General Assembly Resolutions: Frrst, the Primary Responsi· Comprehensive and Mandatory Programme of Sanctions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Assembly Resolutions: Frrst, the Primary Responsi· Comprehensive and Mandatory Programme of Sanctions United Nations FOURTH COMMITTEE, 1768th GENERAL MEETIN& ASSEMBLY Friday, 18 October 1968, at 10.55 a.m TWENTY-THIRD SESSION Official Records NEW YORK CONTENTS tion 232 (1966). The United Kingdom Government was responsible for the situation and its inaction had given the Page Smith regime just what it needed: namely, time to Agenda item 23: consolidate itself. The United Kingdom Government should Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of not hold talks with members of the minority racist regime Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples: report of the Special Committee on the Situation with regard to but with the true representatives of the people of the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting Zimbabwe. Moreover, the principles which that Govern­ of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples: ment professed to uphold were expressed in vague terms­ Southern Rhodesia (continued) an indication of its complicity. General debate (continued) . ..................... 4. It was the duty of the United Nations to condenm not only the Southern Rhodesian regime, South Africa and Chairman: Mr. P. V. J. SOLOMON Portugal, but all those who were assisting the forces of (Trinidad and Tobago j. racism and colonialism. All nations should implement the relevant resolutions of the United Nations and the United Kingdom, as the administering Power, should compel South Africa to withdraw its troops, who were fighting against the AGENDA ITEM 23 people of Zimbabwe. The delegation of the Ukrainian SSR supported the adoption of measures designed to put an end Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting to the situation. of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples: report of the Special Committee on the 5. Mr. PANDEY (Nepal) said that, ever since the illegal Situation with regard to the Implementation· of declaration of independence, the question of Southern the Declaration on ths Granting of Independence Rhodesia had been growing increasingly serious. The to Colonial Countries and Peoples: Southern professed policy of the United Kingdom Government had been to withhold independence until majority rule had Rhodesia (continued) (A/7200/Rev.1, chap. VI) been established in Southern Rhodesia. Between 1961 and 1965 it had resolutely resisted all United Nations efforts to GENERAL DEBATE (continued) establish majority rule. Even after the unilateral declaration of independence, it had waited a year before bringing the 1. Mr. KORNEENKO (Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Re­ question before the Security Council. Those twelve months public) said that mankind could not tolerate the situati~n had given the rebel regime time to consolidate its position. created by the colonial racist regime in Southern RhodeSia, which constituted a threat to the newly independent 6. Security Council resolutions 232 (1966) and 253 African States. The situation in the Territory reflected the (1968) had not produced the desired results. Moreover, the determination of the forces of colonialism and racism to Smith regime, in its policy of disregarding the legitimate make up for the defeat they had suffered in other parts of aspirations of 95 per cent of the population of Southern Africa. South Africa and Portugal were carrying out those Rhodesia and introducing separate racial development, was policies, obviously influenced by the United States, the receiving the co-operation and support of South Africa and United Kingdom and the Federal Republic of Germany and Portugal. By refusing to recognize the Security Council with the support of NATO. resolutions, those two countries had violated Articles 25 and 49 of the Charter. 2. Monopolies continued to extract the resources of the continent, and the United Kingdom, the United States and 7. The repressive measures adopted by the minority rebel the Federal Republic of Germany had capital invested in regime to safeguard its position in Southern Rhodesia had mining and farming. That explained why those countries left the African majority with no choice but revolt. Their were making every effort to prevent the application of struggle for freedom was meeting with an inhuman response sanctions against South Africa and Portugal, which were from the rebel regime, which had gone so far as to execute helping Southern Rhodesia. African nationalists, in open defiance of constitutional authority. His delegation understood the sentiments of the 3. The passive policy of the United Kingdom, the adminis­ African nationalists and recognized their legitimate aspira· tering Power, permitted the stationing in Southern Rh~ tions and their right to freedom and self-government on the desia of South African troops, which were fJghting against basis of the democratic principle of one man, one vote. the people of Zimbabwe. The Western Powers continued to maintain commercial relations with the Salisbury Govern­ 8. The only measure likely to be understood by the illegal ment, despite the provisions of Security Council resolu- regime was the use of force. It was to be hoped that the A/C.4/SR.1768 --------2 -----------------Gene--ral Assembly - Twenty-third Session - Fourth Committee United Kingdom Government would not shift the whole against the "pressure groups" of which the Reverend burden of responsibility to the United Nations. Since the Michael Scott had spoken a few days earUer (l763rd mandatory sanctions had proved ineffective, there remained meeting), since those groups were working against the no choice bu t to use forc.e. inalienable rights of the African majority in Southern Rhodesia. 9. The time had come to urge the Security Council to consider extending the sanctions to include tile srverance of 14. The Uni ted Kingdom had drawn up the six principles all communir.ations with Southern Rhodesia. The Council because it mistakenly believed that the problem of might also exhort, in stricter tenns, Member States and Sou them Rhodesia could be solved only by political means. •1on-Mer.1ber States, p:trticularly tho:;e having trade rela­ It seemed no· '• however, that emphasis was being placed on tions w'th Southern Rhodesia, to c~ rry out its decisions only two of those pl'i 1: ciples; shortly there would be faithfully. Lastly, since South Africa and Portugal had been emphasis on none of them. What was happening was that, providing the illegal rt<gime with lo.>p-holes whereby to by that means, tl1e Smith regime was being given an defeat the purpose of the decisions, the sanctions might be opportunity to consolidate itself; that was a sell-out. After extended to cover those two countries as welL each of the talks, Ian Smith took away a docume nt for 10. Mr. COLE (Sic'To Leone) said that, following the study and the reaction was always the same: disagreement recent di :cussions between the United Kingdom Prime with its proposals. A few months would then elapse and Minister and the Southern Rhodesiat rebel leader, their Southem Rhodesia would take a further dramatic step to respective positions were clear-cut. Mr Wilson continued to consolidate the illegal r~gime. maintain his six principles, while Jan Smith, the ma n whom the United Kingdom Government had called a rebel and I 5. His Government l.lOntinued to rega rd the racist regime whose acts had been officially desc1 ibed as treasonable, as a fra ud perpetrated by a white minority against the stated that he did not expect to see Africans controlling the entire African population; it once again urged the United Government during his lifetime. Kingdom to live up to the expectations of all the countries which looked to it to put an end to the regime, through the 11. The third anniversary of the uni ateral declaration of use of sanctions or otherwise. The way in which the United independence in Southern Rhodesia was not far off and the Kingdom Government had applied the sanctions showed racist minority regime would again be congratulating itself clearly how ineffectual such sanctions were ; the United on the security, stability and boomi ng economy of the Kingdom must revise and streng,then them if it wished to Territory. On 4 October 1967 ( Ho83rd meeting), the maintain its reputation as a just arbiter in Africa. United Kingdom representative, speaJ. ing on the question of Southern Rhodesia, had said that the sanctions would 16. The right to freedom and to self-determination were require some time before they had eff<:ct and had sought to basic hu.man rights and it was alarming that the legitimate show that trade with Southern Rhcdesia had decreased demands of the courageous fighters in southern Africa for considerably, particularly in respect c f imports. The reply recognition of those rights should be met by acts of of Jan Smith's regime to those staterrents appeared in the savagery, bestiality and murder such as were taking place in report of the Special Committee (A/7l00/Rev.l, chap. Vl, Southern Rhodesia at the present time, and that they para. I 0 I). The following paragraphs provided information should be condoned and abetted by the nations which about aircraft delivered by Italy, Japanese and French spoke so glibly about the "free world". automobiles reaching the territory without difficulty, and the negligible decrease in imports from the United Kingdom 17. Mr. TURKSON {Ghana), referring to the statement into Southern Rhodesia. The sanctions had been in force made by the Under-Secretary-General for Trusteeship and fo r two years and the onus of proof c.f their effect, if any, Non-Self-Governing Territories at the 1759th meeting rested fully wi th the United Kingdom. (A/CA/707), said that the priority which had been ac­ corded to the item demonstrated the groWing concern felt 12. In his statement at the l759th meeting, the United by all about the deteriorating situation in southern Africa Kingdom representative had subtly informed the United and especi~y in Southern Rhodesia.
Recommended publications
  • George Loft Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt6b69r101 No online items Inventory of the George Loft papers Finding aid prepared by Hoover Institution Library and Archives Staff Hoover Institution Library and Archives © 2007 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 [email protected] URL: http://www.hoover.org/library-and-archives Inventory of the George Loft 2006C21 1 papers Title: George Loft papers Date (inclusive): 1957-1989 Collection Number: 2006C21 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Library and Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 11 manuscript boxes(4.4 Linear Feet) Abstract: Correspondence, memoranda, reports, interview summaries, printed matter, and photographs, relating to American Friends Service Committee activities in Africa, especially relating to housing in Zambia; international development projects in Africa; and political and social conditions in Zambia, Zimbabwe and elsewhere in Africa. Creator: Loft, George Hoover Institution Library & Archives Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Library & Archives. Acquisition Information Acquired by the Hoover Institution Library & Archives in 2005. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], George Loft Papers, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Library & Archives. 1915 Born, New York City January 27 1931 Graduated, High School of Commerce, New York 1932-1942 Assistant to Economist, National Dairy Products Corporation, New York 1938 Graduated, Bachelor's degree in Accounting, New York University 1940 Completed Master of Business Administration, New York University 1942 Married Eleanor Riddle 1942-1945 Chief of Subsistence Requirements Section, Military Planning Division, Office of the Quartermaster General, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • National Identity and Post-Colonial Development: Dictatorial Zimbabwe and Democratic Republic of South Africa Master's Thesis
    National Identity and Post-Colonial Development: Dictatorial Zimbabwe and Democratic Republic of South Africa Master’s Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Department of Global Studies Chandler Rosenberger, Advisor Jasmine Waddell, Advisor Richard Parmentier, Chairman In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Master’s Degree By Andrea Cohen August, 2011 Copyright by Andrea Cohen © 2011 Dedication I would like to dedicate this piece of work to my parents, Fran and Les Cohen. Their hard work and endless support has allowed me to take up any opportunity that comes my way, including my desire to earn a Master’s degree. My Dad has shown me through example the importance of a strong work ethic. His quotes comparing hard work to sports always hang above my desk. Both my parent’s high regard for the needs of others has in part inspired me with a passion to better the lives of those who live in poverty, fear and oppression. I am eternally grateful for their enduring love, guidance, support. Acknowledgements I would like to thank my graduate advisers for their role in my education and for their guidance and support throughout the process. Professors Jasmine Waddell and Chandler Rosenberger’s intellect always inspired me to keep learning, think harder, and dig deeper. I cannot possibly thank Professor Waddell enough for her enduring support throughout the writing process. Each conversation with her left me feeling renewed, validated, and ready to tackle the challenge ahead. Professor Rosenberger always pushed me to achieve the perfection he knew I was capable of, and for that I am thankful to him.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Colonies, Northern Rhodesia, 1931
    COLONIAL REPORTS-ANNUAL No. 1592 ANNUAL REPORT ON THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC PROGRESS OF THE PEOPLE OF NORTHERN RHODESIA, (For Reports for 7929 and 1930 see Nos. 1516 and 1561, respectively, Price 2s. od. each). Crown Copyright Reserved LONDON PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY HIS MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE To be purchased directly from H.M. STATIONERY OFFICE at the following addresses Adastral House, Kingsway, London, W.C.a; iao, Gecrge Stiect, Edinburgh a York Street, Manchester; i, St. Andrew's Crescent, Cardiff 15, Donegall Square West, Belfast or through any Bookseller 1932 Price 2s. od. Net 58-I592 ANNUAL REPORT ON THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC PROGRESS OF THE PEOPLE OF NORTHERN RHODESIA, 1931 CONTENTS. Chapter Page- I.—GEOGRAPHY, CLIMATE, AND HISTORY 2 IT. •—GOVERNMENT ... 6 IH.™POPULATION ... ... 7 IV—HEALTH 8 V.—HOUSING 10 VI.—PRODUCTION ... ... 12 VII.—COMMERCE 23 VIII.—WAGES AND COST OF LrvrNG 27 IX.—EDUCATION AND WELFARE INSTITUTIONS ... 29 X .—COMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSPORT ... ., 31 XI— BANKING, CURRENCY, AND WEIGHTS AND MEASURES ... 30 XII.—PUBLIC WORKS 37 XIII.—JUSTICE, POLICE, AND PRISONS 38 XIV.—LEGISLATION 40 XV—PUBLIC FINANCE AND TAXATION 46 MAP CHAPTER I. GEOGRAPHY, CLIMATE, AND HISTORY. Geography, The territory known as the Protectorate of Northern Rhodesia lies between longitudes 22° E. and 33° 33' E. and between latitudes 8° 15' S. and 18° S. It is bounded on the west by Angola, on the north-west by the Belgian Congo, on the north-east by Tanganyika Territory, on the east by the Nyasaland Protectorate and Portuguese East Africa, and on the south by Southern Rhodesia and the man­ dated territory of South-West Africa, comprising in all an area that is computed to be about 288,400 square miles.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Rhodesia: the Post-War Background, 1945–1953
    2 Northern Rhodesia: The Post-War Background, 1945–1953 Andrew D. Roberts It is many years since I said anything new about the colonial history of Zambia, so I was flattered to be invited to contribute to this collection as well as to the conference on which it is based. There seemed to be two ways in which I could try to be useful. I shall sketch the background to Northern Rhodesia in the 1950s, by way of providing a context for the research papers which follow. And along the way I shall take note of themes and topics which still call for study, despite the recent revival of interest in late-colonial Zambia. Let us begin with the copper industry, which for a century has been so impor- tant a factor in Zambia’s history.1 We must recognise that it only began to prosper in 1949. During the last two years of World War II the mines were badly run down: existing workings were yielding diminishing grades of ore, and large-scale development was needed to gain access to ores of a quality which would – as in 1 A.D. Roberts, ‘Notes towards a financial history of copper mining in Northern Rhodesia’, Canadian Journal of African Studies, 16 (1982); L.J. Butler, Copper empire: Mining and the colonial state in Northern Rhodesia, c.1930–1964 (Basingstoke, 2007). 16 andrew d. roberts the later 1930s – compensate for the high costs of transport. Hence, from 1945 to 1949 the Rhodesian Selection Trust, which dominated two of the four operating mines, paid no dividends: it devoted net profits to mining development.
    [Show full text]
  • Collapse of Rhodesia: Society in Nigeria Population Demographics and the Usmana.Tar Politics of Race 978 1 84511 656 9 Josiah Brownell 978 1 84885 475 8 23
    Josiah Brownell received his Ph.D. from the School of Oriental and African Studies in 2009, and has a J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law. His research focuses on African history, comparative settler colonialism, and the end of the British Empire. P1: PHB Trim: 138mm × 216mm Top: 1in Gutter: 1in IBBK042-01 IBBK042-Serieslist-Demis ISBN: 978 1 84885 217 4 August 13, 2010 17:24 INTERNATIONAL LIBRARY OF AFRICAN STUDIES Series ISBN: 978 1 84885 217 4 See www.ibtauris.com/ILAS for a full list of titles 18. Mineworkers in Zambia: Labour 25. African Women and Apartheid: and Political Change in Post-Colonial Migration and Settlement in Urban Africa South Africa Miles Larmer Rebekah Lee 978 1 84511 299 8 978 1 84511 819 8 19. Reconstructing the Nation in 26. Islam’s Perfect Stranger: The Life Africa: The Politics of Nationalism in of Mahmud Muhammad Taha, Ghana Muslim Reformer of Sudan Michael Amoah Edward Thomas 978 1 84511 259 2 978 1 84885 004 0 20. Revolt and Protest: Student 27. The Governance of Water and Politics and Activism in Sub-Saharan Sanitation in Africa: Achieving Africa Sustainable Development through Leo Zeilig Partnerships 978 1 84511 476 3 Tim Gray and Amy Stewart 978 1 84885 027 9 22. The Politics of Neoliberal Democracy in Africa: State and Civil 28. The Collapse of Rhodesia: Society in Nigeria Population Demographics and the UsmanA.Tar Politics of Race 978 1 84511 656 9 Josiah Brownell 978 1 84885 475 8 23. Afrikaners in the New South Africa: Identity Politics in a 29.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 16: Zimbabwe Sub-Saharan Report
    Marubeni Research Institute 2016/09/02 Sub -Saharan Report Sub-Saharan Africa is one of the focal regions of Global Challenge 2015. These reports are by Mr. Kenshi Tsunemine, an expatriate employee working in Johannesburg with a view across the region. Vol. 16: Zimbabwe November 12, 2015 “The Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe officially abolished the Zimbabwe dollar with a redemption rate of 35 quadrillion Zimbabwe dollars to 1 U.S. dollar.” Some of you may have heard this surprising news around the beginning of June (note 1). Now with 30.5101 billion (30,510,100,000) Zimbabwe dollars I have thought I was a billionaire, but now rue this day ever coming (picture 1) (note 2) . It is this deeply impressionable, but hyper-inflated country Zimbabwe that I will introduce this time. Picture 1: Zimbabwe notes worth 30,510,100,000 Zimbabwe dollars Table 1: Zimbabwe Country Information Zimbabwe is a landlocked country located in southern Africa surrounded by Zambia in the north, Mozambique in the east, South Africa in the south and Botswana on its western border. Although its land size is about the same as Japan’s, its population is only one-tenth that of Japan’s and its nominal GDP only one three hundred sixtieth that of Japan’s (table 1). Zimbabwe has a temperate climate with a summer rainy season. The capital of Harare is located at 1,500 meters above sea level with low temperatures of around 7 degrees centigrade in the winter and highs of up to 30 degrees or more in the summer months.
    [Show full text]
  • Teachers' Notes Empire and Commonwealth: East
    TEACHERS’ NOTES EMPIRE AND COMMONWEALTH: EAST AFRICAN CAMPAIGN, 1917 3 August 1914 – November 1918 Background • In 1914 Germany possessed four colonies in sub-SaHaran Africa. THese were Togoland, Kamerun, SoutH-West Africa (now Namibia), and East Africa (now Tanzania). • Capturing Germany’s colonies was an important part of tHe general strategy to starve Germany, and dry up its supplies of fuel and ammunition. By cutting Germany off from all external support, it was speed up tHe process. • Togoland was tHe first German territory captured during tHe war, falling into Allied Hands on 26 August 1914. • British, SoutH African and Portuguese troops captured German SoutH West Africa by July 1915, and British, Nigerian, Indian, French, French Colonial, Belgian and Belgian Colonial forces Had taken Kamerun by March 1916. • WitH most of Germany’s Pacific and Asian colonies also Having fallen to Australian, New Zealand and Japanese troops, the German East Africa colony became tHe last un-captured part of tHe German Colonial Empire TEACHERS’ NOTES from mid-1916 – in fact, it was tHe only part of tHe German Empire to remain undefeated for tHe wHole war. • Lt Col Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck took command of tHe German military forces, determined to tie down as many British resources as possible. His force was mainly comprised of tHe Schutztruppe (Protection Force), an African colonial armed force of local native Askari soldiers commanded by German officers. • THe Askaris were incredibly loyal and very few deserted despite tHe Hardships of tHe campaign. • Completely cut off from Germany and all external supplies, von Lettow conducted an effective guerrilla warfare campaign, living off tHe land, capturing British supplies, and remaining undefeated – a tHree and a Half year game of cat and mouse, wHich He can be considered to Have won.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study Guide by Marguerite O'hara
    © ATOM 2013 A STUDY GUIDE BY MARGUERITE O’HARA http://www.metromagazine.com.au ISBN: 978-1-74295-344-1 http://www.theeducationshop.com.au Historians can tell lies. Overview Their sins are the sins of Once My Mother (2013) is a documentary film by omission. They choose filmmaker Sophia Turkiewicz about her struggle to what to put in, what to leave reconcile with her refugee mother for abandoning her in out. When I go searching an orphanage as a child. The story takes in the sweep of their two lives, beginning with her mother, Helen, born in for your story in the history Poland in the early 1920’s, and covering her epic journey books, the chapter on your from a Siberian gulag to Uzbekistan, Persia and Africa story is missing. before finally finding safety in Australia with her young daughter, Sophia. It is a story of survival and forgiveness. Sophia Turkiewicz The story raises a number of interesting questions about the nature of memoir and biography, about how we tell stories, about memory and forgetting, about knowing some things but not others. In telling her mother Helen’s story, Sophia is also telling us her story. An experienced filmmaker, Sophia draws on a number of sources to tell this story about her relationship with her mother, including 2013 © ATOM SCREEN EDUCATION conversations and interviews with her mother. 2 Did she ever truly know this woman who became her mother? Does she have it in her heart to forgive her? And is it too late? As Sophia re-examines her mother’s life, she discovers the Synopsis historical truth behind Helen’s deportation to a Siberian gulag.
    [Show full text]
  • THE WHITE HOUSE and WHITE AFRICA: PRESIDENTIAL POLICY on RHODESIA 1965-79 By
    THE WHITE HOUSE AND WHITE AFRICA: PRESIDENTIAL POLICY ON RHODESIA 1965-79 by EDWARD R. MICHEL A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham April 2016 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT My thesis offers an examination of U.S. policy towards Rhodesia as viewed through the lens of the respective Presidential administrations. The aim of my research is to demonstrate the changing American perspective on the Rhodesian question and how this directly affected the ultimate emergence of an independent Zimbabwe. I discuss the transformation in U.S. policy from the cautious approach of the Johnson White House, the shift towards ‘white Africa’ during the Nixon years as anti-communism and economic interests took centre stage and the subsequent attempt of the Ford Administration to achieve a peace settlement to prevent further communist expansion into southern Africa. Finally, I will analyse the critical role played by President Carter in bringing an end to UDI.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Ethnicized: the Pursuit of Protection and Participation in Rwanda and Burundi
    Buffalo Journal of International Law Volume 2 Number 1 Article 2 4-1-1995 Power Ethnicized: The Pursuit of Protection and Participation in Rwanda and Burundi Linda Maguire The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bjil Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the Law and Race Commons Recommended Citation Maguire, Linda (1995) "Power Ethnicized: The Pursuit of Protection and Participation in Rwanda and Burundi," Buffalo Journal of International Law: Vol. 2 : No. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bjil/vol2/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Buffalo Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POWER ETHINICIZED: THE PURSUIT OF PROTECTION AND PARTICIPATION IN RWANDA AND BURUNDI Linda Maguire* The Hutu-Tutsi conflict is a relatively recentphenomenon ... not composed of ancestralhatreds and supposedsupremacy, but of modern politics. Ren6 Lemarchand' There's never been any ethnic conflict between the groups on the level of the village. There was no ethnic war before independence. It's the politi- cians who transfertheir politicalconflicts onto the hillsides. If the leaders say nothing then the killings don't happen. Maj. Pierre Buyoya President of Burundi (1987-1993)2 * Editor-in-Chief, 1994-1995, The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University; Master Degree Candidate 1995 at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy; B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • RHODESIA TODAY by Aristone M
    EDITOR'S NOTE Our readers will note that with this, number 8 of the South Africa Bulletin, our scope has been widened, to include all of " Southern" Africa-South West Africa, Rhodesia, Angola, Mozambique, Lesotho, Botswana and Swaziland. All of Southern Africa is inextricably linked together, with South Africa as the hard core of white resistance to majority rule. We feel it therefore important to bring our readers, from time to time, information about various of these related areas and news of the African struggle for freedom in those parts of Southern Africa not yet independent. You may recall that Bulletin no. 7 contained an article on South West Africa. In this issue we bring you one on Rhodesia, written especially for us by a Rh9desian, Mr. Aristone M. Chambati. RHODESIA TODAY By Aristone M. Chamhati Observers of the Rhodesian political scene agree that Act became the Magna Carta of the white minority and the current situation has slipped completely out of British the basis of future discriminatory laws. control and into the hands of a white supremacist group The Pass laws were enacted to control and restrict the rivalled only by South Africa in their extremist racial pol­ movement of the African. These required that every Afri­ icies. All efforts to achieve a negotiated political compro­ can male over the age of 16 should carry a pass (chitupa), mise, acceptable to all groups involved in the conflict, to be produced upon demand of a policeman, or suffer have failed and the latest endeavour, mandatory eco­ the penalty. This legislation severely restricts the move­ nomic sanctions by U.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhodesia to Zimbabwe a Chronology 1830 to 1976
    Rhodesia To Zimbabwe A Chronology 1830 to 1976 by George M. Houser THE AFRICA FUND (Associated with The American Committee on Africa) 305 E. 46th St. * New York, N.Y. 10017 9 Telephone (212) 838-5030 16-~ 16 0N55 7 MASHONALAND NORTH ~ lae KaS / Namibia ~oo 10 T . .. .0 , o ledell ELsv' MASHONALAND OUTH * MILANDS O~on MATABELELANDNORTH *Redd:LU ANClANU.-*-Kt BOTSWANAFotVcri Rs~o~oyo*/ ~For, V'cto,, '..2 Shobon, LKele 1 VICTORI MATABELELAND SOUTH > MOZAMBIQUE SOUTH AFRICA 28 3 Note Provrnces -.- hove no posthon n requlor strvctvre of governmnft Zimbabwe FROM RHODESIA TO ZIMBABWE A conflict of major proportions is now coming to a head in southern Africa, as Africans struggling for a free Zimbabwe confront a white minority government whose sole aim is to protect the political power and economic privilege of the tiny Rhodesian settler population. The white minority numbers less than 280,000 in a population of over 6 million, but it is a minority determined to maintain its power and privilege as long as possible. History, for the white minority, begins with the aggressive expansionism of Cecil Rhodes. His central role in the work of British colonial occupation at the end of the 19th century is reflected in the naming of both Northern Rhodesia (now independent Zambia) and Southern Rhodesia in his honor. The attitude of most white settlers toward African history prior to white occupation is accurately summed up by the white Rhodesian who told a New York Times reporter: "The African has no past, very little present without white or yellow help, and no future of his own." Rhodesian settlers use this argument to justify the history of white minority rule, to explain the present repression of Africans and to project continued white rule into the future.
    [Show full text]