<<

THE JOURNAL OF I NVESTIGATI VE DERMATOLOGY Vol. 60, No. G Copy rig h t@ 1973 by The Will iams & Wilkins Co. Printed in U.S.A.

MOLECULAR ASPECTS OF GENETIC RECOMBINATION AND THEIR RELEVANCE TO CUTANEOUS * D. MARTIN CARTER, M.D., PH.D. t

INTRODUCTION spaced. In " fin e-structure" mapping, recom bina­ Through ge netic recombination, a fundam ental tiO n fr equency is considered a fu nction of t he biologic process t hat reassorts linked ue netic distance between recombining markers (Benze r, markers, offspring can ex press ge netic traits t hat 1961 ). Genetic maps actuall y re present t he linear were not present together in either parent. Ind i­ structure of t he DNA molec ule. T he agreement vidual progeny may be mult ice llul ar orua nisms between ge netic maps a nd t he physical distance single s, , , or molebc ul es oi· along t he DNA mo lecul e is ve ry high in bacteria DNA. To medical biologists, recombination is and bacteriophage (Hogness et al. , 1966). At t he usually identifi ed with the process of crossin rr-ove r present t ime, recombination data from hi rr her in w hic h genetic material i s exchanged b etween are much less helpful in definin ub t he homologous durinu . Genetic process in molecul ar terms. T his may r e fl ect~ less recombination is now f elt to bhave even wid er precise knowledge of eukaryotic significa n ce, having been implicated in such di­ structure regarding t he li near red upl ication of verse biologic phenomena as the circul ari zation of and whether all DNA is fun ctional (Call an, the b acteri al chromosome before repli cation t he 1967; T homas, 1970). It wo uld be naiv e to assume of t he DNA of temperate viruses' in to t hat all organisms perform recombination in an host D A , DNA-mediated b acteri al transforma­ identical m a nner, a nd distinctions between organ­ tion , and as t he ge neral m eans by whi ch ue netic Isms have a lready been delineated. However it var iability is generated (see reviews by Bodmer is ge nerally assumed that t he mechanism f or 'all and Darlington, 1969; Davern , 1971). recombination events, in all , preserves many co mmon features. Whatever m odel is de­ FUNCTION IN RECOMBINATION: A REFLECTION vised f or r eco mbination, it must accoun t for at OF DNA STRUCTURE least t':"o characteristic features of t he process: synapsts, the a li gnment or pai ring of homologous U nderstanding t he organi zation of t he DNA chromosome segments; and exchange, t he recom­ molecule, we can co rre late rather precisely t h e bining o f information h eld in DNA of t he homo­ chemical structure of the materi al storinu ue netic logs . information with some of t he ge netic e~e~1ts af­ fecting t he ex pression of t his information . BREAKING AN D HEJOINI NG VERSUS COPY CHOICE Chromosomes, which co ntain ge nes in a linear For many years, two array, are composed primarily o f D NA. The well ­ classic t heori es for recom­ b~nati o n vied for acceptance . Breaking known dou ble heli x can be depicted in a number and joining of homologous molec of ways (Fig. 1). Repeating spirals can s imulate ul es. a t heo ry origin all y pro­ posed b y J anssens ( the t hree-dimensiona l structure o f t he ri gid DNA 1909), was proposed to explain cytologic observations of m molec ule (la), or the molecule can be opened-out eiotic chi asmata. J ans­ sens suggested t hat chr diagrammaticall y, to reveal t he covalently linkecl omoso mal coiling produced sufficient tension to suga r-phos phate " backbone" of each strand and break and that homologs rejoined to the h ydrogen-bonded pairs of nucleotides holdinu produce reciprocally recom­ binan t proge the t wo strands together ( 1c). Further abbrev i a~ ny. J anssens' model could not ade­ quately account for t tion can reduce a diagram of t he DNA molecul e to he pa iring of DNA molecules; but even more t roubleso me, since two lines with cross-li nks (1b). Each of t hese chromosome s ize is constant, was diagrams s hows t hat t h"e intact molec ul e co ntains its require ment t hat a me­ chani cal process should two complementary polynucleotide c hains of op­ produce breaking o f ho­ mologous chromatids at prec isely t h posite pol a rity held together b y hydrogen b onds. e same in ter­ nucleot id e sites. _Ge net ic. ma ps _have been constructed f or many Another model, known as copy microrganisms from studies of t he freq uency choice was ori gin all y s uggested b y Belling (1931). He !'inked with which r ecombinant progeny occur in crosses recombination wi t h chromosome repli catio between parents with all eli c markers at adjacent n so that only the in fo rmation of both parents, but not or far-spaced sites on t he c hromosome. There is t he actual parental D NA , would be linked in the less crossing over between located close DNA of recombinant pr togeth er t han b etween t hose more distantly ogeny. T he model suggests that an , DNA polymerase, cha nges pa­ This work was s upported in part by USP HS Grant. rental template when synthesizin g re co mbina nt ·a. ROl C A 12496-01. molecul es. T he major difference between these . • From t h e D epartment or Derm atology, Ya le Uni ve r­ stty School of Med1c1ne, New Have n, Co nn ecticut . two models is t he importance attached to DNA . t Howard Hughes Medi cal Investigator, Yale Uni ve r­ repli cation: t he co py c hoice t heo ry is completely Si ty. dependent upon DNA replication wh ereas t he 369 370 THE JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY

(a) 3' 5' (b) 5' 3' cha ins; (2) pairing homologous segmen ts; (3) repairing t he recombina nt molecule by trimming excess DNA a nd fill ing in missing sequen ces; a nd (4) closing t he polynucleotide chain (Table I ). The a bove should be viewed as t he sine qua non of recombination but not necessarily a ll t he steps fo r whi ch every conceivabl e molecular m odel must m ake provision . 3' 5' ® 5' for Breahing and J oining le i ® ,--(" (d) p~ :: ~® The growin g number of enzymes from variou biologic systems t hat are capable of acting upon ®Y)----@ : : c ,-{"" r .. ~® different kinds of DNA s ubstrates (Richardson . 1969) provides t he tools with which molecula r ®~ :: tB-C(® model building can proceed. Acting under their specified condit ions upon the backbone of t he ,---{" ®~c ::~-· ® DNA molecul e, the various nucleases, polymer­ 5' ® ases, a nd li gases can break or rejoin the suga r­ 3' 5' phosphate linkages between adjacent nucleotides FIG. l. Diagramatic representations o f the double (Fig. 2) . Table I shows how t hese enzymic acti\'i­ helic al structure of DNA . A = adenine, T = thymine, G ties might contribute to recombination b y brea k­ = guanine, C = cytosin e; 5' and 3' refer to the polarity of ing a nd rejoining. Figure 3 represents the kind of the suga r-ph os phate backbone. theorizing engaged in by a number of con tempo­ rary biologists (e.g., Thomas, 1966; Meselson. breaking a nd joining theory is not. M eselson and 1967; a nd Whitehouse, 1968). others using de nsity gradient techniques demon­ The sorts of enzymi c properties required for strated t h at recombinant progeny of phage recombination b y breaking a nd rejoining mig h t be la mbda can be composed almost ent irely of pa­ expected to participate in other biologic processes ren tal materia l (Meselson and Weigle, 1961; Kel­ affecting D NA. Best known of these are DNA lenberger et aL, 1961) and clearl y establi shed that re plication and t he repair of injuries to DNA recombina nt progeny DN A m olecules can be pro­ induced by ult raviolet light . Among t he fi rst duced by t he breaking and rejoining of parental recom bination-defective mutants iden tified for E. D N A. S ubsequent studies of phage lambda co li were those fr om a g roup of organisms excep­ showed that extens ive new DNA synthesis can tionally sensit ive to irradia tion by ul traviolet light also accompa ny breaking a nd rejoining in recom­ (Howa rd -Fla nders a nd Theriot, 1966). Among t he bination (Stahl a nd Stahl, 197 1). few enzymes known to be required for recombina­ t ion are those listed in Table II. These have b een THE H YBRID OVERLAP AND id ent ifi ed from careful genetic a n d biochemical Breaking a nd joining of DNA can t hus explain evaluation of recombination defective mutant m t he exchange step in recombination, but what several microorganis ms . m echanism has sufficient precision to keep the m olecular size of progeny molecules constant? The Reco mbination Enzym es of Phage Lambda What permits the prec ise pairing of DNA in The clearest data establis hing a certain enzymic syn a psis before excha nge? Double-stranded DNA activity with recombination h ave been gath ered molecules would not be expected to ali gn chemi­ for phage la mbda . The structural genes specifying cally, but t he pairing o f comple men tary, s ingle la mbda exonuclease a nd beta protein m ap di­ strands of portions of homologous molecul es might rectly in the recombination (rec) loci on t he phage offer t he precision required for promoting recom­ chromosome (Shulman et al. , 1970). The biologic bination events t hat produce progeny o f uniform properties o!' beta protein re ma in unknown. T he size. S upport ing t his expectation is t he c he mical a nd genetic id entification of a heterozygous, bi­ TABLE I parental area called the hybrid overlap region in Possible s teps in genetic reco mbination the progeny of several species of microbial recom­ bination events (see Bodmer a nd Darlington, Step Enzyme 1969). a. breakage end onuclease STEPS IN RECOMBINATION b. pai rin g exonuclease c. repairing Reduced to its minimal elements, recombina­ 1) trimming exo nu clease or endo- tion by breakage and rejoining requires at least 4 nuclease steps for the incorporation of n ew information and 2) filling polymerase the restoration of the recombina nt molecul e o f d. closing li gase DNA: ( 1) breaking t he parental polynucleotide GENETIC RECOMBINATION 371

(a) Endonuclease one at a t ime (Carter and Radding, 197 1). The enzyme binds to but cannot hydrolyze DN A at \_ in tern al in terrupt ions (ni cks o r gaps) in D A • (Radding a nd Carter, 197 1). These propert ies led I I I I I I I - ll II II to t he proposal of a model for t he role o f la mbda exonuclease in ge netic recombination that seems (b) Exonuclease to have been co nfirmed (Cassuto and Radding, -...... 1971) . The importance of t he work is t hat it approximates reco mbination in vitro a nd shows • I I II I I I - IIIII t he a bili ty of lambda exonuclease to perform two tasks in recombination (Fig. 4). Since t he e nzy me (c) ON A Polymerase T ABLE II I. Enzymes clearly associated with genetic recombination I I - II IIIII Enzy me (d) Polynucleotide ligase E. coli AT P -dependent nuclease Buttin and Wright ( 1968) Barbour and Clark ( 1970) n• Ill I I 1111111 Oishi (1969 ) - Phage T -4 Gene 32 binding protein F IG. 2. E nzymes that act upon D NA substrates to Alberts (1968) break a nd rejoin the s ugar-phosphate linkages of the Phage la mbda Exonu Backbo n e. e = enzyme. clease and beta protein S hulman et al. (1970) (a) 3' (b) ' , T"lllrrl ,.,1 I'TTII,..,II"Tll l-rriiTTI I-rrll 3 -rlll\\lrrrrr-llrTI TTII.-IIn-1 5 5' ..L.LLL..LO Exo nuc lease prepares fragme nts of DNA for 3 - 3· ~~ rejoininQ by base pairinQ : •• '11 1 Ill!I l [!!Till 5 5' ~ exo DNA . fraQment Ql!t!! l !il l l! i ltillil/ll! i li i lll i ll!l! l ll l l!l!l 3 ' - 3 ' (c) ;. ~ 11 111111111 Ill lllllllllllll ll lli l 1ii!illlill0 3' DNA fraQmen t exo s' ~a Qtlllllllllllllllllllil (e) 3' (f) 3' , rrrlllJrrn[[ [-rrr[]] 1([0J i lllli!l!!!!l!!lll!!ll!l!ii!!Q s' lJIIlllLJirn + 5

(g) 3' l (h) 3' • ,...II"'l llrnllrrlllrrrlI]J]JJ ! be s' J I I1 !II 1111111111 5 F IG. 3 . A hy pothetical general model for reco mbina­ II II II l tion by breaking a nd joining wi th some new DNA lllllllllllljj;j;j'j;i!lc)nrll •I I(~II II II II synth esis . ( a) Two homologo us DNA m olec ul es ; (b) 1 icks a re introduced at non -id entical n earby sites by endonuclease (0); (c) sin gle strands " unwind "' from l d each molecule and homologs pair as DNA polymerase (e ) acts at nicks; (d ) endonuclease (0) acts again at one a nd n i cks are re c oQnized as a siQna l for site on eac h p a rent producing one reco mbinant (e) and the enzyme to stop. two fragm e n ts t hat pair to produce an additional recom­ bi nan t (f). R epa ir with poly merase a nd li gase gives two intact r ecom binants (g) and (h). i l l ! I I! Ill! I II! illliiilli !l I I Qurrrrt Iiiii I tQttllll!il I

FIG. 4. A model for the role of la mbda e:

xeroderma pi gmen tosum . Nature (Lond.) , Esc her£cia coli K-12 defective in DNA repair and in 228:359- 361. genetic recombination. , 53: 1137. Alberts, B. M ., Am odio, F. J ., Jenkins, M., Gutman, E. Janssens, F. A. (1 909). La T heori e de Ia Chiasmatypie. D ., and F erris, F. L. (1968). Studies with DNA-cel­ Cellule, 25:389- 411. lulose chromatography. l. DNA-bind in g proteins Ka lckar, H. M., Anderson, E. P .. and lsselbacher. K. J. from . Cold Spring Harbor Symp. (1956). Galactosemia, a conge ni tal defect in a nu­ Quant. Bi oi. , 33:289- 305. cleotid e t ra nsferase. Biochim. Biophys . Acta, Barbour, S.D., and Clark, A. J . (1970) . Bioc hemical and 20.·262- 268. gen etic studies of recombination profi ciency in E. Kellenberger, G., Zichichi , M. L. , a nd Weigle, J. J . col i . I . Enzymic activity associated with rec B and (196 1). Exchange of DNA in the recombination of rec C genes. Proc. Nat\. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 65:955- bacteriophage lambda. Proc. Nat!. Acad. Sci. 961. U.S.A ., 47:869- 878 . Belling, J. (1931) . Chromomeres of liliaceous plants. M erril, C. R. , Geier, M. R. , and Petricciani , J. C. (1971 ). U niv . Cali f. (Berkeley) Pub\. Botany, /6:153- 170. Bacterial vi rus ge ne ex pression in human ce ll s. Benzer, S . (1961). On the topography of the l{enetic fin e Nature (Lond .) , 233:398- 400. stru cture. Proc. Nat!. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., Meselson, M. (1967). T he molecular basis of genetic 47:403- 415. recombination. In: Heritage from Mendel (ed. by Bodmer, W. F., and Darlington, A. J . (1969). Linkage Brink, R. A.). University of Wisconsin Press, Madi­ a nd r ecombination at the molecular level. In : Ge­ son and London, pp. 81- 104. netic Orfianization (ed. by Caspari, E . W. , and Meselson, M. , and Weigle, J. (1961). Chromo ome Rav in, A. W. ). Academ ic Press, New York and breakage accompanying ge netic recombination in London, p. 223. bacteri ophage. Proc. Nat!. Acad. Sci. U.S.A .. B u ttin, G., and Wright, M. (1968). Enzy matic DNA 47:857- 868 . d egr a d ation in E. coli: Its relationship to synthetic Murray, R. F'., Jr., Hobbs, J., and Payne, B. (1971). processes at the c hro mosome level. Cold Spri ng Possible clonal ori gin of common warts (Verruca Harbor Symp. Quant. Bioi. , 33:259- 269 . uu. lgaris). Nature (Lond.), 232:51. Callan, H. G. ( I967 ). T h'e organization of genetic units in Oishi , M. (1969). An ATP-dependent deoxyribonuclease chromosomes. J. Cell Sci., 2: 1- 7. from Esc hericia coli with a possible role in genetic Carter , D. M . (197 1). Studies on t he role o f the exonu­ recombination. Proc. Nat!. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., c lease of b acteriophage lambda in ge neti c recombi­ 64:1292- 1299. n ati o n . Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Radding, C. M ., and Carter, D. M. (1971). T he role of Graduate Schoo l of Ya le University in Candidacy exonuclease a nd beta protein of phage lambda in for t h e Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ge netic recombination. Ill. Binding to deoxyribonu­ Carter, D. M., and Radding, C. M. (1971). The role o f cleic acid. J . Bioi. Chem., 246:2513- 2518. exonuclease and beta protein of phage la mbda in Ri chardson, C. C. (1969). Enzymes in DNA metaboli m. gen etic recom bination. ll. Substrate specificity a nd Annu. Rev . Biochem .. 38:795. t h e mode of action of la m bda exonuclease. J . Bioi. Shulm an, M. J., Ha lli ck, L. M., Echols. H. , and Signer, C h e rn. , 246:2502- 25 12. E . R. ( 1970). Properties of recombination-deficient Cassu to, E ., and Radding, C. M. (1971). Mecha ni sm for mutants of bacteri ophage lambda. J. Mol. Bioi., t h e action of lambda exonuclease in ge netic recom­ 52:50 1-520. b inatio n . Nature (New Bioi. ), 229:13- 16. Stahl, F. W., a nd Stahl, M. M. (1971). DNA synthes is Cleaver, J. E . (1968) . Defective repair replication of associated with reco mbination in phage la mbda. Tl . DNA in xeroderma pigmentosum. Nature (Lond.), Recombination between immunity-repressed chro­ 218:652-656. mosomes. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Bioi. , Cleaver. J. E. (1969) . Xeroderma pigmentosum: A (ln press.) huma n disease in which a n initial st.age of DNA re­ T homas, C. A. , Jr. (1966). Recombination of DNA pair is defective. Proc . Nat!. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., molecules. Progr. Res. Mol. Bioi. , 63:428- 435 . 5:315- 337 . Davern, C . l. (1971) . Molecula r aspects of genetic T homas, C. A .. Jr., Hamkalo, B. A., Misra, D. N., and recombination. Progr. Nucleic Ac id Res. Mol. Bioi. , Lee, C. S. (1970). Cyclization of eucaryotic deox­ 11:229- 258. yri bonucleic acid fragments. J. Mol. Bioi., Hogness, D . S. , Doe rfler, W., Egan, J., and Black, L. 5 /:621-632. (1966). T he posit ion and ori entation of ge nes in Whitehouse, H. L . (1 968) . Towards an Understanding of lambda a nd lambda dg DNA. Co ld S pring Harbor the Mechanisms of H eredity (2nd Edition). St. Symp. Quant. Bioi., 31:129- 138. Martins Press, New York. Howard-Fl anders, P., and Theri ot, L. (1966). Mutants of