Joint Transportation Board
Mrs A D Allen MBE (KCC) – Chairman Councillor K M Kelly (DBC)–Vice-Chairman
Mr D Butler (KCC) Mrs P Cole (KCC) Mr P Harman (KCC) Mr J Kite MBE(KCC) Mr J Ozog (KCC)
Councillor J A Hayes (DBC) Councillor E J Lampkin (DBC) Councillor Mrs J A Ozog (DBC) Councillor D Page (DBC) Councillor R J Wells (DBC)
Parish representative – Councillor R Lees
A meeting of the above Board will be held on
Tuesday 5 March 2019
at 7.00pm at the Civic Centre, Dartford
Managing Director 25 February 2019
Civic Centre, Home Gardens, Dartford, Kent, DA1 1DR Tel: 01322 343434 Fax: 01322 343422 Web:www.dartford.gov.uk
This page is intentionally left blank JOINT TRANSPORTATION BOARD AGENDA
Tuesday 5 March 2019
1. Apologies for Absence.
2. Declarations of Interest
To receive declarations of interest from Members including the terms(s) of the Grant of Dispensation (if any).
3. To confirm the Minutes of the meeting of the Dartford Joint (Pages 1 - 8) Transportation Board held on 4 December 2018
4. Urgent Items
The Chairman will announce his decision as to whether there are any urgent items and their position on the agenda.
5. Matters Arising (Pages 9 - 12) KCC This report advises Members on the progress of matters raised at previous meetings of the Board.
6. References from other Committees (if any)
7. Proposed Amendment of Waiting Restrictions Princes Road (Pages 13 - Dartford 22)
8. Traffic Issues within Swanscombe and Greenhithe
Mr Harman has asked if the following could be placed on the Agenda for consideration for traffic management schemes.
(a) Eynsford Road/Knockhall Road - corner protection required. (b) London Road/Knockhall Road - corner protection required. (c) Port Avenue/Mounts Road - corner protection required. (d) Stoneley Crescent/Ingress Park Avenue - stop sign required. (e) Ingress Park development - extension of 20 mph zone required. (f) Ingress Park Avenue - repeater 20 mph speed signage required.
The Board’s instructions are requested. 9. Members Enquiry Items
Members have the opportunity to raise the following: -
Questions in relation to capital and revenue funded works programmes Suggestions for future traffic regulation orders or street management proposals Questions on policies, plans and strategies related to highways, road traffic and public transport. Suggestion of a future agenda item (subject to the Chairman’s approval)
ITEMS FOR INFORMATION
10. Road Works in the Borough of Dartford (Pages 23 - 36)
Members will be advised of the roadworks which were currently being undertaken or expected within the Borough.
11. KCC - Environment, and Transport Cabinet Committee (Pages 37 - 50)
For Members information the following has been attached for Members information: -
. Environment, and Transport Cabinet Committee – Minutes 17 January 2019
NB: If a Member wishes to discuss any of these items at the meeting, please advise the Member Services Section (01322) 343251 prior to the meeting.
DARTFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL
JOINT TRANSPORTATION BOARD
MINUTES of the meeting of the Joint Transportation Board held on Tuesday 4 December 2018 at 7.00 pm
PRESENT: Mrs A Allen (Chairman) Councillor K M Kelly (Vice-Chairman) Mrs P Cole Mr J Ozog Mr P Harman
Councillor J A Hayes Councillor E J Lampkin Councillor Mrs J A Ozog Councillor T A Maddison Councillor R J Wells
Mr L Boudville, Mr K Longfield and Mrs T Smith (Dartford Borough Also Council), Ms E Green and Ms D Sutton (Kent Highways) Mr D Bruce Present and P Lightowler (KCC Public Transport) and Mr J Barkway and Mr C Vinson Southeastern Rail)
27. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE.
The Board received apologies for absence from Councillors Page and Lees, and Messrs Baker and Kite.
The Board noted the appointment of Councillor T Maddison as a substitute for Councillor Page
28. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
There were no interests declared by Board Members.
29. TO CONFIRM THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DARTFORD JOINT TRANSPORTATION BOARD HELD ON 4 SEPTEMBER 2018.
That the minutes of the Joint Transportation Board held on 4 September 2018 be confirmed as a correct record of that meeting.
30. URGENT ITEMS
The Chairman confirmed that there were no urgent issues for the Board to consider.
1 JOINT TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TUESDAY 4 DECEMBER 2018
31. REFERENCES FROM OTHER COMMITTEES (IF ANY)
It was noted that there were no matters referred for the Board to consider.
32. MATTERS ARISING
The Board received a report on progress made on a number of issues outstanding from previous meetings.
Arising from the report the feedback was received:
Item 10. Councillor Ozog reported that Yellow lines had now been installed in Maiden Lane and he hoped that this would alleviate the problems caused by inconsiderate parking.
Additionally it was noted that the Working Group on School Safety mentioned at our last meeting had now met, and the Chairman asked if the minutes of the Group be appended to the Board Agenda in future.
33. CHAIRMAN'S UPDATE
The Chairman had requested information on the following matters
a) Delays in the completion of road works at St Clements Way, Greenhithe:
It was reported that work on this scheme was on target but that traffic congestion had been worsened by the closure of Greenhithe Station approach road and the necessary traffic detours for this. It was also noted that work was progressing well but completion may be affected by re surfacing works in the vicinity.
b) Progress on the introduction of Residents Parking Schemes across the Borough.
The Chairman informed Members that while inquiries had been made relating to a number of Residents parking schemes, there were none for which approval had been given by Members.
34. PROPOSED WAITING RESTRICTIONS, CHASTILIAN ROAD AND WENTWORTH DRIVE , DARTFORD, KENT
Ms Emma Green Kent County Council Highways Engineer introduced a report on proposed parking restrictions to be introduced in Chastilian Road and Wentworth Drive Dartford.
2 JOINT TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TUESDAY 4 DECEMBER 2018
It was explained that Wentworth Primary School had recently undergone an expansion and that one of the impacts of this has been an increase in vehicle traffic at this location.
In response to that and to reduce the danger to persons and vehicles using this road Kent County Council had proposed introducing waiting restrictions in Chastilian Road and Wentworth Drive, and conducted public consultation thereon.
Following numerous objections by local residents to initial proposals which included the introduction of double yellow lines in these roads, a second amended proposal was published which attracted a much reduced level of opposition.
Having considered the proposal and having noted the support of the local Councillor for the area the Board,
RESOLVED to
Recommend the approval of the Traffic Regulation Order, detailed in the report of Officers, to install both double yellow lines and waiting restriction in Chastilian Avenue and Wentworth Drive Dartford in order to:
i. Improve safety for pedestrians, including school children, and vehicles using this road.
ii. Reduce the safety problems associated with the current inconsiderate parking, exacerbated by the expansion of the primary school.
iii. Improve visibility at junctions by reducing the extent of parked cars that are causing obstructions.
35. FASTRACK REPORT
The Board received a report from Mr Daniel Bruce on developments which had taken place on Fastrack since the June 2018 meeting.
Mr Bruce highlighted the following points
Fastrack Busway Enforcement A trial of a system of camera enforcement is to be held on the Ingress Park / Greenhithe Station busway in December - January 2018/2019.
The trial will be testing technical and viability aspects of an installation and will survey levels of non – compliance. No actual enforcement will take place. A report on the outcome should be available for the March meeting of the Board.
3 JOINT TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TUESDAY 4 DECEMBER 2018
While there were no current plans to extend the trial to other busways it was accepted that the Darenth Road busway was much abused and may also merit camera enforcement if it proves viable.
Ingress Park: Tiltman Avenue to Manor Way Link Fastrack service B has commenced using the link following confirmation that ongoing works would not compromise the route.
A new time table has been introduced and new stops have been provided, (with shelters to follow in some locations), although some issues are being experienced with inconsiderate parking on the route. It is understood that Crest Nicholson are planning an extension to the current TRO to overcome this.
Ingress Abbey Bus Stop It has been necessary to undertake a consultation exercise relating to the siting of this stop as adjacent properties are populated. Of the 20 responses received only one objection has been received. As the location of the Stop would have been known as part of the planning process, and there was not a viable alternative it had been agreed to retain the position as proposed.
Operating Contract for Fastrack B The current operating contract expires in April 2019 and a short term extension of 4 months will be in place with the current provider while the tendering exercise for the contract is completed.
Representation at the Board Mr Bruce also reported that a new Officer had been appointed by KCC to deal with Fastrack – Mr Shane Hymers- – and that he would be presenting this report at future meetings.
36. VEHICLE CROSSOVERS
The Board was reminded that at its meeting held on 4 September 2018 Members had requested that a report be prepared on the cost and provision of necessary amendments to Traffic Regulation Orders TRO following the approval of the installation of vehicle crossovers by Kent County Council (KCC).
It was noted that currently KCC, as Highway Authority, consider applications for vehicle footway crossings, but that responsibility for amendments to any TRO and physical signage that may apply, lies with District Authorities.
This obviously places a financial burden on District Authorities when applications be approved
Accordingly the Principal Transport Planner, introduced a report which set out details of proposed costings for a range of amendments to TRO together with removal or amendment of “on road” markings linked to the amendments. 4 JOINT TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TUESDAY 4 DECEMBER 2018
It was noted that while the proposed charges for the work were relatively high, their publication would at least present transparency to the process and allow residents a full picture of the cost of their footway crossing.
The Board therefore
RESOLVED
1. To note the implications of Kent County Council’s policy and its impact on Dartford Borough Council resources
2. To RECOMMEND to the Cabinet that the scheme as set out in paragraph 3.6 of the Report be further developed and implemented.
37. DARTFORD TOWN CENTRE: TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC REALM IMPROVEMENTS
The Board received a report which set out the transport and public realm improvements proposed as part of the redevelopment of Dartford town centre.
It was noted that the report detailed progress achieved since April 2018 and set out the finalised outline design for Market Street summarised activities completed and set out the planned schedule of work through to the completion of the scheme.
Members were generally pleased at the proposals and the progress achieved and reported that a number of local businesses had similar views. However concerns were expressed at the following matters
The re - routing of local “Hoppa” bus routes away from the Town Centre. This could be problematic as this service is used by large numbers of elderly shoppers coming into the Town Centre and re - routing would impact upon them.
The levels of parking provision once the works were complete
Proposed speed limits in Market Street and its use as a shared pedestrian / vehicle area
Measures to maintain the current and new pedestrianised area as vehicle free, as access is to be allowed for deliveries to shops in the area.
In response to these issues the following points were made:
5 JOINT TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TUESDAY 4 DECEMBER 2018
While some bus services were being re - routed to Home Gardens the “Hoppa” routes were to retain their current route and thus have little impact on the elderly.
Once the improvement scheme is complete there will be more parking spaces available for shoppers and Town Centre users.
Market Street is to remain a highway and not be a shared pedestrian / vehicle space. It will be significantly narrower than before and this should deter vehicles from travelling at inappropriate speeds in the area.
It is recognised that unauthorised use of the pedestrianised areas of Market Street and High Street is currently a problem. It is proposed to allow access for deliveries to shops but to exclude other traffic by use of electric bollards and other physical methods.
Having considered the report and the responses to the points raised the Board agreed to note the information provided.
38. PETITION: REZONING DARTFORD RAILWAY STATION
The Board was informed that a petition had been submitted to the Council seeking the re - location of Dartford Railway Station, which is currently in Travel Card Zone 8, to Zone 7. The petition cited the differing fare levels between local neighbouring stations and that there was currently not a Zone 7 in the area.
It was noted that rail operators accepted that there were major inconsistencies in the arrangement of the zoning for travel cards across London and that Dartford had been placed in Zone 8 when the Travelcard system was extended some three years ago. At that time the zoning produced a reduced fare for Travelcard users.
Mr Vinson of Southeastern Rail informed the Board that currently there was an ongoing review of fares and stations led by the Managing director of Southeastern Rail and he would pass this request to the review team for consideration.
The Board therefore agreed to
1. Note the petition and await the outcome of the Review process.
2. Inform the head petitioner accordingly
39. SOUTHEASTERN RAIL: VERBAL UPDATE
The Board received a verbal update on points relating to rail services from Mr Chris Vinson – Public Relations Manager Southeastern Rail, and Mr John Barkway – Commercial Manager, Southeastern Rail. 6 JOINT TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TUESDAY 4 DECEMBER 2018
Mr Vinson informed the Board that a bid had been submitted to the Department of Transport for the upgrading of Swanscombe Station. This had been identified as being of high priority following recent consultations with Dartford Council.
In response to a request by Councillor Mrs Ozog, Messrs Vinson and Barkway explained why there were no services from London Cannon Street to Dartford after 17.19 each evening.
It was explained that in an effort to increase the capacity of train services into London a revised programme of trains had been introduced. However in order to accommodate this on the current aging rail network, it was necessary to reduce services from Cannon Street to Dartford.
40. MEMBERS ENQUIRY ITEMS
Members raised the following issues:
Mr P Harman Mr Harman reported that he had a number of matters relating to Traffic Regulation Orders in Greenhithe and Swanscombe that he wished to be discussed by the Board. He asked how this could be progressed.
The Chairman informed Mr Harman that he should write to the Clerk to the Board and the Chairman and a decision would be taken on whether these should be added to the Agenda.
Mr J Ozog Mr Ozog enquired about the cost of renovation of “Dog Bone” markings. A resident in Blenheim Close had received a very high quotation for works outside their property and Mr Ozog queried this.
While there seemed to be some question regarding the ownership of the Road surface the Principal Transport Planner explained that the quotation provided seemed to relate to the frontage of two adjoining properties, and if this was not required then a lesser cost would be incurred.
Additionally Mr Ozog drew the Board’s attention to the constant misuse of a disabled parking bay in Nelson and Wellington Road by a commercial vehicle.
Principal Transport Planner stressed that enforcement might not be an option if this were a discretionary bay but that if it were constantly misused then removal may be an option.
Mr Maddison Mr Maddison asked if problems relating to congestion in Central Road Dartford could be investigated. He was aware that works in the road were now complete but congestion problems persisted.
7 JOINT TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TUESDAY 4 DECEMBER 2018
Ms Sutton agreed to investigate the matter but stressed that if problems were due to incomplete / unsatisfactory Statutory Undertakers works then this would need to be logged onto the Kent Traffic fault system.
41. DARTFORD WINTER WORKS
The Board received and noted a report on the winter works programme adopted by Kent County Council.
42. WELL MANAGED HIGHWAYS
The Board received a report which detailed the Strategy which is to be adopted by Kent County Council for the implementation of a new code of practice for highway maintenance management.
The Board noted the information contained in the report.
43. DARTFORD HIGHWAYS WORKS PROGRAMME
The Board received and noted a report from KCC Highways which informed Members regarding the roadworks currently being undertaken or proposed in the Borough.
44. KCC - ENVIRONMENT AND TRANSPORT CABINET COMMITTEE
The Board received and noted the Minutes of the Kent County Council Environment and Transport Cabinet Committee held on 20 September 2018.
The meeting closed at 9.13 am
Mrs A Allen MBE CHAIRMAN
8 JOINT TRANSPORTATION BOARD 5 March 2019
MATTERS ARISING
1. Summary
1.1 This report advises Members on the progress of matters arising at previous meetings of the Board.
2. RECOMMENDATION
2.1 That Members note the comments in the “Update/Outcome” column of the Appendix A to this report
3 Background and Discussion
3.1 Previously, the Joint Transportation Board requested that a report on matters arising be placed on future agendas of this Board.
3.2 The matters arising are as detailed in the Appendix A to this report.
3.3 A verbal update, where applicable, will be given at the meeting of this Board.
4 Details of Exempt Information Category
Not applicable
5. Appendices
Appendix A: Matters Arising
BACKGROUND PAPERS:
None
Contact Officers : As detailed in the Appendix to this report
KCC Highways & Transportation 08458 247 800 Contact Number: Dartford Borough Council 01322 343251
Dartford Joint Transportation Board
5 March 2019
Action Current Situation Update / Outcome 1 Fast Track – Future Developments A twice yearly update to be made to the KCC Officers may wish to update Members Board. verbally at the meeting.
2. Sensible Street Lighting Dartford LED conversions are substantially Once further information is available KCC will complete. invite Members to a briefing session and will be updating the programme on the KCC website.
14.3. Bob Dunn Way. a) Access Issues It is understood that contractor difficulties The latest plan is that construction should be are delaying works, KCC Officers agreed to starting in April. expedite matters
b) Flood alleviation KCC have decided to commission their own A Pump is located on site and this will remain survey to allow the drainage works to until the works are complete. commence.
15.4. Removal of Redundant Lamp Members have agreed to monitor the Members have been invited to pass details of columns and Stumps progress made in removal. redundant columns to KCC for removal
16.5. Parking Issues Ingress Park This matter was considered at the June Mr Harman has asked that this matter be 2017 meeting and representations received placed on the Agenda for Member discussion. from the Developer and the Parking contractor. 17.6. Misuse of Busways by Motorists The possible deployment of a mobile CCTV A pilot is to be introduced at Ingress Park and camera to aid in deterring and prosecuting results will be reported to Members once motorists who misuse the busways was to available. be investigated by KCC and that a report be presented. 18.7 Parking Control Issues: Common A number of measures have now been Members have asked that this area be Lane Wilmington introduced and further work is ongoing. monitored Dartford Joint Transportation Board
5 March 2019
Action Current Situation Update / Outcome 19.8 Traffic Congestion arising from the This issue was referred to Cabinet for A report was presented on 5 June which Dartford Crossing Consideration. updated Members on planned mitigations.
20.9 Pedestrian Safety Fastrack Routes The Chairman had undertaken to contact the Fastrack operators on this matter.
21.10 Maiden Lane Dartford This issue has been raised on a number of TRO have been introduced and it is hoped 22. Traffic / Parking Issues occasions by Members at Board meetings that these will alleviate problems with inconsiderate parking. 23.11 Leigh Technical College area, The Board agreed to monitor the area with a The Transport Services Manager has been Parking Issues view to traffic regulation if problems do not asked to provide an update on this matter to improve. the Board Members between meetings
24.12 Feedback on various traffic Heath Lane, Dartford. At the meeting held regulation issues on 5 June concern was raised over proposed KCC works and the Board resolved to form a working group to assess issues further.
25.13 Access Gate between Fastrack and This gate has now been fixed closed with a Proposals for the Acacia Hall site will impinge Darenth Road padlock and chain. on this and the Board asked that the matter be kept under review. 26.14 Increased Pavement Provision for The Board considered a request for better The Board was advised that a costed A225 Dartford Road at Sutton at footway provision. proposal from the relevant KCC Member Hone and Hawley would be considered favourably by KCC. 27.15 Dropped Kerbs / Amendments to The Board asked for a report on this to be This matter was discussed at the December TRO presented as soon as possible meeting and a report is to be put to Cabinet on proposals. PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF RESTRICTIONS, PRINCES ROAD, DARTFORD
To: Dartford Joint Transportation Board – 5TH March 2019
By: Tim Read, Head of Transportation, Kent County Council
Classification: Unrestricted
Ward: Heath Ward, Dartford District
Summary: This report gives details of proposed waiting restrictions in Princes Road, Dartford and the effect is to offer exemptions for the Business Properties 701 – 709 Princes Road in allowing the exhibition of motor vehicles.
For Recommendation
1.0 Introduction and Background
1.1 Kent County Council is proposing an improvement scheme to install a shared use pedestrian/cycle route on the northern side of Princes Road between the roundabout Junction with the A282 and its junction with Watling Street.
1.2 The scheme is to provide a safe route for both Pedestrians and Cyclists as a link and improvement to the NCR1 and encourage further sustainable travel modes. Kent County Council has proposed to clarify the waiting restrictions allowing for an exemption within this order for the businesses as stated above.
2.0 The Proposal
2.1 2.1 There have been two consultations relating to the scheme proposal. This highlighted the need to clarify waiting restrictions.
2.2 The consultation proposed the extension of double yellow lines, which included an exemption to allow the exhibition of motor vehicles as specified on the attached plan (appendix A), access to the commercial properties and loading and unloading of vehicles only.
2.3 The proposal is for the north side of Princes Road, Dartford, from a point 72 metres west of its junction with Watling Street and from a point 4.5 metres north of the carriageway kerb line, northwards, to the highway boundary for a distance of 42.5 metres, westwards.
2.4 The new proposals have been recommended to improve road user safety by preventing vehicle obstruction related to the new Pedestrian/Cycle scheme.
2.5 It is stated in the exemption that KCC have conceded in allowing one car length of vehicle exhibition on Highway Land directly in front of the Business Premises (see Appendix A). The space agreed will not impede on the new pedestrian/cycle scheme. However, any motor vehicles waiting outside the agreed exception area will have a detrimental effect on the road user safety. 2.6 These proposals received three objections for the business owners who access their premises via Princes Road.
3.0 Consultation
3.1 The proposals were placed on deposit at Dartford Borough Council and Public Notices were put on display at the site location. The deadline for responses was 10th December 2018. A copy of the Consultation Document can be seen in Appendix B.
3.2 A total of 4 responses were received, 2 were from the same business. No response has been received from Kent Police. None of the responses received were in total support of the proposals. A summary of the comments is made below.
Respondent Support/Object Comments Kent Police No response received 3 x Businesses (all Object Concerned it would have an with similar impact on business due to comments) removal of customer parking directly in front of the businesses. Due to the size of the business premises there is limited capacity for vehicle display, movement of vehicles and customer parking within the site. The area proposed for the scheme has been used by businesses and customers since the 1940’s and up until this point has been tolerated by KCC. The introduction of yellow lines is in an attempt to limit the increased potential for accidents arising from the introduction of the cycle route. The impact on how the business can function may result in a closure and loss of jobs.
3.3 The main concerns appear to be that the businesses will not be able utilise the area of Highways owned land directly in front of the business entrances for customer parking and also manoeuvring of vehicles stored within these premises.
4.1 Financial and VAT
4.1.1 None for Dartford Borough Council.
4.2 Legal 4.2.1 None for Dartford Borough Council.
4.3 Corporate
4.3.1 None for Dartford Borough Council. 5.0 Recommendation(s)
5.1 Agree to overturn the objections and progress the Traffic Regulation Order to install double yellow lines and waiting restriction with the proposed exemption for parking in the area shown in Appendix A. The introduction of this Order is recommended on the grounds of safety for pedestrians and cyclists using the proposed shared pedestrian/cycle path.
Contact Officer: Robert Fletcher, TRO Co-ordinator, Schemes Planning & Delivery Team Reporting to: Tim Read, Head of Transportation, Kent County Council, 03000 418181
Background Papers
Title Details of where to access copy Whole file Highway Services, Kent County Council
1018.1 KEY: as defined on this drawing. Refer to the contract for full terms and conditions. This drawing is not to be used in whole or part other than for the intended purpose and project Rev 0 N KCC Highway Boundary Continuous double yellow line 100mm wide spaced apart with a perpendicular 450mm Agreed business parking area Revision Date 14/08/2018 Garage Consultation
1018.1 Purpose of revision 701 - 707
NO PARKING
42.5m
1018.1 Drawn amf Checked 709
Approved
PARKING
NO Project 4.5m Drawing title Double Yellow Carriageway Markings end mark.
1018.1 Princes Road Proposed Dartford
PRINCES ROAD
72m Drawing number Drawing status Scale Princes Road / TRO © Crown Copyright and database right 2018. NTS at A4 Ordnance Survey 100019238. Consultation Henwood Industrial Estate Kent County Council Ashford Highway Depot Ashford TN24 8AD Tel: 03000 418181 Do not scale Rev 0
Princes Road, Dartford Cycle Route Consultation Report
Introduction
This report details the responses to the consultation on the proposal to provide a cycle route along Princes Road (A296) in Dartford. The public consultation was open between 30 April and 10 June 2018.
Kent County Council (KCC) is keen to encourage active travel by making it an attractive and realistic choice for short journeys in Kent. By developing and promoting Kent’s cycling and walking infrastructure in the county, KCC aims to reduce congestion, improve air quality, increase levels of physical activity and improve the health of its residents.
KCC’s Active Travel Strategy supports Dartford Borough Council’s (DBC) Core Strategy which: aims to implement an integrated walking and cycling network joining communities with the facilities they need to access, including public transport facilities, primarily through the Green Grid and including the Public Rights of Way network.
Dartford has the potential, through large scale mixed use development, to significantly increase the levels of cycling and walking among its residents thereby reducing reliance on motorised modes for local travel. However, the cycling and walking network must be enhanced and expanded if there is to be a significant increase in the number choosing to travel using sustainable modes.
Through the Local Growth Fund, KCC has been awarded funding to deliver substantial enhancements to pedestrian, cycle and public transport facilities and infrastructure to make these modes more attractive when compared to the private car.
The purpose of this consultation was to invite comments on a proposal to construct a new a shared use pedestrian and cycle path along the section of Princes Road (A296) to the East of M25 Junction 1b. The length of the path will be approximately 900m.
The scheme proposed a shared use path to be constructed through widening the existing northern footway between the Princes Road Interchange Roundabout and the Peanut Roundabout. This has been identified as a suitable route because, the new path will provide a more direct route for cyclists travelling in the area than the existing cycle route (that forms part of National Cycle Route 1) which currently takes a path around the housing estate to the south of Princes Road. At its eastern end the new path will join up with an existing high quality shared use path linking to Bluewater and Ebbsfleet Garden City.
The proposed cycle route design would meet all national minimum design standards, including: • Widening of the existing footpaths to a minimum of 2.5m. • The installation of shared pedestrian footway/cycleway signage where necessary throughout the length of the route. • Removal of build out located outside of ‘Vauxhall Dartford’ to facilitate the delivery of vehicles to the commercial sites and to allow the shared use path to remain in a straight line. • The relocation of existing sign posts and street furniture to ensure pedestrian and cyclist movement is relatively unobstructed.
An initial design stage safety audit was completed and available from the consultation directory. Another audit will be carried out at the construction stage.
Consultation Process
The consultation for the proposed cycle route ran from 30 April to 10 June 2018. The consultation and supporting documents were hosted on the KCC Consultation Directory.
The consultation leaflet was downloaded 67 times in PDF format and 17 times in Word. The road safety audit was downloaded 29 and each section of the design plan was downloaded 38, 31 and 37 times respectively. In addition, the Equalities Impact Assessment was downloaded 27 times in PDF and 9 times in Word. Consultees were able to provide feedback to the scheme via email or post.
A consultation poster was circulated directly to 200 homes and businesses in the roads adjacent to the proposed cycle route. Posters were displayed on the route of the proposed location and in Dartford Library. An extensive list of stakeholders, including Darenth Valley Hospital, local schools and Dartford and Gravesend Cycling Forum were also contacted directly to alert them to the consultation. A press release advertising the consultation was published, and local elected County and District Members were contacted individually.
All publicity material included a phone number and email address for people to request hard copies and alternative formats of the consultation material.
Respondents
Seven responses were received, via email direct to the designated mailbox. No information in relation to the demographics of the respondents was requested, however, six of these responses were from local residents or businesses along the proposed cycle route. Therefore, the majority of respondents would be directly impacted by the proposed route, the other response was from Dartford and Gravesham Cycling Forum. There were no responses from the ward councillors.
Consultation Reponses
Of the seven responses, six (86%) had an overall positive view on the proposed scheme. However, further comments from the six responses were provided about the detail of the scheme and where improvements could be made.
The positive comments recognised that the scheme would have an impact on improving the local cycle infrastructure and proving greater choice of route.
There were nine themes identified in the comments received:
Theme Positive Negative Comments Comments Received Received/ Suggested Improvements Improvement to existing cycle infrastructure 6 More Direct Route for NCR1 2 Shared Use Path/Segregated Path 4 2.5m Width Insufficient 2 Dangerous Crossing Point – Watling Street 2 Parking 4 Position of Bus Shelter Relocation 2 Small Section – Insufficient for Mode Shift 2 Bus Lane Unnecessary 1
The main concerns from respondents are: 1. A shared use path for both cyclists and pedestrians can be unsafe due to the differing speeds and direction of travel. Segregated paths are more beneficial as they provide a separate space for each travel mode and often allow for a cyclist to feel safer in their movements. 2. Current parking behaviour could render the scheme unusable. Parking in the area is limited and some businesses do not have onsite parking. 3. 2.5m width for the shared use pathway is not sufficient. Current recommended guidelines state a width of 3m is required where there is no segregation between pedestrians and cyclists. 4. The current courtesy crossing point at Watling Street is dangerous. A signalised crossing on the proposed re-alignment of NCR1 is required as part of this scheme to ensure the safety of all users.
Equality Analysis
Within the comments received, the conflict between cyclists and pedestrians sharing a pathway was raised as a concern. It was felt that this could potentially impact vulnerable groups such as the elderly, disabled, young children and parents/carers more than the wider population. Unfortunately, whilst a segregated pathway would be preferred, due to the lack of space available this is not a feasible option. It is common practice for shared use pathways to be provided where space is restricted and in general these are well received with cyclists restricting the requirements of other users. Signage along the length of the route will alert both pedestrians and cyclists to the dual use of the pathway. In addition, following feedback from the consultation there are also proposals for additional signage alerting road and cycle path users to the vehicle movements around the businesses.
Post Consultation
Following the consultation, the main concern raised was in relation to parking, in particular around some of the businesses that trade along Princes Road. To address this specific issue a meeting has been held with the business owners in order to discuss the concerns raised in more detail and allow KCC to work to resolve or reduce any of the issues identified. Following this meeting KCC will formalise any agreement reached with the business owners. As there is a need to control parking in this area, a new Traffic Regulation Order will be required with a further consultation period before this is implemented.
Whilst KCC appreciates the comments received, in particular in relation to segregated space and the width of the shared use path, the space available for the scheme to be constructed within limits the ability to address some of these concerns. However, where possible, design adjustments will be considered to try to accommodate these elements.
Next Steps
Feedback from the consultation, along with the additional information above, has been considered by officers at KCC and DBC, and has been used to inform the finalisation of the proposal.
Taking into account the benefit of the scheme to enhance the strategic cycling and walking network in Dartford in accordance with KCC and DBC policy objectives, together with consultation feedback, KCC officers have concluded to proceed with the scheme and implementation is now being planned.
The scheme and results of the consultation will also be submitted to the Dartford Joint Transportation Board for information on 4 September 2018.
Following this, we are planning to build the scheme in Spring 2019. In order for the scheme to be built, lane closures will be required but it is intended that two way traffic flow will be maintained and it is therefore unlikely any full road closures will be required. Advance Notice Boards will be put up two weeks prior to construction and local residents will receive a start of works notice that will include the full traffic management plan. In addition, if necessary Variable Message Signs may be used to ensure information can be updated during the construction period. We will continue to liaise with all local businesses to ensure that construction minimises any disruption to their activities. We will endeavour to ensure that any inconvenience during the build is kept to a minimum.
To: Dartford Joint Transportation Board
By: KCC Highways, Transportation and Waste
Date: 5th March 2019
Subject: Highway Works Programme 2018/19
Classification: Information Only
Summary: This report updates Members on the identified schemes approved for construction in 2018/19
1. Introduction
This report provides an update and summarises schemes that have been programmed for delivery in 2018/19
Footway and Carriageway Improvement Schemes – see Appendix A
Drainage Repairs & Improvements – see Appendix B
Street Lighting – see Appendix C
Transportation and Safety Schemes – see Appendix D Local Growth Fund
Developer Funded Works – see Appendix E
Bridge Works – see Appendix F
Traffic Systems – see Appendix G
Combined Member Fund – see Appendix H
Conclusion
1. This report is for Members information. Contact Officers:
The following contact officers can be contacted on 03000 418181
Carol Valentine Highway Manager West Kent Denise Sutton Dartford District Manager Alan Casson Senior Asset Manager Earl Bourner Drainage & Structures Asset Manager Sue Kinsella Street Light Asset Manager Toby Butler Traffic & Network Solutions Asset Manager Jamie Hare Development Agreements Manager Jamie Watson Schemes Programme Manager Appendix A – Footway and Carriageway Improvement Schemes
The delivery of these schemes is weather dependent; should it prove not possible to carry out these works on the planned dates, new dates will be arranged and the residents will be informed by a letter drop to their homes.
Machine Resurfacing – Contact Officer Mr Byron Lovell
Road Name Parish Extent of Works Current Status
St Clements Road to London Road Greenhithe To be programmed Knockhall Road
Littlebrook Interchange to Completed A206 Crossways Anchor Boulevard Dartford Boulevard Roundabout (including roundabout)
Footway Improvement - Contact Officer Mr Neil Tree
Road Name Parish Extent and Description of Current Status Works
From its junction with New Barn Road to its junction Longfield Avenue Longfield with Nurstead Avenue. Completed (Footway protection treatment)
Surface Treatments – Contact Officer Mr Clive Lambourne
No works currently planned
Appendix B – Drainage
Drainage Works – Contact Officer Earl Bourner
Road Name Parish Description of Works Current Status
No Drainage works planned over £5000 Appendix C – Street Lighting
Structural testing of KCC owned street lights has identified the following as requiring replacement. A status of complete identifies that the column replacement has been carried out. Programme dates are identified for those still requiring replacement.
Street Lighting Column Replacement – Contact Officer Sue Kinsella
Road Name Parish Description of Works Status
On hold due to asset Junction 1A Dartford Replacement of 1 no street light ownership dispute Works started but awaiting a fault repair on Home Gardens Dartford Replacement of 3 no street lights UKPN system before completing Mounts Rd Greenhithe Replacement of 8 concrete L/Col’s Completed 1 remaining due to Replacement of 4 no concrete lamp boundary Park Way Wilmington columns dispute completion by March 2019 Heathview Crescent Dartford Replacement of 9 no street lights All completed Heathlands Rise Dartford Replacement of 1 Lamp column Completed Dartford Replacement of 1 Lamp column Works programmed Orchard St completion by April 2019 Dartford Replacement of 3 Lamp columns Works programmed Summerville Rd completion by April 2019 Dartford Replacement of 2 Lamp columns Works programmed Lavinia Rd completion by April 2019 Dartford Replacement of 4 Lamp columns Works programmed Gladstone Rd completion by April 2019 Dartford Replacement of 4 Lamp columns Works programmed Tufnail Rd completion by April 2019 Dartford Replacement of 5 Lamp columns Works Westview Rd programmed completion by April 2019 Dartford Replacement of 13 Lamp columns Works programmed Great Queen St completion by April 2019 Dartford Replacement of 1 Lamp column Works programmed Almond Rd completion by April 2019 Dartford Replacement of 2 Lamp columns Works programmed Sharp Way completion by April 2019 Dartford Replacement of 2 Lamp columns Works programmed Strickland Ave completion by April 2019 Dartford Replacement of 6 Lamp columns Works programmed Howard Rd completion by April 2019 Dartford Replacement of 2 Lamp column Works programmed Barnham Rd completion by April 2019 Dartford Replacement of 2 Lamp column Works programmed Ivy Close completion by April 2019 Replacement of 2 Lamp column Awaiting Charles St Stone statutory drawings
Appendix D – Local Transport Plan funded (named schemes) and externally funded schemes
Local Growth Fund
Appendix – Local Growth Fund
Local Growth Fund programme update for the Dartford Borough.
The Department for Transport (DfT) added £100m to the Local Growth Fund (LGF) pot in order to fund Local Sustainable Transport Fund Style schemes. KCC subsequently submitted four Local Sustainable Transport Fund (LSTF) capital bids 1) East Kent – A network for Growth, 2) Kent Thameside – Integrated door-to-door journeys and 3) West Kent – Tackling Congestion. The fourth was for Tonbridge Town Centre Regeneration, which included a highway improvements scheme in the Lower High Street as well as additional LSTF style measures. The objective of all of the capital bids is to boost economic growth by decreasing carbon emissions and reducing congestion.
The Kent Thameside, West Kent and Tonbridge Town Centre Regeneration bids were all successful. The schemes aim to:
improve access to employment and services reduce the need to travel by the private car enhance pedestrian, cycle and public transport facilities improve sustainable transport connections
The following schemes have been submitted as part of the successful Kent Thameside LSTF this financial year.
Local Growth Fund (Transport Innovations)
Scheme Name Description of Works Current Status
Initial consultation with Members sent by email in December 2016 and only positive comments were received. Minor amendments to the design have since been completed and a further consultation followed. This consultation closed on 10th June 2018. Seven responses were received, six (86%) had an overall positive view on the proposed scheme. The positive comments recognised that the scheme would have an impact on improving the local cycle infrastructure and Installation of new shared use cycle route providing greater choice of route. on Princes Road (this scheme was Princes Road The decision made by KCC/DBC previously reported to the JTB on 3rd Cycle Route officers is to proceed with the December 2013). Delivery to be jointly implementation of the scheme. funded by S106 and LGF. The final report is available at www.kent.gov.uk/princesroad and was presented at the Sept JTB and approved. However, following a recent consultation relating to the Proposed Amendment of Restrictions Order related to Princes Road, concerns were raised by 3 affected businesses. Therefore, a decision has been made to return the scheme to the March JTB for a final decision, a report is attached. The works are on hold until a decision has been made. Appendix E – Developer Funded Works
Developer Funded Works (Section 278 Agreement Works) – Contact Officer Dave Miles (unless shown otherwise)
Scheme Name MasterGov Parish Description of Works Current Status File Ref No
Provision of new access on north side of existing Mill Pond Road Substantially complete. Former GSK Site Roundabout to facilitate First Cert. issued. DA087 Dartford – Junction A development. Awaiting street lighting Associated certification. improvements to existing roundabout.
Provision of new carriageway, footway, Hedge Place drainage & street Works in progress DA091 Stone Road lighting along frontage (Natalie Peach) of residential development
Minor carriageway widening and provision Substantially complete. of footpath and street Southfleet Road, Awaiting completion of DA2102 S & G lighting to Swanscombe remedials, as built accommodate new drawing. etc. access to Eastern Quarry development.
First Cert. issued. Installation of signalised St Clements Awaiting street lighting DA2131 Stone junction to serve new Way certification and as built housing development information
Alterations to existing highway and formation Cotton Lane of new access to serve Submission Rec’d. DA3021 Stone (Gantry Place) Stone PC community (Natalie Peach) centre & residential development
Provision of footway First Cert. issued. Will and alterations to not be signed off until Hedge Place existing highway to DA3026 Stone road is no longer in use Road accommodate for construction traffic. proposed residential (Natalie Peach) development
Construction of new Substantially complete. Former GSK Site Interim First Cert. DA3028 Dartford roundabout at Temple - Junction D Hill and installation of issued. Awaiting street associated traffic lighting certification etc. signals
Southfleet Road Provision of accesses First certificate issued (Former N.Grid DA3029 S & G to serve proposed (Jamie Hare) site) residential development Provision of new Works completed. On Powdermill Lane DA3031 Dartford culvert under existing Maintenance. highway Improvement to existing junction, Darenth Works in progress. construction of new Road/Powdermill DA3032 Darenth Awaiting street lighting footway as part of Lane install. (Natalie Peach) adjacent residential development. Formation of bell mouth Houses being Central Road – accesses for residential constructed on former DA3037 Dartford Junctions E & F development by Ward site compound before Homes. works can be finished.
First Cert. issued. New signalised cross Former GSK Site Awaiting completion of DA3050 Dartford road junction in Central – Junction B remedials and HF Road. Surfacing
Alterations to existing Substantially complete highway to provide Instone Road DA3051 Dartford awaiting documentation access to proposed Lidl store. (Natalie Peach)
Provision of traffic First Cert. issued. signals to existing Mill Former GSK Site Awaiting completion of DA3052 Dartford Pond Road, Overy – Junction C remedials and HF Street & Central Road Surfacing junction
Alteration to existing Substantially complete. Joyce Green highway to serve Street lighting & DA3061 Dartford Lane (west) development on former remedials outstanding. GSK car park. (Natalie Peach)
Substantially complete. Alteration to existing Minor remedials highway in conjunction Central Road DA3070 Dartford outstanding. (Natalie with development by Peach) Bellway Homes.
Provision of new Works substantially Halcrow Avenue footway and alteration complete, awaiting minor Phase 3 (The DA3081 Dartford to existing carriageway remedials & as built Bridge) for Phase 3 of records. residential development.
Provision of pedestrian crossing facilities in Works completed. On Charles Street – DA3094 Stone conjunction with new maintenance (Natalie Stone Crossing footbridge over railway Peach) by Network Rail.
Provision of new access and Lower Hythe Works due to commence DA3090 Dartford improvements to Street 04/02/19. existing footway by Weston Homes
Provision of access Awaiting amended Darenth Road DA3091 Dartford crossing Fastrack to submission. (Natalie (Acacia Hall) serve Acacia Hall Peach)
Green Street Provision of new Green footway to frontage of Submission rec’d. (Jamie DA3092 Darenth Road/Wood former Fox & Hounds Hare) Lane, Darenth PH.
Alteration to existing Submission being Churchill Close DA3093 Darenth vehicular access for negotiated. Winners Chapel
Provision of new Awaiting H & S file & as access and built drgs. (Natalie reconstruction of ex Spring Vale Peach) DA3094 Dartford carriageway due to (South) subsidence caused by excavation by Lidl contractor
Littlebrook Provision of two Works due to commence Manorway DA3096 Dartford accesses for proposed 04/02/19.. (North) Mercedes showroom
Provision of new footway and turning Coleridge facility and vehicular Road/Shaftsbury DA3099 Dartford Works in progress. access as part of Lane residential development.
Provision of new Brunel Way (The Works completed. On DA3101 Dartford footway etc. for Leigh Bridge) Maintenance UTC.
Improvements to highway as part of Awaiting submission of Market Street, DA3106 Dartford Town Centre design & details Regeneration. Residential development by Lowfield Street, DA3129 Dartford Awaiting submission Bellway Homes at north end of Lowfield Street
New access for commercial TA issued. Temp. access development at Plot 4 Littlebrook constructed. Permanent DA3149 Dartford “Quadron Park” and Manorway works not due for some closure of existing months. access in Halcrow Avenue.
Provision of traffic London Road, signal junction to serve Submission rec’d. (Jamie DA3156 Stone Stone Pit 2 proposed development Hare) in Stone Pit 2
Hook Green New access to Hook Agreement in place. DA3157 Southfleet Road Green Farm House (Natalie Peach)
Proposed Zebra Crossing to serve Southfleet Road DA3166 Swanscombe Awaiting submission Eastern Quarry development
Appendix F – Bridge Works
Bridge Works – Contact Officer Earl Bourner
Road Name Parish Description of Works Current Status
No works planned Appendix G – Traffic Systems
There is a programme of scheduled maintenance to refurbish life expired traffic signal equipment across the county based upon age and fault history. The delivery of these schemes is dependent upon school terms and holiday periods; local residents, businesses and schools will be informed verbally and by a letter drop of the exact dates when known.
Traffic Systems - Contact Officer: Toby Butler
Location Description of Works Current Status
Refurbishment of traffic Completed September A225 Lowfield Street/ Oakfield Lane signal controlled junction 2018
Appendix H – Combined Member Fund
Member Highway Fund programme update for the Dartford District. The following schemes are those, which have been approved for funding by both the relevant Member and by Simon Jones, Director of Highways, Transportation and Waste. The list only includes schemes, which are in design at consultation stage about to be programmed recently completed on site
The list is up to date as of 30th January 2019 The details given below are for highway projects only, this report does not detail; Contributions Members have made to other groups such as parish councils Highway studies Traffic & non-motorised user surveys funded by Members.
More information on the schemes listed below contact the Project Manager for the Combined Member Grant or the District Manager for Dartford.
Ann Allen (Wilmington) Details of Scheme Status Proposed corner protection Objections Joydens Wood Road j/w Maryfields Close and Wood Close received via public consultation. To be reviewed. Proposed corner protection No High Road Wilmington j/w The Close objections received via public consultation. To be reviewed.
Proposed corner protection No Hawley Road/Access to Eloise Court objections received via public consultation. TRO has been sealed
Penny Cole (Dartford East) Details of Scheme Status London Road Stone o/s The Brent Primary School Data Proposed zebra crossing assessed from ATC. Design to be progressed.
Peter Harman (Swanscombe & Greenhithe) Details of Scheme Status No current highway schemes
Jeremy Kite MBE (Dartford Rural) Details of Scheme Status No current highway schemes
David Butler (Dartford North East) Details of Scheme Status Joyce Green Lane north of Bob Dunn Way Installation of verge marker posts in the carriageway on both sides of the road to Works prevent lorries parking overnight and eliminate the problem of fly tipping. complete
Marsh Street (north) Design completed 1 x Build out to be removed to bring it in line with design standards Works ordered
Halcrow Avenue Concept Prohibition of Driving - to prevent rat running design Henderson Drive Temple Hill Concept Looking into various methods to reduce speed design
Footpath from Brunel Way to Joyce Green Lane via footbridge Concept Investigating a lighting scheme design
Jan Ozog (Dartford West) Details of Scheme Status Heather Drive j/w Shepherds Lane Concept Looking at options to prevent HGV’s turning left into Heather Drive. design
1.1 Legal Implications
1.1.1 Not applicable.
1.2 Financial and Value for Money Considerations
1.2.1 Not applicable.
1.3 Risk Assessment
1.3.1 Not applicable.
Contacts: Carol Valentine / Denise Sutton 03000 418181
KENT COUNTY COUNCIL
ENVIRONMENT & TRANSPORT CABINET COMMITTEE
MINUTES of a meeting of the Environment & Transport Cabinet Committee held in the Darent Room - Sessions House on Thursday, 17 January 2019.
PRESENT: Mr M A C Balfour (Chairman), Mr M D Payne (Vice-Chairman), Mrs R Binks (Substitute for Mr A Booth), Mr T Bond, Mr A Cook, Mr N J Collor, Mr S Holden, Mr A R Hills, Mr D L Brazier (Substitute for Mr R C Love, OBE), Mr G Cooke (Substitute for Mr P J Messenger), Mr J M Ozog, Mr I S Chittenden, Mr R H Bird (Substitute for Mr A J Hook), Mr B H Lewis, Mr M E Whybrow and Mr H Rayner
ALSO PRESENT: Mr P M Hill, OBE and Mr M Whiting
IN ATTENDANCE: Mr S Jones (Director of highways, Transportation and Waste), Miss G Little (Democratic Services Officer) and Ms S Holt (Head of Culture & Sport Group)
UNRESTRICTED ITEMS
140. Chairman's Announcements (Item1)
1. The Chairman proposed that supporting documentation be no longer be printed in the agenda pack for the Environment and Transport Cabinet Committee as it was available electronically and that printed copies be provided to Members only on request.
2. RESOLVED that in future, supporting documentation be provided electronically and not printed in the agenda pack for the Environment and Transport Cabinet Committee. Printed copies would however be provided on request.
141. Apologies and Substitutes (Item 2)
Apologies were received from Mr P Messenger, Mr A Hook, Mr R Love and Mr A Booth. Mr G Cooke, Mr R Bird, Mr D Brazier and Mrs R Binks attended as substitutes respectively.
142. Declarations of Interest by Members in items on the Agenda (Item 3)
There were no declarations of interest received.
143. Minutes of the meeting held on 28 November 2018 (Item 4)
1 RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting on 28 November 2019 are a correct record and that they be signed by the Chairman subject to the removal of minute 125.3 (Declaration of interest).
144. Verbal Update (Item 5)
1. Mr M Hill (Cabinet Member for Community and Regulatory Services) gave a verbal update on the following issues:
Accuracy of Kent Police Crime Recording: Kent Police’s crime-recording arrangements that had previously been graded as inadequate had recently undergone inspection from Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) and were rated as outstanding. Mr Hill said that he written to the Chief Constable to congratulate Kent Police on behalf of Kent County Council.
Update of the Preparations for Brexit: Within Mr Hill’s portfolio, the two areas that would sustain the greatest impact as a result of Brexit would be the Emergency Planning Service and Trading Standards.
The Emergency Planning Service had been engaged in developing plans for the multi-agency Kent Resilience Forum and the operational plan had been trialled with further training exercises planned for February and March 2019. The existing mutual aid arrangements with the seven South East authorities were also in the process of being revised. Training in multiagency response and recovery had also been arranged for Duty Directors, Managers and other staff; and a command rota was being developed to cover Kent County Councils response over a six-month period and based on a 24/7-hour response rate. Kent County Council was also leading on its multiagency communications planning and an internal communications plan was being developed to raise staff awareness. Across the directorate, a resilience group had also been established and this would meet monthly with regular progress and monitoring reports. Kent County Council was also reviewing its business continuity plans and had set up a number of workshops which were also being held for Challenger and Environment Planning and Enforcement staff.
The Trading Standards Service which was the area most affected by Brexit was undertaking recruitment for additional border force staff. Brexit may require multi-port operational activities which would have detrimental effect on the Council’s resources.
2 2. Mr M Whiting (Cabinet Member for Planning, Highways, Transport and Waste) gave a verbal update on the following issues:
Update of the Preparations for Brexit: Kent County Council had been awarded £29 million of capital grant funding from the Transport Secretary to begin construction on road improvements and infrastructure in preparation for leaving the EU on 29 March 2020. This included work at Manston Airport, a new TAP outside Dover on the A256 and work on the A249, A25 and A20 amongst others. Additional funding was also anticipated for the operational resources to support the work which would be granted following the finalisation of the Traffic Management and Enforcement Compliance Plans as part of the multiagency work within the Kent Resilience Forum.
Manston Airport Trial: The Manston trial took place on 7 January 2019 in preparation for operation Brock. The purpose of the trial was to test the proposed entry and exit points of the site, the release rate of the Heavy Good Vehicles (HGVs) and the time it took for the vehicles to travel from Manston to the Port of Dover, via the to the port of new TAP on the A256. There were 89 vehicles from several companies who took part in the tow trial runs, one at 08:00am which released the vehicles in batches of 25 and one at 11:00am which released 83 at once. The results showed that a steady flow of traffic could be maintained down to the Port with assistance from well-trained onsite staff.
Bus Portal: A new bus feedback from was due to be launched on 28 January 2019 on Kent County Council’s Bus portal website. The form would enable residents to provide feedback on the Council’s subsidised bus services and those provided by commercial operators. The information gathered would then be shared at the bus operator’s regular quarterly quality bus partnership meetings and recurring issues would be sent to the Traffic Commissioner on behalf of the residents. Communication was due to be circulated to Members, Parish Councils and the general public.
Winter Service: With regard to emergency planning for the winter season, Mr Whiting said that 23,000 tonnes of salt had been stocked, 17 new gritter lorries had been procured, salt bins had been filled and Parish Councils had offered residents salt bags. As of 7 January 2019, Kent County Council had carried out 12 salting runs across the county and were due to finish the installation of brine saturations by the end of February 2019.
Waste Transfer Station: The Waste Transfer Station took longer to clear as a result of increased demand over the Christmas period, however, Kent County Council
3 increased its resources across all waste sites and extended its opening hours to manage service demand. This was a short-term pressure and capacity issues had since been resolved.
3. Mr Hill, Mr Whiting and Mr Jones (Director of Highways, Transportation and Waste) responded to comments and questions from Members, including the following: -
(a) Mr Whiting acknowledged Members concerns regarding compliance and enforcement which was an issue recognised by a number of agencies. The Leader of Kent County Council had addressed this with the Home Secretary, Transport Secretary and other partner agencies in an attempt to understand what powers already existed, who was responsible for those powers and whether new ones needed to be created to enable enforcement. Supplementary to this, Mr Jones said that there were designated facilities within the Kent strategic road network for freight which managed the flow of traffic in and out of Dover. The Compliance Strategy adopted a similar approach in order to successfully control the direction and flow of traffic.
(b) In response to Government funding, Mr Whiting confirmed that the £29 million would be awarded to Kent County Council before 29 March 2020 to ensure that the infrastructure was in place.
(c) Mr Jones said that a dedicated team had been established to manage the work issued to supply chains and confirmed that there were no anticipated issues with delivering the routine work. Communication to the general public regarding the routine works would be carried out in advance and this would be done through consultation or via letter.
(d) In response to Members concerns regarding the recruitment of veteran surgeons at the Port of Dover, Mr Hill agreed to liaise with officers and respond to Members directly.
(e) With regard to salt bins, Mr Whiting asked Members to report empty salt bins to Simon Jones and said that a review of empty salt bins would be carried out
4. RESOLVED that the verbal update be noted, with thanks.
145. KCC response to the Gatwick Airport draft Master Plan 2018 (Item 6)
Katie Pettit (Principle Transport Planner) and Joe Ratcliffe (Transport Strategy Manager) were in attendance for this item.
4 1. Ms Pettit introduced the report which set out Kent County Council’s proposed response to Gatwick Airport’s consultation on it’s draft Master Plan 2018, which closed on 10 January 2019. Ms Pettit set out the three scenarios suggested by Gatwick to support the airports growth, Kent County Council’s opposition to the proposed expansion and invited Members comments for inclusion within the response that would be sent to Gatwick.
2. Mr Balfour welcomed comments and questions from the Committee:
(a) Mr Lake (Member for Sevenoaks Rural South) was invited to speak. Mr Lake commended the report and endorsed the response from Kent County Council. Two points of concern however included the negative impact of air pollution as a result of Gatwick’s proposed expansion and the congestion of traffic on the M25 motorway to Gatwick.
(b) Mr Bird welcomed the report, however, requested that strengthened wording be included within the response that highlighted the necessity of improved railway connections into Gatwick.
(c) Members echoed the concerns raised and commended the officers report.
3.RESOLVED that the proposed Kent County Council response to the consultation be endorsed subject to the inclusion of a strengthened proposal regarding rail connections into Gatwick.
146. Sub-national Transport Bodies: Transport for the South East (Item 7)
Joe Ratcliffe (Transport Strategy Manager) was in attendance for this item.
1. Mr Payne introduced the report which outlined the proposed establishment of a Sub-national Transport Body (STB) for the South East; Transport for the South East (TfSE), which if approved by Government, would have statutory powers post 2020.
2. Mr Ratcliffe advised the Committee that the purpose of the report was to ensure that Members were made aware of the forthcoming consultation on the proposal that would be submitted by TfSE to Government and that Members would have an opportunity to view the response following the consultation at the Committee in July 2019.
3. The Mr Payne and Mr Ratcliffe responded to comments and questions from Members, including the following: -
(a) In response to Members request to include data collation and publication within the list of statutory powers proposed by the TfSE, Mr Payne said that the powers that had been reviewed and investigated for inclusion within the current stage of the proposal were those which were deemed acceptable for submission to Government.
5 (b) With regard to whether the transport body was self-contained, Mr Payne assured the Committee that the proposed establishment of an STB was a result of the South East 7 (SE7) councils that sought to establish connectivity through the South East and other southern areas of Britain to Berkshire. The list within the report deliberately failed to mention Essex and East Anglia whom may in future years establish its own equivalent to a strategic Sub-national Transport Body.
(c) Mr Payne assured Members that the TfSE would be operating inline with existing highways authorities and said that there was no intention to interfere with funding or work being managed at a local level.
4. RESOLVED that the report be noted.
147. 19/00001 - Policy to adopt charging for non-household waste materials at Household Waste Recycling Centres (Item 8)
David Beaver (Head of Waste Management and Business services) and Hannah Allard (Waste Business Development Manager) were in attendance for this item.
1. Mr D Beaver introduced the report which set out the findings of the consultation and the recommended proposed changes to Kent County Council’s operating policy to adopt charging for non-household waste materials at Household Waste Recycling Centres (HWRCs). Mr Beaver highlighted to Members that the current waste infrastructure would not cope with the anticipated levels of waste growth as a result of forecasted population increase and therefore, the recommended policy changes aimed to reduce demand on site, create revenue streams and create clearer intelligence that would enable more successful enforcement against individuals defrauding the Authority through illegal disposal of trade and commercial waste.
2. Ms H Allard drew Members attention to the results of the public consultation (set out within the report) and the key concerns from the public regarding the proposal to introduce charging at HWRCs. The most common concern cited by the consultation was the perception of increased fly-tippng, however, Ms Allard confirmed that there was no significant evidence which suggested charging at HWRCs impacted on this. Out of the authorities that had introduced charging, twelve had seen no impact or minimal impact and four said they had seen an increase; however, this was inline with national trends.
3. Mr S Jones (Director of Highways, Transportation and Waste) informed the Committee that the list on page 77 of the agenda pack had been revised
6 since its publication and that garden ornaments (clay and concrete) should not have been listed within the table of chargeable waste materials.
4. The officers then responded to comments and questions from Members, including the following: -
(a) Mr Beaver assured Members that communication and training for HWRC staff was key. Following comments received as part of the public consultation, the KCC Waste Management Officers amended the policy to include staff discretion around the charging of waste disposal.
(b) In response to concerns regarding fly-tipping as a result of charging at HWRCs, Mr Beaver informed the Committee that his role as an officer was to present the facts as they were received and provide Members with the opportunity to resolve the operational issues that Kent County Council faced during a time of unprecedented change. Mr Beaver referred to neighbouring authorities that took the decision to prohibit their residents from depositing soil, rubble, hardcore and plasterboard and agreed that if Kent had adopted the same approach, fly-tipping may have been an issue. However, Members of the Council were clear that they wanted to protect the network and wanted to continue to provide services to the public. As alluded to previously, the evidence did not support that charging at HWRCs would negatively impact on fly-tipping.
(c) With regards to how fly-tipping is measured, Mr Beaver confirmed that it was measured via the number of incidents, not the weight in tonnage.
(d) Members commended the work of the officers and the cross-party Members Working Group who had approached the matter in a strategic and pragmatic fashion which helped to form the structured committee debate.
5. RESOLVED that the proposed decision (19/000701) to be taken by the Cabinet Member for Planning, Highways, Transport and Waste to introduce disposal charges for soil, rubble, hardcore and plasterboard at the KCC HWRCs, with charges as follows:
Soil, rubble and hardcore: £4 per bag (or part bag)/ item (a bag being up to the size of a standard black sack); Plasterboard: £6 per bag (or part bag)/ sheet (a bag being up to the size of a standard black sack); and A daily limit on soil, rubble and hardcore, of a maximum of 5 bags/ items per day,
be endorsed.
7 (Mr B Lewis asked for his vote against this decision to be recorded)
148. 18/00068 - Managing Kent's Highways Infrastructure (Item 9)
Andrew Loosemore (Head of Highways Asset Management), Alan Casson (Strategic Asset Manager) and David Latham (Highway Policy and Inspections Manager) were in attendance for this item.
1. Mr Loosemore introduced the report which set out the proposal to adopt and publish two key asset management strategy documents which would enable the Council to evidence a Band 3 Incentive Fund rating and maximise Department for Transport (DfT) capital funding for 2019/20. He also introduced a document containing proposed Service Level Risk Assessments to complete our initial implementation of the new Well Managed Highway Infrastructure Code of Practice and support KCC’s ability to defend claims.
2. The officers then responded to comments and questions from Members, including the following: -
(a) With regard to the maintenance of footways, specifically in relation to over- crowded residential parking and the damage caused by utility companies, Mr Balfour (Chairman) informed the Committee that the Kent Design Guide was under review and that the comments received from Members had been noted by the officers.
(b) In response to concerns regarding flooding and drainage, Mr Loosemore said this was managed through a risk-based approach and resources were deployed using a prioritised order. In terms of residential areas of flooding, the drainage team would adopt a reactive cleansing approach based on reports received from the general public and the routine highways safety inspections. However, the strategic network which caused greater risk to property owners, road users and residents required a proactive, systematic approach. The drainage team had also introduced a new structure with six additional engineers, a new team leader and a new technical support officer, all of whom would be responsible for carrying out routine work and finding innovative solutions to recurring drainage problems.
(c) Members commended the report and the work of the officers.
3. RESOLVED that the proposed decision (18/00068) to be taken by the Cabinet Member for Planning, highways, Transport and Waste on:
(a) the Asset Management strategy documents that, once formally adopted and published, will form the basis of evidencing a Band 3 Incentive Fund rating and secure Department for Transport capital funding of £4.6m in 2019/20; and
(b) the proposed Service Level Risk Assessments which record our current approach to highway maintenance and associated risks which, once formally adopted and published, will complete our initial implementation of
8 the new Code of Practice. In turn this supports KCC ability to put forward a special defence in accordance with S58 of the Highways Act,
be endorsed.
149. 18/00072 - Thanet and Sevenoaks Bus Service changes - Report into Public Consultation and Recommended Action (Item 10)
Mr Phil Lightowler (Head of Public Transport) was in attendance for this item.
1. Mr P Lightowler introduced the report which set out the proposed changes, the consultation outcomes and the recommendations for changes to the Thanet and Sevenoaks bus services that were provisionally planned for implementation from 1 April 2019.
2. Mr Balfour welcomed comments and questions from the Committee regarding the proposed changes to the Sevenoaks bus service:
(a) Mr Lake (Member for Sevenoaks Rural South) was invited to speak. Mr Lake requested that the proposed changes to remove the earlier and later 404 bus services from Sevenoaks to Edenbridge be reviewed due to the negative impact that this would have on school children and commuters.
b) Mr Rayner (Member for Malling West) sought agreement to use his Combined Members Grant with additional contributions from neighbouring parishes to fund a replacement bus service for Sevenoaks.
3. Mr Lightowler responded to comments and questions from Members, including the following: -
(a) In response to Mr Lake’s concerns regarding the proposed withdrawal of the 6:00pm service, Mr Lightowler confirmed that the Go Coach operator and Kent County Council had deployed inspectors to travel on the Sevenoaks route to determine the number of regular users who were reliant on the 6:00pm service. The outcome of the inspections did not support the need for a 6:00pm commuter journey. With regards to the bus operator’s ability to manage increased demand as a result of school expansions, Mr Lightowler informed the Committee that major expansions were planned of the Sevenoaks schools and there were plans to review the future bus network. He said that Kent County Council as the Public Transport Body would be meeting with bus operators, Trinity School and the Weald of Kent in the near future. Mr Lightowler acknowledged that this information was not within the consultation proposal document, however, he wanted to assure Members of the Committee that a separate piece of work which focused
9 on the school network had commenced. Mr Lightowler agreed to liaise with Mr Lake outside of the Committee meeting.
(b) In response to Mr Rayner’s suggestion, Mr Lightowler agreed to liaise with Mr Rayner and the Parish Council’s to determine whether a replacement bus service could be achieved using Combined Member Grants.
4. Mr Balfour welcomed comments and questions from the Committee regarding the proposed changes to the Thanet bus service:
(a) Mrs Binks (Member for Broadstairs) raised the following points:
The information within the report was incorrect as the number 56 bus service did not travel into Ramsgate,
whilst pleased that consultation resulted in the replacement service of the number 37 bus, Mrs Binks asked why the report failed to mention the two petitions and earlier public consultation meetings in relation to the 56 bus and why the offer made by residents to pay for the retention of the 56 service had not been followed up by officers; and
the proposed new route and timetable offered by the 37 bus service meant that fewer buses would be going to the hospital and would require those attending hospital appointments to walk a greater distance; both of which had a negative impact upon the elderly and disabled. Mrs Binks sought confirmation as to whether the timetables would be reviewed and whether the 37 bus service would be subject to discontinuation in the future.
(b) Mr Lewis (Member for Margate) addressed concerns of social isolation and the negative impact that the proposed changes would have on Thanet as one of the most socially and economically deprived areas within Kent. With regard to the altered service stop which was a further 0.6 miles away from the city centre, Mr Lewis echoed the concerns of Mrs Binks and asked what assessment criteria had been applied to determine the effect on the elderly, those with disabilities and those with young children.
5. Mr Lightowler responded to comments and questions from Members, including the following: -
(a) In response to the concerns raised by Mrs Binks, Mr Lightowler confirmed that contracts were due to be withdrawn, however, these would be replaced by changes to the commercial network to ensure minimal impact to the user. The replacement of the number 56 service
10 with the 37 service was Stagecoach’s response in terms of what they could provide to counteract the impact caused by the withdrawal of the number 56 service. With regards to the timetable, Stagecoach had agreed to review this, specifically the 09:24am journey as the new proposed time prohibited usage of the English National Concessionary Travel Scheme (ENCTS) bus pass. In response to whether the 37 bus service could be discontinued at some point in the future, Mr Lightowler said that Kent County Council could not hold commercial operators to a contractual time limit, however, he provided assurance that Stagecoach were continuing to invest within the Thanet network and further expansion was planned for 2019/20.
(b) In response to the points raised by Mr Lewis, Mr Lightowler said that out of the 625 average daily users, only 108 had responded to the consultation which suggested that the revised network offered by the commercial bus service suited most user’s needs. There had also been two drop-in sessions whereby officers sat and spoke with individuals about their journey and could advise that person of the best alternative bus route. In response to comments regarding social isolation, Kent County Council aimed to achieve savings within its subsidised bus routes by offering alternative commercial services to its users and safeguard communities that only have access to one or two buses a week.
6. Mr Lightowler and Mr Whiting (Cabinet Member for Planning, Highways, Transport and Waste) then responded to general comments and questions from Members on the proposed changes to the Thanet and Sevenoaks bus services, including the following: -
(a) In response to questions from Mr Whybrow, Mr Lightowler said that Kent County Council preferred not to use the Bus Funding Criteria Tool on this occasion as it would have automatically focused on services that cost more per passenger subsidy. By adopting an intelligence led approach and liaising with all operators, the Council was able to find alternative routes within the commercial services network which would help generate savings and protect services that needed to remain in place. Supplementary to this, Mr Balfour (Chairman) and Mr M Whiting (Cabinet Member for Planning, Highways, Transport and Waste) supported Mr Whybrow’s request for a cross-party Member Working Group.
(b) Mr Whiting confirmed that he would take into account Members comments and questions when taking the proposed decision (18/00072) and would respond in his verbal update to the issues raised by Members.
7. RESOLVED that the comments and concerns raised by Members be noted and that that the proposed decision (18/00072) to be taken by the Cabinet
11 Member for Planning, Highways, Transport and Waste to implement the changes to selected bus services in Thanet and Sevenoaks effective from April 2019, be endorsed.
(Mr B Lewis asked for his vote against this decision to be recorded)
150. 18/00073 - Thanet Transport Strategy (Item 11)
Tim Read (Head of Transportation) and James Wraight (Principle Transport and Development Planner) were in attendance for this item.
1. Mr Read introduced the report which provided an overview of the proposed changes to the revised draft Thanet District Transport Strategy and its progress to date and commended Mr Wraight, the responsible officer, for the work he had done.
2. The officers then responded to comments and questions from Members, including the following: -
(a) Mr Wraight said that in terms of the Bus Strategy, the purpose of the inner-circuit was to provide additional routes within the district using commercially viable bus services. The objective of the Thanet Transport Strategy was to support the proposed growth and identify where enhanced bus services could be provided on a commercial basis. In terms of the financial implications, it was anticipated that the necessary highway structure would be funded by development with no financial commitment expected from Kent County Council, however, Thanet District Council may impose a Community Infrastructure Levy for other elements highways infrastructure.
(b) In response to concerns regarding Thanet District Council’s cycling schemes and how this may be incorporated into the Thanet Transport Strategy, Mr Wraight said that the strategy did not replace Thanet’s walking and cycling strategy, nor did the strategy contain a comprehensive list of all possible interventions that could happen within the Thanet area. The prime purpose of the Thanet Transport strategy was to clearly draw on the interventions, considered by Kent County Council, to be key in supporting planned growth.
(c) Mr Wraight confirmed that the likely impact of growth on Brenley Corner had been determined using a separate modelling process, the results of which did not support the perception that Brenley Corner would incur significant impact. Due to the modest level of anticipated traffic impact
12 from the Local Plan growth, it is expected that the Thanet Local Plan would not be required to produce a mitigation strategy at this junction.
(d) Members paid tribute to the officers for their work and their continued transparency when presenting information to the Local Joint Transportation Board.
3. RESOLVED that the proposed decision (18/00073) to be taken by the Cabinet Member for Planning, highways, Transport and Waste on the revised Thanet Transport Strategy for subsequent consideration through the Thanet Local Plan examination process, be endorsed.
151. Capital Programme 2019-22, Revenue Budget 2019-20 and Medium-Term Financial Plan 2019-22 (Item 12)
Mr K Tilson (Finance Business Partner for the GET directorate) was in attendance for this item.
1. Mr Tilson introduced the report that was designed to accompany the Draft Budget Book 2019-22 published on 2 January 2019 and referred to the revenue savings and additional spend demands that were of particular interest to the Committee, as well as the new schemes being proposed for inclusion into the capital programme for 2019/20.
2. RESOLVED that the draft capital and revenue budgets and Medium-Term Financial Plan (MTFP), including responses to consultation and government provisional settlement, be noted.
152. Work Programme (Item 13)
RESOLVED that the work programme be noted, subject to the inclusion of the following items:
(a) Country Parks Management Report
(b) Response from Government following the submission of the to the Sub- national Transport body proposal
153. Pothole Blitz Contract Management (Item 14)
Andrew Loosemore (Head of Highway Asset Management) and Kirstie Williams (Mid Kent Highways Manager) were in attendance for this item.
1. Ms Williams introduced the report that provided an overview of the Pothole Blitz contract and the controls in place to ensure the effective management
13 of the contract. In terms of monitoring, the recent recruitment within the district teams amounted to 59 additional staff members whose prime responsibility was to monitor the progression of contracted works, a further three dedicated Clerks of Work were employed who were responsible for attending every construction site to ensure there were no defects. Kent County Council had also recently obtained the power to fine contractors if they breached street works permitting and as a result, an additional 12 staff members were employed to carry out ad-hoc inspections on street works. Ms Williams also highlighted to Members that the Pothole contract had delivered a substantial number of repairs across the district, including 54,000 individual potholes and over 267,000 square meters of larger patchwork repairs.
(a) In response to the commissioning framework principles, Ms Williams said that Kent County Council, like other local authorities, would write conditions into their contracts which required them to meet employment laws.
2. RESOLVED that the contents of the report be noted.
14