On Entomopathogenic Nematodes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On Entomopathogenic Nematodes ON ENTOMOPATHOGENIC NEMATODES (RHABDITIDA: STEINERNEMATIDAE AND HETERORHABDITIDAE): A POTENTIAL REARING HOST, BLACK SOLDIER FLY HERMETIA ILLUCENS (L.) (DIPTERA: STRATIOMYIDAE) AND COMPATIBILITY WITH A PREDATORY BEETLE, DALOTIA CORIARIA (KRAATZ) (COLEOPTERA: STAPHYLINIDAE) By Joseph S. Tourtois A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirments for the degree of Entomology – Master of Science 2014 ABSTRACT ON ENTOMOPATHOGENIC NEMATODES (RHABDITIDA: STEINERNEMATIDAE AND HETERORHABDITIDAE): A POTENTIAL REARING HOST, BLACK SOLDIER FLY HERMETIA ILLUCENS (L.) (DIPTERA: STRATIOMYIDAE) AND COMPATIBILITY WITH A PREDATORY BEETLE, DALOTIA CORIARIA (KRAATZ) (COLEOPTERA: STAPHYLINIDAE) By Joseph S. Tourtois Entomopathogenic nematodes (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae) are soil-dwelling insect parasitic round worms used in augmentative biological control to manage western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and fungus gnats Bradysis spp. (Diptera: Sciaridae) in greenhouses. Reducing production costs is one way of increasing their adoption by growers. Black soldier fly larvae Hermetia illucens (L.) (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) are evaluated as a potential nematode rearing host. They are not highly susceptible to entomopathogenic nematodes; however, damaging the cuticle before and after infection increases mortality rate, infection rate, nematode entry, and nematode emergence. Even with modification, black soldier fly larvae produce only 10% of the nematodes produced on the standard rearing host Galleria mellonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). The soil-dwelling predatory rove beetle Dalotia coriaria (Kraatz) (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) is also used to manage populations of western flower thrips and fungus gnats. Its compatibility with entomopathogenic nematodes is evaluated in a laboratory bioassay. Dalotia coriaria appears to be most compatible with Steinernema feltiae (Filipjev) (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank my major professor Dr. Matthew Grieshop for all of his encouragement and advice over the past four years I spent in the Organic Pest Management Laboratory. I thank my committee members Dr. Zsofia Szendrei and Dr. John Biernbaum for their guidance and approval. I am grateful for Dr. Anne Nielsen, Nate Walton, Pete Nelson, and Dr. David Shapiro-Ilan. They provided support in rearing and working with entomopathogenic nematodes. I appreciate Morgan Burnette, Yvonne Millar, Paul Owen-Smith, Mirijam Garske, and other numerous undergraduate students who spent countless hours counting nematodes, dissecting black soldier fly, and assessing insect mortality. Without their hard work, this project would not have been finished in a timely manner. I also thank Brad Baughman and Emily Pochubay for being excellent role models. Lastly, I need to thank my wife Krys Tourtois for all of her support and understanding. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................... VI LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... VII CHAPTER 1. LITERATURE REVIEW ....................................................................... 1 Biological Control .................................................................................................................. 1 Augmentative Biological Control ..................................................................................... 2 Limitations to application of augmentative Biological control ............................. 4 Economics ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Intraguild Predation ........................................................................................................................... 5 Compatibility with other management strategies ................................................................ 6 Entomopathogenic Nematodes and D. coriaria in Biological control .................. 6 Entomopathogenic Nematodes ........................................................................................ 7 Biology ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Life Cycle ............................................................................................................................................... 11 Applications ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Rearing ................................................................................................................................................... 13 In vivo rearing .................................................................................................................................. 13 In vitro rearing ................................................................................................................................. 14 Alternative Rearing Host ................................................................................................................ 14 Black Soldier Fly ................................................................................................................. 15 Biology .................................................................................................................................................... 15 History .................................................................................................................................................... 16 Potential Benefits .............................................................................................................................. 16 Potential Limitations ........................................................................................................................ 17 Dalotia coriaria (Kraatz) (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) .......................................... 18 History .................................................................................................................................................... 18 Biology .................................................................................................................................................... 18 Life Cycle ............................................................................................................................................... 19 Feeding habits ..................................................................................................................................... 19 Rearing ................................................................................................................................................... 20 Compatibility with nematodes ..................................................................................................... 21 Thesis OBjectives ................................................................................................................ 22 CHAPTER 2. EXPLORING THE USE OF BLACK SOLDIER FLY HERMETIA ILLUCENS (L.) (DIPTERA: STRATIOMYIDAE) AS AN IN VIVO ENTOMOPATHOGENIC NEMATODE REARING HOST ........................................................................................................ 23 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 23 iv Methods and Materials ..................................................................................................... 26 Black Soldier Fly colony .................................................................................................................. 26 Entomopathogenic Nematode colonies ................................................................................... 27 Experiment 1a – black soldier fly susceptibility by larval stage ................................... 28 Experiment 1b – black soldier fly susceptibility at pupal stage .................................... 29 Statistical Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 30 Experiment 2 –effect of larval injury on nematode infection ......................................... 30 Statistical Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 32 Experiment 3 – nematode production in black soldier fly .............................................. 32 Statistical Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 34 Results ................................................................................................................................... 36 Experiment 1a – black soldier fly susceptibility by larval stage ................................... 36 Experiment 1b – black soldier fly susceptibility at pupal stage .................................... 38 Experiment 2 – effect of larval injury on nematode infection ........................................ 40 Experiment 3 – nematode production ..................................................................................... 45 Discussion ............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Nora M. Bello, Phd
    Nora M. Bello, PhD, DVM Curriculum Vitae updated as of 08/14/2020 002 Dickens Hall E-mail: [email protected] Department of Statistics http://www.k-state.edu/stats/people/bello.html Kansas State University https://norabello.weebly.com Manhattan, KS 66506, USA EDUCATION Doctor of Philosophy 2010 Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI Dissertation title: “Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling of Heterogeneity in the Relationship between Milk Production and Reproductive Performance in Dairy Cows”. Emphasis on methodological development and implementation of hierarchical Bayesian multivariate statistical models for heterogeneous covariances. Advisor: Dr. Robert J. Tempelman, Professor Master of Science, Applied Statistics 2008 Department of Statistics and Probability Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI Master of Science, Animal Science 2006 Department of Animal Science Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI Thesis Title: “Optimizing ovulation to first GnRH improved outcomes to each hormonal injection of Ovsynch in lactating dairy cows”. Emphasis in reproductive physiology and management of cattle Advisor: Dr. J. Richard Pursley, Associate Professor Veterinary Medicine Doctor 2003 Catholic University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Argentina Junior Computer Science and Database Management Technician 1997 Cervantes Institution for Computer Sciences, Cordoba, Argentina PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT EXPERIENCE Full Professor 2020 – Present Associate Professor 2015 – 2020 Assistant Professor 2010 – 2015 Department of Statistics,
    [Show full text]
  • Description of Enterobius (Colobenterobius) Emodensis Sp. N
    Zootaxa 4514 (1): 065–076 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4514.1.5 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C9C5FC4C-4402-4FA0-BBE7-0814172BE2C0 Description of Enterobius (Colobenterobius) emodensis sp. n. (Nematoda: Oxyuridae) collected from Central Himalayan langur, Semnopithecus schistaceus, in Uttarakhand, India HIDEO HASEGAWA1,4, HIMANI NAUTIYAL2, MIZUKI SASAKI3 & MICHAEL A. HUFFMAN2 1Department of Biomedicine / Department of Infectious Disease Control, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Hasama, Yufu, Oita 879–5593, Japan. E-mail: [email protected] 2Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Aichi 484-8506, Japan. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 3Department of Parasitology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido 078-8510, Japan. E-mail: [email protected] 4Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A new pinworm species, Enterobius (Colobenterobius) emodensis sp. n. (Nematoda: Oxyuridae) is described from the Central Himalayan langur, Semnopithecus schistaceus, in Mandal Valley, Chamoli District, Uttarakhand, India, based on mature and immature adults and fourth-stage larvae. This species closely resembles Enterobius (Colobenterobius) zakiri parasitic in Tarai langur, Semnopithecus hector, recorded from Uttarakhand and Uttar Pradesh, India, but is readily distin- guished by having a shorter esophagus and a shorter spicule. It is surmised that this pinworm has co-speciated with the host langur. The new species is also characterized in that the posterior 1/3 of the esophageal corpus is much darker. Phy- logenetic analysis based on the sequences of partial Cox1 gene of mtDNA suggested a basal position of diversification of Colobenterobius from the Enterobius lineage.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Greenhouse Insects and Mites Identification and Management the List of Common Greenhouse Insects and Mites in Colorado Is a Fairly Short One
    Common Greenhouse Insects and Mites Identification and Management The list of common greenhouse insects and mites in Colorado is a fairly short one: • Aphids (several species) • Whiteflies (one species) • Thrips (two common species) • Twpspotted spider mite • Fungus gnats • Tomato/potato psyllid Aphids Hemiptera: Aphididae Primary aphid species found in greenhouses Green peach aphid Cotton-melon aphid Potato aphid Body plan of a typical, wingless aphid All aphids go through three feeding stages, each punctuated with a molting event “Cast skins”, the discarded remnants of the exoskeleton after molting Diagnostic: “Cast Skins” remain after aphids molt Live birth and asexual reproduction are the norm with aphids Aphid populations can increase rapidly Adults may be winged or wingless Wing pads of late stage aphid nymph Adults may be winged or wingless Piercing-sucking mouthparts of Hemiptera (aphids, whiteflies, mealybugs, leafhoppers, etc.) Probocis (primarily the labium) of an aphid Stylet bundle (mandibles and maxillae) meandering through plant en route to phloem Aphids use their mouthparts to access the fluids of the phloem Little, if any, cell injury is produced by most aphids Important Note: Presence of aphids does not always equate to occurrence of plant injury! Honeydew production Uptake of phloem fluids here Emergence of “honeydew” here Leaf with sparkles of honeydew – and cast skins The leaf above the honeydew – an aphid colony Leaf with sparkles of honeydew – and cast skins Some non-aphid honeydew producing insects Whiteflies Mealybugs
    [Show full text]
  • Further Screening of Entomopathogenic Fungi and Nematodes As Control Agents for Drosophila Suzukii
    insects Article Further Screening of Entomopathogenic Fungi and Nematodes as Control Agents for Drosophila suzukii Andrew G. S. Cuthbertson * and Neil Audsley Fera, Sand Hutton, York YO41 1LZ, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-1904-462-201 Academic Editor: Brian T. Forschler Received: 15 March 2016; Accepted: 6 June 2016; Published: 9 June 2016 Abstract: Drosophila suzukii populations remain low in the UK. To date, there have been no reports of widespread damage. Previous research demonstrated that various species of entomopathogenic fungi and nematodes could potentially suppress D. suzukii population development under laboratory trials. However, none of the given species was concluded to be specifically efficient in suppressing D. suzukii. Therefore, there is a need to screen further species to determine their efficacy. The following entomopathogenic agents were evaluated for their potential to act as control agents for D. suzukii: Metarhizium anisopliae; Isaria fumosorosea; a non-commercial coded fungal product (Coded B); Steinernema feltiae, S. carpocapsae, S. kraussei and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora. The fungi were screened for efficacy against the fly on fruit while the nematodes were evaluated for the potential to be applied as soil drenches targeting larvae and pupal life-stages. All three fungi species screened reduced D. suzukii populations developing from infested berries. Isaria fumosorosea significantly (p < 0.001) reduced population development of D. suzukii from infested berries. All nematodes significantly reduced adult emergence from pupal cases compared to the water control. Larvae proved more susceptible to nematode infection. Heterorhabditis bacteriophora proved the best from the four nematodes investigated; readily emerging from punctured larvae and causing 95% mortality.
    [Show full text]
  • VINEYARD BIODIVERSITY and INSECT INTERACTIONS! ! - Establishing and Monitoring Insectariums! !
    ! VINEYARD BIODIVERSITY AND INSECT INTERACTIONS! ! - Establishing and monitoring insectariums! ! Prepared for : GWRDC Regional - SA Central (Adelaide Hills, Currency Creek, Kangaroo Island, Langhorne Creek, McLaren Vale and Southern Fleurieu Wine Regions) By : Mary Retallack Date : August 2011 ! ! ! !"#$%&'(&)'*!%*!+& ,- .*!/'01)!.'*&----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&2 3-! "&(')1+&'*&4.*%5"/0&#.'0.4%/+.!5&-----------------------------------------------------------------------------&6! ! &ABA <%5%+3!C0-72D0E2!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!F! &A&A! ;D,!*2!G*0.*1%-2*3,!*HE0-3#+3I!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!J! &AKA! ;#,2!0L!%+D#+5*+$!G*0.*1%-2*3,!*+!3D%!1*+%,#-.!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!B&! 7- .*+%)!"/.18+&--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&,2! ! ! KABA ;D#3!#-%!*+2%53#-*MH2I!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!BN! KA&A! O3D%-!C#,2!0L!L0-H*+$!#!2M*3#G8%!D#G*3#3!L0-!G%+%L*5*#82!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!&P! KAKA! ?%8%53*+$!3D%!-*$D3!2E%5*%2!30!E8#+3!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!&B! 9- :$"*!.*;&5'1/&.*+%)!"/.18&-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&3<!
    [Show full text]
  • Population Genetics, Community of Parasites, and Resistance to Rodenticides in an Urban Brown Rat (Rattus Norvegicus) Population
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Population genetics, community of parasites, and resistance to rodenticides in an urban brown rat (Rattus norvegicus) population AmeÂlie Desvars-Larrive1, Michel Pascal2², Patrick Gasqui3, Jean-FrancËois Cosson4,5, Etienne BenoõÃt6, Virginie Lattard6, Laurent Crespin3, Olivier Lorvelec2, BenoõÃt Pisanu7, Alexandre TeynieÂ3, Muriel Vayssier-Taussat4, Sarah Bonnet4, Philippe Marianneau8, Sandra Lacoà te8, Pascale Bourhy9, Philippe Berny6, Nicole Pavio10, Sophie Le Poder10, Emmanuelle Gilot-Fromont11, Elsa Jourdain3, Abdessalem Hammed6, Isabelle Fourel6, Farid Chikh12, GwenaeÈl Vourc'h3* a1111111111 a1111111111 1 Conservation Medicine, Research Institute of Wildlife Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria, 2 Joint Research Unit (JRU) E cologie et Sante des E cosystèmes (ESE), Institut National de la a1111111111 Recherche Agronomique, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, Rennes, France, 3 Joint Research Unit (JRU) a1111111111 EpideÂmiologie des Maladies Animales et Zoonotiques (EPIA), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, a1111111111 INRA, VetAgro Sup, Saint-Genès Champanelle, France, 4 Joint Research Unit (JRU) Biologie MoleÂculaire et Immunologie Parasitaire (BIPAR), Agence Nationale de SeÂcurite Sanitaire de l'Alimentation, de l'Environnement et du Travail (ANSES), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, INRA, Ecole Nationale VeÂteÂrinaire d'Alfort (ENVA), Maisons-Alfort, France, 5 Joint Research Unit (JRU) Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Populations (CBGP), Centre de CoopeÂration Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le DeÂveloppement (CIRAD), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, INRA, Institut OPEN ACCESS de Recherche pour le DeÂveloppement (IRD), SupAgro Montpellier, France, 6 Contract-based Research Unit (CBRU) Rongeurs Sauvages±Risques Sanitaires et Gestion des Populations (RS2GP), VetAgro Sup, Citation: Desvars-Larrive A, Pascal M, Gasqui P, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, INRA, Lyon University, Marcy-L'Etoile, France, 7 Unite Cosson J-F, BenoõÃt E, Lattard V, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Role of the Rove Beetle, Dalotia Coriaria, and Insidious Flower Bug, Orius Insidiosus, in Greenhouse Biological Control Programs
    Advances in Entomology, 2017, 5, 115-126 http://www.scirp.org/journal/ae ISSN Online: 2331-2017 ISSN Print: 2331-1991 Ecology and Role of the Rove Beetle, Dalotia coriaria, and Insidious Flower Bug, Orius insidiosus, in Greenhouse Biological Control Programs Raymond A. Cloyd*, Nathan J. Herrick Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA How to cite this paper: Cloyd, R.A. and Abstract Herrick, N.J. (2017) Ecology and Role of the Rove Beetle, Dalotia coriaria, and Insidious Greenhouse production systems typically involve growing multiple crop types Flower Bug, Orius insidiosus, in Greenhouse simultaneously, including ornamentals and vegetables. Therefore, greenhouse Biological Control Programs. Advances in producers commonly deal with multiple pest complexes. Two important insect Entomology, 5, 115-126. https://doi.org/10.4236/ae.2017.54012 pests of greenhouse-grown horticultural crops are fungus gnats (Bradysia spp.) and western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis). A plant protection Received: July 6, 2017 strategy that can be used to manage both pests is biological control. The rove Accepted: August 7, 2017 Published: August 10, 2017 beetle (Dalotia coriaria) and insidious flower bug (Orius insidiosus) are generalist predators commercially available for use in greenhouse production Copyright © 2017 by authors and systems targeting fungus gnats and the western flower thrips. This article Scientific Research Publishing Inc. describes the biology, behavior, ecology, and role of both natural enemies in This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International greenhouse production systems, and discusses the direct and indirect effects License (CC BY 4.0). of pesticides (insecticides, miticides, and fungicides) on D.
    [Show full text]
  • Carpophilus Mutilatus) (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) in Relation to Different Concentrations of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) - 6443
    Nor-Atikah et al.: Evaluation on colour changes, survival rate and life span of the confused sap beetle (Carpophilus mutilatus) (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) in relation to different concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) - 6443 - EVALUATION OF COLOUR CHANGES, SURVIVAL RATE AND LIFE SPAN OF THE CONFUSED SAP BEETLE (Carpophilus mutilatus) (COLEOPTERA: NITIDULIDAE) IN DIFFERENT CONCENTRATIONS OF CARBON DIOXIDE (CO2) NOR-ATIKAH, A. R. – HALIM, M. – NUR-HASYIMAH, H. – YAAKOP, S.* Centre for Insect Systematics, Department of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected]; phone: +60-389-215-698 (Received 8th Apr 2020; accepted 13th Aug 2020) Abstract. This study conducted in a rearing room (RR) (300-410 ppm) and in an open roof ventilation greenhouse system (ORVS) (800-950 ppm). No changes observed on Carpophilus mutilatus colouration after treatment in the ORVS. The survival rate increased from 61.59% in the F1 to 73.05% in the F2 generation reared in the RR. However, a sharp decline was observed from 27.05% in F1 to 1.5% in F2 in the ORVS. There was significant difference in number of individuals between RR and ORVS in F1 and F2 (F 12.76 p= 0.001< 0.05). The life span of F1 and F2 in the RR took about 46 days to complete; 7-21 days from adult to larvae stage, 5-15 days from the larval to pupal stage and 3-10 days from adult to pupal stage. Whereas in ORVS, F1 and F2 took about 30 and 22 days, respectively to complete their life cycles; that is 7-14, 7-14 days (adult to larval stage), 5-10, 0-5 days (larval to pupal stage) and 3-6, 0-3 days (pupal to adult stage), respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • SR-112 Science of Hemp: Production and Pest Management
    University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Food and Environment Agricultural Experiment Station SR-112 Science of Hemp: Production and Pest Management Science of Hemp: Production and Pest Management October 10 –11, 2019 Agricultural Kentucky Tobacco Research and Development Center | Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory | Division of Regulatory Services | Research and Education Center Experiment Station Robinson Forest | Robinson Center for Appalachian Resource Sustainability | University of Kentucky Superfund Research Center | Equine Programs emp (Cannabis sativa with <0.3% THC content) is grown for fiber, grain, and cannabinoid extraction in Asia, Europe, and the Americas. Until recently, HCannabis sativa has been classified as a Schedule 1 controlled substance in the US. The Agricultural Act of 2014 (Farm Bill) allowed for reintroduction of industrial hemp under a pilot research program. Acreage increases and addition of state legislation resulted in over 78,000 acres of hemp grown in 23 states by the end of 2018. Hemp became a legal commodity under the 2018 Farm Bill, and by the end of 2019, over 500,000 licensed acres were documented across 45 states. Canada re-introduced the crop in 1998, and in 2018, almost 78,000 acres of hemp were licensed and planted. With this increase in acreage and the lack of modern scientific data, university and government agricultural specialists began to work on various components of production and a range of realized challenges. This new information, however, had either not been shared or was not readily accessible to the scientific community, especially early results and nonpublished data. The first annual meeting of the Science of Hemp: Production and Pest Management was held on October 10-11, 2019 at the University of Kentucky in Lexington, KY.
    [Show full text]
  • AGILE GRACILE OPOSSUM Gracilinanus Agilis (Burmeister, 1854 )
    Smith P - Gracilinanus agilis - FAUNA Paraguay Handbook of the Mammals of Paraguay Number 35 2009 AGILE GRACILE OPOSSUM Gracilinanus agilis (Burmeister, 1854 ) FIGURE 1 - Adult, Brazil (Nilton Caceres undated). TAXONOMY: Class Mammalia; Subclass Theria; Infraclass Metatheria; Magnorder Ameridelphia; Order Didelphimorphia; Family Didelphidae; Subfamily Thylamyinae; Tribe Marmosopsini (Myers et al 2006, Gardner 2007). The genus Gracilinanus was defined by Gardner & Creighton 1989. There are six known species according to the latest revision (Gardner 2007) one of which is present in Paraguay. The generic name Gracilinanus is taken from Latin (gracilis) and Greek (nanos) meaning "slender dwarf", in reference to the slight build of this species. The species name agilis is Latin meaning "agile" referring to the nimble climbing technique of this species. (Braun & Mares 1995). The species is monotypic, but Gardner (2007) considers it to be composite and in need of revision. Furthermore its relationship to the cerrado species Gracilinanus agilis needs to be examined, with some authorities suggesting that the two may be at least in part conspecific - there appear to be no consistent cranial differences (Gardner 2007). Costa et al (2003) found the two species to be morphologically and genetically distinct and the two species have been found in sympatry in at least one locality in Minas Gerais, Brazil (Geise & Astúa 2009) where the authors found that they could be distinguished on external characters alone. Smith P 2009 - AGILE GRACILE OPOSSUM Gracilinanus agilis - Mammals of Paraguay Nº 35 Page 1 Smith P - Gracilinanus agilis - FAUNA Paraguay Handbook of the Mammals of Paraguay Number 35 2009 Patton & Costa (2003) commented that the presence of the similar Gracilinanus microtarsus at Lagoa Santa, Minas Gerais, the type locality for G.agilis , raises the possibility that the type specimen may in fact prove to be what is currently known as G.microtarsus .
    [Show full text]
  • List of Biological Control Agents Widely Used in the Eppo Region
    EPPO Standards SAFE USE OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL LIST OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS WIDELY USED IN THE EPPO REGION PM 6/3 English 2021 VERSION oepp eppo European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization 21 Boulevard Richard Lenoir, 75011 Paris, France APPROVAL EPPO Standards are approved by EPPO Council. The date of approval appears in each individual standard. In the terms of Article II of the IPPC, EPPO Standards are Regional Standards for the members of EPPO. REVIEW EPPO Standards are subject to periodic review and amendment. The next review date for this set of EPPO Standards is decided by the EPPO Working Party on Phytosanitary Regulations. AMENDMENT RECORD Amendments will be issued as necessary, numbered and dated. The dates of amendment appear in each individual standard (as appropriate). DISTRIBUTION EPPO Standards are distributed by the EPPO Secretariat to all EPPO member governments. Copies are available to any interested person under particular conditions upon request to the EPPO Secretariat. SCOPE The EPPO Standards on the safe use of biological control are intended to be used by NPPOs or equivalent authorities, in their capacity as bodies responsible for overseeing and, if appropriate, regulating the introduction and use of biological control agents. OUTLINE OF REQUIREMENTS NPPOs of the EPPO region generally promote the use of biological control in plant protection because, like other aspects of integrated pest management, it reduces risks to human health and the environment. Use of biological control agents may, nevertheless, present some risks, in particular for the environment if exotic agents are introduced from other continents, and for the user if agents are formulated as plant protection products.
    [Show full text]
  • Hox-Logic of Body Plan Innovations for Social Symbiosis in Rove Beetles
    bioRxiv preprint first posted online Oct. 5, 2017; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/198945. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Hox-logic of body plan innovations for social symbiosis in rove beetles 2 3 Joseph Parker1*, K. Taro Eldredge2, Isaiah M. Thomas3, Rory Coleman4 and Steven R. Davis5 4 5 1Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 6 CA 91125, USA 7 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and Division of Entomology, Biodiversity 8 Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA 9 3Department of Genetics and Development, Columbia University, 701 West 168th Street, New 10 York, NY 10032, USA 11 4Laboratory of Neurophysiology and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, 12 USA 13 5Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, 14 USA 15 *correspondence: [email protected] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 bioRxiv preprint first posted online Oct. 5, 2017; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/198945. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 How symbiotic lifestyles evolve from free-living ecologies is poorly understood. In 2 Metazoa’s largest family, Staphylinidae (rove beetles), numerous lineages have evolved 3 obligate behavioral symbioses with ants or termites.
    [Show full text]