Social Inclusion in Bosnia and Herzegovina, English
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
APPENDICES: Research and Case Studies of 2020 National Human Development Report on Social Inclusion 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendix 1: NHDR 2019 Survey ................................................................................. 3 Appendix 2: NHDR Questionnaire 2019 ................................................................. 6 Appendix 3A: Bijeljina Community Profile ........................................................37 Appendix 3B: Gradačac Community Profile ......................................................51 Appendix 3C: Ilijaš Community Profile ................................................................62 Appendix 3D: Laktaši Community Profile ...........................................................70 Appendix 3E: Ljubuški Community Profile .........................................................84 Appendix 3F: Nevesinje Community Profile ......................................................93 Appendix 3G: Tešanj Community Profile .......................................................... 104 Appendix 4: Citizens’ Voices Survey .................................................................... 114 Appendix 5: Center for Social Work and Education Specialist focus group recommendations ........................................................................... 119 2 NHDR 2019 Questionnaire Social Inclusion in BiH 3rd September 2019 Appendix 1: NHDR 2019 Survey The NHDR 2019 Social Inclusion Survey is a continuation of the NHDR 2009 Social Capital Survey. With the exception of three additional questions, the NHDR 2019 replicates the previous round conducted a decade ago, allowing to compare changes in the trend. The main difference between the two surveys, however, is the sampling frame. The NHDR 2009 Survey covered a nationally representative sample (with a sample size of 1613), whereas NHDR 2019 Survey was conducted in seven municipalities (with a sample size of 333). As such, the NHDR 2019 Survey serves as a guide for a future, nationally representative survey. Following the design of the sampling frame, the NHDR 2019 Survey implemented between September and October 2019. The data entry was finalized in late October – early November 2019. Compared with the NHDR 2009 Survey, the NHDR 2019 sample was somewhat older, with relatively more male and married respondents. The weight of the respondents with a secondary school degree in the NHDR 2009 Survey was lower, 31%, than that of the respondents with the same degree in the NHDR 2019 Survey, 39%. The lower percentage of female respondents in the NHDR 2019 Survey was reflected in the distribution of the labor market status of the sample. Relatively, the representation of respondents engaged in reproductive work were lower in NDHR 2019 than was the case in NHDR 2009. On the other hand, the income level captured in the NHDR 2019 was higher than the level captured in NHDR 2009 survey. Approximately half of the respondents reported their income level between 500 and 1500 KM in NHDR 2019. In NHDR 2009, less than 40% of the respondents reported their income in the same bracket. Because the NHDR 2019 Survey was conducted in select municipalities, the ethnic/national affiliation of the survey diverged from the representation of the NHDR 2009 Survey. The NHDR 2019 Survey replicates most of the questions included in the NHDR 2009 survey. The main difference between the two surveys is the sampling frame. The NHDR 2009 Survey covered a nationally representative sample, whereas NHDR 2019 Survey was conducted in seven municipalities. As such, NHDR 2019 serves as a guide for a future, nationally representative survey. The change in the sampling frames is evident in the characteristics of the sampled populations. Below, we present the comparison of the two surveys. The NHDR 2019 Sample was somewhat older, with relatively more male and married respondents. The weight of the respondents with a secondary school degree in the NHDR 2009 Survey was lower, 31%, than that of the respondents with the same degree in the NHDR 2019 Survey, 39%. The lower percentage of female respondents in the NHDR 2019 Survey was reflected in the distribution of the labor market status of the sample. Relatively, the representation of respondents engaged in reproductive work were lower in NDHR 2019 than was the case in NHDR 2009. On the other hand, the 3 income level captured in the NHDR 2019 was higher than the level captured in NHDR 2009 survey. Approximately half of the respondents reported their income level between 500 and 1500 KM in NHDR 2019. In NHDR 2009, less than 40% of the respondents reported their income in the same bracket. Because the NHDR 2019 Survey was conducted in select municipalities, the ethnic/national affiliation of the survey diverged from the representation of the NHDR 2009 Survey. Relatively more Serbs were present in the NHDR 2019 than was the case in the NHDR 2009. Table A2.1 Sample characteristics 2009 2019 (years) Age 47 53 Gender (%) Male 42 53 Female 58 47 Marital Status (%) Single 24 11 Married 55 62 Cohabitation 1 2 Separated/Divorced 4 3 Widowed 16 17 NA / don’t want to answer 1 7 Education (%) No education 3 3 1-3 grades 4 2 4-7 grades 6 5 Elementary School 17 13 Secondary School 2-3 years 24 22 Completed Secondary School 31 39 Completed High School 4 5 Completed University Education 10 10 MA, Ph.D. degree 1 1 Don’t know / don’t want to answer 1 0 Labor Market Status (%) FT employed 28 29 PT employed 1 5 Informal employment 1 2 Self-employment 1 5 Unemployed 17 15 Retired 29 31 Unpaid work (reproductive work) 10 6 Unable to work 1 2 Student 9 5 4 Other 0 0 Don’t know / don’t want to answer 2 0 Income (%) No Income 4 0 Less than 500 KM 35 18 501- 1100 KM 24 32 1101 - 1500 KM 14 22 1501 - 2000 KM 2 9 2001 KM+ 1 6 Ethnic / National Affiliation (%) Bosniak 43 44 Serb 31 40 Croat 22 14 Other 1 2 None 0 0 Don’t know / don’t want to answer 2 5 Appendix 2: NHDR Questionnaire 2019 Social ties / networks Reciprocity Trust Identity Social cohesion Formal civic association & Volunteering Outcomes Job seeking Access to health services Access to education Local services & Transport + Demographics SOCIAL TIES / NETWORKS Direct Measures: We are interested in finding out more about people’s relations with one another in BiH. Q1) To begin with, can you please tell me, about how many CLOSE FRIENDS do you have these days, if any? These are people you feel at ease with, can talk to about private matters, or call on for help. Would you say that you have no close friends, one or two, three to five, six to ten, or more than that? SINGLE RESPONSE None 1 1-2 2 3-5 3 6-10 4 More 5 Don’t know [do not read] 999 Don’t want to answer [ do not read] 9999 Q2) Of these close friends you just described, how many of them: SINGLE RESPONSE FOR EACH ROW All Most Some Few None Are Serb 5 4 3 2 1 Are Croat 5 4 3 2 1 Are Bosniak 5 4 3 2 1 6 Are of mixed parentage 5 4 3 2 1 Are another ethnicity 5 4 3 2 1 Are male 5 4 3 2 1 Are female 5 4 3 2 1 Live outside BiH 5 4 3 2 1 Have a disability 5 4 3 2 1 Are LGBTQ 5 4 3 2 1 Didn’t complete secondary school 5 4 3 2 1 Have a university degree 5 4 3 2 1 Don’t know [do not read] 999 Don’t wish to answer [do not read] 9999 Q3) Now thinking about your acquaintances. By acquaintances I mean people who you know by name and with whom you have perhaps had coffee with or talked to at some point, but that are not your close friends. When you go out of the house during the day are you likely to run into your acquaintances? SINGLE RESPONSE Yes, always 5 Yes, nearly always 4 Yes, sometimes 3 No, not often 2 No, never 1 Don’t know [do not read] 999 Don’t wish to answer [do not read] 9999 Q4) Thinking about these acquaintances that you run into during the day – what proportion of your acquain- tances are: SINGLE RESPONSE FOR EACH ROW All Most Some Few None Are Serb 5 4 3 2 1 Are Croat 5 4 3 2 1 Are Bosniak 5 4 3 2 1 Are of mixed parentage 5 4 3 2 1 Are another ethnicity 5 4 3 2 1 Are male 5 4 3 2 1 Are female 5 4 3 2 1 Have a disability 5 4 3 2 1 Are LGBTQ 5 4 3 2 1 Live outside BiH 5 4 3 2 1 Didn’t complete secondary school 5 4 3 2 1 Have a university degree 5 4 3 2 1 Don’t know [don’t read] 999 Don’t wish to answer [don’t read] 9999 7 Q5) How often do you spend time with… SINGLE RESPONSE FOR EACH ROW Never Seldom Once a A few A few Almost Don’t know Don’t wish NA month, or times each times a everyday [don’t read] to answer every two month week [don’t read] months Family (mother, father, spouse, sister, broth- 1 2 3 4 5 6 999 9999 99 er, son, daughter) and close relatives (uncle, aunt, niece, nephew, grandparents, grand- children) Neighbors 1 2 3 4 5 6 999 9999 99 Close friends 1 2 3 4 5 6 999 9999 99 People with your own ethnicity 1 2 3 4 5 6 999 9999 99 People with other ethnicities 1 2 3 4 5 6 999 9999 99 8 People who lead a different life than you 1 2 3 4 5 6 999 9999 (different profession, different value system, financial/social status, rural/urban environ- ment different nationality etc). Other (Show card) 1 2 3 4 5 6 999 9999 99 Q6) In the past three months, how many times did you invite the following people into your home for lunch, dinner, coffee or a similar occasion? SINGLE RESPONSE FOR EACH ROW Never Seldom A few A few Almost Don’t know Don’t wish NA times times a everyday [don’t read] to answer each week [don’t read] month Family (mother, father, spouse, sister, brother, son, daughter) 1 2 3 4 5 999 9999 99 / Close relatives (uncle, aunt, niece, nephew, grandparents, grandchildren) Neighbors 1 2 3 4 5 999 9999 99 Close friends 1 2 3 4 5 999 9999 99 People with your own ethnicity 1 2 3 4 5 999 9999 99 9 People with other ethnicities 1 2 3 4 5 999 9999 99 People who lead a different life than you (different profession, 1 2 3 4 5 999 9999 99 different value system, financial/social status, rural/urban environment, nationality etc).