DOCSLIB.ORG

With Funding Status Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
With Funding Status Of Humanitarian Response Plan(s): Republic of South Sudan 2016 List of appeal projects (grouped by Cluster), with funding status of each Report as of 29-Sep-2021 http://fts.unocha.org (Table ref: R3) Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and recipient organizations. Project Code Title Organization Original Revised Funding % Unmet Outstanding requirements requirements USD Covered requirements pledges USD USD USD USD Agriculture SSD-16/A/88653/7790 Increasing food and nutritional security GOAL 2,333,568 2,333,568 545,746 23% 1,787,822 0 and encouraging market recovery in the Abyei Administrative Area as well as Warrap, Upper Nile and Central Equatoria States SSD-16/A/88670/8452 Responding to Food Security and Nile Hope 570,000 570,000 180,000 32% 390,000 0 Livelihood Emergencies for Vulnerable IDPS and Host Communities in Akobo , Uror, Nassir and Ulang Counties of Jonglei and Upper Nile States Enhancing Food Security and VSF (Switzerland) 1,000,000 1,200,000 2,206,074 184% -1,006,074 0 SSD-16/A/88817/R/5110 Livelihoods of Vulnerable Agro- pastoralists Communities in Unity and Northern Bahr el Ghazal States ’’’’ SSD-16/A/88821/5146 Improving Food Security and Livelihoods CRS 4,864,558 4,864,558 4,864,558 100% 0 0 for IDPs, returnees and host communities in Jonglei and Lakes states SSD-16/A/88889/123 Emergency Livelihood Support to disaster FAO 43,190,000 43,190,000 39,855,968 92% 3,334,032 0 affected population in South Sudan SSD-16/A/89000/16791 Emergency Food Security & Livelihoods FCDI 179,000 179,000 0 0% 179,000 0 response to the most vulnerable communities through crop and vegetable seeds, fishing gears distribution and Provision of animal health services in Fangak and Canal Pigi Counties, Jonglei State SSD-16/A/89019/5179 Support vulnerable IDPs, and host IRC 1,270,120 1,270,120 1,221,412 96% 48,708 0 communities to continue to have regular access to food, protect and rehabilitate livelihoods in Koch, Panyijiar (Unity),and South Counties through provision of production inputs. SSD-16/A/89097/16254 ADDRESSING HIGH FOOD JAM International 800,000 800,000 390,164 49% 409,836 0 INSECURITY SITUATION AMONGST 100000 VULNERABLE PEOPLE IN SOUTH AND CENTRAL COUNTIES AND RUBKONA PAYAMS IN UNITY STATE SOUTH SUDAN SSD-16/A/89186/5587 Emergency Livestock Protection VSF (Germany) 900,000 900,000 1,500,000 167% -600,000 0 Response for the Vulnerable Population at Risk of Hunger and Malnutrition in Upper Nile and Jonglei States of South Sudan SSD-16/A/89659/R/ PROMOTING EMERGENCY FOOD CISDA 460,000 447,000 230,620 52% 216,380 0 SECURITY AND LIVELIHOOD 17482 RESPONSE PROGRAM TO 378,000 VULNERABLE PEOPLE IN NORTHERN MAYENDIT AND NYIROL COUNTIES IN UNITY AND JONGLEI STATE. SSD-16/A/95555/R/ Post-Conflicts Emergency Food Security SPEDP 0 360,000 0 0% 360,000 0 and Livelihood Recovery Project for Aweil 14922 North County of Northern Bahr el Ghazal State SSD-16/A/95556/R/ Protection and Provision of livelihood RuCAPD 0 508,000 200,005 39% 307,995 0 asset through livestock health services 16790 and vegetable/ fishing kits to the most vulnerable agro-pastoralist communities in Central Equitoria-Juba Peri Urban and Urban , Upper Nile State-Malakal, Baliet and Panyikang Counties. SSD-16/A/95567/R/ Provision of emergency-transitional food AFOD 0 450,000 0 0% 450,000 0 security interventions to vulnerable 16251 households in counties of Raga, Jur River in Western Bahr El Ghazel and Budi, Magwi in Eastern Equatoria with focus on GFD, agricultural production and local capacity strengthening for animal health. Sub total for Agriculture 55,567,246 57,072,246 51,194,547 90% 5,877,699 0 Coordination and support services SSD-16/CSS/86459/5181 IDP Site Management Services for DRC 2,651,000 2,651,000 995,047 38% 1,655,953 0 displacement sites in Upper Nile State SSD-16/CSS/88779/298 Provision of Camp Coordination and IOM 17,500,000 17,500,000 16,175,715 92% 1,324,285 0 Camp Management services to displaced populations in South Sudan SSD-16/CSS/88788/298 Provision of Cluster Coordination for the IOM 4,600,000 4,600,000 50,150 1% 4,549,850 0 Camp Coordination and Camp Management Sector SSD-16/CSS/88865/298 Provision of Common Logistics Services IOM 4,550,000 4,550,000 2,949,994 65% 1,600,006 0 for Humanitarians in the Republic of South Sudan SSD-16/CSS/88958/561 Logistics Cluster Activities in Support of WFP 36,181,121 36,181,121 24,036,946 66% 12,144,175 0 the Humanitarian Community in South Sudan SSD-16/CSS/88976/5767 Enabling Emergency Humanitarian UNOPS 4,000,000 4,000,000 0 0% 4,000,000 0 Access and Response SSD-16/CSS/89242/561 PROVISION OF HUMANITARIAN AIR WFP 50,000,000 50,000,000 39,995,018 80% 10,004,982 0 SERVICES IN THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN (2016) SSD-16/CSS/89245/6458 Strengthened Camp Coordination and ACTED 4,500,000 4,500,000 3,673,205 82% 826,795 0 Camp Management and Information Management Services for improved living conditions and transitional/durable solutions for Internally Displaced Persons in South Sudan SSD-16/CSS/89391/561 Emergency Telecommunications Cluster WFP 663,061 663,061 663,374 100% -313 0 Activities and Services in Support of the Humanitarian Community in South Sudan SSD-16/CSS/89475/ Improving delivery of humanitarian AFOD 140,000 140,000 0 0% 140,000 0 services and protection of IDPs through 16251 efficient and effective multi-sectoral response at the county-level to assist and protect populations residing in displacement sites and to advocate for durable solutions with full participation of women, girls, boys and men from IDPs in Terekeka County and Northern Bari Payam of Juba County. SSD-16/CSS/89783/119 Strengthening Humanitarian Coordination OCHA 9,202,299 9,202,299 8,485,587 92% 716,712 0 and Common Services in South Sudan SSD-16/CSS/89845/5157 Strengthening Independent NGO TEARFUND 1,050,000 1,050,000 0 0% 1,050,000 0 Coordination in South Sudan SSD-16/CSS/89930/298 Support to humanitarians with Lightweight IOM 5,000,000 5,000,000 0 0% 5,000,000 0 Base Camps (LBCs), National NGO support centers and fuel storage within Juba for NGOs. SSD-16/CSS/90760/ Capacity Building in security, humanitarian RedR UK 753,372 753,372 0 0% 753,372 0 standards and technologies for 13139 Humanitarian Personnel working in South Sudan SSD-16/CSS/90885/5139 Security Support to UN Agencies and UNDSS 1,300,000 1,300,000 0 0% 1,300,000 0 Implementing Partners Operating in South Sudan PROVISION OF HUMANITARIAN AIR WFP 4,800,000 4,800,000 5,185,855 108% -385,855 0 SSD-16/CSS/90930/561 SERVICES IN THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN FOR MEDICAL EVACUATION AND SECURITY RELOCATIONS(2016)’’’’ Sub total for Coordination and support services 146,890,853 146,890,853 102,210,891 70% 44,679,962 0 Economic recovery and infrastructure Enhance crop production as an CHADO 373,000 373,000 0 0% 373,000 0 SSD-16/ER/88724/17209 alternative livelihood among women and youth for peace building in Warrap Tonj South County and Jongolei State in Uror and Akobo Counties ’’’’ SSD-16/ER/88748/R/ Increase Food access and utilization IIRR 310,000 310,000 0 0% 310,000 0 among Pastoral/Agro Pastoral Host 8381 communities and otherwise affected populations in 3 counties of Lake State (Rumbek East, Rumbek North and Cueibet Counties) SSD-16/ER/88765/6458 Increased self-reliance and rehabilitated ACTED 5,050,400 5,050,400 0 0% 5,050,400 0 livelihoods for vulnerable and at risk populations in South Sudan SSD-16/ER/88767/8498 Improving Food and Income Security CW 1,725,905 1,725,905 0 0% 1,725,905 0 among returnees, IDPs and vulnerable populations in Northern Bahr el Ghazal Food security and livelihood ZOA 900,000 900,000 471,061 52% 428,939 0 SSD-16/ER/88773/5150 emergency support for vulnerable returnee and IDP families with their hosts in near-crises areas of Bor South County and GPAA’’’’ SSD-16/ER/88776/R/ Food Security and Livelihoods Provision DRC 525,000 525,000 2,319,359 442% -1,794,359 0 and Protection for conflict affected IDPs 5181 and host communities in Upper Nile and Unity States Food security and livelihoods CMD 450,000 450,000 99,669 22% 350,331 0 SSD-16/ER/88781/R/ support to IDPs, returnees and 14945 vulnerable host communities in Jonglei and Upper Nile States’’’’ SSD-16/ER/88791/8497 Enhancing Livelihoods assets protection FH 500,000 500,000 500,000 100% 0 0 and rehabilitation for community resilience among conflict-affected communities in Jonglei State, South Sudan. SSD-16/ER/88806/5125 Restoring food security and livelihoods of NPA 1,570,426 1,570,426 1,770,120 113% -199,694 0 IDPs, returnees and vulnerable crisis affected communities in South Sudan SSD-16/ER/88832/5834 Support to vulnerable IDP and host NRC 2,845,000 2,845,000 2,369,046 83% 475,954 0 community households in Jonglei, Unity, NBeG, WBeG and Warrap to be food secure and better prepared for shocks SSD-16/ER/88846/5390 Support to enhance the food security and ACT/FCA 440,000 440,000 0 0% 440,000 0 community coping capacity, Jonglei, South Sudan SSD-16/ER/88925/5059 Addressing acute food and livelihood ACT/CA 1,296,240 1,296,240 766,681 59% 529,559 0 insecurity among vulnerable conflict affected households in central and southern Unity State SSD-16/ER/88943/5162 Integrated FSL response to vulnerable Mercy Corps 2,943,750 2,943,750 299,278 10% 2,644,472 0 populations in southern Unity State (emergency cash transfer, cash for work and agricultural extension) SSD-16/ER/88994/6116 Food Security and Livelihoods support to Samaritan's Purse 3,478,664 3,478,664 6,158,649 177% -2,679,985 0 conflict-affected and vulnerable communities in Northern Bahr El Ghazal and Unity states Emergency
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Sudan Village Assessment Survey
    IOM DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX VILLAGE ASSESSMENT SURVEY SOUTH SUD AN IOM DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX SOUTH SUDAN SOUTH SUDAN VILLAGE ASSESSMENT SURVEY DATA COLLECTION: August-November 2019 COUNTIES: Bor South, Rubkona, Wau THEMATIC AREAS: Shelter and Land Ownership, Access and Communications, Livelihoods, Markets, Food Security and Coping Strategies, Health, WASH, Education, Protection 1 IOM DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX VILLAGE ASSESSMENT SURVEY SOUTH SUD AN CONTENTS RUBKONA COUNTY OVERVIEW 15 DISPLACEMENT DYNAMICS 15 RETURN PATTERNS 15 PAYAM CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION 16 KEY FINDINGS 17 Shelter and Land Ownership 17 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Access and Communications 17 LIST OF ACRONYMS 3 Markets, Food Security and Coping Strategies 17 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Livelihoods 18 BACKROUND 6 Health 19 WASH 19 METHODOLOGY 6 Education 20 LIMITATIONS 7 Protection 20 WAU COUNTY OVERVIEW 8 BOR SOUTH COUNTY OVERVIEW 21 DISPLACEMENT DYNAMICS 8 RETURN PATTERNS 8 DISPLACEMENT DYNAMICS 21 PAYAM CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION 9 RETURN PATTERNS 21 KEY FINDINGS 10 PAYAM CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION 22 KEY FINDINGS 23 Shelter and Land Ownership 10 Access and Communications 10 Shelter and Land Ownership 23 Markets, Food Security and Coping Strategies 10 Access and Communications 23 Livelihoods 11 Markets, Food Security and Coping Strategies 23 Health 12 Livelihoods 24 WASH 13 Health 25 Protection 13 Education 26 Education 14 WASH 27 Protection 27 2 3 IOM DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX VILLAGE ASSESSMENT SURVEY SOUTH SUD AN LIST OF ACRONYMS AIDS: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
    [Show full text]
  • Tables from the 5Th Sudan Population and Housing Census, 2008
    Southern Sudan Counts: Tables from the 5th Sudan Population and Housing Census, 2008 November 19, 2010 CENSU OR S,S F TA RE T T IS N T E IC C S N A N A 123 D D β U E S V A N L R ∑σ µ U E A H T T I O U N O S S S C C S E Southern Sudan Counts: Tables from the 5th Sudan Population and Housing Census, 2008 November 19, 2010 ii Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................. iv Acronyms ...................................................................................................................... x Foreword ....................................................................................................................... xiv Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ xv Background and Mandate of the Southern Sudan Centre for Census, Statistics and Evaluation (SSCCSE) ...................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 History of Census-taking in Southern Sudan....................................................................... 2 Questionnaire Content, Sampling and Methodology ............................................................ 2 Implementation .............................................................................................................. 2
    [Show full text]
  • Security Responses in Jonglei State in the Aftermath of Inter-Ethnic Violence
    Security responses in Jonglei State in the aftermath of inter-ethnic violence By Richard B. Rands and Dr. Matthew LeRiche Saferworld February 2012 1 Contents List of acronyms 1. Introduction and key findings 2. The current situation: inter-ethnic conflict in Jonglei 3. Security responses 4. Providing an effective response: the challenges facing the security forces in South Sudan 5. Support from UNMISS and other significant international actors 6. Conclusion List of Acronyms CID Criminal Intelligence Division CPA Comprehensive Peace Agreement CRPB Conflict Reduction and Peace Building GHQ General Headquarters GoRSS Government of the Republic of South Sudan ICG International Crisis Group MSF Medecins Sans Frontières MI Military Intelligence NISS National Intelligence and Security Service NSS National Security Service SPLA Sudan People’s Liberation Army SPLM Sudan People’s Liberation Movement SRSG Special Representative of the Secretary General SSP South Sudanese Pounds SSPS South Sudan Police Service SSR Security Sector Reform UNMISS United Nations Mission in South Sudan UYMPDA Upper Nile Youth Mobilization for Peace and Development Agency Acknowledgements This paper was written by Richard B. Rands and Dr Matthew LeRiche. The authors would like to thank Jessica Hayes for her invaluable contribution as research assistant to this paper. The paper was reviewed and edited by Sara Skinner and Hesta Groenewald (Saferworld). Opinions expressed in the paper are those of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of Saferworld. Saferworld is grateful for the funding provided to its South Sudan programme by the UK Department for International Development (DfID) through its South Sudan Peace Fund and the Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) through its Global Peace and Security Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Jonglei State, South Sudan Introduction Key Findings
    Situation Overview: Jonglei State, South Sudan January to March 2019 Introduction Map 1: REACH assessment coverage METHODOLOGY of Jonglei State, January 2019 To provide an overview of the situation in hard-to- Insecurity related to cattle raiding and inter- Map 3: REACH assessment coverage of Jonglei State, March 2019 reach areas of Jonglei State, REACH uses primary communal violence reported across various data from key informants who have recently arrived parts of Jonglei continued to impact the from, recently visited, or receive regular information ability to cultivate food and access basic Fangak Canal/Pigi from a settlement or “Area of Knowledge” (AoK). services, sustaining large-scale humanitarian Nyirol Information for this report was collected from key needs in Jonglei State, South Sudan. Ayod informants in Bor Protection of Civilians site, Bor By March 2019, approximately 5 months Town and Akobo Town in Jonglei State in January, since the harvest season, settlements February and March 2019. Akobo Duk Uror struggled to extend food rations to the In-depth interviews on humanitarian needs were Twic Pochalla same extent as reported in previous years. Map 2: REACH assessment coverage East conducted throughout the month using a structured of Jonglei State, February 2019 survey tool. After data collection was completed, To inform humanitarian actors working Bor South all data was aggregated at settlement level, and outside formal settlement sites, REACH has Pibor settlements were assigned the modal or most conducted assessments of hard-to-reach credible response. When no consensus could be areas in South Sudan since December found for a settlement, that settlement was not Assessed settlements 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected], Area Mapped Logcluster Office, UNOCHA Compound and Jebel Kajur, Juba South Sudan
    Sani Mingyeir Sullu Oubbe Wada`ah Djiri Bajouggi Karaw Balla Nyama Ludung Margibba Arga Gertobak Dalia Zulumingtong Gostoweir El Rahad Gyaga Manawashi En Nahud Duraysah Kurbi Karbab Godoba Silo Arid Limo Menawashei Tebeldina Kurto Kulme Gabir Futajiggi Shurab Zulata Tanako Burbur Seingo Kalamboa Uraydimah Kass Attib Deleig Kalu Dilu Shearia Shaqq Bunzuga al Gawa Galgani Duma Garoula Tangya Korgusa Garsila Kagko Khamis Abu zor Amar Seilo Ballah Umm Marabba Gedid Mogara Dauro Shalkha Harun Tumbo Qawz Beringil Lerwa Baya Saq an Na`am Buhera Sineit Goldober Singeiwa Agra Nyala Labado Sereiwa Baddal Sigeir Dilling Kirarow Tumko Umm Sa Disa Um Kurdus Shaqq Girbanat Kasoleri Buronga Gerger Saheib Mabrouka al Huja El Lait Bendisi Diri Tono Abu Mukjar Ambara Deimbo Buddu El doma Gartaga Abou Sufyan Dalami Artala Shuwayy Rashad El Roseires Um Sarir @Adid Al Muturwed Dashi Wad Abu Kubum Dago Ed Damazin Tetene Keikei Hassib Gheid Renk Nurlei Um Boim Î Damba El kharaba West Lasirei Luma Solwong Murr Njumbeil Agi Abu Ghazal Qubba Girru Ajala Um La`ota Abu Marlenga Ma'aliah 1 Jawazat Karinka Hajar Wajage Markundi Al Marwahah Abu Ma'aliah 2 Banda Dimbala 25°0'0"E 26°0'0"E 27°0'0"E 28°0'0"E 29°0'0"E 30°0'0"EUmm 31°0'0"E 32°0'0"E 33°0'0"E 34°0'0"E 35°0'0"E 36°0'0"E Timassi Ajura heitan Abu Edd el Faki Jibaiha Lujugo Milmeidi Gettin Ibrahim 42Bakau Fursan Kukur Kosua Dambar p Lagawa Sali Kulaykili Abu @ Tabanu Agabullah Adilla Wisko War e ho u se Aradeiba Gereida Manasis Anja C ap a ci t i e s 20 11 Katayla Muhajiriye Abu `Ud Heiban Um- 68Akoc Dukhun Gueighrin
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan 2021 Humanitarian Response Plan
    HUMANITARIAN HUMANITARIAN PROGRAMME CYCLE 2021 RESPONSE PLAN ISSUED MARCH 2021 SOUTH SUDAN 01 About This document is consolidated by OCHA on behalf of the Humanitarian Country Team and partners. The Humanitarian Response Plan is a presentation of the coordinated, strategic response devised by humanitarian agencies in order to meet the acute needs of people affected by the crisis. It is based on, and responds to, evidence of needs described in the Humanitarian Needs Overview. Manyo Renk Renk SUDAN Kaka Melut Melut Maban Fashoda Riangnhom Bunj Oriny UPPER NILE Abyei region Pariang Panyikang Malakal Abiemnhom Tonga Malakal Baliet Aweil East Abiemnom Rubkona Aweil North Guit Baliet Dajo Gok-Machar War-Awar Twic Mayom Atar 2 Longochuk Bentiu Guit Mayom Old Fangak Aweil West Turalei Canal/Pigi Gogrial East Fangak Aweil Gogrial Luakpiny/Nasir Maiwut Aweil West UNITY Yomding Raja NORTHERN South Gogrial Koch Nyirol Nasir Maiwut Raja BAHR EL Bar Mayen Koch Ulang Kuajok WARRAP Leer Lunyaker Ayod GHAAL Tonj North Mayendit Ayod Aweil Centre Waat Mayendit Leer Uror Warrap Romic ETHIOPIA Yuai Tonj East WESTERN BAHR Nyal Duk Fadiat Akobo Wau Maper JONGLEI CENTRAL EL GHAAL Panyijiar Duk Akobo Kuajiena Rumbek North AFRICAN Wau Tonj Pochalla Jur River Cueibet REPUBLIC Tonj Rumbek Kongor Pochala South Cueibet Centre Yirol East Twic East Rumbek Adior Pibor Rumbek East Nagero Wullu Akot Yirol Bor South Tambura Yirol West Nagero LAKES Awerial Pibor Bor Boma Wulu Mvolo Awerial Mvolo Tambura Terekeka Kapoeta International boundary WESTERN Terekeka North Mundri
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Uror and Nyirol Counties, South Sudan
    Researching livelihoods and services affected by conflict Livelihoods, access to services and perceptions of governance: An analysis of Uror and Nyirol counties, South Sudan Report 3 Daniel Maxwell, Martina Santschi, Rachel Gordon, Philip Dau and Leben Moro April 2014 Written by Daniel Maxwell (Tufts University, Team Leader), Martina Santschi (swisspeace), Rachel Gordon (Tufts University), Philip Dau (National Bureau of Statistics and Leben Moro (University of Juba). SLRC reports present information, analysis and key policy recommendations on issues relating to livelihoods, basic services and social protection in conflict affected situations. This and other SLRC reports are available from www.securelivelihoods.org. Funded by DFID, Irish Aid and EC. The views presented in this paper are those of the author(s) and not necessarily the views of SLRC, DFID, Irish Aid and EC. ©SLRC 2014. Readers are encouraged to quote or reproduce material from SLRC for their own publications. As copyright holder SLRC, requests due acknowledgement and a copy of the publication. Secure Livelihoods Research Consortium Overseas Development Institute (ODI) 203 Blackfriars Road London SE1 8NJ United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 7922 8249 F +44 (0)20 7922 0399 E [email protected] www.securelivelihoods.org About us The Secure Livelihoods Research Consortium (SLRC) is a six-year project funded by DFID, Irish Aid and EC. SLRC aims to bridge the gaps in knowledge about: ■ When it is appropriate to build secure livelihoods in conflict-affected situations (CAS) in addition to meeting immediate acute needs; ■ What building blocks (e.g. humanitarian assistance, social protection, agriculture and basic services) are required in different contexts; ■ Who can best deliver building blocks to secure livelihoods in different contexts; and ■ How key investments can be better and more predictably supported by effective financing mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Nyirol Final Report
    South Sudan NUTRITIONAL ANTHROPOMETRIC SURVEY CHILDREN UNDER 5 YEARS OLD LANKIEN AND TUT PAYAMS, NYIROL COUNTY JONGLEI STATE 16TH AUGUST – 12TH SEPTEMBER 2007 Edward Kutondo- Survey Program Manager Imelda .V. Awino – Nutritionist Simon Tut Gony- Program Assisstant 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ACF-USA acknowledges the support, commitment and cooperation of the following institutions and persons, who enabled the team to successfully actualize survey objectives: ª Office of United States Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA) for funding the survey; ª The Sudan Relief and Rehabilitation Commission (SSSRRC) Nyirol County for availing relevant data and ensuring smooth flow of activities; ª The entire survey team for their hard work, team spirit, commitment and endurance despite the difficult terrain; ª South Sudan Ministry of Health in Jonglei State, MSF-OCA, Sudan Red Crescent, Cush Community Relief International for availing staff for capacity building; ª Parents, caretakers and the local authority for their cooperation. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS .I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................4 .II. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................10 .III. OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................................................11 .IV. METHODOLOGY.......................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Key Informant Interview Check List
    South Sudan Annual Needs and Livelihoods Assessment, 2009/2010 J o n g l e i S t a t e R e p o r t A collaborative assessment by the Southern Sudan Relief and Rehabilitation Commission (SSRRC), Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MOAF), South Sudan Commission for Census, Statistics and Evaluation (SSCCSE) World Food Programme (WFP), United Nationals High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), February 2010 World food Ministry of Food & Agriculture South Sudan South Sudan Ministry of Health United Nations High Programme Agriculture Organization Commission for Relief & Commission for Rehabilitation and Census, Statistics Rehabilitation Refugees Forestry and Evaluation Commission Note on Maps The boundaries and names on the maps and tables in this document were produced by are approximate and do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. The Vulnerability Analysis and Mapping (VAM) Unit of WFP South Sudan have produced the maps. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS WFP Bor is greatly indebted to all State Ministry of Agriculture, State ministry of Health, SSRRC, CRS, PHO, SC- Sweden, UNHCR , FAO, local authorities and individuals who participated in planning and conducting this assessment, and provided information that formed the basis of this report. The team also thanks and appreciates the support provided by SSRRC to the teams in the field. Above all we thank Save the Children, PHO, SMOH, SMOA, CRS, UNHCR, for sending staff to participate in the assessment. WFP also appreciates the donation
    [Show full text]
  • Requesting Organization : Christian Mission for Development Allocation Type
    Requesting Organization : Christian Mission for Development Allocation Type : 2nd Round Standard Allocation Primary Cluster Sub Cluster Percentage FOOD SECURITY AND 100.00 LIVELIHOODS 100 Project Title : Food Security and Livelihood Support to Vulnerable and Multiple Crises Affected Households in Ayod and Nyirol Counties - Jonglei State. Allocation Type Category : Frontline services OPS Details Project Code : SSD-17/F/102949 Fund Project Code : SSD-17/HSS10/SA2/FSL/NGO/6441 Cluster : Food Security and Livelihoods Project Budget in US$ : 345,000.10 (FSL) Planned project duration : 6 months Priority: Planned Start Date : 01/08/2017 Planned End Date : 31/01/2018 Actual Start Date: 01/08/2017 Actual End Date: 31/01/2018 Project Summary : Food security and Livelihood response is proposed for Jonglei state, Ayod and Nyirol counties for a period of 6 months targeting the host vulnerable households, IDPs and returnee’s communities with severe food and nutrition needs in the payams of Wau, Mogok, Pajiek and Pagil in Ayod and Nyambor, Thor, Pultruk and Pading in Nyirol county. These locations lie within the IPC phase 4 due to displacement and hunger rate that occurred from the fighting, inaccessibility, poor harvests in the last season and the recent outbreak of cholera hence we will be supporting the HRP plan through supporting livelihoods in these complex emergencies. The widespread loss of livelihood since the onset of violence in these counties warrants a response to mitigate the loss of livelihoods and life due to hunger, malnutrition, fighting and displacements. Activities in response to the ongoing emergency will aim to improve general availability of food and strengthen vulnerable communities’ ability to withstand future threats associated with massive displacements.
    [Show full text]
  • Incidents of Inter-Communal Violence in Jonglei State
    INCIDENTS OF INTER-COMMUNAL VIOLENCE IN JONGLEI STATE June 2012 United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) CONTENTS Executive Summary………………….…..…………………………………………………….i List of Acronyms……………………………………………………………………..………vii Map showing the ten States of South Sudan with Jonglei State highlighted .............................viii Map of Jonglei Counties ............................................................................................................ ix I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 II. MANDATE AND METHODOLOGY OF THE INVESTIGATIONS .................................... 2 III. HUMAN RIGHTS FRAMEWORK ...................................................................................... 5 IV. BACKGROUND/CONTEXT ................................................................................................ 5 V. FINDINGS OF HUMAN RIGHTS INVESTIGATIONS INTO INTER-COMMUNAL VIOLENCE IN JONGLEI.......................................................................................................... 9 Attacks between Lou Nuer and Murle: January-August 2011 ........................................................... 9 The Lou Nuer attacks on the Murle: 23 December 2011 to 4 January 2012 .................................... 12 The Murle Attacks on Lou Nuer and Dinka Communities: 27 December 2011 to 4 February 2012 .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH SUDAN Food Security Monitoring: Phone Interviews in Greater Upper Nile
    mVAMSOUTH Bulletin SUDAN 1: March 2016 Bulletin 1: March 2016 SOUTH SUDAN Food Security Monitoring: phone interviews in Greater Upper Nile KEY MESSAGES Higher prices for food commodities and a reduced purchasing power were reported in Unity and Jonglei States; The highest proportion of internally displaced persons was registered in the counties of Twic East and Bor South (Jonglei), Maban and Malakal (Upper Nile) and Pariang, Guit and Abiemnhom (Unity); Respondents in Upper Nile have a more negative perception of their food security than those in Unity and Jongeli: food shortages, high prices and inadequate supplies are the main concerns among respondents. METHODOLOGY In February 2016, WFP SSCO conducted its first remote phone survey (mVAM) data collection in Greater Upper Nile. The survey primarily captured information on market functioning through key informant interviews with community leaders and/or opinion holders in payams with Greater Upper Nile. The data collection was conducted with the help of an in-house call center. Information on food availability and prices, labour wage rate, displacement and road access were was obtained from 26 counties in the Greater Upper Nile (eight each in Jonglei and Unity and 10 in Upper Nile) using a simplified market questionnaire. In order to reach out to as many key informants as possible, the phone interviews targeted all mobile providers both GSM and satellite phones (thurayas). It is notable important to note that some counties were completely not reached, primarily due to conflict and insecurity that has rendered phone coverage and general accessibility impossible. Furthermore, the respondents of to phone interviews are not representative of the community and can potentially bias findings.
    [Show full text]