Driven Setdown and Setup

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Driven Setdown and Setup JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 106, NO. C3, PAGES 4629-4638, MARCH 15, 2001 Field observationsof wave-driven setdown and setup B. Raubenheimer WoodsHole OceanographicInstitution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts R.T. Guza ScrippsInstitution of Oceanography,La Jolla,California SteveElgar WoodsHole OceanographicInstitution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts Abstract. Wave-drivensetdown and setupobserved for 3 monthson a cross-shoretransect between the shorelineand 5 rn water depth on a barred beach are comparedwith a theoreticalbalance between cross-shore gradients of the mean water level and the wave radiation stress.The observedsetdown, the depressionof the mean water level seaward of the surf zone, is predictedwell when radiation stressgradients are estimatedfrom the observationsusing linear theory at each location along the transect. The observed setdownalso agreeswith analyticalpredictions based on offshorewave observationsand the assumptionof linear,dissipationless, normally incident waves shoaling on alongshore homogeneousbathymetry. The observedsetup, the superelevationof the mean water level owing to wave breaking,is predictedaccurately in the outer and middle surf zone, but is increasinglyunderpredicted as the shorelineis approached.Similar to previous field studies,setup at a fixed cross-shorelocation increases with increasingoffshore wave height and is sensitiveto tidal fluctuationsin the local water depth and to bathymetric changes.Numerical simulationsand the observationssuggest that setupnear the shoreline dependson the bathymetryof the entire surf zone and increaseswith decreasingsurf zone beach slope,defined as the ratio of the surf zone-averagedwater depth to the surf zone width. A new empiricalformula for shorelinesetup on nonplanarbeaches incorporates this dependence. 1. Introduction whereE isthe wave energy, 0 is the wave direction, and Cg andC arethe group and phase velocities, respectively. Wave setdownand setupare changesin mean water level Thetheoretical balance (1), withSxx given by (2), is con- thataccompany shoaling and breaking surface gravity waves. sistentwith observationsin narrowwave flumes(where 0 With no alongshorevariations in wavesor bathymetryand = 0) with smooth,impermeable, fixed bottoms and planar negligiblewind and bottomstresses, the cross-shorepres- [Bowenet al., 1968], barred[Battjes and Janssen,1978; sure gradient associatedwith the time-averagedwave set- downand setup r/theoretically balances the cross-shoregra- Battjesand Stive, 1985], and other [Gourlay, 1992] depth profiles.Predictions of setupdiffer in detailbecause of dif- dientof thetime- anddepth-averaged onshore wave momen- tum flux (the waveradiation stress $•) [Longuet-Higginsferent model dependencies of $x• on localwave properties (e.g., linear or nonlineartheory) and differentformulations and Stewart, 1962], of theeffect of waverollers [e.g., Svendsen, 1984; Diegaard os• o• et al., 1991;Sch•iffer et al., 1993]. Ox + pg(v+ h) - 0 (• ) Thereare few fieldtests of the balance(1) usingconcur- rent observationsof both r/ and $• acrossthe surf zone. where x is the cross-shorecoordinate, h is the still water Battjesand Stive[1985] integrated(1) usinga wavetrans- depth, p is the water density,g is gravitationalaccelera- formationmodel to predict$•x andobtained good agree- tion, andfor linear,shoreward propagating, monochromatic ment with setupobserved in 2 and 4 m depthduring a waves, storm. Assumingthat the depthand setupvary linearly acrossthe beach,Lentz and Raubenheimer[1999] showed - , (2) thatthe setup measured for 3.5years in 2 m waterdepth was modeledqualitatively well by (1) with Sz• estimatedwith (2) usingwave measurements in 8 and2 m depths.However, Copyright2001 by theAmerican Geophysical Union. the assumptionsof lineardepth and setupvariations were Paper number 2000JC000572. shownto leadto integrationerrors as largeas 50% of the 0148-0227/01/2000JC000572509.00 observedsetup. More accuratesetup predictions with $x• 4629 4630 RAUBENHEIMER ET AL.' WAVE-DRIVEN SETDOWN AND SETUP and h estimatedfrom wave and bathymetrydata collected buried pressuregages (setup sensors) located between the alonga cross-shoretransect agreed well with setupobserved shorelineand about 5 m water depth (Figure 1, solid cir- for 2 monthsin 2 m water depth,even thoughthe setupmea- cles). The setuppressure sensors were buriedto avoidflow- surementswere madewith unburiedpressure sensors subject induceddeviations from hydrostaticpressure (see Appendix to flow-inducedmeasurement errors (see Appendix A) and A). After correctingfor temporalchanges in water density offset drift. [Lentzand Raubenheimer,1999] with conductivityand tem- Field measurementsshow that surf zone setupdepends on peraturemeasured in 5 m water depth, mean water levels the local waterdepth and the offshorewave height [Nielsen, were calculatedfrom 512 s (8.5 min) recordsby assuming 1988; King et al., 1990]. Field observationsof setupat the hydrostaticpressure. shoreline77shore suggest Setup(setdown) was defined as the increase(decrease) of the mean water level relative to that observed at the most 77shore-- cHs,o, (3) offshoresetup sensor (cross-shore location x = 58 m). The observedshoreline setup was estimatedas the setupwhere whereHs,0 is the offshoresignificant wave height and c is the total water depth was < 0.1 m. Note that 77shorewas a constant between about 0.2 and 0.3 [Hansen, 1978; Guza measuredonly when the shoreline,defined as the intersec- and Thornton, 1981; Nielsen, 1988; Hanslow et al., 1996]. tion of the mean water level with the beach,approximately This result is consistentwith (1) and (2) assuminga mono- coincidedwith a setupsensor location, which occurredat tonic beachslope, normally incidentlong waves,and surf mostonce per rising(and falling) tide. zone wave heightsthat are a constantfraction of the wa- At all but the shallowest three locations, sensor offset ter depth. However, scatterabout (3) is considerable(of- drifts (typically equivalentto about 0.03 m of water over ten greater than 100% of 77shore),possibly because natu- the 3 monthexperiment) were removedby subtractingfrom ral beachesoften are barred or alongshoreinhomogeneous, eachtime seriesa quadraticcurve fit to setupestimated at wavereflection may be largenear the shoreline,and the ratio 17 times when negligiblesetup or setdownwas expected of waveheight to waterdepth may dependon thebeach slope (H•,0 < 0.35 m andh > 2 m). In shallowerwater (x > 350 and wave conditions. Additionally, observedmean water m), drifts were removedby adjustingthe calculatedmean levelsnear the shoreline(in bothfield andlaboratory studies) waterlevels (using a quadraticfit) sothat setupand setdown canbe sensitiveto the measurementtechnique [e.g., Holland were negligiblefor small nonbreakingwaves (estimated as et al., 1995] and to the definition of setup [e.g., Gourla3; locationsand times when the ratio 78 of significantwave 1992]. heightH8 to total waterdepth h + 77was < 0.2) and so that In contrastto (3), Holman and Sallenger [1985] found the water level equaledsand level when the saturatedsand no correlationbetween video-basedestimates of 77shoreand aboveswash zone sensorsfirst wasexposed during rundown H•,0, butinstead suggested that 77shore/Hs,o increased with [Raubenheimeret al., 1995]. increasingIribarren number •0 = •/v/H•,o/Lo, where• is the foreshorebeach slope and L0 is the offshorewave- ....... I ......... I ......... I ......... length of the spectralpeak frequency. Scatterin this rela- ß tionshipwas reduced by separatingthe resultsinto low, mid- dle, and high tidal stages,and it was hypothesizedthat the offshorebar morphologyinfluenced the low-tide shoreline setup. However,the observationsof Nielsen [1988] showed little effect of the offshorebarred bathymetry on the setup, and thus the importanceof barredbathymetry to 77shoreis _ uncertain. Here the balance (1) is tested with field observationsof waves and time-averagedwater levels measuredbetween the -4 shorelineand about5 m water depthon a barredbeach. Wa- ter levels are estimatedwith buried,stable pressure sensors. -6 Setdownand setupup are predictedby integrating(1) with 400 300 200 1 O0 0 Sxx basedon (2) usingthe wave observations.The observed Gross-shore Lo½ofionx(rn) setdownis consistentwith (1). Similar to Lentz and Rauben- heimer[1999], setupis predictedwell in 2 m waterdepth, Figure 1. Locationsof deeplyburied pressure sensors used butthe balance breaks down in depthsshallower than about to measuresetup (solid circles), colocated unburied pres- 1m. Setup near the shoreline isshown tobe sensitive tothe suresensors, current meters, and sonar altimeters (open cir- surfzone bathymetry andtidal fluctuations. cles),near-bed pressure sensors (open diamonds), andthe conductivitysensor (asterisk). The most seaward11 setup sensorswere accurateParoscientific gages. All pressure 2. Field Experiment and Data Processing measurementswere corrected for temperatureeffects. The solidcurves are selectedbeach profiles measured between 1 Observationswere acquired from Septemberthrough September and 31 November.The thick black curve is the November1997 on a sandyAtlantic Ocean beach near Duck, 13 Septemberprofile. The x axisis positiveonshore with the North Carolina. Bottompressure was measuredwith 12 originat thelocation of theoffshore sensor. RAUBENHEIMER ET AL.' WAVE-DRIVEN SETDOWN AND SETUP 4631 Beach profiles were surveyedevery few days with an Table 1. Least SquaresLinear Fits (With Intercept a and amphibiousvehicle, and seafloorelevations were measured Slopeb) of SetupPredictions
Recommended publications
  • Two-Soliton Interaction As an Elementary Act of Soliton Turbulence in Integrable Systems
    Two-soliton interaction as an elementary act of soliton turbulence in integrable systems E.N. Pelinovsky1,2, E.G. Shurgalina2, A.V. Sergeeva1, T.G. Talipova1, 3 3 G.A. El ∗ and R.H.J. Grimshaw 1 Department of Nonlinear Geophysical Processes, Institute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia 2 Department of Applied Mathematics, Nizhny Novgorod Technical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia 3 Department of Mathematical Sciences, Loughborough University, UK ∗Corresponding author. Tel: +44 1509 222869; Fax: +44 1509 223969; e-mail: [email protected] 1 Abstract Two-soliton interactions play a definitive role in the formation of the structure of soliton turbulence in integrable systems. To quantify the contribution of these interactions to the dynamical and statistical characteristics of the nonlinear wave field of soliton turbulence we study properties of the spatial moments of the two-soliton solution of the Korteweg – de Vries (KdV) equation. While the first two moments are integrals of the KdV evolution, the third and fourth moments undergo significant variations in the dominant interaction region, which could have strong effect on the values of the skewness and kurtosis in soliton turbulence. Keywords: KdV equation, soliton, turbulence 1 Introduction Solitons represent an intrinsic part of nonlinear wave field in weakly dispersive media and their deterministic dynamics in the framework of the Korteweg– de Vries (KdV) equation is understood very well (see e.g.[1, 2, 3]). At the same time, description of statistical properties of a random ensemble of solitons (or a more general problem of the KdV evolution of a random wave field) still remains to a large extent an unsolved problem, especially in the context of concrete physical applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustic Nonlinearity in Dispersive Solids
    ACOUSTIC NONLINEARITY IN DISPERSIVE SOLIDS John H. Cantrell and William T. Yost NASA Langley Research Center Mail Stop 231 Hampton, VA 23665-5225 INTRODUCTION It is well known that the interatomic anharmonicity of the propagation medium gives rise to the generation of harmonics of an initially sinusoidal acoustic waveform. It is, perhaps, less well appreciated that the anharmonicity also gives rise to the generation of a static or "dc" component of the propagating waveform. We have previously shown [1,2] that the static component is intrinsically linked to the acoustic (Boussinesq) radiation stress in the material. For nondispersive solids theory predicts that a propagating gated continuous waveform (acoustic toneburst) generates a static displacement pulse having the shape of a right-angled triangle, the slope of which is linearly proportional to the magnitude and sign of the acoustic nonlinearity parameter of the propagation medium. Such static displacement pulses have been experimentally verified in single crystal silicon [3] and germanium [4]. The purpose of the present investigation is to consider the effects of dispersion on the generation of the static acoustic wave component. It is well known that an initial disturbance in media which have both sufficiently large dispersion and nonlinearity can evolve into a series of solitary waves or solitons [5]. We consider here that an acoustic tone burst may be modeled as a modulated continuous waveform and that the generated initial static displacement pulse may be viewed as a modulation-confined disturbance. In media with sufficiently large dispersion and nonlinearity the static displacement pulse may be expected to evolve into a series of modulation solitons.
    [Show full text]
  • Tllllllll:. Journal of Coastal Research, 17(4),919-930
    Journal of Coastal Research 919-930 West Palm Beach, Florida Fall 2001 Obliquely Incident Wave Reflection and Runup on Steep Rough Slope Nobuhisa Kobayashi and Entin A. Karjadi Center for Applied Coastal Research University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716 ABSTRACT _ KOBAYASHI, N. and KARJADI, E.A., 2001. Obliquely incident wave reflection and runup on steep rough slope. .tllllllll:. Journal of Coastal Research, 17(4),919-930. West Palm Beach (Florida), ISSN 0749-0208. ~ A two-dimensional, time-dependent numerical model for finite amplitude, shallow-water waves with arbitrary incident eusss~~ angles is developed to predict the detailed wave motions in the vicinity of the still waterline on a slope. The numerical --+4 method and the seaward and landward boundary algorithms are fairly general but the lateral boundary algorithm is b--- limited to periodic boundary conditions. The computed results for surging waves on a rough 1:2.5 slope are presented for the incident wave angles in the range 0-80°. The time-averaged continuity, momentum and energy equations are used to check the accuracy of the numerical model as well as to examine the cross-shore variations of wave setup, return current, longshore current, momentum fluxes, energy fluxes and dissipation rates. The computed reflected waves and waterline oscillations are shown to have the same alongshore wavelength as the specified nonlinear inci­ dent waves. The computed variations of the reflected wave phase shift and wave runup are shown to be consistent with available empirical formulas. More quantitative comparisons will be required to evaluate the model accuracy. ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS: Oblique waves, reflection, runup, revetments, breakwaters, wave setup, return current, longshore current.
    [Show full text]
  • Part II-1 Water Wave Mechanics
    Chapter 1 EM 1110-2-1100 WATER WAVE MECHANICS (Part II) 1 August 2008 (Change 2) Table of Contents Page II-1-1. Introduction ............................................................II-1-1 II-1-2. Regular Waves .........................................................II-1-3 a. Introduction ...........................................................II-1-3 b. Definition of wave parameters .............................................II-1-4 c. Linear wave theory ......................................................II-1-5 (1) Introduction .......................................................II-1-5 (2) Wave celerity, length, and period.......................................II-1-6 (3) The sinusoidal wave profile...........................................II-1-9 (4) Some useful functions ...............................................II-1-9 (5) Local fluid velocities and accelerations .................................II-1-12 (6) Water particle displacements .........................................II-1-13 (7) Subsurface pressure ................................................II-1-21 (8) Group velocity ....................................................II-1-22 (9) Wave energy and power.............................................II-1-26 (10)Summary of linear wave theory.......................................II-1-29 d. Nonlinear wave theories .................................................II-1-30 (1) Introduction ......................................................II-1-30 (2) Stokes finite-amplitude wave theory ...................................II-1-32
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Wave Setup Over a Steeply Sloping Fringing Reef
    DECEMBER 2015 B U C K L E Y E T A L . 3005 Dynamics of Wave Setup over a Steeply Sloping Fringing Reef MARK L. BUCKLEY AND RYAN J. LOWE School of Earth and Environment, and The Oceans Institute, and ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia JEFF E. HANSEN School of Earth and Environment, and The Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia AP R. VAN DONGEREN Unit ZKS, Department AMO, Deltares, Delft, Netherlands (Manuscript received 6 April 2015, in final form 8 September 2015) ABSTRACT High-resolution observations from a 55-m-long wave flume were used to investigate the dynamics of wave setup over a steeply sloping reef profile with a bathymetry representative of many fringing coral reefs. The 16 runs incorporating a wide range of offshore wave conditions and still water levels were conducted using a 1:36 scaled fringing reef, with a 1:5 slope reef leading to a wide and shallow reef flat. Wave setdown and setup observations measured at 17 locations across the fringing reef were compared with a theoretical balance between the local cross-shore pressure and wave radiation stress gradients. This study found that when ra- diation stress gradients were calculated from observations of the radiation stress derived from linear wave theory, both wave setdown and setup were underpredicted for the majority of wave and water level conditions tested. These underpredictions were most pronounced for cases with larger wave heights and lower still water levels (i.e., cases with the greatest setdown and setup).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Reflectance of Uniform Slopes for Normally Incident Interfacial Solitary Waves
    1156 JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY VOLUME 37 On the Reflectance of Uniform Slopes for Normally Incident Interfacial Solitary Waves DANIEL BOURGAULT Department of Physics and Physical Oceanography, Memorial University, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada DANIEL E. KELLEY Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (Manuscript received 29 March 2005, in final form 2 September 2006) ABSTRACT The collision of interfacial solitary waves with sloping boundaries may provide an important energy source for mixing in coastal waters. Collision energetics have been studied in the laboratory for the idealized case of normal incidence upon uniform slopes. Before these results can be recast into an ocean parameter- ization, contradictory laboratory findings must be addressed, as must the possibility of a bias owing to laboratory sidewall effects. As a first step, the authors have revisited the laboratory results in the context of numerical simulations performed with a nonhydrostatic laterally averaged model. It is shown that the simulations and the laboratory measurements match closely, but only for simulations that incorporate sidewall friction. More laboratory measurements are called for, but in the meantime the numerical simu- lations done without sidewall friction suggest a tentative parameterization of the reflectance of interfacial solitary waves upon impact with uniform slopes. 1. Introduction experiments addressed the idealized case of normally incident ISWs on uniform shoaling slopes in an other- Diverse observational case studies suggest that the wise motionless fluid with two-layer stratification. The breaking of high-frequency interfacial solitary waves results of these experiments showed that the fraction of (ISWs) on sloping boundaries may be an important ISW energy that gets reflected back to the source after generator of vertical mixing in coastal waters (e.g., impinging the sloping boundary depends on the ratio of MacIntyre et al.
    [Show full text]
  • NWS Melbourne Marine Web Letter August 2013 (For Marine Forecast Questions 24/7: Call 321-255-0212, Ext
    NWS Melbourne Marine Web Letter August 2013 (For Marine Forecast Questions 24/7: call 321-255-0212, ext. 2) Marine Links relevant to East Central Florida Buoy 41010 It is hoped that this buoy, which went adrift in February, will be redeployed by mid to late September. Additional Marine Observations I’ve added a web page that has most of the marine observations along the east coast. http://www.srh.noaa.gov/mlb/?n=marob Note that wind/wave data became available at Sebastian Inlet via the National Data Buoy Center earlier this year. There are also some web cams with wind data. One, at Jensen Beach, has wave data too. Upwelling Some on again, off again upwelling occurred over the continental shelf this summer. This is not unusual. South to southeast winds (near shore parallel) are the primary cause of periodic upwelling. In some years, these winds are persistent and stronger than normal, which produces more prolific upwelling. In 2003, water temps in the upper 50s occurred in mid August at Daytona Beach! Typically the upwelling diminishes by late August or September. Nearshore Wave Prediction System We will soon upgrade our nearshore wave model (SWAN) to the Nearshore Wave Prediction System (NWPS). One enhancement is that Gulf Stream data will be incorporated back into the wave model. This will allow us to give better estimates for the position of the west wall of the Gulf Stream. The wave model will again be able to generate higher wave heights in the Gulf Stream during northerly wind surges. Hopefully, this functionality will be ready by Fall when cold fronts start moving through again.
    [Show full text]
  • Swash Zone Based Reflection During Energetic Wave Conditions at a Dissipative Beach: Toward a Wave-By-Wave Approach
    SWASH ZONE BASED REFLECTION DURING ENERGETIC WAVE CONDITIONS AT A DISSIPATIVE BEACH: TOWARD A WAVE-BY-WAVE APPROACH Rafael Almar1, Patricio Catalán2, Raimundo Ibaceta2, Chris Blenkinsopp3, Rodrigo Cienfuegos4, Mauricio Villagrán4,5, Juan Carlos Aguilera4 and Bruno Castelle6 This paper presents a 11-day experiment conducted at the high-energy dissipative beach of Mataquito, Maule Region, Chile. During the experiment, offshore significant wave height ranged 1-4 m, with persistent long period up to 18 s and oblique incidence. Wave energy reflection value ranged from 1 to 4 %, and results show that it is highly linked to both incoming wave characteristics and swash zone beach slope, and is well correlated to a swash-slope based Iribarren number. The swash acting as a low-pass filter in the reflection mechanism, our results show that the cut-off period is better determined by swash slope rather than incoming wave's period. A new low cost technique for observing high-frequency swash hydro-morphodynamics is introduced and validated using LIDAR measurements. A good agreement is found. Separation of uprush and backswash components using the Radon Transform illustrates the low-frequency filtering effect. These results show the key role played by swash mechanism in the reflection rate and frequency selection. More investigation is needed to describe the reflection process and its link with shoreface evolution, moving toward a swash-by-swash approach. Keywords: Mataquito, Maule Region, Chile; beach reflection; incoming and outgoing wave separation; swash measurements technique; video; Lidar INTRODUCTION There is a potential for substantial wave reflection at the coast, depending on hydro- and morphodynamic conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 216 Extreme Water Levels, Wave Runup And
    CHAPTER 216 EXTREME WATER LEVELS, WAVE RUNUP AND COASTAL EROSION P. Ruggiero1 , P.D. Komar2, W.G. McDougal1 and R.A. Beach2 ABSTRACT A probabilistic model has been developed to analyze the susceptibilities of coastal properties to wave attack. Using an empirical model for wave runup, long term data of measured tides and waves are combined with beach morphology characteristics to determine the frequency of occurrence of sea cliff and dune erosion along the Oregon coast. Extreme runup statistics have been characterized for the high energy dissipative conditions common in Oregon, and have been found to depend simply on the deep-water significant wave height. Utilizing this relationship, an extreme-value probability distribution has been constructed for a 15 year total water elevation time series, and recurrence intervals of potential erosion events are calculated. The model has been applied to several sites along the Oregon coast, and the results compare well with observations of erosional impacts. INTRODUCTION Much of the Oregon coast is characterized by wide, dissipative, sandy beaches, which are backed by either large sea cliffs or sand dunes. This dynamic coast typically experiences a very intense winter wave climate, and there have been many documented cases of dramatic, yet episodic, sea cliff and dune erosion (Komar and Shih, 1993). A typical response of property owners following such erosion events is to build large coastal protection structures. Often these structures are built after a single erosion event, which is followed by a long period with no significant wave attack. From a coastal management perspective, it is of interest to be able to predict the expected frequency and intensity of such erosion events to determine if a coastal structure is an appropriate response.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPLORING DEEP SEA HYDROTHERMAL VENTS on EARTH and OCEAN WORLDS. P. Sobron1,2, L. M. Barge3, the Invader Team. 1Impossible Sensing, St
    52nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2021 (LPI Contrib. No. 2548) 2505.pdf EXPLORING DEEP SEA HYDROTHERMAL VENTS ON EARTH AND OCEAN WORLDS. P. Sobron1,2, L. M. Barge3, the InVADER Team. 1Impossible Sensing, St. Louis, MO ([email protected]) 2SETI Institute, Mtn. View, CA, , 3Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA The Mission: InVADER (In-situ Vent Analysis precipitates showing exposed minerals and organic Divebot for Exobiology Research, Figure 4.1, content. The UNOLS ROV will use our coring tool and https://invader-mission.org/) is NASA’s most advanced its own manipulator and cameras to take ground truth subsea sensing payload, a tightly integrated imaging and samples as part of the InVADER deplotment. laser Raman spectroscopy/laser-induced breakdown In contrast to existing methods, InVADER allows spectroscopy/laser induced native fluorescence in-situ, autonomous, non-destructive measurements of instrument capable of in-situ, rapid, long-term these vent characteristics. InVADER will fill these gaps, underwater analyses of vent fluid and precipitates. and advance readiness in vent exploration on Earth and Such analyses are critical for finding and studying Ocean Worlds by simplifying operational strategies for life and life’s precursors at vent systems on Ocean identifying and characterizing seafloor environments. Worlds. To demonstrate the scientific potential and We will use statistical analysis tools for the fusion of functionality of the instrument, in July 2021 our team multi-sensor datasets, and develop real-time science will deploy InVADER on the Ocean Observatories data evaluation and payload control routines to Initiative’s (OOI) Regional Cabled Array (RCA), a establish, and then validate, adaptive science operations power/data distribution network off the Oregon coast, at strategies that maximize science return in a mission-like the underwater hydrothermal systems of Axial scenario.
    [Show full text]
  • Significant Dissipation of Tidal Energy in the Deep Ocean Inferred from Satellite Altimeter Data
    letters to nature 3. Rein, M. Phenomena of liquid drop impact on solid and liquid surfaces. Fluid Dynamics Res. 12, 61± water is created at high latitudes12. It has thus been suggested that 93 (1993). much of the mixing required to maintain the abyssal strati®cation, 4. Fukai, J. et al. Wetting effects on the spreading of a liquid droplet colliding with a ¯at surface: experiment and modeling. Phys. Fluids 7, 236±247 (1995). and hence the large-scale meridional overturning, occurs at 5. Bennett, T. & Poulikakos, D. Splat±quench solidi®cation: estimating the maximum spreading of a localized `hotspots' near areas of rough topography4,16,17. Numerical droplet impacting a solid surface. J. Mater. Sci. 28, 963±970 (1993). modelling studies further suggest that the ocean circulation is 6. Scheller, B. L. & Bous®eld, D. W. Newtonian drop impact with a solid surface. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 18 41, 1357±1367 (1995). sensitive to the spatial distribution of vertical mixing . Thus, 7. Mao, T., Kuhn, D. & Tran, H. Spread and rebound of liquid droplets upon impact on ¯at surfaces. Am. clarifying the physical mechanisms responsible for this mixing is Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 43, 2169±2179, (1997). important, both for numerical ocean modelling and for general 8. de Gennes, P. G. Wetting: statics and dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 827±863 (1985). understanding of how the ocean works. One signi®cant energy 9. Hayes, R. A. & Ralston, J. Forced liquid movement on low energy surfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 159, 429±438 (1993). source for mixing may be barotropic tidal currents.
    [Show full text]
  • Circulation-Wave Coupling with a Wave Parameterization for the Idealized California Coastal Region
    Circulation-Wave Coupling With a Wave Parameterization For the Idealized California Coastal Region Le Ly and Curt Collins Dept. of Oceanography Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, CA 93043 1. Introduction atmospheric model), POM (Princeton Ocean Momentum and energy transfers across the air- Model; Blumberg and Mellor, 1987), and WAM sea interface under realistic ocean conditions are wave model (Wilczak et al., 1999), and an important not only in theoretical studies, but also atmosphere-POM-WAM for the Mediterranean in many applications including marine region (Lionello et al., 1999). atmospheric and oceanic forecasts and climate Based on a new concept of oceanic turbulence modeling on all scales. Surface breaking waves and a wave breaking condition of the linear wave are believed to be an important supplier of theory, a surface wave parameterization is turbulent energy besides shear production of the developed and presented. This wave classical turbulence theory. Waves contain a parameterization with wave-dependent roughness considerable amount of momentum and energy, is tested against available data on wave- and they redistribute these quantities over great dependent turbulence dissipation, roughness distances. Wind waves supply energy for length, drag coefficient, and momentum fluxes turbulence due to breaking. Ocean waves strongly using a coupled air-wave-sea model. We also effect the air-sea system on all scale. A part of the present a circulation-wave coupling study using a energy and momentum is transferred directly wave dependent roughness (Ly and Garwood, from the atmosphere to ocean currents while 2000) and taking the wind-wave-turbulence- another part is transferred to surface waves. The current relationship into account.
    [Show full text]