DOCSLIB.ORG

Joint Operational Programme Romania – Ukraine 2014-2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Joint Operational Programme Romania – Ukraine 2014-2020 Managing Authority Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration Joint Operational Programme Romania – Ukraine 2014-2020 FIRST DRAFT Bucharest, January 2015 This document is subject to modifications and will be submitted to the JPC for aproval in March 2015. 1 Abbreviations CBC – Cross Border Cooperation CC – County Council DG DEVCO – Europe Aid Development and Cooperation EaP – Eastern Partnership EC – European Commission ENI – European Neighbourhood Instrument ENPI – European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument EP – European Parliament EU – European Union GIZ – German Society for International Cooperation JOP – Joint Operational Programme JOP RO-UA-MD – Joint Operational Programme Romania – Ukraine - Republic of Moldova JPC – Joint Programming Committee JTC – Joint Technical Secretariat HCOP – Human Capital Operational Programme LIPs – Large Infrastructure Projects MA – Management Authority MC – Municipal Council MD – Republic of Moldova MEF – Ministry of European Funds MFA – Ministry of Foreign Affairs MRDPA – Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration NGO – Non Governmental Organisation NPRD – The National Programme for Rural Development NE – North-East NRP – National Reform Program NUTS – Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics OP – Operational Programme OPAC – Operational Programme Administrative Capacity OPLI – Operational Programme Large Infrastructure OPC – Operational Programme Competitiveness ODA – Official Development Assistance PA – Partnership Agreement RA – Regional Authority R&D – Research and Development RO – Romania ROP – Regional Operational Programme SIDA – Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency SME – Small and Medium Enterprises SWOT – Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats analysis TWG – Thematic working groups TA – Technical Assistance TO – Thematic Objectives UA – Ukraine USAID – United States Agency for International Development 2 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 5 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROGRAMME AREA ................................................................................... 8 2.1. CORE REGIONS ...................................................................................................................... 8 2.2. MAJOR SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL CENTRES ....................................................... 11 2.3. FLEXIBILITY RULE ................................................................................................................. 11 2.4. PROGRAMME MAP .............................................................................................................. 11 3. PROGRAMME STRATEGY ............................................................................................................. 12 3.1. STRATEGY DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................... 12 3.2. JUSTIFICATION OF THE CHOSEN STRATEGY ........................................................................ 17 3.2.1. SOCIO ECONOMIC AND SWOT ANALYSES ................................................................... 17 3.2.2. COHERENCE ANALYSIS ................................................................................................. 37 3.2.3. MULTI CRITERIA ANALYSIS .......................................................................................... 52 3.2.4. PAST EXPERIENCE ANALYSIS ........................................................................................ 54 3.2.5. SUMMARY OF STRATEGY IDENTIFICATION ................................................................. 55 3.3. RISK ANALYSIS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ..................................................................... 57 3.4. PROGRAMME INDICATORS ................................................................................................. 60 3.5. CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES ...................................................................................................... 64 4. STRUCTURES AND APPOINTMENT OF THE COMPETENT AUTHORITIES AND MANAGEMENT BODIES ................................................................................................................................................. 66 4.1. JOINT MONITORING COMMITTEE (JMC) ............................................................................. 66 4.2.1 COMPOSITION OF JOINT MONNITORING COMMITTEE .............................................. 66 4.2.2 FUNCTIONING OF THE JOINT MONITORING COMMITTEE .......................................... 67 4.2.3 TASKS OF THE JOINT MONITORING COMMITTEE ....................................................... 67 4.2. MANAGING AUTHORITY ...................................................................................................... 67 4.2.1 DESIGNATION PROCES ................................................................................................ 67 4.2.2 FUNCTIONS OF THE MANAGING AUTHORITY ............................................................. 68 4.3. NATIONAL AUTHORITIES OF ROMANIA AND UKRAINE ....................................................... 69 4.4. JOINT TECHNICAL SECRETARIAT, AND BRANCH OFFICES .................................................... 70 4.5. AUDIT AUTHORITY ............................................................................................................... 70 4.6. CONTROL CONTACT POINT ................................................................................................. 70 5. PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION ............................................................................................... 71 5.1. MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL SYSTEM ............................................................................. 71 5.2. TIME FRAME FOR PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION .......................................................... 71 5.3. PROJECT SELECTION PROCEDURES ..................................................................................... 71 5.4. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ...................................................................................................... 71 3 5.5. COMMUNICATION STRATEGY ............................................................................................. 72 5.6. SEA ....................................................................................................................................... 72 5.7. INDICATIVE FINANCIAL PLAN .............................................................................................. 72 5.8. RULES OF ELIGIBILITY........................................................................................................... 72 5.9. APPORTIONMENT OF LIABILITIES ........................................................................................ 73 5.10. RULES OF TRANSFER, USE AND MONITORING ................................................................ 73 5.11. IT SYSTEMS FOR REPORTING ........................................................................................... 73 5.12. LANGUAGE OF THE PROGRAMME .................................................................................. 73 4 1. INTRODUCTION Cross border cooperation at the external borders of the EU continues to represent a top priority for the European Union during the 2014-2020 programming period. The cross border cooperation under the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) will create added value for the border regions building on its predecessor, the ENPI. The ENI CBC aims to create “an area of shared prosperity and good neighbourliness between EU Member States and their neighbours”. To this purpose the ENI has three strategic objectives: (A) promote economic and social development in regions on both sides of common borders; (B) address common challenges in environment, public health, safety and security; (C) promotion of better conditions and modalities for ensuring the mobility of persons, goods and capital. Each programme has to address at least one of the strategic objectives. Additionally, in order to generate a significant impact for the border area each programme has to focus its strategic intervention in the area on a maximum of four thematic objectives from the following: 1. Business and SME development (Strategic objective: A) 2. Support to education, research, technological development and innovation (Strategic objective: A) 3. Promotion of local culture and preservation of historical heritage (Strategic objective: A) 4. Promotion of social inclusion and fight against poverty (Strategic objectives: A, B, C) 5. Support to local & regional good governance (Strategic objectives: A, B, C) 6. Environmental protection, climate change adaptation (Strategic objective: B) 7. Improvement of accessibility to the regions, development of transport and communication networks and systems (Strategic objective: C) 8. Common challenges in the field of safety and security (Strategic objective: B) 9. Promotion of energy cooperation (Strategic objective: B) 10. Promotion of border management, and border security (Strategic objective: C) In the general framework created by the Programming Document 2014-2020, EU Regulation 232/2014 establishing a European Neighbourhood Instrument and of the Commission Regulation no 897/2014 laying down specific provisions for the implementation of cross-border cooperation programmes financed under Regulation 232/2014, the programme partners have cooperated in order to identify the needs of the programme area and select
Load more

Recommended publications
  • XXIX Danube Conference
    XXIX Danube Conference XXIX Conference of the Danubian Countries on Hydrological Forecasting and Hydrological Bases of Water Management September 6–8, 2021 ISBN 978-80-7653-017-1 Brno Czech Hydrometeorological Institute Czech National Committee for UNESCO Intergovernmental Hydrological Programme Danube XXIX Conference of the Danubian Countries on Hydrological Forecasting and Hydrological Bases of Water Management Conference proceedings Extended abstracts September 6–8, 2021 Brno, Czech Republic Prague 2021 Organized by Under the auspices of Czech National Committee for UNESCO Intergovernmental Hydrological Programme Danube Co-organizers Czech National Committee for Hydrology CREA Hydro & Energy Povodí Moravy Czech Scientific and Technical Water Management Company Technical University of Vienna University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering © Czech Hydrometeorological Institute ISBN 978-80-7653-020-1 2 XXIX Conference of the Danubian Countries, September 6–8, 2021, Brno, the Czech Republic Obsah Introductory word .................................................................................................................... 8 TOPIC 1 DATA: TRADITIONAL & EMERGING, MEASUREMENT, MANAGEMENT & ANALYSIS ............................................................................................ 9 Estimation of design discharges in terms of seasonality and length of time series .......... 10 Veronika Bačová MITKOVÁ Modelling snow water equivalent storage and snowmelt across Europe with a simple degree-day model ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TABLE of CONTENTS Estimation of the Long-Term Cyclical Fluctuations Of
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Estimation of the long-term cyclical fluctuations of snow-rain floods in the Danube basin within Ukraine Tetiana ZABOLOTNIA, Liudmyla GORBACHOVA, Borys KHRYSTIUK 3 Multi-annual variability of global solar radiation in the agricultural area of Lower Silesia (SW Poland) and its relationship with the North Atlantic Oscillation Krystyna BRYŚ, Tadeusz BRYŚ 13 Sensitivities of the Tiedtke and Kain-Fritsch Convection Schemes for RegCM4.5 over West Africa Mojisola Oluwayemisi ADENIYI 27 Water vapor induced airborne rotational features Roman MARKS 39 Learning to cope with water variability through participatory monitoring: the case study of the mountainous region, Nepal Santosh REGMI, Jagat K. BHUSAL, Praju GURUNG, Zed ZULKAFLI, Timothy KARPOUZOGLOU, Boris Ochoa TOCACHI, Wouter BUYTAERT, Feng MAO 49 Long-term seasonal characterization and evolution of extreme drought and flooding variability in northwest Algeria Kouidri SOFIANE, Megnounif ABDESSELAM, Ghenim Abderrahmane NEKKACHE 63 Homogeneous regionalization via L-moments for Mumbai City, India Amit Sharad PARCHURE, Shirish Kumar GEDAM 73 After COP24 Conference in Katowice – the role of the Institute of Meteorology and Water Management – National Research Institute in connection of hydrological and meteorological measurements and observations with climate change adaptation actions Marta BARSZCZEWSKA, Ksawery SKĄPSKI 85 Vol. 7 Issue 2 June 2019 Estimation of the long-term cyclical fluctuations of snow-rain floods in the Danube basin within Ukraine Tetiana Zabolotnia, Liudmyla Gorbachova, Borys Khrystiuk Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute, Prospekt Nauki 37, 03028 Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. Floods are a periodic natural phenomenon, often accompanied by negative consequences for the local population and the economy as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphologic Effects of Human Impact Across the Svydovets Massif in the Eastern Carpathians in Ukraine
    PL ISSN 0081-6434 studia geomorphologica carpatho-balcanica vol. liii – liV, 2019 – 2020 : 85 – 111 1 1 1 3 PIOTR KŁapYTA , KaZimier2 Z KrZemieŃ , elŻBIETA GORCZYca , PAWeŁ KrĄŻ , lidia dubis (KraKÓW, lViV) GEOMORPHOLOGIC EFFECTS OF HUMAN IMPACT ACROSS THE SVYDOVETS MASSIF IN THE EASTERN CARPATHIANS IN UKRAINE Abstract - : contemporary changes in the natural environment in many mountain areas, espe cially those occurring above the upper tree line, are related to tourism. the svydovets massif,- located in the eastern carpathians in ukraine, is a good example of an area that is currently experiencing intense degradation. the highest, ne part of this area is crisscrossed with nu merous paths, tourist routes, and ski trails. the strong human impact the area experiences is occurring simultaneously with the activity of natural geomorphologic processes. the processes occur with the greatest intensity above the upper tree line.th the development of the discussed- area has been occurring gradually since the early 20 century. it started when the region belonged to austria-hungary, then czechoslovakia, and subsequently the ussr. now that it be longs to independent ukraine the level of tourism-related development has sharply increased. comparing it to other mountain areas, such as the tatras, the alps, or the monts dore massif in France, the svydovets massif is being reshaped much more rapidly due to the damage caused byKeywords human impact. : human impact, tourism-related deterioration of mountains, high mountains, svydovets, eastern carpathians, ukraine INTRODUCTION - man plays a huge role in the reshaping of the geographic environment and hu man activity is especially noticeable in the mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Potential of the Western Ukrainian Borderland
    Journal of Geography, Politics and Society 2017, 7(2), 17–23 DOI 10.4467/24512249JG.17.011.6627 HUMAN POTENTIAL OF THE WESTERN UKRAINIAN BORDERLAND Iryna Hudzelyak (1), Iryna Vanda (2) (1) Chair of Economic and Social Geography, Faculty of Geography, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Doroshenka 41, 79000 Lviv, Ukraine, e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author) (2) Chair of Economic and Social Geography, Faculty of Geography, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Doroshenka 41, 79000 Lviv, Ukraine, e-mail: [email protected] Citation Hudzelyak I., Vanda I., 2017, Human potential of the Western Ukrainian borderland, Journal of Geography, Politics and Society, 7(2), 17–23. Abstract This article contains the analysis made with the help of generalized quantative parameters, which shows the tendencies of hu- man potential formation of the Western Ukrainian borderland during 2001–2016. The changes of number of urban and rural population in eighteen borderland rayons in Volyn, Lviv and Zakarpattia oblasts are evaluated. The tendencies of urbanization processes and resettlement of rural population are described. Spatial differences of age structure of urban and rural population are characterized. Key words Western Ukrainian borderland, human potential, population, depopulation, aging of population. 1. Introduction during the period of closed border had more so- cial influence from the West, which formed specific Ukraine has been going through the process of model of demographic behavior and reflected in dif- depopulation for some time; it was caused with ferent features of the human potential. significant reduction in fertility and essential mi- The category of human potential was developed gration losses of reproductive cohorts that lasted in economic science and conceptually was related almost a century.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukrainian Literature
    UKRAINIAN LITERATURE A Journal of Translations Volume 3 2011 Ukrainian Literature A Journal of Translations Editor Maxim Tarnawsky Manuscript Editor Uliana Pasicznyk Editorial Board Taras Koznarsky, Askold Melnyczuk, Michael M. Naydan, Marko Pavlyshyn www.UkrainianLiterature.org Ukrainian Literature is published by the Shevchenko Scientific Society, Inc., 63 Fourth Avenue, New York, NY 10003, U.S.A. (tel.) 212–254–5130; (fax) 212–254–5239. Ukrainian Literature publishes translations into English of works of Ukrainian literature. The journal appears triennially both on the internet (www.UkrainianLiterature.org) and in a print edition. A mirror of the internet edition appears at www.shevchenko.org/Ukr_Lit. Ukrainian Literature welcomes submissions from translators. Translators who wish to submit translations for consideration should contact the editor by e-mail at [email protected]. Correspondence relating to subscriptions and the distribution of the printed journal should be addressed to the publisher (Shevchenko Scientific Society, Inc., 63 Fourth Avenue, New York, NY 10003, U.S.A.; tel.: 212–254–5130; fax: 212–254–5239). In matters relating to the content of the journal, its editorial policies, or to the internet version, please contact the editor by e- mail at [email protected]. ISSN 1552-5880 (online edition) ISSN 1552-5872 (print edition) Publication of this volume was made possible by a grant from the Ivan and Elizabeth Chlopecky Fund of the Shevchenko Scientific Society (USA). Copyright © Shevchenko Scientific Society,
    [Show full text]
  • Floodsite Project Report D22.3
    Integrated Flood Risk Analysis and Management Methodologies Scenario Analysis THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BASIN WIDE SYSTEM OF FLOOD WARNING Date April 2008 Report Number Revision Number 3_2_P28 Task Leader VITUKI, Budapest FLOODsite is co-funded by the European Community Sixth Framework Programme for European Research and Technological Development (2002-2006) FLOODsite is an Integrated Project in the Global Change and Eco-systems Sub-Priority Start date March 2004, duration 5 Years Document Dissemination Level PU Public PU PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) Co-ordinator: HR Wallingford, UK Project Contract No: GOCE-CT-2004-505420 Project website: www.floodsite.net Tisza Basin Flood Warning M22.2 Contract No:GOCE-CT-2004-505420 DOCUMENT INFORMATION Report on the development of the basin wide integrated system of Title monitoring, flood forecasting and warning Authors Péter Bartha Contributors Péter Bakonyi, Gábor Bálint, Balázs Gauzer, Károly Konecsny Distribution Public Document Reference T22-09-02 DOCUMENT HISTORY Date Revision Prepared by Organisation Approved by Notes 10/03/07 1_1_P21 PEB VITUKI Initial draft 10/01/08 2_1_P30 PEB VITUKI Draft 10/04/08 2_2_P28 PEB VITUKI final draft 28/02/09 3_2_P28 GAB VITUKI final 10/06/09 3_2_P28 Paul Samuels HR Formatting and filename Wallingford ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The work described in this publication was supported by the European Community’s Sixth Framework Programme through the grant to the budget of the Integrated Project FLOODsite, Contract GOCE-CT- 2004-505420.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Mean Annual River Runoff in the Ukrainian Carpathian Region
    22 Environmental Research, Engineering and Management 2020/76/2 Mapping the Mean Annual River Runoff in the EREM 76/2 Ukrainian Carpathian Region Journal of Environmental Research, Engineering and Management Vol. 76 / No. 2 / 2020 Received 2018/06 Accepted after revision 2020/06 pp. 22–33 DOI 10.5755/j01.erem.76.2.20916 http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.76.2.20916 Mapping the Mean Annual River Runoff in the Ukrainian Carpathian Region Oleksandr Obodovskyi, Olga Lukianets*, Oksana Konovalenko, Valeriy Mykhaylenko Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 2-A, Glushkov Prospekt, Kyiv, SMP680, Ukraine *Corresponding author: [email protected] The paper presents the spatial distribution of the mean annual river runoff in the Ukrainian Carpathians in the form of a map. The methodological approaches concerning the river runoff mapping and the technological stages of map creation by applying the geographic information system (GIS) analytical functions are considered. The accuracy assessment of the calculation of the mean annual river runoff water based on the data from the hydrometric stations for the whole observation period was performed. The mapping reliability of the mean annual runoff and their territorial variability over the main basins in the Ukrainian Carpathians are analysed. Keywords: rivers of the Ukrainian Carpathians, analytical functions of GIS, spatial distribution, mean annual river runoff, water resources. Introduction Maps of runoff give not only an idea about the space- map of the mean annual river runoff in the Ukrainian time variability of river runoff distribution over the Carpathians (the basins of Tisza, Prut and Dniester riv- studied area but also the quantitative information on ers), its generalisation for designing the stream power a spatial variability, seasonality and regularity of river hydro-energy potential of rivers, even those unstudied.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismicity of the Carpathian Region
    International Journal of Physical Sciences Vol. 1 (2), pp. 085-092 October, 2006 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/IJPS © 2006 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Seismicity of the Carpathian region Dmytro Malytskyy Carpathian Branch of Subbotin Institute of Geophysics, Department of Seismotectonic Researches, 3-b,Naukova st. 79060 Lviv, Ukraine. E-mail: [email protected]. Accepted 19 October, 2006 Carpathian complex prognostic poligon has being created for testing of new methods and equipment and their implementation into the practice of seismotectonic investigations in the Transcarpathians. The polygon consists of a network of regime geophysical stations (RGS). I analyzed seismicity of the Ukrainian sector of the Carpathians. It is determined by local earthquakes and strong subcrustal earthquakes of the Vrancea zone in Romania. In this paper, I estimate the most fundamental parameters describing earthquakes: seismic energy E and energy class K=log(E) in a time window of 40 years (1961-2001). Our results show that, the E 1/ 2 plot against time may be a good tool for understanding of a local earthquake activity, although the shape of the plot is strongly influenced by extreme events. Also, we have found a correlation between seismic moment M0 and energy class K of the local earthquakes for Transcarpathian region. Key words: seismicity, energy class, seismic energy, seismic moment, geodynamic polygon, catalogue INTRODUCTION The Carpathian Arc which stretches for about one and year, seismic stations register dozens of local half thousand kilometres is a fragment of the northern earthquakes with magnitude exceeding 2.5. However, the branch of the Alpine Mediterranean Belt in Eurasia strong earthquakes occur rarely.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantitative Records of Larvae of Ephemeroptera, Odonata and Plecoptera from the Zakarpats’Ka Region, Ukraine (2004, 2006)
    Godunko_ukran_mennyisegi.qxd 2009.01.12. 14:02 Page 135 FOLIA HISTORICO NATURALIA MUSEI MATRAENSIS 2008 32: 135–147 Quantitative records of larvae of Ephemeroptera, Odonata and Plecoptera from the Zakarpats’ka Region, Ukraine (2004, 2006) TIBOR KOVÁCS, ROMAN J. GODUNKO, PÉTER JUHÁSZ, BÉLA KISS & ZOLTÁN MÜLLER ABSTRACT: The first part of this paper (Tables 1-2) provides data on 38 Ephemeroptera, 3 Odonata and 19 Plecoptera taxa from the Zakarpats’ka Region, Ukraine. The species Taeniopteryx auberti Kis & Sowa, 1964 and T. schoenemundi (Mertens, 1923) are recorded in the first time from Ukraine. The following species are new to Zakarpats’ka Region and Tysa River: Cloeon dipterum (Linnaeus, 1761), Kageronia fuscogrisea (Retzius, 1783) (Borzhava), Isogenus nubecula Newman, 1833 (Rika, Teresva, Tysa). The second part (Tables 3-5) is a still unpublished data list of GODUNKO & KOVÁCS (2008). Introduction This paper is divided into two parts. The first part (Tables 1-2) contains results of a quanti- tative sampling focused on the Tysa and its inflows (06.05.2004-07.05.2004, 29.06.2004- 30.06.2004, 19.10.2004-20.10.2004). The water courses investigated are Chorna Tysa, Bila Tysa, Tysa (six sampling spots), Shopurka, Apshytsia, Teresva, Tereblia, Rika, Borzhava. Faunistic results of this work were published by KOVÁCS & GODUNKO (2008). Composit type samples were taken using the “kick and sweep” method. Three semiquan- titative samples were taken from five meter long sections at each sampling spot. This meant the sampling of a 3.75 m2 (3 × 1.25 m2) area at each site. The three separately processed sam- ples represented characteristic habitat-types of the given river-section.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Infrastructure and Political Factors As Determinants of Tourism Development in the Cross-Border Region of Bihor and Maramure¸S.A Comparative Analysis
    sustainability Article Transport Infrastructure and Political Factors as Determinants of Tourism Development in the Cross-Border Region of Bihor and Maramure¸s.A Comparative Analysis Jan A. Wendt 1,* , Vasile Grama 2, Gabriela Ilie¸s 3, Andrey S. Mikhaylov 4,5 , Sorin G. Borza 6 , Grigore Vasile Herman 2 and Agnieszka Bógdał-Brzezi ´nska 7 1 Institute of Geography, Faculty of Oceanography and Geography, Gdansk University, 4 Bazy´nskiegoStr.,˙ 80-309 Gda´nsk,Poland 2 Faculty of Geography, Tourism and Sport, University of Oradea, 1 Universitatii Str., 410087 Oradea, Romania; [email protected] (V.G.); [email protected] (G.V.H.) 3 Faculty of Geography, Extension of Sighetu Marmatiei, Babes-Bolyai University, 6 Avram Iancu Str., 435500 Sighetu Marmatiei, Romania; [email protected] 4 Institute of Regional and Geopolitical Studies, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, 14 Aleksandra Nevskogo Str., 236016 Kaliningrad, Russia; [email protected] 5 Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Staromonetnyy Str., 29, 119017 Moscow, Russia 6 Faculty of History, International Relations, Political Science and Communication Sciences, 1 Universitatii Str., 410087 Oradea, Romania; [email protected] 7 Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw, 26/28 Krakowskie Przedmie´scie Str., 00-927 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-58-523-65-17 Citation: Wendt, J.A.; Grama, V.; Ilie¸s,G.; Mikhaylov, A.S.; Borza, S.G.; Herman, G.V.; Bógdał-Brzezi´nska,A. Abstract: This article follows two important interconnected aspects. On one hand, it investigates Transport Infrastructure and Political whether the political factors represented by the presence of ethnic minorities can be a catalyst Factors as Determinants of Tourism for tourism development in cross-border regions, in addition to the development of transport Development in the Cross-Border infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Arrangements of the Flood Management In
    World Meteorological Organization THE ASSOCIATED PROGRAMME ON FLOOD MANAGEMENT INTEGRATED FLOOD MANAGEMENT CASE STUDY UKRAINE: FLOOD MANAGEMENT Within the Tisza River Basin Edited by TECHNICAL SUPPORT UNIT _______________________________________ NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. It should be noted that this document is not an official WMO Publication and has not been subjected to the Organization's standard editorial procedures. The views expressed by individuals or groups of experts and published in this document do not necessarily have the endorsement of the Organization. WMO/GWP Associated Programme on Flood Management UKRAINE: FLOOD MANAGEMENT Within the Tisza River Basin 1. Location 1.1 Physiographic and Climate Characteristics The Tisza River is the greatest left tributary of the Danube River. Its length is 967 km and the catchment area is 157 000 km2. The upper reaches of the Tisza River begin in Ukraine, in the Carpathian Mountains at the confluence of the Czorna Tisza and Biela Tisza rivers. The Tisza river basin within the territory of Ukraine is 12 760 km2. The length from the spring (the spring of the Czorna Tisza which is considered as the source of the Tisza because it has a large catchment than the Biela Tisza) to the border with Hungary is 220.4 km. In three parts, the Tisza River forms a state border – twice with Hungary and once with Romania.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukrainian Section I
    Ukrainian section I. Date: September 28, 1998 Country: Ukraine Name of wetland: Upper Tisa between headwaters and Tyachiv Geographical Coordinates: 23°30’ W - 24°30’ E - 47°04’ S - 48°20’ N Altitude: 204-1650 m above Baltic sea level (a.s.l.) Area: 90 000 ha Overview: The headwaters of River Tisa, formed by the confluence of the rivers Chorna and Bila Tisa in the Transcarpathian Region (Ukrainian territory), with their picturesque landscapes, extremely wide biological diversity and original cultural features, are great natural and historical values of international importance and should be reckoned as part of the European natural heritage. Wetland type: M, N, Ts, U, Va, W Ramsar Criteria: 1a, c; 2a, b, d; 3b; 4a Map of site included? see Map Names and addresses of the compilers of this form: Kricsfalusy V.V., Ruthenia Ecoclub, Uzhgorod, Ukraine with M.Yu. Danilyuk, Yu.I. Krochko, V.I. Krokhtyak, A.Ye. Lugovoj , G.M. Mezõ-Kricsfalusy, A.V. Mihály, A.O. Polyanovsky, L.L. Potish, A.B. Vajnagi General location: Ukraine, Transcarpathian Region, Tyachiv and Rahiv districts. Physical features: The morphostructures of the region are extremely varied. In the section between Tyachiv and Dilove River Tisa and its tributaries, rivers Tereblya and Teresva, belong to the Verhovyna morphostructures. The low-mountain and middle-mountain erosional tectonic relief with peaks of 600-700 m a.s.l., which was formed on Oligocene sediments, prevails here. The Polonyna morphostructure, the highest part of the Ukrainian Carpathians, has a high and middle-mountain relief. The morphostructure covers the Svydovets, Chornohora and Maramarosh morphostructures of lower orders.
    [Show full text]