CLOCK Is a Substrate of SUMO and Sumoylation of CLOCK Upregulates the Transcriptional Activity of Estrogen Receptor-A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CLOCK Is a Substrate of SUMO and Sumoylation of CLOCK Upregulates the Transcriptional Activity of Estrogen Receptor-A Oncogene (2013) 32, 4883–4891 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/13 www.nature.com/onc ORIGINAL ARTICLE CLOCK is a substrate of SUMO and sumoylation of CLOCK upregulates the transcriptional activity of estrogen receptor-a S Li, M Wang, X Ao, AK Chang, C Yang, F Zhao, H Bi, Y Liu, L Xiao and H Wu Disruption of the circadian rhythm is now believed to associate with a number of hormone-related cancers, such as breast cancer, in which aberrant estrogen receptor-a (ERa) signaling is a major contributor. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the function of core clock proteins in cancer are still largely undefined. In this study, we showed that circadian locomotor output cycles kaput (CLOCK), a key circadian protein, can interact with ERa. Furthermore, this interaction was enhanced by estrogen. We also showed that CLOCK can be sumoylated and sumoylation of CLOCK, which is also stimulated by estrogen, had two consequences: (1) it increased the transcriptional activity of CLOCK; and (2) it increased the CLOCK-modulated transcriptional activity of ERa, as shown by increased transcription of cyclin D1. Sumoylation of CLOCK occurred at two lysine residues, K67 and K851. The enhancement of ERa transcriptional activity exerted by wild-type but not mutant (2K/2R) CLOCK in response to estrogen indicated that sumoylation of CLOCK may have an important role in estrogen-dependent signaling. 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5- diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay conducted with breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and T47D) demonstrated that sumoylation of CLOCK stimulated cell growth and increased the proportion of S phase cells in the cell cycle. The results of this study uncovered new insight into the connection between a major circadian protein and a major estrogen-dependent transcription factor, providing the basis for further research into the involvement of circadian proteins in breast cancer. Oncogene (2013) 32, 4883–4891; doi:10.1038/onc.2012.518; published online 19 November 2012 Keywords: CLOCK; ERa; estrogen; sumoylation INTRODUCTION increased incidence of hormone-related breast cancer as well as 15,16 The steroid hormone estrogen (E2) is essential for normal other types of malignancies. In addition to epidemiological mammary gland physiology, and a potent mammary mitogen.1,2 studies showing a clear connection between disruption of The main mechanism by which E2 regulates gene transcription is circadian rhythms and breast cancers, numerous studies have through binding with estrogen receptors (ERs), which then form a also reported that the expression levels of the period (Per1 and dimer and bind to estrogen-responsive elements (EREs) in the Per2) genes in both sporadic and familial primary breast tumor regulatory regions of downstream target genes and associate with tissues are significantly lower compared with the levels in normal 17–19 basal transcription factors, coactivators or corepressors to regulate breast tissues. the expressions of these genes.2–4 There are two isoforms of ERs, Most physiological processes in mammals are influenced by ERa and ERb, and both are known to modulate the expressions of circadian rhythms. The mechanism of circadian oscillation is genes that are implicated in different cellular processes, including generated by a cell autoregulatory transcription–translation feed- tumorigenesis.5,6 Much investigation has focused on under- back loop. At the molecular levels, circadian rhythm is composed standing the role of ERa in the development and progression of of a set of interlocked clock proteins in which circadian locomotor breast cancer, and it has been shown that aberrant ERa signaling output cycles kaput (CLOCK) and brain and muscle ARNT-like is closely related to the occurrence of ERa-positive breast cancer.7 protein 1 (BMAL1) are the core circadian proteins. CLOCK and ERa has been shown to interact with several coactivators having BMAL1 can associate with each other to form heterodimer, which histone acetyltransferase activity, including cAMP-response element then bind to E-box elements in the promoters of target genes to binding protein (CREB)-binding protein, p300, and members of the induce the rhythmical transcription of period (Per1, 2 and 3) and p160 family, such as steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1), SRC-2 cryptochrome (Cry1 and 2) in the positive limb.20–22 CLOCK has an and SRC-3.8,9 The transcriptional activities of all members of the intrinsic histone acetyltransferase activity, so it can initiate p160 family are regulated by their post-translational modifications, chromatin remodeling and create a favorable state for transcrip- such as phosphorylation and sumoylation.10–13 tion.23 The transcripts of Per and Cry genes are then translated into The secretions of endocrine and metabolic hormones occur in their corresponding proteins, PERs and CRYs, in the cytoplasm. a rhythmical manner. Reciprocally circulating levels of these PERs and CRYs form heterodimers and are subsequently trans- hormones influence the circadian rhythms. Disruption of this ported into the nucleus where they can function as potent communication has a profound effect on human health and has inhibitors of CLOCK–BMAL1-driven transcription.24–26 To start a been linked to diverse pathological conditions, including hormone- new cycle, the inhibition of CLOCK–BMAL1 heterodimer has to be related breast and endometrial cancers.14,15 A remarkable released by the proteolytic degradation of PER and CRY.25,26 example is that overnight-shift workers tend to have an Further regulation is achieved by post-translational modification School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China. Correspondence: Professor H Wu, School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Dalian University of Technology, 2 Ling Gong Road, Dalian 116024, China. E-mail: [email protected] Received 9 May 2012; revised 6 September 2012; accepted 28 September 2012; published online 19 November 2012 Sumoylation in CLOCK regulates ERa’s activity SLiet al 4884 and chromatin remodeling, which are pivotal to maintaining the compared with control. Overexpression of ERa alone without and circadian rhythms. with E2 treatment increased ERE-luc activity (Figure 1e). However, At present, few studies have focused on the post-translational overexpression of both ERa and CLOCK resulted in a further modification of CLOCK other than its phosphorylation by protein twofold increase of ERE-luc activity in the presence of E2 kinase C and glycogen synthase kinase-3.27,28 Small ubiquitin treatment. This response was consistent with CLOCK-stimulated like-modifier (SUMO) modification is an important mechanism ERa transcriptional activity in response to E2 treatment. Similarly, for dynamical post-translation regulation of protein functions.29 overexpression of ERa and SRC-1, which is a classical coactivator To our knowledge, there has been no report concerning the for ERa, also increased the level of ERE-luc activity, and repeated sumoylation of circadian proteins, except for BMAL1 and here as a positive control (Figure 1e). Knockdown of CLOCK differentiated embryo-chondrocyte expressed gene1 (DEC1).30,31 expression in MCF-7 cells using the specific small interfering RNA, Both BMAL1 and members of the p160 family transcription siCLOCK-2467, suppressed ERa-mediated transcriptional activity coactivator, which have similar structure with CLOCK, have all while another specific small interfering RNA, siCLOCK-1357, been shown to be sumoylated, so we speculated that CLOCK may showed almost no effect on the transcriptional activity of ERa. also be subjected to sumoylation. This was further confirmed by western blot analysis, which Although a growing number of studies have suggested that showed that siCLOCK-2467 effectively repressed the expression of disruption of the circadian rhythm is associated with breast CLOCK protein, whereas siCLOCK-1375 had no effect on its tumorigenesis, very few studies have investigated the direct expression (Figure 1f). The ability of CLOCK to regulate the involvement of circadian proteins in the estrogen signaling expression of the well-established ERa-targeted gene, cyclin D1, pathway. PER2 expression is now known to be induced by was also examined. Knockdown of CLOCK by siCLOCK-2467 estrogen, and PER2 can bind to ERa and enhance its degradation, decreased the activity of cyclin D1 reporter and expression level of linking the circadian rhythm to ERa signaling pathway.14 CLOCK cyclin D1 (Figures 1g and h). The data from these experiments shares a number of structural features with p160 family proteins, provided support for the upregulation of ERa transcriptional which are classical coactivators of ERa, including a highly activity by CLOCK in the presence of estrogen. conserved basic helix-loop-helix/Per-Arnt-Sim (bHLH/PAS) domain, nuclear receptor interaction domain and a glutamine- CLOCK is modified by SUMO-1 rich C-terminal domain that possesses histone acetyltransferase Previous research has shown that ERa interacts with several activity.23 Based on the structural similarity between CLOCK and cofactors, such as members of the p160 family, and all known p160 family proteins, we proposed that CLOCK could well be a members of p160 family are subjected to sumoylation.10–12 As potential cofactor of ERa. CLOCK has a similar structure with members of the p160 family, In this study, we showed that CLOCK can associate with ERa to we wished to know whether CLOCK is also a target of sumoylation. enhance the transcriptional activity of ERa, and this was promoted As shown in Figure 2a, immunoprecipitated CLOCK from MCF-7 by E2. We also showed that CLOCK could be sumoylated and cells was detected by anti-SUMO-1 antibody. The size of this band identified two sumoylation sites. Sumoylation of CLOCK enhanced corresponded to that of SUMO-conjugated CLOCK, and its its transcriptional activity and interaction with ERa, resulting in intensity increased with increasing E2 treatment time, although upregulation of ERa activity. Our data have given new insight into the total amount of CLOCK protein remained relatively the involvement of CLOCK in estrogen signaling pathway, with unchanged.
Recommended publications
  • Hedgehog Signaling Is Evolutionarily Conserved Cilium-Independent
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on August 14, 2009 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Cilium-independent regulation of Gli protein function by Sufu in Hedgehog signaling is evolutionarily conserved Miao-Hsueh Chen, Christopher W. Wilson, Ya-Jun Li, et al. Genes Dev. 2009 23: 1910-1928 Access the most recent version at doi:10.1101/gad.1794109 Supplemental http://genesdev.cshlp.org/content/suppl/2009/07/23/23.16.1910.DC1.html Material References This article cites 97 articles, 47 of which can be accessed free at: http://genesdev.cshlp.org/content/23/16/1910.full.html#ref-list-1 Email alerting Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the box at the service top right corner of the article or click here To subscribe to Genes & Development go to: http://genesdev.cshlp.org/subscriptions Copyright © 2009 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on August 14, 2009 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Cilium-independent regulation of Gli protein function by Sufu in Hedgehog signaling is evolutionarily conserved Miao-Hsueh Chen,1,3 Christopher W. Wilson,1,3 Ya-Jun Li,1 Kelvin King Lo Law,2 Chi-Sheng Lu,1 Rhodora Gacayan,1 Xiaoyun Zhang,2 Chi-chung Hui,2 and Pao-Tien Chuang1,4 1Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158, USA; 2Program in Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, Canada A central question in Hedgehog (Hh) signaling is how evolutionarily conserved components of the pathway might use the primary cilium in mammals but not fly.
    [Show full text]
  • Gli Transcription Factors Mediate the Oncogenic Transformation of Prostate Basal Cells Induced by a Kras-Androgen Receptor Axis*
    crossmark THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY VOL. 291, NO. 49, pp. 25749–25760, December 2, 2016 © 2016 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. Published in the U.S.A. Gli Transcription Factors Mediate the Oncogenic Transformation of Prostate Basal Cells Induced by a Kras-Androgen Receptor Axis*□S Received for publication, August 12, 2016, and in revised form, September 28, 2016 Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 19, 2016, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M116.753129 Meng Wu‡, Lishann Ingram‡, Ezequiel J. Tolosa§, Renzo E. Vera§, Qianjin Li‡, Sungjin Kim‡, Yongjie Ma‡, Demetri D. Spyropoulos¶, Zanna Beharryʈ, Jiaoti Huang**, Martin E. Fernandez-Zapico§, and Houjian Cai‡1 From the ‡Department of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, the §Schulze Center for Novel Therapeutics, Division of Oncology Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, the ¶Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425, the ʈDepartment of Chemistry and Physics, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, Florida 33965, and the **Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710 Edited by Eric Fearon Although the differentiation of oncogenically transformed cer progression has been characterized with multiple stages, 2 basal progenitor cells is one of the key steps in prostate tumori- including benign, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), Downloaded from genesis, the mechanisms mediating this cellular process are still invasive adenocarcinoma, and metastatic cancer (2). Numerous ؉ largely unknown. Here we demonstrate that an expanded p63 oncogenic driver genes, including loss of tumor suppressors, ؉ and CK5 basal/progenitor cell population, induced by the con- overexpression, and/or activation of oncogenes, have been comitant activation of oncogenic Kras(G12D) and androgen identified based on genetic analysis of clinical prostate tumors.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of Interacting Transcription Factors in Human Tissues Using
    Myšičková and Vingron BMC Genomics 2012, 13(Suppl 1):S2 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/13/S1/S2 PROCEEDINGS Open Access Detection of interacting transcription factors in human tissues using predicted DNA binding affinity Alena Myšičková*, Martin Vingron From The Tenth Asia Pacific Bioinformatics Conference (APBC 2012) Melbourne, Australia. 17-19 January 2012 Abstract Background: Tissue-specific gene expression is generally regulated by combinatorial interactions among transcription factors (TFs) which bind to the DNA. Despite this known fact, previous discoveries of the mechanism that controls gene expression usually consider only a single TF. Results: We provide a prediction of interacting TFs in 22 human tissues based on their DNA-binding affinity in promoter regions. We analyze all possible pairs of 130 vertebrate TFs from the JASPAR database. First, all human promoter regions are scanned for single TF-DNA binding affinities with TRAP and for each TF a ranked list of all promoters ordered by the binding affinity is created. We then study the similarity of the ranked lists and detect candidates for TF-TF interaction by applying a partial independence test for multiway contingency tables. Our candidates are validated by both known protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and known gene regulation mechanisms in the selected tissue. We find that the known PPIs are significantly enriched in the groups of our predicted TF-TF interactions (2 and 7 times more common than expected by chance). In addition, the predicted interacting TFs for studied tissues (liver, muscle, hematopoietic stem cell) are supported in literature to be active regulators or to be expressed in the corresponding tissue.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Canonical Activation of Hedgehog in Prostate Cancer Cells Mediated by the Interaction of Transcriptionally Active Androgen Receptor Proteins with Gli3
    Oncogene (2018) 37:2313–2325 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-017-0098-7 ARTICLE Non-canonical activation of hedgehog in prostate cancer cells mediated by the interaction of transcriptionally active androgen receptor proteins with Gli3 1 1,2 2 1 1 1 2,3 Na Li ● Sarah Truong ● Mannan Nouri ● Jackson Moore ● Nader Al Nakouzi ● Amy Anne Lubik ● Ralph Buttyan Received: 19 July 2017 / Revised: 18 October 2017 / Accepted: 29 November 2017 / Published online: 12 February 2018 © The Author(s) 2018. This article is published with open access Abstract Hedgehog (Hh) is an oncogenic signaling pathway that regulates the activity of Gli transcription factors. Canonical Hh is a Smoothened-(Smo-) driven process that alters the post-translational processing of Gli2/Gli3 proteins. Though evidence supports a role for Gli action in prostate cancer (PCa) cell growth and progression, there is little indication that Smo is involved. Here we describe a non-canonical means for activation of Gli transcription in PCa cells mediated by the binding of transcriptionally-active androgen receptors (ARs) to Gli3. Androgens stimulated reporter expression from a Gli-dependent promoter in a variety of AR + PCa cells and this activity was suppressed by an anti-androgen, Enz, or by AR knockdown. 1234567890();,: Androgens also upregulated expression of endogenous Gli-dependent genes. This activity was associated with increased intranuclear binding of Gli3 to AR that was antagonized by Enz. Fine mapping of the AR binding domain on Gli2 showed that AR recognizes the Gli protein processing domain (PPD) in the C-terminus. Mutations in the arginine-/serine repeat elements of the Gli2 PPD involved in phosphorylation and ubiquitinylation blocked the binding to AR.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Analysis of KRAS Mutant Cell Lines Ben Yi Tew1,5, Joel K
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of KRAS mutant cell lines Ben Yi Tew1,5, Joel K. Durand2,5, Kirsten L. Bryant2, Tikvah K. Hayes2, Sen Peng3, Nhan L. Tran4, Gerald C. Gooden1, David N. Buckley1, Channing J. Der2, Albert S. Baldwin2 ✉ & Bodour Salhia1 ✉ Oncogenic RAS mutations are associated with DNA methylation changes that alter gene expression to drive cancer. Recent studies suggest that DNA methylation changes may be stochastic in nature, while other groups propose distinct signaling pathways responsible for aberrant methylation. Better understanding of DNA methylation events associated with oncogenic KRAS expression could enhance therapeutic approaches. Here we analyzed the basal CpG methylation of 11 KRAS-mutant and dependent pancreatic cancer cell lines and observed strikingly similar methylation patterns. KRAS knockdown resulted in unique methylation changes with limited overlap between each cell line. In KRAS-mutant Pa16C pancreatic cancer cells, while KRAS knockdown resulted in over 8,000 diferentially methylated (DM) CpGs, treatment with the ERK1/2-selective inhibitor SCH772984 showed less than 40 DM CpGs, suggesting that ERK is not a broadly active driver of KRAS-associated DNA methylation. KRAS G12V overexpression in an isogenic lung model reveals >50,600 DM CpGs compared to non-transformed controls. In lung and pancreatic cells, gene ontology analyses of DM promoters show an enrichment for genes involved in diferentiation and development. Taken all together, KRAS-mediated DNA methylation are stochastic and independent of canonical downstream efector signaling. These epigenetically altered genes associated with KRAS expression could represent potential therapeutic targets in KRAS-driven cancer. Activating KRAS mutations can be found in nearly 25 percent of all cancers1.
    [Show full text]
  • Play Clock Operator Guide
    NFHS GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR FOOTBALL GAME AND PLAY CLOCK OPERATORS A. The game and play clock operators should report to the game officials at the stadium at least 30 minutes before game time for the following purposes: 1. To synchronize timer’s watch with official game time as established by the game official responsible for timing. 2. To advise game officials whether the game clock operator and/or play clock operator will be in the press box or on the field/side- line. Determine procedure for communications with both operators and test procedures prior to the games. 3. To discuss coordination of starting, stopping and adjusting the game clock or play clock in accordance with the playing rules. 4. To discuss if the game clock horn (mechanical signal) can be turned off. Preference is for the game clock horn (mechanical signal) to be turned off for the duration of the game. B. The game clock is normally started 30 minutes before game time. The halftime intermission will start on the referee’s signal when the players and game officials leave the field. All pregame and halftime activities shall be synchronized with the game clock. The mandatory three-minute warm-up period will be put on the game clock after the intermission time has elapsed and shall be started immediately. C. The game clock operator shall have an extra stopwatch available. In case of failure of the game clock, the game clock operator shall immediately contact the game officials, giving them the correct data regarding the official time. The game official responsible for timing will then pick up the correct game time on the stopwatch.
    [Show full text]
  • Agonists and Knockdown of Estrogen Receptor Β Differentially Affect
    Schüler-Toprak et al. BMC Cancer (2016) 16:951 DOI 10.1186/s12885-016-2973-y RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Agonists and knockdown of estrogen receptor β differentially affect invasion of triple-negative breast cancer cells in vitro Susanne Schüler-Toprak1*, Julia Häring1, Elisabeth C. Inwald1, Christoph Moehle2, Olaf Ortmann1 and Oliver Treeck1 Abstract Background: Estrogen receptor β (ERβ) is expressed in the majority of invasive breast cancer cases, irrespective of their subtype, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Thus, ERβ might be a potential target for therapy of this challenging cancer type. In this in vitro study, we examined the role of ERβ in invasion of two triple-negative breast cancer cell lines. Methods: MDA-MB-231 and HS578T breast cancer cells were treated with the specific ERβ agonists ERB-041, WAY200070, Liquiritigenin and 3β-Adiol. Knockdown of ERβ expression was performed by means of siRNA transfection. Effects on cellular invasion were assessed in vitro by means of a modified Boyden chamber assay. Transcriptome analyses were performed using Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0 ST microarrays. Pathway and gene network analyses were performed by means of Genomatix and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software. Results: Invasiveness of MBA-MB-231 and HS578T breast cancer cells decreased after treatment with ERβ agonists ERB-041 and WAY200070. Agonists Liquiritigenin and 3β-Adiol only reduced invasion of MDA-MB-231 cells. Knockdown of ERβ expression increased invasiveness of MDA-MB-231 cells about 3-fold. Transcriptome and pathway analyses revealed that ERβ knockdown led to activation of TGFβ signalling and induced expression of a network of genes with functions in extracellular matrix, tumor cell invasion and vitamin D3 metabolism.
    [Show full text]
  • Tamoxifen Resistance: Emerging Molecular Targets
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Tamoxifen Resistance: Emerging Molecular Targets Milena Rondón-Lagos 1,*,†, Victoria E. Villegas 2,3,*,†, Nelson Rangel 1,2,3, Magda Carolina Sánchez 2 and Peter G. Zaphiropoulos 4 1 Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá 11001000, Colombia; [email protected] 3 Doctoral Program in Biomedical Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá 11001000, Colombia 4 Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge 14183, Sweden; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.R.-L.); [email protected] (V.E.V.); Tel.: +39-01-1633-4127 (ext. 4388) (M.R.-L.); +57-1-297-0200 (ext. 4029) (V.E.V.); Fax: +39-01-1663-5267 (M.R.-L.); +57-1-297-0200 (V.E.V.) † These authors contributed equally to this work. Academic Editor: William Chi-shing Cho Received: 5 July 2016; Accepted: 16 August 2016; Published: 19 August 2016 Abstract: 17β-Estradiol (E2) plays a pivotal role in the development and progression of breast cancer. As a result, blockade of the E2 signal through either tamoxifen (TAM) or aromatase inhibitors is an important therapeutic strategy to treat or prevent estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer. However, resistance to TAM is the major obstacle in endocrine therapy. This resistance occurs either de novo or is acquired after an initial beneficial response. The underlying mechanisms for TAM resistance are probably multifactorial and remain largely unknown. Considering that breast cancer is a very heterogeneous disease and patients respond differently to treatment, the molecular analysis of TAM’s biological activity could provide the necessary framework to understand the complex effects of this drug in target cells.
    [Show full text]
  • 1714 Gene Comprehensive Cancer Panel Enriched for Clinically Actionable Genes with Additional Biologically Relevant Genes 400-500X Average Coverage on Tumor
    xO GENE PANEL 1714 gene comprehensive cancer panel enriched for clinically actionable genes with additional biologically relevant genes 400-500x average coverage on tumor Genes A-C Genes D-F Genes G-I Genes J-L AATK ATAD2B BTG1 CDH7 CREM DACH1 EPHA1 FES G6PC3 HGF IL18RAP JADE1 LMO1 ABCA1 ATF1 BTG2 CDK1 CRHR1 DACH2 EPHA2 FEV G6PD HIF1A IL1R1 JAK1 LMO2 ABCB1 ATM BTG3 CDK10 CRK DAXX EPHA3 FGF1 GAB1 HIF1AN IL1R2 JAK2 LMO7 ABCB11 ATR BTK CDK11A CRKL DBH EPHA4 FGF10 GAB2 HIST1H1E IL1RAP JAK3 LMTK2 ABCB4 ATRX BTRC CDK11B CRLF2 DCC EPHA5 FGF11 GABPA HIST1H3B IL20RA JARID2 LMTK3 ABCC1 AURKA BUB1 CDK12 CRTC1 DCUN1D1 EPHA6 FGF12 GALNT12 HIST1H4E IL20RB JAZF1 LPHN2 ABCC2 AURKB BUB1B CDK13 CRTC2 DCUN1D2 EPHA7 FGF13 GATA1 HLA-A IL21R JMJD1C LPHN3 ABCG1 AURKC BUB3 CDK14 CRTC3 DDB2 EPHA8 FGF14 GATA2 HLA-B IL22RA1 JMJD4 LPP ABCG2 AXIN1 C11orf30 CDK15 CSF1 DDIT3 EPHB1 FGF16 GATA3 HLF IL22RA2 JMJD6 LRP1B ABI1 AXIN2 CACNA1C CDK16 CSF1R DDR1 EPHB2 FGF17 GATA5 HLTF IL23R JMJD7 LRP5 ABL1 AXL CACNA1S CDK17 CSF2RA DDR2 EPHB3 FGF18 GATA6 HMGA1 IL2RA JMJD8 LRP6 ABL2 B2M CACNB2 CDK18 CSF2RB DDX3X EPHB4 FGF19 GDNF HMGA2 IL2RB JUN LRRK2 ACE BABAM1 CADM2 CDK19 CSF3R DDX5 EPHB6 FGF2 GFI1 HMGCR IL2RG JUNB LSM1 ACSL6 BACH1 CALR CDK2 CSK DDX6 EPOR FGF20 GFI1B HNF1A IL3 JUND LTK ACTA2 BACH2 CAMTA1 CDK20 CSNK1D DEK ERBB2 FGF21 GFRA4 HNF1B IL3RA JUP LYL1 ACTC1 BAG4 CAPRIN2 CDK3 CSNK1E DHFR ERBB3 FGF22 GGCX HNRNPA3 IL4R KAT2A LYN ACVR1 BAI3 CARD10 CDK4 CTCF DHH ERBB4 FGF23 GHR HOXA10 IL5RA KAT2B LZTR1 ACVR1B BAP1 CARD11 CDK5 CTCFL DIAPH1 ERCC1 FGF3 GID4 HOXA11 IL6R KAT5 ACVR2A
    [Show full text]
  • Neurobiological Functions of the Period Circadian Clock 2 Gene, Per2
    Review Biomol Ther 26(4), 358-367 (2018) Neurobiological Functions of the Period Circadian Clock 2 Gene, Per2 Mikyung Kim, June Bryan de la Peña, Jae Hoon Cheong and Hee Jin Kim* Department of Pharmacy, Uimyung Research Institute for Neuroscience, Sahmyook University, Seoul 01795, Republic of Korea Abstract Most organisms have adapted to a circadian rhythm that follows a roughly 24-hour cycle, which is modulated by both internal (clock-related genes) and external (environment) factors. In such organisms, the central nervous system (CNS) is influenced by the circadian rhythm of individual cells. Furthermore, the period circadian clock 2 (Per2) gene is an important component of the circadian clock, which modulates the circadian rhythm. Per2 is mainly expressed in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus as well as other brain areas, including the midbrain and forebrain. This indicates that Per2 may affect various neurobiological activities such as sleeping, depression, and addiction. In this review, we focus on the neurobiological functions of Per2, which could help to better understand its roles in the CNS. Key Words: Circadian rhythm, Per2 gene, Sleep, Depression, Addiction, Neurotransmitter INTRODUCTION and lives in organisms because it can impart effects from the level of cells to organs including the brain. Thus, it is neces- A circadian rhythm is any physiological process that displays sary to understand clock-related genes that are controlling the a roughly 24 hour cycle in living beings, such as mammals, circadian rhythm endogenously. plants, fungi and cyanobacteria (Albrecht, 2012). In organ- The Period2 (Per2) gene is a member of the Period family isms, most biological functions such as sleeping and feeding of genes consisting of Per1, Per2, and Per3, and is mainly patterns are adapted to the circadian rhythm.
    [Show full text]
  • Immunohistochemistry Stain Offerings
    immunohistochemistry stain offerings TRUSTED PATHOLOGISTS. INVALUABLE ANSWERS.™ MARCHMAY 20172021 www.aruplab.com/ap-ihcaruplab.com/ap-ihc InformationInformation in this brochurein this brochure is current is current as of as May of March 2021. 2017. All content All content is subject is subject to tochange. change. Please contactPlease ARUPcontact ClientARUP Services Client Services at 800-522-2787 at (800) 522-2787 with any with questions any questions or concerns.or concerns. ARUP LABORATORIES As a nonprofit, academic institution of the University of Utah and its Department We believe in of Pathology, ARUP believes in collaborating, sharing and contributing to laboratory science in ways that benefit our clients and their patients. collaborating, Our test menu is one of the broadest in the industry, encompassing more sharing and than 3,000 tests, including highly specialized and esoteric assays. We offer comprehensive testing in the areas of genetics, molecular oncology, pediatrics, contributing pain management, and more. to laboratory ARUP’s clients include many of the nation’s university teaching hospitals and children’s hospitals, as well as multihospital groups, major commercial science in ways laboratories, and group purchasing organizations. We believe that healthcare should be delivered as close to the patient as possible, which is why we support that provide our clients’ efforts to be the principal healthcare provider in the communities they serve by offering highly complex assays and accompanying consultative support. the best value Offering analytics, consulting, and decision support services, ARUP provides for the patient. clients with the utilization management tools necessary to prosper in this time of value-based care.
    [Show full text]
  • GLI2 but Not GLI1/GLI3 Plays a Central Role in the Induction of Malignant Phenotype of Gallbladder Cancer
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS 45: 997-1010, 2021 GLI2 but not GLI1/GLI3 plays a central role in the induction of malignant phenotype of gallbladder cancer SHU ICHIMIYA1, HIDEYA ONISHI1, SHINJIRO NAGAO1, SATOKO KOGA1, KUKIKO SAKIHAMA2, KAZUNORI NAKAYAMA1, AKIKO FUJIMURA3, YASUHIRO OYAMA4, AKIRA IMAIZUMI1, YOSHINAO ODA2 and MASAFUMI NAKAMURA4 Departments of 1Cancer Therapy and Research, 2Anatomical Pathology, 3Otorhinolaryngology and 4Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812‑8582, Japan Received August 10, 2020; Accepted December 7, 2020 DOI: 10.3892/or.2021.7947 Abstract. We previously reported that Hedgehog (Hh) signal Introduction was enhanced in gallbladder cancer (GBC) and was involved in the induction of malignant phenotype of GBC. In recent Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the seventh most common gastro- years, therapeutics that target Hh signaling have focused on intestinal carcinoma and accounts for 1.2% of all cancer cases molecules downstream of smoothened (SMO). The three tran- and 1.7% of all cancer-related deaths (1). GBC develops from scription factors in the Hh signal pathway, glioma-associated metaplasia to dysplasia to carcinoma in situ and then to invasive oncogene homolog 1 (GLI1), GLI2, and GLI3, function down- carcinoma over 5‑15 years (2). During this time, GBC exhibits stream of SMO, but their biological role in GBC remains few characteristic symptoms, and numerous cases have already unclear. In the present study, the biological significance of developed into locally advanced or metastasized cancer by the GLI1, GLI2, and GLI3 were analyzed with the aim of devel- time of diagnosis. Gemcitabine (GEM), cisplatin (CDDP), and oping novel treatments for GBC.
    [Show full text]