DOCSLIB.ORG

Territorial Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Territorial Analysis TERRITORIAL ANALYSIS of the next Hungary-Serbia INTERREG IPA CBC programme October 14th 2020 H-1406 Budapest, Pf. 7. [email protected] www.cesci-net.eu , Territorial analysis of the next Hungary-Serbia INTERREG IPA CBC programme fContents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Context and territorial scope ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Methodology, preparation process ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Factors negatively affecting the results .............................................................................................................................................. 8 2 Territorial analysis ......................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Territorial cohesion ................................................................................................................................................................................. 10 2.1.1 Environmental protection and environmental sustainability ................................................................................................................ 10 2.1.2 Transport connections ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 34 2.1.3 Development of cross-border functions ...................................................................................................................................................... 46 2.2 Economic cohesion ................................................................................................................................................................................. 60 2.2.1 Economic logistics ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 60 2.2.2 Economic development....................................................................................................................................................................................... 70 2.2.3 Heritage related management ......................................................................................................................................................................... 91 2.2.4 Tourism ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 107 2.3 Social cohesion....................................................................................................................................................................................... 122 2.3.1 Social challenges ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 122 2.3.2 Education, training ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 135 2.3.3 Employment market cooperation ................................................................................................................................................................ 148 2.3.4 People to People cooperation ....................................................................................................................................................................... 157 3 Results of the online surveys ...................................................................................................................................... 173 3.1 The methodology of the online surveys ....................................................................................................................................... 173 3.2 Results of the surveys .......................................................................................................................................................................... 178 3.2.1 Opinion about the current Programme ..................................................................................................................................................... 178 3.2.2 Difficulties and solutions .................................................................................................................................................................................. 179 3.2.3 Importance of the topics ................................................................................................................................................................................. 180 3.2.4 Characteristics of the project ideas.............................................................................................................................................................. 183 3.2.5 Innovative tools ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 185 4 Results of the stakeholder workshops ...................................................................................................................... 187 4.1 Methodology of the workshops ...................................................................................................................................................... 187 4.2 Main findings of the workshops ...................................................................................................................................................... 189 4.2.1 Quantifiable results ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 189 4.2.2 Recorded insights on the different topics ................................................................................................................................................. 192 5 Policy frameworks ....................................................................................................................................................... 196 5.1 European level ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 196 5.1.1 EU Regulation for the next INTERREG IPA programmes ..................................................................................................................... 196 5.1.2 Main European strategic documents .......................................................................................................................................................... 199 5.1.3 The EU Strategy for the Danube Region (EUSDR).................................................................................................................................. 204 5.1.4 The Border Orientation Paper ........................................................................................................................................................................ 213 5.1.5 The Zagreb Declaration .................................................................................................................................................................................... 215 5.2 National level .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 217 5.2.1 Strategic documents related to territorial cohesion ............................................................................................................................. 217 5.2.2 Strategic documents related to economic cohesion ............................................................................................................................ 228 5.2.3 Strategic documents related to social cohesion..................................................................................................................................... 233 5.3 Regional level.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 237 5.3.1 Regional development plans ......................................................................................................................................................................... 237 5.3.2 Cross-border strategies .................................................................................................................................................................................... 240 6 Cross-border obstacles ..............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tekst Važećeg Statuta Sa Ugrađenim
    Na osnovu člana 191. stav 1. Ustava Republike Srbije (“Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 98/2006) i člana 32. stav 1. tačka 1) Zakona o lokalnoj samoupravi (“Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 129/2007), Skupština grada Subotice, na 3. sednici održanoj dana 25.09.2008. godine, donela je STATUT GRADA SUBOTICE I OSNOVNE ODREDBE Član 1. Grad Subotica (u daljem tekstu: Grad) je teritorijalna jedinica u kojoj građani ostvaruju pravo na lokalnu samoupravu, u skladu sa Ustavom, zakonom i sa Statutom Grada Subotice (u daljem tekstu: Statut). Član 2. Teritoriju Grada, u skladu sa zakonom, čine naseljena mesta, odnosno područja katastarskih opština koje ulaze u njen sastav, i to: Redni Naziv naseljenog mesta Naziv naseljenog mesta na Naziv katastarske opštine broj na srpskom i hrvatskom mađarskom jeziku jeziku 1. Bajmok Bajmok Bajmok 2. Mišićevo Mišićevo Bajmok 3. Bački Vinogradi Királyhalom Bački Vinogradi 4. Bikovo Békova Bikovo 5. Gornji Tavankut Felsőtavankút Tavankut 6. Donji Tavankut Alsótavankút Tavankut 7. Ljutovo Mérges Tavankut 8. Hajdukovo Hajdújárás Palić 9. Šupljak Ludas Palić 10. Đurđin Györgyén Đurđin 11. Kelebija Kelebia Stari grad (deo) 12. Mala Bosna Kisbosznia Donji grad (deo) 13. Novi Žednik Újzsednik Žednik 14. Stari Žednik Nagyfény Žednik 15. Palić Palics Palić 16. Subotica Szabadka Donji grad (deo) Novi grad (deo) Stari grad (deo) 17. Čantavir Csantavér Čantavir 18. Bačko Dušanovo Dusanovó Čantavir 19. Višnjevac Visnyevác Čantavir Član 3. Naziv Grada je: GRAD SUBOTICA - na srpskom jeziku GRAD SUBOTICA - na hrvatskom jeziku SZABADKA VÁROS- na mađarskom jeziku. 1 Član 4. Sedište Grada je u Subotici, Trg slobode 1. Član 5. Grad ima svojstvo pravnog lica.
    [Show full text]
  • Act Cciii of 2011 on the Elections of Members Of
    Strasbourg, 15 March 2012 CDL-REF(2012)003 Opinion No. 662 / 2012 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ACT CCIII OF 2011 ON THE ELECTIONS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT OF HUNGARY This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2012)003 - 2 - The Parliament - relying on Hungary’s legislative traditions based on popular representation; - guaranteeing that in Hungary the source of public power shall be the people, which shall pri- marily exercise its power through its elected representatives in elections which shall ensure the free expression of the will of voters; - ensuring the right of voters to universal and equal suffrage as well as to direct and secret bal- lot; - considering that political parties shall contribute to creating and expressing the will of the peo- ple; - recognising that the nationalities living in Hungary shall be constituent parts of the State and shall have the right ensured by the Fundamental Law to take part in the work of Parliament; - guaranteeing furthermore that Hungarian citizens living beyond the borders of Hungary shall be a part of the political community; in order to enforce the Fundamental Law, pursuant to Article XXIII, Subsections (1), (4) and (6), and to Article 2, Subsections (1) and (2) of the Fundamental Law, hereby passes the following Act on the substantive rules for the elections of Hungary’s Members of Parliament: 1. Interpretive provisions Section 1 For the purposes of this Act: Residence: the residence defined by the Act on the Registration of the Personal Data and Resi- dence of Citizens; in the case of citizens without residence, their current addresses.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the Republic of Croatia
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA ANNEXES REGIONAL FILES VOLUME 2 PART I EASTERN SLAVONIA 1 MARCH 2001 II CONTENTS ETHNIC STRUCTURES 1 Eastern Slavonia 3 Tenja 4 Antin 5 Dalj 6 Berak 7 Bogdanovci 8 Šarengrad 9 Ilok 10 Tompojevci 11 Bapska 12 Tovarnik 13 Sotin 14 Lovas 15 Tordinci 16 Vukovar 17 WITNESS STATEMENTS TENJA 19 Annex 1: Witness Statement of M.K. 21 Annex 2: Witness Statement of R.J. 22 Annex 3: Witness Statement of I.K. (1) 24 Annex 4: Witness Statement of J.P. 29 Annex 5: Witness Statement of L.B. 34 Annex 6: Witness Statement of P.Š. 35 Annex 7: Witness Statement of D.M. 37 Annex 8: Witness Statement of M.R. 39 Annex 9: Witness Statement of M.M. 39 Annex 10: Witness Statement of M.K. 41 Annex 11: Witness Statement of I.I.* 42 Annex 12: Witness Statement of Z.B. 52 Annex 13: Witness Statement of A.M. 54 Annex 14: Witness Statement of J.S. 56 Annex 15: Witness Statement of Z.M. 58 Annex 16: Witness Statement of J.K. 60 IV Annex 17: Witness Statement of L.R. 63 Annex 18: Witness Statement of Đ.B. 64 WITNESS STATEMENTS DALJ 67 Annex 19: Witness Statement of J.P. 69 Annex 20: Witness Statement of I.K. (2) 71 Annex 21: Witness Statement of A.K. 77 Annex 22: Witness Statement of H.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Differences in Hungary: the Current Stage of Local Food Production at the County-Level
    Regional differences in Hungary: the current stage of local food production at the county-level ZSÓFIA BENEDEK1,$, BÁLINT BALÁZS2 1: Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary 2: Environmental Social Science Research Group, Hungary $: corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] Paper prepared for presentation for the 142nd EAAE Seminar Growing Success? Agriculture and rural development in an enlarged EU May 29-30, 2014 Corvinus University of Budapest Budapest, Hungary Copyright 2014 by Zsófia Benedek and Bálint Balázs. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. 1 Abstract There is an increasing political interest in Hungary to relocalize food. Previous achievements on the Food Relocalization Index (Ricketts Hein et al., 2006) is used and applied to Hungary to map the local food activity. We focus on different indicators of production to consider the extent of small-scale food-related activity. Biophysical limits (the ratio of agricultural areas) are also considered to reveal areas where funds can be allocated to ensure efficiency. Eastern Hungary has the highest potential for further development as it has relatively high level of food activity and food production capacity. Keywords: short food supply chains; small-scale farmers; regional differences; Rural Development Program; quantitative analysis Introduction In the last years a rapid spread of short food supply chains (SFSCs) was witnessed; and also, an increasing political interest to relocalize food. The latest EU study describing the state-of- the-art of SFSCs in the EU understands them as food chains where the number of intermediaries (most typically retailers) is minimized (ideally to zero); and food production, processing, trade and retail occur within a particular narrowly defined geographical area (Kneafsey et al., 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • BTC EGTC, Region's Bridge of Innovation
    BTC EGTC, 20 region’s bridge 18 of innovation Preface City mayors from three countries collaboration. This is particularly have created the idea of the important for us, since we want to Grouping in 2009. keep economical, commercial, social The Grouping was established in contacts in the region covered by order to achieve their main goal BTC EGTC group. - the reducing of development The Grouping’s primary goal is a diff erences in the area surrounding harmonical regional development, the Hungarian-Romanian-Serbian improvement of the economical, border. social and territorial cohesion, as The establishment of BTC EGTC well as enabling a successful cross- provides such opportunities, which border collaboration. help to remove the borders in the region, and build bridges between BTC EGTC the local authorities, in their organization 2 BTC EGTC Introduction On 17th June 2009, almost fi fty mayors from the triple-border region municipalities decided to establish a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) named „Banat - Triplex Confi nium” in a summit in Mórahalom. The headquarters of the Group is also in Mórahalom. The initial membership of BTC EGTC contained 37 Hungarian municipalities, 37 Romanian municipalities, as well as 8 Serbian towns as observing members. Another three Hungarian municipalities joined the Group in 2012 - Csengele, Kistelek and Zá- kányszék. Banat-Triplex Confi nium EGTC members are the following: BTC EGTC, region’s bridge of innovation 2018 Hungary • Ambrózfalva • Ferencszállás • Kunbaja • Öttömös • Apátfalva
    [Show full text]
  • 2019. Január 21-Től a Következő Fiókjainkat Érintik a Változások
    2019. január 21-től a következő Fiókjainkat érintik a változások Megszűnő fiók Új ügyfélszolgálati hely információi Elérhetőségek Nyitva tartás Hétfő: 7.30-16.30 Kedd: 7.30-15.30 Szerda: 7.30-15.30 6000 Kecskemét, Széchenyi sétány 5/A. Csütörtök: 7.30-15.30 6044 Hetényegyháza, Szegfű utca 4. Tel.szám: +36 76 478-056 Péntek: 7.30-12.00 Hétfő: 7.30-16.30 Kedd: 7.30-15.30 Szerda: 7.30-15.30 6065 Lakitelek, Liget utca 2. Csütörtök: 7.30-15.30 6032 Nyárlőrinc, Dózsa György utca 12/a. Tel.szám: +36 76 449 135 Péntek: 7.30-12.00 Hétfő: 7.30-15.30 Kedd: 7.30-15.30 Szerda: 7.30-15.30 6521 Vaskút, Alkotmány utca 3/A. Csütörtök 7.30-15.30 6522 Gara, Páncsics Miklós utca 2. Tel.szám: +36 79 572 040 Péntek: 7.30-13.00 Hétfő: 7.30-16.30 Szerda: 7.30-15.30 6455 Katymár, Szent István Király utca 6456 Madaras, Dózsa György utca 2. Péntek: 7.30-12.00 27. Tel.szám: +36 79 558 020 Hétfő: 7.30-16.30 Kedd: 7.30-15.30 Szerda: 7.30-15.30 6100 Kiskunfélegyháza, Fekete Pál sétány 2. fszt. 1. Csütörtök: 7.30-15.30 6115 Kunszállás, Dózsa György utca 27. Tel.szám: +36 76 463 411 Péntek: 7.30-12.00 Hétfő: 7.30-16.30 6447 Felsőszentiván, Szabadság utca 9. Szerda: 7.30-15.30 6448 Csávoly, Eötvös József utca 1. Tel.szám: +36 79 353 799 Péntek: 7.30-12.00 Hétfő: 7.30-16.30 Kedd: 7.30-15.30 Szerda: 7.30-15.30 6527 Nagybaracska, Szabadság tér 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 01:00-06:30 M5 Autópálya Kecskemét És Lajosmizse Közötti Szakasza 08:30-12:00 M5 Autópálya Kecskemét És Lajosmizse Közötti Szakasza Április 01
    Bács-Kiskun Megyei Rendőr-főkapitányság Rendészeti Igazgatóság Közlekedésrendészeti Osztály ÜTEMTERV a sebességellenőrző berendezések 2016. április havi vezényléséhez Bács-Kiskun Megyei Rendőr-főkapitányság Rendészeti Igazgatóság Közlekedésrendészeti Osztály Autópálya Alosztály 2016. április hónapra tervezett sebességmérések Nap Mérés tervezett ideje Mérés tervezett helye 01:00-06:30 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza 08:30-12:00 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza április 01. péntek 13:00-18:30 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza 21:00-24:00 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza 01:00-06:30 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza 08:30-12:00 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza április 02. szombat 13:00-18:30 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza 21:00-24:00 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza 01:00-06:30 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza 08:30-12:00 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza április 03. vasárnap 13:00-18:30 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza 21:00-24:00 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza 01:00-06:30 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza 08:30-12:00 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza április 04. hétfő 13:00-18:30 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza 21:00-24:00 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza 01:00-06:30 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza 08:30-12:00 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza április 05. kedd 13:00-18:30 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza 21:00-24:00 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza 01:00-06:30 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza 08:30-12:00 M5 autópálya Kecskemét és Lajosmizse közötti szakasza április 06.
    [Show full text]
  • European Commission
    C 171/12 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union 19.5.2020 OTHER ACTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (2020/C 171/07) This communication is published in accordance with Article 17(5) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (1). COMMUNICATING THE APPROVAL OF A STANDARD AMENDMENT ‘Duna/Dunai’ Reference number PDO-HU-A1345-AM02 Date of communication: 9.2.2020 DESCRIPTION OF AND REASONS FOR THE APPROVED AMENDMENT 1. Addition of the municipalities of Kömpöc, Petőfiszállás, Pálmonostora, Újszilvás and Bácsszentgyörgy to the demarcated area (a) Product specification headings affected: IV. Demarcated area (b) Single document heading affected: Demarcated geographical area (c) Reasons: — The Wine Community Council of the Kunság Region (Kunsági Borvidék Hegyközségi Tanácsa) amended the product specification for the ‘Kunság/Kunsági’ PDO. The areas of the municipalities of Kömpöc, Petőfiszállás, Pálmonostora and Újszilvás classified as Class I and II according to the vineyard cadastre of wine-producing regions were added to the demarcated area. The change affects the demarcated area in the product specification for the ‘Duna/Dunai’ PDO and has been included in this application. The characteristics of the areas included in the vineyard cadastre correspond to the demarcated area of the ‘Duna/Dunai’ PDO. Vine-growing is one of the traditional economic activities of local inhabitants. The classification of the wine region and the possibility to produce the ‘Duna/Dunai’ PDO generates significant employment and income in these municipalities and contributes greatly towards the local tourism industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Organic Production on Soil Structure
    1168 Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 20 (No 5) 2014, 1168-1174 Agricultural Academy EFFECT OF ORGANIC PRODUCTION ON SOIL STRUCTURE Lj. NESIC*, M. BELIC, L. SAVIN, V. CIRIC, M. STEFANOVCIC and M. MANOJLOVIC University of Novi Sad, Department of Field and Vegetable Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia Abstract NESIC, Lj., M. BELIC, L. SAVIN, V. CIRIC, M. STEFANOVCIC and M. MANOJLOVIC, 2014. Effect of organic production on soil structure. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 20: 1168-1174 Organic agriculture is a production system, which avoids the use of synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, growth regulators, and additives and relies on natural principles that contribute to the growth, development, and health of plants. Its aim is safe production of quality produce and maintenance and improvement of the sanitary condition and quality of soil and the environ- ment. Soil structure is most important among the physical soil properties due to its large impact on the water, air and thermal status, chemical and biological properties of the soil, soil tilth and the growth of plant roots. It is an indicator of soil fertility and productivity. The objective of this study was to determine the contribution of organic agriculture to soil structure improvement by comparing soil structure indicators from organic farms and conventionally tilled production plots. The study was conduct- ed in Vojvodina Province, Serbia. Organic farms in 8 locations (Kelebija, Orom, Pančevo, Crepaja, Bajmok, Ljutovo, Totovo Selo, and Kisač) were compared against Rimski Šančevi experiment station in which the conventional soil tillage system has been employed for several decades. Soil samples were collected from soil depth of 0-30 cm.
    [Show full text]
  • Településfüldrajzi Sajátosságok a Dél-Alföldi
    Földrajzi Értesítő XLII1. évf. 1994.1-2. füzet, pp. 101-115. Településföldrajzi sajátosságok a dél-alföldi Duna-völgy közép- falvaiban IVÁN LÁSZLÓ Bevezetés A közép- és nagyfalvak, amelyek az Alföld jellegzetes településformáját jelentik, eddig a településtu- dományi vizsgálódásokban kevés figyelmet kaptak. Jelen értekezés a Dél-Duna-völggyel - nagyjából a Csepel-sziget D-i csúcsa és az országhatár közötti, a folyam két partjától mintegy 25-25 km-es távolságban elhelyezkedő területsávval - kíván foglalkozni. A terület klasszikusan nagy- és középfalvas vidék (Mezőföld, Kalocsai- és Tolnai-Sárköz, Solti-sík, Bácskai löszös síkság). A dél-alföldi Duna-völgyben összesen 45 (2000-5000 lakosú) középfalu található, közülük 25-öt válogattunk ki részletesebb elemzés céljából. A vizsgálandó 25 község a középfalvak nagyobb (3000-5000 lakosú) kategóriájába tartozik. Ezek név szerint: Adony, Akasztó, Bácsbokod, Bölcske, Császár- töltés, Dávod, Decs, Dunapataj, Dunavecse, Dusnok, Előszállás, Fadd, Gara, Hajós, Harta, Hercegszántó, Katymár, Madaras, Mezőfalva, Nagybaracska, Perkáta, Rácalmás, Sükösd, Szalkszentmárton és Vaskút. 1988-ban elkészült az említett terület első fejlődéstörténeti tanulmánya (IVÁN L. 1988), amely a 20. sz. közepéig tekintette át a vidék népességtelepítéseinek, gazdálkodástörténetének, ill. kettejük kölcsönhatá- sának legfontosabb eseményeit. Munkám e tanulmány szerves folytatása, amely a településföldrajzi sajátos- ságok elemzésén keresztül kívánja érzékeitemi a térség középfalvainak mai helyzetét. A vizsgált terület településhálózatának kialakulása és főbb sajátosságai Az egyes községek topográfiai fekvését nagyobbrészt a folyam-menti helyzet határozta meg. A Dél-Alföldre igen jellemző, hogy a falvak az árvízmentes perem ártérre néző leszakadásait „ülik meg". Ilyen települések pl. a Bácskai löszhát (Telecskai halmok) Ny-i szélére, a Kecel-bajai magaspartra épült Császártöltés, Sükösd, ill. annak D-i elvégződésére, az ún.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbian Language in Education in Hungary
    The Serbian language in education in Hungary European Research Centre on Multilingualism and Language Learning hosted by SERBIAN The Serbian language in education in Hungary c/o Fryske Akademy Doelestrjitte 8 P.O. Box 54 NL-8900 AB Ljouwert/Leeuwarden The Netherlands T 0031 (0) 58 - 234 3027 W www.mercator-research.eu E [email protected] | Regional dossiers series | t ca r cum n n i- ual e : Available in this series: This document was published by the Mercator European Research Centre on Multilingualism Albanian; the Albanian language in education in Italy and Language Learning with financial support from the Fryske Akademy and the Province Asturian; the Asturian language in education in Spain (2nd ed.) of Fryslân. Basque; the Basque language in education in France (2nd ed.) Basque; the Basque language in education in Spain (2nd ed.) Breton; the Breton language in education in France (2nd ed.) Catalan; the Catalan language in education in France Catalan; the Catalan language in education in Spain (2nd ed.) © Mercator European Research Centre on Multilingualism Cornish; the Cornish language in education in the UK and Language Learning, 2014 Corsican; the Corsican language in education in France (2nd ed.) Croatian; the Croatian language in education in Austria ISSN: 1570 – 1239 Frisian; the Frisian language in education in the Netherlands (4th ed.) 1st edition Friulian; the Friulian language in education in Italy Gaelic; the Gaelic language in education in the UK The contents of this dossier may be reproduced in print, except for commercial purposes, Galician; the Galician language in education in Spain provided that the extract is proceeded by a complete reference to the Mercator European German; the German language in education in Alsace, France (2nd ed.) Research Centre on Multilingualism and Language Learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Technical Summary
    NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY According to the current regulation of categorization railway (“Official Gazette of RS", no. 75/2006) railroad Subotica (Cargo) - Horgoš - the Hungarian border is a regional railroad with the tag 56, and its length is 27.90 km. This railway has a category A, the maximum permissible weight of 16 t/axle, and the maximum weight per meter of 5.0 t/m '. Length stopping distance is 700 m. The railroad is single track and non-electrified. According to the ToR, the preliminary project of reconstruction and modernization of the railway line, within the limits of the railway land, which enable technical level and quality of traffic that is consistent with the established requirements of modern transport systems: • increase the speed of trains, • increasing axle loads, • increasing the length of trains, • increase line capacity, • increase safety on the line, • reducing the travel time of trains and energy consumption, • reducing the adverse environmental impact. In the investigated corridor of railway Subotica (Cargo) - Horgoš - Hungarian border potential of surface waters are natural waterways and melioration canals: Kereš – Radanovački canal, Tapša, Vinskipodrum, Kireš, Aranjšor, Dobo, Kamaraš and other melioration canals. Groundwater is particularly present in the lower parts of the terrain that are genetically related to the marsh sediments. The materials are mainly characterized by intergranular porosity, and depending on the amount of clay in individual members is conditioned their varying degree of permeability of the filtration coefficients of k = 10-4 - 10-7 cm / sec. The occurrence of groundwater was registered during the execution of research work at a depth of 0.90 to a depth of 1.90 m, extremely 4.20 m from terrain surface where drilling is performed.
    [Show full text]