DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategic Analysis of Aquatic Plant Management in Wisconsin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategic Analysis of Aquatic Plant Management in Wisconsin Strategic Analysis of Aquatic Plant Management in Wisconsin Photo Credits (horizontal from top-left): Paul Skawinski, Robert Korth, Jennifer Hauxwell, Richard Hurd, Alex Block, Paul Skawinski, Chuck Druckrey, Alison Mikulyuk Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources June 2019 Contributing Authors Chelsey Blanke, Alison Mikulyuk, Michelle Nault, Scott Provost, Carroll Schaal, Scott Van Egeren, and Meghan Williams (DNR Environmental Management Division — Water Quality Program); Adam Mednick (DNR External Services Division — Environmental Analysis and Sustainability) Acknowledgements Fifty-three individual stakeholders and partners participated in interviews that informed this strategic analysis, as described in Chapter 6. A number of DNR staff assisted or advised on various aspects of the analysis. These include: Shelly Allness, Tim Asplund, Raechelle Belli, Jennifer Bergman, Kelsey Brown, Paul Cunningham, John Dougherty, Kevin Doyle, Michala Feigal, Kristina Femal, Jason Fleener, Mary Gansberg, Kevin Gauthier Sr., Susan Graham, Jason Granberg, Mark Hazuga, Craig Helker, Dan Helsel, Nathan Holoubek, Ted Johnson, Kelly Kearns, Lisie Kitchel, Susan Knight, Ty Krajewski, Gina LaLiberte, Aaron Marti, Ashleigh McCord, Robin McLennan, Brenda Nordin, James Pardee, Jordan Petchenik, Craig Roberts, Greg Sass, Alex Smith, Laura Stremick-Thompson, Pamela Toshner, Scott Toshner, Michael Vogelsang, Kelly Wagner, Carol Warden, Weston Wegener, and Michele Witecha. Nine members of a department-organized aquatic plant management (APM) study group, consisting of non-department stakeholders, reviewed and provided helpful feedback and comments on a preliminary draft. These include: Vanessa Brotske, Roy Carlson, Dale Dressel, Charlie Handel, Barb Gajewski, Eddie Heath, Jeff Mason, Dave Zelinger, and Jerry Ziegler. To the Reader This document is a strategic analysis of aquatic plant management (APM) in Wisconsin, as authorized under s. NR 150.10 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code, consistent with s. 1.11(2)(e) and (h) of Wisconsin Statutes and the Wisconsin Environmental Policy Act. The analysis addresses topics of interest identified through a public scoping process. The purpose of this and other strategic analyses is to inform decision-makers and the public of alternative courses of action and the anticipated effects of these alternatives on the quality of the human environment. Strategic analyses rely in part on the professional judgement and expertise of subject area specialists within the department. They are not intended to be exhaustive scientific studies and do not advocate for particular alternatives. The strategic analysis document summarizes current information on APM, including known and possible environmental impacts, applicable regulations, economic considerations, and potential alternative approaches for the future. It does not establish department policy for the review of specific APM projects or proposals. Rather, it is intended to serve as an informational resource to help decision- makers and the public to better understand the topic, and to aid in the crafting of future policy. The scope of the analysis was limited to APM. This includes APM for controlling aquatic invasive plant species (AIS) but does not include AIS prevention, such as boater outreach and education. AIS prevention is covered by the Wisconsin Aquatic Invasive Species Management Plan, which will be finalized and released sometime in 2019 (visit https://dnr.wi.gov/topic/invasives for updates). Although much of the strategic analysis focused on lakes, APM activities are conducted in a variety of environments, including wetlands, marinas, shoreline areas and stream banks, right-of-ways, private and non-private ponds, and areas of exposed lakebed, among others. Many of the concepts described in this document apply to APM in these and other semi-aquatic or ‘wet’ environments. The department initiated this strategic analysis in September of 2016. A public comment period on the proposed scope of the analysis was held from October 18 through November 16, 2016 with comments received from 20 individuals. Sources of information used to conduct the analysis included interviews with stakeholders, department staff, tribal representatives and other states’ natural resource agencies, as well as scientific literature, APM codes and statutes, and personal/historical experience of APM in the state. As part of the analysis, a list of management alternatives was developed for consideration and discussion by APM stakeholders and decision-makers (see Chapter 8). The department also organized an APM Study Group consisting of nine non-department APM stakeholders, who reviewed and provided input on a preliminary draft of the analysis. Their feedback has been incorporated into this document with the aim of being as factual, objective, and inclusive of various considerations as possible. The department sought public input on a draft of this document between December 11, 2018 and January 25, 2019 and received public comments from 45 individuals and organizations, as well as the Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission. A summary of the comments received, along with the department’s responses, can be found in the response to public comments document. Strategic Analysis of Aquatic Plant Management Page ii Table of Contents To the Reader ................................................................................................................................................ ii Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. vii List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................... vii Glossary ...................................................................................................................................................... viii Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ x Common and Scientific Names of Species in this Report ............................................................................ xi Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... xiv 1. Legal Authority for Aquatic Plant Management in Wisconsin .............................................................. 1 1.1. Statutory Authority ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Administrative Rules ................................................................................................................. 2 1.3. Related Authority and Policy..................................................................................................... 4 1.4. Wild Rice ................................................................................................................................... 5 1.5. Discussion .................................................................................................................................. 6 2. Aquatic Plant Management in Wisconsin – Past and Present .............................................................. 8 2.1. History of Aquatic Herbicide Use .............................................................................................. 8 2.2. Non-Chemical Approaches and Integrated Pest Management .............................................. 14 2.3. DNR Staff Workload ................................................................................................................ 17 2.4. Strategic Management and Research ..................................................................................... 17 2.5. Data Management and Accessibility ....................................................................................... 18 2.6. DNR Grants and Aquatic Plant Management.......................................................................... 19 3. Aquatic Plant Management Beyond Lakes and Ponds ....................................................................... 21 4. Economic Considerations .................................................................................................................... 23 4.1. Costs ........................................................................................................................................ 23 4.2. Benefits ................................................................................................................................... 26 4.3. Distribution and Opportunity Costs ........................................................................................ 29 5. Aquatic Plant Management Stakeholders and Collaborators ............................................................. 31 6. Stakeholder Views on Aquatic Plant Management ............................................................................ 34 6.1. Stakeholder Interview Process ................................................................................................ 34 Strategic Analysis of Aquatic Plant Management Page iii 6.2. Interview Findings ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fecundity of a Native Herbivore on Its Native and Exotic Host Plants and Relationship to Plant Chemistry
    Aquatic Invasions (2017) Volume 12, Issue 3: 355–369 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2017.12.3.09 Open Access © 2017 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2017 REABIC Special Issue: Invasive Species in Inland Waters Research Article Fecundity of a native herbivore on its native and exotic host plants and relationship to plant chemistry Michelle D. Marko1,2,* and Raymond M. Newman1 1Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA 2Biology Department, Concordia College, Moorhead, MN 56562, USA *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Received: 2 November 2016 / Accepted: 28 August 2017 / Published online: 20 September 2017 Handling editor: Liesbeth Bakker Editor’s note: This study was first presented at the special session on aquatic invasive species at the 33rd Congress of the International Society of Limnology (SIL) (31 July – 5 August 2016, Torino, Italy) (http://limnology.org/meetings/past-sil-congress/). This special session has provided a venue for the exchange of information on ecological impacts of non-native species in inland waters. Abstract The host range expansion of the specialist milfoil weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei, from the native Myriophyllum sibiricum (northern watermilfoil) to invasive M. spicatum (Eurasian watermilfoil) is one of the few examples of a native insect herbivore preferring, growing and surviving better on a nonindigenous host plant than it does on its native host plant. The milfoil weevil’s preference for the nonindigenous plant can be induced during juvenile development or through exposure to Eurasian watermilfoil as an adult. We evaluated how the fecundity of the milfoil weevil was affected over time by juvenile and adult exposure to the native, invasive and invasive × native hybrid milfoils and whether fecundity was correlated with host plant quality.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records for Euhrychiopsis Lecontei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Their Densities in Wisconsin Lakes
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 30 Number 4 - Winter 1997 Number 4 - Winter Article 4 1997 December 1997 New Records for Euhrychiopsis Lecontei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Their Densities in Wisconsin Lakes Laura L. Jester University of Wisconsin Michael A. Bozek University of Wisconsin Sallie P. Sheldon Kent State University Daniel R. Helsel Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Jester, Laura L.; Bozek, Michael A.; Sheldon, Sallie P.; and Helsel, Daniel R. 1997. "New Records for Euhrychiopsis Lecontei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Their Densities in Wisconsin Lakes," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 30 (3) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol30/iss3/4 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Jester et al.: New Records for <i>Euhrychiopsis Lecontei</i> (Coleoptera: Curcul 1997 THE GREAT lAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 169 NEW RECORDS FOR EUHRYCHIOPSIS LECONTEI (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAEj AND THEIR DENSITIES IN WISCONSIN LAKES Laura L. Jester 1, Michael A. Bozek 1, Sallie P. Sheldon2 and Daniel R. Helsei3 ABSTRACT The native aquatic weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei is currently being re­ searched as a potential biological control for the exotic aquatic macrophyte Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum), yet little is known about its specific distribution in North America. In this study, E. lecontei was collected in 25 of 27 lakes surveyed for the weevil in Wisconsin, greatly increasing the known distribution of the species in this state.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team Biological Control of Invasive
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States Roy Van Driesche Bernd Blossey Mark Hoddle Suzanne Lyon Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2002-04 Department of Service August 2002 Agriculture BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES Technical Coordinators Roy Van Driesche and Suzanne Lyon Department of Entomology, University of Massachusets, Amherst, MA Bernd Blossey Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Mark Hoddle Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, USDA, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the authors of the individual chap- We would also like to thank the U.S. Depart- ters for their expertise in reviewing and summariz- ment of Agriculture–Forest Service, Forest Health ing the literature and providing current information Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West on biological control of the major invasive plants in Virginia, for providing funding for the preparation the Eastern United States. and printing of this publication. G. Keith Douce, David Moorhead, and Charles Additional copies of this publication can be or- Bargeron of the Bugwood Network, University of dered from the Bulletin Distribution Center, Uni- Georgia (Tifton, Ga.), managed and digitized the pho- versity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, (413) tographs and illustrations used in this publication and 545-2717; or Mark Hoddle, Department of Entomol- produced the CD-ROM accompanying this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Active Space of the Milfoil Weevil, Euhrychiopsis Lecontei Dietz (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)
    J Insect Behav (2011) 24:264–273 DOI 10.1007/s10905-010-9252-6 Visual Active Space of the Milfoil Weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei Dietz (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Justin L. Reeves & Patrick D. Lorch Revised: 22 November 2010 /Accepted: 13 December 2010 / Published online: 8 January 2011 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 Abstract Euhrychiopsis lecontei Dietz (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a native weevil, is used as a biological control agent for the invasive aquatic macrophyte, Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.). Because E. lecontei over- winters on land in the adult stage and must find plants in lakes each spring, plant finding behaviors are essential to eventually understanding and predicting long term biological control. Our research showed that E. lecontei is visually attracted to M. spicatum at up to 17.5 cm, and is more attracted to plants than other visual stimuli within 15 cm. We also showed that turbidity may affect visual plant finding at 15 cm. Using available data from this and other previous studies involving chemical cues and other life history traits, we propose a testable conceptual model for how E. lecontei finds plants each year, especially while underwater. This model may also be used to explain plant finding by aquatic phytophagous insects in general. Keywords Biological control . aquatic . host location . vision . behavior . insect Introduction The native, aquatic milfoil weevil (Euhrychiopsis lecontei Dietz; Coleoptera: Curculionidae; body length ∼2 mm), is a promising biological control agent for the highly invasive macrophyte, Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.; Sheldon and Creed 1995; Newman 2004). Since the introduction of M. spicatum to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Euhrychiopsis Lecontei)
    The geographic distribution of the aquatic milfoil weevil (Euhrychiopsis lecontei) and factors influencing its density in Wisconsin lakes BY LAURAL. JESTER Wisconsin Cooperative Fishery Research Unit A Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In Natural Resources College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin Stevens Point, Wisconsin October 1998 APPROVED BY THE GRADUATE COMMITTEE OF: . of Fisheries Committee Chair Dr. Robert Freckmann Professor of Biology -~ vJ, ft.df!izc,ytko Professor of Water Resources Mr. Daniel Helsel Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources ABSTRACT The exotic aquatic macrophyte, Eurasian ,._,atermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.) has invaded waterbodies throughout the United States and Canada and become a nuisance plant. Euhrychiopsis lecontei (Dietz), a native aquatic weevil has been associated with natural declines ofM spicatum and has the potential to be used as a biological control agent. The objectives of this study were I) to determine the geographic distribution of E. lecontei in Wisconsin lakes with M spicatum, and 2) to assess geographical and limnological characteristics associated with E. lecontei presence or absence and abundance. M spicatum beds in 46 lakes were surveyed to determine the presence or absence of E. lecontei. E. lecontei distribution was found to be widespread across the state with 45 new records identified in lakes with M spicatum. Relations between lake and macroph)te characteristics and E. lecontei abundance were assessed in 31 lakes. E. lecontei densities were determined by collecting a total of 120 milfoil stems per lake and counting E. lecontei on each stem. E. lecontei densities varied from 0.0 to 2.5 weevils per stem across the lakes and varied among individual M spicatum beds within the lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae, Brachyceridae, Curculionidae) of the Prairies Ecozone in Canada
    143 Chapter 4 Weevils (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae, Brachyceridae, Curculionidae) of the Prairies Ecozone in Canada Robert S. Anderson Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1P 6P4 Email: [email protected] Patrice Bouchard* Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0C6 Email: [email protected] *corresponding author Hume Douglas Entomology, Ottawa Plant Laboratories, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Building 18, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1A 0C6 Email: [email protected] Abstract. Weevils are a diverse group of plant-feeding beetles and occur in most terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. This chapter documents the diversity and distribution of 295 weevil species found in the Canadian Prairies Ecozone belonging to the families Dryophthoridae (9 spp.), Brachyceridae (13 spp.), and Curculionidae (273 spp.). Weevils in the Prairies Ecozone represent approximately 34% of the total number of weevil species found in Canada. Notable species with distributions restricted to the Prairies Ecozone, usually occurring in one or two provinces, are candidates for potentially rare or endangered status. Résumé. Les charançons forment un groupe diversifié de coléoptères phytophages et sont présents dans la plupart des écosystèmes terrestres et dulcicoles. Le présent chapitre décrit la diversité et la répartition de 295 espèces de charançons vivant dans l’écozone des prairies qui appartiennent aux familles suivantes : Dryophthoridae (9 spp.), Brachyceridae (13 spp.) et Curculionidae (273 spp.). Les charançons de cette écozone représentent environ 34 % du total des espèces de ce groupe présentes au Canada. Certaines espèces notables, qui ne se trouvent que dans cette écozone — habituellement dans une ou deux provinces — mériteraient d’être désignées rares ou en danger de disparition.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of an Aquatic Weevil, Euhrychiopsis Lecontei, As A
    Use of an aquatic weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei, as a biological control agent against Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) in Michigan’s Les Cheneaux Islands. A study sponsored by the Les Cheneaux Watershed Council R.A. Smith Chair, Water Ecology January, 2010 Use of an aquatic weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei (Dietz), as a biological control agent against Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) in Michigan’s Les Cheneaux Islands. R.A. Smith Summary. An aquatic weevil (Euhrychiopsis lecontei) was used for biological control of the highly invasive Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) in Cedarville Bay, a shallow, protected harbor of the Les Cheneaux Islands located in northern Lake Huron. The density and vigor of Eurasian watermilfoil (EWM) was quantified for two years following the introduction of E. lecontei in 2007. Program success criteria included reduction of EWM density and re-growth of native macrophytes. Fourteen months following E.lecontei introduction, a decrease of eighty-five to ninety-five percent in EWM growth was observed at both test sites. Native macrophytes began to grow in voids where they could not previously compete against the invasive EWM. Presence of a native E. lecontei population was a probable factor in successful EWM control in this project. Primary goals of the Les Cheneaux Watershed Council have been achieved by the use of E. lecontei to control EWM growth in Cedarville Bay: EWM presence has been significantly reduced, native macrophytes are again present and recreational boaters can now transit portions of the bay that were minimally navigable prior to this study. The Council will continue to monitor EWM growth and re-growth of macrophyte species in the project test areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Prioritizing Management of Non-Native Eurasian Watermilfoil Using Species Occurrence and Abundance Predictions
    diversity Article Prioritizing Management of Non-Native Eurasian Watermilfoil Using Species Occurrence and Abundance Predictions Alison Mikulyuk 1,* , Catherine L. Hein 1, Scott Van Egeren 2, Ellen Ruth Kujawa 3 and M. Jake Vander Zanden 4 1 Bureau of Water Quality, Division of Environmental Management, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 101 S Webster Street., Madison, WI 53707, USA; [email protected] 2 Bureau of Water Quality, Division of Environmental Management, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 107 Sutliff Avenue, Rhinelander, WI 54501, USA; [email protected] 3 Bureau of Science Services, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 2801 Progress Road, Madison, WI 53716, USA; [email protected] 4 Center for Limnology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 680 N Park Street, Madison, WI 53706, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 11 August 2020; Accepted: 19 September 2020; Published: 13 October 2020 Abstract: Prioritizing the prevention and control of non-native invasive species requires understanding where introductions are likely to occur and cause harm. We developed predictive models for Eurasian watermilfoil (EWM) (Myriophyllum spicatum L.) occurrence and abundance to produce a smart prioritization tool for EWM management. We used generalized linear models (GLMs) to predict species occurrence and extended beta regression models to predict abundance from data collected on 657 Wisconsin lakes. Species occurrence was positively related to the nearby density of vehicle roads, maximum air temperature, lake surface area, and maximum lake depth. Species occurrence was negatively related to near-surface lithological calcium oxide content, annual air temperature range, and average distance to all known source populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurasian Watermilfoil
    6 EURASIAN WATERMILFOIL R. L. Johnson1 and B. Blossey2 1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA 2 Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA PEST STATUS OF WEED Eurasian watermilfoil, Myriophyllum spicatum L., (Fig. 1) is a submersed aquatic plant that has become a major aquatic nuisance throughout much of North America. Plants are rooted at the lake bottom and grow rapidly creating dense canopies (Aiken et al., 1979). Eurasian watermilfoil is able to form dense beds (Fig. 2) with stem densities exceeding 300/m2 in shallow water (Aiken et al., 1979). Plants typically grow in water depths of 1 to 4 m, but have been found growing in water as deep as 10 m (Aiken et al., 1979). Conventional control efforts have been unsuccessful in providing more than short-term relief. Herbicide applications may suppress regrowth from as little as six weeks or up to one year (Aiken et al., 1979), but have considerable non-target effects (e.g., fish kills, increased algal growth, water supply contamination, Figure 1. Eurasian watermilfoil plant. Cornell University Research Ponds, Ithaca, New native macrophyte die-off). Mechanical harvesters, York, July 1997. (Photo courtesy of Robert L. rototillers, cultivators, barriers, dredges and other Johnson, Department of Ecology and physical control techniques have resulted in short Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, term, often localized reductions of M. spicatum popu- Ithaca, New York) lations, but these methods are disruptive, costly, and labor intensive. For continued effect, they need to be maintained long term (Boylen et al., 1996). Nature of Damage Economic damage.
    [Show full text]
  • The 'Shed Sheet
    THE ‘SHED SHEET WINTER 2007-08 Chautauqua Watershed Conservancy CWC RECEIVES LAND DONATION The Chautauqua Watershed Conservancy recently received a donation of land from area resident and business owner Thom Shagla. The one-acre parcel, located at the corner of Fluvanna Avenue and Old Fluvanna Road in Jamestown, NY, is a wetland stream corridor and wildlife habitat for animals such as wood ducks. It also serves as an example of the stream corridor sites CWC seeks to preserve in order to enhance the water quality of Chautauqua Lake. Many, many thanks go out to Thom for his generosity! Left: Thom Shagla and John Jablonski at the Fluvanna Avenue parcel. TEN-STORY LAKESHORE HOTEL PROPOSED! John McGraw was back before the Town Board of North Harmony in January regarding his hotel/condominium/ conference center proposal for the former Bootey property on Chautauqua Lake (north of Stow). The project site borders the north side of Tom’s Point State Wildlife Management Area. Mr. McGraw requested a zoning change to allow a ten- story development, and, consequently, the town board has initiated a feasibility study to create a sewer district connect- ing his proposed development and other properties to the Chautauqua Lake South and Center Sewer District. The proposal raises a multitude of environmental concerns, and CWC Executive Director John Jablonski has twice met with Mr. McGraw to discuss how the project could be designed to mini- mize impacts to the lake and watershed. A ten-story hotel and commercial complex Inside this issue: extending back to Route 394 may have negative impacts on the wildlife and fisheries 2 habitat values at the Wildlife Management Area and lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Myriophyllum Spicatum
    Myriophyllum spicatum Eurasian Watermilfoil A Non-Native Submerged Aquatic Plant EURASIAN WATERMILFORD (EWM) & STARRY STONEWORT (SSW) SUBMERGED AQUATIC PLANTS IN LAKE WAWASEE & SYRACUSE LAKE PROBLEM STATEMENT1 EWM is present throughout the littoral zone in both Lake Wawasee & Syracuse Lake. EWM & SSW are impacting the use of Lake Wawasee & Syracuse Lake in many areas. Both EWM & SSW form dense mats in many areas, which can inhibit fishing, swimming, and boating. Observations from Lake Wawasee & Syracuse Lake over the past 8 years indicate that SSW is extremely aggressive & even appears to be out-competing EWM in many areas. These invasive plant beds may also prevent the growth of beneficial native species which often provide less recreational interference & better quality fish habitat. SSW is currently present In over 239 surface acres on Lake Wawasee and over 231 acres in Syracuse Lake. 1Source: Aquatic Weed Control. 2018. Lake Wawasee and Syracuse Lake Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan, 2017 Update. Kosciusko County, Indiana. 55pp. [see page 5] EURASIAN WATERMILFOIL Myriophyllum spicatum General Characteristics 1. Eurasian watermilfoil (EWM), Myriophyllum spicatum, is a submerged perennial vascular plant in the family Haloragaceae. a. It is native to Europe, Asia, & northern Africa (Patten 1954). It also occurs in India, Canada, & the U. S. 2. EWM leaves, about 2 inches long, are olive-green, arranged in whorls of 3 to 6 (usually 4) leaves around the stem. Leaves are deeply dissected with 14 or more uniform (in diameter) leaflets on Source: Online photo. Q.bank- each leaf, giving the leaves a feathery 250 X250. EWM leaves & leaflets. appearance (Patten 1954). EURASIAN WATERMILFOIL Myriophyllum spicatum General Characteristics 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Overwintering Habitat Requirements of the Milfoil Weevil, Euhrychiopsis Lecontei, in Two Central Wisconsin Lakes
    J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 51: 88–93 Overwintering habitat requirements of the milfoil weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei, in two central Wisconsin lakes AMY L. THORSTENSON, RONALD L. CRUNKILTON, MICHAEL A. BOZEK, AND NANCY B. TURYK* ABSTRACT agent on Eurasian watermilfoil when their population densities are high, but more study on factors limiting The native milfoil weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei (Dietz), populations adequate for control is needed (Creed and shows potential to be an effective biological control for Sheldon 1995, Sheldon and Creed 1995, Creed 2000, Jester Eurasian watermilfoil, Myriophyllum spicatum L. To better et al. 2000, Madsen et al. 2000, Newman 2004, Cuda et al. define shoreland habitat requirements for overwintering 2008). success, univariate and multivariate (discriminate analysis) Shoreland habitat for overwintering may be one impor- statistical methods were used to identify the habitat tant factor in sustaining high milfoil weevil populations. In variables that best define weevil overwintering habitat at fall (September through November), weevils move to shore two lakes in Portage County, Wisconsin: Thomas Lake, a where they overwinter at the soil-leaf litter interface glacial seepage lake, and Springville Pond, an impoundment (Newman et al. 2001). Many anthropogenic impacts may of the Little Plover River. Weevil presence and abundance disturb soil or remove the leaf litter, but the minimum leaf along the shore were evaluated in relation to the presence litter requirements are unknown. Newman et al. (2001) of milfoil fragments along shore, distance from shoreline, found that populations were most commonly found at two height above water, habitat type, soil texture, soil and duff to six meters from the shoreline, and were significantly moisture, soil and duff organic matter, duff depth, and duff lower in sites with soil moisture .
    [Show full text]