DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter Five

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter Five CHAPTER FIVE BLEEDING HEARTS AND KILLING DARTS IN ABDELAZER, OR THE MOOR’S REVENGE Rather, how hast thou yeelded to transgress That strict forbiddance, how to violate The sacred Fruit forbidd’n! som cursed fraud Of Enemie hath beguil’d thee, yet unknown ....1 In his History of England, Laurence Echard claims that Charles II’s reign from 1674 onward was mostly taken up by internal disputes and various domestic disturbances.2 As noted in the previous chapter, the King’s Declaration of Indulgence (1672) and Parliament’s Test Act (1673) had contributed in no way toward the stabilization of the government. The marriage of James, Duke of York, to the Roman Catholic Mary of Modena in 1673 simply added fuel to an already raging fire. Parliament, unhappy about James’ choice – for surely there was a Protestant bride to be found – wanted to discuss the matter prior to the new duchess’s arrival and the consummation of the marriage. By 1674, the King was forced to issue a proclamation To Restrain the Spreading of False News, and Licentious Talking of Matter of State and Government, which “showed clearly the King’s fears of upheaval”.3 The situation was so clamorous that Richard Legh wrote to his brother Thomas at Lyme, observing, “God deliver us from the fate of 1641. These days look too like them.”4 As if the current fracas both over and within the government was insufficient, in August 1 Milton, Paradise Lost, IX, 902-905, ed. Elledge, 221. 2 Laurence Echard, The History of England: From the First Entrance of Julius Caesar King William and Queen Mary, 3 vols, London, 1707-1718, III, 356. 3 Miller, Charles II, 235. See A Proclamation: To Restrain the Spreading of False News, and Licentious Talking of Matters of State and Government, 2 May 1674, included here in Appendix B. 4 Lady Newton, Lyme Letters 1660-1760, London: Heinemann, 1925, 55. 160 Of Love and War 1675, the weavers rioted in London for several days. The King had reason to be alarmed, for as Sarotti notes: “Many of the citizens here, remembering the beginning and the manner of the late revolution, are apprehensive that more of the populace, stirred up by evil men, may also raise other kinds of pretensions or demands under colour of the public good … .”5 In October 1675, Ralph Josselin records in his diary the country’s fears of “the poor rising up and down our country, especially those that belong to the wool trade”.6 Certainly to the observer, the 1670s must have seemed rife with sedition and the seeds – and fears – of rebellion, as this decade raced toward the Popish Plot and the Exclusion Crisis. Already fomenting, however, before Titus Oates spins his wild story, are deep concerns about religion and the succession, issues Behn attempts to treat in Abdelazer, or The Moor’s Revenge.7 The choice of this play, given the political acuity Behn has demonstrated to date, is one that could hardly have been accidental. The play is revision of Lust’s Dominion; or The Lascivious Queen (1657), at one time ascribed to Marlowe, but more recently to Day, Haughton, and/or Dekker.8 Charles Cathcart argues that Lust’s Dominion was published in 1657 for political reasons and suggests that the Moor in this play, Eleazar, might be viewed as Oliver Cromwell. Cathcart bases his claim on one surviving copy of the play that suggests through its commendatory versus that the current regime has an “inverted sense 5 A rather lengthy discussion of the incident may be found in Calendar of State Papers Venetian 1673-1675, in Paolo Sarotti’s letters to the Doge and Senate, 23 August 1675, 446-51. See also Correspondence of the Family of Hatton, being Chiefly Letters Addressed to Christopher, First Viscount Hatton, A.D. 1601-1704, ed. Edward Maunde Thompson, Camden Society n.s. 22-23, New York: Johnson Reprint, 1965, I, 120. In January 1676, there were further problems with the weavers and in March, they met several times to determine what could be done “to encourage the English weavers and put down the French”. In the end, the mercers were invited to “wait upon the King ... with patterns of stuffs and silks, when he will make his choice, and he and all the Court will constantly wear these to the exclusion of all other” (HMC Le Fleming, 124-25). 6 Ralph Josselin, Diary of Ralph Josselin 1616-1683, ed. Alan MacFarlane, Records of Social and Economic History, New Series, London: Oxford UP, 1976, 587. 7 Aphra Behn, Abdelazer, or the Moor’s Revenge, in Works, V, 139-315. 8 Lust’s Dominion; or, The Lascivious Queen, in Materials for the Study of English Drama, ed. J. Le Gay Brereton, Louvain: Uystpruyst, 1931, V, 1-146. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Good King Charles Study Guide New.Pub
    In Good King Charles’s Golden Days By Bernard Shaw ONNECTIONS Shaw Festival CStudy Guide The Shaw Story 2 The Players 3 The Story 4 The Playwright 5 Who’s Who 6-7 Director’s Notes 8 Designer’s Notes 9-10 Production History 11 World of the Play 12-16 Did You Know? 17 Say What? 18 Sources 19 Activities 20-32 THE SHAW STORY MANDATE The Shaw Festival is the only theatre in the world which exclusively focuses on plays by Bernard Shaw and his contemporaries, including plays written during, or about the period of Shaw’s lifetime (1856 – 1950). The Shaw Festival’s mandate also includes: • Uncovered Gems – digging up undiscovered theatrical treasures, or plays which were considered major works when they were written but which have since been unjustly neglected • American Classics – we continue to celebrate the best of American theatre • Musicals – musical treats either from, or set during the period of our mandate • Canadian Work – to allow us to hear and promote our own stories, and our own WHAT MAKES points of view about the mandate period. SHAW SPECIAL MEET THE COMPANY — OUR ENSEMBLE • Our Actors: All Shaw performers contribute to the sense of ensemble, much like the players in an orchestra. Often, smaller parts are played by actors who are leading performers in their own right, but in our “orchestra,” they support the central action helping to create a density of experiences that are both subtle and informative. • Our Designers: Every production that graces the Shaw Festival stages is built “from scratch,” from an original design.
    [Show full text]
  • Arcadia Disjointed: Confrontations with Texts, Polemical, Utopian, and Picaresque
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1991 Arcadia Disjointed: Confrontations With Texts, Polemical, Utopian, and Picaresque. Deborah Ann Jacobs Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Jacobs, Deborah Ann, "Arcadia Disjointed: Confrontations With Texts, Polemical, Utopian, and Picaresque." (1991). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 5126. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/5126 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jesuits and the Popish Plot
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1950 The Jesuits and the Popish Plot Robert Joseph Murphy Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Murphy, Robert Joseph, "The Jesuits and the Popish Plot" (1950). Master's Theses. 1177. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/1177 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1950 Robert Joseph Murphy THE JESUITS AND THE POPISH PLOT BY ROBERT J. MURPHY. S.d. A THESIS SUBMITTED II PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE or MAStER OF ARTS IN LOYOLA UNIVERSITY JULY 1950 VI't A AUCTORIS Robert Joseph Murphy was born in Chicago, Illinois, April 15. 1923. He received his elementary education at St. Mel School. Ohicago, Ill.,. graduating in June, 1937 • Ho attended St. Mel High School tor one year and St. Ignatius High School. Chicago, Ill., grQduat1ng in June. 1941. In August, 1941, he entered the Jesuit Novitiate of the Sacred Heart, Millord, Ohio, remaining there until August 1945. 'that same month he entered West Baden College, West Baden Springs, Indiana, and transtered his studies in the Department of History to Loyola University, Ohicago, Ill. He received hi. Bachelor ot Arts degree in June, 1946, and began his graduate studies at Loyola in September 1946.
    [Show full text]
  • 170 Seventeenth-Century News
    170 seventeenth-century news with the Johannine Spirit,” they discover imaginative resources suf- ficient to “elevate them above the theological quibbles and ideological wrangling of the time” (36). Perhaps, though, the monograph’s ambi- tion to embrace fully both literature and theology invites reflection on the methodology of such interdisciplinary inquiry. Apart from the sixth, each chapter proceeds from an examination of exegetical tradition—amply documented in early modern sermons, tractates, and glossation as well as in modern Biblical scholarship—to close readings of selected literary texts. Implicit in this sort of structure is the danger of presenting intellectual history as a static, stable backdrop for the corybantic performances of literary imagination. While the chapters are more than subtle enough to escape this trap (in no small part because Cefalu brings the same nimble close reading practices to theological as to literary texts), at times the method produces the effect of two entangled discourses, or perhaps two distinct discursive stems nourished by a common taproot of learning. But perhaps this structure is merely the true reflected image of a Johannine Renais- sance that appears to be deep but diffuse, less a cohesive movement than a surprising concatenation of affinities across a wide spectrum of religious opinion. Gary Schneider. Print Letters in Seventeenth-Century England: Politics, Religion, and News Culture. New York: Routledge, 2018. x + 284 pp. $140.00. Review by Nicole Greenspan, Hampden-Sydney College. In Print Letters in Seventeenth-Century England, Gary Schneider examines the intersection of epistolarity, ideology, propaganda, and news culture. The chronological focus is the 1640s and 1650s, which saw a rise in the numbers of printed letters and their regular deploy- ment in political and religious contestations, though Schneider gives due attention to the earlier and later parts of the century as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Leoline Jenkins Newsletters
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8gq7391 No online items Leoline Jenkins newsletters Finding aid prepared by Gayle M. Richardson The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens Manuscripts Department The Huntington Library 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2191 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org © 2016 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Leoline Jenkins newsletters mssJEN 1-202 1 Descriptive Summary Title: Leoline Jenkins newsletters Dates: 1676-1680 Collection Number: mssJEN 1-202 Creator OR Collector: Jenkins, Leoline, Sir, 1623-1685 Extent: 202 items Repository: The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens. Manuscripts Department 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2191 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org Abstract: A collection of letters, newsletters and reports of Parliamentary Proceedings sent to the diplomat Sir Leoline Jenkins and his secretary Dr. Owen Wynne, 1676-1680. Language of Material: The records are in English and French. Access Collection is open to qualified researchers by prior application through the Reader Services Department. For more information, please go to following web site . Publication Rights The Huntington Library does not require that researchers request permission to quote from or publish images of this material, nor does it charge fees for such activities. The responsibility for identifying the copyright holder, if there is one, and obtaining necessary permissions rests with the researcher. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Leoline Jenkins newsletters, The Huntington Library, San Marino, California. Acquisition Information Purchased through Maggs Brothers, from Sotheby’s, Lot 2959, June 26, 1974.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Ralph Stewart IRSS 33 (2008) 37 Gilbert Burnet’s Politics Ralph Stewart * In July, 1663, Archibald Johnston of Wariston was hanged at the market cross of Edinburgh, officially for the ‘high treason’ of accepting office in Cromwell’s government. Although many people in Scotland had held similar positions, and assisted Cromwell in other ways, only three were executed. (The others were the Earl of Argyle, and Wariston’s friend James Guthrie, a minister.) Wariston’s real crime was to have spearheaded the Scottish revolt against Charles I in the late 1630s, which began with bitter opposition to Charles’ plans to make the Presbyterian Scottish church more like the English one, and more amenable to his wishes. Wariston was co-composer of the Scottish Covenant which challenged the King’s authority, and Clerk of the unofficial parliamentary committee (made up of noblemen, lairds, merchants and ministers) which had subscribed the Covenant. When the King’s decrees on the Kirk were read out by a herald at Edinburgh’s market cross, in the traditional manner, supporters of the Covenant would oblige the herald to stay while Wariston read out a ‘Protestation’ asking for remedy of grievances and a ‘free [Kirk] Assembly and Parliament’.1 In insisting on the execu- tion and quartering of this arch-Covenanter (his head was stuck on the Netherbow Port, beside James Guthrie’s) Charles II may have been motivated partly by personal resentment - though Wariston had no significant part in Charles I’s death - but was also eliminating a symbol of resistance to the King’s authority.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title “Poetick Rage” to Rage of Party: English Political Verse, 1678-1685 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/67k814zg Author McLaughlin, Leanna Publication Date 2018 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE “Poetick Rage” to Rage of Party: English Political Verse, 1678-1685 A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by Leanna Hope McLaughlin December 2018 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Thomas Cogswell, Chairperson Dr. Randolph Head Dr. Patricia Fumerton Copyright by Leanna Hope McLaughlin 2018 The Dissertation of Leanna Hope McLaughlin is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS While saving the best for last may seem like a great idea, the acknowledgements are actually some of the harder words I have ever written. How does one put into words the boundless gratitude to the people and organizations that have made this book possible? Still, I must try. This dissertation simply would not have been possible without the patience, encouragement, and guidance of Dr. Thomas Cogswell. In addition to pointing me in the direction of the most delightful and scandalous sources in early modern England, Tom’s help and advice helped me craft the larger argument and his laughter at the content fueled my drive. Thanks to Tom I will eternally move “onward and upward.” I owe Dr. Randolph Head a great deal for his unending support, his uncanny ability to help me see the narrative flow and the bigger picture, and his dogmatic attention to questions of historical practice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nichols Collection, 1666–1737: Religion, Regulation and the Development of the Metropolitan Press
    The Nichols Collection, 1666–1737: Religion, Regulation and the Development of the Metropolitan Press Daniel Reed, Oxford Brookes University The Nichols collection of seventeenth and eighteenth-century Glorious Revolution of 1688 and the lapse of the Licensing Act in newspapers (1666–1737) encompasses a period about which 1695. These staging points were crucial to the transformation of there remains a lively debate among historians as to the newspaper enterprises in Britain from a small, state-controlled religious temperature of British society. Recent scholarship has monopoly to a diverse, nationwide marketplace in which millions variously depicted the turn of the eighteenth century as the of copies were sold annually.2 dawn of an ‘age of infidelity’, or at the crux of a religious revival wherein the Church of England was central to the foundation of new benevolent institutions and societies in England and Wales.1 What is certain is that political and religious life in Britain was deeply interconnected throughout this period, and the development of the news trade was determined by attempts to regulate printed material that might threaten religious, political and social order. Using the contents of the Nichols collection as a guide, this essay identifies key moments in the development 1 of the metropolitan press, and provides an introduction to Penelope J. Corfield, ‘An Age of Infidelity: Secularization in eighteenth century England’, in Social History, 39:2 (2014), pp. 229–247; Brent S. Sirota, the politico-religious background of three episodes of central The Christian Monitors: The Church of England and the Age of Benevolence, 1680–1730 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • The Strange Death of Edmund Godfrey: Plots and Politics in Restoration London'
    H-Albion Harris on Marshall, 'The Strange Death of Edmund Godfrey: Plots and Politics in Restoration London' Review published on Thursday, June 1, 2000 Alan Marshall. The Strange Death of Edmund Godfrey: Plots and Politics in Restoration London. Stroud, Gloucestershire: Sutton Publishing, 1999. xiv + 241 pp. $ 34.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-7509-2100-8. Reviewed by Tim Harris (Department of History, Brown University) Published on H-Albion (June, 2000) This is a splendid little book. It is a historical who-dunnit, and while it is unlikely to provoke a fundamental revision of Restoration historiography (this is hardly its intent), it makes for a fascinating read. Edmund Godfrey was a Westminster Justice of the Peace who was found dead in a ditch near Primrose Hill on the evening of 17 October 1678, after having been missing for several days. He was lying face down with his own sword run through him just under his left breast, but he had not been robbed, and the pose suggested he might have committed suicide by falling on his own weapon. The inquest, however, revealed that Godfrey had died several days earlier by strangulation, that he was already dead when the sword had passed through him, and that he might even have been beaten prior to death. What turned Godfrey's mysterious death into a cause celebre was the fact that he had recently taken a series of depositions from Titus Oates concerning a deeply laid Catholic conspiracy against the king's life. The death was therefore immediately attributed to Catholics, as an attempt to cover up what is known to history as the Popish Plot, and three men -- Robert Green, Henry Berry, and Lawrence Hill -- were to die on the scaffold for having allegedly murdered the Protestant magistrate.
    [Show full text]
  • Mistress of Fortune Is Based Upon These Events and Their Aftermath
    Historical Note On 12 October 1678, a popular London magistrate named Sir Edmund Berry Godfrey left his home in Westminster and never returned. Five days later, two local tradesmen found his slain body in a drainage ditch at the base of Primrose Hill, a London suburb. To this day the murder remains unsolved. Mistress of Fortune is based upon these events and their aftermath. 2 Chapter One Wednesday, 9 October 1678 I was born with a head full of fiery red curls, which caused my mother to weep the first time she saw me. It was a bad omen, she said; ginger-colored hair was the mark of a sorceress. It was just a quaint superstition, so the question that prompted the memory of my long-dead mother might have amused me had it not been asked by Sir Edmund Godfrey, justice of the peace of Westminster. “Are you a witch, Mistress Ruby?” He shifted his eyes about my shadowy, sparsely furnished room and widened them as he explored the contents of the bookcase behind my desk. Crowded with books, it also housed bottles of alchemical liquids, a human skull, and several other curiosities, displayed for the sole purpose of exploiting my customers’ unease. Now, however, it was I who struggled to keep my nerves steady. If such creatures as witches existed, I was not one of them. My expertise as a soothsayer consisted mostly of keen intuition and skillful manipulation rather than actual divination. While it was a dubious distinction and a questionable means of earning a living, it was not illegal.
    [Show full text]
  • Litany of the Saints and Martyrs of England and Wales
    Catholic Martyrs 1534 - 1680 Lancashire 71 St John Almond, Liverpool 1612 Yorkshire 72 St Edmund Arrowsmith, Haydock 1628 Litany of the Saints and Martyrs 73 St Ambrose Edward Barlow, Chorlton-cum- Hardy 1641 174 St Margaret Clitherow, York 1586 203 Bl Brian Lacey 1591 74 St John Plessington, Garstang 1679 175 St John Fisher, Beverley 1535 204 Bl William Lacy, Horton 1582 75 St John Rigby, Eccleston, nr Chorley 1600 176 Bl Henry Abbot, Howden 1597 205 Bl Joseph Lambton, Malton-in- Rydal 1592 76 St John Southworth, Samlesbury 1654 177 Bl John Amias, Wakefield 1589 206 Bl Richard Langley, Ousethorpe 1586 77 St John Wall, Preston 1679 178 Bl William Andleby, Etton 1597 207 Bl John Lockwood, Sowerby 1642 78 Bl Edward Bamber, Poulton-le-Fylde 1646 179 Bl Thomas Atkinson, Willitoft 1616 208 Bl Anthony Middleton, Middleton-Tyas 1590 79 Bl William Barrow, Kirkham 1679 180 Bl Robert Bickerdike, Knaresborough 1586 209 Bl Robert Morton, Bawtry 1588 of England and Wales 80 Bl George Beesley, Goosnargh 1591 Scotland 181 Bl Marmaduke Bowes, Appleton Wiske 1585 210 Bl John Nelson, Skelton 1577 81 Bl James Bell, Warrington 1584 182 Bl John Bretton, Barnsley 1598 211 Bl Thomas Palasor, Ellerton-on-Swale 1600 82 Bl Edmund Catherick 1642 183 Bl James Claxton 1588 212 Bl John Pibush, Thirsk 1601 213 Bl Thoms Pormort, Hull 1592 83 Bl Thomas Cottam, Longridge 1582 184 Bl Alexander Crow, Howden 1587 214 Bl Nicholas Postgate, Egton 1679 84 Bl John Finch, Eccleston 1584 185 Bl Robert Dalby, Hemingbrough 1589 255 215 Bl William Richardson, Wales 1603 85 Bl Miles
    [Show full text]
  • James II and the Catholic Succession
    James II and the Catholic Succession Dr Joseph Hone in conversation with Dr John West www.stuarts-online.com Joseph Hone: So I’m in the Fellows’ Library at Jesus College, Oxford, with Dr John West. And we are looking at a set of Charles II's papers which were made public after his death. And these have interesting parallels with leaked papers from today in the private correspondence or emails of senior government ministers or indeed Prince Charles’s private lobbying correspondence, which reveals some of the ways in which the next in line to the throne thinks behind closed doors. But John, to go back to the seventeenth century, these papers in front of us purport to be the personal papers written by Charles II on the eve of his death in February 1685. What do these papers tell us about Charles and why are they so important? John West: Well the papers, as you say, they purport to be Charles’s personal papers, specifically they are his spiritual deliberations, in the days and weeks leading up to his death at the beginning of February 1685. The important thing about them is that they reveal Charles's conversion from Protestantism to Catholicism. Charles describes in these papers that ‘none can be that church but that which is called the Roman Catholic Church’, and then they are printed, shortly after he dies. JH: So we have a dead monarch whose faith is open to the public scrutiny. JW: Yeah. JH: Has that ever happened before? JW: Yes it has.
    [Show full text]