DOCSLIB.ORG

Review-The-London-Cage.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review-The-London-Cage.Pdf Intelligence in Public Media The London Cage: The Secret History of Britain’s WWII Interrogation Centre Helen Fry (Yale University Press, 2017), 244 pp., photographs, notes, bibliography, index. Reviewed by J. R. Seeger In 1929, the great powers of Europe met in Geneva 1939 and the 1940 German invasion of Holland, Belgium, to address issues related to handling both prisoners and and France that it became clear this conflict was unlike civilians during any future war. The Geneva Convention, any other. It is no exaggeration to state that by the fall of officially titledThe Convention Relative to the Treatment 1940, the British government and people felt they were of Prisoners of War, had 97 articles addressing every facing an existential threat from the Nazi war machine. aspect of the treatment of captured warfighters, as well as civilians, in areas occupied by a hostile military force. Further, while the full scope of the Nazi genocide The destructive power unleashed during World War I— against Jewish and other ethnic and religious groups in the first modern war—surpassed the imagination of Germany proper and the areas Germany occupied were leaders on all sides of the conflict. Still, in 1929, Europe- not immediately evident, it was clear by 1940 that the an and US leaders had an almost chivalrous image of how Nazi regime was not abiding by the Geneva Convention the victorious should (and would) treat prisoners of war, with regard to civilians. In July 1942, Field Marshal best characterized in Article 5 of the convention, which Gerd von Rundstedt issued an order instructing all Allied states, parachutists to be turned over immediately to the Gestapo for interrogation and subsequent execution. In October Every prisoner of war is required to declare, if he is 1942, the Nazi regime underscored their noncompliance interrogated on the subject, his true names and rank, with the Geneva Convention through a formal document or his regimental number. If he infringes this rule, he known as Kommandobefehl, or “Commando order,” exposes himself to a restriction of privileges accorded issued by Adolf Hitler. This order stated categorically to prisoners of his category. No pressure shall be ex- that any time German forces captured “commandos” (i.e., ercised on prisoners to obtain information regarding special operations forces) regardless of whether they the situation in their armed forces or their country. were in uniform, they were to be summarily executed; it Prisoners who refuse to reply may not be threatened, also specified that any intelligence agents, saboteurs, or insulted, or exposed to unpleasantness or disadvan- resistance forces not in uniform who were captured by the tages of any kind whatsoever . .a German military were to be turned over to the German Security Service (Sicherheitsdienst, or SD) for interroga- At the beginning of World War II, all of the European tion and execution. nations involved in the conflict and the United States were signatories to this convention, though the Soviet Union This is the historical context for Dr. Helen Fry’s book, did not ratify the agreement and was therefore not obliged The London Cage. While the word “cage” in the title to follow it. When the conflict began, theoretically, the may sound barbaric, “cage” was the term the British used rights of prisoners of war (POWs) as well as those of for the 12 POW camps in Britain that controlled pris- non-combatant civilians were protected under internation- oners and conducted interrogations. In addition to these al law. What the Geneva Convention did not address (and locations, which were managed by a UK Army military likely the signatories could not imagine at the time) was intelligence unit known as MI19 (eventually renamed how complete and destructive “total war” would become MI119), the British Security Service (MI5) maintained by 1939. Europe witnessed a prelude to total war during a separate facility—“Camp XX”—that focused on the the Spanish Civil War with the destruction of whole cit- interrogation of German intelligence agents captured after ies, but it was not until the German invasion of Poland in infiltrating into Britain. Battlefield POW facilities were also known colloquially as “cages.” The London Cage was the location for interrogation of prisoners thought to a. Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. Gene- va, 27 July 1929, Part II, Article 5; available online at http://www. have important intelligence, including captured spies and/ icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/misc/57jnws.htm. or POWs who were noncompliant with POW regulations All statements of fact, opinion, or analysis expressed in this article are those of the author. Nothing in the article should be con- strued as asserting or implying US government endorsement of its factual statements and interpretations. Studies in Intelligence Vol 62, No. 1 (Extracts, March 2018) 37 The London Cage in other camps. Dr. Fry states that her review of war office poison gas and its use in Nazi concentration camps. While records reveals that, from 1940 to 1946, approximately intelligence reporting on tactical and operational material 3,000 German prisoners passed through the London Cage was certainly critical to the Allied commanders in the for interrogation. field, these strategic intelligence reports had significant impact both during the war as well as during the post- The London Cage was located in No. 8 and No. 9, war trials at Nuremberg. At the end of the war, when the Kensington Palace Gardens. The gardens were royal prop- London Cage transitioned from intelligence collection erty behind Kensington Palace where late-19th century to a focus on investigating war crimes, the skills of the mansions were built on grounds leased by the Crown to interrogators—especially Scotland’s—were at their peak. wealthy members of the nobility. By 1940, some of these From October 1945 to September 1948, interrogators at properties had been abandoned and/or run down due to the London Cage handled 3,573 German military POWs the loss of family fortunes or the tragic ends of family and Nazi civilians, including commandants of the con- lines due to the casualties of World War I. In October centration camps, senior Wehrmacht commanders, Field 1940, the British military assumed control of these aban- Marshal Albert Kesselring, and the aforementioned von doned properties and created the “London Cage.” To run Rundstedt. (123) The work of these interrogators was the facility, the military called back to service a WWI used in 15 separate trials at Nuremberg. veteran British intelligence officer, 60-year-old Lt. Col. A. P. Scotland. Scotland had served as a British Army But Dr. Fry raises the question, “At what cost?” In the interrogator for the military intelligence in World War I, case of the London Cage, she was able to uncover very was fluent in German, and had actually served in a reserve little hard evidence that interrogators at the facility ever capacity with the German army in the German colony of abused prisoners, beyond the basic manhandling that was SW Africa at the turn of the century. In his memoir, also not uncommon treatment of enlisted Allied soldiers at the entitled The London Cage (Evans Brothers, 1957), Scot- time. This lack of evidence may be in part because reve- land describes his time as a German soldier in Africa and latory information in the British archives is still classified, his work in Africa as an informant for British intelligence. or because it was long ago lost to the elements. Yet the lack of evidence may be because cases of abuse were, Fry establishes that without Scotland’s skill and in reality, simply few and far between. Dr. Fry points to experience the London Cage would never have become a Scotland’s memoirs (which were classified for years), in productive intelligence collection facility: Scotland was which he denies any significant abuse of prisoners in the an experienced interrogator, he was fluent in German, and London Cage. But in her search for evidence of abuse, Dr. was thoroughly familiar with German culture—including Fry did unearth sufficient anecdotal evidence to support German military culture. Scotland managed the London her own view that the London Cage interrogators did, Cage but also served as an advisor to other facilities. He in some cases, probably violate the Geneva Convention designed training courses for other interrogators—contri- rules for prisoners and the War Ministry’s official guide- butions that led to the creation of an industrial-scale intel- lines. That said, her research into British Army and War ligence collection program across 12 facilities in Britain, Ministry investigations did not reveal any proven cases of as well as numerous initial detention and interrogation abuse in the London Cage. facilities closer to the battlefield. The London Cage is most useful in the way it details Early in the book, Fry writes, Scotland’s papers and the War Office records that reflect Scotland’s description of what it takes to be a successful It was largely due to Colonel Scotland’s expertise that interrogator—fluency in the language of the target, a first- by the end of the Second World War, British intelli- class memory, keen observation skills, infinite patience, gence had an impressive and adaptable interrogation knowledge of psychology, and the ability to act quickly policy that produced intelligence of the highest quali- on the previous four skills. To these, Scotland added his ty, unequaled in any country . (35) personal knowledge of how the German military treated As an example of the types of intelligence acquired at its own soldiers, sailors, and airmen and how officers and the London Cage, Dr. Fry points to the 1942 interroga- non-commissioned officers delivered orders and expected tions of prisoners captured in North Africa, which detailed obedience.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Role of Culture in Interrogation and Questioning in the Second World War
    DOSSIER War and Post-War Periods in Late Modern Europe Close Encounters: the role of culture in interrogation and questioning in the Second World War Simona TOBIA University College London Lyman B. Kirkpatrick spent the Second World War in the American intelligence, working for G-2 and for the Office of Strategic Services (OSS). After the war he served in the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and became executive director in 1961. He was also a prolific writer and in 1961 he wrote for the CIA a report titled “Combat Intelligence: a comparative report” which focused on WWII and had the purpose to: “obtain first-hand judgments from intelligence officers at all levels about what methods of intelligence collection had proved most valuable in combat”. Unlike us historians, he was able to access sources only available to a CIA officer, including classified documents, visits to G-2 sections of all the armies that had served in the war to conduct interviews and submit questionnaires, and he found that By far the most profitable source of intelligence for all levels of the command – division, corps, and army – was prisoners of war. Some units estimated that as high as 90 per cent of their useful information came from prisoner interrogation. The corps calculated that from 33 to 50 per cent of all the information they received was provided by the interrogators in the prisoner-of-war cages1. Historians studying intelligence in the Second World War have traditionally 69 focused on signals intelligence (SIGINT): the impact of programs such as ULTRA, institutions such as the British Government Code and Cypher School at Bletchley Park and devices such as the Enigma machine in breaking encrypted enemy communications are well known by the public beyond academic circles, and so are the networks of spies and the famous ‘double-cross system’.
    [Show full text]
  • Military History
    Save up to 80% off cover prices on these subjects: Air Combat & Aircraft ···················45 Military Modeling·······················68 American Military History··················8 Naval History ·························59 American Revolution ····················10 Notable Military Units····················57 British Military History ···················67 Spies & Espionage ·····················65 Civil War ·····························12 Uniforms, Markings & Insignia ·············56 Cold War ····························66 Vietnam War ··························15 European Warfare ······················67 WW I & WW II Battles & Campaigns ·········34 Fortresses & Castles ····················59 WW I & WW II Commanders & Units ········39 General Military History ···················2 WW I & WW II Diaries & Memoirs···········30 History of Warfare······················63 WW I & WW II Naval History ··············41 Hitler & the Nazis·······················26 WW I & WW II Spies & Espionage ··········44 Holocaust ····························29 War on Terror ·························67 Korean War···························15 Wartime Journalism ····················64 Military Collectibles ·····················68 Weapons & Military Technology ············58 Military Leaders························69 World War I & World War II ···············18 Current titles are marked with a «. 3891682 SWORD TECHNIQUES OF MUSASHI AND THE OTHER SAMURAI General Military History MASTERS. By Fumon Tanaka. An internationally LIMITED QUANTITY 4724720 SILENT AND renowned
    [Show full text]
  • The Secret Listeners
    The Secret Listeners The Secret Listeners Pascal Theatre Company The Secret Listeners Edited by Julia Pascal and Thomas Kampe Pascal Theatre Company ‘The project set out to investigate little Edited by Julia Pascal and Thomas Kampe known events that happened during World War II at the large mansion house in Trent Park ..... What was the particular history that had been hidden for so long?’ ‘A site-specific investigation, a series of interviews with refugees and locals, a learning process and training for volunteers, a film, a public discussion, a new research document, a website, a book and much more.’ Julia Pascal ‘The performance event central to this heritage educational project was conceived as a site-responsive tour, as a promenade-like immersive experience for the spectators as active, emancipated participants.’ Thomas Kampe The Secret Listeners Pascal Theatre Company Edited by Julia Pascal and Thomas Kampe A Brief History 7 Julia Pascal From Black Box to Open House 11 What is Political Theatre? Julia Pascal Listening as Learning 21 Thomas Kampe An Emerging Vision: Secret Listeners 23 Working Methods Thomas Kampe Partnerships 41 The Wiener Library and The Jewish Military Museum Research and Future Questions 45 Sally Mijit ATrentParkHistory 67 Melvyn Keen Reflections 73 Jonathan Meth, Mark Norfolk, Del Taylor, Susannah Kraft Levene, Wayne McGee and Lesley Lightfoot Credits 86 Julia Pascal ABriefHistory This book gives an insight into a heritage arts educational project undertaken in 2012-2013 by Pascal Theatre Company. The Secret Listeners was made possible by a grant from the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF). The project set out to investigate little known events that happened during World War II at the large mansion house in Trent Park, and from that exploration, several strands of educational work, which ran parallel to different activities during 2012 and 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Helen Fry. the London Cage: the Secret History of Britain's World War II Interrogation Centre
    This is a repository copy of Helen Fry. The London Cage: The Secret History of Britain's World War II Interrogation Centre. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/144147/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Moore, B. (2018) Helen Fry. The London Cage: The Secret History of Britain's World War II Interrogation Centre. Journal of British Studies, 57 (3). pp. 650-651. ISSN 0021-9371 https://doi.org/10.1017/jbr.2018.63 This article has been published in a revised form in Journal of British Studies [https://doi.org/10.1017/jbr.2018.63]. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © The North American Conference on British Studies 2018. Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. This licence only allows you to download this work and share it with others as long as you credit the authors, but you can’t change the article in any way or use it commercially. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Helen Fry, The London Cage. The Secret H Bs World War II Interrogation Centre New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2017) HB pp.
    [Show full text]
  • I) Enhanced Interrogation (Torture
    Secret Intelligence Service Room No. 15 Notes (I) Enhanced Interrogation (Torture) (C-IV) 28012017CIVR15tyxz Position : Overcome with intelligence, NOT via appeal to bestiality Table of Interrogation Techniques Apparently Recommended/Approved by U.S. Officials OK’d by Haynes Status Proposed Legal Approved Approved Proposed Approved 11/27/02; after by per by by Technique Category by Phifer by Hill Approved Rumsfeld’s Working Beaver Dunlavey Rumsfeld 10/11/02 10/25/02 by 1/15/03 Group 10/11/02 10/11/02 4/16/03 Rumsfeld Order 4/4/03 12/02/02 Direct, straightforward — — — — — — — Yes Yes questions Approved for Yelling at detainee I Yes Yes Yes Yes OK Yes Yes discretionary use Approved Deception: multiple for I Yes Yes Yes Yes OK Yes Yes interrogators discretionary use Deception: Approved Interrogator is from for country with discretionary reputation for I Yes Yes Yes Yes use OK Yes Yes harsh treatment of detainees; “False Flag” Incentive or removal of — — — — — — — Yes Yes, incentive Playing on a detainee’s love for — — — — — — — Yes Yes a particular group Playing on a detainee’s hate for — — — — — — — Yes Yes a particular group Significantly/ or moderately — — — — — — — Yes Yes increasing fear level of detainee Reducing fear level — — — — — — — Yes Yes of detainee Boosting the ego of — — — — — — — Yes Yes detainee Insulting the ego of detainee, not beyond the limits — — — — — — — Yes Yes that would apply to a POW Invoking feelings of — — — — — — — Yes Yes futility in detainee Convincing detainee — — — — — — — Yes Yes interrogator knows all
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Culture in Interrogation and Questioning in the Second World War Simona Tobia
    Close encounters: the role of culture in interrogation and questioning in the Second World War Simona Tobia To cite this version: Simona Tobia. Close encounters: the role of culture in interrogation and questioning in the Second World War. Rúbrica Contemporánea, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 2015, WAR AND POST- WAR PERIODS IN LATE MODERN EUROPE, 4 (8), pp.69-81. 10.5565. hal-02436543 HAL Id: hal-02436543 https://hal-univ-pau.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02436543 Submitted on 13 Jan 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. DOSSIER War and Post-War Periods in Late Modern Europe Close Encounters: the role of culture in interrogation and questioning in the Second World War Simona TOBIA University College London Lyman B. Kirkpatrick spent the Second World War in the American intelligence, working for G-2 and for the Office of Strategic Services (OSS). After the war he served in the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and became executive director in 1961. He was also a prolific writer and in 1961 he wrote for the CIA a report titled “Combat Intelligence: a comparative report” which focused on WWII and had the purpose to: “obtain first-hand judgments from intelligence officers at all levels about what methods of intelligence collection had proved most valuable in combat”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Double Cross System and MI-5'S Supremacy in World War II
    “A Game of Human Chess”: The Double Cross System and MI-5’s Supremacy in World War II By Adamya Sharma History Departmental Undergraduate Honors Thesis University of Colorado at Boulder April 7, 2015 Thesis Advisor: Dr. Thomas Zeiler Department of History and International Affairs Defense Committee: Dr. Fred Anderson Department of History Dr. Thomas Metcalf Department of Philosophy Abstract World War II featured monumental battles, such as the Normandy invasions, the Battle of the Bulge, Stalingrad, Iwo Jima, El Alamein, and Kursk. While historical scholarship of the World War II generally focuses on the war’s grand military engagements, it is imperative to note that Allied and Axis intelligence units battled for supremacy in a war of deception. The Double Cross system employed by the British military intelligence division (MI-5) was, virtually from the war’s onset, successful in overwhelming its German opponent, the Abwehr by turning its agents into supportive double agents. Traditional historiography follows the classic spy narrative and credits the success of MI-5 to its daring agents, brilliant creators, or stalwart handlers who used wit and guile to deceive their German adversary. In this thesis I will argue that the success of the Double Cross system should be attributed to more than solely the actions of the Double Cross team. Though the operatives played an invaluable role, the existence of an overriding, well-structured system determined their success. By examining the uniqueness of the Double Cross system, this thesis will seek to illustrate that the victorious outcome of the British in the intelligence war was due to their tireless effort to perfect a system of counterespionage.
    [Show full text]
  • Blunder How the US Gave Away Nazi Supersecrets to Russia.Pdf
    In May 1945, as the Iron Curtain was about to be rung down across Europe, there occurred one of the worst blunders of World War II, a blunder still little understood. It involved the passing of certain extraordinary secret informa- tion from the Americans to the Russians. The incident had begun when Hitler, anticipating a "Greater-Greater Reich," recruited Nazi Germany's top scientists for the development of a technocracy far in advance of anything that the rest of the world had conceived. To oversee this crucial project, he promoted as his most trusted aide SS General Hans Kammler. Then, with the unexpected swift advance of the U.S. Army, certain of these Nazi supersecrets were suddenly in the possession of the Americans. With equal swiftness, this wealth of technological information was passed by the Americans, unaware of its significance, to the Red Army. These secrets provided the Soviets an invaluable boost to their still-trailing military research. The extent of the advantage that this knowledge gave to the Reds has not been completely evaluated. Meanwhile, Washington has resolutely suppressed all attempts to probe the story for its embarrassing truth. The mysteries clouding this blunder were compounded by the simultaneous disappearance, on the eve of Hitler's suicide, of the powerful General Kammler, whose fate remains a source of speculation. In this revealing book, a distinguished correspondent, who is familiar with the scene and the participants, explores the stories behind one of World War II's most closely guarded secrets. Tom Agoston, a veteran British correspondent, is a specialist on Germany and spent more than a decade as Chief of Bureau and diplomatic correspondent in Bonn for the International News Service (INS) for America.
    [Show full text]
  • London Cage 1St Edition Free Download
    FREE LONDON CAGE 1ST EDITION PDF Helen Fry | 9780300231229 | | | | | The secrets of the London Cage | UK news | The Guardian Published by Evans Brothers Limited Seller Rating:. About this Item: Evans Brothers Limited, Condition: Good. First Edition. Blue dust jacket with yellow lettering over blue cloth. London Cage 1st edition pages. Notable foxing and tanning to endpapers and page edges. Mild wear to spine, board edges and corners, with scuffing and soiling to boards. Unclipped dust jacket London Cage 1st edition plastic cover. Mild wear, tear and loss to edges and corners. Moderate tanning, staining and soiling to DJ. Seller Inventory GEO. More information about this seller Contact this seller 1. Published by Evans Bros, London About this Item: Evans Bros, London, Condition: Very Good. Dust Jacket Condition: Good. First edition, pp, illustrated,bound in black cloth with rubbed and creased dustwrapper in protective cover; Large Octavo. Seller Inventory More information about this seller Contact this seller 2. Published by Evans, Lon. About this Item: Evans, Lon. Dust Jacket Condition: Very Good. More information about this seller Contact this seller 3. Published by Evans Brothers Ltd About this Item: Evans Brothers Ltd, Condition: Fair. London Cage 1st edition edition and not a later reprint. Early limited account of how Col. Scotland, who amazingly had served in the Imperial German Army before serving London Cage 1st edition the British Army, had obtained intelligence from captured German senior officers incl. Kesselring and others. A parallel to how captured German spies were treated at Camp at Letchmere House and were then 'turned' to spy for the Allies.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the M Room: Secret Listeners Who Bugged the Nazis in WW2, by Helen Fry, Agent
    The M Room: Secret Listeners who Bugged the Nazis in WW2, by Helen Fry, Agent: Steph Ebdon The Marsh Agency Ltd., London, 2012. 288 pp. (Available through Amazon £12.15.) The story of CSDIC (Combined Services Detailed Interrogation Centre) (UK) has been told, in part, on ITV’s Britain’s Secret Homes with Sir David Jason revealing how British Intelligence bugged the conversations of senior Nazi POWs for the duration of the war. British Intelligence held 59 German generals at Trent Park near Cockfosters in North London, who paraded – one could fairly say “strutted” - around the house for up to three years, inadvertently giving away some of Hitler’s Germany’s most closely guarded secrets. It was one of the most valuable sources of intelligence on flying bombs (V1s) German rocketry (V2s), jet-propelled aircraft and submarine warfare. At Latimer House and Wilton Park, both in Buckinghamshire, lower-rank prisoners and officers were held in cells beneath the house. The secret listeners also tuned into the bugged cells from the ‘M Room’ at these sites. This project, originally part of MI9 became independent as MI19.1 These three stately homes, deep in the heart of the English countryside, were equipped with the latest and most advanced listening equipment. The “listeners”, working in the specially equipped M Room were connected by the latest and most sophisticated recording equipment to bugging devices in the prisoners cells (in reality comfortable rooms, and for senior generals, even suites) where microphones were hidden: in the light fittings, the fireplaces, behind mirrors, in plants and even in trees in the grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Cage: the Secret History of Britain's World War II
    2018-072 27 August 2018 The London Cage: The Secret History of Britain’s World War II Interrogation Centre by Helen Fry . New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 2017. Pp. ix, 244. ISBN 978–0–300–22193–0. Review by Carl Cavanagh Hodge, The University of British Columbia ([email protected]). Historian and biographer Helen Fry 1 observes that “the reputation of the London Cage will en- dure—and not for the justice that it secured against the evil Nazi perpetrators of mass murder. The rumors surrounding it will forever cast a shadow on British intelligence” (221). In the present book, she illuminates the darker corners behind the Victorian façades of Nos. 6, 7, 8, and 8a of Kensington Palace Garden during and immediately after World War II. The official files of the London Cage were not released to the National Archives until the 1990s, except for missing files (suspiciously) said to have been lost to asbestos contamination and floodwater damage. The London Cage comprises sixteen chapters and an epilogue, enhanced by photographs and illustrations of the facility, prisoners, interrogators, and notable staff members. The story extends from the desperate phase of Britain’s early war years through to the postwar efforts to extract in- formation relevant to the prosecution of German war criminals. The central figure at the Cage, one of nine POW interrogation facilities, was Col. Alexander Scotland, who set the rules and methods for the work done there. Scotland’s memoirs (sanitized by MI5) were published in 1957, but, as Fry notes, even the declassified, unredacted manuscript shows that Scotland withheld details of the treatment of German POWs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Drugs Don't Work : Intelligence, Torture and the London Cage, 1940–8
    The drugs don’t work : intelligence, torture and the London Cage, 1940–8 Lomas, DWB http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2018.1478629 Title The drugs don’t work : intelligence, torture and the London Cage, 1940–8 Authors Lomas, DWB Type Article URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/47215/ Published Date 2018 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. Review Article The Drugs Don’t Work: Intelligence, Torture and the London Cage Dan Lomas Helen Fry, The London Cage: The Secret History of Britain’s World War II Interrogation Centre, New Haven and London: Yale University Press (2017), pp. 256, Hbk, £18.99, ISBN: ISBN: 9780300221930. Prisoner of war interrogation has always been an important source of intelligence.1 In Britain, it is a topic that has often met with controversy. Wartime interrogations at MI5’s Camp 020, colonial abuses during the Mau Mau uprising and Aden campaigns, the so-called ‘Five Techniques’ in Northern Ireland and military interrogations in Iraq and Afghanistan, have all provoked claims of ill-treatment. The growing controversy around the ethics of interrogation and allegations of torture have led to a welcome growth in the literature, moving the subject beyond the niche it once was, even if some is often prone to hyperbole.2 Helen Fry’s new account of the secretive London District Cage interrogation facility, housed in buildings off Kensington Palace Gardens, located in central London, is the latest book to shed light on the subject.
    [Show full text]