Population Census 2011 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Population Census 2011 1 ISBN: 978-963-235-348-7 9 789632 353487 Preliminary data Hungarian Central Statistical Offi ce POPULATION CENSUS 2011 1. Preliminary data Budapest, 2012 © Hungarian Central Statistical Offi ce, 2012 ISBN 978-963-235-361-6 Compiled by the Census Department of the Hungarian Central Statistical Offi ce Responsible editor: Gabriella Vukovich President Head of Department:: Irén Waff enschmidt Editors: Anasztázia Bojer Éva Simor Irén Waff enschmidt Marcell Kovács Mónika Vörös Manuscript revised by: Zsuzsa Szabó Radnóti Lay-out editor: Gabriella Simon Horváth Further information: Marcell Kovács Phone: (+36-1) 345-6309, e-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.ksh.hu [email protected] (+36-1) 345-6789 (phone), (+36-1) 345-6788 (fax) Cover design: Lounge Design Kft. CONTENTS Dear Reader! ............................................................................................................... 5 Number of population and dwellings based on preliminary data of the 2011 census ....................................................................................................7 Duration of the census, method of data provision ..................................................... 14 Methodological information ..................................................................................... 15 Tables ........................................................................................................................ 19 1. Population ..............................................................................................................19 1.1 National data ....................................................................................................19 1.1.1 Population number, population density .................................................. 19 1.2 Regional and county data .................................................................................19 1.2.1 Number of resident poulation and factors of changes in population number ..........................................................................19 1.2.2 Changes in population number by factors ..............................................20 1.2.3 Changes in population density ............................................................... 20 1.2.4 Number of resident population by sex ....................................................21 1.2.5 Distribution of resident population by sex ............................................. 21 1.2.6 Regional distribution of resident population .......................................... 22 1.3 Data by type of locality .................................................................................... 23 1.3.1 Number of resident population and factors of changes in population number ..........................................................................23 1.3.2 Changes in population number by factors ..............................................24 1.3.3 Number of resident population by sex ....................................................25 1.3.4 Regional distribution of resident population .......................................... 26 2. Dwellings ...............................................................................................................27 2.1 National data ....................................................................................................27 2.1.1 Number of housing units, dwellings .......................................................27 2.2 Regional and county data .................................................................................27 2.2.1 Number of housing units, institutions by type ....................................... 27 2.2.2 Changes in dwelling stock ......................................................................28 2.2.3 Dwelling stock by fl oor space, 2011 ....................................................... 28 2.2.4 Distribution of dwelling stock by fl oor space, 2011 ................................29 2.2.5 Regional distribution of dwelling stock, average fl oor space ...................29 2.3 Data by type of locality .................................................................................... 30 2.3.1 Changes in dwelling stock ......................................................................30 2.3.2 Dwelling stock by fl oor space, 2011 ....................................................... 31 2.3.3 Distribution of dwelling stock by fl oor space, 2011 ................................32 2.3.4 Regional distribution of dwelling stock, average fl oor space ...................33 3. Density standard ....................................................................................................34 3.1 Regional and county data .................................................................................34 3.1.1 Occupied dwellings and their occupants, density standard .....................34 3.2 Data by type of locality .................................................................................... 35 3.2.1 Occupied dwellings and their occupants, density standard .....................35 Preliminary data 3 Dear Reader! Th e Hungarian Central Statistical Offi ce conducted the 15th census of Hungary in October 2011. Th e census of 2011 has been performed taking into consideration the traditions and experiences of nearly one and a half century and, at the same time, adjusted to the social, demographic and economic conditions of the 21st century with content and methods suitable to explore them. At the same time, based on UN recommendations, our census fi ts in the line of censuses worldwide round 2010, and it meets the requirements of the EU legislation on censuses as well. Consequently, it is possible so to trace the changes compared to the earlier censuses in Hungary as to compare the observed phenomena with those of other European or non-European countries. In October 2011, nearly 40 thousand enumerators visited about 4.4 million dwellings in order to collect data on the social, demographic and economic characteristics as well on the housing conditions of the population in Hungary. 2 million personal questionnaires from 827 thousand dwellings were completed and received via internet, while more than one and a half million paper questionnaires were self-completed. Processing and publishing census data is a process of several years. In order to inform those who are interested as soon as possible, and in line with the census practices in Hungary, HCSO publishes preliminary census data already before data processing on the basis of information collected separately and produced after the primary review of questionnaires received by diff erent means and methods of data provision. After completing the processing of questionnaires, the thematically detailed segments of the rich data treasure produced by the census will be published, and, within the limits of data protection rules, we will provide possibility for our users to search the thematically arranged data stocks as well. Our present publication shows the changes in the population number and in the most important data of the dwelling stock. Dear Reader! I would like to thank you for contributing to the success of the census either as data provider or as participant. Budapest, March 2012 Dr. Gabriella Vukovich President Hungarian Central Statistical Offi ce Preliminary data 5 NUMBER OF POPULATION AND DWELLINGS BASED ON PRELIMINARY DATA OF THE 2011 CENSUS Population, population density Change in the According to the preliminary results of the census compiled on the basis of population number information of data collection organization preceding detailed data processing, the population of Hungary was 9 million 982 thousand on 1 October 2011, 2.1 percent fewer than at the census of 1 February 2011. Th e population of the country has been continuously decreasing since 1981. Th e extent of the fall was the most considerable in the 1980s, it moderated in the 1990s, and then, it accelerated again between 2001 and 2011. Natural decrease is a determinant factor in the fall of the population number. Since 1981, the number of liveborn children in Hungary has been fewer year- by-year than the number of deceases. Th e extent of natural decrease showed a rising trend, it was 33 thousand per year on the average in the 1990s, while after 2000, it amounted to more than 35 thousand. Th e fall in the population number due to natural decrease was somewhat moderated by the positive net international migration in the last two and a half decades. However, in the last decade, immigration surplus could compensate only less than half of the natural decrease. Figure 1 Changes in resident population, 1870–2011 Thousand 12 000 10 000 8 000 6 000 10 709 10 301 10 375 10 198 9 961 9 982 9 316 9 205 4 000 8 685 7 987 7 612 6 854 6 009 5 329 2 000 5 011 0 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1941 1949 1960 1970 1980 1990 2001 2011 In the period since the 2001 census, resident population has decreased al- most in each county, except for Pest county, where the number of population grew considerably, by nearly 13 percent and Győr-Moson-Sopron county, where the rise was more moderate, 2.4 percent. Among counties with decreasing population, the lowest, 0.8 percent fall occurred in Hajdú-Bihar, while the highest one, 9.0 percent was observed in Békés county. Preliminary data 7 In the last ten years, the process of concentration of the country’s resident population in Central Hungary continued to strengthen: while in 2001 28.1 percent of the population lived in Budapest or in Pest county, this proportion
Recommended publications
  • FOUNDATION Regional Analysis PBN ENG V2
    HUNGARIAN REGIONAL ANALYSIS BUILDING REGIONAL RESILIENCE TO INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURAL CHANGE West-Transdanubian Region - Hungary Hungarian Partner Project Partner: Pannon Business Network Association Website Twitter https://www.interregeurope.eu/foundation/ @FOUNDATION_EU CONTENT INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... - 2 - Foundation Project partners ..................................................................................................... - 2 - Hungary – West-Transdanubian Region ................................................................................... - 3 - Regional Population and Industrial Statistics ........................................................................... - 6 - Economic Resilience across Europe ......................................................................................... - 12 - Hungry (Győr) – NUTS2 Nyugat-Dunántúl .............................................................................. - 13 - Industrial Restructuring in the West-Transdanubian Region .................................................. - 16 - Key policy players in the West-Transdanubian Region ........................................................... - 22 - Economic Restructuring – Case Study ..................................................................................... - 28 - INDUSTRY IN TRANSITION - CASE STUDY .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Differences in Hungary: the Current Stage of Local Food Production at the County-Level
    Regional differences in Hungary: the current stage of local food production at the county-level ZSÓFIA BENEDEK1,$, BÁLINT BALÁZS2 1: Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary 2: Environmental Social Science Research Group, Hungary $: corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] Paper prepared for presentation for the 142nd EAAE Seminar Growing Success? Agriculture and rural development in an enlarged EU May 29-30, 2014 Corvinus University of Budapest Budapest, Hungary Copyright 2014 by Zsófia Benedek and Bálint Balázs. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. 1 Abstract There is an increasing political interest in Hungary to relocalize food. Previous achievements on the Food Relocalization Index (Ricketts Hein et al., 2006) is used and applied to Hungary to map the local food activity. We focus on different indicators of production to consider the extent of small-scale food-related activity. Biophysical limits (the ratio of agricultural areas) are also considered to reveal areas where funds can be allocated to ensure efficiency. Eastern Hungary has the highest potential for further development as it has relatively high level of food activity and food production capacity. Keywords: short food supply chains; small-scale farmers; regional differences; Rural Development Program; quantitative analysis Introduction In the last years a rapid spread of short food supply chains (SFSCs) was witnessed; and also, an increasing political interest to relocalize food. The latest EU study describing the state-of- the-art of SFSCs in the EU understands them as food chains where the number of intermediaries (most typically retailers) is minimized (ideally to zero); and food production, processing, trade and retail occur within a particular narrowly defined geographical area (Kneafsey et al., 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Centrope Location Marketing Brochure
    Invest in opportunities. Invest in centrope. Central European Region Located at the heart of the European Union, centrope is a booming intersection of four countries, crossing the borders of Austria, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary. The unique mixture of sustained economic growth and high quality of life in this area offers tremendous opportunities for investors looking for solid business. A stable, predictable political and economic situation. Attractive corporate tax rates. A highly qualified workforce at reasonable labour costs. World-class infrastruc- ture. A rich cultural life based on shared history. Beautiful landscapes including several national parks. And much more. The centrope region meets all expectations. meet opportunities. meet centrope. Vibrant Region Roughly six and a half million people live in the Central European Region centrope. The position of this region at the intersection of four countries and four languages is reflected in the great variety of its constituent sub-regions and cities. The two capitals Bratislava and Vienna, whose agglomerations – the “twin cities” – are situated at only 60 kilometres from each other, Brno and Győr as additional cities of supra-regional importance as well as numerous other towns are the driving forces of an economically and culturally expanding European region. In combination with attractive landscapes and outdoor leisure opportunities, centrope is one of Europe’s most vibrant areas to live and work in. Population (in thousands) Area (in sq km) Absolute % of centrope Absolute % of centrope South Moravia 1,151.7 17.4 7,196 16.2 Győr-Moson-Sopron 448.4 6.8 4,208 9.5 Vas 259.4 3.9 3,336 7.5 Burgenland 284.0 4.3 3,965 8.9 Lower Austria 1,608.0 24.3 19,178 43.1 Vienna 1,698.8 25.5 414 0.9 Bratislava Region 622.7 9.3 2,053 4.6 Trnava Region 561.5 8.5 4,147 9.3 centrope 6,634.5 44,500 EU-27 501,104.2 4,403,357 Source: Eurostat, population data of 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Europe. Discover Centrope
    centrope region centrope partners Austria • Federal Province of Burgenland [email protected] Brno • Federal Province of Lower Austria www.centrope.com • Federal Province and City of Vienna • City of Eisenstadt Jižní Morava • City of St.Pölten Czech Republic • South Moravian Region • City of Brno Trnava • Vysočina Region (observer) Niederösterreich Trnava Hungary Bratislava • Győr-Moson-Sopron County St. Pölten Wien Bratislava • Vas County • City of Győr • City of Sopron • City of Szombathely Eisenstadt Legal notice: Slovakia Published by the centrope agency on behalf Sopron Győr • Bratislava Self-Governing Region of the centrope capacity partnership. Győr-Moson-Sopron • Trnava Self-Governing Region • City of Bratislava Design&Layout: • City of Trnava www.TOPVISION.sk Burgenland Supported by funds of the European Pictures: Szombathely Union, CENTRAL EUROPE programme centrope agency Vas discover europe discover centrope discover europe discover centrope The Czech Republic, Hungary, Austria and Slovakia are four countries that make up the heart of Europe. A shared history has naturally brought them together in the Central European region - centrope, which is incredibly varied and full of contrasts. The beautiful natural environment in the region’s national parks is combined with a wealth of rivers, lakes and thermal springs, as well as vast, sun-kissed vineyards, orchards and fields of sunflowers. This natural environment allows for leisure activities and family outings. As you walk through the centrope region, the common history of the old noble families who left behind magnificent mansions and castles - now used as unique cultural centres - oozes out with every step. Culture comes alive in all the region’s cities. Throughout the year you will find a wide range of cultural events, modern art and folk traditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Level Governance and the Impact of EU Integration in Hungarian Regional and Environmental Policies
    EU supported Research Project titled “EU Enlargement and Multi-Level Gov- ernance in European Regional and Environment Policies: Patterns of Institu- tional Learning, Adaptation and Europeanization among Cohesion Countries (Greece, Ireland and Portugal) and Lessons for New Members (Hungary and Poland)” - ADAPT First report Multi-level Governance and the Impact of EU Integration in Hungarian Regional and Environmental Policies Study prepared and compiled as Hungarian National Report by Tamás Fleischer, Institute for World Economy of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest Péter Futó, Budapest University for Economics and Public Administration Gyula Horváth Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sci- ences, Pécs Ilona Pálné Kovács, Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Pécs Budapest and Pécs, July 2002 Multi-level Governance and the Impact of EU Integration in Hungarian Regional and Environmental Policies Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Economic context........................................................................................................... 3 1.2 EU integration context ................................................................................................... 6 2 The main frameworks of the Hungarian administrative system ................................. 8 2.1 Strong local tier – weak counties ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Chances of Bringing Zala County Into Line with Others Concerning Development Assistance of Enterprises
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Kaposvári Egyetem Folyóiratai / Kaposvar University: E-Journals Ágnes Csanádi The Chances of Bringing Zala County into Line with Others Concerning Development Assistance of Enterprises Összefoglalás Az elhúzódó gazdasági válság minden korábbinál erőteljesebben felszínre hozza a különböző térségek eltérő fejlettségéből és fejlődési dinamikájából keletkező feszültségeket. Ma még nyitott kérdés, hogy egy elmaradott megye fejlettebb régióhoz tartozása és relatíve kedvező regionális gazdasági környezete mennyiben segítheti a régiós, illetve az országos átlaghoz való felzárkózását. A tapasztalatok azt mutatják, hogy a történelmileg kialakult hátrányos helyzet felszámolásához az érintett megye számára az eddiginél érzékelhetőbbé kellene tenni a felzárkózást segítő „pozitív diszkriminációt”. Ehhez azonban nem elég a régió és a megyék szándéka. Arra is szükség lenne, hogy a régiók és a megyék a jelenleginél nagyobb mértékben rendelkezzenek saját fejlesztési forrásokkal, amit a területi egyenlőtlenségek mérséklésére fordíthatnának. A tanulmány Zala megye és a Nyugat- dunántúli Régió gazdasági teljesítményének és az országos átlaghoz viszonyított helyzetének összehasonlító elemzésén túl a megyei vállalkozások pályázati aktivitását vizsgálja az első és a második Nemzeti Fejlesztési Terv időszakában. Foglalkozik a vállalkozások forrásbevonási képességével, a pályázati munka hatékonyságával. Külön témaként elemzi a Magyar Fejlesztési Bank hitelprogramját, aminek
    [Show full text]
  • The Committee of the Regions and the Hungarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union
    The Committee of the Regions and the Hungarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union © Gödöllő: The Royal Palace, Budapest: Mr. Tamas Cziglan, Debrecen: Mr. Gabor Nagy Hungary: Six months to focus on the european rubik cube! Mercedes Bresso President of the Committee of the Regions A range of colours, strong rivets and painstaking combinations, these are the magic ingredients that give the cube invented by Hungarian Ernõ Rubik its solidity and flexibility. These very same ingredients are at the core of the European Union’s progress: the diversity of our regions, the interdependence of our institutions, and the search for shared solutions. It is indeed in a heartfelt spirit of cooperation that the Committee of the Regions welcomes the beginning of the Hungarian Presidency, which completes the institutional cube introduced by the Lisbon Treaty, the first Trio- Presidency. There are numerous and significant items on the Hungarian Presidency’s agenda. The Committee of the Regions is primed to make its contribution. Working together, we will successfully launch the new economic governance mechanisms and develop the framework of medium to long term policy initiatives and financial instruments. The implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy will start on 1 January 2011, with the beginning of the so- called European Semester. The Spring Council will have the job of strengthening the EU’s coordination of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth policies. The Committee will urge it on by promoting the partnership between local and regional authorities, national administrations and EU institutions, as well as through the implementation of the Territorial Pacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion Papers
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by GEO-LEOe-docs CENTRE FOR REGIONAL STUDIES OF HUNGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES DISCUSSION PAPERS No. 49 Chances of Hungarian–Slovak Cross-Border Relations by István MEZEI Series editor Zoltán GÁL Pécs 2006 ISSN 0238–2008 ISBN 963 9052 58 2 2006 by Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Translator Éva Hatvani, Gábor Mezei The maps were drawn by Máté Mády Technical editor Ilona Csapó Printed in Hungary by Sümegi Nyomdaipari, Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Ltd., Pécs 2 CONTENTS 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Components of the conceptual frame ..................................................................... 8 1.1.1 Interpretation of the border phenomenon .................................................... 8 1.1.2 Regionalisation and political interest ........................................................ 11 2 Factors affecting cross-border relations between Hungary and Slovakia..................... 16 2.1 Effects of forming a country................................................................................. 16 2.1.1 The History of Slovakia and the Slovak People ....................................... 16 2.1.2 Similarities and differences between the two countries............................ 24 2.2 Administration: conflict of nationalism and rationalism ...................................... 27 2.2.1 Administration
    [Show full text]
  • Focus Report on the Service Industry As a Growth Factor in Centrope Centrope Partners Centrope Agency
    centrope Regional Development Monitoring. Focus Report on the Service Industry as a Growth Factor in centrope centrope partners centrope agency Austria centrope coordination office I thematic and operative • Federal Province of Burgenland co-ordination, communication & secretariat: • Federal Province of Lower Austria Europaforum Wien, Rahlgasse 3/2, A-1060 Wien, • Federal Province and City of Vienna [email protected] • City of Eisenstadt • City of St. Pölten centrope local offices I regional project management & co-operation nodes: Czech Republic • South Moravian Region Office Austria I focus responsibility ‘knowledge region’: • City of Brno Regionalmanagement Burgenland, • Vysočina Region (observer) [email protected] Regionalmanagement Niederösterreich, Hungary [email protected] • Győr-Moson-Sopron County Vienna Business Agency, [email protected] • Vas County Office Czech Republic I focus responsibility ‘human capital’: • City of Győr HOPE-E.S., v.o.s., [email protected] • City of Sopron Office Hungary I focus responsibility ‘spatial integration’: • City of Szombathely CEURINA NKft, [email protected] Slovakia Office Slovakia I focus responsibility ‘culture & tourism’: • Bratislava Self-Governing Region Slovenský Dom Centrope, [email protected] • Trnava Self-Governing Region The brochure presents key findings of the centrope Regional • City of Bratislava Development Focus Report on the Service Industry as a Growth • City of Trnava Factor in centrope.” Consortium of the centrope capacity pilot project “Regional Development Monitoring” Austrian Institute of Economic Research Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economic Research Hungarian Academy of Sciences, West Hungarian Research Institute of the Centre for Regional Studies The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies Imprint Published by the centrope agency on behalf of the centrope capacity partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Statistics, Volume 7, No 2
    Spatial distribution of the top 500 companies on regional and county levels in Hungary – a repeated analysis Mariann Szabó The aim of this research is to investigate how the Budapest University spatial distribution of 500 companies with best of Technology and Economics, sales performance has changed since 2014 in Department of Environmental Hungary. Thus, the analysis elaborated by Csete– Economics Szabó (2014) is repeated. Subsequent to the anal- E-mail: [email protected] ysis, the change in performance of enterprises on a regional level is linked to economic polarisa- Keywords: tion: the sharply widening inequality of income regional development, and wealth. In order to provide a broader view agglomeration economies, on the Hungarian economy, the article evaluates assessment of enterprises with the effect of the allocation of development funds best sales performance, for the 2007–2013 programming period as the export, development funds have a dominant role form- sub-national scale ing the income generation patterns of the coun- try. The primary research consists of an analysis on the change in the number and total (gross) sales value of the top 500 companies (companies with the best sales performance in a specific ref- erence year) on NUTS 2 and NUTS 3 levels. Moreover, it demonstrates the sectoral diversity of regions and interprets the concrete enterprise ranking in the case of the first quarter, reflecting the five most dominant regions that have the largest share in the total (gross) sales value among the top 500 companies. Finally, the rela- tion of changes in gross value added (GVA)/capita and in total (gross) sales value of the top 500 companies is interpreted.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Research Online Oro.Open.Ac.Uk
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs Making peace in the shadow of war: The Austrian-Hungarian borderlands, 1945-1956 Journal Item How to cite: Pittaway, Mark (2008). Making peace in the shadow of war: The Austrian-Hungarian borderlands, 1945-1956. Contemporary European History, 17(3) pp. 345–364. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 2008 Cambridge University Press Version: Version of Record Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0960777308004529 Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk Making Peace in the Shadow of War: The Austrian–Hungarian Borderlands, 1945–1956 MARK PITTAWAY Abstract This article examines the process of state reconstruction in Austria and Hungary’s borderlands that followed the Second World War. This process of state reconstruction was also a process of pacification, as it represented an attempt to (re)build states on the foundations of the military settlement of the war. The construction of legitimate state authority was at its most successful on the Austrian side of the border, where political actors were able to gain legitimacy by creating a state that acted as an effective protector of the immediate demands of the local community for security from a variety of threats. On the Hungarian side of the border the state was implicated with some of the actors who were seen as threatening local communities, something that produced political polarisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Pubs in Vas County
    PP periodica polytechnica “Pubs in Vas County” From the cadastral maps of 1857 Architecture 43/2(2012)45-51 to the present day doi:10.3311/PPar.7287 http://www.periodicapolytechnica.org/ar Creative Commons Attribution b Péter Ivicsics RESEARCH ARTICLE RECEIVED 7 DECEMBER 2012 Abstract Introduction The examination of pubs and inns in Vas County was made Public houses and inns (hereinafter: pubs) occupy an impor- possible by the first cadastral survey in 1857. The present paper tant position in the society, economy and architecture of a given attempts to examine this important building type. The architec- age. As communal spaces, they provide a meeting place, a forum tural design, functions, layout, the location within settlements where people can discuss their concerns, travellers from faraway and the owners are part of the research. Based on the architec- areas can access local information, guests can enjoy themselves, tural analysis and value assessment of the buildings, the deci- and in addition, they may host social and cultural events. The pub sion as to whether they should be put on the national or local is the communal centre of a settlement, one that is frequented by lists of historic monuments and thus be protected can be made. many people, where a variety of information can be exchanged and connections built that may be important in everyday life. As Keywords a building type, it is typically a characteristic and notable part of pubs · cadastral map 1857 · roadside inn · restaurant · the townscape, often as an outstanding component. assessment of present day condition of monuments The present paper attempts to examine this historic building type based on its registration in a limited territorial unit, Vas County.
    [Show full text]