DOCSLIB.ORG

Hiawatha NF TAP East Zone Draft Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hiawatha NF TAP East Zone Draft Review S 3 3 1 I 0 3 3 3 3 I 3 4 3 3 0 2 S114F 0 0 3 4 9 4 5 3003 S RD 2 ET 7 TE 1 3 2 3 5 3 3 1 7 3 1 1 7 S 0 5 1 3 2 S 9 5 B 1 4 2 3 B 1 S 1 1 7 7 1 9 3 2 S 9 3 22 23 24 19 4 3 D S 3 5 21 2 20 H 20 3 3 19 3 2 1 9 1 A 24 3 3 3 23 A 2 21 3 8 8 3 FH- 2 19 3 22 5 C k 24 3 9 3 e 3 2 e 5 23 1 7 2 1 r 4 C B 2 0 2 3 3 2 r 4 4 20 3 7 4 a 1 S e 0 0 0 4 2 22 4 B 1 0 8 1 3 2 21 A 3 S A 6 3 9 3 0 0 19 5 3 5 3 3 1 6 3 3 3 1 3 51 A 1 S 1 E 27 1 1 1 3 3 5 5 1 D 25 Trout Lake S 1 3 S 26 6 3 30 29 28 3 27 5 3119I 25 2 26 S 1 3 Frenchman Lake 3 28 S134F1 6 0 1 3 9 S 0 30 4 B F 4 4 2 8 3 E 3 4 25 1 2 26 1 S 3 2 D 2 27 D 5 3 2 29 29 R 30 3 2 3 3 25 3 7 5 T.44N., R.4W., 19 1 Y Schwe 26 28 1 si B nger Cree 27 3 G k B 28 3 3 S 7 2 2 S 1 S 1 29 1 H U 4 30 T.44N., R.5W., 19 7 3 2 3 1 7 3 1 Wegwaas Lake 2 2 R 2 H 1 1 2 3 7 2 S 3 3 A 4 J 1 E S 2 G 5 3 3119L k 3 I T.44N., R.3W., 19 H F 1 e S135E 1 S S C e 1 1 3 r 1 3 13 1 C 5 T.44N., R.6W., 19 3242 3 3 S 5 5 D r S 1 3 35 A 1 3 3237 k a A 1 e B C 31 7 e Mud Lake 5 2 e B h 7 Schlehubers Marsh 2 1 3 u r r 2 3 C C 12 9 F B 3A 3 le 1 36 b e S 1 5 S 2 t A v C 5 t 3511B5 35 C 1 i 3 i 1 S 7 34 t 3 1 L 3 re 5 i R 3 1 1 D C 5 e 3 32 Johnson Lake u 33 k 5 3 S A 3 2 3511 A 31 2 g c 2 36 3 B 1 4 35 1 4 n s 3 3 3 34 C i A 2 o 7 33 B 32 c A 3 31 E 36 3 s 35 u 34 3 F r e n Huckleberry Lake 32 1 1 iv 37 36 31 S H 1 R 86 u 35 33 Boaz Lake 3 3 5 ne 34 3 2 3 3 i M 33 23 3 5 P I0 32 3 1 1B 31 1 3 3 3 G C 3 E G 1 4 C 9 1 0 3 1 2 2 1 1 I0 5 2 5 3 3 1 3 5 I11 3 3 F 3 6A TY LINE 3341 378 2 1 COUN C 31 23 A 4 1 3 3 3 I 5 5 C 2 2 6 A 1 8 2 3 G I O 1 1 25 0 2 A 1 3 3 5 3 3323 3 I 3 1 3 1 8 I01D 3 1 4 H R 3 9G 1 1 3 1 4 A C 6 3113 317 ia 2 3 R w D 3759 3 3 1 1 at A h 8 3 E 4 3 a 2 1 1 R 23F 6 5 u 3 4 n 2 1 5B 0 4 3 11 1 3 6 5 3325 2 3 34 97 H 9 A I 3 06 11 1 1 I B 1 C A 1 0A CO RD 535 A 0 3 3 12 1 3788 1 1 J I 11 3 1D J A 4 1 1 61 I 4 13 I J 1 9 31 10 I 0 11 3 3 7 3 E 1 8 9 0 3 A 2 1 3 CO RD 6 3 19 1 12 7 7 A 2 3 33 1 8 7 11 3 A 1 9 3 10 349 1 6 I14F C I 7B I1 12 9 3 0 k 4 A 8 1 I A 1 3385 3 4 7 e 3 4 3 3 e 5 A A 9 11 2 34 r 10 1 I 16 0 I15A B 8 3758 I 3 3113I 1 B 11B 8 11 A C 3 4 8 3 378 4 8A 8 F 3 1 7 12 k 311 I 4E I 5 11 I B 3 3 1 r 9 7 10 9 7 A A 5 a 8 0 E A 3 z 3 A Hill Lake I 8 3 7 C 4 8 3 80 8 3 5 5 1 A 4 O 3 8 I 3 3 7 I I B 35 3 9 G D 3 3 3 A 3 5 9 C 27E 1 3 3 B 4 C 2 8 13 0 3 A 1 9 1 9 3 I P 5 3 I 1 2 2 2 B 0 D 3 3 4 I35B 2 3 B I Koski Pond 3 3 9 3 7 1 9 k 1 0 ree 3 8 C 3 r D A 5 ilve 2 S 13 8 3 91 East Lake I 14 3 2 Guard Lake 33 B 3 15 4 C 0 3 37 3 4 16 3 3 4 1 1 7 2 B 8 1 13 18 9 C 3 4 1 14 3 C 9 C 3 k 32 2 e 30 3A A 15 E 33 9 3 e 13 327 31 16 lm r A B D 17 13 I3 9A H B hi I3 2 I C I r 1 3 3 8 3 13 5 3 7 3 14 3 st A 3774 d A 18 8 A 3 5 15 2 1 I 17 8 C u 37 16 33 5 17 1 r A C 5 e M I 8 ek 14 C 3 16 8 17 18 3 T.43N., R.2W., 19 18 I38D 33 4 1 Ro 3330D 15 29 8 7 ck E 3 7 T.43N., R.4W., 19 H Sp 7 B E om rin Grass Lake 4 5 e 3 g A T.43N., R.3W., 19 C 8 C 8 D 5C I5 re 0 re A 5 e 0 e 5 I k A A F k 9 5 5 8 3 14 7A 3 3 I 2 20 3 2 I4 I2 3 1 1 7 4 5 3 4 A 1 I C 3 A 8 7 3 I 1 8 4 3 57 1 7 0 3 A 4 3 1 B 24 7 8 I 3 3 I 3 5 2 3 3 327 1 M 5 I 23 B 3 C 8 3 7 1 32 2 3 0 T.43N., R.5W., 19 3 7 33 5 B 22 00 1 3 5 3 B 3 B 1 1 21 0 4 113N 24 380 3 6 Cedar Lake C C D I Round Lake 6 3 23 A 4 I I 7 1 B 6 3 22 5 6 8 19 1 6 37 B 7 21 1 A 46 4 C 3 6 I 4 1 1 3 6 19 20 C I 1 J 6 B 2 7 24 5 S 2 31 1 r 3 4 I 8 o 6 D K 5 o 15 3 1 7 u 1 o t I4 A 21 7 6 37 6 4 A A k h 3 I 4 7 3 380 4 3 I5 4 5 6A 9A e B 5 I 19 4 1 0A A 3809 d ra 24 47 20 7 11 7 0 822 3 7 23 B 3 C 3 A n 333 22 5 I 3 B 3 7 c 0 L r 3 21 A 4 23 A I5 e 8 h 20 3 2 6 7 7D 3 6 e C 3 I 7 22 5 5 19 30 E 4 1 D 4 3 CO RD 333 34 k I a I 1 3 2 B 5 3 3111C 7 5 5 6 r 6 3 1 G 4 A I p I 3 0 1 1 5 4 3 R D I A 7 C 3 3 C 4 0 i 7 I 3 O 8 v 2 I4 4 8 e 5 6 3 9 2 C 1 1 B r 3 B 7 7 C 1 B 4 1 1 3 E 0 3 37 0 8 5 1 3 9 A 3425A A 6 3 6 3 F 2 3122 3 1 3 I I 25 42 8 I 4 1 3 I 0 8 1 30 D I42C 8 3 1 B 3 26 2 1 A 6 4 A 7 6 27 I 3 0 2 3 1 I8 - 28 7 C I 7 6 29 4 C M I 26 4 I 1 3 6H D C 75 5 311 7 H 5 25 3 6 2 1 7 I8 I F 2 1 6 E 5 4 4 3489AA I C B C 9 3 0 3 1 28 27 3 6 3 2 3 29 I7 3 25 1 I64B A 3 3 1 1 7 3 3 1 3 4 B 8 26 6 0 3 2A A 1B G B 30 8 I 1 27 3 9 9 31 2 2 5 5 6 P 7 3 7 37 28 5 3 A 3 29 1 16 A 3 3 1 31 8 3 I 3 25 3 B A 3 3332 28 26 7 30 1 S I 5 1 3 1 29 8 11 27 3 1 3 1 3 3 3 8 6 2 A F 9 T 30 3 8 0E 4 4 I10 A 1 6 A D 1 1 87 3 6 I 3 G C 6 B A 1 13 9 1 8 1 3 5 9 3771A 5 T 3 7 a 1 7 I y 3 l 1 or 3 A C 3 7 I 9 re 7 0 1 e 1 8 I k 0 1 3 7 8 I 0 4 3 1 7 A 7 3 36 5 8 D I 5 3 7 0 A 1 B 0 3 3 35 8 7 0 8 3 3 34 7 4 5 3 3 31 33 7 I 1 C A 7 0 3 2 3 B 3 32 7 3 2 3 9E 76 34 5 B 0 6 2 A 9 9 3 D 8 A A 36 5 B J C 8 I1 5 4 i 0 I 35 5 3 ss B 34 6 C 0 D 7 el 72 I8 9 32 33 0 6B C I I8 B R 3 I7 r 31 ee 36 3 I89A 0A 0 O k 35 7 I1 3 3 3 3 C 82C 33 9 0 3 9 33 32 9 E 31 2 F 0 9 36 1 32 9 35 0 9 34 S 3 33 p A 3 6 r 3 ing 425 3 4 C 3 31 L A 3763 C a A 5 3 5 3 k 4 9 e D 0 I 3 7 3 C C 0 B 8 4 - 4 3 r 9 9 e I I 4 t River 6 9 9 u I C e I 2 k 0 2 8 7 1 Spring Lake 8 3 0 G 5 A 9 0 9 0 3 5 3 9 0 2 3 7 H 3 0 2 2 3 C 5 A 9 8 B A 3 9 3425B 3 4 0 30 D 6 4 3 3 3 1 A A 3 3 5 1 A 0 3 3 Q H 1 5 3 0 N 3 R 1 I 1 2 1 7 I 3 7 N o 31 4 I 8 1 3 9 3 2 2 r 3 2 4 7 9 37 th 0 I102 u C 4 I 9 H O 6 3468 9 I 8 2 I 7 B B 1 n 1 r 3 3 7 1 3 I 3 A 0 a A 0 1 C 4 n C n 2 0 8 c 5 3 s 4 h A 1 1 E 7 25 9 3373 C A 34 1 C 3 I B a I 2 9 4 3 r I 0 p 3 5 r I94B 2 4 5 4 1 R 4 4 3 e i 3 C I A 7 1 v 5 e 1 0 1 e 4 A I 0 r 6 k 7 A A B I98B 5 D 1 D 8 9 6 7 9 I 2 7 7 1 I 7 5 4 3 5 I 0 3 5 9 4 4 1 6 B 449 I 3 1 3 -84 8 2 I FH 6 4 9A I 2 1 4 1 8 3476 478 5 3479 3 3 34 0 1 3 4 Mackinac Wilderness 2 I A 3124EF 2 C B 6 ar M-134 C E p 3 O 3 8 4 4 A R 6 I 8 3 6 5 1 2 i 4 v I 10 1 R 3 1 7 9 4 e Platz Lake 2 1 2 0 J r 3 3 2 3 8 7 3 D 7 3 3 3 A 3 3 1 3 4 7 2 9 3 7 A 3 7 8 1 7 3 3 2 9 A 2 8 2 1 1 A C 4 32 2 12 3 3 u 3381 I 3 3 2 1 83 3 11 t 24 30 33 3 C 10 R 8 11 7 i C 7 O 9 v A 7 3 8 e R r 9 7 6 3 D 3760 33 3 K 8 91 7 4 1 2 3 C 6 9 4 2 8 3 2 3 4 9 I 0 A 1 1 0 I I 2 2 12 0 126C 1 1 0 3 11 3 A 2 3 4 1 3 12 B 10 7 08 6 1 6 3 9 C 8 A A 7 T.42N., R.2W., 19 7 3 24G 4 12 1 9 3 9 10 11 8 7 I 3 1 900 30 7 3 3 D 39 5B 812 7 3 13 3 4 44 14 3 3 6 ek 3308 7 I1 e 2 r 9 t C 31 Fla 3 3 5 B 8 795 A 1 8 16 Beaver Pond 34 T.42N., R.3W., 19 I 13 37 45 17 13 14 141A 85 3795B 15 0C 3 I 18 124 I12 16 F 2A C 3 3 2 1 A 18 A 3386 7 8 18 3 3 0 14 13 9 I1 1 15 2 I 7 C 16 1 7 3 3455 17 I 31117A 17 3 18 31 I1 14 13 D 15 C I1 3 3 17 16 3 8 39A 21 4 1 8 1 4 5 I 5 7 1 1 1 18 0 3 A I 3 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 4 3 19 8 B 0 4 3 3 B 3147B 20 0 3 A 0 A B 4 7 4 5 37 3 I13 3 3 5 5 4 B 4 I1 3 4 I1 C 3 40 43 1 A 3 A 3 I T.42N., R.5W., 19 0 T.42N., R.4W., 19 I B 4 345 1 2 24 1 C I 4 4 A 3 7 3 22 3 7 0 23 3 7 2 3 3 3 7 I 3 5 B 4 3 3 B 1 1 5 3 7 1 4 7 5 2 C 0 7 7 3 3 3 0 2 3 3 4 7 2 3 I CO RD 520 4 2 12 2 7 7 1 4 20 1 A 4 C A C 3 3 3 3 8 3 8 4 6 3 7 B 2 4 3 0 8 8 2 21 4 4 5 3 3 3108A 3 3 0 4 B 5 0 3 3 4 0 4 3 3 3304 53 24 7 19 3 3 3 3 05 23 4 0 A 1 9 3 I1 19 22 3 21 3 34 46 20 I 3 3108B 45757D B D 22 24 Red C 15 E 4 23 3 A 53A reek 6 B I 0 I1 C 5 6 1 21 3 2 A 3 A B 3 B 5C 0 3 4 20 5 9 I13 I1 6 5 35 3 19 34 1 I 4 5 L 5 3 1 A 7 1 5 3 3 B D 1 60 4 A 19 I 39 36 3 k 3 A 1 3 Paquin Lake 3118F 1 I 08C e 4 4 R 27 31 5 5 e 1 A 5 B D r I I 9 3 Little Brevoort Lake O 2 1 1 7 7 8 C 5 5 A 64 F 5 C 31 0 1 r D 1 9C 3 e 4 I 1 6 B 8D v 3 3 0 l 4 25 1 i 3457A 37 M 3 E S 1 49 I 26 8 2 310 - 3 3 1 3 4 0 3 0 2 3 4 6 3 3 A A 0 8 3 6 A 4 3 4 3 2 7 3 4 3 D 5 5 3 3 8 C 1 3 1 7 0 I 6 R 28 3 8 4 3 O 3 4 8 29 6 25 3 3E4 3 3 3 36D 3 30 4 O 73 R 34 28 9 5L B73 C 26 3 A D 1 BB 27 2 I BA 03 3 38 29 C 3 7 25 2 H 6 4 26 2 10 3 27 5 3 36 8 28 4 3 4 F 29 I1 3 3 3AA 30 344773 C 30 A 1 K 6 32 RD 34 5 8 CO 6 I 3 310 2 CO RD 424 3 G 6 1 8G 1 B 5 I 5 3 3 A I 35 3 6 1 7 3 9 I 43 D 7 1 6 3 1 34 0 3 6 3 1 I I1 4 66B R 0A 0 1 3 I16 9 3 3 9 E 6 1 3 7 3 0 O A 0 33 3 8 3 2 C H 4 Brevoort Lake 3 D 3 37 iver R 6 82 r le Cut R 32 G e Litt 31 O iv C R 34 35 36 25 32 B rt 31 CO RD 4 o 36 33 0 0 o 7 v 3 9 31 e 1 9 35 4 r 0 3 National Forest Begins Road Study 33 B 34 Satago Lake 1 4 7 32 D A 3 3 5 R 7A 7 1 6 O I1 I M C -57 EACSTO RD H-57 EAST a CO RD H r 3 t 1 i 09 n A3 e 1 3 A a T.41N., R.2W., 19 0 4 03 u 3 9 2 3 1 4 3 C 2 B r 5 9 C e 0 7 e 37 1 O 09 3 6 5 k 4 A - R 6 H D 2 D 3 Horseshoe Bay Wilderness 4 3 4 R 6 5 6 2 1 9 T.41N., R.3W., 19 2 O 4 2 3 10 A C 11 3 65 5 I1 3 7 6 6 3175 3962 8 3303 S 7 8 u m m e 12 rb 11 A 9 9 10 y 6 7 8 C 7 12 r I1 11 107 ee 3 k 3 Round Lake 10 1 0 5 E B 1 E 7 Sprinkler Lake Lake Superior 1 3 18 I 1 4 F A 3 1 D 2 16 3 7 2 7 7 A 7 1 I11 I I1 I 7 7 2 Marquette 6 16 Sault Ste.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2011 Annual Beach Monitoring Report
    MI/DEQ/WRD-12/034 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER RESOURCES DIVISION AUGUST 2012 STAFF REPORT MICHIGAN BEACH MONITORING YEAR 2011 ANNUAL REPORT INTRODUCTION The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program, is summarized in the January 1997 report entitled, “A Strategic Environmental Quality Monitoring Program for Michigan’s Surface Waters” (Strategy) (MDEQ, 1997). The objectives of the beach monitoring component of the Strategy are listed below: 1. Assist local health departments to implement and strengthen beach monitoring programs. 2. Create and maintain a statewide database. 3. Determine whether waters of the state are safe for total body contact recreation. 4. Compile data to determine overall water quality. 5. Evaluate the effectiveness of MDEQ programs in attaining Water Quality Standards (WQS) for pathogen indicators. 1. ASSIST LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS TO IMPLEMENT AND STRENGTHEN BEACH MONITORING PROGRAMS Beach Monitoring The monitoring of beaches in Michigan is voluntary and is conducted by the local health departments. Health departments are required to comply with Michigan’s WQS according to R 333.12544 of the Public Health Code, 1978 PA 368 (Act 368), as amended. According to R 333.12541 of Act 368, a local health officer or an authorized representative of a local health department that conducts tests at bathing beaches is required to notify the MDEQ and other entities of the test results within 36 hours of conducting a test or evaluation. This rule also states that the local health department may petition the circuit court for an injunction ordering the owners of a beach to close the beach.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Security Threatens Northern Border Wildernesses
    Wilderness In Peril: Border Security Measures Threaten Wilderness along the Northern Border with Canada An Analysis Prepared by Wilderness Watch October 2012 Wilderness Watch P.O. Box 9175 Missoula, MT 59807 406-542-2048 www.wildernesswatch.org For more information, contact: George Nickas, Executive Director Kevin Proescholdt, Conservation Director [email protected] [email protected] 406-542-2048 612-201-9266 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary………………………………………………...…………….Page 3 Introduction………………………………………………………..………..….....Page 4 Background…………………………………………………..………………....…Page 4 A. Early 20th Century Border Easements B. International Boundary Treaties with Canada C. 2005 REAL ID Act D. 2006 Interagency Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Border Patrol Practices on the Southern Border and Lessons for the North……………………………………………………………….Page 9 A. Border Wall Construction B. Illegal Roads and Vehicle Routes C. Border Security Infrastructure D. Motorized Patrols Emerging Major Threats to Wildernesses near the Northern Border……...…Page 13 A. Congressional Legislation B. Northern Border Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement C. 2006 MOU and Motorized Patrols D. Administrative Waiver of Federal Laws E. Clearing and Construction in Border Reservations F. Conclusion Needed Actions to Reestablish and Affirm Wilderness Protections Along the Northern Border……………………………………….……………..Page 17 A. Existing Homeland Security Laws B. 2006 MOU C. Northern Border PEIS D. Pending Legislation E. Restore Wilderness Protection Appendix - Wildernesses at Risk along the Northern Border………………....Page 18 3 Executive Summary Under the guise of border security, a plethora of new and proposed laws, policies, memoranda, and other governmental actions pose an unprecedented threat to Wildernesses, including in many national parks, along our nation’s Northern Border. This whitepaper describes the threats and presents several recommendations for securing the protection of Wilderness and parks along the Northern Border.
    [Show full text]
  • Emmet Cheboygan Lake Michigan Lake Superior Lake
    Superior Region - East RoadRoad andand TrailTrail BicyclingBicycling GuideGuide ) X M Whitefish Twp Park !! ! Whitefish Point Vermillion _ !! Twomile Weatherhogs reek Lk. ns C Lk. Lake Superior Crisp Point ) Brow Browns Marsh Lakes d R Lk. t Be in tsy McMullan Lakes o Ri v P e r h 11 s i CR 412 f e t T Hawkins i hree h M Lk. W i l e Shelldrake Dam 9 Little Lake Harbor C r Betsy e State Forest Campground e River Little!! _¬ k X ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Lk. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bodi Lake 9 9 ! ! Andrus Lake ! ! ! Andrus ! X ! Bear Lk. X ! ! ! ! ! State Forest Campground Lk. Mouth of Two Hearted River ! Ile Parisienne ! ! ! Culhane State Forest Campground ! ! !! 9 !! !! Bodi Lk. ! Lk. State Forest Campground! X ! ! ! ! ! s ! X ! Bet y ! ! ! R ! Culhane! Lake ! ! ! i ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! v ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! 9 e ! ! ! ! ! ! ! State Forest Campground r !! ! ! ! ! ! Lake Superior ! Shelldrake ! r ! ! Randolph Muskallonge Lake State Park e Muskrat ! ! ! ! ! 9 ! v ! ! ! i ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 9 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! State Forest Campground! ! ! ! ! ! R ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! r ! ! Lk. ! ! ! ! e ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !iv ! ! ! ! d Lakes ! ! ! ! ! ! R ! ! ) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! e ! r ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !e! ! !! ! t ! Section k ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! c ! ! ! ! !! ! ! u ! ! ! ! r ! S ! ! ! ! ! d ! ! ! ! ! ! a S ! ! ! Deer! Park ! X n ! ! ! ! ! ! ! i ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! l ! ! ! e ! ! B Mud ! ! ! u ! ! ! X ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Woodland Park ! ! H !! GRAND MARAISc ! ! Four Lk. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! o ! ! ! k ! ! ! ! ! ! !
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Beach Monitoring Report
    MI/DEQ/WRD-17/008 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER RESOURCES DIVISION MARCH 2017 STAFF REPORT MICHIGAN BEACH MONITORING YEAR 2016 ANNUAL REPORT INTRODUCTION The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program is summarized in the January 1997 report entitled, “A Strategic Environmental Quality Monitoring Program for Michigan’s Surface Waters” (Strategy) (MDEQ, 1997). The objectives of the beach monitoring component of the Strategy are listed below: 1. Assist local health departments to implement and strengthen beach monitoring programs. 2. Create and maintain a statewide database. 3. Determine whether waters of the state are safe for total body contact recreation. 4. Compile data to determine overall water quality. 5. Evaluate the effectiveness of MDEQ programs in attaining Water Quality Standards (WQS) for pathogen indicators. 1. ASSIST LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS TO IMPLEMENT AND STRENGTHEN BEACH MONITORING PROGRAMS Beach Monitoring The monitoring of beaches in Michigan is voluntary and is conducted by the local health departments. Health departments are required to comply with Michigan’s WQS according to R 333.12544 of the Public Health Code, 1978 PA 368 (Act 368), as amended. According to R 333.12541 of Act 368, a local health officer or an authorized representative of a local health department that conducts tests at bathing beaches is required to notify the MDEQ and other entities of the test results within 36 hours of conducting a test or evaluation. This rule also states that the local health department may petition the circuit court for an injunction ordering the owners of a beach to close the beach.
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Beaches 2008
    National List of Beaches September 2008 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington DC 20460 EPA-823-R-08-004 Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 States Alabama........................................................................................................................................... 3 Alaska .............................................................................................................................................. 5 California.......................................................................................................................................... 6 Connecticut .................................................................................................................................... 15 Delaware........................................................................................................................................ 17 Florida ............................................................................................................................................ 18 Georgia .......................................................................................................................................... 31 Hawaii ............................................................................................................................................ 33 Illinois ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Houghton's Goldenrod
    U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service RECOVERY PLAN FOR HOUGHTON’S GOLDENROD (SOLIDAGO HOUGHTONII A. GRAY) Prepared by Michael R. Penskar Michigan Natural Features Inventory 8th Floor Mason Bldg., P.O. Box 30444 Lansing, Michigan 48909-7944 for Region 3 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ft. Snelling, Minnesota Approved: e onal irector, U.S. Fish an ildlife Service c~ Ii-lY\-~ Date: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Current Status: Solidago houghtonji (Houghton’s goldenrod), classified as threatened, is endemic primarily to the northernmost regions of Lakes Huron and Michigan in Michigan and Ontario. Of 58 known occurrences in the United States, at least portions of 32 are on public land and four are within private nature preserves. At least 33 of the U.S. occurrences are considered to be of good quality and highly viable. Several historic sites need to be surveyed to determine if populations there are still extant and intact. Habitat Reuuirements and Limitin2 Factors: This species is generally restricted to narrow bands of open, calcareous, lakeshore habitat. The species’ primary limiting factor is its restricted habitat, which requires the natural dynamics of the Great Lakes system to maintain a suitable environment. Preliminary findings from breeding system studies indicate that this species is self- incompatible, and requires outcrossing and insect pollen vectors to successfully set seed. The conservation of this species requires the maintenance of mature adult plants and their habitat, as well as the critical processes that maintain habitat. The current major threats to Solidago houghtonii are development and its ancillary activities, and the overuse of shoreline areas for recreational activities, particularly off-road-vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Annual Beach Monitoring Report
    MI/DEQ/WB-08/069 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER BUREAU NOVEMBER 2008 STAFF REPORT MICHIGAN BEACH MONITORING YEAR 2007 ANNUAL REPORT INTRODUCTION The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program, is summarized in the January 1997 report entitled, “A Strategic Environmental Quality Monitoring Program for Michigan’s Surface Waters” (Strategy) (MDEQ, 1997). The objectives of the beach monitoring component of the Strategy are listed below: 1. Assist local health departments to implement and strengthen beach monitoring programs. 2. Determine whether waters of the state are safe for total body contact recreation. 3. Create and maintain a statewide database. 4. Compile data to determine overall water quality. 5. Evaluate the effectiveness of MDEQ programs in attaining water quality standards (WQS) for pathogen indicators. 1. ASSIST LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS TO IMPLEMENT AND STRENGTHEN BEACH MONITORING PROGRAMS Beach Monitoring The monitoring of beaches in Michigan is voluntary and is conducted by the local health departments. Health departments are required to comply with Michigan’s WQS according to R 333.12544 of the Public Health Code, 1978 PA 368 (Act 368), as amended. According to R 333.12541 of Act 368, a local health officer or an authorized representative of a local health department that conducts tests at bathing beaches is required to notify the MDEQ and other entities of the test results within 36 hours of conducting a test or evaluation. This rule also states that the local health department may petition the circuit court for an injunction ordering the owners of a beach to close the beach.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Beach Monitoring Year 2014 Annual Report
    MI/DEQ/WRD-15/022 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER RESOURCES DIVISION JUNE 2015 STAFF REPORT MICHIGAN BEACH MONITORING YEAR 2014 ANNUAL REPORT INTRODUCTION The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program is summarized in the January 1997 report entitled, “A Strategic Environmental Quality Monitoring Program for Michigan’s Surface Waters” (Strategy) (MDEQ, 1997). The objectives of the beach monitoring component of the Strategy are listed below: 1. Assist local health departments to implement and strengthen beach monitoring programs. 2. Create and maintain a statewide database. 3. Determine whether waters of the state are safe for total body contact recreation. 4. Compile data to determine overall water quality. 5. Evaluate the effectiveness of MDEQ programs in attaining Water Quality Standards (WQS) for pathogen indicators. 1. ASSIST LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS TO IMPLEMENT AND STRENGTHEN BEACH MONITORING PROGRAMS Beach Monitoring The monitoring of beaches in Michigan is voluntary and is conducted by the local health departments. Health departments are required to comply with Michigan’s WQS according to R 333.12544 of the Public Health Code, 1978 PA 368 (Act 368), as amended. According to R 333.12541 of Act 368, a local health officer or an authorized representative of a local health department that conducts tests at bathing beaches is required to notify the MDEQ and other entities of the test results within 36 hours of conducting a test or evaluation. This rule also states that the local health department may petition the circuit court for an injunction ordering the owners of a beach to close the beach.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Beach Monitoring Year 2013 Annual Report
    MI/DEQ/WRD-14/025 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER RESOURCES DIVISION SEPTEMBER 2013 STAFF REPORT MICHIGAN BEACH MONITORING YEAR 2013 ANNUAL REPORT INTRODUCTION The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program, is summarized in the January 1997 report entitled, “A Strategic Environmental Quality Monitoring Program for Michigan’s Surface Waters” (Strategy) (MDEQ, 1997). The objectives of the beach monitoring component of the Strategy are listed below: 1. Assist local health departments to implement and strengthen beach monitoring programs. 2. Create and maintain a statewide database. 3. Determine whether waters of the state are safe for total body contact recreation. 4. Compile data to determine overall water quality. 5. Evaluate the effectiveness of MDEQ programs in attaining Water Quality Standards (WQS) for pathogen indicators. 1. ASSIST LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS TO IMPLEMENT AND STRENGTHEN BEACH MONITORING PROGRAMS Beach Monitoring The monitoring of beaches in Michigan is voluntary and conducted by the local health departments. Health departments are required to comply with Michigan’s WQS according to R 333.12544 of the Public Health Code, 1978 PA 368 (Act 368), as amended. According to R 333.12541 of Act 368, a local health officer or an authorized representative of a local health department that conducts tests at bathing beaches is required to notify the MDEQ and other entities of the test results within 36 hours of conducting a test or evaluation. This rule also states that the local health department may petition the circuit court for an injunction ordering the owners of a beach to close the beach.
    [Show full text]