DOCSLIB.ORG

Testing the Waters 2010 (Pdf)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Testing the Waters 2010 (Pdf) July 2010 Testing the Waters A Guide to Water Quality at Vacation Beaches TWENTIETH ANNUAL REPORT Authors Mark Dorfman Kirsten Sinclair Rosselot Project Design and Development David Beckman Natural Resources Defense Council Jon Devine Natural Resources Defense Council Michelle Mehta Natural Resources Defense Council About NRDC The Natural Resources Defense Council is an international nonprofit environmental organization with more than 1.3 million members and online activists. Since 1970, our lawyers, scientists, and other environmental specialists have worked to protect the world’s natural resources, public health, and the environment. NRDC has offices in New York City, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, San Francisco, Montana, and Beijing. Visit us at www.nrdc.org. Acknowledgments NRDC wishes to acknowledge the support of The Morris & Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation, The Campbell Foundation, Naomi and Nehemiah Cohen Foundation, Crown Family Philanthropies, Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation, Inc., Bernard F. and Alva B. Gimbel Foundation, The Joyce Foundation, The McKnight Foundation, The David and Lucile Packard Foundation, The Pisces Foundation, The Prospect Hill Foundation, Resources Legacy Fund Foundation, Sandler Foundation, Mary Jean Smeal Clean Water Fund, and The Summit Fund of Washington. NRDC would like to thank Henry Henderson, Josh Mogerman, and Mariya Stepanenko for researching and reviewing various aspects of the report this year and Carol James for distributing the report nation wide. Thank you to Alexandra Kennaugh for managing the production of the report, to Bonnie Greenfield for designing it, and to Kathryn McGrath, Will Tam, and Auden Shim for creating a dynamic presentation of the report on the NRDC website. We would also like to thank Ynes Cabral and Linda Escalante for their skillful Spanish translations and Grace Murray and Elise Marton for their proofreading assistance. Many thanks to members of our media team Sherry Goldberg, Courtney Hamilton, Elizabeth Heyd, Serena Ingre, Valerie Jaffee, Jessica Lass, Josh Mogerman, Jenny Powers, and Kate Slusark for orchestrating the release of the report to the press. Thanks to Sarah Chasis, Noah Garrison, Allen Hershkowitz, Larry Levine, Leila Monroe, Adrianna Quintero, Suzanne Struglinski, and Andrew Wetzler for releasing and blogging about the report for NRDC this year and Christy Leavitt and Piper Crowell for arranging releases by chapters of Environment America. We wish also to thank the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for sharing data with us again this year, and to the state program coordinators, who provided information for the state chapters along with review of the monitoring and notification data. Thanks, especially, to all those federal, state, and local officials who work hard every day to keep our beaches clean and to clean up the sources of beachwater pollution. NRDC President: Frances Beinecke NRDC Executive Director: Peter Lehner NRDC Director of Communications: Phil Gutis NRDC Deputy Director of Communications: Lisa Goffredi NRDC Publications Director: Anthony Clark NRDC Publications Editor: Carlita Salazar Project Manager: Alexandra Kennaugh Design and Production: Bonnie Greenfield Copyright 2010 by the Natural Resources Defense Council. TESTING THE WATERS: A GUIDE TO WATER QUALITY AT VACATION BEACHES Table of Contents Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................................................................v National Overview ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1 Sources of Beachwater Pollution .....................................................................................................................................14 Chapter 2 The Impacts of Beach Pollution .....................................................................................................................................20 Chapter 3 Plan of Action ................................................................................................................................................................32 Chapter 4 Beachwater Quality Monitoring Programs and State-by-State Results.............................................................................44 Alabama Florida Louisiana Minnesota North Carolina South Carolina Alaska Georgia Maine Mississippi Ohio Texas California Hawaii Maryland New Hampshire Oregon Virginia Connecticut Illinois Massachusetts New Jersey Pennsylvania Washington Delaware Indiana Michigan New York Rhode Island Wisconsin Figures Figure N-1. Regional Differences in Closing/Advisory Days, 2006–2009 .........................................................................1 Figure N-2. Regional Differences in Percent Exceedance of National Standards, 2006–2009 ...........................................2 Figure N-3. Total Closing/Advisory Days, 2000–2009 (excluding extended and permanent) ...........................................4 Figure N-4. Reported Reasons for Closings/Advisories in 2009 ........................................................................................5 Figure N-5. Report Reasons for Closings/Advisories, 2000–2009 .....................................................................................5 Figure N-6. Sources of Pollution That Caused Closings/Advisories in 2009 .....................................................................6 Figure N-7. Sources of Pollution That Caused Closings/Advisories, 2000–2009 ..............................................................6 Figure N-8. Percent Exceedance for All Coastal and Great Lakes States Combined, 2006–2009.......................................7 (based on 2,655 beaches reported in each of the four years) Figure 1-1. A Rough Illustration of the Prevalence of Combined Sewer Systems in the United States .............................15 Figure 2-1. Influence of Heavy Rainfall on Occurrence of E. coli Infections ...................................................................22 Figure 2-2. Expansion of HAB Problems in the United States ........................................................................................25 Figure 2-3. The Value of the Coastal Economy (2007) ...................................................................................................27 Figure 3-1. A Re-Engineered Stormwater Outfall in Racine, Wisconsin .........................................................................33 Figure 3-2. Lag Time Associated With Current Water Quality Monitoring and Public Notification Methods ................39 Figure 4-1. Why Don’t 2009 Percent Exceedances Match? .............................................................................................49 iii Natural Resources Defense Council Testing the Waters 2010 Tables Table N-1. Rank of States by Percentage of Beachwater Samples Exceeding the National Standard in 2009 .....................8 Table N-2. Beaches With More than 25% of Samples Exceeding the EPA’s Single-Sample Maximum Standards ..............9 for Designated Beach Areas in 2009 (limited to beaches with at least 10 total samples reported for the year Table N-3. Repeat Offenders: 15 Beaches With More Than 25% of Samples Exceeding the EPA’s Single-Sample ..........13 Maximum Standards for Designated Beach Areas, Each Year, 2006–2009 (Alphabetical by State, County, and Beach) Table 2-1. Pathogens and Swimming-Associated Illnesses ...............................................................................................20 Table 2-2. Possible Influence of Climate Change on Climate-Susceptible Pathogens ......................................................23 Table 2-3. Algae and Their Threats to Human Health ....................................................................................................25 Table 2-4. Cost Estimates for Illnesses Associated With Polluted Water Due to Lost Wages and Medical Care ...............28 Table 3-1. Beachwater Quality Standards Required by the BEACH Act .........................................................................37 Table 4-1. State Distribution of BEACH Act Funding for Beachwater Quality Monitoring and Notification .................44 for 2009 and 2010 Table 4-2. State Coastal Beachwater Quality Standards ..................................................................................................46 iv Natural Resources Defense Council Testing the Waters 2010 TESTING THE WATERS: A GUIDE TO WATER QUALITY AT VACATION BEACHES Executive Summary Twentieth Annual Report In 2009, beach closings and advisories hit their sixth-highest level in the 20 years the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) has been tracking them. The continuing high number of closing and advisory days, combined with a relatively constant level of bacterial contamination at ocean, bay, and Great Lakes beaches, suggests that our nation’s beaches require a more concerted effort to identify and control the sources of water pollution that put swimmers at risk. Even in the relatively dry 2009 beach For the fifth consecutive year, we were able to season, stormwater runoff contributed determine not only the number of closings and advisories, to more than 80% of the closing but also the number of times that each beach violated current public health standards. The percent of beach and advisory days with a reported monitoring samples exceeding national health standards contamination source.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • S T a T E O F N E W Y O R K 3695--A 2009-2010
    S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 3695--A 2009-2010 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y January 28, 2009 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. ENGLEBRIGHT -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. KOON, McENENY -- read once and referred to the Committee on Tourism, Arts and Sports Development -- recommitted to the Committee on Tour- ism, Arts and Sports Development in accordance with Assembly Rule 3, sec. 2 -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the parks, recreation and historic preservation law, in relation to the protection and management of the state park system THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: 1 Section 1. Legislative findings and purpose. The legislature finds the 2 New York state parks, and natural and cultural lands under state manage- 3 ment which began with the Niagara Reservation in 1885 embrace unique, 4 superlative and significant resources. They constitute a major source of 5 pride, inspiration and enjoyment of the people of the state, and have 6 gained international recognition and acclaim. 7 Establishment of the State Council of Parks by the legislature in 1924 8 was an act that created the first unified state parks system in the 9 country. By this act and other means the legislature and the people of 10 the state have repeatedly expressed their desire that the natural and 11 cultural state park resources of the state be accorded the highest 12 degree of protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan State Parks Advisory Committee
    MINUTES Michigan State Parks Advisory Committee Wednesday, June 9, 2021 2:00 p.m. Microsoft Teams Meeting / (248) 509-0316 | ID: 626 385 177# PRESENT FOR THE MSPAC Attending remotely: Ann Conklin; Canton Township, Wayne County, Michigan Shaun McKeon; Lansing Twp., Ingham, County, Michigan Bob Hoffmeyer; Lansing, Ingham County, Michigan Mike MacDonald; Okemos, Meridian Twp., Michigan Mary Pitcher; Lake Township, Benzie County, Michigan Chris Graham; Ann Arbor, Washtenaw County, Michigan ABSENT Jim Bradley Julie Clark Mike Foote OTHERS PRESENT Ron Olson, Chief, PRD Jacklin Blodgett, PRD Scott Pratt, PRD Karis Floyd, PRD Amanda Treadwell, PRD Michael Desnoyer, PRD Vicki McGhee, PRD Griselda Trevino, PRD Barbara Graves, PRD OPENING COMMENTS Committee member Conklin called the meeting to order at 2:02 p.m. and asked for a roll call. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ann Conklin motioned for approval of the April 14, 2021 meeting minutes. The motion was moved by Mike McDonald, supported by Chris Graham, and passed unanimously. 1 MICHIGAN STATE PARKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES – June 9, 2021 GENERAL UPDATES Ron Olson, Chief, PRD The fiscal year 2022 budget process continues, and our budget remains intact except for the removal of the Summer Youth Employment Program; core cities include Pontiac, Saginaw, and Flint and groups are letting it be known that this is a valued activity. Still waiting on word of federal funds and if they will be allotted for shovel ready projects. Numbers are trending upwards in all categories and because of the heavy visitation and staffing issues, challenges remain. He has talked to five other state park systems who are having the same problem with hiring.
    [Show full text]
  • Doggin' America's Beaches
    Doggin’ America’s Beaches A Traveler’s Guide To Dog-Friendly Beaches - (and those that aren’t) Doug Gelbert illustrations by Andrew Chesworth Cruden Bay Books There is always something for an active dog to look forward to at the beach... DOGGIN’ AMERICA’S BEACHES Copyright 2007 by Cruden Bay Books All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Cruden Bay Books PO Box 467 Montchanin, DE 19710 www.hikewithyourdog.com International Standard Book Number 978-0-9797074-4-5 “Dogs are our link to paradise...to sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring - it was peace.” - Milan Kundera Ahead On The Trail Your Dog On The Atlantic Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Gulf Of Mexico Beaches 6 Your Dog On The Pacific Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Great Lakes Beaches 0 Also... Tips For Taking Your Dog To The Beach 6 Doggin’ The Chesapeake Bay 4 Introduction It is hard to imagine any place a dog is happier than at a beach. Whether running around on the sand, jumping in the water or just lying in the sun, every dog deserves a day at the beach. But all too often dog owners stopping at a sandy stretch of beach are met with signs designed to make hearts - human and canine alike - droop: NO DOGS ON BEACH.
    [Show full text]
  • Boardwalk Interactions with a Lake Michigan Dune System
    Boardwalk Interactions with a Lake Michigan Dune System by Gabe LePage, Bastian Bouman, Benjamin Johnson, Ryan Kiper, and Madison Smith FYRES: Dunes Research Report # 17 May 2015 Department of Geology, Geography and Environmental Studies Calvin College Grand Rapids, Michigan ABSTRACT Boardwalks enable visitors to enjoy dunes in a way that protects sensitive dune environments from human impacts, but a tension remains as a boardwalk itself alters a dune system. This study investigates how a boardwalk in Hoffmaster State Park, Michigan affects human interactions with a Lake Michigan coastal dune system. In autumn 2014, the boardwalk was mapped and the quality of its features assessed. Human impacts were investigated by documenting unmanaged trails and interviewing park staff. Ecological communities were mapped, and vegetation conditions near the trails were recorded. The boardwalk is part of a managed trail system connecting a visitor center with the beach; the boardwalk gives visitors access to a high dune lookout over Lake Michigan. The boardwalk ends at two viewing platforms and is worn but functional. A network of unmanaged trails indicate that people leave the boardwalk. The boardwalk and the unmanaged trails interrupt the ecological communities. The study results suggest that the boardwalk enables enjoyment of the dune and protects vulnerable environments, but it also affects the formation of unmanaged trails and influences dune processes. Understanding the spatial patterns of human interaction with the dune can inform the planning process as park staff work towards reconstructing the boardwalk in the next few years. INTRODUCTION Boardwalks provide people with experiences of fragile natural areas while simultaneously protecting vulnerable environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of Natural and Preserves
    The Leelanau Conservancy An Accredited Organization The Leelanau Conservancy was awarded accreditation status in September, 008. The Land Trust Accreditation Commission awards the accreditation seal to community institutions that meet national quality standards for protecting important natural places and working lands forever. Learn more at the Land Trust Alliance website: www.landtrustaccreditation.org. Map of Natural and Preserves Leelanau State Park and Open to the public Grand Traverse Light Best seen on a guided hike Lighthouse West Natural Area Finton Natural Area Critical areas, o limits Je Lamont Preserve Kehl Lake Natural Area North Soper Preserve Manitou Houdek Dunes M201 Island Natural Area NORTHPORT Gull Island Nedows Bay M 22 Preserve OMENA Belanger 637 Creek South Leland Village Green Preserve Manitou Whittlesey Lake MichiganIsland LELAND 641 Preserve Hall Beach North PESHAWBESTOWN Frazier-Freeland Manitou Passage Preserve Lake Leelanau M204 Whaleback Suttons Bay Sleeping Bear Dunes Natural Area 45th Parallel LAKE Park National Lakeshore LEELANAU SUTTONS Narrows 643 Natural Area GLEN Little M 22 BAY Crystal River HAVEN Traverse GLEN Lake Krumweide ARBOR 633 Forest 645 Reserve Little Big Greeno Preserve Glen Glen Lime Mebert Creek Preserve BINGHAM Teichner Lake Lake Lake 643 Preserve South M109 616 Lake Grand BURDICKVILLE MAPLE Leelanau Traverse CITY CEDAR 641 Chippewa Run Bay 669 651 M 22 Natural Area M 22 677 Cedar River 667 614 Cedar Sleeping Bear Dunes Lake Preserve Visitor's Center EMPIRE 616 DeYoung 651 616 Natural Area GREILICKVILLE M 72 Benzie County Grand Traverse County TRAVERSE CITY Conserving Leelanau’s Land, Water, and Scenic Character Who We Are We’re the group that, since 1988, has worked to protect the places that you love and the character that makes the Leelanau Peninsula so unique.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Port of Rochester & Genesee River Harbor Management Plan
    2016 Draft Port of Rochester & Genesee River Harbor Management Plan This report was prepared with funding provided by the New York State Department of State under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund. Photos provided by NYS DOS and City of Rochester Port of Rochester-Genesee River Harbor Management Plan City of Rochester, New York Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE & BENEFIT OF THE HARBOR MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................................................... 1 1.2 LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY FOR LOCAL HARBOR MANAGEMENT......................................................... 2 1.2.1 The HMP as a Component of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program ................. 2 1.3 HARBOR MANAGEMENT AREA ................................................................................................. 3 1.3.1 Harbor Management Area ............................................................................................ 3 1.3.2 Port of Rochester and Rochester Harbor Designations ................................................. 6 1.3.3 Port Redevelopment Project .......................................................................................... 6 1.3.4 HMA Historical Context ................................................................................................. 7 1.4 PUBLIC & STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH DURING HMP PREPARATION ................................................ 15 1.4.1 Project Advisory Committee Meetings .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1968 General Plan
    I I I I I I MONTEREY COUNTY GENERAL PLAN I MONTEREY COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA I I I I ADOPTED BY THE MONTEREY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 10, 1968 I ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF MONTEREY COUNTY OCTOBER 22, 1968 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 N I I I MONTEREY COUNTY I I I I I I PREFACE I The Monterey County General Plan is an attempt to establish a county philosophy based on the values and desires of the people. This in turn becomes a valid basis for decisions by public bodies as well as private enterprise. Such a pro­ cedure is vitally needed in our rapidly changing environment. The General Plan I is a study of the ever changing pattern of Monterey County --a mirror in which to review the past, to comprehend the present, and to contemplate the future, This plan reflects years of research and study as well as many other reports such as I the continuing Facts and Figures, Recreation in Monterey County, Beach Acqui­ sition, and other plans which are shown as separate documents h~cause of the volume of material. I The size of Monterey County, its variety of climate, vegetation, and land forms make it imperative that only large land uses or broad proposals be used to portray geographically the objectives desired for the future development of the County. I Accordingly, in addition to the maps, greater emphasis in the General Plan is placed on the text which conveys in words the objectives as well as the princi­ ples and standards recommended to make them effective.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Pacific Coast Winter Window Survey Results
    2020 Winter Window Survey for Snowy Plovers on U.S. Pacific Coast with 2013-2020 Results for Comparison. Note: blanks indicate no survey was conducted. REGION SITE OWNER 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020 Date Primary Observer(s) Gray's Harbor Copalis Spit State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum Conner Creek State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Damon Point WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Oyhut Spit WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Ocean Shores to Ocean City 4 10 0 9 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis County Total 4 10 0 9 Pacific Midway Beach Private, State Parks 22 28 58 66 27-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Graveyard Spit Shoalwater Indian Tribe 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum, R. Ashley Leadbetter Point NWR USFWS, State Parks 34 3 15 0 11-Feb W. Ritchie South Long Beach Private 6 0 7 0 10-Feb W. Ritchie Benson Beach State Parks 0 0 0 0 20-Jan W. Ritchie County Total 62 31 80 66 Washington Total 66 41 80 75 Clatsop Fort Stevens State Park (Clatsop Spit) ACOE, OPRD 10 19 21 20-Jan T. Pyle, D. Osis DeLaura Beach OPRD No survey Camp Rilea DOD 0 0 0 No survey Sunset Beach OPRD 0 No survey Del Rio Beach OPRD 0 No survey Necanicum Spit OPRD 0 0 0 20-Jan J. Everett, S. Everett Gearhart Beach OPRD 0 No survey Columbia R-Necanicum R. OPRD No survey County Total 0 10 19 21 Tillamook Nehalem Spit OPRD 0 17 26 19-Jan D.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Michigan Water Trail Plan, Phase I: Inventory & Assessment
    LAKE MICHIGAN WATER TRAIL PLAN, PHASE I: Inventory and Analysis of Access Sites in Support of a Lake Michigan Water Trail Southwest Michigan, West Michigan, Northwest Michigan, and the Upper Peninsula July 2014 Prepared by the in partnership with: This project was funded, in part, by the Michigan Coastal Zone Management Program, Department of Environmental Quality Office of the Great Lakes and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. PROJECT TEAM from the: TABLE OF CONTENTS West Michigan Shoreline Regional Introduction and Background...................... 2 Development Commission Vision and Goals .......................................4 What is a Water Trail? ...........................4 Drawing the Larger Picture ....................4 Visions, Goals, and Objectives.................5 Erin Kuhn, Executive Director Inventory Process .....................................6 Kathy Evans, Program Manager Regional Water Trail Segments ...................7 Amy Haack, Program Manager Southwest Michigan Segment ................9 West Michigan Segment ......................10 Joshua Croff, Planner Northwest Michigan Segment ...............11 Upper Peninsula Segment ....................12 WMSRDC Officers Action Plan .............................................13 Enhancement Zones/Analysis .....................13 Joe Lenius, Chairperson Southwest Michigan ..........................14 Mason County Commissioner West Michigan ...................................16 Susie Hughes, Vice-Chairperson Northwest Michigan
    [Show full text]
  • AMENDED and RESTATED COMMUNITY MASTER PLAN 2021 This Page Intentionally Left Blank
    OSCODA TOWNSHIP AMENDED AND RESTATED COMMUNITY MASTER PLAN 2021 This page intentionally left blank. OSCODA TOWNSHIP AMENDED AND RESTATED COMMUNITY MASTER PLAN 2021 TOWNSHIP BOARD Ann Richards, Supervisor Jaimie McGuire, Treasurer Joshua Sutton, Clerk Timothy Cummings, Trustee Steve Wusterbarth, Trustee Jeremy Spencer, Trustee William Palmer, Trustee PLANNING COMMISSION Mimi McDonald, Chairperson Edward Davis, Vice Chairperson Bernie Schenk Bill Palmer Cathy Wusterbarth John Minor Dan Gary (2020) Bob Tazior (2020) ADMINISTRATION Michael Mitchell, Township Superintendent Eric Szymanski, Planning & Zoning Director Todd Dickerson, Economic Improvement Director 2018 COMMUNITY MASTER PLAN 2019 STRATEGIC PLAN 2021 AMENDED AND RESTATED COMMUNITY MASTER PLAN LIST OF MAPS LIST OF TABLES Map 1: Regional Setting 13 Table 1: Master Plan and Zoning Ordinance Comparison 9 Map 2: Transportation Network 31 Table 2: Population Change in Oscoda Township 18 Map 3: Recreational Resources 35 Table 3: Population Change 19 Map 4: Recreational Resources 35 Table 4: Age Distribution 19 Map 5: Topography 39 Table 5: Household Characteristics 21 Map 6: Soils 39 Table 6: Housing Stock (2015 ACS) 22 Map 7: Wetlands 40 Table 7: Housing Tenure (2015 ACS) 23 Map 8: Waterbodies 40 Table 8: Age of Housing Structure 23 Map 9: Federal and State Land 43 Table 9: Educational Attainment (2015 ACS) 25 Map 10: Existing Land Use 49 Table 10: Income and Poverty (2015 ACS) 27 Map 11: Growth & Investment Areas 67 Table 11: Existing Land Use Calculations 46 Map 12.1: Future Land Use
    [Show full text]
  • Negwegon State Park Harrisville State Park P.O
    Negwegon State Park Harrisville State Park P.O. Box 326 Backcountry Guide Harrisville, MI 48740 Great Lakes, Great Times, Great Outdoors 989-724-5126 www.michigan.gov/dnr Introduction Backcountry camping is available in Negwegon State Park from April through November. This type of camping can be a very rewarding experience as some of Negwegon State Park’s most scenic areas are accessible only by hiking, kayaking or canoeing along the Lake Huron shore. The remoteness and serenity of backcountry camping draws many people; however, those same reasons necessitate careful planning and preparation. You are responsible for your own safety. Please carefully read the following information before venturing into the backcountry. On the Shores of Lake Huron Trip Planning Read this brochure carefully to make an honest determination of your abilities. Camping season is from April 1 through November 30. Pre-registration is required prior to setting up camp. Backcountry campsites may be reserved by calling Harrisville State Park 989- 724-5126 between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. summer season, Monday through Friday during the off season. You may also register in person at Harrisville State Park. Road conditions for Sand Hill Trail can vary based on weather and other environmental factors. Conditions can be confirmed by calling Harrisville State Park 989-724-5126. Driving directions - Take US-23 12 miles north of Harrisville to Black River Rd, Go east on Black River Rd for 1.5 miles, Drive North on Sand Hill Trail for 2.5 miles, Go east on the gravel park road 1.25 miles to the parking area.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Annual Beach Monitoring Report
    MI/DEQ/WRD-12/034 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER RESOURCES DIVISION AUGUST 2012 STAFF REPORT MICHIGAN BEACH MONITORING YEAR 2011 ANNUAL REPORT INTRODUCTION The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program, is summarized in the January 1997 report entitled, “A Strategic Environmental Quality Monitoring Program for Michigan’s Surface Waters” (Strategy) (MDEQ, 1997). The objectives of the beach monitoring component of the Strategy are listed below: 1. Assist local health departments to implement and strengthen beach monitoring programs. 2. Create and maintain a statewide database. 3. Determine whether waters of the state are safe for total body contact recreation. 4. Compile data to determine overall water quality. 5. Evaluate the effectiveness of MDEQ programs in attaining Water Quality Standards (WQS) for pathogen indicators. 1. ASSIST LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS TO IMPLEMENT AND STRENGTHEN BEACH MONITORING PROGRAMS Beach Monitoring The monitoring of beaches in Michigan is voluntary and is conducted by the local health departments. Health departments are required to comply with Michigan’s WQS according to R 333.12544 of the Public Health Code, 1978 PA 368 (Act 368), as amended. According to R 333.12541 of Act 368, a local health officer or an authorized representative of a local health department that conducts tests at bathing beaches is required to notify the MDEQ and other entities of the test results within 36 hours of conducting a test or evaluation. This rule also states that the local health department may petition the circuit court for an injunction ordering the owners of a beach to close the beach.
    [Show full text]