DOCSLIB.ORG

Brief Comment: Dicke Superradiance and Superfluorescence Find Application for Remote Sensing in Air

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brief Comment: Dicke Superradiance and Superfluorescence Find Application for Remote Sensing in Air Brief comment: Dicke Superradiance and Superfluorescence Find Application for Remote Sensing in Air D. C. Dai* Physics Department, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom *Corresponding author: [email protected] Received Month X, XXXX; revised Month X, XXXX; accepted Month X, XXXX; posted Month X, XXXX (Doc. ID XXXXX); published Month X, XXXX This letter briefly introduces the concepts of Dicke superradiance (SR) and superfluorescence (SF), their difference to amplified spontaneous emission (ASE), and the hints for identifying them in experiment. As a typical example it analyzes the latest observations by Dogariu et al. (Science 331 , 442, 2011), and clarifies that it is SR. It also highlights the revealed potential significant application of SR and SF for remote sensing in air. © 2011 Optical Society of America OCIS Codes: 020.1670, 270.1670, 260.7120, 010.0280, 280.1350 In 1954 Dicke predicted the cooperative emission from a In contrast to SR and SF, amplified spontaneous dense excited two-level system of gaseous atoms or emission (ASE) is the collective emission from such a molecules in population inversion in the absence of a laser similar but purely incoherent system. In ASE process, all cavity [1], soon after, Bonifacio and Lugiato termed it into the modes of spontaneous emission within gain can be two distinct forms [2]: Dicke Superradiance (SR) and amplified by stimulated emission in a single pass through Superfluorescence (SF). In a simplified picture, SR is from the excitation volume, yet among them the mode with the such an energy level prepared directly by laser into a maximum gain gradually wins others by competition quantum state which has an initial macroscopic dipole effect, and finally results in coherent output at the end [3]. (coherence); whereas SF is from an initially incoherent Fig. 1 illustrates three cases above. energy level, which later on spontaneously builds-up a In experiments, the phenomena of ASE, SR and SF are macroscopic dipole, in this case the system is started by all appeared as stimulated emission or mirror-less lasing, normal fluorescent emission (FL), then gives rise to SF their behaviors are quite similar to each other: they share pulse, having a characteristic induction time ( τD) for the the observable features based upon a clear threshold coherence development [2,3]. Both SR and SF are greatly determined by population inversion, such as spectral line limited by an opposed factor, the dephasing time (T2 or narrowing, exponentially growing intensity as pump T2*, defined by the inverse of linewidth of a corresponding power, and drastically shortened emission lifetime, optical transition containing homogeneous broadening directionality and polarization of emission beam etc , these only or inhomogeneous broadening respectively), which usually bring much confusion to researcher in a test to always acts to destroy the coherence [2,3]. identify a specific case of SR or SF from the more common cases of ASE [3]. Given the facts that SR and SF have been successfully E E4 E4 4 observed predominantly in gaseous systems [4], since the E3 E3 E3 first report in HF gas in 1973 [5], some hints are summarized here: in frequency domain, (i) doing energy laser ( τττ ) SR τττ ASE ppp laser ( ppp) level analyses as shown in Fig. 1, SR is from such an E E E 2 2 2 energy level resonantly populated by a pump laser, (ii) E E 1 E1 1 checking exponential index by fitting pump power (a) (c ) dependent intensity growth, both SR and SF have an explicit index of 2.0 by definition in the case of single E4 E4 E4 photon excitation, or 4.0 in two-photon excitation, for ASE E E E 3 3 3 it could be any number; then in time domain, (iii) looking laser ( τττ ) FL τττ SF for any quantum effect for SR and SF, such as the ppp time ( DDD) E2 E2 E2 interference effect, quantum beats and ringing, which are E1 E1 E1 the characteristics of the emission from coherent states, (b) whereas ASE lacks of these; (iv) trying to resolve a time delay, τD, between normal FL and lasing with a short pulse duration of pump laser, τp. This τD is unique for SF, Fig. 1. (Color online) Illustration of SR (a), SF (b) and ASE (c) yet absent in both SR and ASE; (v) checking T 2* and in a four-energy-level system in laser physics. Here, E 3 has τp τp 2 relatively longer lifetime than E 4 and E 2, the fast relaxation from comparing it to , if is apparently longer than T *, the E4 to E 3 leads to population accumulation on E 3 and results in a emission is most possibly ASE rather than SR or SF; (vi) population inversion between E 3 and E 2. The property of specifically, SF intensity exhibits quantum noise due to its emission from E 3 is determined by its dephasing time (T 2*), for triggering mechanism, and has other quantitative example, in (a) if T 2*<< τp it is not SR but ASE. measures and criteria [6]. Very recently, Dogariu et al. report the backward lasing benefit the remote sensing techniques for detecting the in air for remote sensing [7]. In their observations the 3P molecules and gas pollutants, with their specific finger- 3P level of Oxygen atom is resonantly populated by two- print emission lines, for example, 845 nm from Oxygen photon excitation with ultrashort laser pulse at 226 nm, atom, or 337 nm from N 2 molecule. Also a fantastic idea the backward emission at 845 nm from this level has good arisen is that, these significant applications could be directionality comparing to the lateral FL, the distinct extended to study the atoms in the sun, a huge burning power index of 4.2, which is consistent to the previous sphere. report [8], is in agreement with the theoretical value of 4.0 for two-photon excitation, these obviously fit the case (a) References in Fig. 1; furthermore, by considering the pulse width is 1. R. H. Dicke, “Coherence in spontaneous radiation more than two orders of magnitude shorter than the FL processes ,” Phys. Rev. 939393,93 99 (1954). lifetime, the evidence clearly points to SR, however, this 2. R. Bonifacio and L. A. Lugiato, “ Cooperative has not been discussed or claimed by authors. By the radiation processes in two-level systems: super instrumentally limited linewidth of 0.1 nm the estimated fluorescence ,” Phys. Rev. A 111111,11 1507 (1975). T2*>24 ps, this is on the same order of magnitude as 3. A. E. Siegman, “Amplified spontaneous emission and τp=100 ps used here, given the typical T 2* value of gaseous mirrorless lasers,” in Lasers (University Science Books, system at room temperature is on nanosecond range [4-6], California, 1986), chap. 13.8, pp. 547-557. which is apparently longer than τp=100 ps, it can clearly 4. M. S. Feld and J. C. MacGillivray, “Superradiance ,” clarify that the backward lasing at 845 nm in [7] is due to Top. Curr. Phys. 212121,21 7 (1980). SR not ASE. 5. N. Skribanowitz, I. P. Herman, J. C. MacGillivray, and In an earlier report, Luo et al. observed the backward M. S. Feld, “ Observation of Dicke superradiance in lasing at 357 nm from N 2 in an air plasma created by optically pumped HF gas ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 303030,30 309 femtosecond laser, and simply interpreted it as ASE by (1973). the evidence of exponential growth and gain [9]. In this 6. M. F. H. Schuurmans, Q. H. F. Vrehen, and D. Polder, case it can be sure that the N 2 molecules are not “Superfluorescence ,” Adv. Atom. Mol. Phys. 171717,17 167 resonantly excited by the pump laser at 810 nm used (1981). there, whereas the very short τp (42 fs) than typical T 2* 7. A. Dogariu, J. B. Michael, M. O. Scully, and R. B. Miles, value implies that the system should have sufficiently “High-gain backward lasing in air,” Science 331331, 442 long time to develop coherence and radiates SF pulse, as (2011). the case (b) in Fig. 1. However, in order to confirm this to 8. M. Aldén, U. Westblom, and J. E. M. Goldsmith, “Two- be SF, more detailed studies are required to find more photon stimulated emission from atomic oxygen in characteristic features, like τD, an explicit power index, flames and cold gases,” Opt. Lett. 141414,14 305 (1989). quantum noise and possible quantum beating, ringing etc , 9. Q. Luo, W. Liu, and S. L. Chin, “Lasing action in air together with quantitative analyses. induced by ultra-fast laser filamentation,” Appl. Phys. B In summary, the backward Dicke SR and SF from 767676,76 337 (2003). laser plasma in atmospheric environment will potentially .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 LASERS LASER Is the Acronym for Light Amplification by Stimulated
    1 LASERS LASER is the acronym for Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. Laser is a light source but quite different from conventional light sources. In conventional light sources different atoms emit radiations at different times and in different directions and there is no phase relationship between them Light from an incandescent lamp is an example of incoherent radiation and it is spread over a continuous range of wavelengths The characteristics of laser light : i) The light is coherent which means that waves all exactly in phase with one another It is possible to observe interference effects from two independent lasers ii) The light is monochromatic ( same frequency ) in the visible region of the electromagnetic spectrum. The spread in wavelength () is extremely small. Ordinary incandescent light is spread over a continuous range iii) The beam is very narrow, highly directional and does not diverge . The directionality of the laser beam is expressed in terms of divergence = ( r2 --r1)/ ( D2 --D1) where r2 and r1 are the radii of laser beam spots at distances D2 and D1, respectively. iv)The laser beam is extremely intense. The intensity of laser beam is expressed by number of photons coming out from the laser per second per unit area. It is about 1022 to 1034 photons /sec/sq cm Lasers are based on the concept of amplification of light by stimulated emission of radiation by matter. Einstein predicted this possibility of stimulated emission in 1917 but the first laser was built bt T.A.Maiman in 1960. To explain the working principle of a laser, let us consider the interaction of photons with atoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 the Quantum Theory of Light
    Chapter 4 The quantum theory of light In this chapter we study the quantum theory of interactions between light and matter. Historically the understanding how light is created and absorbed by atoms was central for development of quantum theory, starting with Planck’s revolutionary idea of energy quanta in the description of black body radiation. Today a more complete description is given by the theory of quantum electrodynamics (QED), which is a part of a more general relativistic quantum field theory (the standard model) that describe the physics of the elementary particles. Even so the the non- relativistic theory of photons and atoms has continued to be important, and has been developed further, in directions that are referred to as quantum optics. We will study here the basics of the non-relativistic description of interactions between photons and atoms, in particular with respect to the processes of spontaneous and stimulated emission. As a particular application we study a simple model of a laser as a source of coherent light. 4.1 Classical electromagnetism The Maxwell theory of electromagnetism is the basis for the classical as well as the quantum description of radiation. With some modifications due to gauge invariance and to the fact that this is a field theory (with an infinite number of degrees of freedom) the quantum theory can be derived from classical theory by the standard route of canonical quantization. In this approach the natural choice of generalized coordinates correspond to the field amplitudes. In this section we make a summary of the classical theory and show how a Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulation of electromagnetic fields interacting with point charges can be given.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Study of the Dynamics of Laser Lineshape and Linewidth M
    Vol. 130 (2016) ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA A No. 3 Numerical Study of the Dynamics of Laser Lineshape and Linewidth M. Eskef∗ Department of Physics, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria, P.O. Box 6091, Damascus, Syria (Received January 28, 2015; revised version May 31, 2016; in final form July 27, 2016) A rate equations model for lasers with homogeneously broadened gain is written and solved in both time and frequency domains. The model is applied to study the dynamics of laser lineshape and linewidth using the example of He–Ne laser oscillating at λ = 632:8 nm. Saturation of the frequency spectrum is found to take much longer time compared to the saturation time of the overall power. The saturated lineshape proves to be Lorentzian, whereas the unsaturated line profile is found to have a Gaussian peak and a Lorentzian tail. Above threshold, our numerical results for the linewidth are in good agreement with the Schawlow–Townes formula. Below threshold, however, the linewidth is found to have an upper limit defined by the spectral width of the pure cavity. Our model provides a unique and powerful tool for studying the dynamics of the frequency spectrum for different kinds of laser systems, and is also applicable for investigating lineshape and linewidth of pulsed lasers. DOI: 10.12693/APhysPolA.130.710 PACS/topics: 42.55.Ah, 42.55.Lt 1. Introduction give no information about the dynamics of lineshape and Laser lineshape and linewidth play a key role in the- linewidth. Second, their way of calculating lineshape and oretical studies related to the fields of resonance ion- linewidth leads through the implicit assumption that the ization spectroscopy (RIS) [1, 2], laser isotope separa- laser field can be represented by a complex amplitude tion [3], as well as resonance ionization mass spectrome- oscillating at the resonance frequency of the pure cav- try (RIMS) [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Stimulated Emission from a Single Excited Atom in a Waveguide
    week ending PRL 108, 143602 (2012) PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 6 APRIL 2012 Stimulated Emission from a Single Excited Atom in a Waveguide Eden Rephaeli1,* and Shanhui Fan2,† 1Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA 2Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA (Received 6 September 2011; published 3 April 2012) We study stimulated emission from an excited two-level atom coupled to a waveguide containing an incident single-photon pulse. We show that the strong photon correlation, as induced by the atom, plays a very important role in stimulated emission. Additionally, the temporal duration of the incident photon pulse is shown to have a marked effect on stimulated emission and atomic lifetime. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.143602 PACS numbers: 42.50.Ct, 42.50.Gy, 78.45.+h Introduction.—Stimulated emission, first formulated by In recent years, there has been much advancement in Einstein in 1917 [1], is the fundamental physical mecha- the capacity to deterministically generate single photons nism underlying the operation of lasers [2] and optical [25,26] and to control the shape of the single-photon pulse amplifiers [3,4], both of which are of paramount impor- [27,28]. In both waveguide and free space, a single photon, tance in modern technology. In recent years, stimulated by necessity, must exist as a pulse [29]. Therefore, our emission has been studied in a variety of novel systems, study of stimulated emission at the single-photon level including a surface plasmon nanosystem [5], a single mole- reveals important dynamic characteristics of stimulated cule transistor [6], and superconducting transmission lines emission.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamics of Radiation-Balanced Lasing
    Carl E. Mungan Vol. 20, No. 5/May 2003/J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1075 Thermodynamics of radiation-balanced lasing Carl E. Mungan Department of Physics, U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland 21402-5026 Received August 1, 2002; revised manuscript received December 20, 2002 Athermal lasers dispose of their waste heat in the form of spontaneous fluorescence (i.e., by laser cooling) to avoid warming the medium. The thermodynamics of this process is discussed both qualitatively and quanti- tatively from the point of view of the first and second laws. The steady-state optical dynamics of an ytterbium-doped KGd(WO4)2 fiber is analyzed as a model radiation-balanced solid-state laser. A Carnot ef- ficiency for all-optical amplification is derived in terms of the energy and entropy transported by the pump, fluorescence, and laser beams. This efficiency is compared with the performance of the model system. © 2003 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: 140.3320, 140.6810, 000.6850. 1. INTRODUCTION cooling that is due to the spontaneous emission against the Stokes heating from the stimulated emission. Laser cooling of a variety of condensed materials has been In the present paper the thermodynamics of this self- demonstrated experimentally within the past decade: cooled lasing mechanism is explored. First, a qualitative Yb3ϩ doped in heavy metal fluoride glasses1–3 such as overview of the admissibility and practicality of such a de- ZBLANP and in the crystals4,5 KGW and YAG, Tm3ϩ in vice from the point of view of the first and second laws of ZBLANP,6 ethanol solutions of the organic dyes7,8 thermodynamics is presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Simulation of Amplified Spontaneous Emission in Yb:YAG
    Numerical Simulation of Amplified Spontaneous Emission in Yb:YAG Thin-Disk Lasers Thesis submitted by Jonas Frederic Kruse in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Physics Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich 15. Mai 2019 Supervisor: Dr. Christian Vorholt 1 Dr. Thomas Nubbemeyer 2 Prof. Dr. Ferenc Krausz 2 Institute of Technical Physics German Aerospace Center Stuttgart, Germany 1Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co. KG 2Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich Numerische Simulation von verstarkter¨ Spontanemission in Yb:YAG Dunnscheibenlasern¨ Abschlussarbeit eingereicht von Jonas Frederic Kruse zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Master of Science in Physik Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat¨ Munchen¨ 15. Mai 2019 Betreuer: Dr. Christian Vorholt 1 Dr. Thomas Nubbemeyer 2 Prof. Dr. Ferenc Krausz 2 Institut fur¨ technische Physik Deutsches Zentrum fur¨ Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. Stuttgart, Deutschland 1Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co. KG 2Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat¨ Munchen¨ Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Theory 3 2.1 Active Medium . .3 2.2 Light Beams . .7 2.3 Thin-Disk Laser . .8 2.3.1 Rate Equation . .9 2.3.2 Nondimensional Rate Equations . 11 2.4 Heat Equation . 13 3 Implementation 15 3.1 Geometrical Grids . 16 3.2 Rate Equations . 18 3.2.1 Amplified Spontaneous Emission . 19 3.3 Heat Equation . 23 4 Numerical Simulations 25 4.1 Oscillator . 26 4.1.1 Transient Evolution . 32 4.1.2 Steady State . 41 4.1.3 Summary . 46 4.2 Amplifier . 48 4.2.1 Transient Evolution . 54 4.2.2 Steady State . 64 4.2.3 Summary . 68 5 Conclusion 71 I CONTENTS A Thin-Disk Laser A - 1 B Simulation Parameters B - 1 II Chapter 1 Introduction High-power lasers have a wide field of application, ranging from material processing [1, 2], to space debris removal [3–5] to the investigation of basic physics [6–8].
    [Show full text]
  • 4.4 Rate of Absorption and Stimulated Emission
    012334563789:9;<<= 4>18 4.4 Rate of Absorption and Stimulated Emission The rate of absorption induced by the field is π 2 2 w (ω) = E (ω) k ∈ˆ ⋅µ δ (ω −ω) (4.56) k 22 0 k The rate is clearly dependent on the strength of the field. The variable that you can most easily measure is the intensity I (energy flux through a unit area), which is the time-averaged value of the Poynting vector, S c S = (E× B) (4.57) 4π c c I = S = E2 = E2 (4.58) 4π 8π 0 Another representation of the amplitude of the field is the energy density I 1 U = = E2 (for a monochromatic field) (4.59) c 8π 0 Using this we can write 2 4π 2 w = U(ω) k ∈ˆ ⋅µ δ(ω − ω) (4.60) k 2 k 1 2 or for an isotropic field where E ⋅ xˆ = E ⋅ yˆ = E ⋅ zˆ = E 0 0 0 3 0 2 4π 2 w = U(ω) µ δ(ω − ω) (4.61) k 32 k k or more commonly w k = Bk U(ωk ) (4.62) 2 4π 2 B = µ Einstein B coefficient (4.63) k 32 k 4-19 2 2 (this is sometimes written as Bk = (2π 3 ) µk when the energy density is in ν). U can also be written in a quantum form, by writing it in terms of the number of photons N E2 ω3 Nω = 0 U = N (4.64) 8π π2c3 B is independent of the properties of the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Laser Amplifier Chapter 12 and 13 a Review of Quantum Mechanical Result of Emission and Absorption
    Laser amplifier Chapter 12 and 13 A review of quantum mechanical result of emission and absorption Symmetric relation between absorption and spontaneous emission. Spontaneous Absorption emission c c pab = σ (ν ) psp = σ (ν ) V V Stimulated emission c c pab = n σ (ν ) pst = n σ (ν ) V V Interaction of single mode light with a single atom Spontaneous emission: stimulated emission with zero incident photon In a cavity of volume V, the probability density or rate ( per second) of a (single atom ) spontaneous emission into a single mode is c p = σ (ν ) (1) sp V where σ(ν) is the transition cross section, which is a narrow line function centered at ν0. The probability of decay between t and t+∆t is psp∆t. The inverse of psp is the lifetime of the excited state emitting in a particular mode only. The actual lifetime of atomic system is much shorter because there are many modes to emit into. Absorption The probability density for the absorption of a photon from a given mode of frequency ν in a cavity of volume V is governed by the same rule c p = σ (ν ) (2) ab V If there are n photons present in one mode, the probability density that the atom absorbs one photon is n times larger or c p = n σ (ν ) (3) ab V Stimulated emission The probability of creation of photons when only one photon present is govern by the same cross section as (1) c p = σ (ν ) (4) st V If there are already n photons in a mode, the probability of emitting one more photon is c p = n σ (ν ) (5) ab V Thus the pst is the same as pab, the probability for spontaneous and stimulated emission of one photon is the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Spontaneous and Stimulated Transitions 1
    CHAPTER ONE Spontaneous and Stimulated Transitions 1 Spontaneous and Stimulated Transitions 1.1 Introduction A laser is an oscillator that operates at very high frequencies. These op- tical frequencies range to values several orders of magnitude higher than can be achieved by the “conventional” approaches of solid-state elec- tronics or electron tube technology. In common with electronic circuit oscillators, a laser is constructed from an amplifier with an appropri- ate amount of positive feedback. The acronym LASER, which stands for light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation, is in reality therefore a slight misnomer†. In this chapter we shall consider the fundamental processes whereby amplification at optical frequencies can be obtained. These processes involvethefundamentalatomicnatureofmatter.Attheatomiclevel matter is not a continuum, it is composed of discrete particles — atoms, molecules or ions. These particles have energies that can have only certain discrete values. This discreteness or quantization,ofenergyis intimately connected with the duality that exists in nature. Light some- times behaves as if it were a wave and in other circumstances it behaves as if it were composed of particles. These particles, called photons, carry the discrete packets of energy associated with the wave. For light of fre- quency ν the energy of each photon is hν,whereh is Planck’s constant 34 —6.6 10− J s. The energy hν is the quantum of energy associated × † The more truthful acronym LOSER was long ago deemed inappropriate. Why ‘Quantum’ Electronics? 3 Fig. 1.1. with the frequency ν. At the microscopic level the amplification of light within a laser involves the emission of these quanta.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 33 — Spontaneous and Stimulated Absorption and Emission — April 5, 1999
    Lecture 33 — Spontaneous and Stimulated Absorption and Emission — April 5, 1999 Physics 221 — Lecture 33 — “Atomic Absorption and Light Emission” April 5, 1999 Reading Meyer-Arendt, Chapter 23; Young, Ch. 8; Hecht, Ch. 13. Problems Ch. 23, Problems 1, 2. Homework problem at end of notes. Reminder Physics Colloquium today, Sergei Savikhin (Iowa State), “Studies of Photoelectron Transfer using Ultrafast Laser Spectroscopy,” 4:00 in 4327 Stevenson 1. Basic concepts of spontaneous and stimulated emission. So now we have finally assembled almost all the “software” we need to describe the operation of the laser, the first important quantum optics device. a. The Planck distribution function for quantized atomic oscillators. b. The Boltzmann distribution of energy in atomic energy levels. c. Today we will work through the concepts of spontaneous and stimulated emission, first propounded by Einstein in 1916-1917: i. Spontaneous emission is just like radioactive decay, with less energetic byproducts: an atom in an excited state has a finite probability of decay per unit time, a decay probability characteristic of each atomic state. ii. Stimulated absorption occurs when a photon strikes an atom with just exactly the proper energy to induce an electronic transition between two energy states. iii. Einstein’s contribution was to show that there was a third process, stimulated emission, which could cause a downward electronic transition from an excited electronic state in response to a photon of just the same energy needed for stimulated absorption. d. In this lecture, we will start out by looking at spontaneous emission, then at stimulated absorption, and then, by combining these two, arrive at the Ein- stein coefficients for stimulated vs spontaneous emission probabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 a Radiative Cycle with Stimulated Emission from Atoms (Ions)
    1 A Radiative Cycle with Stimulated Emission from Atoms (Ions) in an Astrophysical Plasma. S. Johansson1 and V.S Letokhov2,1 1Lund Observatory, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, 221 00 Lund, Sweden 2Institute of Spectroscopy of Russian Academy of Sciences, 142190 Troitsk, Russia We propose that a radiative cycle operates in atoms (ions) located in a rarefied gas in the vicinity of a hot star. Besides spontaneous transitions the cycle includes a stimulated transition in one very weak intermediate channel. This radiative “bottle neck” creates a population inversion, which for an appropriate column density results in amplification and stimulated radiation in the weak transition. The stimulated emission opens a fast decay channel leading to a fast radiative cycle in the atom (or ion). We apply this model by explaining two unusually bright Fe II lines at 250.7 and 250.9 nm in the UV spectrum of gas blobs close to η Carinae, one of the most massive and luminous stars in the Galaxy. The gas blobs are spatially resolved from the central star by the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). We also suggest that in the frame of a radiative cycle stimulated emission is a key phenomenon behind many spectral lines showing anomalous intensities in spectra of gas blobs outside eruptive stars. PACS numbers: 95.75.Fg; 95.85.Jq; 98.38.Gt; 98.58.Bz. Radiative processes play a key role in atomic astrophysics as stellar radiation controls the primary activity in the immediate surroundings of a star. Radiative mechanisms in low-density, non-equilibrium astrophysical plasmas manifest themselves in the spectrum by the appearance of unusually bright, sometimes time-variable, emission lines [1].
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Laser Physics - Basics
    2. Laser physics - basics Spontaneous and stimulated processes Einstein A and B coefficients Rate equation analysis Gain saturation What is a laser? LASER: Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation "light" could mean anything from microwaves to x-rays Essential elements: 1. A laser medium - a collection of atoms, molecules, etc. 2. A pumping process - puts energy into the laser medium 3. Optical feedback - provides a mechanism for the light to interact (possibly many times) with the laser medium The two-level atom Quantum energy levels excited state ground state Absorption: promotes an electron from the ground to the excited state Emission: drops the electron back to the ground state "spontaneous emission" - the decay of an excited state to the ground state with the corresponding emission of a photon Conservation of energy: Eexcited -Eground = Ephoton Three things can occur Absorption •Promotes molecule to a higher energy state •Decreases the number of photons Spontaneous Emission •Molecule drops from a high energy state to a lower state •Increases the number of photons •This is the only one that does NOT require a photon in the initial state Stimulated Emission •Molecule drops from a high energy state to a lower state •The presence of one photon stimulates the emission of a second one Relaxation of the two-level atom An atom in the excited state can relax to the ground state by: . spontaneous emission: rate is rad . any of a variety of non-radiative pathways: rate = nr All of these processes are single-atom processes; each atom acts independently of all the others.
    [Show full text]