Goblets, Talboys and Such Other Bacchic Artillery.''''

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Goblets, Talboys and Such Other Bacchic Artillery.'''' Durham E-Theses Tudor and early Stuart vessel glass: an archaeological study of forms and patterns of consumption in England, 1500 to 1640 Willmott, Hugh Benedict How to cite: Willmott, Hugh Benedict (1999) Tudor and early Stuart vessel glass: an archaeological study of forms and patterns of consumption in England, 1500 to 1640, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4291/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Tudor and Early Stuart Vessel Glass; an archaeological study of forms and patterns of consumption in England, 1500 to 1640. Hugh Benedict Willmott The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should he published in any form, including Electronic and the Internet, without the author's prior written consent. All information derived from this thesis must be acknowledged appropriately. Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Archaeology University of Durham December 1999 1 9 JUN 2001 Statement of Copyright The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. © Hugh Willmott 1999. All Rights Reserved. Abstract Tudor and Early Stuart Vessel Glass; an archaeological study of forms and patterns of consumption in England, 1500 to 1640. Hugh Benedict Willmott Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Archaeology University of Durham December 1999 The aims of this thesis are twofold. The first is concerned with the establishment of a typology for vessel glass in England between 1500 and 1640. There has been no morphological classification for glass of this period and one is constructed in this thesis from museum collections, published and unpublished material derived from archaeological excavations. The second aim of this thesis is to explore the way that glass vessels were used in Tudor and early Stuart society. The rise of consumerism and role of consumption in early modern Europe has been explored by a number of scholars, but there has been little attempt to link these ideas with excavated material culture. To achieve these aims twelve groups of glass from a variety of well contexted sites have been examined. The glass from these, in conjunction with seventy-four published excavation reports, forms the basis for the vessel classification. Although classified primarily by their form the typology considers questions concerning the manufacturing provenance and the decorative techniques used on the vessels. Likewise the twelve study sites are used as the basis for a more contextualised material culture study. Differences between assemblages from urban and elite sites are considered, as are their relative forms of disposal. Further questions concerning the role of glass during dining and the importance of vessel decoration as a means of conveying social messages are addressed. Finally contrasting patterns of repair and conspicuous consumption are considered. Whilst providing a framework for future research into the glass used in Tudor and early Stuart England, this thesis advocates a new methodological approach for material culture studies. It has demonstrated that through a more contextualised study of artefacts, a greater understanding of material culture use can be achieved. iii "on one side was to be seen a long train of flagons, leathern bottles, flasks, cans, glass bottles, barrels, nipperkins, pint pots, quart pots, pottles, gallons and old fashioned semaises (swindging wooden pots such as those out of which the Germans fill their glasses)...on another were a hundred sorts of drinking glasses, cups, cisterns, ewers, false cups, tumblers, bowls, mazers, mugs, jugs, goblets, talboys and such other Bacchic artillery.'''' Rabelais Pantagruel 1532. iv Contents Page List of Figures ix Acknowledgements xii Chapter 1 Introduction and Present State of Studies 1.1 The Aims of This Thesis 1 1.2 The Development of Glass Studies 2 1.2.1 The Nature of Glass 2 1.2.2 Previous Studies of English Glass 3 1.3 Glass Production in The Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries 5 1.3.1 The Documentary Industry 5 1.3.2 The Excavation of Glass Production Sites 8 1.4 Post-Medieval Archaeology in England 11 1.5 The Development of Consumption Studies 11 1.6 Summary 13 Chapter 2 Contemporary Accounts of Dining and Glass 2.1 Introduction 14 2.2 The Progress of the Meal 15 2.3 The Historical Presence of Glass 20 2.4 Contemporary Attitudes to Glass 26 2.5 Summary 29 Chapter 3 The Background to the Typological Construction 3.1 The Development of the Concept of Typological Classification 30 3.1.1 Statistical Classification 30 3.1.2 Contextualised Typology 31 3.2 The Methodological Basis for The Classification 33 3.2.1 The Purpose of the Classification 33 3.2.2 Variations in Metal 33 2.3.3 Division into Type, Group and Subgroup 34 3.3 The Type Variations 35 3.3.1 Beakers 35 3.3.2 Tankards 36 3.3.3 Goblets 36 3.3.4 Jugs 37 3.3.5 Flasks 37 3.3.6 Bowls and Dishes 3 8 3.3.7 Jars 38 3.3.8 Chemical and Medicinal 38 3.4 Discussion of Decorative Techniques Described in the Classification 39 3.4.1 Formative Techn iques 3 9 3.4.2 Late Stage Techniques 41 3.4.3 Cold Working Techniques 42 v Chapter 4 A Typology of Glass Vessels 1500-1640 4.1 Beakers 44 4.1.1 Cylindrical Beakers 44 4.1.2 Barrel Beakers 48 4.1.3 Squat Beakers 49 4.1.4 Pedestal Beakers 5 0 4.1.5 Pedestal Fluted Beakers 53 4.1.6 Roemers 54 4.2 Tankards 55 4.2.1 Cylindrical Tankards 55 4.2.2 Bellied Tankards 55 4.3 Goblets 57 4.3.1 Knopped Stem Goblets 57 4.3.2 Mould-Blown Stem Goblets 60 4.3.3 Compound Stem Goblets 61 4.3.4 Pedestal Stem Goblets, single parison 62 4.3.5 Applied Pedestal Goblets 63 4.3.6 Rod Stem Goblets 64 4.3.7 Cage Stem Goblets 64 4.3.8 Goblet Lids 64 4.4 Jugs 66 4.4.1 Pedestal Jugs 66 4.4.2 Globular Jugs 66 4.5 Flasks 67 4.5.1 Globular Flasks 67 4.5.2 Oval Flasks 68 4.5.3 Pedestal Flasks 68 4.5.4 Conical Flasks 69 4.5.5 Case Bottles 69 4.6 Bowls & Dishes 71 4.6.1 Pedestal Bowls 71 4.6.2 Hemispherical Bowls 71 4.6.3 Dishes 72 4.7 Jars 73 4.7.1 Albarello Jars 73 4.7.2 Globular Jars 73 4.8 Chemical & Medicinal 75 4.8.1 Distilling 75 4.8.2 Urinals 75 4.8.3 Lamps 75 Chapter 5 Glass Vessels from Urban Contexts 5.1 Introduction 76 5.2 Urban Archaeology in England 76 5.3 Gracechurch Street, London 78 5.4 Abacus House, London 82 5.5 Chester 84 5.5.1 Crook Street 84 5.5.2 Hunter Street 85 5.6 Bagshot 87 5.7 Poole 89 vi 5.8 Glass from Urban Contexts; Summary 91 5.8.1 Chronological Trends in the Material 91 5.8.2 Inns and Household 92 5.8.3 The Context of the Deposits 93 5.8.4 The Use of Glass in the Urban Setting 94 5.8.5 Conclusions 96 Chapter 6 Glass Vessels from Palaces, Castles and Manors 6.1 Introduction 97 6.2 The Archaeology of the Elite 97 6.3 Camber Castle 99 6.4 Acton Court 102 6.5 Nonsuch Palace 105 6.6 Norton Priory 108 6.7 Eccleshall Castle 110 6.8 Wood Hall 113 6.9 Glass from Elite Contexts; Summary 116 6.9.1 Chronological trends in the Material 116 6.9.2 The Context of the Deposits 117 6.9.3 The Use of Glass in the Elite Setting 118 6.9.4 Conclusions 119 Chapter 7 Dining, Taste and the Consumption of Glass 7.1 Introduction 121 7.2 Dining and the Consumption of Culture 121 7.2.1 The Complexities of Dining 122 7.2.2 Manners and Meanings 123 7.2.3 Material Culture and the Expression of Taste 124 7.3 Emulation and Innovation 128 7.3.1 Echoes of the Traditional 128 7.3.2 New Perspectives in Style 130 7.3.3 Conservatism and the Novelty of Taste 132 7.4 The Exclusivity of Design 134 7.4.1 Mould-Blown Stems 134 7.4.2 Engraved Vessels 141 7.4.3 Decorative Metaphors and the Puritan Ethic 148 7.5 To Shards at the Last? An Archaeology of Repair 150 7.6 Conspicuous Consumption and the Discard of Material Culture 156 7.6.1 The Patterned Discard of Glass 156 7.6.2 Consuming Theories 157 7.6.3 The Use of Glass as an Expression of Conspicuous 158 Consumption 7.7 Summary 160 Chapter 8 Conclusions 8.1 A Typology for Vessel Glass in England 161 8.2 Glass from the Study Sites 162 8.3 The Style and Use of Glass 163 8.4 Limitations of the Thesis 166 8.5 Directions for Further Research 166 Bibliography 168 Glossary 197 vii Illustrations Appendix 1 Catalogues of Glass from the Study Sites Appendix 2 Mould-Blown Stem Descriptions Appendix 3 Gazetteer of Sites with Published Groups of Glass Illustrations Figure Page 1.1 Location of Sites Mentioned in the Text 205 1.2 Number of Published Glass Reports 206 2.1 Henry VIII Inventory 207 2.2 Sir William More's Inventory 208 2.3 Kenilworth Castle Inventory 209 3 .1 Goblet Bowl Forms 210 4.1 Cylindrical Beakers (4.1.1) 211 4.2 Barrel Beakers (4.1.2) 212 4.3 Squat Beakers (4.1.3) 213 4.4 Pedestal Beakers (4.1.4) 214 4.5 Pedestal Fluted Beakers (4.1.5) 215 4.6 Roemers (4.1.6) 216 4.7 Tankards (4.2) 217 4.8 Knopped
Recommended publications
  • MASARYK UNIVERSITY Britain's Castles and Their Unique Role In
    MASARYK UNIVERSITY Faculty of Education Department of English Language and Literature Britain's Castles and Their Unique Role in the Middle Ages Bachelor Thesis Brno 2016 Supervisor: Author: Mgr. Zdeněk Janík, M.A., Ph.D. Dagmar Janíková Declaration I declare that I worked on this thesis on my own and that all information gathered for its compilation are from the sources which are cited in the references. Brno, March 15, 2016 Dagmar Janíková Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor Mgr. Zdeněk Janík, M.A., Ph.D. for his helpful advice and valuable comments. I am very grateful for his useful guidance. Annotation The bachelor thesis deals with the history of British castles in the Middle Ages. The research concerns with the role of castles, their construction, important historical events and key persons. The chapters are divided according to the main roles and events in the chronological order. The first chapter analyses the purpose of the initial castles. The second chapter analyses castles in wars, but also as residences in peace. In the final part of the thesis a detailed look is taken at the strategy of taking control over the Welsh and Scottish people by means of the castles. It also examines Robert Bruce's policy of destroying the castles in Scotland. The thesis focuses on the importance of building castles and analyses why they are an integral part of British history. The books by Christopher Gravett and Norman J.G. Pounds are used as the main sources of the historical facts. Key words: Motte-and-bailey Castles, the Normans, William the Conqueror, Castles, Edward I, Siege Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Kenilworth Castle, 1125–1660
    STUDY OF AN HISTORIC SITE: KENILWORTH CASTLE The development of Kenilworth Castle, 1125–1660 “The finest surviving example of a semi-royal palace of the later middle ages, significant for its scale, form and quality of workmanship.” Kenilworth Castle as described by architectural historian Anthony Emery Timeline c.1120 Geoffrey de Clinton builds a motte and bailey on land granted by Henry I 1173–74 Henry II acquires the castle from the grandson of Geoffrey de Clinton 1180–82 A Great Keep is constructed 1210–15 King John oversees the building of outer walls and the creation of the Great Mere 1244 Simon de Montfort is appointed governor of the castle by Henry III and oversees the creation of the Brays 1266 A great siege is held and the castle reverts to the crown 1361 The castle passes by marriage to John of Gaunt and is rebuilt on a huge scale 1399 John of Gaunt’s son becomes Henry IV and the castle reverts to the crown 1414–17 Henry V constructs the pleasure or banqueting hall 1553 Edward VI grants the castle to John Dudley, Duke of Northumberland who is later executed by Mary I and the castle reverts to the crown 1563 Elizabeth I grants the castle to Dudley’s son Robert, Earl of Leicester 1564 Leicester makes extensive alterations to the castle and to the gardens 1570 Leicester’s gatehouse is built 1571–75 Refurbishments are made for the visits of Elizabeth I, including a private dance chamber 1588 On Leicester’s death, the castle is inherited by his brother Ambrose, Earl of Warwick 1611 The castle is recovered by James I 1642 Charles
    [Show full text]
  • The Anarchy: War and Status in 12Th-Century Landscapes of Conflict
    Book review article: ‘The Anarchy: War and Status in 12th century Landscapes of Conflict’ Chapter 2, Historical Outline and the Geog- raphy of ‘Anarchy’, is a good summary of complex events, including the important point that control of Normandy was central to the struggle (p 30). The geographical spread of activity is illustrated by interesting maps of itineraries, particularly of Stephen, divided into phases of his reign. Early on, he went to Cornwall and north onto Scottish territory (in both cases accompanied by his army) but most- ly he was in central and southern England, with forays to Lincolnshire and, occasionally, York. WAGING WAR: FIELDS OF CONFLICT AND SIEGE WARFARE The subject of Chapter 3 (title above) is a critical issue in assessments of the Anarchy. Creighton and Wright note that pitched battles were rare and sieges dominated (p 34, 40). Church authorities attempted to regulate war, in particular protecting the Church’s posses- sions (p 36), but also deployed ‘spiritual weap- ons’, such as the saints’ banners on the mast The Anarchy: War and Status in (the Standard) at Northallerton (p 45). And a 12th-Century Landscapes of Conflict bishop, in a pre-battle speech at Northallerton, Authors: Oliver H. Creighton as recorded by Henry of Huntingdon, promised Duncan W. Wright that English defenders killed in combat would Publishers: Liverpool University Press, Ex- be absolved from all penalty for sin. [HH 71] eter Studies in Medieval Europe Laying waste enemies’ estates was a normal ISBN 978-1-78138-242-4 by-product of Anglo-Norman warfare, not Hardback, 346 pages unique to Stephanic conflict (p 37-8).
    [Show full text]
  • The Castle Studies Group Bulletin Volume 26 May 2018
    THE CASTLE STUDIES GROUP BULLETIN VOLUME 26 MAY 2018 Inside this issue Editorial Editorial 1 A few weeks ago the CSG Annual Diary Dates Conference took place; this year looking 1-2 at castles in south Munster in Ireland. Data Protection While there will be a full report of the 2 conference in the next journal, I want to CSG Oct Conference thank Brian Hodkinson and Dan Tietzch- 3 Tyler for organising it. I’m now very News in England much looking forward to the next annual 4-7 conference being held in the Midlands News in Ireland next year. 8-9 News in Wales Although the winter months are not particularly known for archaeological 10-12 News in Scotland excavations, as you will see in this 12-14 newsletter, there has been much conservation, restoration and survey Europe/World News work being undertaken recently. 15-17 Other News Thank you to all who have contributed or 21-23 suggested pieces for this bulletin, the deadline for the next bulletin is 25th Castle Studies Trust August. 20-21 M.Phil. & Ph.D. Therron Welstead Research CSG Bulletin Editor 22 …………………………………… Diary Dates Castle Studies: Current Research and the future 13 Oct 2018 Society of Antiquities of London Further information on page 3 CSG conference April Above: th th Carrigadrohid Castle 11 -14 April 2019 Above right: There will be a special pre-conference day on April 10th where we will CSG on safari in endeavour to cover 10 mottes / ringworks in the day. Ightermurragh Castle Further details will be included in the next newsletter 1 ©T.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenilworth Castle
    Student Booklet Kenilworth Castle 1 Introduction and Overview We hope you have been lucky enough to visit this historic site but even if you have not, we hope this guide will help you to really understand the castle and how it developed over time. Where is Kenilworth Castle? The castle and landscape: Aerial view of the castle, mere and surrounding landscape. 2 What is the layout of Kenilworth Castle? Castle Plan 3 Key Phases 1100s Kenilworth under the De Clintons 1120-1174 Kenilworth as a royal fortress 1174-1244 1200s Kenilworth under Simon de Montfort 1244-65 Kenilworth under the House of Lancaster 1266-136 1300s Kenilworth under John of Gaunt 1361-99 1400s Kenilworth under the Lancastrians and the Tudors 1399-1547 1500s Kenilworth under the Dudley family 1547-88 1600s Kenilworth under the Stuarts 1612-65 1700s Kenilworth under the Hydes 1665-1700s Activity 1. Make your own copy of this timeline on a sheet of A4 paper. Just mark in the seven main phases. As you read through this guide add in details of the development of the castle. This timeline will probably become a bit messy but don’t worry! Keep it safe and at the end of the guide we will give you some ideas on how to summarise what you have learned. 2. There are seven periods of the castle's history listed in the timeline. Some of the English Heritage experts came up with titles for five of the periods of the castle's history: • An extraordinary palace • A stunning place of entertainment • A castle fit for kings • A formidable fortress • A royal stronghold 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology of Castle Slighting in the Middle Ages
    The Archaeology of Castle Slighting in the Middle Ages Submitted by Richard Nevell, to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Archaeology in October 2017. This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ……………………………………………………………………………… Abstract Medieval castle slighting is the phenomenon in which a high-status fortification is demolished in a time of conflict. At its heart are issues about symbolism, the role of castles in medieval society, and the politics of power. Although examples can be found throughout the Middle Ages (1066–1500) in England, Wales and Scotland there has been no systematic study of the archaeology of castle slighting. Understanding castle slighting enhances our view of medieval society and how it responded to power struggles. This study interrogates the archaeological record to establish the nature of castle slighting: establishing how prevalent it was chronologically and geographically; which parts of castles were most likely to be slighted and why this is significant; the effects on the immediate landscape; and the wider role of destruction in medieval society. The contribution of archaeology is especially important as contemporary records give little information about this phenomenon. Using information recovered from excavation and survey allows this thesis to challenge existing narratives about slighting, especially with reference to the civil war between Stephen and Matilda (1139–1154) and the view that slighting was primarily to prevent an enemy from using a fortification.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-1500 Military Sites Scheduling Selection Guide Summary
    Pre-1500 Military Sites Scheduling Selection Guide Summary Historic England’s scheduling selection guides help to define which archaeological sites are likely to meet the relevant tests for national designation and be included on the National Heritage List for England. For archaeological sites and monuments, they are divided into categories ranging from Agriculture to Utilities and complement the listing selection guides for buildings. Scheduling is applied only to sites of national importance, and even then only if it is the best means of protection. Only deliberately created structures, features and remains can be scheduled. The scheduling selection guides are supplemented by the Introductions to Heritage Assets which provide more detailed considerations of specific archaeological sites and monuments. This selection guide offers an overview of archaeological monuments or sites designed to have a military function and likely to be deemed to have national importance, and sets out criteria to establish for which of those scheduling may be appropriate. The guide aims to do two things: to set these sites within their historical context, and to give an introduction to some of the overarching and more specific designation considerations. This document has been prepared by Listing Group. It is one is of a series of 18 documents. This edition published by Historic England July 2018. All images © Historic England unless otherwise stated. Please refer to this document as: Historic England 2018 Pre-1500 Military Sites: Scheduling Selection Guide. Swindon. Historic England. HistoricEngland.org.uk/listing/selection-criteria/scheduling-selection/ Front cover The castle at Burton-in-Lonsdale, North Yorkshire was built around 1100 as a ringwork; later it was reconstructed as a motte with two baileys.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Kenilworth Castle 12Th Century
    THE HISTORY OF KENILWORTH CASTLE 12TH CENTURY - When and why people first created the site Kenilworth Castle was founded in the early 1120s by Geoffrey de Clinton, Lord Chamberlain and treasurer to Henry I Clinton was a local rival to Roger de Beaumont, the Earl of Warwick and owner of the neighbouring Warwick Castle, and the king made Clinton the sheriff in Warwickshire to act as a counterbalance to Beaumont's power. Henry I’s son had died and so he needed to show that he was powerful even though he did not have an heir The castle's original form is uncertain. It has been suggested that it consisted of a motte, an earthen mound surmounted by wooden buildings; however, the stone great tower may have been part of the original design. Henry II (Henry I’s grandson)succeeded to the throne at the end of a Civil war that lasted from 1135 to 1154 but during the revolt of 1173–74 he faced a significant uprising led by his son, Henry, backed by the French crown. The conflict spread across England and Kenilworth was garrisoned by Henry II's forces; By this point Kenilworth Castle consisted of the great keep, the inner bailey wall, a basic causeway across the smaller lake that preceded the creation of the Great Mere, and the local chase for hunting. De Clinton’s Keep. Windows were added much later, these would have been arrow slits and fishtail arrow slits in the original keep. THE HISTORY OF KENILWORTH CASTLE 13TH CENTURY – King John - Henry's successor, Richard I, paid relatively little attention to Kenilworth, but under King John significant building resumed at the castle.
    [Show full text]
  • Medieval Castles
    MEDIEVAL CASTLES Marilyn Stokstad GREENWOOD PRESS MEDIEVAL CASTLES Titles in the Series Greenwood Guides to Historic Events of the Medieval World The Black Death The Crusades Eleanor of Aquitaine, Courtly Love, and the Troubadours Genghis Khan and Mongol Rule Joan of Arc and the Hundred Years War Magna Carta Medieval Castles Medieval Cathedrals The Medieval City Medieval Science and Technology The Puebloan Society of Chaco Canyon The Rise of Islam MEDIEVAL CASTLES Marilyn Stokstad Greenwood Guides to Historic Events of the Medieval World Jane Chance, Series Editor GREENWOOD PRESS Westport, Connecticut • London Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Stokstad, Marilyn, 1929– Medieval castles / Marilyn Stokstad. p. cm. — (Greenwood guides to historic events of the medieval world) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0–313–32525–1 (alk. paper) 1. Castles—Great Britain. 2. Castles—France. I. Title. II. Series. UG429.G7S76 2005 355.7'094'0902—dc22 2004028450 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data is available. Copyright © 2005 by Marilyn Stokstad All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 2004028450 ISBN: 0–313–32525–1 First published in 2005 Greenwood Press, 88 Post Road West, Westport, CT 06881 An imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. www.greenwood.com Printed in the United States of America The paper used in this book complies with the Permanent Paper Standard issued by the National Information Standards Organization (Z39.48–1984). 10987654321 CONTENTS Illustrations xi Series Foreword xiii Advisory Board xxv Preface xxvii Chronology xxxi Overview: Castles in Context xxxvii Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Goodrich Castle OCR Spec B
    OCR HISTORY AROUND US Site Proposal Form Example from English Heritage The Criteria The study of the selected site must focus on the relationship between the site, other historical sources and the aspects listed in a) to n) below. It is therefore essential that centres choose a site that allows learners to use its physical features, together with other historical sources as appropriate, to understand all of the following: a) The reasons for the location of the site within its surroundings b) When and why people first created the site c) The ways in which the site has changed over time d) How the site has been used throughout its history e) The diversity of activities and people associated with the site f) The reasons for changes to the site and to the way it was used g) Significant times in the site’s past: peak activity, major developments, turning points h) The significance of specific features in the physical remains at the site i) The importance of the whole site either locally or nationally, as appropriate j) The typicality of the site based on a comparison with other similar sites k) What the site reveals about everyday life, attitudes and values in particular periods of history l) How the physical remains may prompt questions about the past and how historians frame these as valid historical enquiries m) How the physical remains can inform artistic reconstructions and other interpretations of the site n) The challenges and benefits of studying the historic environment 1 Copyright © OCR 2018 Site Name: GOODRICH CASTLE Created by: ENGLISH HERITAGE LEARNING TEAM Please provide an explanation of how your site meets each of the following points and include the most appropriate visual images of your site.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spiral Stair Or Vice: Its Origins, Role and Meaning in Medieval Stone Castles. Thesis Submitted in Accordance with the Requ
    The Spiral Stair or Vice: its origins, role and meaning in medieval stone castles. Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Charles Ryder February 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS For all their help and support, I wish to record my warmest thanks to the staff of the British Library, John Ryland‟s Library, the University of Liverpool and especially the staff of the University of Chester; to the owners of structures with spiral stairs who opened their doors to me, especially the de Vere family at Hedingham Castle and Mr Louis de Wett and Ms Gabrielle Drake at Much Wenlock Priory; to the custodians and managers of historical sites and in particular the lady who gave me a private tour of Charlemagne‟s Chapel, Aachen whose name I never knew and Mr N Fahy at Castle Rising; to a number of members of the Castle Studies Group, the M6 Group and the Liverpool Centre for Medieval and Renaissance Studies who gave good advice that assisted in my research both when crossing muddy fields in cold rain to visit castles, in warm lecture rooms and by various forms of mail; to people in Japan and China who were pleased to answer my questions and send photographs and articles; to Jean Mesqui, who encouraged my early research and corrected my French writing; almost finally, to my wife who, enduring much, visited almost as many castles as me and developed a excellent eye – far better than mine – for spotting castle features; however, above all I give thanks to my primary supervisor, Professor Peter Gaunt, who was my rock in the storm and from whom I learned many things, not always related to history and castles.
    [Show full text]
  • Cline Family and Beyond
    The Family Volume II Appendices ii Contents Volume 11 Appendix A - Ancient Branches, 1 Britons, Franks, Hebrews, Scandinavian, Scythian, Sicambrian Appendix B - Direct Ancestral Links to the Ancient Past, 19 Norman-English, Celtic-French, Anglo-Saxon, Mayflower, Hohenstauffen-English, Hebrew Appendix C - Virginia Ligons, 51 Documents, Extended Families, “From Jackson to Vicksburg 1861-1865 - Memories of the War Between the States” Appendix D - Scottish Clan Connections, 85 Member Clans of the Standing Council of Scottish Chiefs: Bruce, Campbell, Drummond, Dunbar, Gordon, Graham, Hamilton, Hanna, Hay, Home, Keith, Ker, Leslie, Lindsay, Lyon, MacDonald, Montgomery, Murray, Ross,, Scott, Sempill, Sinclair, Stuart of Bute, Sutherland, Wallace. The Armigerous Clans and Families of Sc otland: Armstrong, Baillie, Douglas, Fleming, Hepburn, Livingston, Lundin, Muir, Seton, Somerville, Stewart (Royal), Stewart of Appin, Stewart of Atholl. Other Clan/Sept Connec tions: Angus, Barclay, Galloway, Haye, Knights Templar (Dress/Huntimg), Roslyn Chaple, Royal Stewart Appendix E - Magna Charta Barons, 131 The Baronage of the Magna Charta & Biographies: William d’Albini (Aubigny), Roger Bigod, Hugh Bigod, Henry de Bohun, Richard de Clare, Gilbert de Clare, John FitzRobert, Robert FitzWalter, William de Fortibus, William de Hardell (Mayor of London), William de Huntingfield, William de Lanvallei, John de Lacie, William Malet, Geoffrey de Mandeville, William Marshall Jr., Roger de Montbegon, Richard de Montifichet, Roger de Mobray, William de Mowbray, Saire
    [Show full text]