AGENDA Indian Trail Town Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, April 25

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AGENDA Indian Trail Town Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, April 25 MAYOR TOWN COUNCIL Michael L Alvarez Gordon B. Daniels MAYOR PRO TEM Gary M. Savoie David L. Cohn Shirley Howe TOWN MANAGER Jim Wojtowicz, Interim Town Mark A. Wireman Manager Indian Trail Town Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, April 25, 2017 Civic Building—6:30 PM AGENDA 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. MOMENT OF SILENCE 3. AGENDA ADDITIONS & DELETIONS Action 4. MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA Action 5. PRESENTATIONS a) Transportation Capital Improvement Projects (CM Savoie & Mr. Sadek) b) Poplin Road / Bonterra Blvd. Proposed Circle (Mayor Pro Tem Cohn & Mr. Sadek) c) Presentation on Marcy’s Law for Victim’s Rights (Justin Rice & Mayor Alvarez) 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS 7. LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE 8. CONSENT AGENDA Action a) Month End Tax Report – March 2017 b) Approval of Recommended Streets for FY17-18 Resurfacing Contract c) Adoption of Annadale Subdivision Streets to Town-Maintained Roadways d) Hawfield Road MOU- Heritage Subdivision (Assuming a small section of Wesley Chapel Road for maintenance.) e) Voluntary Annexation #146 (CZ-2016-009 Steepleton) i. Approval of Certificate of Sufficiency ii. Approval of Resolution Fixing Public Hearing Date f) Adoption of Supplemental Resolution regarding Records Retention and Disposition Schedule g) Adoption of Resolution to Celebrate Arbor Day on April 22, 2017 h) Adoption of Proclamation – Marcy’s Law i) Adoption Ordinance enacting a Code of Ordinances for the Town of Indian Trail (Allows for Revising, Amending, Restating, Codifying and Compiling Certain Existing General Ordinances dealing with subjects embraced in such Code of Ordinances). 1 j) Adoption of June 13, 2016 Regular Meetings Minutes k) Adoption of June 28, 2016 Regular Meetings Minutes 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS None Action 10. OLD BUSINESS a) US Hwy. 74 Multi-use Trail funds to Chestnut Parkway (Mr. Sadek) b) Storm Drainage Project – Cottage Creek Rd. – Traewyck Subdivision (Mr. Sadek) c) Sardis Church Rd & Unionville-Indian Trail Road Round-about (Mr. Sadek) d) Solid Waste Contact Award – (Mr. Burhans) i. Indian Trail Solid Waste Contract - GBUSA Waste Connections ii. Indian Trail Solid Waste Contract - /Waste Pro 11. NEW BUSINESS Action a) Consideration to Repeal the current Public Information Request Policy and reinstate the previous policy (CM Daniels) i. Policy Adopted 11-9-11 ii. Policy Adopted 9-27-16 b) Consideration to give direction to the Interim Town Manager to not have a tax increase in FY17-18 Budget (CM Daniels) c) Appointment of Town Council MPO (CRTPO) Delegate (CM Daniels) Action 12. DISCUSSION ITEMS a) How to honor past, current and future Town Council members in the new Town Hall (CM Daniels) 13. CLOSED SESSION 14. UPDATES a) Manager’s Update: Jim Wojtowicz, Interim Town Manager 15. COUNCIL COMMENTS 16. ADJOURN Action 2 Town of Indian Trail Memo TO: Mayor and Town Council FROM: Alicia Massey CC: Jim Wojtowicz DATE: April 25, 2017 SUBJECT: Month End March 2017 According to GS 105-350(7) it is the duty of the tax collector to submit to the governing body at each of its regular meetings a report of the amount he/she has collected on each year’s taxes with which he is charged, the amount remaining uncollected, and the steps he/she is taking to encourage or enforce payment of uncollected taxes. Attached is the month end report for March 2017 collections. The tax department is using all collection remedies as provided by general statute to collect delinquent taxes including but not limited to garnishments, attachments and NC Debt Setoff. Percent Collected through 4/17/2017: 99.33% PO Box 2430 • 130 Blythe Drive • Indian Trail • North Carolina • 28079 • (704) 821-5401• Fax (704) 821-9045 April 17, 2017 TOWN OF INDIAN TRAIL Page No: 7 04:00 PM Property Tax Transaction Inquiry Totals Page -------------------------- Principal ------------------------- Description Count Arrears/Other 2016 2017 Future Penalty Total Changes 54126 Billing 33024 2,355.29 7,398,640.08 0.00 0.00 7,400,995.37 Deductions 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Payments 31725 90,991.86- 7,349,634.97- 0.00 0.00 9,919.63- 7,450,546.46- Reversals 29 10.18 9,137.86 0.00 0.00 76.58 9,224.62 Adjustments 2237 62.14 3,489.59- 0.00 0.00 2,277.23- 5,704.68- Apply Over 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Rev Appl Ovr 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ref Overpay 152 47,501.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47,501.00 Cncl Overpay 32 7.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.90 Penalty 20420 14,056.77 14,056.77 Totals 141745 41,055.35- 54,653.38 0.00 0.00 1,936.49 15,534.52 Town of Indian Trail Memo TO: Mayor and Town Council FROM: Patrick Sadek, P.E. Director of Development Services Division DATE: 04/14/2017 SUBJECT: Recommended FY 16-17 Street Resurfacing List General Information: The proposed FY 16-17 Street Resurfacing Contract will provide asphalt repair and resurfacing to proposed list below. This contract will be advertised according to North Carolina G.S. 143-129 and awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Recommendation: The following is a list of streets recommended for resurfacing in FY 16-17: 1. Grover Moore 1378 22. Treeside 336 2. Shumard 1698 23. Fripp 1278 3. Shortcut 443 24. Waters Reach 590 4. Courtfield 861 25. Spring Fancy 411 5. Maple Leaf 705 26. Blackfoot 344 6. Beacon Hills 160 27. Pine Lake 696 7. Harvest Red 424 28. Sandbox 530 8. Kennerly 1780 29. Braxton 399 9. Spring Fancy 710 30. Second 1546 10. Harvest Red 375 31. Corrona 748 11. Crowell 455 32. Briarmore 338 12. Spanish Moss 1567 33. French Scout 275 13. Arrow 544 34. Brook Valley 868 14. Council Fire 1081 35. Colton Ridge 735 15. Bradberry 149 36. Sunnyside 430 16. Elmsworth 203 37. Aringill 363 17. Revelwood 859 38. Aylesbury 350 18. Arrow 442 39. Foster 255 19. Cadberry 483 40. Carlisle 223 20. Magna 294 41. Faith Church 1077 21. Sunnyside 1641 42. Oak Ally 1038 Total Footage = 34,798' (6.6 mi) These streets were selected based on the 2015 Pavement Condition Rating Study. PO Box 2430 . 130 Blythe Drive . Indian Trail . North Carolina . 28079 . (704) 821-1314 . Fax (704) 821-1381 Staff recommends the list of streets for resurfacing in FY 16-17 If approved, staff will finalize a contract, advertise for bids, and present bid results to Council for consideration. Required Actions: Council Approval of the streets recommended for resurfacing in FY 16-17 Attachments: 1. Resurfacing Area Map PO Box 2430 . 130 Blythe Drive . Indian Trail . North Carolina . 28079 . (704) 821-1314 . Fax (704) 821-1381 Town of Indian Trail Memo TO: Mayor and Town Council FROM: Patrick Sadek, P.E. Director of Development Services DATE: 04/14/2017 SUBJECT: Annandale Subdivision Street Acceptance General Information: Annandale Developer has informed Town Engineering that the subdivision streets are ready for acceptance. Town Engineering Staff have examined the streets and requested certain repairs. The developer has completed the repairs, staff has evaluated and approved the repairs, and is ready to accept and release of any bonds. Below is a list of street names including segment length in miles/feet and attached is a map showing location of each street segment. Street Name Miles Dubarton Rd. 0.05 Emerson Ln. 0.01 Loudon Rd. 0.08 Potomac Rd. 0.15 Sedgewick Rd. 0.38 Terrapin St. 0.28 Total 0.95 Required Actions: 1. Approval to accept the streets and release any performance and maintenance bonds. Attachments: 1. Map PO Box 2430 . 130 Blythe Drive . Indian Trail . North Carolina . 28079 . (704) 821-1314 . Fax (704) 821-1381 Planning & Neighborhood Services PO Box 2430, Indian Trail, NC 28079 704 821-5401 Memo To: Mayor and Town Council From: Gretchen Coperine, AICP, Sr. Planner Date: April 13, 2017 Re: Memorandum of Understanding (Heritage East/West Connector) The Indian Trail Town Council on October 25, 2016 approved Conditional Rezone CZ2016- 005 for the Heritage (formerly Hawfield) subdivision, which is partly in the Town of Indian Trail and partly in the Village of Wesley Chapel. The attached Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is to establish that the Town of Indian Trail will maintain the main roadway which runs east/west through the community, also known as the East/West Connector, including a small portion within the Village of Wesley Chapel. This MOU will be followed in the future with an Interlocal Agreement between the two municipalities, which will more specifically setforth the understandings of the parties and that will authorize the Town of Indian Trail to manage, control, permit, and otherwise regulate all aspects of construction, maintenance, oversight, and regulation of the East-West Connector. Required Action by Council: Motion to Approve or Deny the MOU. Attachment 1- Memorandum of Understanding with Exhibits TOWN COUNCIL ATTACHMENT 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING For the Maintenance of the East-West Connector in the Village of Wesley Chapel, NC WHEREAS, the Heritage development is located within the corporate limits of the Village of Wesley Chapel and the Town of Indian Trail; and, WHEREAS, the Wesley Chapel Village Council approved conditional zoning for the Heritage development on November 14, 2016 and the Indian Trail Town Council gave similar approval to this development on October 25, 2016; and, WHEREAS, the site plan approved by the Village of Wesley Chapel and the Town of Indian Trail for the Heritage development is attached as Exhibit “A”; WHEREAS, the maintenance on the existing Hawfield Road will be abandoned by North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) and the process for abolishing the public roadway will be commenced if so petitioned by the developer (i.e., Kolter) its successors or assigns; and WHEREAS, there is one road planned within the development that is located within the Village of Wesley Chapel and the Town of Indian Trail.
Recommended publications
  • CRITICAL INFORMATION SUMMARY Plan Details for Internet and TV
    CRITICAL INFORMATION SUMMARY YOUR INFORMATION Name: John Smith Service Address: 66-2400 32 Ave NE, Calgary, AB, T2E 9A7 Mailing Address: 66-2400 32 Ave NE, Calgary, AB, T2E 9A7 Account Number: 099-1111-1111 AGREEMENT INFORMATION ValuePlan Commitment Period: 10 January 2020 to 9 January 2022 Plan Details for Internet and TV services, current as of 10 January 2020 Minimum Monthly Charges $114.00 One-Time Charges $0.00 Regular Rate of Service $194.00 Your service will continue month-to-month at this rate after expiry of your agreement. PLUS APPLICABLE TAXES. Internet (Services provided for the fixed term of the ValuePlan Commitment Period) Internet 300 $105.00 2-year ValuePlan Total Bundle Price Guarantee (10-Jan-2020 - 09-Jan- $0.00 2022) 2-year ValuePlan Total Bundle 24 Month Promotion (10-Jan-2020 - 09- -$10.50 Jan-2022) 2-year ValuePlan Total Bundle 12 Month Promotion (10-Jan-2020 - 09- -$21.00 Jan-2021) Internet & TV 2-year ValuePlan Agreement (10-Jan-2020 - 09-Jan-2022) $0.00 ValuePlan Internet Promotion (10-Jan-2020 - 09-Jan-2022) -$15.00 BlueCurve Gateway XB6 WiFi Modem Rental $0.00 BlueCurve Gateway XB6 WiFi Modem Rental Discount -$10.00 TV (Services provided for the fixed term of the ValuePlan Commitment Period) Total TV $95.00 2-year ValuePlan Total Bundle 24 Month Promotion (10-Jan-2020 - 09- -$9.50 Jan-2022) Internet + TV Total Bundle Discount -$11.00 2-year ValuePlan Total Bundle Price Guarantee (10-Jan-2020 - 09-Jan- $0.00 2022) ValuePlan Video Promotion (10-Jan-2020 - 09-Jan-2022) -$15.00 2-year ValuePlan Total Bundle 12 Month Promotion (10-Jan-2020 - 09- -$19.00 Jan-2021) Cable Equipment Rental - Motorola $15.00 An Early Cancellation Fee of $480 applies to this Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Effects of the Bell – Astral Acquisition on Media Concentration in Canada
    Broadcasting Notice of Consultation CRTC 2013-106 Item 1 – Application by Astral Media Inc. 2013-0244-7 PIAC/CAC/COSCO/NPSCF/OC – Appendix 1 – 5 April 2013 Page 0 Assessing the Effects of the Bell – Astral Acquisition on Media Concentration in Canada by Dwayne Winseck, Ph.D. Professor, School of Journalism and Communication, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada Prepared for the Public Interest Advocacy Centre, Consumers' Association of Canada, Council of Senior Citizens' Organizations of British Columbia, National Pensioners and Senior Citizens Federation, and Option consommateurs for the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission’s Hearings on the proposed acquisition of Astral Media Inc. by Bell Canada Enterprises to be held in Montreal, QC, May 6, 2013 April 5, 2013 Broadcasting Notice of Consultation CRTC 2013-106 Item 1 – Application by Astral Media Inc. 2013-0244-7 PIAC/CAC/COSCO/NPSCF/OC – Appendix 1 – 5 April 2013 Page 1 Abstract and Executive Summary This study has been prepared for the Public Interest Advocacy Centre to support its intervention at the CRTC hearings on the proposed take-over of Astral Media by BCE (Bell). This is a new proceeding that differs in some significant ways from Bell’s bid to acquire Astral Media last year that was denied by the CRTC. Notably, Astral asserts that “considering the significant divestitures proposed herein, there should not be any concerns relating to the share of revenue a combined Bell-Astral would have” (para 29, p. 30). This submission argues that the transaction deserves very close scrutiny. Based on a systematic and comprehensive body of evidence covering the Canada-wide, French- and English-language TV, Radio and other media markets from 1996 until 2011, its key findings can be summarized as follows: • a successful bid by Bell to acquire Astral would place it at the top of the ranks in radio, with 106 radio stations and revenues estimated at $463 million, or just under 24 percent of the national market (after divestitures).
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Canadian Programming Expenditure
    ANALYSIS OF CANADIAN PROGRAMMING EXPENDITURE AND PROGRAMS OF NATIONAL INTEREST PROPOSALS FILED BY THE ENGLISH-LANGUAGE BROADCAST GROUPS AS PART OF THEIR GROUP LICENCE RENEWAL APPLICATIONS (Broadcasting Notice of Consultation CRTC 2016-225) Prepared by: Mario Mota, Boon Dog Professional Services Inc. For: Alliance of Canadian Cinema, Television and Radio Artists (ACTRA); Canadian Media Producers Association (CMPA); Directors Guild of Canada (DGC); and Writers Guild of Canada (WGC) August 2016 i TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 1 Bell Media English Group .............................................................................................................. 1 Corus Entertainment ..................................................................................................................... 1 Rogers Media ................................................................................................................................ 2 II. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 2 Background ................................................................................................................................... 2 Some Trends Over the Current Licence Term ............................................................................... 4 II. GENERAL COMMENTS ABOUT THE BROADCAST GROUPS’ CPE AND PNI PROPOSALS .
    [Show full text]
  • Pricing and Operational Performance in Discretionary Services
    Pricing and Operational Performance in Discretionary Services Chunyang Tong School of International Business Administration, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, [email protected] Sampath Rajagopalan Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, [email protected] Abstract In many services, for example website or landscape design, the value or quality derived by a customer depends upon the service time and this valuation differs across customers. Customers procure the service based on the expected value to be delivered, prices charged and the timeliness of service. We investigate the performance of the optimal pricing scheme as well as two commonly used pricing schemes (fixed fee and time-based pricing) for such services on important dimensions such as revenue, demand served, and utilization. We propose a novel model that captures the above features and wherein both service rate and demand are endogenous and functions of the pricing scheme. In particular, service time is an outcome of the pricing scheme adopted and the heterogeneous valuations of customers, unlike in the queueing-based pricing literature. We find that the service system may benefit from a greater variance in consumer valuations, and the performance of pricing schemes is impacted by the shape of the distribution of customers' valuation of service time and the responsiveness desired by customers. Both the fixed fee and time-based schemes do well relative to the optimal pricing scheme in terms of revenue in many plausible scenarios, but there are substantial differences between the pricing schemes in some important operational metrics. For instance, the fixed fee scheme serves more customers and has higher utilization than the time-based scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Licence Renewals for French-Language Television Services
    Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2017-144 PDF version References: 2016-225, 2016-225-1, 2016-225-2, 2016-225-3 and 2016-225-4 Ottawa, 15 May 2017 Bell Media Inc. Across Canada Application 2016-0020-6 Public hearing in Laval, Quebec 22 to 24 November 2016 Bell Media Inc. – Licence renewals for French-language television services The Commission renews the broadcasting licences for the television services that will form Bell’s French-language Group for the next licence term, from 1 September 2017 to 31 August 2022. In addition, the Commission renews the broadcasting licence for RDS, which will not be part of the group, from 1 September 2017 to 31 August 2022. Application 1. Bell Media Inc. (Bell), on behalf of the licensees listed in Appendix 1 to this decision, filed an application to renew the broadcasting licences for the discretionary services set out in that same appendix, as well as the broadcasting licence for the discretionary service RDS. Bell requested that the licences for its French-language television services set out in Appendix 1 to this decision be renewed under the group-based approach and that the licence for RDS not be included in Bell’s French-language Group. 2. The Commission received several interventions in regard to the application. The public record for this proceeding can be found on the Commission’s website at www.crtc.gc.ca or by using the application number provided above. Commission’s analysis and decisions 3. The Commission’s determinations relating to the relevance of applying the group- based licensing approach to the Bell services and the implementation of this approach, as well as the determinations relating to issues common to all of the French-language ownership groups, are set out in Broadcasting Decision 2017-143 (the Introductory Decision), also issued today, which should be read in conjunction with this decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Form
    Abridged Page 1 of 17 Application to Renew a Broadcasting Licence for an INDIVIDUAL Cable Distribution Undertaking OR Application to Obtain a REGIONAL Broadcasting Licence for Cable Distribution Undertakings GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 1. Filing File electronically via Access Key by attaching the application to the Cover page. Access Key allows secure transmissions to the Commission and also authenticates your identity. Therefore, a signature is not required when using Access Key. Applicants who file their application in this manner are not required to submit a hard copy of the application and its related documents. Applicants who cannot send their application electronically with the Access Key service can contact the Commission at 1-877-249-CRTC (2782). Applicants who need further information relative to the CRTC processes can contact a Commission specialist at 1-866-781-1911. 2. Confidentiality requests At your request, portions of the application may be treated as confidential, pursuant to section 20 of the CRTC Rules of Procedure. The onus is on the applicant to request confidentiality for the information or material and to clearly demonstrate that the public interest will best be served by treating the information as confidential. For further information, refer to Circular No. 429 dated 19 August 1998. Applicants must ensure that documents that they request be treated as confidential are submitted in a separate electronic file and must indicate confidential in the name of the file. It is incumbent upon applicants to clearly identify the confidential documents by indicating confidential on each page and, in such cases, to file an abridged version of the document for the public file.
    [Show full text]
  • Bnoc 2016-225: Cmpa Appendix D
    BNOC 2016-225: CMPA APPENDIX D ANALYSIS OF CANADIAN PROGRAMMING EXPENDITURE AND PROGRAMS OF NATIONAL INTEREST PROPOSALS FILED BY THE ENGLISH-LANGUAGE BROADCAST GROUPS AS PART OF THEIR GROUP LICENCE RENEWAL APPLICATIONS (Broadcasting Notice of Consultation CRTC 2016-225) Prepared by: Mario Mota, Boon Dog Professional Services Inc. For: Alliance of Canadian Cinema, Television and Radio Artists (ACTRA); Canadian Media Producers Association (CMPA); Directors Guild of Canada (DGC); and Writers Guild of Canada (WGC) August 2016 i TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 1 Bell Media English Group .............................................................................................................. 1 Corus Entertainment ..................................................................................................................... 1 Rogers Media ................................................................................................................................ 2 II. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 2 Background ................................................................................................................................... 2 Some Trends Over the Current Licence Term ............................................................................... 4 II. GENERAL COMMENTS ABOUT THE BROADCAST GROUPS’
    [Show full text]
  • 1.3. the Approach of This Dissertation
    Tracing broadcast diversity and its manifestations in the CRTC’s Let’s Talk TV proceedings by Sylvia Blake M.A., Communication and Culture, Ryerson University and York University, 2011 B.A. (Hons.), Political Studies, Queen’s University 2009 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Communication Faculty of Communication, Art and Technology © Sylvia Blake 2018 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2018 Copyright in this work rests with the author. Please ensure that any reproduction or re-use is done in accordance with the relevant national copyright legislation. Approval Name: Sylvia Blake Degree: Doctor of Philosophy in Communication Title: Tracing broadcast diversity and its manifestations in the CRTC’s Let’s Talk TV proceedings Examining Committee: Chair: Dal Yong Jin Professor Alison Beale Senior Supervisor Professor Catherine Murray Supervisor Professor and Associate Dean, Undergraduate Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Zoë Druick Supervisor Professor Sarah Ganter Internal Examiner Assistant Professor Marc Raboy External Examiner Professor Emeritus Department of Art History and Communication Studies McGill University Date Defended/Approved: 05 June, 2018 ii Abstract Nurturing diversity is a key objective in Canadian public policy; however, “diversity” is polysemous, contested, flexible, and usually defined in an institutional context. The challenge of defining and ordering diversity objectives is particularly pronounced in broadcasting, wherein the CRTC is tasked with organizing a multitude of economic and social objectives put forward by a broad range of stakeholders. This dissertation unpacks the complex and contested notion of diversity, with a focus on the CRTC’s largest and most topically broad broadcast policy review of the decade: the 2013-2016 Let’s Talk TV (LTTV) proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • MAKE MORE POSSIBLE Rogers Communications Inc
    MAKE MORE POSSIBLE Rogers Communications Inc. | 2019 Annual Report OUR PURPOSE To connect Canadians to a world of possibilities and the memorable moments that matter most in their lives 2 ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2019 ANNUAL REPORT ABOUT ROGERS We are a team of proud Canadians dedicated to making more possible for our customers each and every day. Our founder, Ted Rogers, believed in the power of communication to enrich, entertain, and embolden Canadians. He followed in his father’s footsteps, and at the age of 27, purchased his first radio station, CHFI. From these modest beginnings, Rogers has grown to become a proud Canadian company – a company devoted to delivering the very best in wireless, residential, and media to Canadians and Canadian businesses. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 3 PAGE 4 PAGE 6 PAGE 8 PAGE 10 About Life at Bringing 5G to A Message A Message Rogers Rogers Canadians First from Edward from Joe PAGE 12 PAGE 14 PAGE 15 PAGE 16 PAGE 150 A Year Senior Executive Directors 2019 Corporate and in Review Officers Financial Report Shareholder Information 2019 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 3 We are a team of proud Canadians who love to work at Rogers: 88% of our LIFE AT team recommend Rogers as a great #ROGERS place to work! Incredible rewards, benefits & workplace As a proud Canadian company, we offer some of the best benefits and perks around: · Terrific discounts on our products and services, including the Toronto Blue Jays · Robust Wealth Accumulation Program · On-site fitness and health centres · Open-concept workspaces and cafés to meet and collaborate Amazing brands to build & grow your career Our amazing brands offer meaningful growth opportunities: · Over 100 brands to work for across radio stations, television stations, cable and wireless services, and sports · Invest more than $40 million in employee programs every year · Progressive programs for interns and new grads to get a head start in their career · Strong local teams in every major Canadian city 4 ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Digest
    2016⁄17 daD@ eS A definitive source for the media marketplace g THE BUSINESS OF MEDIA: The latest stats and insights on traditional, digital and emerging media MEDIA CHANNELS: Advertising spend in a slow economy CONSUMER DATA AND TRENDS: Adapting to changes in the consumer landscape 2 LETTER FROM THE CHAIR | CANADIAN MEDIA DIRECTORS’ COUNCIL The media challenge today is that we need Welcome to the to deliver across the continuum, from communications planning right through to Canadian Media programmatic offerings—tasks that truly sit at opposite ends of the spectrum, or so you Directors Council’s might think. The reality is that these and all a media planner LETTER FROM THE CHAIR the needs in-between are driven by two key makes and the only M way a marketer should i factors—consumer behaviour and data. c 2016–2017 edition of h e approve such a plan. le P Without a strong knowledge of their consumer a It requires fact-based u the Media Digest. c base, marketers are lost. How will they know hu decision-making. k where to place their communications, what is the | C Much thought and effort has been put into providing ha ir, Within this guide, you will you an invaluable guide to help you navigate the best angle for capturing attention and how will they CMD C find a wealth of information to continuously evolving world of media. develop strong relationships with their customers? help you start the journey to making We need to know what is influencing consumer those fact-based decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Discretionary Services Regulations
    Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2017-279 PDF version Reference: 2016-385 Ottawa, 4 August 2017 Discretionary Services Regulations The Commission announces that it has made the Discretionary Services Regulations (the Regulations). These Regulations merge the Pay Television Regulations, 1990 and the Specialty Services Regulations, 1990 into a single set of regulations to reflect the Commission’s determination in the Let’s Talk TV proceeding to streamline the licensing of programming services. The Regulations will be published in the Canada Gazette, Part II, and will come into force on 1 September 2017, with the exception of the Schedules, which will come into force on 1 September 2018. Introduction 1. The Commission announces that it has made, with some changes, the proposed Discretionary Services Regulations (the Regulations) set out in the appendix to Broadcasting Notice of Consultation 2016-385 (the Notice). 2. These Regulations merge the Pay Television Regulations, 1990 (Pay TV Regulations) and the Specialty Services Regulations, 1990 (Specialty Services Regulations) into a single set of regulations to reflect the Commission’s determination in the Let’s Talk TV proceeding to streamline the licensing of programming services. 3. The Regulations will be published in the Canada Gazette, Part II, and will come into force on 1 September 2017, with the exception of the Schedules, which will come into force on 1 September 2018. A copy of the Regulations is provided in the appendix to this regulatory policy. 4. The Commission received several interventions in response to its call for comments on a number of issues, including the following key issues: • the definition of “commercial message”; • Canadian content requirements; • undue preference provisions; • key figures; and • applicability of dispute resolution provisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcasting Notice of Consultation CRTC 2010-860
    Broadcasting Notice of Consultation CRTC 2010-860 PDF version Route reference: 2010-41 Additional references: 2010-41-1, 2010-41-2, 2010-861 Ottawa, 19 November 2010 Call for applications for licences to operate a French-language general interest pay television service The Commission calls for applications to operate a French-language general interest pay television service subject to certain conditions. A dissenting opinion by Commissioner Michel Morin is attached. 1. In Broadcasting Regulatory Policy 2010-861, also issued today, the Commission concluded that TVA Group Inc. had not demonstrated that the criteria set out in Broadcasting Public Notice 2008-100 have been met, nor has it demonstrated that opening up the general interest pay services genre to competition in the French- language market would offer more diversity to consumers. 2. In that regulatory policy, the Commission also indicated that a second French-language pay television service could be viable, provided that it does not compete directly with Super Écran, the existing pay television service. 3. Accordingly, the Commission hereby calls for applications by all parties wishing to obtain a broadcasting licence to operate a French-language national general interest pay television undertaking. 4. Interested parties must submit an application to the Commission no later than 30 May 2011. 5. It should be noted that, in making this call for applications, the Commission has not reached any conclusion with respect to the licensing or access privileges of any such service at this time. 6. Applicants will therefore be required to provide evidence clearly demonstrating demand and a market for the proposed service.
    [Show full text]