SAINSBURY’S STORE, FALMOUTH ROAD, PONSHARDEN, FALMOUTH LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

MARCH 2011

STRIDE TREGLOWN JOB NO. 40063 PREPARED BY IET CHECKED BY MJ DATE 31.03.2011 FILE 40063_LVIA REVISION NO. C

CONTENTS FIGURES VIEWPOINTS

1.0 Introduction 5 Figure 1 Site Location Plan 6 VP1 Viewpoint 1: Public Footpath south of Bissom Village 31 Figure 2 Falmouth OS Map VP2 Viewpoint 2: Gorrangorras Cemetery 2.0 Assessment Methodology 7 Figure 3 Photograph - Northern boundary 12 VP3 Viewpoint 3: Public Footpath south of Gorrangorras 32 Figure 4 Photograph - Southern boundary Cemetery 3.0 Baseline Survey 11 Figure 5 Photograph - Eastern boundary - Indusrial Estate VP4 Viewpoint 4: Public Footpath looking east to Ponsharden 3.1 Site Location 12 Figure 6 Photograph - Eastern boundary - Existing Store VP5 Viewpoint 5: Public Footpath south east of Bissom Village 33 3.2 Site Description 13 Figure 7 Photograph - Residential fringe VP6 Viewpoint 6: Public Footpath opposite Ponsharden 3.3 Topography 20 Figure 8 Photograph - North-eastern boundary - Jewish Cemetery VP7 Viewpoint 7: Public Footpath west of Trevissome House 34 3.4 Existing Vegetation 21 Figure 9 Existing site features and photo locations 13 VP8 Viewpoint 8: From field boundary adjacent to Trevissome 3.5 Tree Protection Figure 10 Photograph - Vospers showroom 14 Cottage 3.6 Public Rights Of Way 22 Figure 11 Photograph - Vospers rear buildings VP9 Viewpoint 9: Public Footpath south of Trevissome House 35 3.7 Environmental Constraints 23 Figure 12 Photograph - Gas works site - looking south-west VP10 Viewpoint 10: Public boat jetty opposite Ponsharden 3.8 Landscape Character Context - Natural Figure 13 Photograph - Gas works site - looking west 15 Marina England National Character Areas (NCA) Figure 14 Photograph - Existing water channel - looking west VP11 Viewpoint 11: Public Footpath west of Little Falmouth 36 3.9 Scheduled Ancient Monuments 24 Figure 15 Photograph - Existing water channel - looking east VP12 Viewpoint 12: Tregew Village - field boundary at farm shop Figure 16 Photograph - Gas works structures VP13 Viewpoint 13: Tregew Village - Private driveway 4.0 Landscape Planning Policy 25 Figure 17 Photograph - Gas works structures VP14 Viewpoint 14: Flushing Bay 37 Figure 18 Photograph - Rock face - southern boundary 16 VP15 Viewpoint 15: Falmouth Road - site entrance 5.0 Description of Proposals 27 Figure 19 Photograph - Existing trees -eastern boundary VP16 Viewpoint 16: Jewish Cemetery –looking west towards site 38 Figure 20 Photograph - Existing trees -western boundary 17 VP17 Viewpoint 17: Trescobeas facility - Recreational Ground looking 6.0 Landscape Impact Assessment 29 Figure 21 Photograph - Crib-lock retaining wall north over site Figure 22 Photograph - Internal view north 18 7.0 Visual Impact Assessment 39 Figure 23 Photograph - Internal view east Figure 24 Photograph - Internal view south 19 8.0 Proposed Landscape Mitigation 41 Figure 25 Photograph - Internal view west Figure 26 Wider contours and topography 20 9.0 Conclusions 43 Figure 27 Site contours and topography Figure 28 Photograph - open scrub 21 10.0 Appendix - Tree Survey, Constraints Analysis & 45 Figure 29 Photograph - mosses and lichens Plan Figure 30 Photograph - Marshy waterlogged land Figure 31 Photograph - Deciduous trees - central Figure 32 Photograph - Deciduous trees - eastern boundary Figure 33 Photograph - Deciduous trees - western boundary TABLES Figure 34 Photograph - Ponsharden Marina 22 Figure 35 Photograph - Public Footpath at North Parade Table 1: Sensitivity of Landscape Receptor 8 Figure 36 Photograph - Penryn River Table 2: Magnitude of Landscape Impact Figure 37 Photograph - Ponsharden Marina Table 3: Sensitivity of Visual Impact 9 Figure 38 Photograph - Ponsharden Ferry Landing Table 4: Magnitude of Visual Impact Figure 39 Adjacent Designated Sites 23 Table 5: Impact Significance Matrix Figure 40 Character Area 152 - Cornish Killas Table 6: Landscape Impact Assessment Summary 30 Figure 41 Diagram location of Jewish Cemetery 24 Table 7: Visual Impact Assessment Summary 40 and Congregational Cemetery. Figure 42 Photograph - Jewish gravestone Figure 43 Photograph - Congregational cemetery Figure 44 Zone of visual influence 30 Figure 45 Viewpoint location plan Figure 46 Diagram - Opportunities and constraints 42

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 2 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 1.0 INTRODUCTION

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 3 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 1.0 Introduction

1.1 INTRODUCTION This assessment has been carried out by Stride Treglown Landscape Architects on behalf of Sainsbury’s Food stores in order to inform and support the design of the proposed development of land to the north-west of Falmouth, situated on the A39 Falmouth Road at Ponsharden in the Carrick District, Cornwall. The site location is shown on Figures 1 and 2.

1.2 The development proposals include the provision of a new commercial unit for Sainsbury’s Food Stores including a Petrol Filling Station at the site entrance with associated car parking, access roads and new landscape proposals.

1.3 This assessment will seek to demonstrate the likely impacts and overall appropriateness of the proposals by identifying the following: • The existing landscape and visual features of the site and the opportunities and constraints that they present; • The visibility of the site and the existing contribution that it makes to the character of the surrounding area; • How the proposals respond to the opportunities and constraints presented by site.

1.4 The assessment of the existing conditions on site, photographic survey and desktop study were carried out in October and November 2010 by a Penryn qualified Landscape Architect. The report includes a review of existing baseline conditions of the site within its physical and planning policy context. The assessment of the landscape impacts will consider Flushing the existing topography, vegetation and land use  of the site. The assessment of visual impacts will consider existing visibility of the site, the contribution that it makes to the character of the surrounding area and the degree of change to the composition of views from public viewpoints.

1.5 This assessment concentrates on the landscape Falmouth and visual matters and should be read in conjunction with the other supporting information including: • Planning Supporting Statement by White Young Green • Architectural and Landscape Drawings by Stride Treglown • Design and Access Statement by Stride Treglown • Transport Assessment by Connect Consultants Figure 1 - Site Location Plan (NTS) Figure 2 - Inset Detail: Falmouth OS Map of wider area

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 4 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 5 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2.0 Assessment Methodology 2.1 This assessment has been carried out character Table 1: following guidelines outlined in the following • Potential mitigation measures to reduce Sensitivity of Landscape documents: or eliminate any adverse impacts • The significance of the residual impacts Receptor • Guidelines for Landscape and Visual after the incorporation of the mitigation Impact Assessment (Landscape measures Institute & the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (2nd 2.5 Landscape impacts relate to physical Edition 2002, Spon Press). changes to the nature and quality of the individual landscape elements and • Landscape Character Assessment characteristics on the site itself and the Guidance for England and Scotland consequential effect of these changes on (Countryside Agency & Scottish Natural the landscape or townscape character of the Heritage (April 2002). surrounding areas.

2.2 The guidelines state that there is no standard 2.6 Landscape receptors are elements or groups Table 2 : methodology for the qualification of landscape of elements which will be directly or indirectly Magnitude of Landscape and visual impacts. The methodology used affected by the proposals. These elements therefore needs to be relevant to the site consist of natural and cultural factors and Impact specific needs to be established incorporating include: a degree of professional judgement. Vegetation, topography, water courses, public rights of way, buildings, historic features and 2.3 Landscape and visual impacts will be land use and the effect these have on the considered as separate issues, where character of the site. landscape impacts relate to the physical changes to the landscape and the visual 2.7 The factors used to define the sensitivity of the impacts relate to changes in available views. landscape receptors (see Table 1) are: The scheme is likely to have effects upon the • Landscape quality – the physical state of physical landscape attributes of the site, on repair of the individual element the visual amenity of views from and towards • Landscape value – the relative the site and on the landscape or townscape importance attached to the landscape character of the surrounding areas. These element effects may be positive or negative depending • Contribution to Townscape/ Landscape on the baseline conditions of the receiving Character – contribution to the local environment. The significance of the impacts sense of place will depend upon the magnitude of the • Scope of replacement – the ability impact and the sensitivity of the landscape or otherwise to replace an individual and visual receptors (see Tables 1-5). element or group of elements • Main trends for change – the stability or 2.4 The key elements of the methodology are to level of change being experienced by the identify the following: landscape • The baseline landscape and visual resources of the site and its surroundings 2.8 The criteria for assessing the magnitude of and any important landscape or visual landscape impacts (see Table 2) are based features that may be affected by the upon the degree of physical change that proposals will occur as a result of the proposals, the • The extent to which the proposals will be compatibility of these changes with the overall visible from public viewpoints trends for change within the landscape and • The typical nature of views towards the the consequential effects that these changes site and the viewers likely to be affected may have on the landscape or townscape by the proposals character. • The sensitivity of the landscape, visual and landscape/townscape receptors • The magnitude and nature of the potential landscape and visual impacts • The consequential impacts of the proposals on the surrounding landscape

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 6 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2.0 Assessment Methodology 2.8 Visual impacts are defined by the LI/IEMA as: 2.14 The significance of the impacts is determined Table 3: ‘The changes that arise in the composition by a combination of the sensitivity of the Sensitivity of Visual Receptor of available views as a result of changes to receptor and the magnitude of the predicted the landscape, to people’s responses to changes. Therefore a substantial impact the changes and to the overall effects with will occur where both the sensitivity of the respect to visual amenity.’ landscape/townscape or viewer and the magnitude of the impact are high. 2.9 The sensitivity of visual receptors and views will be dependent on: 2.15 Definitions of impact significance are set out • The location and context of viewpoints in Table 5. • The expectations, occupation or activity of the receptor • The importance of the view

2.10 The most sensitive visual receptors include residents with views affected by the development, users of recreational facilities including Public Rights of Way whose attention or interest may be focused on the landscape including outdoor sports and Table 4 : activities, the landscape setting or valued Magnitude of Visual Impact views enjoyed by the local community, people travelling through or past the affected landscape in cars, trains and other public transport modes and people at their place of work.

2.11 Criteria used to assess the sensitivity of the visual receptors are set out in Table 3.

2.12 In evaluation of these effects on views and the visual amenity of the identified receptors, the magnitude or scale of visual change is described by reference to: • The distance of the viewpoint from the proposed development • The extent of the area over which the changes would be visible • The angle of view in relation to the main activity of the receptor • The scale of change in view with respect to the loss or addition of features in the view and changes in its composition including the proportion of the view occupied by the proposed development Table 5: • The degree of contrast or integration of any new features or changes in the Impact Significance Matrix landscape with the existing or remaining landscape elements and characteristics in term of form, scale and mass, line, height, colour and texture • The duration and nature of the effect, whether temporary or permanent, intermittent or continuous.

2.13 Criteria used to assess the magnitude of the visual effects are set out in Table 4.

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 7 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 8 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 3.0 BASELINE SURVEY

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 91 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 3.1 Site Location and Context

3.1.1 The site is situated approximately 2km to the north-west of Falmouth at Ponsharden, which lies at the entrance to the town as approaching from adjacent Penryn on the B3292 or from the adjoining A39 Falmouth Road (Fig. 3).

3.1.2 It is situated in a prominent ‘Gateway’ location to Falmouth when approached from Penryn or by the A39 which brings in through traffic from a wider area to the east (Figs. 1 - 2). This road carries high levels of traffic at peak times of day.

3.1.3 The site is bounded by agricultural land to Figure 3 - Northern boundary - Falmouth Road (A39) looking west Figure 4 - Southern boundary - Scramble track and play area looking the west, common land to the south at the south east onto Trescobeas facility Trescobeas facility including some play provision, a scramble track and sports pitch (Fig. 4), local industry to the north and east including Ponsharden Industrial Estate (Fig. 5) and the existing Sainsbury’s store which sits directly to the south-east (Fig. 6).

3.1.4 Apart from Ashfield House on the south eastern corner, the site is removed from the residential areas of Falmouth, the fringes of which begin beyond the existing Sainsbury’s store (Fig. 7) and along the road corridor to the south and east.

3.1.5 To the north the site is bounded by Falmouth Road with maritime industry such as boat Figure 5 - Eastern boundary - Ponsharden Induartial Estate looking yards, sailing schools and the Marina north Figure 6 - Eastern boundary - Existing Sainsburys store looking south located opposite along the Penryn River Estuary which contributes to the Fal Estuary. Ponsharden Ferry Landing and Park and Ride facilities are also serviced along the Penryn River directly to the north of the site.

3.1.6 There is a Jewish Cemetery (Fig. 8) and a Congregational Cemetery on the north eastern boundary corner of the site which are both overgrown and not clearly signed from the road. These are separated by a hedge bank and mature trees but are both accessed via the same gate on Falmouth Road. Both were established around 1780 and are listed with English Heritage as a Scheduled Monument. Figure 7 - Residential fringe begins to the south east of the site adjacent to the existing Sainsburys store. Figure 8 - North -eastern boundary - Jewish Cemetery 3.1.7 For photograph locations refer to Figure 9.

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 10 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 3.2 Site Description

3.2.1 The site is approximately 3.1Ha of rough LEGEND ground, open scrub and marsh land with FIG 10 dense vegetation of trees and shrubs to the south, west and eastern boundaries with a DIRECTION OF VIEW number of notable areas and features which are identified on Figure 9 and subsequent site photographs: SITE BOUNDARY Jewish Cemetery FIG 21 • The existing Vospers car showroom Congregational with associated buildings and car park – Adjacent Farmland Cemetery currently active (Figs. 10 - 11) • De-commissioned gas works and associated structures, fencing and hard Mature trees standing (Figs.12, 13, 16, 17) Open FIG 3 • Central line of predominantly mature scrub FIG 8 FIG 24 existing trees adjacent to the gas works (Fig. 13) Vospers car showroom • Water/drainage channel south of the gas and car park works (Figs. 14 - 15) • Rock face along southern and western FIG 19 boundary (Fig. 18) • Existing mature trees and vegetation Marsh/ along the site boundary ridges to the waterlogged land west and east (Figs. 19 - 20) • Existing crib retaining wall to the west (Fig. 21) FIG 11 FIG 22 3.2.2 A former stone quarry, the site itself is FIG 25 relatively flat and slopes from around 7.4m FIG 23 AOD to the front of the site to about 12.4m FIG 12 AOD to the rear of the site when viewed from Falmouth Road. FIG 17

3.2.3 The southern, eastern and western edges rise steeply to adjacent land with the south FIG 5 western corner as the highest rising to FIG 20 32.5m AOD so that the site is ‘cut in’ to the FIG 18 FIG 16 surrounding landform. These boundaries Rock face are well wooded and together with the surrounding landform create dense visual barriers around the site. FIG 6 FIG 13 3.2.4 There is site hoarding along the north edge FIG 7 bounding onto Falmouth Road (Fig. 3) and FIG 14 there is currently no public access to the Existing Existing site other than through the Vospers garage Sainsburys vegetation access road. FIG 15

Ashfield House (Private) FIG 4

Recreational land - Trescobeas facility

Figure 9 - Existing site features and photograph locations

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 11 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Existing site features

Figure 10 - Existing Vospers car showroom - front entrance Figure 11 - Existing Vospers car showroom - rear buildings

Figure 12 - De-commisioned gas works site - looking south-east

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 12 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Existing site features

Figure 13 - De-commisioned gas works site - looking west

Figure 14 - Existing channel south of gas works - looking west Figure 15 - Existing channel south of gas works - looking east Figure 16 - Gas works structures Figure 17 - Gas works structures

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 13 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Existing site features

Figure 18 - Rock face on south western boundary corner

Figure 19 - Existing trees along eastern boundary

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 14 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Existing site features

Figure 20 - Existing trees along western boundary

Figure 21 - Crib lock wall along western boundary

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 15 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Internal Views

Figure 22 - Looking north across existing site

Figure 23 - Looking south along eastern boundary

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 16 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Internal Views

Figure 24 Looking south across existing site

Figure 25 - looking west aross existing site

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 17 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 3.3 Topography

3.3.1 The topography of the wider landscape creates a series of steep to gently sloping valleys with tributaries leading to the Fal River (Fig. 26). Treluswell Bagatelle 3.3.2 The site juts into the adjacent landscape Mount Plantation at a level of around 10m AOD, with the surrounding land to the west, south and east Tregoweth rising steeply, to the highest boundary point of 32.50m AOD on the south west corner. (Fig. 27) Penryn Bissom

3.3.3 The Penryn River valley sits between the Trevissome Tregew ridge to the north which runs from Trefusis House to Tregew, dipping at Lower Tregew and rising again from Bissom to Tregoweth before Trefusis flattening up to Bagatelle Plantation to the north and Treluswell Mount to the west (Fig. 26).

3.3.4 Behind the site to the south the land rises to Higher Kergilliack and Menehay.

3.3.5 The site is cut into the surrounding landscape Higher ‘The obscuring views from the wider area to the Kergillack Beacon’ south. The main views into the site are from across the river to the north east. Falmouth 3.5.6 From the North West to where Falmouth Road joins Dracaena Avenue at the existing food store entrance the topography rises from Menehay 5.5m AOD - 11.5m AOD. Further east from the site on the A39 the land rises to a high point of 69m AOD within Falmouth town at ‘The Beacon’.

Figure 26 - Wider contours and topography Figure 27 - Site contours and topography

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 18 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 3.4 Existing vegetation

3.4.1 Vegetation within the proposal site consists of: 3.4.7 Although they occur outside of the site boundary line, there is a line of Monterey • Open scrub (Fig. 28) Cypress (Cypressus macrocarpa) at the • Marshy and waterlogged land (Fig. 29-30) existing Vospers road entrance along the farm • Deciduous woodland (Fig. 31-33) track which leads up to the elevated farmland • Shrubs and groundcover (Figs. 31-33) to the west. These are classed as Category A2 • Mature trees (Figs. 31-33) in the report, however thinning of the group is recommended to promote healthy growth. 3.4.2 At time of study the results of the Phase 1 These could potentially be affected by the Habitat Survey were unavailable. highway improvement works to be carried out to at the junction to allow for new site access. 3.4.3 An arboricultural report and tree survey was carried out on the site in September 2010 by Evolve Trees. This has identified some category A and B trees on site and directly adjacent 3.5 to it. The full report and survey is attached in Figure 28 -Open scrub land Figure 29 - Mosses and lichens Appendix 1. Tree Protection

3.4.4 The western boundary of the site rises along 3.5.1 As described above and highlighted in the the adjacent farm track and includes a cornish arboricultural report, the significant existing hedge bank with mature Category B trees trees within the proposals site are along the such as Turkish Oak (Quercus cerris) and eastern and western ridges and centrally hedge species such as Hawthorn (Crataegus along the edge of the gas works. monogyna), Buddleja and Field Maple (Acer campestre). Along the southern boundary and 3.5.2 There will be some substantial works to the above the rock face tree and scrub vegetation edges of the site by way of piled retaining provides a thick dense boundary with little walls which will have an impact on some of access and good screening of views into the site the existing trees along the boundaries. A from the south. limited number of these trees will need to be removed to accommodate the proposed 3.4.5 Along the western edge of the de-commissioned food store building and associated improved gas works runs a spine of woodland vegetation, highway works at the existing roundabout consisting of middle aged to mature tree to form the store entrance. Clear protection planting species such as Oaks (Quercus measures will be put into place to protect Figure 30 - Marshy waterlogged land Figure 31 - Deciduous trees - west of gas-works area cerris/petraea), Hazel (Corylus avellana) and trees to be retained throughout construction Sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus). Understory and replanting of lost individuals will be vegetation is also present with brambles, nettles provided. and ivy. The tree report classifies all these as C1 Category with the exception of the Sessile Oak, 3.5.3 Much of the site boundary vegetation will be which is a Category B1. retained to provide maximum screening and retain vital ecological corridors. 3.4.6 Vegetation along the eastern boundary includes mature woodland tree groups of Sessile 3.5.4 In order to mitigate the impact of any loss of and Turkey Oak along the Jewish Cemetery trees and site vegetation, new planting will boundary with understory of holly, hazel and be provided at the store frontage which will ash regeneration. Further south against Ashfield contribute to the landscape character of the house private drive along side the existing area once matured. store site boundary, the tree species change to include Austrian and Maritime Pine (Pinus nigra/ pinaster). The trees along the eastern boundary are Category A2. Figure 32 - Trees and shrubs - eastern boundary Figure 33 - Trees and shrubs - western boundary

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 19 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 3.6 Public Rights of Way

3.6.1 There are no public rights of way passing through the site; however there is common/recreational land to the south and pedestrian links to Falmouth along both sides of Falmouth Road to the north. There is also public access to the adjacent Jewish and Congregational Cemeteries, although the entrance door to them is overgrown and it is not obviously marked from the road or adjacent footpath.

3.6.2 A public footpath runs from North Parade (Figs. 34-37) - which joins Falmouth Road at the old food store roundabout along the Penryn River edge and Marina at Ponsharden (For Public Footpath locations see Fig. 39). This joins the seasonal ferry landing site opposite the site which has vital connections along the river estuary (Fig. 38).

3.6.3 There are a number of public footpaths on the opposite banks of the river which run from Penryn to Flushing and include connections to local villages and the Figure 34 - Looking west along the Public Footpath at Ponsharden Marina Cemetery at Gorrangorras (Fig. 39).

3.6.4 Falmouth Road is listed as an on-road cycle route by Sustrans (www.sustrans. org.uk).

Figure 36 - View north across Penryn River from Public Figure 35 - Public Footpath entrance from North Parade Figure 37 - Public Footpath along Ponshaden Marina Figure 38 - Ferry landing at Ponsharden Footpath

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 20 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 3.7 Environmental Constraints

3.7.1 The site location falls within the Local Plan designation of commercial/ industrial land and no actual major statutory designations apply.

3.7.2 There are two statutory rural designations within the vicinity relating to the adjacent Penryn River Estuary and the land to the north; these are an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) along the northern bank and to the east of the Marina the River is designated as a Special Area of Conservation (Fig. 39).

Figure 39 - Adjacent designated sites - taken from Magic.gov.uk 3.8 Landscape Character Context Natural England National Character Areas (NCAs)

3.8.1 At a regional scale the site appears on NCA 3.8.3 Certainly the reference to broadleaved 152 - the Cornish Killas (Fig. 40). woodland, variable field patterns with stone built Cornish hedges and sites of important 3.8.2 The key characteristics of the Cornish Killas archaeological qualities are applicable and are: (sourced from Natural England Website relevant to the site and its immediate setting. naturalengland.org.uk) • Undulating slate plateau with little 3.8.4 The site is set between the agricultural land to woodland and few hedgerow trees. the west and the maritime and water related • Numerous broadleaved wooded valleys, industrial context followed by urban fringe to varying greatly in size. the north and east. • Northern valleys generally narrow and densely wooded. In the south there 3.8.5 The agricultural landscape to the west is are drowned valleys (rias) with wide broken up with mature hedgerows and trees estuaries. giving a perception of enclosure and reduced • Rugged coastal scenery. Exposed and scale. windswept cliffs in the north with limited access to the sea, more sheltered and Visual Context wooded in the south. • Outstanding historic parks, mainly in the 3.8.6 External views into the site are restricted to sheltered valleys in the south. the north as vegetation and landform screen • Generally a dispersed settlement pattern the site from all other angles. Views into the of hamlets, farmsteads and small fishing site from the north are fairly open, aided by villages. the elevation of the site from Falmouth Road. • Variable field pattern dominated by stone- built Cornish hedges. • Important archaeological and industrial- archaeological sites.

Figure 40 - Landscape Character Context - Character Area 152 - Cornish Killas

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 21 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 3.9 Scheduled Monuments

3.9.1 The Jewish and Congregational Cemeteries are located on the north eastern boundary corner of the site and are both protected as scheduled monuments by English Heritage (Fig. 41). There are about 100 graves in the congregational site and 50 in the Jewish site.

3.9.2 The east side is defined by a mortared rubble wall, 1.5 metres high with chamfered granite coping where it stands to full height. Lower rubble walls follow the north east scarp crest and the south and west sides up to the joint hedgebank boundary with the Jewish cemetery.

3.9.3 The entrance to the cemetery is near its north- west corner in a short wall along Falmouth Road. This wall and the entrance doorway show several structural phases relating to a former building considered to have been a small funerary chapel called an ‘ohel’. Beyond this entrance area, the cemetery is defined on the west-north-west and much of the south- south-west by mortared rubble walls up to 1.25 metres high; its joint boundary with the Congregational Cemetery is a hedgebank.

3.9.4 The cemeteries have become fairly overgrown Figure 41 - Diagram illustrating location of Jewish Cemetery Figure 42 - Jewish gravestone with Hebrew inscription with the majority of the site covered by and Congregational Cemetery. mature trees and scrub vegetation. The Jewish Cemetery has an open grass area where there are both standing and displaced gravestones (Fig. 42).

3.9.5 The whole area is a scheduled monument and two of the gravestones within the Jewish cemetery have been given a Grade II listing by English Heritage.

Figure 43 - Congregational Cemetery, adjacent to Jewish Cemetery

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 22 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 4.0 LANDSCAPE PLANNING POLICY

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 23 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 4.0 Landscape Planning Policy

4.1 In addition to the Baseline Survey information 4.5 Policy 3D 4.7 Policy 3HH in Section 3.0, there are a number planning Planning permission will not be granted for Highlights awareness that new developments policies which impact on the site landscape development where it has a significant adverse should not cause unnecessary harm/ damage to and its surroundings. These are as follows: impact upon areas that provide:- wildlife corridors. (i) a green foreground or background important to the 4.2 The site is covered by the Interim Carrick character of the settlement; or 4.8 Policy 4S District Local Development Framework (ii) the most typical views of the town or village and New developments should not cause damage, (adopted 26th February 2008). Much of the best views of the surrounding countryside from or create significant impact on the setting of the planning policy for this area relates to within the settlement; or scheduled or archaelogical remains. adopted framework, but a number of “saved” (iii) an important green finger which penetrates the policies take precedent, within the adopted built up area and helps to maintain the close 4.9 Policy 4T Carrick District Local Plan (April 1998). relationship between town and country as well Where proposed development is likely to as the small scale characteristics of cornish significantly affect sites of local archaeological 4.3 On the Carrick District Council website the settlements; or importance, they should be protected, with Local Plan includes the site on the Insert (iv) an important green gap between two or more agreement with the Local Authority. Map of ‘Falmouth Urban Area’ and is partially settlements which are close to each other and in identified under ‘Employment’ as ‘ Older danger of losing their separate identity. 4.10 Policy 4U Industrial Commercial Areas’ (8D). The land Planning permission will be granted for proposals north of Falmouth Road is identified as ‘Areas 4.6 Policy 3F which through management and interpretation Where Preference is Given to Water Related Details that proposed new developments encourage and develop the cultural, recreation, Industry’ (8EE). The land to the south of the should provide sufficient new tree planting, educational and tourist potential of archaeological site is listed under ‘Recreation’ as ‘Protected and investigate potential new construction of and historic sites and monuments, subject to all of Open Space’ (10D). Cornish hedgerows. All proposals should also the following criteria being met:- where possible incorporate existing trees, and (i) no adverse impact upon the character or setting of The relevant policies are extracted below: hedgerows to increase the contribution towards the site; the local landscape. (ii) a safe means of access can be provided and the 4.4 Policy 8D approach roads can reasonably accommodate the In the areas defined on the Proposals Map additional traffic; planning permission for redevelopment (iii) parking can be provided in accordance with involving the loss of B1 and B2 uses will not approved standards be approved. Proposals for further B1 and B2 (iv) Proposals for development should provide car uses in those areas will be approved provided parking in line with the approved standards. all the following criteria are met:- (i) any retail use is confined to the sale of goods 4.11 Historically there has been a planning approval made or assembled on the premises and is granted for a Co-operative Store proposal on this ancillary to such manufacturing or assembly. site, firstly in 1997 which was renewed in 2000 any material increase in the amount of retail followed by a Reserved Matters approval in 2002. floorspace on existing retail premises not complying with this criteria, or any significant 4.12 The planning and detailing of the proposed relaxation of planning conditions regulating development has been undertaken in the light the use of such premises, will not be of all the policies described above, in order to permitted; minimise adverse landscape and visual effects. (ii) the approach roads being capable of accommodating the volume of traffic 4.13 All policy information obtained from Cornwall generated by the development and a safe Council Website: http://www.cornwall.gov.uk/ access can be provided; default.aspx?page=17396 (iii) there is no significant increase in noise, water or air pollution; (iv) parking can be provided in accordance with approved standards as set out in policy 5EA; (v) any development should respect the character of the area in terms of scale, form and materials.

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 24 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 5.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSALS

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 25 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 5.0 Description of Proposals

5.1 The new store footprint comprising 2.95 Ha will overlay the current ‘Vospers’ car sales garage buildings and de-commissioned gas works, tucked into the site along southern and western boundaries to minimise its prominence and making the most of the screening opportunities the surrounding land form provides. There will also be a petrol Filling Station at the site entrance of 0.32 Ha.

5.2 Under croft of the building would be areas of parking, with a total of 542 parking spaces providing for 484 cars, 21 parent and child, 32 disabled and 5 camper van spaces. There would also be accommodation for cycles with a gradient access shared footpath and cycle route, as well as access for maintenance and service vehicles.

5.3 The building would contain the main sales area and include WC facilities, delivery area, store, lobby, and restaurant.

5.4 The scheme proposals for the site will include substantial new ornamental planting and landscape proposals to the site frontage onto Falmouth Road. The style of planting will be deliberately exotic on the prominent access corner to the site which will reflect the style of the existing landscape on the adjacent roundabout on Falmouth Road, which includes palm-like species.

5.5 The scheme will also incorporate native planting to reinforce the existing vegetation and mature trees along the remaining associated boundaries.

5.6 As part of the design process detailed discussions have taken place with the officers at Cornwall Council regarding the development proposals. The key issues to emerge regarding the landscape were:

• Provision of a landscape buffer is desirable but not in a bund • A blank wall around the Petrol Filling Station would not be supported • The front of the development needs to reflect that this is the main gateway to the site. • Greening the highway environment is advised • Adjacent Falmouth Jewish and Congregationalist Cemeteries are to be carefully considered - there may be a planning gain in upgrading/ opening up the cemeteries to the public and some early discussions have taken place.

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 26 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 6.0 LANDSCAPE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 27 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 6.0 Landscape Impact Assessment

6.1 The development proposals would impact on development to take place, however the 6.14 Site drainage will comprise a mixture of 6.20 Land use and character are of low sensitivity landscape elements and features within of the impact of this will be kept to an absolute private, adoptable and existing private by way of landscape receptor because the site boundary and the surrounding landscape minimum. drainage systems and will be designed to majority of the existing site does not provide as follows: appropriate standards so as not to impact a positive contribution to its context. The 6.8 New soft landscape will feature primarily at adversely on local water courses. magnitude of landscape impact would be Topography the site entrance where there is opportunity moderately beneficial as the scheme will for key landscape elements to enhance the 6.15 No other water courses are understood strengthen existing land use and character in 6.2 The site benefits from its low lying position in arrival sequence. As this is a gateway location to be affected by the scheme proposals relation to relevance and context. The impact relation to the surrounding land to the west, for the entrance to Falmouth the proposals and it is assessed that the impact on water would therefore not be significant. south and east. will reflect the local styles and character. courses would not be significant; however There is potential for incorporating some this will need to be confirmed by the project Summary 6.3 Some substantial retaining features will be existing site features such as rocks and engineers. included along the eastern and southern stones reclaimed from the site construction 6.21 On reviewing the landscape receptors it boundaries in order to stabilise the usable phase. This would also reflect and reinforce Landscape Designations, Land is concluded that the overall impact on space on site. However, where possible the the style of planting established on the Use and Character landscape character, use and notable existing existing site retaining features such as the adjacent roundabout to the site. features described would not be significant. rock face on the south west corner and the 6.16 Scheduled monument: Jewish and existing Crib Lock wall to the west will be 6.9 With strategic positioning of trees and shrubs Congregational Cemeteries retained. along the northern boundary the development Although these do not lie within the site will be partially screened and its presence will outline, the cemetery boundary wall sits 6.4 Some re-grading of levels will be required at soften against the Falmouth Road boundary. against it and therefore the wall and the site entrance from Falmouth Road, and a This will have a positive impact on the associated vegetation will be retained and retaining wall with adjacent landscaped banks immediate surroundings and local landscape maintained so that the boundary is protected and ornamental plantnig will deal with the character by increasing opportunities for a from the proposals and construction process. level changes. mix of native and ornamental planting suited to coastal conditions. 6.17 The front entrance accessed from Falmouth 6.5 The proposal site will be designed to a level Road could be improved and a contribution of around 10.5m AOD: 10m AOD to the front 6.10 The sensitivity of the existing vegetation as could be made to the relevant body in order (north) and 11m AOD to the back (south) a receptor could be identified as medium/ to assist this. A new perimeter fence to the which reflects the current site profile levels. high due to the inclusion of the site boundary east boundary of the cemeteries will prevent It is intended that the building floor level will trees; however the magnitude of landscape any further vandalism which is currently Table 6 : Landscape Impact Assessment Summary ‘float’ above the car parking at 15.3m AOD. impact would be moderately beneficial apparent and will help protect them in the as the important existing features will be future. 6.6 While the site requires some alterations retained, with new trees and shrubs along with regards to levels, there will be no the northern road boundary. The impact 6.18 The land use within the site will be impacted overall impact on the surrounding area’s would therefore be of positive moderate by inclusion of the new building footprint, landform character. Although the sensitivity significance. under-croft car parking and the new Petrol of the topography as a receptor could be Filling Station to the front of the site; whereas identified as medium/high, the magnitude Public Rights of Way the current land use is limited to the Vospers of landscape impact would be neutral as Car Sales Garage. This area is identified for the alterations will be balanced by the new 6.11 There will be no direct impacts on the use of employment in planning terms and there has proposals and adjacent land form will be public footpaths in the locality or the public been a reserved matters planning consent unaltered. The impact would therefore not be access land to the south of the site. granted previously for a Co-operative store on of significance. the site approved in 2002. 6.12 The sensitivity of the public rights of way as a Vegetation landscape receptor is low because no public 6.19 Although the proposed store is of significant rights of way will be directly affected by the size, there would not be an overall change 6.7 The existing vegetation around the site proposals in physical terms. The magnitude to the landscape character in the immediate boundaries i.e. to the west, south and east of landscape impact would be neutral as the area, fitting in with the surrounding mixture will be retained and incorporated as part of scheme will provide new pedestrian links of maritime industry and commercial the landscape proposals for the site. The into the site but does not enhance or add to unit styles including the Lidl store further significant tree planting particularly to the any existing public access possibilities. The towards Penryn. The retained and reinforced east and west boundaries will be retained impact would therefore not be significant. landscape boundaries combined with a and protected as necessary where careful suitable architectural style reflecting the and considered construction methods and Water Courses light industrial and maritime nature of its the extent of any proposed retaining walls immediate surroundings will help the scheme will ensure their retention as far as possible. 6.13 The existing water channel to the south of fit appropriately into the context and character It is expected that select trees will require the Gas works site will need to be culverted/ setting typical of the local area. reduction works or removal in order for the diverted as part of the site enabling works.

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 28 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 7.0 VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 29 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 7.0 Visual Impact Assessment

7.1 The locality of the site was visited during October 2010, and a visual analysis was carried out to assess potential visual impacts of the development proposals on the surrounding landscape. The results are explored through a number of key viewpoints. These show typical views towards the site from the local area.

7.2 Impacts are identified and assessed as outlined in Section 2.

7.3 Where timescales of the scheme are referred to the definition of these are as follows:

Short term 0 - 2 years (construction and implementation period) Medium term 2 - 7 years (establishment period) Long term 7 + years (maturity)

7.4 Figure 44 shows the perceived zone of visual influence. The public footpath from North Parade along the River will have minimal 0.5 km visual impact due to the fact that it is not possible to see the site from it. Very limited views can be glimpsed from the Ferry Landing at Ponsharden where the footpath terminates.

7.5 The majority of vantage points into the site 1 km are from across the Penryn River with views south west into the site area from the public footpath on the northern river bank and from some private dwellings beyond. In some cases the new roofline, petrol filling station and frontage landscape will be apparent from 1.5 km these locations, although they will recess into the view in the medium to long term once the new planting has matured.

7.6 Overall the observation is that the closer the view points to the river the clearer the view 2 km towards the research area. While further the distance travelled out the more obscure the views become.

7.7 Figure 45 outlines the visual assessment Viewpoint locations looking into the site area which are further described in the following pages.

Figure 44 - Zone of visual influence Figure 45 - Viewpoint location plan

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 30 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 7.0 Visual Impact Assessment

7.8 Viewpoint 1: Public Footpath south of Bissom village

This view is looking south towards the site from the public footpath which lies south of Bissom Village. This is an elevated position but the site is obscured from view by landform Insert: Dwellings to the south of Bissom Village adjacent to footpath and vegetation in the foreground. The site can be located from the high ridgeline trees on the Extent of site eastern edge which would be retained and Falmouth the development would not break the existing skyline. Although the private windows on the first floor of the adjacent dwellings would have a higher vantage point (see insert) it is concluded that the sensitivity of this receptor will be low and the magnitude of visual impact to be neutral resulting in the impact not to be of significance.

Viewpoint 1: Taken looking south towards the site from the Public Footpath south of Bissom Village

7.9 Viewpoint 2: Gorrangorras Cemetery

From the lower end of the cemetery looking east over the Penryn River the site is obscured by existing vegetation in the foreground and landform in the background as well as some of the maritime industrial units along the southern banks. It is concluded that the sensitivity of this receptor will be low and Extent of site the magnitude of visual impact to be of no change resulting in the impact not to be of significance. Falmouth

Viewpoint 2: Taken looking south-east towards Ponsharden from the Cemetery at Gorrangorras

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 31 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 7.0 Visual Impact Assessment

7.10 Viewpoint 3: Public Footpath south of Gorrangorras Cemetery Extent of site The site is obscured by industrial units, existing vegetation and landform from this view point. It is concluded that the sensitivity of this receptor will be low and the magnitude of visual impact to be of no change resulting Falmouth in the impact not to be of significance.

Viewpoint 3: From northern banks of Penryn River along Public Footpath looking south-west

7.11 Viewpoint 4: Public Footpath looking east to Ponsharden Extent of site

The site is obscured by industrial units, existing vegetation and landform from this view point. It is concluded that the sensitivity Falmouth of this receptor will be low and the magnitude of visual impact to be of no change resulting in the impact not to be of significance.

Viewpoint 4: From northern banks of Penryn River along Public Footpath looking south-east

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 32 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 7.0 Visual Impact Assessment

7.12 Viewpoint 5: Public Footpath south-east of Bissom Village

The site boundary trees can be seen and it is possible that elements of the proposed roofline could just be seen over the existing conifer trees along the farm track to the Extent of site west. The maritime units in the foreground would partially screen the development and the proposed building would not break the Falmouth existing skyline. The visual impact would be limited further by using local styles and appropriate materials to recess it into context, as well as a maturing landscape frontage to Falmouth Road. It is concluded that the sensitivity of this receptor will be low and the magnitude of visual impact to be minor adverse resulting in the impact not to be of significance.

Viewpoint 5: Looking south from Public Foopath at inlet to Bissom Village

7.13 Extent of site

Viewpoint 6: Public Footpath opposite Ponsharden Penryn From this vantage point the footpath opens up allowing open views across the river through the vegetation and broken hedgerow in the foreground. The site is directly opposite and clearly visible. The development would have a high impact in the short term during construction. However the green boundaries to the site will be retained and the new store will not interrupt the skyline. Whilst the store is visible form this location it will be viewed in context with surrounding buildings which will screen it in part. The architectural form and materials will be similar to those existing in the area helping the proposal fit into its immediate context. In time the landscape will mature along Falmouth Road, screening the store frontage. The sensitivity of this receptor will be medium/high and the magnitude of visual impact is assessed to be of moderate benefit resulting in the impact to be of positive moderate significance.

Viewpoint 6: Looking south from Public Foopath accross river estuary

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 33 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 7.0 Visual Impact Assessment

7.14 Viewpoint 7: Public Footpath west of Trevissome House

Although this is not identified as a public footpath on the map, there is evidence of pedestrian path with a gap in the hedgerow connecting to the road which leads north past Trevissome House. At the time of survey the adjacent agricultural field to the west and the woodland belt along Trevissome Extent of site House boundary to the east made it difficult Penryn to use and inaccessible to most walkers. It is therefore unlikely that the site would be viewed often or regularly from this vantage. The adjacent Trevissome House would not have any views across to the site due to the surrounding trees and woodland (shown to the left of the viewpoint). It is concluded that the sensitivity of this receptor will be low and the magnitude of visual impact to be minor adverse resulting in the impact not to be of significance.

Viewpoint 7: From Public Footpath adjacent to Trevissome House

7.15 Viewpoint 8: Field boundary adjacent to Trevissome Cottage

The top floor windows and roof of this private dwelling can be seen from the site (see insert) and therefore has views overlooking the site from the south-western aspect. Viewpoint 8 is taken from the adjacent field boundary Trevissome from which the site can clearly be seen. The Cottage assumption is that the view from the dwelling would be affected by the proposals. In the Insert: View of Trevissome Cottage from site short term the impact would be medium/high Extent of site but once the new landscape onto Falmouth Road has matured the view would be improved and the building’s style will ground the scheme into context. While the new building in the landscape would be perceived, arguably this could become a beneficial effect by contributing to the maritime industrial landscape. It is therefore concluded that the sensitivity of this receptor will be medium/ high and the magnitude of visual impact to be minor beneficial resulting in the impact not to be of significance.

Viewpoint 8: From field boundary adjacent to Trevissome Cottage

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 34 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 7.0 Visual Impact Assessment

7.16 Viewpoint 9: Public Footpath south of Trevissome House

The western edge of the site is visible from this view. However the existing buildings in Extent of site the foreground will prevent the scheme form appearing unduly prominent. The style of the building will blend in with the surrounding context of maritime industrial units and will contribute to the composition of the view. It is concluded that there would be a significant effect in the short term during construction followed by medium to neutral impact as the new landscape and planting matures. It is therefore concluded that the sensitivity of this receptor will be medium and the magnitude of visual impact to be minor beneficial resulting in the impact not to be of significance.

Viewpoint 9: Looking south from Public Foopath at Ponsharden Marina

7.17 Viewpoint 10: Public boat jetty opposite Ponsharden Marina Extent of site Similar view to Viewpoint 9 although the development could have a greater impact on Viewpoint 10 due to the higher potential for public use of the boat jetty. However the location of the existing boat yard in the foreground will screen more of the proposals than in Viewpoint 9. It is therefore concluded that the sensitivity of this receptor will be medium/high and the magnitude of visual impact to be minor beneficial resulting in the impact not to be of significance.

Viewpoint 10: Looking south from Public Foopath and boat jetty at Ponsharden Marina

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 35 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 7.0 Visual Impact Assessment

7.18 Viewpoint 11: Public Footpath west of Little Falmouth

Through existing vegetation in the foreground this location offers screened views of western edge of the site. The development could interrupt the view on this corner, however the Extent of site view to open countryside beyond the site’s western boundary would not be affected. Falmouth Also the existing building in the foreground will reduce the impact of the development on this view. It is concluded that there would be an effect on the view in the short term during construction followed by neutral impact in medium to long term as the new planting along Falmouth Road matures. It is therefore concluded that the sensitivity of this receptor will be medium and the magnitude of visual impact to be minor adverse resulting in the impact not to be of significance.

Viewpoint 11: From Public Footpath at Little Falmouth looking west

7.19 Viewpoint 12: Tregrew Village – field boundary at Farm Shop

This viewpoint although accessible to the public is not likely to be viewed often Extent of so although the site and development, site particularly the construction phase, would be visible from here the effect would become Extent of neutral within the medium term. It is therefore site concluded that the sensitivity of this receptor will be low and the magnitude of visual impact to be neutral resulting in the impact not to be of significance.

7.20 Viewpoint 13: Tregrew Village – Private drive

Existing vegetation in the foreground obscures views to the site from this private dwelling driveway and it is therefore concluded that the sensitivity of this receptor will be low and the magnitude of visual impact to be negligible adverse resulting in the impact not to be of significance.

Viewpoint 12: From Tregrew Village - field boundary at Farm Shop Viewpoint 13: Tregrew Village - private driveway

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 36 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 7.0 Visual Impact Assessment

7.21 Viewpoint 14: Flushing Bay – looking west

The site is visible from this location although the marina and industrial buildings in the Extent of site foreground obscure it. The roof line would be visible from this angle and would form part of the backdrop to the composite view of maritime industrial buildings and sailing boats. There would be some impact in the short term during construction, although in the medium to long term the new vegetation combined with the retention of the eastern soft edge will help the scheme blend with the surrounding context. It is therefore concluded that the sensitivity of this receptor will be medium and the magnitude of visual impact to be minor adverse resulting in the impact not to be of significance.

Viewpoint 14: From Flushing bay looking west

Viewpoint 15: Falmouth Road – site 7.22 entrance Extent of site

This view is from the opposite side of Falmouth Road looking directly at the site as approaching from Penryn where the full impact of construction activities would be clearly visible. The impact would be high in the short term although the existing view itself is not particularly good quality and parts of the site are clearly derelict. In the medium to long term the scheme would be expected to improve legibility and mark the entrance to Falmouth Town to the east, becoming a beneficial effect by improving the environment and character of this section of Falmouth Road. The planting scheme at the store frontage will further provide an improved environment and visual quality to the pedestrian footpath along Falmouth Road. It is therefore concluded that the sensitivity of this receptor will be medium and the magnitude of visual impact to be moderate beneficial resulting in the impact to be of positive moderate significance.

Viewpoint 15: Perspective of Falmouth Road looking south east from the roundabout

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 37 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 7.0 Visual Impact Assessment Summary

7.23 Viewpoint 16: Jewish Cemetery – looking 7..25 Of the 17 viewpoints identified and assessed west towards site 15 recorded the visual impact of development to be not significant (VP1-5, 7-14, 16-17). This view is taken from the north eastern 2 recorded the visual impact of development to boundary corner within the Jewish Cemetery be positive moderately significant (VP 6 +15). looking towards the site. The current Vospers garage is clearly visible from this view and 7.26 Where the viewpoints have been concluded the new store would therefore also be visible. to have a positive impact on the view this is Although the store would change the view based on the proposal that the building will be it would not change the overall composition generally more interesting than those around and by including new native shrub panting it, will use high quality materials and will along the cemetery wall boundary this would include vernacular detailing and materials. This Vospers be improved in the medium to long term. It is combined with a strong landscape frontage therefore concluded that the sensitivity of this and the beneficial impact of developing a site receptor will be medium and the magnitude which has remained derelict for years will help to of visual impact to be minor adverse resulting regenerate the area. in the impact not to be of significance.

Viewpoint 16: From Jewish Cemetery looking west across site

7.24 Viewpoint 17: Recreational Ground – looking north over site

This view is from the public access land to the south and provides a vantage point over Extent of site the site from high ground. While the new proposed store footprint will occupy the view the recessed aspect of the site would still allow wider views across the estuary and would therefore not interrupt the visual amenity of the wider views across the river and to the AONB land beyond. It is therefore concluded that the sensitivity of this receptor will be medium and the magnitude of visual impact to be minor adverse resulting in the impact not to be of significance. Table 7 : Visual Impact Assessment Summary

Viewpoint 17: Looking North towards River from recreational ground edge

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 38 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 8.0 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE MITIGATION

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 39 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 8.0 Proposed Landscape Mitigation

8.1 New planting to the Falmouth Road boundary, responding 8.10 Furthermore the style of the building and chosen materials will to existing landscape features in the area e.g. the adjacent not only help limit the visual impact but will respond to local roundabout and the inclusion of existing site landscape features maritime setting meaning the proposal would not be seen will all contribute to creating a ‘Gateway’ and arrival feature as out of context or unduly prominent within the surrounding which forms part of the overall design concept where the landscape. landscape is an asset to the appearance and setting of the new building. 8.11 Issues with lighting at night are dealt with in a separate report prepared by WYG Environment which concluded there were 8.2 The building and its landscape setting have been considered no significant adverse effects on any receptors. In addition it together in the context of the Cornish Killas Landscape advised that the implementation of the proposed lighting design Character area and its key characteristics. ensured that sky glow and surface luminance levels from the development would have no significant impact on the AONB. 8.3 The existing trees and shrubs to the perimeter and boundaries of the site are to be fully retained, with the exception of a select few whose removal will facilitate the new store access road. This will maintain the existing natural screening of the site from the west, south and east, aided by landform.

8.4 Additional planting will strengthen the northern boundary, reducing the more permeable views into the site across the river which will be reduced as the landscape matures.

8.5 The frontage planting scheme will use a careful mix of high impact ornamental shrubs and suitable species which will reflect the local character and style while supporting local ecology.

8.6 The frontage retaining wall along Falmouth Road will reflect the vernacular style of the area and where possible local construction methods and materials will be applied. To help soften the edge of the predominantly hard roadway a landscape margin against the public footpath edge along with climbers, trees and shrubs and groundcovers will be incorporated.

8.7 During the construction phase of the project the existing vegetation identified to be of importance will be protected throughout to BS 5837:2005 ‘Trees in Relation to Construction’.

8.8 Hoarding will be used along sensitive site boundaries (north) to further reduce the visual impact of the construction and implementation phases.

8.9 The retention of the boundary planting combined with the additional planting of new trees and shrubs to the frontage will help mitigate and partially screen the new building to the more open views across to the site from the north. Striking species will be concentrated on the corner of the site to accentuate the ‘Gateway’ effect and to complement the existing planting on the adjacent roundabout. Species will generally be chosen to reflect those existing locally or which are suitable to the location and climate to help blend the planting and the scheme into its surroundings.

Figure 46 - Opportunities and constraints diagram

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 40 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 9.0 CONCLUSIONS

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 41 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 9.0 Conclusions

9.1 Through the site study, analysis and completion of the LVIA report the resulting information confirms that the development site is not covered by any national, statutory or local landscape designations.

9.2 The visual analysis demonstrates that the site is set in a mixture of agricultural, rural and maritime industrial contexts which, due to the site’s surrounding topography and dense boundary planting, has a highly restricted visual envelope. Views to the site from wider and public accessed land to the south, east and west are limited.

9.3 The viewpoints identified in Section 7 show that the public views into the site are mainly from the north across the Penryn River and only occur on limited locations along the public footpath where vegetation is reduced to allow for views across. Further to this there are some private dwellings which overlook the site, the most prominent being Trevissome Cottage. There are also some limited views from the southern aspect of dwellings along the footpath at Bissom Village.

9.4 Where the store would be visible, it would be seen with the existing development in the foreground, which screens the development in part. In addition, the development does not interrupt the skyline which is a significant benefit when considering the prominence of the building in its context. Moreover, the architectural form and materials proposed will be similar to existing buildings in the immediate area and as such the proposal would not be out of context or unduly prominent.

9.5 Significant feature planting along the site’s northern boundary will form part of the design concept to create a feature ‘Gateway’ landscape at the store entrance. This will subsequently mature to provide suitable screening of the development which would reduce the visual impact of the scheme to affected views from the north in the medium to long term. The scehme will also contribute to an improved environment along the Falmouth Road.

9.6 The building style along Falmouth Road frontage will reflect the local context of maritime industrial buildings and will be in keeping with the local character. This will avoid unsuitable and adverse impacts and create a positive and acceptable appearance within the local industrial character.

9.7 This assessment has explored the likely landscape and visual impacts arising from the proposed development of this new food store building and associated facilities to serve local communities. As a result it is concluded that the development could be implemented without any significant long-term adverse impacts being imposed on the local landscape and its character. In addition, the new landscape and proposals will provide a beneficial improvement to the local environment along Falmouth Road and will have a long -term screening and effect.

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 42 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 10.0 APPENDIX 1: TREE SURVEY, CONSTRAINTS AND ANALYSIS PLAN

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 43 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 44 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 45 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 46 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 47 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 48 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 49 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 50 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 51 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Bristol Manchester Promenade House Commercial Wharf The Promenade 6 Commercial Street Clifton Down Manchester M15 4PZ Bristol BS8 3NE T: 0161 832 9460 T: 0117 974 3271 F: 0161 839 0424 F: 0117 974 5207 Plymouth Bath Norbury Court St George’s Lodge The Millfields 33 Oldfield Road Plymouth PL1 3LL Bath, BA2 3NE T: 01752 202088 T: 01225 466 173 F: 01752 202089 F: 01225 428 492 Reading Cardiff University of Reading Ocean House Building L044, Ocean Way London Road, Cardiff CF24 5PE Reading, RG1 5AQ T: 029 2043 5660 T: 01872 241300 F: 029 2047 0422 F: 01872 275560 London Truro 3 Cosser Street 55 Lemon Street London SE1 7BU Truro TR1 2PE T: 020 7401 0700 T: 01872 241300 F: 020 7401 0701 F: 01872 275560

stridetreglown.co.uk

SAINSBURY’S FALMOUTH 52 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT