DOCSLIB.ORG

Corporate Tax 2018 14Th Edition a Practical Cross-Border Insight Into Corporate Tax Work

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Corporate Tax 2018 14Th Edition a Practical Cross-Border Insight Into Corporate Tax Work ICLGThe International Comparative Legal Guide to: Corporate Tax 2018 14th Edition A practical cross-border insight into corporate tax work Published by Global Legal Group, with contributions from: Arqués Ribert Junyer Advocats Maples and Calder Avanzia Taxand Limited Mayer Brown International LLP Baker Tilly Klitou and Partners MIM Law Business Services EOOD Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu Blackwood & Stone LP P+P Pöllath + Partners Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP SBH Law Office Boga & Associates Schindler Attorneys Cases & Lacambra Sele Frommelt & Partners Attorneys at Law Ltd. Čipčić-Bragadin and Associates Slaughter and May in cooperation with Tax Advisory TUK Ltd. SMPS Legal Concern Dialog law firm SSH Advisors Dobrinescu Dobrev SCA Stavropoulos & Partners Law Office Domański Zakrzewski Palinka T. P. Ostwal & Associates LLP, Chartered Accountants Greenwoods & Herbert Smith Freehills Tirard, Naudin K&D Law Firm Totalserve Management Limited Lenz & Staehelin VdA Vieira de Almeida LEX Law Offices Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz Ludovici Piccone & Partners Waselius & Wist The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Corporate Tax 2018 General Chapters: 1 Fiscal State Aid: the Kraken Wakes? – William Watson, Slaughter and May 1 2 The Implications for UK Taxpayers of BEPS Actions 2 (on Hybrid Mismatches), 4 (on Interest Deductibility) and 6 (on Treaty Access) – Sandy Bhogal & Kitty Swanson, Mayer Brown International LLP 6 Contributing Editor Country Question and Answer Chapters: William Watson, Slaughter and May 3 Albania Boga & Associates: Alketa Uruçi & Andi Pacani 12 Sales Director 4 Andorra Arqués Ribert Junyer Advocats: Daniel Arqués i Tomàs & Florjan Osmani Mireia Ribó i Bregolat 17 Account Director 5 Angola VdA Vieira de Almeida: Samuel Almeida & Joana Lobato Heitor 24 Oliver Smith 6 Armenia Concern Dialog law firm: Rustam Badasyan 30 Sales Support Manager Toni Hayward 7 Australia Greenwoods & Herbert Smith Freehills: Adrian O’Shannessy & Tony Frost 35 Editor 8 Austria Schindler Attorneys: Clemens Philipp Schindler & Martina Gatterer 44 Nicholas Catlin Senior Editors 9 Belarus SBH Law Office: Anastasiya Malakhova & Evgeniya Starosotnikova 52 Suzie Levy 10 Bulgaria Baker Tilly Klitou and Partners Business Services EOOD: Svetla Marinova Caroline Collingwood & Svetlana Dermendjieva 59 Chief Operating Officer 11 Canada Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP: Zvi Halpern-Shavim & Shavone Bazarkewich 65 Dror Levy Group Consulting Editor 12 Croatia Čipčić-Bragadin and Associates in cooperation with Tax Advisory TUK Ltd.: Alan Falach Silvije Čipčić-Bragadin & Edo Tuk 71 Publisher 13 Cyprus Totalserve Management Limited: Petros Rialas & Marios Yenagrites 75 Rory Smith 14 Finland Waselius & Wist: Niklas Thibblin & Mona Numminen 81 Published by Global Legal Group Ltd. 15 France Tirard, Naudin: Maryse Naudin & Jean-Marc Tirard 87 59 Tanner Street 16 Germany P+P Pöllath + Partners: Michael Best & Nico Fischer 95 London SE1 3PL, UK Tel: +44 20 7367 0720 17 Greece Stavropoulos & Partners Law Office: Ioannis Stavropoulos & Fax: +44 20 7407 5255 Vasiliki Koukoulioti 103 Email: [email protected] URL: www.glgroup.co.uk 18 Iceland LEX Law Offices: Garðar Víðir Gunnarsson & Guðrún Lilja Sigurðardóttir 110 GLG Cover Design 19 India T. P. Ostwal & Associates LLP, Chartered Accountants: T. P. Ostwal & F&F Studio Design Siddharth Banwat 116 GLG Cover Image Source 20 Ireland Maples and Calder: Andrew Quinn & David Burke 123 iStockphoto 21 Italy Ludovici Piccone & Partners: Paolo Ludovici & Stefano Tellarini 129 Printed by Ashford Colour Press Ltd 22 Japan Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu: Shigeki Minami 136 November 2017 23 Kazakhstan SSH Advisors: Safkhan Shahmammadli & Jahangir Juraev 144 Copyright © 2017 Global Legal Group Ltd. 24 Kosovo Boga & Associates: Andi Pacani & Fitore Mekaj 151 All rights reserved No photocopying 25 Liechtenstein Sele Frommelt & Partners Attorneys at Law Ltd.: Heinz Frommelt 156 ISBN 978-1-911367-83-3 26 Malta Avanzia Taxand Limited: Walter Cutajar & Mary Anne Inguanez 162 ISSN 1743-3371 27 Mexico SMPS Legal: Ana Paula Pardo Lelo de Larrea & Alexis Michel 170 Strategic Partners 28 Mozambique VdA Vieira de Almeida: Samuel Almeida & Ana Raquel Costa 177 29 Nigeria Blackwood & Stone LP: Kelechi Ugbeva 183 30 Poland Domański Zakrzewski Palinka: Joanna Wierzejska & Tomasz Leszczewski 188 31 Portugal VdA Vieira de Almeida: Samuel Almeida & Bárbara Miragaia 195 32 Romania Dobrinescu Dobrev SCA: Luisiana Dobrinescu 201 33 Serbia MIM Law: Tanja Ungura 207 Continued Overleaf Further copies of this book and others in the series can be ordered from the publisher. Please call +44 20 7367 0720 Disclaimer This publication is for general information purposes only. It does not purport to provide comprehensive full legal or other advice. Global Legal Group Ltd. and the contributors accept no responsibility for losses that may arise from reliance upon information contained in this publication. This publication is intended to give an indication of legal issues upon which you may need advice. Full legal advice should be taken from a qualified professional when dealing with specific situations. WWW.ICLG.COM The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Corporate Tax 2018 Country Question and Answer Chapters: 34 Spain Cases & Lacambra: Ernesto Lacambra & Marc Montserrat 212 35 Switzerland Lenz & Staehelin: Pascal Hinny & Jean-Blaise Eckert 218 36 Turkey K&D Law Firm: Murat Bal & Ezgi Kumas 228 37 United Kingdom Slaughter and May: Zoe Andrews & William Watson 235 38 USA Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz: Jodi J. Schwartz & Swift S.O. Edgar 244 Chapter 11 Canada Zvi Halpern-Shavim Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP Shavone Bazarkewich 1 Tax Treaties and Residence 1.5 Are treaties overridden by any rules of domestic law (whether existing when the treaty takes effect or introduced subsequently)? 1.1 How many income tax treaties are currently in force in your jurisdiction? While domestic legislation generally does not override treaties, treaties are subject to the provisions of the Income Tax Conventions Canada currently has 93 treaties that are in force, four treaties that Interpretation Act (Canada) which, among other things, provides are signed but not yet in force, and seven treaties that are either that the general anti-avoidance rule in the Income Tax Act can apply under negotiation or re-negotiation. In addition, Canada currently to eliminate treaty benefits if it is determined that a tax treaty has has 22 tax information exchange agreements that are in force, two been abused. Canada’s tax treaties are generally also subject to a that are signed but not yet in force, and six under negotiation. general tax benefit rule (expressly included in many of Canada’s tax treaties) whereby a tax treaty will not be applied to deprive a 1.2 Do they generally follow the OECD Model Convention taxpayer of a benefit otherwise available under domestic tax law. or another model? Similarly, and as mentioned above, the principal purpose test that Canada will adopt for treaties covered by the MLI may operate Canada’s tax treaties generally follow the OECD model. to deny treaty benefits in certain circumstances. The MLI also contains a number of other provisions which would modify such 1.3 Do treaties have to be incorporated into domestic law treaties in order to implement other tax treaty measures contained before they take effect? in the BEPS Project. Treaties take effect once Parliament enacts legislation incorporating 1.6 What is the test in domestic law for determining the them into domestic law. residence of a company? 1.4 Do they generally incorporate anti-treaty shopping A corporation will be resident in Canada if it is incorporated under rules (or “limitation on benefits” articles)? the laws of Canada or a province, or if central management and control of the corporation is exercised in Canada, subject to the Canada’s tax treaty with the U.S. has a specific limitation on benefits application of certain deeming and tie-breaker rules contained in rule that is derived from the limitation of benefits rule in the U.S. Canada’s treaties and domestic law. model treaty. Additionally, some of Canada’s treaties have narrow limitation on benefits provisions, e.g., benefits are not available to 2 Transaction Taxes certain types of entities. On June 7, 2017, Canada signed the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion 2.1 Are there any documentary taxes in your jurisdiction? and Profit Shifting (MLI) which contains certain measures intended to address “treaty shopping”. Through the MLI, Canada’s tax There are no documentary taxes in Canada. treaties which are covered by the MLI will be amended, among other things, to incorporate (a) a stated intention for tax treaties to 2.2 Do you have Value Added Tax (or a similar tax)? If so, eliminate double taxation without creating opportunities for non- at what rate or rates? taxation or reduced taxation through tax evasion or avoidance (including through treaty-shopping arrangements), and (b) a Federal goods and services tax (GST) is a VAT that applies at a rate principal purpose test, which will operate to deny treaty benefits in of 5%. Some provinces have harmonised their provincial sales tax certain circumstances where a principal purpose of an arrangement base with the federal GST, resulting in a harmonised sales tax (HST) or transaction was to obtain a treaty benefit. with rates varying by province between 13%–15%. The province of Canada has also indicated that, where appropriate, it may seek Quebec imposes its own provincial VAT in addition to the 5% GST to negotiate on a bilateral basis a detailed limitation on benefits at a rate of 9.975%. provision with its treaty partners. ICLG TO: CORPORATE TAX 2018 WWW.ICLG.COM 65 © Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP Canada 2.3 Is VAT (or any similar tax) charged on all transactions 3.2 Would there be any withholding tax on royalties paid or are there any relevant exclusions? by a local company to a non-resident? VAT applies to nearly all supplies of property and services, but there Canada levies a 25% withholding tax on royalties paid by Canadian are exceptions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pressures for the Harmonization of Income Taxation Between Canada and the United States
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Canada-U.S. Tax Comparisons Volume Author/Editor: John B. Shoven and John Whalley, editors Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-75483-9 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/shov92-1 Conference Date: July 26-27, 1990 Publication Date: January 1992 Chapter Title: Pressures for the Harmonization of Income Taxation between Canada and the United States Chapter Author: Robin Boadway, Neil Bruce Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c7478 Chapter pages in book: (p. 25 - 74) 1 Pressures for the Harmonization of Income Taxation between Canada and the United States Robin Boadway and Neil Bruce 1.1 Introduction: The Question of Tax Harmonization The determination of tax policy is among the most sovereign functions of governments. The choices to be made include of the level of tax revenues to be collected (and hence the level of public sector spending), the economic activities to be taxed (the tax bases and the tax mix), the distribution of the tax burden over different groups and income classes in the country, and the distri- bution of the tax revenues to different levels of government in the country. From an economic point of view, there are a number of criteria that might be used in formulating tax policy. These include minimizing the burden on the population of raising the given amount of revenue, minimizing the administra- tive costs of the tax system both to the government and to the taxpayers, achieving the desired amount of income redistribution, increasing the stability and predictability of the revenue base, and using tax policy as an instrument of industrial and regional policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Tax Journal Revue Fiscale Canadienne
    2020 ■ VOLUME 68, No 4 CANADIAN TAX JOURNAL REVUE FISCALE CANADIENNE PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLES Interest Relief on Income Tax Debts: Canada Versus the United States Michael H. Lubetsky Tax Literacy: A Canadian Perspective Anthony Pham, Antoine Genest-Grégoire, Luc Godbout, and Jean-Herman Guay POLICY FORUM Crisis, Cleanup, and the Prospect of Long-Term Fiscal Change Shirley Tillotson Editors’ Introduction—The GST/HST Responsibilities of Non-Resident E-Commerce Firms Alan Macnaughton and Daniel Sandler The GST/HST Obligations of Non-Resident E-Commerce Firms— Jurisprudence and Policy Nicholas Shatalow Carrying On About Carrying On Business: A Response to “The GST/HST Obligations of Non-Resident E-Commerce Firms” Zvi Halpern-Shavim Much Ado About Doing Not Much: Some Reflections on the Jurisdiction To Tax Business Transactions Malcolm Gammie FEATURES Finances of the Nation: Provincial Debt Sustainability in Canada: Demographics, Federal Transfers, and COVID-19 Trevor Tombe Current Cases: (FCA) Iberville Developments Limited v. Canada; (FCA) Landbouwbedrijf Backx BV v. Canada; (BCCA) Collins Family Trust v. Canada (Attorney General) Kirsten Kjellander, Ryan L. Morris, John Sorensen, Ehsan Wahidie, and Anita Yuk Selected US Tax Developments: New Proposed Regulations Under the Section 1061 Carried Interest Rules Peter A. Glicklich and Gregg M. Benson Current Tax Reading Robin Boadway and Kim Brooks ■ CANADIAN TAX JOURNAL EDITORIAL BOARD/ COMITÉ DE RÉDACTION DE LA REVUE FISCALE CANADIENNE ■ Editors/Rédacteurs en chef Alan Macnaughton Daniel Sandler University of Waterloo EY Law llp Kevin Milligan (on leave) Frances Woolley University of British Columbia Carleton University ■ Practitioners and Academics/Fiscalistes et Universitaires Richard M. Bird University of Toronto Allison Christians McGill University David G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Individual and Tax Reform in Canada
    THE INDIVIDUAL AND TAX REFORM IN CANADA GORDON BALE* Kingston, Ont. The long-awaited White Paper entitled Proposals for Tax Reform' was released on November 7th, 1969. It is far more faithful to the Report of the Royal Commission on Taxation,' more fre- quently referred to as the Carter Report after its chairman, than was generally anticipated. Yet, in spite of this, the White Paper was generally received with equanimity and the stock market initially at least greeted it with enthusiasm.' This reaction is, in part, a result of the mass educational experience in the field of taxa- tion which was initiated by the Carter Report. It is a great tribute to the quality of the Carter Report. This lucid and bold work of scholarship prompted much controversy and debate. The compel- ling logic of the Report and the pre-eminent place accorded to equity appear to have prevailed over many of its critics. This was clearly illustrated by the predominantly cool and critical recep- tion which was accorded to the Report by the Senate Banking, Trade and Commerce Committee on the White Paper which was released in September, 1970.4 The Canadian public apparently expects to see some fundamental tax reform and will not be *Gordon Bale, of the Faculty of Law, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario. 1 Proposals for Tax Reform (Ottawa, Queen's Printer, 1969), herein- after cited as White Paper. 'Report of the Royal Commission on Taxation (Ottawa, Queen's Printer, 1966), hereinafter cited as Report. 'The Toronto Globe and Mail, November 11th, 1969, p. B14 reported that: "The largest price rise on record yesterday sent stocks on the Toronto Stock Exchange to their highest level since June 10th.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Perspectives on Basic Income
    Islamic Perspectives on Basic Income Abdullah Al-Shami and Katherine Bullock Abstract This article presents Islamic perspectives on the concept of Basic Income, and examines its emergence with the first Islamic society established at the time of the Prophet Muhammad. The scope of this research is to provide a historical account of Islamic society’s and Qur’anic foundations of social justice; to provide Islamic defi- nitions of the concepts involved in the Basic Income debate (such as wealth, poverty, and work); and to discuss the Islamic approach to Basic Income. Finally, the research will consider Islamic perspec- tives on the role of charity and the use of natural resources as sourc- es of revenue to fund Basic Income. Introduction: Provision of Basic Income and Islamic Approaches As governments strive to address growing inequality, the shortcomings of the welfare state, technological challenges to the labor-force, the rise of the precariat, and the changing nature of work in the twenty-first century, the Abdullah Al-Shami is a Professor of Arabic and Islamic Studies and now research fellow at The Tessellate Institute, a non-profit research institute in Canada. He -ob tained his ILB in Islamic Law, ILM Degree in Comparative Islamic Jurisprudence from Saudi Arabia, and PhD in Comparative Islamic Jurisprudence from the Uni- versity of Manchester, UK. He has written and edited over ten books and over 60 research articles on Islamic Law and Islamic Studies. Katherine Bullock, Research Advisor at The Tessellate Institute, received her PhD in political science from the University of Toronto (1999). She is a Lecturer in the Department of Political Science, University of Toronto at Mississauga.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Are There Tax Havens?
    William & Mary Law Review Volume 52 (2010-2011) Issue 3 Article 5 December 2010 Why Are There Tax Havens? Adam H. Rosenzweig Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr Part of the Tax Law Commons Repository Citation Adam H. Rosenzweig, Why Are There Tax Havens?, 52 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 923 (2010), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol52/iss3/5 Copyright c 2010 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr WHY ARE THERE TAX HAVENS? ADAM H. ROSENZWEIG* ABSTRACT Recently, the issue of tax havens has risen to the fore of the fiscal policy debate, with tax havens being singled out as the root cause of many of the fiscal shortfalls plaguing the governments of the world. Surprisingly, however, although there has been a fair amount of literature on why tax havens are harmful to the modern interna- tional tax regime, which countries become tax havens, and what means are available to combat tax havens, there has been less written specifically on the underlying question of why, notwithstanding all these points, tax havens exist in the first place, or why they persist in the face of such overwhelming criticism. This Article will fill that gap by directly confronting the question: why are there tax havens? To this end, this Article will propose for the first time that the focus of the international tax laws of wealthier countries, such as the United States, on capital neutrality—or making the flow of capital across borders easier and cheaper—can actually create or exacerbate the incentives necessary for poorer countries to act as tax havens.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Client 2018 7Th Edition
    TheICLG International Comparative Legal Guide to: Private Client 2018 7th Edition A practical cross-border insight into private client work Published by Global Legal Group, in association with CDR, with contributions from: Aird & Berlis LLP Maples and Calder Alon Kaplan, Advocate and Notary Law Office Matheson Aronson, Ronkin-Noor, Eyal Law Firm Miller Thomson LLP Arqués Ribert Junyer – Advocats MJM Limited Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP Mori Hamada & Matsumoto Bircham Dyson Bell LLP Mourant Ozannes Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP New Quadrant Partners Limited DORDA Rechtsanwälte GmbH O’Sullivan Estate Lawyers LLP Griffiths & Partners and Coriats Trust Company Limited Ospelt & Partner Attorneys at Law Ltd. Hassans International Law Firm P+P Pöllath + Partners Higgs & Johnson Rovsing & Gammeljord Holland & Knight LLP Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP) Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP Spenser & Kauffmann Attorneys at Law Khaitan & Co Studio Tributario Associato Facchini Rossi & Soci (FRS) Lebenberg Advokatbyrå AB Tirard, Naudin, Société d’avocats Lenz & Staehelin Vieira de Almeida Loyens & Loeff Withers Bergman LLP Macfarlanes LLP Zepos & Yannopoulos The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Private Client 2018 General Chapters: 1 BREXIT: The Immigration Implications – James Perrott, Macfarlanes LLP 1 2 Keep Calm and Carry On: The Increasing UK Regulatory and Tax Issues Facing Offshore Trustees – Matthew Braithwaite & Helen Ratcliffe, Bircham Dyson Bell LLP 11 3 Pre-Immigration Planning Considerations for the HNW Client – Think
    [Show full text]
  • The Compliance and Administrative Costs of Taxation in Canada, Is Especially Welcomed
    Studies in Tax Policy April 2013 The Compliance and Administrative Costs by François Vaillancourt, Édison Roy-César, of Taxation in Canada and Maria Silvia Barros Foreword by Anthony Ariganello CPA (DE), FCGA, President and Chief Executive Officer, CGA-Canada fraserinstitute.org Contents Foreword / iii Executive summary / vii Introduction / 1 Part 1 The compliance costs incurred by individuals / 3 1.1 Compliance costs for personal income taxes / 4 1.2 Compliance Costs for Individuals for Property Tax / 40 Part 2 The compliance costs incurred by businesses / 45 2.1 The costs for Canadian business of complying with the 2007 tax system— a multivariate analysis using CFIB data / 46 2.2 Compliance costs of the Canadian tax system—evidence for large firms in 2009 / 60 Part 3 Overall compliance and administrative costs of taxes in Canada, 2007 / 85 3.1 Complicance costs of taxes / 86 3.2 Administrative costs / 89 Part 4 Estimates for 2011 / 93 4.1 Personal income tax compliance cost / 94 4.2 Personal property tax compliance cost / 95 4.3 Business tax compliance cost / 96 4.4 Total tax compliance costs / 97 4.5 Administrative costs of taxes / 98 4.6 Total compliance and administrative costs, 2011 / 99 Appendices and References / 101 A Methodology used in survey / 102 B The questionnaire for individuals (English version) / 104 C Regression used in calculating market wage / 114 D The questionnaire for firms (English version) / 116 References / 125 About the authors and publication / 129 fraserinstitute.org/ i ii / fraserinstitute.org Anthony Ariganello, CPA (DE), FCGA is President and Chief Executive Officer, CGA-Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Allocating Taxable Income for Provincial Corporate Income Taxation in Canada, 2015-2017: Practice and Analysis
    PUBLICATIONS SPP Briefing Paper Volume 14:3 January 2021 ALLOCATING TAXABLE INCOME FOR PROVINCIAL CORPORATE INCOME TAXATION IN CANADA, 2015-2017: PRACTICE AND ANALYSIS Michael Smart and François Vaillancourt SUMMARY Canada has used the same two-factor formula with a 50-50 weighting for the allocation of taxable income between provinces for 61 years. The intra-country formula allocation (FA) was developed when natural resource extraction and manufacturing were more important in economic activity than now. The FA thus may need to be updated to reflect a changing 21st century economy. Canadian provinces set their own tax rates, while most use the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) to collect corporate income tax (CIT). This paper examines the differences in the provinces’ CIT rates for some recent years, and what might happen if the formula were changed, particularly when companies operating in more than one jurisdiction pay taxes according to varying provincial rates. Businesses operating in more than one jurisdiction accounted for an average share of total revenue of 42 per cent in 2014-2016. In 2011, there were 23,810 such businesses in Canada, making up 2.3 per cent of the total number of businesses and 43.4 per cent of all employees. If a business operates in several provinces, then provincial governments split the taxable corporate income using the FA mechanism. There are 10 rules for the mechanism, depending on specific business sectors. http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v14i.70658 www.policyschool.ca A new formula could be based on one of three that U.S. states use.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Taxation of Business and Investment Income of Non-Residents
    CANADIAN TAXATION OF BUSINESS AND INVESTMENT INCOME OF NON - RESIDENTS by ROCCO BONZANIGO Licencie en Droit de l'Universite de Geneve, 1969 Avocat au Barreau de Geneve, Switzerland, 1971 a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF LAWS in the Department of LAW We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard The University of British Columbia May, 1972 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of LAW The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada Date May. 1972 (i) ABSTRACT Canadian Taxation of Business and Investment Income of Non-Residents The new Income Tax Act (S.C. 1970-71, c.63), formely known as Bill C-259, has introduced important changes and many new rules into Canadian legislation, which affect taxation of non-residents. This thesis is a study of the tax treatment which the new law imposes on non-residents and an examination of the differences from the previous system. However, taxation of non-residents depends not only on statutes but also on case law. Therefore, attention is devoted to judicial decisions to ascertain whether they conflict with the new statutory provisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Taxes in Canada at the University of Ottawa
    Issue Summary | May 2015 ECONOMY-WIDE AND EMERGING ISSUES Sustainable Prosperity is a national research and policy network, based Environmental Taxes in Canada at the University of Ottawa. SP focuses on market-based approach- es to build a stronger, greener, more competitive economy. It brings together business, policy and Key Messages academic leaders to help innovative ideas inform policy development. • Environmental taxes are policy mechanisms designed to increase the price on activities and products that are harmful to the environment. Environmental taxes Sustainable Prosperity are found in economies around the world and are levied on bases such as energy, University of Ottawa transportation, natural resources and pollution. 1 Stewart St, 3rd floor Ottawa, ON K1N 7M9 (613) 562-5800 ext. 2371 • While the balance sheets of Canadian federal and provincial budgets reflect some [email protected] use of environmental taxes, a consistent methodology for identifying, categorizing and calculating such pricing policies has not been identified. This Issue Summary is based on the research paper entitled, “Setting a • The lack of a consistent methodology may be partly due to unclear definitions of Baseline: A Primer for Environmental environmental taxes, as these definitions vary in theory and in practice. In Taxes in Canada” by Pomme Arros. The paper is available on the theory, environmental taxes limit environmentally harmful behaviour through a Sustainable Prosperity website at: price incentive. In practice however, many taxes labelled as environmental are www.sustainableprosperity.ca strictly revenue-raising tools that are not designed to provide any environmental benefit. The calculation of environmental taxes can be easily misinterpreted Responsibility for this Issue based on these definitional complexities.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget 2020 – Tax Policy Issues for Consideration
    Deloitte LLP Bay Adelaide Centre, East Tower 8 Adelaide Street West Suite 200 Toronto ON M5H 0A9 Canada Tel: 416-643-8753 Fax: 416-601-6703 www.deloitte.ca January 9, 2020 The Honourable William F. Morneau Minister of Finance Department of Finance Canada 90 Elgin Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G5 Dear Minister Morneau, Budget 2020 – tax policy issues for consideration We believe that Budget 2020 will provide the Government with an opportunity to drive business performance and improve economic prosperity for all Canadians. As discussed in Deloitte’s most recent quarterly Economic outlook,1 Canada’s economy has experienced growth in 2019, but continued growth may be challenging going forward amid global economic uncertainty. To achieve a better outcome, Canada must boost the economy’s potential to sustain stronger growth over the long-run. As Deloitte has highlighted in its past research, this is ultimately about improving our competitiveness, productivity and innovation. In addition to the risk of a weakening economy, businesses today are facing a frenetic pace of technological change which is also changing the economic landscape. To be successful in this turbulent environment, is it crucial to ensure that Canada’s economy is built on strong fundamentals and is productive and adaptable. The Government already has a number of important initiatives underway to protect Canada’s economy from emerging challenges. The Government should continue—and in fact accelerate and expand—its efforts to diversify trading relationships, reduce barriers to foreign investment and invest in infrastructure by complementing public funds with private capital. These efforts are essential and should remain areas of focus for Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxation in Québec: Favourable Measures for Foster Investement 2017
    TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 3 1. TAX SYSTEM ........................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 CARRYING ON BUSINESS ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 NON-RESIDENT INCOME TAX ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 INVESTMENT CANADA ACT .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 2. CORPORATE TAXATION ........................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 TAXABLE INCOME .......................................................................................................................................................................4 2.2 TAX RATES ................................................................................................................................................................................5 2.3 OPERATING LOSSES ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]