their penetrating investigation of the so-called parity laws which has led to important discoveries regarding the elementary particles.”2 Although she designed and undertook the experiment that confirmed the theory for which the Nobel was awarded, Wu was not included in the prize.
    [Show full text]
  • With Toshihide Maskawa Interviewer: Shigeki Sugimoto
    IPMU Interview with Toshihide Maskawa Interviewer: Shigeki Sugimoto 1 My rst paper was a Ph.D. Professor Sakata’s group. thesis There I was often teased about Sugimoto How are you? First behaving as if I were some I’d like to ask kind of big shot, even though your graduate I hadn’t written any papers. student days. (Laughs). Actually, my rst Maskawa Well, paper was my doctoral thesis. during those days at Once Yoichi Iwasaki2 came Nagoya University, to Nagoya with the intention graduate students who of observing us because he were theoretically oriented thought people from the were not assigned to any Nagoya group were standing particular group. Instead, they out and attracting his interest went around different theory in places like summer school. groups during the rst year Unfortunately, we were very or so. By the time they were busy at that time preparing about ready to write their for things like the Beijing master’s theses, they were Symposium, a student version assigned to the groups of of the Japan-China Academic their choice. Anyway, I joined Exchange Program, and for summer school. So, poor Toshihide Maskawa was awarded Iwasaki had to go back after the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physics having hardly any discussion jointly with Makoto Kobayashi for “the discovery of the origin of the with us. Subsequently, broken symmetry which predicts the 3 existence of at least three families Professor Shoichiro Otsuki of quarks in nature,” or, for the gave us a good scolding. “Kobayashi-Maskawa theory” of CP violation. He has also received He said that he was really many other distinguished awards, in particular the 1985 Japan Academy ashamed of us, as we had Prize and the 2008 Order of Cultural missed the opportunity to talk Merit.
    [Show full text]