Sage Thrasher

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sage Thrasher Sage Thrasher Nesting habitat of this Endangered species has been lost to urban and agricultural development. Province of British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks settlement. It is estimated that 60 per- nesting sites in the south Okanagan cent of the original sagebrush-steppe in have been developed for farming or adjacent Washington state has been de- housing and no longer support nesting stroyed. Habitat loss in Washington thrashers. The status of the Sage Why are Sage Thrashers could also jeopardize these birds by fur- Thrasher in British Columbia is indeed at risk? ther isolating British Columbia habitats precarious. ritish Columbia’s small nesting and reducing the number of birds that population of Sage Thrashers is lim- spill over into the province. What do they look like? ited by availability of suitable habitat age Thrashers are slightly smaller B in the south Okanagan. Near Oliver What is their status? than an American Robin, with a and Penticton, development of or- n British Columbia, Sage Thrashers brownish-grey back, buffy white un- chards and vineyards has destroyed are on the BC Environment Red List S derparts heavily streaked with some habitat where thrashers nested in (species being considered for legal brown, yellow eye, robin-like bill, white the 1920s. Prime sagebrush habitat has I designation as Endangered or tips on the outer tail feathers and two been lost to alfalfa production and other Threatened) and considered to narrow, white bars on the wings. Males areas have been degraded by heavy live- be “critically en- and females have similar mark- stock use, or by range rehabilitation dangered” by the The Sage ings. Its general colouring pro- projects such as sagebrush mowing, Conservation Data Thrasher is vides good camouflage in burning, or spraying with herbicides. Centre. They are sagebrush landscapes. It is a secre- Increasing human populations and designated as En- designated as tive bird of dense sagebrush thick- more intensive land use continue to dangered by the Endangered ets and prefers running to flying threaten the remaining 50 percent of Committee on the when searching for food. It is Sage Thrasher habitat in the south Status of Endan- by . more often heard than seen. Okanagan and Similkameen valleys. gered Wildlife in Birders wishing to add this spe- Residential, or other developments, are Canada (), and listed as a Spe- cies to their British Columbia list should of particular concern in the Richter Pass cies of Concern in Washington. visit sagebrush stands in the south and White Lake areas. Like most birds in British Columbia, Okanagan-Similkameen area in late As with most birds, Sage Thrashers the Sage Thrasher, its nests and eggs are May or June, preferably with guidance suffer some losses due to nest destruc- protected under the Federal Migratory from local naturalists who know the tion by ground predators, raptor preda- Bird Protection Act and the provincial whereabouts of this sparsely distributed tion on naive fledglings, human distur- Wildlife Act. However, no habitats bird. Extreme care must be taken not to bance, or other factors. Where habitats critical for survival of the species in disturb nesting birds. Please do not ap- are suitable, enough young are normally British Columbia are currently pro- proach the birds; listen and view from a produced to balance these losses, tected against loss or degradation. distance of 25 metres or more. and thrasher pop- Typical of many birds at the ulations do not de- No habitats northern limit of their range, Sage What makes them unique? cline. Loss of habi- critical for Thrasher numbers in British he Sage Thrasher’s scientific name, tat, however, per- Columbia fluctuate from year Oreoscoptes montanus, means manently reduces the survival to year, with some sites being oc- “mimic of the mountains” but, un- the number of cupied only rarely. Recently, T like several members of the of the species thrashers that any however, there also appears to thrasher-mockingbird family, Sage area will support. in British have been a substantial decline in Thrashers do not mimic other birds. In the United Columbia the nesting population. At its his- Their song has been described as “ec- States, large areas torical high in the 1930s, or ear- static” and “energetic” and inspired of Sage Thrasher are currently lier, the spring population in Brit- American ornithologist, A.C. Bent, to nesting habitat protected. ish Columbia may have reached call the Sage Thrasher “the poet of have been lost due 30 or more pairs nesting at up to the lonesome sagebrush plain.” The to livestock range six sites. Only four to ten pairs territorial song is a long series of alteration, cultivation of crops, strip have been seen in recent years, at only warbled phrases lasting up to 2.5 mining, reservoir flooding, and land one or two sites. At least two former minutes, usually made with head held high, from the top of a big sage. Call ally positioned where sagebrush foliage cated. In good habitat, nesting territo- notes include a sharp “chuck” and a provides some shade, the enterprising ries are about 5 hectares in size. high “churr.” thrashers sometimes build shade cano- Sage Thrashers usually lay four or True to their name, Sage Thrashers pies over them. five eggs. These are about 2.5 cm long, throughout their range prefer relatively smooth and glossy, with a medium to dense stands of tall sagebrush for nest- How do they reproduce? light blue ground colour that is boldly ing. In the United States, nests are some- pon arrival from their winter range spotted and blotched with reddish- times built in other shrubs associated in April or May, males select suitable brown. The eggs, incubated by both with sagebrush, including rabbitbrush, sagebrush stands where they sing sexes, hatch in about 15 days; nestlings antelope-brush, and juniper. In British U from the tops of tall shrubs to attract fledge about 13 days after hatching. The Columbia, exceptions to sagebrush for females and to let other males know the total nesting period, including egg-lay- nesting involved a nest in a peach tree in territory is occupied. In British Colum- ing, is about 32 days. a newly planted bia, nesting may begin in late May Broods of one to five young have orchard, and a or early June, reach a peak later in been reported in British Columbia. nest in a haw- Sage Thrashers June, and is largely finished by More intensive studies in the United thorn tree at prefer dense mid-July. Most Sage Thrashers in States conclude that about two young White Lake. the Okanagan migrate south in are successfully fledged per nesting at- Sage Thrasher stands of late August or early September. tempt. In the United States, where Sage nests are bulky tall sagebrush Nests are mostly 15 to 36 centi- Thrashers frequently produce two structures that metres above the ground; occa- broods each summer, the male is be- require sturdy for nesting. sionally they are built on the lieved to feed the newly fledged young shrubs for sup- ground under thick brush. The for a few days while the female incubates port. They are made of coarse sagebrush woody nests of Sage Thrashers persist the second clutch. twigs, rootlets and plant stems, and for a year or more, providing a reliable Although nesting information for lined with fine grasses, bark-shreds, and indication of breeding occurrence and British Columbia is limited, most livestock hair. Although nests are usu- habitat selection long after they are va- thrashers here seem to have only one brood, which coincides in timing with the southern Similkameen and Present range of the Sage Thrasher the second brood of birds that nest far- Okanagan valleys, an area considerably in Canada and the United States ther south. This suggests that some less than one percent of the province. Breeding range Wintering range thrashers may move into the province Although this species has a wide range after a failed first attempt at nesting in outside British Columbia, this range ex- Washington. tends only barely into the province. Nesting has been documented from the What do they eat? United States border north to lthough largely insect-eaters, Sage Penticton, including Osoyoos Lake, Thrashers also take fruits and Kilpoola Lake, Chopaka, Richter Pass, berries when available. Food habits Oliver, White Lake, and West Bench. A of this species have not Sage Thrashers been well studied in British Co- Sage have also been re- lumbia, but observations in the Thrashers ported during the United States indicate that breeding season ground-dwelling beetles, grass- nest regularly in suitable nest- hoppers, crickets, and ants are im- only in the ing habitat near portant items in the nesting sea- Vernon, Cache son. Other invertebrates taken in- southern Creek, and Kam- clude caterpillars, weevils, Similkameen loops and may leafhoppers, flies, and spiders. occasionally nest Sage Thrashers also show a fond- and in those areas. As ness for berries, including cur- Okanagan with many species rants, gooseberries, blackberries, of birds, vagrants arrive in May. Sightings of Sage Thrash- and Saskatoon berries. valleys. are sometimes ers north of their usual south Okanagan seen outside the nesting range have mostly been in April, Where do they live? usual breeding areas. Such records for and probably involve birds that over- age Thrashers nest only in the dry, the Sage Thrasher include Vancouver shoot the traditional breeding areas. sagebrush-dominated plains and Island, Revelstoke, the Fraser River This behaviour frequently occurs in intermountain basins of western delta, 100 Mile House, and Creston. birds, and has survival advantage for the S North America. Populations have Sage Thrashers are migratory and oc- species (if not the individual) by ensur- declined in many areas because of habi- cur in British Columbia only in spring ing that any new peripheral habitats are tat loss through urban development and and summer.
Recommended publications
  • Species Assessment for Sage Thrasher (Oreoscoptes Montanus) in Wyoming
    SPECIES ASSESSMENT FOR SAGE THRASHER (OREOSCOPTES MONTANUS ) IN WYOMING prepared by 1 2 1 REBECCA S B USECK , DOUGLAS A. K EINATH , AND MATTHEW H. M CGEE 1 Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Dept. 3381, Laramie, Wyoming 82071; 307-766-3023 2 Zoology Program Manager, Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Dept. 3381, Laramie, Wyoming 82071; 307-766-3013; [email protected] prepared for United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office Cheyenne, Wyoming December 2004 Buseck, Keinath, and McGee – Oreoscoptes montanus December 2004 Table of Contents SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 3 NATURAL HISTORY ........................................................................................................................... 4 Morphological Description ...................................................................................................... 4 Taxonomy and Distribution ..................................................................................................... 6 Habitat Requirements............................................................................................................. 8 General .............................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationships of the Starlings (Sturnidae: Sturnini) and the Mockingbirds (Sturnidae: Mimini)
    THE RELATIONSHIPS OF THE STARLINGS (STURNIDAE: STURNINI) AND THE MOCKINGBIRDS (STURNIDAE: MIMINI) CHARLESG. SIBLEYAND JON E. AHLQUIST Departmentof Biologyand PeabodyMuseum of Natural History,Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511 USA ABSTRACT.--OldWorld starlingshave been thought to be related to crowsand their allies, to weaverbirds, or to New World troupials. New World mockingbirdsand thrashershave usually been placed near the thrushesand/or wrens. DNA-DNA hybridization data indi- cated that starlingsand mockingbirdsare more closelyrelated to each other than either is to any other living taxon. Some avian systematistsdoubted this conclusion.Therefore, a more extensiveDNA hybridizationstudy was conducted,and a successfulsearch was made for other evidence of the relationshipbetween starlingsand mockingbirds.The resultssup- port our original conclusionthat the two groupsdiverged from a commonancestor in the late Oligoceneor early Miocene, about 23-28 million yearsago, and that their relationship may be expressedin our passerineclassification, based on DNA comparisons,by placing them as sistertribes in the Family Sturnidae,Superfamily Turdoidea, Parvorder Muscicapae, Suborder Passeres.Their next nearest relatives are the members of the Turdidae, including the typical thrushes,erithacine chats,and muscicapineflycatchers. Received 15 March 1983, acceptedI November1983. STARLINGS are confined to the Old World, dine thrushesinclude Turdus,Catharus, Hylocich- mockingbirdsand thrashersto the New World. la, Zootheraand Myadestes.d) Cinclusis
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Fire in Ecosystems: Effects of Fire on Fauna
    United States Department of Agriculture Wildland Fire in Forest Service Rocky Mountain Ecosystems Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42- volume 1 Effects of Fire on Fauna January 2000 Abstract _____________________________________ Smith, Jane Kapler, ed. 2000. Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on fauna. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 1. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 83 p. Fires affect animals mainly through effects on their habitat. Fires often cause short-term increases in wildlife foods that contribute to increases in populations of some animals. These increases are moderated by the animals’ ability to thrive in the altered, often simplified, structure of the postfire environment. The extent of fire effects on animal communities generally depends on the extent of change in habitat structure and species composition caused by fire. Stand-replacement fires usually cause greater changes in the faunal communities of forests than in those of grasslands. Within forests, stand- replacement fires usually alter the animal community more dramatically than understory fires. Animal species are adapted to survive the pattern of fire frequency, season, size, severity, and uniformity that characterized their habitat in presettlement times. When fire frequency increases or decreases substantially or fire severity changes from presettlement patterns, habitat for many animal species declines. Keywords: fire effects, fire management, fire regime, habitat, succession, wildlife The volumes in “The Rainbow Series” will be published during the year 2000. To order, check the box or boxes below, fill in the address form, and send to the mailing address listed below.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Protocol and Habitat Evaluation for Leconte's
    Survey Protocol and Habitat Evaluation for LeConte’s (Toxostoma lecontei) and Bendire’s (Toxostoma bendirei) Thrasher Prepared by: The Desert Thrasher Working Group Survey Protocol and Habitat Evaluation Contents Objective 3 Field Gear and Materials Checklist: 4 Conducting the Survey 6 Thrasher Survey Form 8 Target Species Sighting Form 10 Habitat Evaluation Form 12 Data entry 16 Analysis of Area Search Data: Site-Level Models 17 Appendix 1. Species Descriptions 19 LeConte’s Thrasher 19 Bendire’s Thrasher 20 Appendix 2. Training Materials 22 Appendix 3. Bird and Plant Abbreviations and Codes 25 Appendix 4. Sample Survey Form 33 Appendix 5. Sample Sighting Form 34 Appendix 6. Group Code Examples 35 Appendix 7. Sample Habitat Evaluation Form 37 Appendix 8. Invasive Plant Identification Resources. 38 Recommended Citation: DTWG, the Desert Thrasher Working Group. 2018. Survey Protocol and Habitat Evaluation for LeConte’s and Bendire’sThrashers. The Protocol Subteam with the Desert Thrasher Working Group included: Dawn M. Fletcher, Lauren B. Harter, Christina L. Kondrat-Smith, Christofolos L. McCreedy and Collin A. Woolley. Cover photo art by: Christina Kondrat-Smith 2 Survey Protocol and Habitat Evaluation Objective The objectives of these surveys are to estimate distribution, determine population trends over time, and to identify habitat preferences for Bendire’s and LeConte’s Thrashers. Recommended Survey Times: Consider local elevation and latitude when designing a survey schedule, as researchers will need to balance surveying early (which helps to minimize confusion of adults with juveniles, and which may maximize exposure to peak singing season) with surveying late (which can minimize the possibility of completely missing late-arriving, migratory Bendire’s Thrashers).
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Banding Manual, Vol. II
    MTAB 51 July 26, 1983 MEMORANDUM TO : All Banders FROM : Chief, Bird Banding Laboratory Office of Migratory Bird Management Laurel, Maryland 20708 SUBJECT : I. Tabulation of encounters 2. Computer-generated banding schedules 3. Requests for permit revisions 4. Request to not band certain birds 5. BBL slide file needs 6. Permit inactivation 7. A new bride 8. Inland Bird Banding Association meeting I. A tabulation of 1981 banding totals and 1977 banding and recovery totals of species is enclosed. These data are provided primarily to aid in research planning. We may be able to revise this report next year and ask now for suggestions from banders about what data would be most useful to them. 2. Banders may computer-produce banding schedules for the BBL. Any computer- or mini computer-generated schedules (with or without cards or tape) must be BBL-approved in advance of actual schedule submission to the BBL. 3. Please inform all subpermittees that any request for auxiliary marking authorization or changes in permits must come from the master bander. We want requests in writing, please. When requesting permits for a new subpermittee, please furnish the name of the person. We do not send out application forms with the applicant's name blank. 4. Banders are reminded not to use U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service bands on resident game birds (Sp. No. 288 through 31 1.0). Do not band parakeets, rock doves and vultures, or unidentifiable migratory birds such as Empidonax flycatchers, and certain warblers, gulls, and ducks. 5. We would appreciate slides of auxiliary markers from various projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Table and Recommended Band Sizes the Table on the Left Is from the USGS Bird Banding Laboratory
    Species Table and Recommended Band Sizes The table on the left is from the USGS Bird Banding Laboratory. If there is more than one size listed then the first one is the preferred recommended size. The table on the right may be used to find the National Band & Tag Company butt-end band style that matches the federal band size you are looking for. This Size Chart should be used as a guide only! We cannot be responsible for incorrect sizes being ordered based on this chart. Please measure your bird’s leg for accurate sizing, if you are unsure we will gladly send samples. Common Federal Federal NB&T Inside Inside Name Band Size Size Size Dia. (IN) Dia. (MM) Abert's Towhee 1A, 2, 1D 0A None .078 1.98 Acadian Flycatcher 0A, 0 0 None .083 2.11 Acorn Woodpecker 2, 3 1 1242-3 .094 2.39 Adelaide's Warbler 0A, 0 1B None .109 2.77 Adelie Penguin 9 1P None .112 2.84 African Collared-Dove 3A 1A 1242-4 .125 3.17 African Penguin 9 1D None .138 3.50 African Silverbill 0, 1C, 1 2 1242-5 .156 3.96 Akekee 1B, 1C, 1 3 1242-6 .188 4.78 Akepa 0 3B None .203 5.16 Akiapolaau 1A 3A 1242-7 .219 5.56 Akikiki 0, 1C, 1 4 1242-8 .250 6.35 Akohekohe 1A 4S 1242-8 .250 6.35 Alaska Marbled Murrelet 3B, 3 4A None .281 7.14 Alder Flycatcher 0, 0A 4AS None .281 7.14 Aleutian Canada Goose 7B 5 1242-10 .313 7.95 Aleutian Tern 2, 1A, 1D 5A None .344 8.73 Allen's Hummingbird X 6 1242-12 .375 9.53 Altamira Oriole 3 7A 1242-14 .438 11.13 American Avocet 4, 4A 7AS 1242-14 .438 11.13 American Bittern M: 7A F: 6 7 1242-16 .500 12.70 American Black Duck 7A 7B None .531 13.49 American
    [Show full text]
  • Of Bendire's Thrasher
    BREEDING HABITAT REQUIREMENTS AND TERRITORY SIZE OF BENDIRE’S THRASHER (Toxostoma bendirei) Photo taken by Cody Bear Sutton Hildago Co, New Mexico Final Report to New Mexico Department of Game & Fish Martha J. Desmond (Principal Investigator) Cody Bear Sutton (Graduate Student) Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Ecology New Mexico State University Las Cruces, NM 880 BREEDING HABITAT REQUIREMENTS AND TERRITORY SIZE OF BENDIRE’S THRASHER (Toxostoma bendirei) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................3 METHODS ......................................................................................................................................6 Study Area ........................................................................................................................6 Breeding Surveys .............................................................................................................7 Territory Mapping ............................................................................................................9 Abiotic/temporal Measurements ....................................................................................10 Territory Scale Measurements .......................................................................................10 Landscape Scale Measurements .....................................................................................11 DATA ANALYSIS .........................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • SAGE THRASHER Oreoscoptes Montanus
    A-72 SAGE THRASHER Oreoscoptes montanus Description The sage thrasher is distinguished from other thrashers by its smaller size, short and straight bill, and relatively short tail. Plumage on the upper body is drab, brownish-gray with slightly darker feathers forming indistinct streaks, particularly on the crown. The bird has a pale line behind the ear-coverts, a face pattern formed by whitish supercilium, and a whitish malar region bordered by a black streak at the sides of the throat. The wings are slightly browner than the back and have two narrow white wing-bars. The tail is browner than the rest of the body and has white tipped outer rectrices. The under-parts of the body are off-white, streaked with dark brown blotches. The bill is black with a grayish lower mandible. The plumage remains similar throughout the year but flanks appear pale cinnamon when plumage is fresh in the fall (Reynolds et al. 1999). Life history & Sage thrashers arrive on breeding grounds in March and April (Dillon 1998; behavior Reynolds et al. 1999). Breeding in Colorado typically begins in late May and early June (Dillon 1998). The birds are conspicuous during breeding through An opportunistic activity and song, but are secretive around their nests (Reynolds et al. ground forager and 1999). Adults will fly until they are within 10 meters of the nest and then shrub nester. typically travel on ground the remaining distance. During summer the sage thrasher feeds primarily on ground insects such as ants and beetles, but also feeds on other arthropods, arachnids, plant material, berries and small fruit.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds in a Sagebrush Sea: Managing Sagebrush Habitats for Bird Commu- Nities
    BBBIIRRDDSS IINN AA SSAAGGEEBBRRUUSSHH SSEEAA MANAGING SAGEBRUSH HABITATS FOR BIRD COMMUNITIES by Christine Paige and Sharon A. Ritter Partners in Flight, Western Working Group 1999 Research and writing by: Christine Paige, Ravenworks Ecology, 612 Lolo Street, Missoula, MT 59802 Revision and editing by: Sharon A. Ritter, Idaho Partners in Flight, 142 West Hills Way, Hamilton, MT 59840 Editing and layout/design by: Pam Peterson, Nongame Program, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, P.O. Box 25, Boise, ID 83725 Project funding by: USDI Bureau of Land Management, Oregon and Idaho State Offices USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1 USDA Forest Service, Regions 1 and 4 Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Nongame Program Ravenworks Ecology Acknowledgments: We would like to thank Jack Connelly, Mike Denny, David Dobkin, Randy Hill, Mabel Jankovsky-Jones, Lou Jours, Julie Kaltenecker, Steve Knick, Ron Lambeth, Peter Lessica, Paul Makela, Robert McQuivey, Chris Merker, Bob Moseley, Mike Pellant, Tim Reynolds, Terry Rich, John Rotenberry, Steve Shelly, Michael Schroeder, Chuck Trost, Helen Ulmschneider, Matthew Vander Haegen, and Brian Woodbridge for contributing information and ideas to the development of this document. We owe a special debt to our reviewers for their insightful comments and corrections on the drafts: Loren Anderson, Al Bammann, Jon Beals, Carol Beardmore, Steve Bouffard, Kathy Cheap, Mike Denny, Kim Dickerson, Kristi Dubois, Katy Duffy, Ana Egnew, Jim Hagenbarth, Neil Hedges, Gary Herron, Randy Hill, Nancy Hoffman, Gary Ivey, Bill and Nancy LaFramboise, Ron Lambeth, Tracy Lloyd, Paul Makela, Chris Merker, Alan Peterson, Joe Petzold, Charley Rains, Tim Reynolds, Terry Rich, Bill Roney, John Rotenberry, Michael Schroeder, Dan Svingen, and Helen Ulmschneider.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Report of Region-Wide Surveys in 2017-2018
    Survey methods, habitat models, and future directions for conservation of Bendire's and LeConte's Thrashers: Comprehensive report of region-wide surveys in 2017-2018. Photo by Bobby Wilcox Prepared by the Great Basin Bird Observatory, [email protected] Submitted to the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (Agreement #L17AC00185) Recommended Citation: E.M. Ammon1, D.M. Fletcher1, L.B. Harter1,C.C. Borgman2, E. Duvuvuei3, G. Geupel4, D. Jongsomjit4, E. Juarez5, C.L. Kondrat5, E. Masters6, and R. Norvell7 2020. Survey methods, habitat models, and future directions for conservation of Bendire's and LeConte's Thrashers: A comprehensive report of region-wide surveys in 2017-2018. GBBO Gen. Tech. Report 2019-1. Great Basin Observatory, Reno, NV. 1 Great Basin Bird Observatory, 2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Birds, 3 New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, 4 Point Blue Conservation Science, 5 Arizona Game and Fish Department 6 Bureau of Land Management, Arizona State Office, 7 Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Region-Wide Desert Thrasher Monitoring, Final Report by GBBO, 11/1/2019 Table of Contents Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3 Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Methods .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • American Ornithological Union (AOU) Bird Species List 1
    American Ornithological Union (AOU) Bird Species List 1 Alpha Alpha Species Code Species Code Western Grebe WEGR Glaucous-winged Gull GWGU Clark's Grebe CLGR Hybrid Gull HYGU Red-necked Grebe RNGR Great Black-backed Gull GBBG Horned Grebe HOGR Slaty-backed Gull SBGU Eared Grebe EAGR Western Gull WEGU Least Grebe LEGR Yellow-footed Gull YFGU Pied-billed Grebe PBGR Lesser Black-backed Gull LBBG Common Loon COLO Herring Gull HERG Yellow-billed Loon YBLO California Gull CAGU Arctic Loon ARLO Unidentified Gull UNGU Pacific Loon PALO Ring-billed Gull RBGU Red-throated Loon RTLO Band-tailed Gull BTGU Tufted Puffin TUPU Mew Gull MEGU Atlantic Puffin ATPU Black-headed Gull BHGU Horned Puffin HOPU Heermann's Gull HEEG Rhinoceros Auklet RHAU Laughing Gull LAGU Cassin's Auklet CAAU Franklin's Gull FRGU Parakeet Auklet PAAU Bonaparte's Gull BOGU Crested Auklet CRAU Little Gull LIGU Whiskered Auklet WHAU Ross' Gull ROGU Least Auklet LEAU Sabine's Gull SAGU Ancient Murrelet ANMU Gull-billed Tern GBTE Marbled Murrelet MAMU Caspian Tern CATE Kittlitz's Murrelet KIMU Royal Tern ROYT Xantus' Murrelet XAMU Crested Tern CRTE Craveri's Murrelet CRMU Elegant Tern ELTE Black Guillemot BLGU Sandwich Tern SATE Pigeon Guillemot PIGU Cayenne Tern CAYT Common Murre COMU Forster's Tern FOTE Thick-billed Murre TBMU Common Tern COTE Razorbill RAZO Arctic Tern ARTE Dovekie DOVE Roseate Tern ROST Great Skua GRSK Aleutian Tern ALTE South Polar Skua SPSK Black-naped Tern BNTE Pomarine Jaeger POJA Least Tern LETE Parasitic Jaeger PAJA Sooty Tern SOTE Long-tailed Jaeger LTJA
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Biology of the Sage Thrasher
    Central Washington University ScholarWorks@CWU All Master's Theses Master's Theses 1970 Breeding Biology of the Sage Thrasher John Wayne Gooding Central Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons, and the Ornithology Commons Recommended Citation Gooding, John Wayne, "Breeding Biology of the Sage Thrasher" (1970). All Master's Theses. 1337. https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/etd/1337 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses at ScholarWorks@CWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@CWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BREEDIKG BIOLOGY OF THE SAGE THRASHER A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Faculty Central Washington State College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by John Wayne Gooding August, 1970 Ll) S7 7/. .31 SP ECIAL C.QfilCTION Libnny Cc1tiral Washington State Cflllc ge Ellensburg, Washington APPROVED FOR THE GRADUATE FACULTY ________________________________ Jared Verner, COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN _________________________________ Philip C. Dumas _________________________________ Stamford D. Smith TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..... 1 Materials and Methods . • ii Results .... • 6 Dis cues ion 23 Summary ..... 28 Literature Cited .. 29 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As with most investigatione, this one wa.l!! not accomplished solely as the reeult of the author's own efforte. Thanks go to the membere of my graduate com­ mittee, Dr. JBred Verner (chairman), Dr. Philip C. Dumae and Dr. Stamford D. Smith, and also to fellow graduate students Donald F. Ma,rtin, Gary G. Beneon and Mark R.
    [Show full text]