Jurisdictions and Organization of AACC Members자료집

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jurisdictions and Organization of AACC Members자료집 AACC SRD Research Jurisdictions and Organization of AACC Members Preface This book marks the first research publication of the Secretariat for Research and Development (SRD) of the Association of Asian Constitutional Courts and Equivalent Institutions (AACC). It contains the introductory overview of the jurisdictions and organization of AACC member institutions and results of the 1st Research Conference of the AACC SRD (29 May – 1 June 2018). AACC SRD annually selects a research topic to work on and hosts a regular conference that brings together institutions of constitutional justice from across the Asian region to discuss matters of constitutional adjudication, fundamental rights and principles of constitutionalism. In doing so, AACC SRD aims to generate one publication that will be of interest not just for AACC members, but the global research community. In addition, AACC SRD is building a stimulating environment for comparative constitutional research at its office in Seoul, where seconded officers from AACC member institutions are closely working together with AACC SRD staff on a daily basis, such as during the production of this research book. The AACC is truly diverse, consisting of members from civil law and common law traditions, as well as members operating in environments which combine different legal traditions. The materials contained in this publication allow the reader to discover the similarities and differences between AACC member institutions, and can assist in developing insights for strengthening constitutional justice in the Asian region. The introductory chapter lays out the context, production process and key contents of the book. The comparative tables allow a quick overview of the basic information of AACC member institutions. The AACC Member Fact Files contain detailed information on historical backgrounds, organizational matters, constitutional jurisdictions, and key cases. The Conference Summary Report enables the reader to revisit the presentations and key points of discussion at AACC SRD’s 1st Research Conference. I sincerely believe that this volume, together with future updated editions, can act as a permanent foundation to bring AACC members closer together, to enable the global community to engage further with the AACC, and to provide inspiration for research in the field of comparative constitutional law in Asia and beyond. I extend my deepest gratitude to the AACC member institutions and the staff at AACC SRD for making this publication possible. Heon Jeong Kim Secretary General AACC SRD / Constitutional Court of Korea Congratulatory Message In this fitting month to bid farewell to the year 2018, I sincerely congratulate the Secretariat for Research and Development (SRD) of the Association of Asian Constitutional Courts and Equivalent Institutions (AACC) for reaping the harvest of hard work: its first research publication “Jurisdictions and Organization of AACC Members.” Let me extend my sincere gratitude to the staff of the AACC SRD for their enthusiasm and dedication over the course of this year. This book provides a comparative review of the jurisdictions and organizations of the AACC member institutions. The publication holds value and importance because it is unprecedented. It is an embodiment of relentless efforts put forward by the 16 AACC member institutions, not to mention the 1st Research Conference of the AACC SRD. I express my appreciation and congratulations to the AACC member institutions and the AACC SRD for their active engagement. The AACC was established by Asian constitutional courts and equivalent institutions with the aim of ensuring basic human rights and promoting the development of democracy and rule of law in Asia through constitutional justice. It can be a strenuous task to fully achieve this goal, as Asia encompasses a diverse spectrum of culture, history and religion. However, I would like to quote an old Korean saying that ‘a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.’ I am confident that every footstep taken by the AACC member institutions, including the publication of this book, will strengthen the respect for human rights, democracy, and the rule of law in Asia. As an AACC member institution that hosts the AACC SRD, the Constitutional Court of Korea shall duly endeavor to reach the Association’s common objectives. I earnestly hope that this book will be a useful source of information for inquisitive minds who wish to understand AACC member institutions and constitutional justice in Asia. Namseok Yoo President Constitutional Court of Korea Contents PART A. Introduction: Connecting Institutions of Constitutional Justice in Asia 1. Background and context 2 2. Method and process 4 3. Getting to know AACC members 7 PART B. AACC Members: Comparative Tables 1. Overview of AACC member institutions 12 2. Judicial appointment procedures and terms of office 12 3. Jurisdictions 15 PART C. AACC Members: Fact Files 1. Afghanistan 22 2. Azerbaijan 32 3. Indonesia 54 4. Kazakhstan 88 5. Republic of Korea 107 6. Kyrgyz Republic 136 7. Malaysia 150 8. Mongolia 166 9. Myanmar 181 10. Pakistan 191 11. Philippines 209 12. Russia 224 13. Tajikistan 241 14. Thailand 249 15. Turkey 280 PART D. 1st Research Conference of the AACC SRD: Summary Report 1. Introduction 304 2. Session I 306 3. Session II 310 4. Session III 314 5. Session IV 316 6. Session V 319 7. Session VI 322 8. Conclusion 324 PART A. INTRODUCTION: CONNECTING INSTITUTIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE IN ASIA 2 Jurisdictions and Organization of AACC Members 1. Background and context 1.1 Building AACC SRD The 20th century witnessed the increased institutionalization of constitutional justice across the world. In the 21st century, this valuable achievement can be further secured and advanced. The Association of Asian Constitutional Courts and Equivalent Institutions (AACC) was established in July 2010 to promote this goal, particularly in the Asian region. According to Article 3 of the AACC Statute,1 the AACC’s objectives are the protection of human rights, the guarantee of democracy, the implementation of the rule of law, and the independence of constitutional courts and equivalent institutions. One vital step towards achieving these objectives is to increase the exchange of experiences and information among AACC members. The Secretariat for Research and Development (SRD) of the AACC provides a permanent platform for this process. Current members of the AACC are the following 16 institutions of constitutional justice: The Independent Commission for Overseeing the Implementation of the Constitution (ICOIC) of Afghanistan, the Constitutional Court of Azerbaijan, the Constitutional Court of Indonesia, the Constitutional Council of Kazakhstan, the Constitutional Court of Korea, the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court of the Kyrgyz Republic, the Federal Court of Malaysia, the Constitutional Court of Mongolia, the Constitutional Tribunal of Myanmar, the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the Supreme Court of the Philippines, the Constitutional Court of Russia, the Constitutional Court of Tajikistan, the Constitutional Court of Thailand, the Constitutional Court of Turkey, and the Constitutional Court of Uzbekistan. In August 2016 a consensus was achieved among AACC members to establish the Secretariat for Research and Development (SRD) in Seoul, hosted by the Constitutional Court of Korea. The AACC SRD officially started its operations in January 2017, and held its inaugural Justices’ Conference in 2017 (30 October – 2 November). Building on the Justices’ Conference, the idea for this book took further shape during the preparations for AACC SRD’s inaugural 2018 Research Conference. This important event, entitled Jurisdictions and Organization of AACC Members, was held in 2018 (29 May – 1 June) and set the research direction for AACC SRD and bears its fruits in this book. The publication of this book is significant for AACC SRD. Not only is this book the first official research publication of AACC SRD, but its contents are specifically designed to begin to map out the jurisdictional powers and organizational design of individual AACC members in one volume. Since the current contents are solely based on the materials made available for the 2018 AACC SRD Research Conference, future updated and expanded editions of this publication are expected. For now, this publication serves as the foundation for further in-depth research at AACC SRD. AACC SRD’s research output can connect AACC members and contribute to the global debate on constitutionalism. This introductory chapter highlights the context, process and potential of this book. 1.2 Connecting AACC members The Asian continent is diverse, and so is the membership of the AACC. Dotted across Asia, going from East to West, reaching even what may be simultaneously referred to as European parts of the world, AACC member institutions are located in Seoul, Manila, Ulaanbaatar, Jakarta, Putrajaya, Bangkok, Naypyidaw, Bishkek, Islamabad, Astana, Tashkent, Kabul, Dushanbe, Baku, Ankara and St. Petersburg. Diverse geographical locations are combined with diverse histories, cultures, economies, politics, societies, as well as legal systems and constitutional institutions. One key task of AACC SRD is to 1 Available on the AACC SRD website (About Us / AACC SRD), at: http://www.aaccrd.org/en/main.do. Introduction 3 assist AACC members in identifying commonalities and differences within the AACC framework, and together work on overcoming challenges and realizing opportunities in
Recommended publications
  • In Late Colonial India: 1942-1944
    Rohit De ([email protected]) LEGS Seminar, March 2009 Draft. Please do not cite, quote, or circulate without permission. EMASCULATING THE EXECUTIVE: THE FEDERAL COURT AND CIVIL LIBERTIES IN LATE COLONIAL INDIA: 1942-1944 Rohit De1 On the 7th of September, 1944 the Chief Secretary of Bengal wrote an agitated letter to Leo Amery, the Secretary of State for India, complaining that recent decisions of the Federal Court were bringing the governance of the province to a standstill. “In war condition, such emasculation of the executive is intolerable”, he thundered2. It is the nature and the reasons for this “emasculation” that the paper hopes to uncover. This paper focuses on a series of confrontations between the colonial state and the colonial judiciary during the years 1942 to 1944 when the newly established Federal Court struck down a number of emergency wartime legislations. The courts decisions were unexpected and took both the colonial officials and the Indian public by surprise, particularly because the courts in Britain had upheld the legality of identical legislation during the same period. I hope use this episode to revisit the discussion on the rule of law in colonial India as well as literature on judicial behavior. Despite the prominence of this confrontation in the public consciousness of the 1940’s, its role has been downplayed in both historical and legal accounts. As I hope to show this is a result of a disciplinary divide in the historical engagement with law and legal institutions. Legal scholarship has defined the field of legal history as largely an account of constitutional and administrative developments paralleling political developments3.
    [Show full text]
  • President Addresses First Joint Session of New Kazakh Parliament
    +5° / +1°C WEDNESDAY, MARCH 30, 2016 No 6 (96) www.astanatimes.com President Addresses First Exit Poll Says Nur Otan Joint Session of New Kazakh Wins Overwhelmingly as Parliament, Sets Priorities Mazhilis Retains Previous Makeup greens Birlik (Unity) grabbed mea- By Galiaskar Seitzhan ger 0.35 percent. This outcome is basically a virtual repetition of the ASTANA – President Nursultan previous parliamentary election in Nazarbayev-led Nur Otan Party January 2012, which ended with won 82 percent of the popular vote very similar results. in the parliamentary election in Turnout, however, proved strong- Kazakhstan, according to exit poll er this time setting a new record in results announced at midnight on the country’s electoral history and March 21. beating the result from four years The survey also showed the ruling ago when 75.45 percent of regis- party will be opposed by the same tered voters showed up at the polls. parties in the new convocation of Yulia Kuchinskaya, head of the President Nursultan Nazarbayev (at the speaking rostrum) addresses the first joint session of the Senate and the Mazhilis on March 25. the Mazhilis (the national legisla- Astana-based Institute of Democ- ture’s lower chamber) as it was the racy sociological survey company pro-business Ak zhol Democratic According to Kazakhstan’s Cen- niversary of independence with Nazarbayev recalled that the omy of Kazakhstan. Various social Party and leftist Communist Peo- tral Election Commission Chair- By Malika orazgaliyeva the newly elected parliament. 25th anniversary of Kazakhstan’s problems grow even in relatively ple’s Party again barely crossed the man (CEC) Kuandyk Turgankulov, Three parties and nine members independence coincided with a prosperous countries, he noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Chambers: Unicameral Or Bicameral?
    Legislative Chambers: Unicameral or Bicameral? Legislative Chambers: Unicameral or Bicameral? How many chambers a parliament should have is a controversial question in constitutional law. Having two legislative chambers grew out of the monarchy system in the UK and other European countries, where there was a need to represent both the aristocracy and the common man, and out of the federal system in the US. where individual states required representation. In recent years, unicameral systems, or those with one legislative chamber, were associated with authoritarian states. Although that perception does not currently hold true, there appears to be a general trend toward two chambers in emerging democracies, particularly in larger countries. Given historical, cultural and political factors, governments must decide whether one-chamber or two chambers better serve the needs of the country. Bicameral Chambers A bicameral legislature is composed of two-chambers, usually termed the lower house and upper house. The lower house is usually based proportionally on population with each member representing the same number of citizens in each district or region. The upper house varies more broadly in the way in which members are selected, including inheritance, appointment by various bodies and direct and indirect elections. Representation in the upper house can reflect political subdivisions, as is the case for the US Senate, German Bundesrat and Indian Rajya Sabha. Bicameral systems tend to occur in federal states, because of that system’s two-tiered power structure. Where subdivisions are drawn to coincide with other important societal units, the upper house can serve to represent ethnic, religious or tribal groupings, as in India or Ethiopia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strange Revival of Bicameralism
    The Strange Revival of Bicameralism Coakley, J. (2014). The Strange Revival of Bicameralism. Journal of Legislative Studies, 20(4), 542-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2014.926168 Published in: Journal of Legislative Studies Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights © 2014 Taylor & Francis. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:01. Oct. 2021 Published in Journal of Legislative Studies , 20 (4) 2014, pp. 542-572; doi: 10.1080/13572334.2014.926168 THE STRANGE REVIVAL OF BICAMERALISM John Coakley School of Politics and International Relations University College Dublin School of Politics, International Studies and Philosophy Queen’s University Belfast [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT The turn of the twenty-first century witnessed a surprising reversal of the long-observed trend towards the disappearance of second chambers in unitary states, with 25 countries— all but one of them unitary—adopting the bicameral system.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of India
    Supreme Court of India drishtiias.com/printpdf/supreme-court-of-india The Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial court and the final court of appeal under the Constitution of India, the highest constitutional court, with the power of judicial review. India is a federal State and has a single and unified judicial system with three tier structure, i.e. Supreme Court, High Courts and Subordinate Courts. Brief History of the Supreme Court of India The promulgation of Regulating Act of 1773 established the Supreme Court of Judicature at Calcutta as a Court of Record, with full power & authority. It was established to hear and determine all complaints for any crimes and also to entertain, hear and determine any suits or actions in Bengal, Bihar and Orissa. The Supreme Courts at Madras and Bombay were established by King George – III in 1800 and 1823 respectively. The India High Courts Act 1861 created High Courts for various provinces and abolished Supreme Courts at Calcutta, Madras and Bombay and also the Sadar Adalats in Presidency towns. These High Courts had the distinction of being the highest Courts for all cases till the creation of Federal Court of India under the Government of India Act 1935. The Federal Court had jurisdiction to solve disputes between provinces and federal states and hear appeal against Judgements from High Courts. After India attained independence in 1947, the Constitution of India came into being on 26 January 1950. The Supreme Court of India also came into existence and its first sitting was held on 28 January 1950.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Parties Say Govt Limiting Political, Civil Activities at News Report
    Eye on the News [email protected] Truthful, Factual and Unbiased Vol:XI Issue No:126 Price: Afs.20 www.afghanistantimes.af www.facebook.com/ afghanistantimeswww.twitter.com/ afghanistantimes SUNDAY . DECEMBER 03. 2017 -Qaws 12, 1396 HS AT Monitoring Desk Regional Studies (CSRS) shows. government has no real will in The survey entitled ‘Peace bringing peace in the country. KABUL: Most Afghan people Stalemate and Solutions’ was The result of the survey shows: believe that an Afghan-led and conducted in six provinces • 83.8% of the respondents Afghan-owned peace process can including Kabul, Herat, Kandahar, said the current war has no winner put an end to the current war Balkh and Kunduz. The results and it can only be stopped by between the government and were released on Saturday at a bringing about peace. Taliban group, a survey conducted meeting in Kabul. A big number of • 67.4% of the respondents by the Center for Strategic and the respondents also have said that said the government has no...P2 Political parties say govt limiting political, civil activities AT News Report KABUL: Some political parties accuse the government of restricting political and civil activities which is against democracy. Meanwhile, a number of parliamentarians call opposition to the Kandahar session illegal, saying that political parties have the right to criticize government. They said that government made efforts to prevent Ata Mohammad Noor from participating in the Kandahar session, a measure that shows the government restricting political activities. Political parties AT News Report current uncertainly, aimed at crisis. “If the nation doesn’t raise National Directorate of Security, say that the government is bringing reforms and overcome voices, challenges will be increased and leadership-member of opposing any political and civil KABUL: A group of politicians, challenges nationwide.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Participants Liste Des Participants
    LIST OF PARTICIPANTS LISTE DES PARTICIPANTS 142nd IPU Assembly and Related Meetings (virtual) 24 to 27 May 2021 - 2 - Mr./M. Duarte Pacheco President of the Inter-Parliamentary Union Président de l'Union interparlementaire Mr./M. Martin Chungong Secretary General of the Inter-Parliamentary Union Secrétaire général de l'Union interparlementaire - 3 - I. MEMBERS - MEMBRES AFGHANISTAN RAHMANI, Mir Rahman (Mr.) Speaker of the House of the People Leader of the delegation EZEDYAR, Mohammad Alam (Mr.) Deputy Speaker of the House of Elders KAROKHAIL, Shinkai (Ms.) Member of the House of the People ATTIQ, Ramin (Mr.) Member of the House of the People REZAIE, Shahgul (Ms.) Member of the House of the People ISHCHY, Baktash (Mr.) Member of the House of the People BALOOCH, Mohammad Nadir (Mr.) Member of the House of Elders HASHIMI, S. Safiullah (Mr.) Member of the House of Elders ARYUBI, Abdul Qader (Mr.) Secretary General, House of the People Member of the ASGP NASARY, Abdul Muqtader (Mr.) Secretary General, House of Elders Member of the ASGP HASSAS, Pamir (Mr.) Acting Director of Relations to IPU Secretary to the delegation ALGERIA - ALGERIE GOUDJIL, Salah (M.) Président du Conseil de la Nation Président du Groupe, Chef de la délégation BOUZEKRI, Hamid (M.) Vice-Président du Conseil de la Nation (RND) BENBADIS, Fawzia (Mme) Membre du Conseil de la Nation Comité sur les questions relatives au Moyen-Orient KHARCHI, Ahmed (M.) Membre du Conseil de la Nation (FLN) DADA, Mohamed Drissi (M.) Secrétaire Général, Conseil de la Nation Secrétaire général
    [Show full text]
  • Standing Group on Parliaments 5Th Bi-Annual Conference
    Standing Group on Parliaments 5th bi-annual conference 27-29 June 2019 Leiden, the Netherlands We thank the Institute of Political Science for their financial support and ECPR Central Services for their logistical support and advice. LOCAL ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Rudy Andeweg Tom Louwerse Tim Mickler Cynthia van Vonno 2 1. THE MAIN VENUES The welcome drinks and panels take place at the Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences of Leiden University. The address is: Pieter de la Court Building, Wassenaarseweg 52, Leiden. It is marked on the map below. The conference dinner on Friday takes place in Het Prentenkabinet, Kloksteeg 25 ( on the map). It is a 20-minute walk from the conference venue. Scan the QR code to open this map on your phone. 3 2. PARLIAMENT EXCURSION Participants who have registered for participation in the excursion to the Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal, the lower chamber of the Dutch parliament, are expected at Leiden Centraal train station at 15h00 on Thursday 27 June. We will meet in the main hall of the train station in front of Starbucks. Important! You will need to buy your own return train ticket to The Hague Central station (‘Den Haag Centraal’) from the ticket machines at the station, or alternatively buy online beforehand. If you are already in The Hague, you can join us at the parliament building, entrance Lange Poten 4 (https://goo.gl/maps/ibaHM2PmVrK81dLC9). Important! Your ID card or passport is required to enter the building. Please do not bring large pieces of luggage. 3. LUNCH AND COFFEE BREAKS Lunches and coffee/tea breaks will take place in the Pieter de la Court building.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia in January 2021
    Month in Review: Central Asia in January 2021 The first month of 2021 in the countries of Central Asia began with parliamentary and presidential elections in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, the purchase of various vaccines for coronavirus, periodic protests, and an ambiguous epidemiological situation in different countries. The analytical platform CABAR.asia presents a brief overview of the major events in the region over the past month. Follow us on LinkedIn Kazakhstan General epidemiological situation In January, compared to December, there is an increase in the incidence of coronavirus by 10 percent in Kazakhstan, from 23.1 thousand to 25.6 thousand cases. The number of laboratory-confirmed cases of coronavirus infection in Kazakhstan, according to official data, amounted to 187 970. Where 2,556 people died (seven deaths were registered on January 31). Cancellation of strict quarantine in Almaty Almaty has moved from the “yellow” to the “green” zone in terms of the rate of detection of those infected with coronavirus. The city stayed in the “yellow” zone for one day – January 30. The severity of quarantine measures depends on which zone (“red”, “yellow” or “green”) the city or region is located in. Earlier, on January 28, Almaty was in the “red” zone, the sanitary inspector of the city Zhandarbek Bekshin decided to tighten quarantine measures from February 1. Among the measures taken were the mandatory hospitalization of patients with any form of coronavirus – mild or severe, a new schedule of catering from 9 am to 8 pm, a ban on work on the weekends. Bekshin also decided to suspend the work of cinemas and theaters, which had Month in Review: Central Asia in January 2021 begun work in October 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly E-Bulletin 11.10.2016-17.10
    11.10.2016-17.10.2016 • No: 85 EVALUATION OF THE PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS TO THE STATE DUMA IN RUSSIA The 7th legislative elections for the State received 19.19%, the Just Russia Party re- gard, on April 5, 2016, in accordance with the Duma, which is the Lower House of the ceived 13.24% and the Liberal Democratic Decree №157 the Federal National Guard Russian Parliament, were held on September Party of Russia received 11.67% of total Troops Service was established and states- 18, 2016. According to the results of the votes. As a result, the United Russia Party men, who have an authority in the military Russian Central Election Commission, took 238 seats, the Communist Party of the forces, were appointed as governors in some 47.82% (namely 52,631,849) of 110,061,200 Russian Federation took 92 seats, the Just subjects of the Russian Federation. Therefore, registered voters participated in the elections Russia Party took 64 seats and the Liberal the 7th elections to the State Duma were and the United Russia Party won with 54.20% Democratic Party of Russia took 56 seats in conducted in this complex environment. of total votes (28,527,828). According to the the State Duma. As for the elections results, 4580 parliamen- Constitution, the Russian Parliament (Federal The parliamentary elections to the State Duma tary candidates participated in the elections. Assembly) consists of two chambers – the coincided with the period of strained interna- Four parties were able to overcome the 5% State Duma and the Federation Council (art. tional relations between Russia and the West, threshold: the United Russia Party gained 95).The legislative power of the State Duma especially the U.S., over Syria and increased 54.20% of votes (28,527,828), the Communist can be distinguished mostly in terms of func- socio-economic problems in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Joanna Marszałek-Kawa1 the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan. the Organisation of Work, Competences and Legal Status Of
    „Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego” ------- Nr 2 (18)/2014 ------- Joanna Marszałek-Kawa1 The Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The organisation of work, competences and legal status of deputies Keywords: The Republic of Kazakhstan, legislature, unicameral parliament, bicameral parliament, deputy, presidential system Słowa kluczowe: Republika Kazachstanu, legislatywa, jednoizbowy parlament, dwuiz- bowy parlament, deputowany, system prezydencki Summary According to the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan of 30 August 1995, Ka- zakhstan has a presidential form of government. The executive power in Kazakhstan has two branches, i.e. it consists of the head of state – the President of the Republic – who is elected for the period of seven years in general, equal, direct and secret elections, and of the government, which is accountable to the President and the Parliament. On the basis of the provisions of chapter 12 of the Constitution of the Republic of Ka- zakhstan of 28 January 1993, the unicameral parliament called the „Supreme Coun- cil” was the only representative and legislative body of the Republic. Two years later, in the referendum held in August 1995, citizens voted for the establishment of a bicamer- al parliament. The work and activity of the legislative branch, its structure and powers, is regulated by the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan, The Constitutional Law № 2529 of 16 October 1996 entitled On the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Sta- tus of Its Deputies as well as other acts, such as parliamentary rules of procedure of both chambers or the Regulations of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan adopted by both chambers of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan at their joint session on 20 May 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Studia BAS Nr 3(27) 2011
    Studia BAS Studia Biura Analiz Sejmowych kancelarii sejmu 3(27) 2011 ISSN 2080-2404 3(27) 2011 Wybrane problemy systemów wyborczych systemów problemy Wybrane Wybrane problemy systemów wyborczych „Studia BAS” znajdują się w wykazie czasopism naukowych prowadzonym przez Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego dla potrzeb oceny jednostek Biuro Analiz Sejmowych zapewnia posłom i organom Sejmu informacje o szczególnej naukowych z przyznaną liczbą 6 punktów. rzetelności, które pozwalają na bezpieczne i efektywne wykonywanie mandatu poselskiego oraz gwarantują właściwą pozycję parlamentu w systemie trójpodziału władzy. TM Biuro wykonuje swe zadania na rzecz Sejmu i jego organów, klubów parlamentarnych i kół poselskich, EMIS jak również indywidualnych posłów. TM EMERGING MARKETS INFORMATION SERVICE A PRODUCT OF ISI EMERGING MARKETS Dorobek BAS udostępniany jest przez wydawnictwa, elektroniczną bazę danych oraz konfe- rencje i seminaria. Wydawnictwa Biura Analiz Sejmowych: Przed pierwszym czytaniem – seria zawierająca ekspertyzy Biura. Składa się przede wszystkim z opinii do projektów ustaw i jest w efekcie dokumentacją procesu stanowienia ich kształtu. POLECAMY RÓwnież POPRZEDNIE NUMERY KWARTALNIKA Tytuł stanowi nasze zobowiązanie do jak najszybszego dostarczania informacji w procesie „Studia BAS” legislacyjnym. „INFOS. Zagadnienia społeczno-gospodarcze” – pismo z krótkimi publikacjami informacyjno-anali- tycznymi, dotyczącymi zagadnień ważnych dla Polski i jej społeczeństwa. Naszą ambicją jest, aby Zasada równości i zasada niedyskryminacji poruszane zagadnienia stały się inspiracją dla parlamentarzystów w ich pracy poselskiej. pod redakcją B. Kłos i J. Szymańczak „Studia BAS” – kwartalnik o profilu społeczno-gospodarczym. Każdy numer czasopisma poświę- cony jest wybranemu tematowi ekonomicznemu lub społecznemu. Wybór zagadnień po- Innowacyjność polskiej gospodarki dyktowany jest aktualnością problematyki, jej wagą społeczną, a także związkiem z pracami pod redakcją A.
    [Show full text]