DOCSLIB.ORG

Plantibacter Flavus Strain 251, Increased A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plantibacter Flavus Strain 251, Increased A Identification of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterial Endophytes Using Culture-Dependent In Vitro and Laboratory In Planta Methods by Evan Mayer A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Graduate Department of Cell and Systems Biology University of Toronto ©Copyright by Evan Mayer 2019 Identification of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterial Endophytes Using Culture-Dependent In Vitro and Laboratory In Planta Methods Evan Mayer Master of Science Cell and Systems Biology University of Toronto 2019 Abstract This study examined a collection of 220 bacterial endophytes isolated from herbaceous plants growing in petroleum-contaminated soils for plant growth promotion abilities. 12% of endophytes tested induced statistically significant growth benefits in Arabidopsis. The strongest plant growth promoting endophyte, Plantibacter flavus strain 251, increased A. thaliana fresh biomass and total root length by 4.7 and 5.8 times respectively over control plants and contained genes for auxin and ACC deaminase production. In vitro tests showed that 26% of endophytes from 19 different genera were potentially capable of nitrogen fixation, while 42% of endophytes from 16 different genera were capable of phosphate solubilization. Of the potential nitrogen fixers, 80% demonstrated free-living nitrogen fixation capability when grown in nitrogen-free media. None of the three endophytes tested improved Arabidopsis tolerance to drought stress. Overall, this study showed that a large variety of bacterial endophytes are capable of direct plant growth promotion. ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor, Roberta Fulthorpe, for giving me the opportunity to not just get a Master’s degree, but to also grow as a person. I feel like I have become more independent, creative, and passionate about science as a result of working with you for two years at U of T Scarborough, and I’m very appreciative of that. I would like to thank my committee members, Marney Isaac and Keiko Yoshioka, for being open with their input and providing me with the necessary tools to facilitate this research. Lastly, I would like to thank my labmates, particularly the three Patricias, for helping and entertaining me throughout the Masters. iii Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. vi List of Figures .......................................................................................................................... viii List of Appendices ...................................................................................................................... xi List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. xii Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 The Plant Microbiome ........................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Endosphere and Endophytes ......................................................................................... 2 1.3 Beneficial Functions of Plant Growth-Promoting Microbes .................................................... 4 1.3.1 Production of Phytochemicals and Phytohormones ............................................................ 4 1.3.2 Nutrient Acquisition ............................................................................................................ 5 1.3.3 Abiotic Stress Tolerance .................................................................................................... 5 1.3.4 Protection from Pathogens ................................................................................................. 6 1.4 Practical Application of Plant Growth-Promoting Microbes .................................................... 7 1.4.1 Biofertilizers and Biopesticides ........................................................................................... 7 1.4.2 Other Uses ......................................................................................................................... 8 1.5 Methods of Studying Plant Growth-Promoting Microbes........................................................ 8 1.5.1 In Vitro vs. In Vivo Methods ................................................................................................ 8 1.5.2 Arabidopsis thaliana as a Model Laboratory Plant .............................................................. 9 1.6 Research Objectives and Hypotheses ................................................................................. 10 Chapter 2: Identification of Direct Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterial Endophytes Using In Planta Screening Tests ........................................................................................................................ 12 2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Materials and Methods ........................................................................................................ 13 2.2.1 Endophyte Collection and Bacterial Culture Growth ......................................................... 13 2.2.2 Surface Sterilization of Arabidopsis Seeds ....................................................................... 13 2.2.3 In Planta Screening Tests ................................................................................................ 14 2.2.4 Statistical Analysis ........................................................................................................... 15 2.3 Results ................................................................................................................................ 15 2.4 Discussion........................................................................................................................... 19 Chapter 3: Quantification and Explanation of Direct Plant Growth Promotion by Select Bacterial Endophytes ............................................................................................................................... 21 3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 21 3.2 Materials and Methods ........................................................................................................ 21 iv 3.2.1 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing of Select Endophytes ......................................................... 21 3.2.2 In planta Tests Using Select Endophytes ......................................................................... 22 3.2.3 Statistical Analysis ........................................................................................................... 23 3.2.4 Plantibacter flavus strain 251 Genome Annotation and Search ........................................ 23 3.3 Results ................................................................................................................................ 24 3.3.1 Identification of Select Isolates ......................................................................................... 24 3.3.2 Select in planta tests ........................................................................................................ 25 3.3.3 Plant Beneficial Genes in Plantibacter flavus Strain 251 .................................................. 34 3.4 Discussion........................................................................................................................... 35 Chapter 4: Effects of Bacterial Endophytes on Plant Nitrogen Acquisition ................................. 41 4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 41 4.2 Materials and Methods ........................................................................................................ 43 4.2.1 nifH PCR .......................................................................................................................... 43 4.2.2 Growth in Nitrogen-Free Medium ..................................................................................... 43 4.2.3 Nitrogen-Limiting In Planta Tests ..................................................................................... 44 4.3 Results ................................................................................................................................ 44 4.3.1 nifH PCR .......................................................................................................................... 44 4.3.2 Growth in Nitrogen-Free Medium ..................................................................................... 45 4.3.3 Nitrogen-Limiting In Planta Tests ..................................................................................... 46 4.4 Discussion........................................................................................................................... 47 Chapter 5: Effects of Bacterial Endophytes on Plant Phosphorus Uptake ................................. 51 5.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 51 5.2 Materials and Methods .......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Corynebacterium Sp.|NML98-0116
    1 Limnochorda_pilosa~GCF_001544015.1@NZ_AP014924=Bacteria-Firmicutes-Limnochordia-Limnochordales-Limnochordaceae-Limnochorda-Limnochorda_pilosa 0,9635 Ammonifex_degensii|KC4~GCF_000024605.1@NC_013385=Bacteria-Firmicutes-Clostridia-Thermoanaerobacterales-Thermoanaerobacteraceae-Ammonifex-Ammonifex_degensii 0,985 Symbiobacterium_thermophilum|IAM14863~GCF_000009905.1@NC_006177=Bacteria-Firmicutes-Clostridia-Clostridiales-Symbiobacteriaceae-Symbiobacterium-Symbiobacterium_thermophilum Varibaculum_timonense~GCF_900169515.1@NZ_LT827020=Bacteria-Actinobacteria-Actinobacteria-Actinomycetales-Actinomycetaceae-Varibaculum-Varibaculum_timonense 1 Rubrobacter_aplysinae~GCF_001029505.1@NZ_LEKH01000003=Bacteria-Actinobacteria-Rubrobacteria-Rubrobacterales-Rubrobacteraceae-Rubrobacter-Rubrobacter_aplysinae 0,975 Rubrobacter_xylanophilus|DSM9941~GCF_000014185.1@NC_008148=Bacteria-Actinobacteria-Rubrobacteria-Rubrobacterales-Rubrobacteraceae-Rubrobacter-Rubrobacter_xylanophilus 1 Rubrobacter_radiotolerans~GCF_000661895.1@NZ_CP007514=Bacteria-Actinobacteria-Rubrobacteria-Rubrobacterales-Rubrobacteraceae-Rubrobacter-Rubrobacter_radiotolerans Actinobacteria_bacterium_rbg_16_64_13~GCA_001768675.1@MELN01000053=Bacteria-Actinobacteria-unknown_class-unknown_order-unknown_family-unknown_genus-Actinobacteria_bacterium_rbg_16_64_13 1 Actinobacteria_bacterium_13_2_20cm_68_14~GCA_001914705.1@MNDB01000040=Bacteria-Actinobacteria-unknown_class-unknown_order-unknown_family-unknown_genus-Actinobacteria_bacterium_13_2_20cm_68_14 1 0,9803 Thermoleophilum_album~GCF_900108055.1@NZ_FNWJ01000001=Bacteria-Actinobacteria-Thermoleophilia-Thermoleophilales-Thermoleophilaceae-Thermoleophilum-Thermoleophilum_album
    [Show full text]
  • Stress-Tolerance and Taxonomy of Culturable Bacterial Communities Isolated from a Central Mojave Desert Soil Sample
    geosciences Article Stress-Tolerance and Taxonomy of Culturable Bacterial Communities Isolated from a Central Mojave Desert Soil Sample Andrey A. Belov 1,*, Vladimir S. Cheptsov 1,2 , Elena A. Vorobyova 1,2, Natalia A. Manucharova 1 and Zakhar S. Ezhelev 1 1 Soil Science Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia; [email protected] (V.S.C.); [email protected] (E.A.V.); [email protected] (N.A.M.); [email protected] (Z.S.E.) 2 Space Research Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-917-584-44-07 Received: 28 February 2019; Accepted: 8 April 2019; Published: 10 April 2019 Abstract: The arid Mojave Desert is one of the most significant terrestrial analogue objects for astrobiological research due to its genesis, mineralogy, and climate. However, the knowledge of culturable bacterial communities found in this extreme ecotope’s soil is yet insufficient. Therefore, our research has been aimed to fulfil this lack of knowledge and improve the understanding of functioning of edaphic bacterial communities of the Central Mojave Desert soil. We characterized aerobic heterotrophic soil bacterial communities of the central region of the Mojave Desert. A high total number of prokaryotic cells and a high proportion of culturable forms in the soil studied were observed. Prevalence of Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Firmicutes was discovered. The dominance of pigmented strains in culturable communities and high proportion of thermotolerant and pH-tolerant bacteria were detected. Resistance to a number of salts, including the ones found in Martian regolith, as well as antibiotic resistance, were also estimated.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy and Systematics of Plant Probiotic Bacteria in the Genomic Era
    AIMS Microbiology, 3(3): 383-412. DOI: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.383 Received: 03 March 2017 Accepted: 22 May 2017 Published: 31 May 2017 http://www.aimspress.com/journal/microbiology Review Taxonomy and systematics of plant probiotic bacteria in the genomic era Lorena Carro * and Imen Nouioui School of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK * Correspondence: Email: [email protected]. Abstract: Recent decades have predicted significant changes within our concept of plant endophytes, from only a small number specific microorganisms being able to colonize plant tissues, to whole communities that live and interact with their hosts and each other. Many of these microorganisms are responsible for health status of the plant, and have become known in recent years as plant probiotics. Contrary to human probiotics, they belong to many different phyla and have usually had each genus analysed independently, which has resulted in lack of a complete taxonomic analysis as a group. This review scrutinizes the plant probiotic concept, and the taxonomic status of plant probiotic bacteria, based on both traditional and more recent approaches. Phylogenomic studies and genes with implications in plant-beneficial effects are discussed. This report covers some representative probiotic bacteria of the phylum Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, but also includes minor representatives and less studied groups within these phyla which have been identified as plant probiotics. Keywords: phylogeny; plant; probiotic; PGPR; IAA; ACC; genome; metagenomics Abbreviations: ACC 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate ANI average nucleotide identity FAO Food and Agriculture Organization DDH DNA-DNA hybridization IAA indol acetic acid JA jasmonic acid OTUs Operational taxonomic units NGS next generation sequencing PGP plant growth promoters WHO World Health Organization PGPR plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria 384 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Table S5. the Information of the Bacteria Annotated in the Soil Community at Species Level
    Table S5. The information of the bacteria annotated in the soil community at species level No. Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species The number of contigs Abundance(%) 1 Firmicutes Bacilli Bacillales Bacillaceae Bacillus Bacillus cereus 1749 5.145782459 2 Bacteroidetes Cytophagia Cytophagales Hymenobacteraceae Hymenobacter Hymenobacter sedentarius 1538 4.52499338 3 Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadales Gemmatimonadaceae Gemmatirosa Gemmatirosa kalamazoonesis 1020 3.000970902 4 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas indica 797 2.344876284 5 Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Streptococcaceae Lactococcus Lactococcus piscium 542 1.594633558 6 Actinobacteria Thermoleophilia Solirubrobacterales Conexibacteraceae Conexibacter Conexibacter woesei 471 1.385742446 7 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas taxi 430 1.265115184 8 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas wittichii 388 1.141545794 9 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas sp. FARSPH 298 0.876754244 10 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sorangium cellulosum 260 0.764953367 11 Proteobacteria Deltaproteobacteria Myxococcales Polyangiaceae Sorangium Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 260 0.764953367 12 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas panacis 252 0.741416341
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Taxonomic Novelty of Actinobacteria Isolated from The
    Diversity and taxonomic novelty of Actinobacteria isolated from the Atacama Desert and their potential to produce antibiotics Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel Vorgelegt von Alvaro S. Villalobos Kiel 2018 Referent: Prof. Dr. Johannes F. Imhoff Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Ute Hentschel Humeida Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: Zum Druck genehmigt: 03.12.2018 gez. Prof. Dr. Frank Kempken, Dekan Table of contents Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Zusammenfassung ............................................................................................................................ 2 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Geological and climatic background of Atacama Desert ............................................................. 3 Microbiology of Atacama Desert ................................................................................................. 5 Natural products from Atacama Desert ........................................................................................ 9 References .................................................................................................................................. 12 Aim of the thesis ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report on 31 Unrecorded Bacterial Species in Korea That Belong to the Phylum Actinobacteria
    Journal of Species Research 5(1):1­13, 2016 Report on 31 unrecorded bacterial species in Korea that belong to the phylum Actinobacteria Jung­Hye Choi1, Ju­Hee Cha1, Jin­Woo Bae2, Jang­Cheon Cho3, Jongsik Chun4, Wan­Taek Im5, Kwang Yeop Jahng6, Che Ok Jeon7, Kiseong Joh8, Seung Bum Kim9, Chi Nam Seong10, Jung­Hoon Yoon11 and Chang­Jun Cha1,* 1Department of Systems Biotechnology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea 2Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea 3Department of Biological Sciences, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea 4School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea 5Department of Biotechnology, Hankyong National University, Anseong 17579, Korea 6Department of Life Sciences, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju-si 54896, Korea 7Department of Life Science, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea 8Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Gyeonggi 17035, Korea 9Department of Microbiology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea 10Department of Biology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea 11Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea *Correspondent: [email protected] To discover and characterize indigenous species in Korea, a total of 31 bacterial strains that belong to the phylum Actinobacteria were isolated from various niches in Korea. Each strain showed the high sequence similarity (>99.1%) with the closest bacterial species, forming a robust phylogenetic clade. These strains have not been previously recorded in Korea. According to the recently updated taxonomy of the phylum Actinobacteria based upon 16S rRNA trees, we report 25 genera of 13 families within 5 orders of the class Actinobacteria as actinobacterial species found in Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Minimal Standards for Describing New Genera and Species of the Suborder Micrococcineae
    International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (2009), 59, 1823–1849 DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.012971-0 Proposed minimal standards for describing new genera and species of the suborder Micrococcineae Peter Schumann,1 Peter Ka¨mpfer,2 Hans-Ju¨rgen Busse 3 and Lyudmila I. Evtushenko4 for the Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of the Suborder Micrococcineae of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes Correspondence 1DSMZ-Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH, Inhoffenstraße 7B, P. Schumann 38124 Braunschweig, Germany [email protected] 2Institut fu¨r Angewandte Mikrobiologie, Justus-Liebig-Universita¨t, 35392 Giessen, Germany 3Institut fu¨r Bakteriologie, Mykologie und Hygiene, Veterina¨rmedizinische Universita¨t, A-1210 Wien, Austria 4All-Russian Collection of Microorganisms (VKM), G. K. Skryabin Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms, RAS, Pushchino, Moscow Region 142290, Russia The Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of the Suborder Micrococcineae of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes has agreed on minimal standards for describing new genera and species of the suborder Micrococcineae. The minimal standards are intended to provide bacteriologists involved in the taxonomy of members of the suborder Micrococcineae with a set of essential requirements for the description of new taxa. In addition to sequence data comparisons of 16S rRNA genes or other appropriate conservative genes, phenotypic and genotypic criteria are compiled which are considered essential for the comprehensive characterization of new members of the suborder Micrococcineae. Additional features are recommended for the characterization and differentiation of genera and species with validly published names. INTRODUCTION Aureobacterium and Rothia/Stomatococcus) and one pair of homotypic synonyms (Pseudoclavibacter/Zimmer- The suborder Micrococcineae was established by mannella) (Table 1 and http://www.the-icsp.org/taxa/ Stackebrandt et al.
    [Show full text]
  • To Obtain Approval for Projects to Develop Genetically Modified Organisms in Containment
    APPLICATION FORM Containment – GMO Project To obtain approval for projects to develop genetically modified organisms in containment Send to Environmental Protection Authority preferably by email ([email protected]) or alternatively by post (Private Bag 63002, Wellington 6140) Payment must accompany final application; see our fees and charges schedule for details. Application Number APP203205 Date 02/10/2017 www.epa.govt.nz 2 Application Form Approval for projects to develop genetically modified organisms in containment Completing this application form 1. This form has been approved under section 42A of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) Act 1996. It only covers projects for development (production, fermentation or regeneration) of genetically modified organisms in containment. This application form may be used to seek approvals for a range of new organisms, if the organisms are part of a defined project and meet the criteria for low risk modifications. Low risk genetic modification is defined in the HSNO (Low Risk Genetic Modification) Regulations: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/2003/0152/latest/DLM195215.html. 2. If you wish to make an application for another type of approval or for another use (such as an emergency, special emergency or release), a different form will have to be used. All forms are available on our website. 3. It is recommended that you contact an Advisor at the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) as early in the application process as possible. An Advisor can assist you with any questions you have during the preparation of your application. 4. Unless otherwise indicated, all sections of this form must be completed for the application to be formally received and assessed.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Diverse Mechanisms of Salicin Degradation in Populus Microbiome Isolates
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-2019 Characterization of Diverse Mechanisms of Salicin Degradation in Populus Microbiome Isolates Sanjeev Dahal University of Tennessee, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Recommended Citation Dahal, Sanjeev, "Characterization of Diverse Mechanisms of Salicin Degradation in Populus Microbiome Isolates. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2019. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/5720 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Sanjeev Dahal entitled "Characterization of Diverse Mechanisms of Salicin Degradation in Populus Microbiome Isolates." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Life Sciences. Jennifer Morrell-Falvey, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Dale Pelletier, Sarah Lebeis, Cong Trinh, Daniel Jacobson Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Characterization of Diverse Mechanisms of Salicin Degradation in Populus Microbiome Isolates A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Sanjeev Dahal December 2019 Dedication I would like to dedicate this dissertation, first and foremost to my family.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Evaluation of Four Bacteria-Specific Primer Pairs For
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Frontiers - Publisher Connector ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 28 March 2017 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00494 Comparative Evaluation of Four Bacteria-Specific Primer Pairs for 16S rRNA Gene Surveys Sofie Thijs 1*†, Michiel Op De Beeck 2, Bram Beckers 1, Sascha Truyens 1, Vincent Stevens 1, Jonathan D. Van Hamme 3, Nele Weyens 1 and Jaco Vangronsveld 1 1 Centre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium, 2 Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 3 Department of Biological Sciences, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, BC, Canada Bacterial taxonomic community analyses using PCR-amplification of the 16S rRNA gene and high-throughput sequencing has become a cornerstone in microbiology research. To reliably detect the members, or operational taxonomic units (OTUs), that make Edited by: up bacterial communities, taxonomic surveys rely on the use of the most informative Etienne Yergeau, PCR primers to amplify the broad range of phylotypes present in up-to-date reference University of Quebec, Canada databases. However, primers specific for the domain Bacteria were often developed Reviewed by: Alessio Mengoni, some time ago against database versions that are now out of date. Here we evaluated the University of Florence, Italy performance of four bacterial primers for characterizing complex microbial communities Julien Tremblay, in silico National Research Council Canada in explosives contaminated and non-contaminated forest soil and by evaluation (CNRC), Canada against the current SILVA123 database. Primer pair 341f/785r produced the highest *Correspondence: number of bacterial OTUs, phylogenetic richness, Shannon diversity, low non-specificity Sofie Thijs and most reproducible results, followed by 967f/1391r and 799f/1193r.
    [Show full text]
  • Schumannella Luteola Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Novel Genus of the Family Microbacteriaceae
    J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol., 54, 253‒258 (2008) Full Paper Schumannella luteola gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel genus of the family Microbacteriaceae Sun-Young An*, Tian Xiao, and Akira Yokota Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113‒0032, Japan (Received February 28, 2008; Accepted June 24, 2008) An actinobacterial strain KHIAT, isolated from lichen in Tokyo, was taxonomically characterized using a polyphasic approach. The isolate is a Gram-positive, anaerobic, non-motile and rod- shaped bacterium. Phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that the isolate is represented as an independent lineage distinctive from the Microbacteriaceae genera. The G+C content of DNA was 58.7 mol%. The chemotaxonomic characteristics of the isolate are cell wall peptidoglycan type (2,4-diaminobutyric acid), major cellular fatty acids (anteiso-C15:0 and iso-C16:0) and quinone type (MK-11 and MK-10). On the basis of the phenotypic and phyloge- netic distinctness, it is proposed that strain KHIAT represents a novel species in a new genus of the family Microbacteriaceae, Schumannella luteola gen. nov., sp. nov. The type strain is KHIAT (=JCM 23215T=TISTR 1824T). Key Words—Schumannella luteola gen. nov., sp. nov. Introduction butyric acid in the cell wall. Analyses of the 16S rRNA gene sequences from strain KHIAT showed that it was The family Microbacteriaceae currently contains 24 related to genera such as Leifsonia, Rhodoglobus, and genera, which are characterized by unsaturated major Salinibacterium of the family Microbacteriaceae. menaquinones (Collins and Jones, 1981) and B-type The aim of the present study is to elucidate the taxo- peptidoglycan (Park et al., 1993; Schleifer and Kan- nomic position of the isolate, using polyphasic taxon- dler, 1972; Stackebrandt et al., 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Rice Plant–Soil Microbiome Interactions Driven by Root and Shoot Biomass
    diversity Article Rice Plant–Soil Microbiome Interactions Driven by Root and Shoot Biomass Cristina P. Fernández-Baca 1, Adam R. Rivers 2 , Jude E. Maul 3 , Woojae Kim 1,4, Ravin Poudel 2, Anna M. McClung 1, Daniel P. Roberts 3, Vangimalla R. Reddy 5 and Jinyoung Y. Barnaby 1,* 1 Dale Bumpers National Rice Research Center, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Stuttgart, AR 72160, USA; [email protected] (C.P.F.-B.); [email protected] (W.K.); [email protected] (A.M.M.) 2 Genomics and Bioinformatics Research Unit, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA; [email protected] (A.R.R.); [email protected] (R.P.) 3 Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Sustainable Agricultural Systems Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA; [email protected] (J.E.M.); [email protected] (D.P.R.) 4 Rural Development Administration, National Institute of Crop Science, Wanju 55365, Korea 5 Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Adaptive Cropping Systems Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: 1-301-504-8436 Abstract: Plant–soil microbe interactions are complex and affected by many factors including soil type, edaphic conditions, plant genotype and phenotype, and developmental stage. The rice rhizo- sphere microbial community composition of nine recombinant inbred lines (RILs) and their parents, Francis and Rondo, segregating for root and shoot biomass, was determined using metagenomic Citation: Fernández-Baca, C.P.; sequencing as a means to examine how biomass phenotype influences the rhizosphere community. Rivers, A.R.; Maul, J.E.; Kim, W.; Two plant developmental stages were studied, heading and physiological maturity, based on root Poudel, R.; McClung, A.M.; Roberts, and shoot biomass growth patterns across the selected genotypes.
    [Show full text]