MATTER of DAVIS in Exclusion Proceedings A-7449011
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Details of Files for This Subgroup
Fonds UNHCR Fonds 11 Records of the Central Registry Series Series 2 Classified Subject Files 1971-1984 Subgroup Non-Governmental Organisations Registry Code 400.GEN – 430.SSF Scope This subgroup documents the UNHCR’s relations with Non-Governmental Organisations. It contains information relating to operational cooperation and financial interaction with national and international NGOs, including correspondence, bills, budgets, reports prepared by NGOs. Details of Files for this Subgroup Registry Code Title Dates Box ID 400.ANG Non-Governmental Organisations - Angola 1975/1975 11.02.BOX.0634 400.ARE Non-Governmental Organisations - Arab Republic of Egypt 1972/1984 11.02.BOX.0634 400.ARG Non-Governmental Organisations - Argentina 1977/1984 11.02.BOX.0634 400.AUL Non-Governmental Organisations - Australia [Volume 1] 1973/1983 11.02.BOX.0634 400.AUL Non-Governmental Organisations - Australia [Volume 2] 1983/1985 11.02.BOX.0635 400.AUS Non-Governmental Organisations - Austria [Volume 1] 1972/1981 11.02.BOX.0635 400.AUS Non-Governmental Organisations - Austria [Volume 2] 1981/1984 11.02.BOX.0635 400.BEL Non-Governmental Organisations - Belgium [Volume 1] 1973/1978 11.02.BOX.0635 400.BEL Non-Governmental Organisations - Belgium [Volume 2] 1979/1982 11.02.BOX.0635 400.BEL Non-Governmental Organisations - Belgium [Volume 3] 1982/1983 11.02.BOX.0636 400.BEL Non-Governmental Organisations - Belgium [Volume 4] 1983/1984 11.02.BOX.0636 400.BEL Non-Governmental Organisations - Belgium [Volume 5] 1984/1984 11.02.BOX.0636 400.BOT Non-Governmental Organisations -
American Expatriate Writers and the Process of Cosmopolitanism a Dissert
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Beyond the Nation: American Expatriate Writers and the Process of Cosmopolitanism A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Literature by Alexa Weik Committee in charge: Professor Michael Davidson, Chair Professor Frank Biess Professor Marcel Hénaff Professor Lisa Lowe Professor Don Wayne 2008 © Alexa Weik, 2008 All rights reserved The Dissertation of Alexa Weik is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm: _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2008 iii To my mother Barbara, for her everlasting love and support. iv “Life has suddenly changed. The confines of a community are no longer a single town, or even a single nation. The community has suddenly become the whole world, and world problems impinge upon the humblest of us.” – Pearl S. Buck v TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………… iii Dedication………………………………………………………………….. iv Epigraph……………………………………………………………………. v Table of Contents…………………………………………………………… vi Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………. vii Vita………………………………………………………………………….. xi Abstract……………………………………………………………………… xii Introduction………………………………………………………………….. 1 Chapter 1: A Brief History of Cosmopolitanism…………...………………... 16 Chapter 2: Cosmopolitanism in Process……..……………… …………….... 33 -
2013 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Original US
Marr, Abbey 1/6/2013 For Educational Use Only BIRTHRIGHT JUSTICE: THE ATTACK ON BIRTHRIGHT..., 36 N.Y.U. Rev. L. &... 36 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 57 New York University Review of Law and Social Change 2012 Article BIRTHRIGHT JUSTICE: THE ATTACK ON BIRTHRIGHTCITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRANTWOMEN OF COLOR Allison S. Hartry d1 a1 Copyright (c) 2012 New York University Review of Law and Social Change; Allison S. Hartry Abstract: Anti-immigrant sentiment in the United States is increasingly focused on restricting women of color's access to reproductive justice. Rhetoric surrounding “anchor babies” and an “invasion by birth canal” shows how the debate over immigration plays out on the bodies of immigrantwomen of color. This Article begins by describing the history of exclusion inherent in this country's immigration laws and the modern political assault on birthrightcitizenship, both of which are grounded in nativism, sexism, and racism. Using the experiences of individual women and conditions in immigration detention centers as examples, the Article then demonstrates that Immigration and Customs Enforcement appears to be targeting pregnant women for removal with the aim of preventing them from giving birth in this country. I. Introduction 58 II. The History of Exclusion in U.S. Immigration Law & Policy 64 A. The Historical and Legal Underpinnings of BirthrightCitizenship 64 1. Wong Kim Ark and the Extension of BirthrightCitizenship 66 2. The Meaning of “[B]orn . in the United States.” 68 3. Citizenship for the Children of Undocumented Immigrants 71 B. Modern Conservative Attempts to Eliminate BirthrightCitizenship 72 C. Racism, Nativism, and Attacks on BirthrightCitizenship 77 III. -
A More Meaningful Citizenship Test? Unmasking the Construction of a Universalist, Principle-Based Citizenship Ideology
A More Meaningful Citizenship Test? Unmasking the Construction of a Universalist, Principle-Based Citizenship Ideology Julian Wonjung Parkt INTRODUCTION In September 2007, the United States Office of Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS 1) unveiled the final one hundred questions to the new citizenship test, created by USCIS to be "more standardized, fair, and meaningful '2 than the current naturalization exam.3 The new exam is the result of USCIS's seven-year test development project, costing a reported 6.5 million dollars.4 Focusing on American civic values, the new test includes one hundred Copyright 0 2008 California Law Review, Inc. California Law Review, Inc. (CLR) is a California nonprofit corporation. CLR and the authors are solely responsible for the content of their publications. t J.D., UC Berkeley School of Law, 2008; PH.D., Yale University, 2005; M.A., Stanford University, 1998; B.A., Stanford University, 1997. 1 would first like to thank Victor Hwang for teaching the course "Asian Americans and the Law" in the spring of 2007 and for providing me with the forum to develop this topic. His patience and generosity was much appreciated. I would also like to thank Professor Leti Volpp for looking at drafts of this Comment and providing me with timely feedback. I would further like to thank all the members of the California Law Review for their assistance throughout the various stages of this Comment. In particular, I would like to thank Angela Hollowell-Fuentes for her expert reading of the first draft of this Comment; Mayte Santacruz Benavidez for her thoroughness in checking sources; and Aaron Gershbock for his meticulous attention to details during the final read. -
Respectability & the Quest for Citizenship
Brooklyn Law Review Volume 83 | Issue 1 Article 12 12-12-2017 Respectability & the Quest for Citizenship Angela M. Banks Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr Recommended Citation Angela M. Banks, Respectability & the Quest for Citizenship, 83 Brook. L. Rev. (2017). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr/vol83/iss1/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brooklyn Law Review by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. Respectability & the Quest for Citizenship Angela M. Banks† INTRODUCTION Historically, immigration and citizenship law and policy in the United States has been shaped by the idea that certain immigrant populations present a threat to American society. Such ideas justified the Alien and Sedition Acts,1 the Chinese Exclusion Act,2 the enactment of new deportation grounds in 1917,3 and the adoption of national origin quotas in 1924.4 These ideas continue to operate today and influence law and policy. For example, on January 27, 2017, President Donald J. Trump declared that the entry of Iranian, Iraqi, Libyan, Somalian, Sudanese, Syrian, and Yemeni citizens along with Syrian refugees to the United States is “detrimental to the interests of the United States.”5 Two days † Charles J. Merriam Distinguished Professor of Law, Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, Arizona State University. I would like to thank the participants in the 2015 Global Migration, Structural Inclusion and Citizenship Education Across Nations Conference, 2015 Law & Society Annual Meeting, 2014 Immigration Law Teachers Workshop, and the University of Richmond Emroch Faculty Colloquy for comments, advice, and discussion. -
From Exclusion to Inclusion
From Exclusion to Inclusion 1941–1992 Around 9 :00 in the morning on April 21, 1945, Daniel K. Inouye, a 20-year-old army lieutenant from Honolulu, Hawaii, was shot in the stomach on the side of a mountain in northwestern Italy. The German bullet went clean out his back and missed his spine by a fraction of an inch. “It felt like someone punched me,” he remembered years later. “But the pain was almost non-existent. A little ache, that’s all and since the bleeding was not much I said well, I’ll keep on going.”1 Later that morning, Inouye, a pre-med student who had been getting ready for church when Japan bombed Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, was hit again. This time a rifle grenade nearly blew off his entire right arm. After picking up his tommy gun with his left hand, he continued to charge up the hill, firing at German soldiers as he went. Eventually shot in the leg, Inouye waited until his men seized control of the mountain before being evacuated.2 The war in Europe ended 17 days later. Inouye lived in military hospitals for the next two years to rebuild his strength and learn to do everyday tasks with one arm. The war forced him to adapt, and over the next two decades, the country he nearly died for began to adapt to the war’s consequences as well. For the most marginalized people—women and minorities, especially—World War II had profound implications for what it meant to be American. -
Not for Publication United States District Court District of New Jersey : Moorish Science Temple of America 4Th & 5Th : Gene
Case 1:11-cv-07418-RBK-KMW Document 2 Filed 01/12/12 Page 1 of 12 PageID: <pageID> NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : MOORISH SCIENCE TEMPLE OF Civil Action No. 11-7418 (RBK) AMERICA 4TH & 5TH : GENERATION et al., : MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, AND ORDER : v. : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY at el., : Defendants. : This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s submission of a civil complaint, see Docket Entry No. 1, and an application to proceed in forma pauperis, see Docket Entry No. 1-1, and it appearing that: 1. The aforesaid complaint is executed in the style indicating that the draftor(s) was/were affected by “Moorish,” “Marrakush,” “Murakush” or akin perceptions, which often coincide with “redempotionist” and/or “sovereign citizen” socio-political beliefs. See Bey v. Stumpf, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120076, at *2-13 (D.N.J. Oct. 17, 2011) (detailing various aspects of said position). Moorish and Redemptionist Movements. Two concepts, which may or may not operate as interrelated, color the issues at hand. One of these concepts underlies ethnic/religious identification movement of certain groups of individuals who refer to themselves as “Moors,” while the other concept provides the basis for another movement of certain groups of individuals, which frequently produces these individuals’ denouncement of United States citizenship, self-declaration of other, imaginary Case 1:11-cv-07418-RBK-KMW Document 2 Filed 01/12/12 Page 2 of 12 PageID: <pageID> “citizenship” and accompanying self-declaration of equally imaginary “diplomatic immunity.” [a]. Moorish Movement In 1998, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit - being one of the first courts to detail the concept of Moorish movement, observed as follows: [The Moorish Science Temple of America is a] black Islamic sect . -
HOUSE OF. REPRESENTATIVES Resolution 198
2898 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE APRIL 5 REPORTS OF COMMI'ITEES ON PUBLIC MEMORIALS 400. By the SPEAKER: Petition of the BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS American Bar Association petitioning con Under clause 3 of rule XXII, memori sideration of their resolution with reference to Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of als were presented and referred as fol House bill 1025; to the Committee on the committees were delivered to the Clerk lows: Civll Service. for printing and reference to the proper By the SPEAKER: Memorial of the Legisla calendar, as follows: ture of the State of North Dakota, memorial izing the President and the Congress of the Mr. CLARK: Committee on Rules. House United States to continue and provide for HOUSE OF. REPRESENTATIVES Resolution 198. Resolution for the consider- the continuation of the program of incentive . ation of House Joint Resolution 14 authoriz payments to farmers who increase their pro MoNDAY, APRIL 5, 1943 ing the execution of certain obligations under duction in 1943; to the Committee on Appro the treaties of 1903 and 1936 with Panama, priations. The House met at 12 o'clock noon. and other commitments; without amend Also, memorial of the Legislature of the The Chaplain, Rev. James Shera ment (Rept. No. 340). Referred to the House State of Washington, memorializing the Pres Montgomery, D. D., offered the following Calendar. ident and the Congress of the United States prayer: Mr. DIES: Committee on Rules. House to take action relative to the purchase, main Resolution 199. Resolution for the consider tenance, and operation of bridges across the Glory be to Thy name, 0 Lord Most ation of H. -
U.S. Citizenship in Puerto Rico: One Hundred Years After the Jones Act Contents
CENTRO: Journal of the Center for Puerto Rican Studies SPECIAL ISSUE: VOL. 29, NO. 1 – 2017 U.S. CITIZENSHIP IN PUERTO RICO: ONE HUNDRED YEARS AFTER THE JONES ACT CONTENTS CENTRO: Journal of the Center for Puerto Rican Studies vol. 29, no. 1 – 2017 U.S. CITIZENSHIP IN PUERTO RICO: One Hundred Years After the Jones Act Guest Editors: Charles R. Venator-Santiago and Edgardo Meléndez Preface: U.S. Citizenship in Puerto Rico: Dual Consciousness About Law And Justice: One Hundred Years After the Jones Act Puerto Ricans’ Battle For U.S. Citizenship In Hawai‘i —Edwin Meléndez —Susan K. Serrano Introduction: U.S. Citizenship in Puerto Rico: “…Acting Like an American Citizen”: Discursive and One Hundred Years After the Jones Act Political Resistance to Puerto Rican U.S. Citizenship —Charles R. Venator-Santiago and Edgardo Meléndez Anomalies in the 1930s —Daniel Acosta Elkan Mapping the Contours of the History of the Extension of U.S. Citizenship to Puerto Rico, 1898–Present A Note on the Puerto Rican De-Naturalization —Charles R. Venator-Santiago Exception of 1948 —Charles R. Venator-Santiago The Unresolved Constitutional Issues of Puerto Rican Citizenship Puerto Ricans as Contingent Citizens: Shifting —Rogers M. Smith Mandated Identities and Imperial Disjunctures —Pedro Cabán Citizenship and Equality in an Age of Diversity: Reflections on Balzac and the Indian Civil Rights Act Puerto Ricans and U.S. Citizenship in 1917: —Sanford Levinson Imperatives of Security —Bartholomew Sparrow and Jennifer Lamm To Be or Not to Be: Puerto Ricans and Their Illusory U.S. Citizenship Comments on the Jones Act and the Grant of U.S. -
World Passport from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
World Passport From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The World Passport is a document issued by the World Service Authority, a non-profit organization founded by Garry Davis in 1954,[1] citing Article 13, Section 2, of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.[2] Contents 1 Appearance and issuance fees 2 As a travel document 2.1 Notable acceptances 2.2 Notable rejections 2.2.1 Commonwealth of Independent States 2.2.2 United States 2.2.3 Other countries 2.3 Use by refugees and stateless persons 3 As an identity document 4 As a political statement 5 Counterfeits and fraudulent issuance 6 List of notable World Passport holders 7 See also 8 References 9 External links Appearance and issuance fees The World Passport is similar in appearance to a national passport or other travel document. The appearance is so similar that in 1974 a criminal case was lodged against Garry Davis in France regarding his issuance of World Passports.[3] In 1979, the World Passport was a 42-page document, with a dark blue cover, and text in English, French, Spanish, Russian, Arabic, Chinese, and Esperanto. It contained a five-page section for medical history and a six-page section for listing organisational affiliation. The fee charged at that time was $32 and postage for a three-year passport with the possibility of two years' extension of validity.[4] The latest edition of the World Passport was issued January 2007. It has an embedded "ghost" photo for security, covered with a plastic film. Its data page imitates the format of a machine-readable passport, with an alphanumeric code bar in the machine- readable zone (MRZ) enabling it to be scanned by an optical reader. -
UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations
UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Beyond the nation : American expatriate writers and the process of cosmopolitanism Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2bb925ff Author Weik, Alexa Publication Date 2008 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Beyond the Nation: American Expatriate Writers and the Process of Cosmopolitanism A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Literature by Alexa Weik Committee in charge: Professor Michael Davidson, Chair Professor Frank Biess Professor Marcel Hénaff Professor Lisa Lowe Professor Don Wayne 2008 © Alexa Weik, 2008 All rights reserved The Dissertation of Alexa Weik is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm: _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2008 iii To my mother Barbara, for her everlasting love and support. iv “Life has suddenly changed. The confines of a community are no longer a single town, or even a single nation. The community has suddenly become the whole world, and world problems impinge upon the humblest of us.” – Pearl S. Buck v TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………… iii Dedication………………………………………………………………….. iv Epigraph……………………………………………………………………. -
SECTION 404(C) of the NATIONALITY ACT of 1940: RESIDENCE ABROAD AS AUTOMATIC EXPATRIATION of the NATURALIZED AMERICAN*
NOTES SECTION 404(c) OF THE NATIONALITY ACT OF 1940: RESIDENCE ABROAD AS AUTOMATIC EXPATRIATION OF THE NATURALIZED AMERICAN* CONGRESSIONAL power to differentiate between the naturalized and native- born American citizen has never been dearly defined by the Supreme Court. Although the Court has upheld two statutes providing for loss of naturalized citizenship, neither created a significant distinction between the naturalized and native-born American. The first, providing for denaturalization because of fraud or illegality in the naturalization proceedings, acted on the rationale that the person affected had not become a citizen in the first place.' The sec- ond statute created a presumption of loss of naturalized citizenship upon resi- dence in a foreign state.2 Because this presumption was easily overcome by * Lapides v. Clark, 176 F-2d 619 (D.C. Cir. 1949). 1. Nationality Act of 1906 §§ 15, 23, 34 STAT. 601, 603 (1906). These provisions were substantially reenacted in the Nationality Act of 1940 § 338, 54 STAT. 1158 (1940), 8 U.S.C. § 738 (1946). They provide for cancellation of a certificate of citizenship on grounds of fraud or illegal procurement. Additional provision is made for cancellation of the certifi- cate of a naturalized American who, within five years after his naturalization, returns to the country of his habitation or goes to another foreign country and takes permanent residence there. This is considered "prima fade evidence of a lack of intention on the part of such person to become a permanent citizen .... and, in the absence of counter- vailing evidence, it.. [is] . sufficient in the proper proceeding to authorize the rev- ocation.., of the order admitting such person to citizenship and the cancellation of the certificate of naturalization as having been obtained through fraud." For the Court's view that the statute was not discriminatory, see Luria v.