The Trump Campaign Gives Journalists a Comeuppance: There’S No Substitute for Listening to Voters FACE the NATION

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Trump Campaign Gives Journalists a Comeuppance: There’S No Substitute for Listening to Voters FACE the NATION NIEMAN REPORTS Why all reporters need to understand how science works How coverage of Native American issues is changing—for the better Obstacles and opportunities facing journalists with disabilities The Trump campaign gives journalists a comeuppance: There’s no substitute for listening to voters FACE THE NATION nr_spring_2016_covers_spine_032916.indd 1 4/1/16 4:28 PM Contributors The Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University Juliet Eilperin (page 28) www.niemanreports.org is The Washington Post’s White House bureau chief. An 18-year veteran of the Post, she covered the 2008 presidential campaign and fi ve congressional publisher campaigns. She is the author Ann Marie Lipinski of two books, including editor “Fight Club Politics: How James Geary Partisanship is Poisoning the senior editor House of Representatives,” Jan Gardner published in 2006. researcher/reporter Jonathan Seitz Tatiana Walk-Morris (page 34) is a Chicago- based journalist. Her work has appeared in editorial assistant DNAinfo Chicago, Crain’s Chicago Business, Eryn M. Carlson the Chicago Reader, The Chicago Defender, and The New York Times. design Pentagram editorial offices Michael Blanding (page 8) is a Boston-based One Francis Avenue, Cambridge, author and investigative journalist whose MA 02138-2098, 617-496-6308, work has appeared in The New Republic, Slate, [email protected] The Nation, and Wired. His most recent book, “The Map Thief,” was published in 2014. Copyright 2016 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. Periodicals postage paid at Paul Raeburn (page 16) writes the Tracker, Boston, Massachusetts and a column critiquing science journalism, for additional entries Undark magazine, based at MIT’s Knight Science Journalism program. He has been the science subscriptions/business editor at the AP and at BusinessWeek. 617-496-6299, [email protected] Subscription $25 a year, Jon Marcus (page 22) is higher-education editor $40 for two years; at The Hechinger Report, a foundation-supported add $10 per year for foreign airmail. nonprofi t news organization based at Columbia Single copies $7.50. University. His last article for Nieman Reports was Back copies are available from “Rewriting J-School.” the Nieman offi ce. Please address all subscription Genevieve Belmaker (page 40) is currently correspondence to: covering the confl ict in Israel and the West One Francis Avenue, Bank. She spent the past three years as a metro Cambridge, MA 02138-2098 reporter in New York City. Her work has appeared and change of address information to: in MediaShift and the Poynter Institute. P.O. Box 4951, Manchester, NH 03108 ISSN Number 0028-9817 Michelle Hackman (page 48) is a politics and Postmaster: Send address changes to breaking news reporter for Vox.com. She is a 2015 Nieman Reports P.O. Box 4951, graduate of Yale University and has written for Manchester, NH 03108 the Yale Daily News and The Wall Street Journal. You can fi nd her tweeting @MHackman. Nieman Reports (USPS #430-650) is published in March, June, Michael Fitzgerald (page 51) is a 2011 Nieman September, and December by Fellow who writes about innovation for The the Nieman Foundation at Harvard University, Boston Globe, The Economist, Fast Company, One Francis Avenue, MIT Sloan Management Review, The Wall Street Cambridge, MA 02138-2098 Journal, and other publications. BOTTOM: CALO IMAGES; AUBREY OPPOSITE TOP: TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP/GETTY nr_spring_2016_032416.indd A 3/30/16 12:41 PM Newsrooms are working to stay relevant as social media platforms proliferate and political campaigning undergoes big changes Contents Spring 2016 / Vol. 70 / No. 2 Features Departments storyboard cover From the Curator 2 Adjusting the Frame 8 By Ann Marie Lipinski How journalists and artists are fi nding On the Trail 28 Amid public disaff ection with the press complementary ways to tell stories Live@Lippmann 4 By Michael Blanding and the rise of social media, newsrooms The Marshall Project’s Gabriel Dance are rethinking campaign coverage By Juliet Eilperin Research and Reporting 16 Niemans@Work 6 Understanding how science works is The Future of Fact-Checking 34 Examining the aftermath of war, pushing By Tatiana Walk-Morris important for all journalists the Pulitzers forward, designing a survey By Paul Raeburn tool that delivers fast, accurate results Becoming Visible 22 How mainstream and tribal outlets are nieman journalism lab covering Native Americans—for the better The New Media Monopoly 54 Atul Gawande, By Jon Marcus With news outlets concentrating in major a surgeon cities, journalism faces a new imperative and journalist, watchdog By Joshua Benton is critical of science journals Neither Heroes Nor Victims 40 page 16 Covering the disability community with Books 56 sensitivity—and without sensationalism “Saving the Media: Capitalism, By Genevieve Belmaker Crowdfunding, and Democracy” By Julia Cagé Seen and Heard 48 The obstacles, opportunities, and latent Nieman Notes 60 prejudice facing journalists with disabilities By Michelle Hackman Sounding 62 Mónica Guzmán, NF ’16 Access for All 51 Making news sites easier to navigate cover: By Michael Fitzgerald Patrick Semansky/Associated Press nr_spring_2016_032416.indd 1 3/25/16 10:31 AM From the Curator these editors didn’t simply fail to foretell The depth of Trump’s the rise of Trump. In deciding for the vot- support eluded modern ers rather than covering them, they missed the story hiding in plain sight, the biggest measuring tools of this campaign. That same month, The New Yorker’s Evan Osnos was deep into reporting a piece that would turn out to be one of the most Statistician Nate Silver’s mirror-to- Loathing on the prescient of the season. In “The Fearful and America election forecasts lent a scientifi c the Frustrated,” he documented a six-state polish to coverage of our last two presiden- Campaign Trail journey through Trump country and his en- tial races. So precise, so accurate, so com- Once again, the counters with “a confederacy of the frustrat- forting. I recently reread a talk by a leading ed—less a constituency than a loose alliance national political columnist given at Harvard media discover of Americans who say they are betrayed by in the fall of 2007, 12 months before the elec- that there’s politicians, victimized by a changing world, tion and Silver’s laser-sharp predictions. She and enticed by Trump’s insurgency.” All spoke about the campaign and described the no substitute for the themes we now know to have fueled country as “one year away from the corona- talking to voters Trump’s run were ripe for harvest and ar- tion of the warrior queen.” Another pundit is rayed in his August story: economic despon- later recorded as concurring, asking rhetor- dency, toxic views of immigrants, hunger for ically: “Can an African-American man with a “hostile takeover of the Republican Party.” two years experience in the Senate be more “Over the last nine months, I was baffl ed electable than Hillary Clinton?” Big data and as reporters continued to treat the Trump Silver’s poll aggregation methods were a wel- phenomenon as a joke, even after he and his come assault on the guessing class. if casting for an act one in this supporters had provided abundant evidence But then came Trump and Bernie inglorious season of American political of their beliefs,” Osnos told me. “Recently, Sanders, the surprising socialist who would journalism, a mid-July moment in The that’s become a story, but it’s very late.” be president. Silver’s FiveThirtyEight called Huffi ngton Post newsroom might do. Instead, proof of Trump’s staying pow- Sanders’s victory over Clinton in Michigan “After watching and listening to Donald er combined with his escalating bigotry the “biggest primary polling upset ever.” Trump since he announced his candidacy focused the media on the question of how A post-mortem podcast by Silver and his col- for president, we have decided we won’t best to characterize a demagogue. Having leagues reminded me of childhood interro- report on Trump’s campaign as part of largely sat out the story that would ex- gations by my parents to determine which of The Huffi ngton Post’s political coverage,” amine the roots of his dark appeal, many their four children was responsible for some announced two senior editors. “If you are journalists turned to denouncing him and household calamity; so much fi nger-pointing interested in what The Donald has to say, his voters. If you were building a time cap- but no clear culprit. At one point in the pod- you’ll find it next to our stories on the sule of Campaign 2016 journalism, you cast, an exasperated staff er ventures: “There Kardashians and The Bachelorette.” would want to include this media writer’s were a whole bunch of things.” The imperial post was remarkable for its tweet about an internal newsroom memo: The limits of modern measuring tools effi cient dismissal of what we now know to “BuzzFeed Editor-in-Chief: Fair to call were underscored for me by a riveting recent be millions of voters. Like so many others, Trump ‘mendacious racist.’” Guardian story quoting anonymous Trump Many journalists dismissed Trump’s candidacy instead of talking to voters to understand his appeal ABITBOL OPPOSITE: LISA PRESS; STEVE HELBER/ASSOCIATED 2 nieman reports spring 2016 nr_spring_2016_032416.indd 2 3/25/16 10:31 AM voters at length, many of them describing themselves as “secret” or “closet” support- “saying ers, some fearful of being discovered. “Not what needs even my wife knows,” said one man. to be said” “The data revolution had relied on assumptions about how people behave— Yang Jisheng, this year’s evangelicals do X, liberal Acela-riders recipient of the Louis M. do Y—and it was enormously eff ective in Lyons Award for Conscience a conventional race,” Osnos wrote me.
Recommended publications
  • Analysis of Talk Shows Between Obama and Trump Administrations by Jack Norcross — 69
    Analysis of Talk Shows Between Obama and Trump Administrations by Jack Norcross — 69 An Analysis of the Political Affiliations and Professions of Sunday Talk Show Guests Between the Obama and Trump Administrations Jack Norcross Journalism Elon University Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements in an undergraduate senior capstone course in communications Abstract The Sunday morning talk shows have long been a platform for high-quality journalism and analysis of the week’s top political headlines. This research will compare guests between the first two years of Barack Obama’s presidency and the first two years of Donald Trump’s presidency. A quantitative content analysis of television transcripts was used to identify changes in both the political affiliations and profession of the guests who appeared on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” CBS’s “Face the Nation,” ABC’s “This Week” and “Fox News Sunday” between the two administrations. Findings indicated that the dominant political viewpoint of guests differed by show during the Obama administration, while all shows hosted more Republicans than Democrats during the Trump administration. Furthermore, U.S. Senators and TV/Radio journalists were cumulatively the most frequent guests on the programs. I. Introduction Sunday morning political talk shows have been around since 1947, when NBC’s “Meet the Press” brought on politicians and newsmakers to be questioned by members of the press. The show’s format would evolve over the next 70 years, and give rise to fellow Sunday morning competitors including ABC’s “This Week,” CBS’s “Face the Nation” and “Fox News Sunday.” Since the mid-twentieth century, the overall media landscape significantly changed with the rise of cable news, social media and the consumption of online content.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesus in China—Evan Osnos on an Upcoming Frontline Documentary
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln The hinC a Beat Blog Archive 2008-2012 China Beat Archive 6-22-2008 Jesus in China—Evan Osnos on an Upcoming Frontline Documentary Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/chinabeatarchive Part of the Asian History Commons, Asian Studies Commons, Chinese Studies Commons, and the International Relations Commons "Jesus in China—Evan Osnos on an Upcoming Frontline Documentary" (2008). The China Beat Blog Archive 2008-2012. 205. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/chinabeatarchive/205 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the China Beat Archive at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in The hinC a Beat Blog Archive 2008-2012 by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Jesus in China—Evan Osnos on an Upcoming Frontline Documentary June 22, 2008 in Watching the China Watchers by The China Beat | No comments The Public Broadcasting Corporation’s Frontline series has a long tradition of airing documentaries on China. Carma Hinton and Richard Gordon’s prize-winning look at 1989, “The Gate of Heavenly Peace,” was shown as part of the series, for example, as was a later Tiananmen documentary, “The Tank Man.” And thanks to the online extras, from guides to further reading to lesson plans for teachers, the PBS Frontline site has become a valuable resource for those who offer classes or simply want to learn about the PRC. Still, it is rare (probably unprecedented) for two China shows to run back-to-back on Frontline.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq Index Tracking Variables of Reconstruction & Security in Post-Saddam Iraq
    Iraq Index Tracking Variables of Reconstruction & Security in Post-Saddam Iraq http://www.brookings.edu/iraqindex March 31, 2011 Foreign Policy at Brookings Tracks Security and Reconstruction in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan Afghanistan Index » http://www.brookings.edu/afghanistanindex Iraq Index » http://www.brookings.edu/iraqindex Pakistan Index » http://www.brookings.edu/pakistanindex Michael E. O’Hanlon Ian Livingston For more information please contact Ian Livingston at [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Tracking the Aftermath of the Surge Page Estimated Number of Iraqi Civilian Fatalities by Month, May 2003-Present…….…...…………………………..…….....….. UPDATED 3.31.11….……3 Detailed Explanation of Iraqi Civilian Fatality Estimates by Time Period……………. UPDATED 3.31.11…..…….……..……………………………….4 Enemy-Initiated Attacks Against the Coalition and Its Partners, by Week..…………..… …...……...……………………………………....…………….....5 Iraqi Military and Police Killed Monthly…………..……………………………….....… . UPDATED 3.31.11....………….……………….....………...……5 Weapons Caches Found and Cleared in Iraq, January 2004-Present……………………...………..……………………………………………………….....6 Number of Roadside and Car Bombs in Kirkuk, 2007-2010………………NEW 2.25.11….….………………………………………………………………6 Multiple Fatality Bombings in Iraq………………… . UPDATED 2.25.11…………....…...………..….……..…………………………………..………..…..7 Killed and Wounded in Multiple Fatality Bombings…….……………....... UPDATED 2.25.11.……...…...………..………..…………..….……..………...7 Number of Multiple Fatality Bombings Targeting Civilians by Sectarian Group and Month……
    [Show full text]
  • WHCA): Videotapes of Public Affairs, News, and Other Television Broadcasts, 1973-77
    Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library White House Communications Agency (WHCA): Videotapes of Public Affairs, News, and Other Television Broadcasts, 1973-77 WHCA selectively created, or acquired, videorecordings of news and public affairs broadcasts from the national networks CBS, NBC, and ABC; the public broadcast station WETA in Washington, DC; and various local station affiliates. Program examples include: news special reports, national presidential addresses and press conferences, local presidential events, guest interviews of administration officials, appearances of Ford family members, and the 1976 Republican Convention and Ford-Carter debates. In addition, WHCA created weekly compilation tapes of selected stories from network evening news programs. Click here for more details about the contents of the "Weekly News Summary" tapes All WHCA videorecordings are listed in the table below according to approximate original broadcast date. The last entries, however, are for compilation tapes of selected television appearances by Mrs. Ford, 1974-76. The tables are based on WHCA’s daily logs. “Tape Length” refers to the total recording time available, not actual broadcast duration. Copyright Notice: Although presidential addresses and very comparable public events are in the public domain, the broadcaster holds the rights to all of its own original content. This would include, for example, reporter commentaries and any supplemental information or images. Researchers may acquire copies of the videorecordings, but use of the copyrighted portions is restricted to private study and “fair use” in scholarship and research under copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code). Use the search capabilities of your PDF reader to locate specific names or keywords in the table below.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutual Watching and Resistance to Mass Surveillance After Snowden
    Media and Communication (ISSN: 2183-2439) 2015, Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 12-25 Doi: 10.17645/mac.v3i3.277 Article “Veillant Panoptic Assemblage”: Mutual Watching and Resistance to Mass Surveillance after Snowden Vian Bakir School of Creative Studies and Media, Bangor University, Bangor, LL57 2DG, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] Submitted: 9 April 2015 | In Revised Form: 16 July 2015 | Accepted: 4 August 2015 | Published: 20 October 2015 Abstract The Snowden leaks indicate the extent, nature, and means of contemporary mass digital surveillance of citizens by their intelligence agencies and the role of public oversight mechanisms in holding intelligence agencies to account. As such, they form a rich case study on the interactions of “veillance” (mutual watching) involving citizens, journalists, intelli- gence agencies and corporations. While Surveillance Studies, Intelligence Studies and Journalism Studies have little to say on surveillance of citizens’ data by intelligence agencies (and complicit surveillant corporations), they offer insights into the role of citizens and the press in holding power, and specifically the political-intelligence elite, to account. Atten- tion to such public oversight mechanisms facilitates critical interrogation of issues of surveillant power, resistance and intelligence accountability. It directs attention to the veillant panoptic assemblage (an arrangement of profoundly une- qual mutual watching, where citizens’ watching of self and others is, through corporate channels of data flow, fed back into state surveillance of citizens). Finally, it enables evaluation of post-Snowden steps taken towards achieving an equiveillant panoptic assemblage (where, alongside state and corporate surveillance of citizens, the intelligence-power elite, to ensure its accountability, faces robust scrutiny and action from wider civil society).
    [Show full text]
  • First Amended Complaint Exhibit 1 Donald J
    Case 2:17-cv-00141-JLR Document 18-1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 3 First Amended Complaint Exhibit 1 Donald J. Trump Statement on Preventing Muslim Immigration | Donald J Trump for Pre... Page 1 of 2 Case 2:17-cv-00141-JLR Document 18-1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 2 of 3 INSTAGRAM FACEBOOK TWITTER NEWS GET INVOLVED GALLERY ABOUT US SHOP CONTRIBUTE - DECEMBER 07, 2015 - CATEGORIES DONALD J. TRUMP STATEMENT ON VIEW ALL PREVENTING MUSLIM IMMIGRATION STATEMENTS (New York, NY) December 7th, 2015, -- Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's ANNOUNCEMENTS representatives can figure out what is going on. According to Pew Research, ENDORSEMENTS among others, there is great hatred towards Americans by large segments of the Muslim population. Most recently, a poll from the Center for Security ADS Policy released data showing "25% of those polled agreed that violence against Americans here in the United States is justified as a part of the global jihad" and 51% of those polled, "agreed that Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to Shariah." Shariah authorizes such atrocities as murder against non-believers who won't convert, beheadings and more unthinkable acts ARCHIVE that pose great harm to Americans, especially women. Mr. Trump stated, "Without looking at the various polling data, it is obvious to NOVEMBER 2016 anybody the hatred is beyond comprehension. Where this hatred comes from and OCTOBER 2016 why we will have to determine. Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of SEPTEMBER 2016 horrendous attacks by people that believe only in Jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life.
    [Show full text]
  • American Government (POL SC 1100) Spring 2019 Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, 2-2:50Pm 102 Naka Hall
    POL SC 1100-1-1-1-1 American Government (POL SC 1100) Spring 2019 Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, 2-2:50pm 102 Naka Hall Jake Haselswerdt, PhD Assistant Professor Department of Political Science & Truman School of Public Affairs Office: 301 Professional Building Office hours: Tuesday, 2-4pm, and by appointment Email (preferred): [email protected] Phone: 573-882-7873 Syllabus updated February 15, 2019 Teaching Assistants Hyojong Ahn Dongjin Kwak Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Office: 315 Professional Building Office: 207 Professional Building Office hours: Monday, 10:30am-1:30pm; Office hours: Monday & Wednesday, Tuesday, 12:30pm-3:30pm 10am-1pm Course Overview & Goals This course offers an introduction to American politics and government from a political science perspective. While the course should increase your factual civic knowledge of American institutions, it is about more than that. Political science seeks to move beyond civic knowledge, to question and analyze the people, groups, events, institutions, policies, ideas, etc that we observe. Sometimes, our questions are empirical, meaning they deal with what is: Do Members of Congress support the policies their constituents want? Do political campaigns affect voters’ decisions? Sometimes, they are normative, meaning they deal with what should be: Is the U.S. Senate harmful to democracy because Wyoming has the same number of senators as California? Should the Constitution be amended so Supreme Court Justices no longer serve for life? In this course, we will consider both types of questions. 1 POL SC 1100-1-1-1-1 The success of democratic governments depends in part on the capacity of their citizens to hold them accountable.
    [Show full text]
  • POLITICO, John Harris and Carrie Budoff Brown
    STATEMENTS FROM NEWS ORGS EXCLUDED – POLITICO, John Harris and Carrie Budoff Brown: “We’ve reached out to the White House, and rest assured that we plan to very vigorously assert and defend an independent media’s right to cover the institution of the Presidency. Selectively excluding news organizations from White House briefings is misguided and our expectation is that this action will not be repeated. We have one of the largest teams in Washington covering this White House—a major editorial and financial commitment on behalf of our audience. This commitment is an enduring one, and our coverage of the Trump Administration will of course continue without interruption.” --WASHPOST, Marty Baron: “It’s appalling that the White House would exclude news outlets like the New York Times, CNN, Politico, the Los Angeles Times, and BuzzFeed from its publicly announced briefings. This is an undemocratic path that the administration is traveling. There is nothing to be gained from the White House restricting the public’s access to information. We are currently evaluating what our response will be if this sort of thing happens again." – Marty Baron, Washington Post. --NYT, Dean Baquet: “Nothing like this has ever happened at the White House in our long history of covering multiple administrations of different parties. We strongly protest the exclusion of The New York Times and the other news organizations. Free media access to a transparent government is obviously of crucial national interest.” --BUZZFEED: “While we strongly object to the White House’s apparent attempt to punish news outlets whose coverage it does not like, we won’t let these latest antics distract us from continuing to cover this administration fairly and aggressively.” --CNN: “This is an unacceptable development by the Trump White House.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Under Drones Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan
    Fall 08 September 2012 Living Under Drones Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians From US Drone Practices in Pakistan International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic Stanford Law School Global Justice Clinic http://livingunderdrones.org/ NYU School of Law Cover Photo: Roof of the home of Faheem Qureshi, a then 14-year old victim of a January 23, 2009 drone strike (the first during President Obama’s administration), in Zeraki, North Waziristan, Pakistan. Photo supplied by Faheem Qureshi to our research team. Suggested Citation: INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION CLINIC (STANFORD LAW SCHOOL) AND GLOBAL JUSTICE CLINIC (NYU SCHOOL OF LAW), LIVING UNDER DRONES: DEATH, INJURY, AND TRAUMA TO CIVILIANS FROM US DRONE PRACTICES IN PAKISTAN (September, 2012) TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I ABOUT THE AUTHORS III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS V INTRODUCTION 1 METHODOLOGY 2 CHALLENGES 4 CHAPTER 1: BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT 7 DRONES: AN OVERVIEW 8 DRONES AND TARGETED KILLING AS A RESPONSE TO 9/11 10 PRESIDENT OBAMA’S ESCALATION OF THE DRONE PROGRAM 12 “PERSONALITY STRIKES” AND SO-CALLED “SIGNATURE STRIKES” 12 WHO MAKES THE CALL? 13 PAKISTAN’S DIVIDED ROLE 15 CONFLICT, ARMED NON-STATE GROUPS, AND MILITARY FORCES IN NORTHWEST PAKISTAN 17 UNDERSTANDING THE TARGET: FATA IN CONTEXT 20 PASHTUN CULTURE AND SOCIAL NORMS 22 GOVERNANCE 23 ECONOMY AND HOUSEHOLDS 25 ACCESSING FATA 26 CHAPTER 2: NUMBERS 29 TERMINOLOGY 30 UNDERREPORTING OF CIVILIAN CASUALTIES BY US GOVERNMENT SOURCES 32 CONFLICTING MEDIA REPORTS 35 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Sources for Evil Geniuses: the Unmaking of America: a Recent History
    Notes and Sources for Evil Geniuses: The Unmaking of America: A Recent History Introduction xiv “If infectious greed is the virus” Kurt Andersen, “City of Schemes,” The New York Times, Oct. 6, 2002. xvi “run of pedal-to-the-medal hypercapitalism” Kurt Andersen, “American Roulette,” New York, December 22, 2006. xx “People of the same trade” Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, ed. Andrew Skinner, 1776 (London: Penguin, 1999) Book I, Chapter X. Chapter 1 4 “The discovery of America offered” Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy In America, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (New York: Library of America, 2012), Book One, Introductory Chapter. 4 “A new science of politics” Tocqueville, Democracy In America, Book One, Introductory Chapter. 4 “The inhabitants of the United States” Tocqueville, Democracy In America, Book One, Chapter XVIII. 5 “there was virtually no economic growth” Robert J Gordon. “Is US economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six headwinds.” Policy Insight No. 63. Centre for Economic Policy Research, September, 2012. --Thomas Piketty, “World Growth from the Antiquity (growth rate per period),” Quandl. 6 each citizen’s share of the economy Richard H. Steckel, “A History of the Standard of Living in the United States,” in EH.net (Economic History Association, 2020). --Andrew McAfee and Erik Brynjolfsson, The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (New York: W.W. Norton, 2016), p. 98. 6 “Constant revolutionizing of production” Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx, Manifesto of the Communist Party (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1969), Chapter I. 7 from the early 1840s to 1860 Tomas Nonnenmacher, “History of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pulitzer Prizes 2020 Winne
    WINNERS AND FINALISTS 1917 TO PRESENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Excerpts from the Plan of Award ..............................................................2 PULITZER PRIZES IN JOURNALISM Public Service ...........................................................................................6 Reporting ...............................................................................................24 Local Reporting .....................................................................................27 Local Reporting, Edition Time ..............................................................32 Local General or Spot News Reporting ..................................................33 General News Reporting ........................................................................36 Spot News Reporting ............................................................................38 Breaking News Reporting .....................................................................39 Local Reporting, No Edition Time .......................................................45 Local Investigative or Specialized Reporting .........................................47 Investigative Reporting ..........................................................................50 Explanatory Journalism .........................................................................61 Explanatory Reporting ...........................................................................64 Specialized Reporting .............................................................................70
    [Show full text]
  • Signature Redacted Certified By: William Fjricchio Professor of Compa Ive Media Studies Thesis Supervisor Signature Redacted Accepted By
    Manufacturing Dissent: Assessing the Methods and Impact of RT (Russia Today) by Matthew G. Graydon B.A. Film University of California, Berkeley, 2008 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMPARATIVE MEDIA STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN COMPARATIVE MEDIA STUDIES AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUNE 2019 C2019 Matthew G. Graydon. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. S~ri' t A Signature red acted Department of Comparative 6/ledia Studies May 10, 2019 _____Signature redacted Certified by: William fJricchio Professor of Compa ive Media Studies Thesis Supervisor Signature redacted Accepted by: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE Professor of Comparative Media Studies _OF TECHNOLOGY Director of Graduate Studies JUN 1 12019 LIBRARIES ARCHIVES I I Manufacturing Dissent: Assessing the Methods and Impact of RT (Russia Today) by Matthew G. Graydon Submitted to the Department of Comparative Media Studies on May 10, 2019 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Comparative Media Studies ABSTRACT The state-sponsored news network RT (formerly Russia Today) was launched in 2005 as a platform for improving Russia's global image. Fourteen years later, RT has become a self- described tool for information warfare and is under increasing scrutiny from the United States government for allegedly fomenting unrest and undermining democracy. It has also grown far beyond its television roots, achieving a broad diffusion across a variety of digital platforms.
    [Show full text]