May 20, 2020 Governor Gavin Newsom State Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

May 20, 2020 Governor Gavin Newsom State of California 1303 10th Street, Suite 1173 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Governor Newsom: We commend you for your early and thoughtful response to COVID-19 in March. The stay-at- home orders and social distancing measures allowed California to have a fighting chance in the COVID-19 pandemic. The steps taken have proven to work, as the trend in California has not matched predictions and forecasts. Thanks to all of the residents and businesses across the state who have voluntarily adhered to all State restrictions and guidance for almost two months, many counties have successfully flattened the curve. In addition to this, counties have worked diligently to expand the capacity of medical facilities, gather sufficient supplies and resources, and increase testing. We appreciate your announcement last week allowing local Health Officers, based on data- driven metrics and an attestation, to begin a phased reopening of certain lower risk businesses and activities at the local level. However, we respectfully request you amend your statewide Orders to allow local Health Officers to phase in reopening of additional lower risk businesses during Stage 2 of your roadmap. Per the Johns Hopkins Public Health Principles for Phased Reopening during COVID-19: Guidance to Governors, businesses in the personal care sector, gyms and fitness studios, and recreational facilities have low to medium contact intensity and number of contacts as well as a higher ability to modify operations. Given this, we urge you to consider allowing the reopening of these businesses with appropriate modifications during Stage 2 of your roadmap. The primary purpose of the stay-at-home order is to protect the health and safety of California residents. Health and safety is all encompassing, and it is a constant balancing act to ensure that we are doing all we can on that front. We must keep in mind the negative impact prolonged isolation and economic uncertainty also have on public health and safety. Please consider immediately amending your Orders to allow businesses in the personal care sector, gyms and fitness studios, and recreational facilities to reopen during Stage 2, where supported by local data and appropriate mitigation measures. Such action will allow for more individuals and businesses to begin a phased-in return to work. While businesses will have to modify operations to comply with necessary mitigation measures, the private and public sectors are up to the challenge in order to provide some economic relief while continuing to keep cases low. Thank you for your consideration of our request. Sincerely, JAMES GALLAGHER JAY OBERNOLTE Assemblyman, 3rd District Assemblyman, 33rd District JORDAN CUNNINGHAM JIM PATTERSON Assemblyman, 35th District Assemblyman, 23rd District TOM LACKEY FRANK BIGELOW Assemblyman, 36th District Assemblyman, 5th District MEGAN DAHLE STEVEN CHOI Assemblywoman, 1st District Assemblyman, 68th District DEVON MATHIS CHAD MAYES Assemblyman, 26th District Assemblyman, 42nd District KEVIN KILEY BILL BROUGH Assemblyman, 6th District Assemblyman, 73rd District VINCE FONG Assemblyman, 34th District .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Guide to New Legislators
Guide to New Legislators 2017 Edition Contents Locating Your Senate and Assembly Districts 1. Go to http://www.legislature.ca.gov/ 2. Look for the Blue Box on the right side of the screen titled “Find My District” 3. Click on Search by Address. (This web page will be updated on December 3, 2012 to reflect new Districts. If you have this tool saved in your web browser it will have a new URL after this date.) 4. Enter your Street, City and Zip into the fields and click Find. New Senator Biographies .. 3 District 3, Senator Bill Dodd………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 3 District 9, Senator Nancy Skinner…………………………...……………………………………………………………………………….3 District 11, Senator Scott Wiener…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 District 21 - Senator Scott Wilk……………………………..………………………………………………………………………………..4 District 25, Senator Anthony Portantino…………………………….…………………………………………………………………..5 District 27, Senator Henry Stern.…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….5 District 29, Senator Josh Newman……………………………………………………………………………………………….…….……5 District 35, Senator Steven Bradford……………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 District 39, Senator Toni Atkins….……………………………………………………………………………………………………………6 New Assembly member Biographies District 4, Assembly member Cecila Aguiar-Curry….……………………………………………………………………………….7 District 6, Assembly member Kevin Kiley……….……………………………………………………………………………………….7 District 12, Assembly member Heath Flora…..………………………….……………………………………………………….…….8 District 14, Assembly member Tim Grayson……………………………………………………………………………………..…....8
[Show full text]
California State Assembly
January 25, 2021 Honorable Anthony Rendon Honorable Toni G. Atkins Speaker of the Assembly President pro Tempore of the Senate State Capitol, Room 219 State Capitol, Room 205 Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Speaker Rendon and President Pro Tem Atkins, We respectfully request that the Legislature convene a joint, bi-partisan committee to hold oversight hearings regarding the Newsom Administration’s unwillingness to share COVID-19 data with the public. To regain the public’s trust, it is crucial that we share data with the public, including the formulas and calculations that are being used to guide the Governor’s decisions related to responding to the pandemic. This information is critical to understanding the reasons behind the abysmal vaccine rollout, as well as the seemingly-random issuance of stay-at-home orders and business closures. It is important to hold the Administration accountable when so many lives are at stake. During the Governor’s recent stay-at-home order, his Administration has yet to share the data relied upon to lift the order in the Greater Sacramento region, or information in the recent statewide lift, despite the fact that ICU capacity in some regions is far below the 15% threshold he established when he imposed the order. This has confused communities, counties and businesses, leaving them unprepared to take immediate action. The Administration’s justification that the data and modeling are too complicated is both inadequate and quite frankly, insulting. The public has the right to know what is behind his decision-making process. Specifically we believe the public has a right to the following information: Data, metrics, calculations, and formulas being used to make decisions regarding stay-at- home orders and vaccine distribution.
[Show full text]
MINUTES CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING May 13, 2014
MINUTES CITY COUNCIL Steven Choi SPECIAL MEETING Mayor Jeffrey Lalloway Mayor Pro Tempore May 13, 2014 Larry Agran City Council Chamber Councilmember One Civic Center Plaza Beth Krom Councilmember Irvine, CA 92606 Christina Shea Councilmember CALL TO ORDER – 2:02 P.M. The special meeting of the Irvine City Council was called to order at 2:02 p.m. on May 13, 2014 in the City Council Chamber, Irvine Civic Center, One Civic Center Plaza, Irvine, California; Mayor Choi presiding. ROLL CALL Present: 5 Councilmember: Larry Agran Councilmember: Beth Krom Councilmember: Christina Shea Mayor Pro Tempore: Jeffrey Lalloway Mayor: Steven Choi 1. CLOSED SESSION 1.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) (two cases) (1) City of Irvine v. County of Orange, et al. (Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2013-00622921), (2) City of Irvine v. County of Orange, et al. (Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, Case No. GO47895) City Council Minutes May 13, 2014 1.2 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) (two cases) (1) City of Irvine et al. v. Michael Cohen, et al. (Sacramento County Superior Court Case No. 34-2013-80001682), (2) City of Irvine et al. v. Ana J. Matosantos, et al. (Sacramento County Superior Court Case No. 34- 2012-80001161), (3) Irvine Community Land Trust, et al. v. Ana J. Matosantos et al. (Sacramento County Superior Court Case No. 34- 2013-80001535) 1.3 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) (one case): Orange County Fire Authority et al.
[Show full text]
Summary of Motions California State Retirees (Csr) Board of Directors Meeting
SUMMARY OF MOTIONS CALIFORNIA STATE RETIREES (CSR) BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING Holiday Inn, Sacramento February 22, 2018 7. Approval of October 26, 2017 Board Meeting Minutes CSR 1/18/1 MOTION: Oliveira, second by Hueg - that the CSR Board of Directors approve the minutes of the October 26, 2017 meeting as printed. CARRIED. 11. Program Reports - HQ CSR 2/18/1 MOTION: Fountain, second by Hueg – that the CSR Board of Directors buy the three promotion items, hats, totes and lapel pins, in bulk and send out numbers to chapters. CARRIED. 12. Political Action Committee CSR 3/18/1 MOTION: Oliveira, second by Fountain – that the CSR Board of Directors endorse incumbents Controller Betty Yee and Secretary of State Alex Padilla for reelection. CARRIED. CSR 4/18/1 MOTION: Umemoto, second by Jimenez – that the CSR Board of Directors endorse Treasurer Fiona Ma. CARRIED. CSR 5/18/1 MOTION: Jimenez, second by Oliveira – that the CSR Board of Directors endorse the following Assembly incumbents seeking reelection: AD 01 Brian Dahle (R-Bieber), AD 02 Jim Wood (D-Healdsburg), AD 03 James Gallagher (R-Nicolaus), AD 04 Cecilia Aguiar-Curry (D-Napa), AD 05 Frank Bigelow (R-O’Neals), AD 06 Kevin Kiley (R-El Dorado Hills), AD 07 Kevin McCarty (D-Sacramento), AD 08 Ken Cooley (D-Rancho Cordova), AD 09 Jim Cooper (D-Elk Grove), AD 10 Marc Levine (D-San Rafael), AD 11 Jim Frazier (D-Oakley), AD 12 Heath Flora (R-Modesto), AD 13 Susan Eggman (D-Stockton), AD 14 Tim Grayson (D-Concord), AD 16 Catharine Baker (D-Dublin), AD 17 David Chiu (D-San Francisco), AD 18 Rob Bonta (D-Alameda), AD 19 Phil Ting (D-San Francisco), AD 20 Bill Quirk (D- Hayward), AD 21 Adam Gray (D-Merced).
[Show full text]
California Elections and Community College Measures November 2016 Election Round up November 14, 2016
California Elections and Community College Measures November 2016 Election Round Up November 14, 2016 OVERVIEW While the election was last week, ballots are still being counted and final certified results are due to the Secretary of State for presidential electors on December 6, 2016, and for all other state contests on December 9, 2016. The Secretary of State will certify the statewide results by December 16, 2016. Until the results are certified, the outcome of close races may change from what is presented below. Focusing on results affecting California Community Colleges, the election provided mostly positive results including the passage of the statewide bond measure, Proposition 51, as well as a number of local bonds. Californians passed several tax measures including Proposition 55, which will continue to provide funding for education. Voters in San Francisco passed an extension of the parcel tax to help fund the City College of San Francisco as well as another local measure that increases the transfer tax rate for sales of residential and commercial properties. Proponents state, that with the passage of this measure, the City of San Francisco could provide free community college. Funds from this local measure will go to the City’s general fund; however, in July, the Board of Supervisors passed a resolution making the City College of San Francisco free for residents a top priority for the new revenue. If results hold in the State Assembly, the Democrats will have gained a supermajority with three seats switching party hands. However, this could change because one of those seats remains a close contest in Assembly District 55 and all three changes are needed for a supermajority.
[Show full text]
Memorandum 5.1
Memorandum 5.1 DATE: January 4, 2021 TO: Alameda County Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Carolyn Clevenger, Deputy Executive Director of Planning and Policy Maisha Everhart, Director of Government Affairs and Communications SUBJECT: State and federal legislative activities update and approval of the 2021 Legislative Program Recommendation This item is to provide the Commission with an update on federal, state, regional, and local legislative activities and to approve the 2021 Alameda CTC Legislative Program. Summary Each year, Alameda CTC adopts a Legislative Program to provide direction for its legislative and policy activities for the year. The purpose of the Legislative Program is to establish funding, regulatory and administrative principles to guide Alameda CTC’s legislative advocacy. It is designed to be broad and flexible, allowing Alameda CTC to pursue legislative and administrative opportunities that may arise during the year, and to respond to political processes in the region as well as in Sacramento and Washington, D.C. Legislative, policy and funding partnerships throughout the Bay Area and California will be key to the success of the 2021 Legislative Program. The 2021 Alameda CTC Legislative Program retains many of the 2020 priorities and is divided into 5 sections: 1. Transportation Funding 2. Multimodal Transportation, Land Use, Safety and Equity 3. Project Delivery and Operations 4. Climate Change and Technology 5. Partnerships Attachment A details the Alameda CTC proposed 2021 Legislative Program. Background The purpose of the 2021 Alameda CTC Legislative Program is to establish funding, regulatory and administrative principles to guide Alameda CTC’s legislative advocacy in the coming year. The program is developed to be broad and flexible, allowing Alameda CTC to pursue legislative and administrative opportunities that may arise during the year, and to respond to the changing political processes in the region, as well as in Sacramento and Washington, D.C.
[Show full text]
2021 Assembly Standing Committees
2021 ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEES COMMITTEE MEMBERS Accountability and Cottie Petrie-Norris (Chair), Jim Patterson (Vice Chair), Autumn Administrative R. Burke, Adam C. Gray, Tom Lackey, Jose Medina, Freddie Review Rodriguez Aging and Long-Term Adrin Nazarian (Chair), Randy Voepel (Vice Chair), Tasha Care Boerner Horvath, Lisa Calderon, Tom Lackey, Eloise Gómez Reyes, Blanca E. Rubio Agriculture Robert Rivas (Chair), Devon J. Mathis (Vice Chair), Cecilia M. Aguiar-Curry, Jordan Cunningham, Heath Flora, Adam C. Gray, Jacqui Irwin, Reginald Byron Jones-Sawyer, Sr., Marc Levine, Carlos Villapudua, Jim Wood Appropriations Lorena Gonzalez (Chair), Frank Bigelow (Vice Chair), Richard Bloom, Rob Bonta, Lisa Calderon, Wendy Carrillo, Ed Chau, Megan Dahle, Laurie Davies, Vince Fong, Jesse Gabriel, Eduardo Garcia, Sydney Kamlager, Marc Levine, Bill Quirk, Robert Rivas Arts, Entertainment, Sharon Quirk-Silva (Chair), Suzette Martinez Valladares (Vice Sports, Tourism, and Chair), David Chiu, Steven S. Choi, Ph.D., Laura Friedman, Internet Media Sydney Kamlager, Adrin Nazarian Banking and Finance Timothy S. Grayson (Chair), Phillip Chen (Vice Chair), Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, Autumn R. Burke, Sabrina Cervantes, Steven S. Choi, Ph.D., Jesse Gabriel, Cristina Garcia, Janet Nguyen, Cottie Petrie-Norris, Mark Stone, Buffy Wicks Budget Philip Y. Ting (Chair), Vince Fong (Vice Chair), Dr. Joaquin Arambula, Steve Bennett, Richard Bloom, Wendy Carrillo, David Chiu, Jim Cooper, Jim Frazier, Laura Friedman, James Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Reginald Byron Jones-Sawyer, Sr., Kevin Kiley, Tom Lackey, Alex Lee, Devon J. Mathis, Kevin McCarty, Jose Medina, Kevin Mullin, Adrin Nazarian, Patrick O'Donnell, Jim Patterson, James C. Ramos, Eloise Gómez Reyes, Luz M. Rivas, Blanca E. Rubio, Thurston "Smitty" Smith, Mark Stone, Suzette Martinez Valladares, Jim Wood Budget Richard Bloom (Chair), Steve Bennett, Laura Friedman, Kevin Subcommittee #3 Mullin, Jim Patterson, Luz M.
[Show full text]
California Election Breakdown
California Election Breakdown As campaigning really gears up with less than two weeks until the election, CRA wanted to highlight some races below that our members may find interesting to watch. Additionally, there are more in-depth analyses of competitive races on the following pages. Though there are no projected changes for control of the state legislature, the Democrats are targeting plenty of vulnerable Republican incumbents in the state house where voter registration trends have changed in their favor, which include Assembly Districts 35, 36, 55, and 68 and Senate District 21, 29, and 37. The Republicans, in addition to holding on to their vulnerable seats, are targeting a couple vulnerable Democrats themselves in Assembly Districts 74 and 77. However, the most interesting race may be the one that takes place behind closed doors: Assembly leadership. The end of session fiasco showed some intraparty and interhouse tensions coming to a head with bills dying at midnight as behind the scene squabbles made their way to the floor. The Speaker also came under fire for a proxy voting decision he made, which made national news headlines. Additionally, there is a vacancy in the Assembly leadership with Assembly Majority Leader’s decision to not run for re-election. This will all likely happen outside the public view, but it is something to watch for after the General Election. The story is a little bit different for congressional races. Democrats rode a wave of national enthusiasm to pick up some seats in traditionally Republican strongholds, such as the Central Valley and Orange County.
[Show full text]
April 7, 2021 Governor Gavin Newsom State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: Request for Statewide Emergency Declaration on Califo
April 7, 2021 Governor Gavin Newsom State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: Request for Statewide Emergency Declaration on California’s Drought Dear Governor Newsom: As Chairs of the Senate and Assembly Agriculture Committees, we submit to you the following request for a statewide declaration of emergency. In light of the recent water allocation announcement to California farmers and growers, we are writing to share our concerns and respectfully request that your administration take steps to address this pending statewide emergency. California produces half of the nation’s livestock and produce products, which are an essential part of our economy and a crucial aspect of our national security. In March of 2020 at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, frontline workers in the agricultural industry stepped up to keep food on the table for our state and nation. The pandemic exposed the vulnerabilities of our food supply chain and highlighted the importance of food and water security to prevent California’s reliance on foreign imports. The California Department of Water Resources (DWR), in conjunction with your administration, announced a five-percent allocation to farmers and growers on March 23, 2021. It is not without coincidence that this was also National Agriculture Day. This will weaken California’s food supply chain, and endanger underserved communities that depend upon clean, reliable water. Droughts are obviously not new to this state. We had similar drought conditions in 2014, when allocations to the State Water Project (SWP) were reduced to 5%. At that time, the Governor declared a state of emergency in order to provide flexibility and commonsense streamlining to utilize our limited water in the most efficient way possible.
[Show full text]
County of Los Angeles Presidential Primary Election 6
DEM 045 Dean C. Logan Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk I want to be a Permanent Vote By Mail voter. Vote You will automatically receive You a ballot and vote by mail every election Official Sample Ballot Presidential Primary Election June 7, 2016 Polls open at 7 am and close at 8 pm Application to Vote By Mail Application to Vote lavote.net Voting Instructions How to vote at your polling place on Election Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 Voting for write-in candidates How to vote for a person not listed on the ballot Write the name and office of the official write-in candidate in the “write-in” portion of the ballot. A list of “Qualified Write-in Candidates” is available eleven days before the election at lavote.net. You may not writein a candidate and vote for a candidate on the ballot for the same office. At the polling place 001 1 000000 2 OFFICIAL BALLOT Los Angeles County WRITE-IN BALLOT Board School Doe John Assembly State James Smith E FOLD HER By mail 1 2 OFFICIAL BALLOT School Board John Doe School Board John Doe School Board John Doe DEM LA 045-001 TP01 Information for voters About this election The ballot for this election includes both partisan and non-partisan nominating primaries. Your ballot may also include local non-partisan contests (County Board of Supervisors, County District Attorney, Superior Court Judges, Special or School Districts, or/and City offices). Party-Nominated Offices If you indicated a political party preference when you registered to vote, you may only vote for a presidential candidate for that particular party in the Presidential Primary Election.
[Show full text]
California Council for Affordable Housing Annual Legislative Report October 1, 2020
California Council for Affordable Housing Annual Legislative Report October 1, 2020 Prepared for Patrick Sabelhaus, Executive Director California Council for Affordable Housing Prepared by Political Solutions, LLC TO: Patrick Sabelhaus, Executive Director, California Council for Affordable Housing FROM: Tami Miller, Melissa Werner Political Solutions, LLC RE: 2020 Legislative Summary and 2021 Forecast DATE: October 1, 2020 Political Solutions, LLC enjoyed the opportunity to continue working with and representing the California Council for Affordable Housing (CCAH) this year. As CCAH is aware, 2020 was a very different legislative session, beleaguered by COVID-19, wildfires, and a tanked economy. However, as always, it is our honor and pleasure to work with CCAH, and we look forward to our combined success in 2021! GENERAL The second year of the 2019-2020 legislative session resumed in January with the Executive and Legislative branches setting aggressive policy goals. The enthusiasm behind these goals was also met with the state’s strong economic outlook. With more money to invest in state programs and infrastructure, both branches sought opportunities to close inequities and reinvest in the state and its people. The enthusiasm turned into concern as state leaders watched countries around the world respond to a dangerous virus that was viciously infecting and killing thousands. The virus, COVID-19, was shutting down economies and closing borders to mitigate transmission, and despite worldwide efforts to control the virus it was making its way to California. When COVID-19 reached our state, its impact on residents and the healthcare system was so severe local governments and the state ordered residents to stay home, non-essential businesses were closed, and mask mandates were issued.
[Show full text]
2202 Csa 2016 R5 Web.Pdf
CALIFORNIA STATE ASSEMBLY Your Legislature Welcome to the California State Assembly—the people’s house. I will always remember my first visit to the Capitol as a youth for two reasons: a terrifying number of squirrels in the park and all the scaffolding and construction materials that were seemingly everywhere. It turns out my family and I were visiting during the 1970s restoration of the Capitol, which returned this magnificent building to its original greatness. While you are here, you have the opportunity to see democracy in action. You can view the Legislature in session from the galleries on the third floor or watch committees debate legislation. A copy of the Daily File, which lists the day’s legislative activities, can be obtained from the Bill Room in the Capitol basement, or accessed online at Assembly.ca.gov. Assembly.ca.gov also provides the history, text, and analysis of every bill, and includes biographies, press releases, committee memberships, and other information about Members of the Assembly. I hope your visit to the State Capitol is a reminder that your voice has an impact on crafting California’s laws. There is no greater place to learn about California’s government and rich history than in our State Capitol. On behalf of all 80 Members of the Assembly, I hope you enjoy your visit. ANTHONY RENDON SPEAKER OF THE ASSEMBLY The California Legislature The Members The California Legislature is composed of an Assembly and a Senate, consisting of 80 and 40 Members, respectively. Members of the Assembly are elected for two-year terms, while Senators are elected for four-year terms, with one-half of the membership elected every two years.
[Show full text]