Parliamentary Boundary Review
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Agenda Item No. REPORT TO: General Purposes Committee DATE: 15 July 2021 SERVICE AREA: Legal and Governance REPORTING OFFICER: Head of Legal and Governance (Elizabeth Jackson – Democratic Services Manager) SUBJECT: PARLIAMENTARY BOUNDARY REVIEW WARD/S AFFECTED: ALL DISTRICT FORWARD PLAN REF: N/A 1.0 PURPOSE OF REPORT To inform Members of the Boundary Commission for England’s initial proposals for new parliamentary constituency boundaries. 2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS That the Commission’s initial proposals as set out at paragraph 4.18 of the report be noted. That Members can respond individually to the proposals on the Boundary Commission for England’s website. 3.0 RECOMMENDED REASON FOR DECISION/S To ensure Members are aware of the Boundary Commission for England’s proposals. 4.0 THE REPORT 4.1 The Boundary Commission for England (the BCE) is an independent and impartial non-departmental public body, which is responsible for periodically reviewing Parliamentary constituency boundaries in England. It is currently conducting a review on the basis of rules updated by the Parliamentary Constituencies Act 2020. The review is known as the 2023 review as the date by which the Commission must make its final recommendations is 1 July 2023. 1 4.2 The Act requires there to be 650 constituencies for the UK Parliament as a whole. The number of constituencies allocated to England for the 2023 review is 541 and these are distributed between the nine ‘English regions’ defined in the Act using the mathematical formula as for the initial allocation between the four parts of the UK. The number of constituencies allocated to Yorkshire and the Humber is unchanged at 54. Initial proposals aim to ensure that each constituency is wholly contained within a single region. 4.3 Every recommended constituency must have an electorate at 2 March 2020 that is no less than 95% and no more than 105% of the ‘UK electoral quota’. The UK electoral quota for the 2023 Review is, to the nearest whole number, 73,393. Accordingly, every recommended constituency must have an electorate as at 2 March 2020 that is no smaller than 69,724 and no larger than 77,062. 4.4 Other factors which the BCE may take into account in establishing a new map of constituencies for the 2023 Review are: geographical considerations, local government boundaries as they existed (or were in prospect) on 1 December 2020, boundaries of existing constituencies; and any local ties that would be broken by changes in constituencies. 4.5 In formulating its initial proposals for particular areas, the BCE exercises its own judgement and does not consult the Parliamentary political parties, local authorities or any other interested groups or people. The BCE considers that it should take the initiative in preparing its proposals from all the information available to it. The proposals are therefore formed by the BCE from a position of independence and impartiality and are not influenced by any particular viewpoint or opinion. Once the proposals are published, the statutory procedures allow for a public consultation during which political parties and others can then make their views on proposed boundaries known to the BCE. 4.6 Currently the Harrogate District is covered by three parliamentary constituencies, being: Harrogate and Knaresborough (wholly contained within the Harrogate District with an electorate of 78,372 in March 2020) Selby and Ainsty (part within the Harrogate District with an electorate of 78,678 in March 2020) Skipton and Ripon (part within the Harrogate District with an electorate of 79,295 in March 2020) 4.7 Under the BCE’s initial proposals there will continue to be three constituencies covering the District, albeit the wards comprising each will have changed as detailed below. Timetable for the review 4.8 Stage one – the review began in January 2021, using electorate data from March 2020 (the date specified by the legislation) for each local government ward in England. The Commission used this data to draw up initial proposals which were published on 8 June. 2 4.9 Stage two - the Commission are consulting on its initial proposals for eight weeks from 8 June to 2 August 2021. The BCE’s website at www.bcereviews.org.uk has more information about how to respond. 4.10 Stage three - all of the responses to the first consultation will be published and there will be a six-week period of 'secondary consultation' in early 2022, during which people can provide their views on what others have said in the first consultation. There will be no new proposals at that stage. During this six week period, a limited number of public hearings will be held in each English region. 4.11 Stage four - the Commission will analyse all the responses from the previous two consultations and appropriate changes will be made to the initial proposals. 4.12 Stage five - these revised proposals will be published for a third and final four-week period of public consultation. Following analysis of responses to the third consultation appropriate changes will be made to the revised proposals and the Commission will submit its final report and recommendations to the government by 1 July 2023. 4.13 Within four months of the last of the four Commissions (reviews are taking place in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland) submitting their report, the UK Government must prepare the Order that would bring all their recommendations into law. Following recent changes, this Order no longer needs the approval of Parliament: it is sent directly to the Privy Council. If the Privy Council approves, the new constituencies will be used at the next General election following that (not at any interim by-elections). Initial Proposals for Yorkshire and the Humber 4.14 The number of constituencies in the Yorkshire and the Humber region will remain at 54. The proposals leave two of the 54 existing constituencies wholly unchanged, and another 13 unchanged except to realign constituency boundaries with new local government ward boundaries. 4.15 As it was not always possible to allocate whole numbers of constituencies to individual counties, some county council and unitary authority areas had been grouped into sub-regions. The number of constituencies allocated to each sub-region was determined by the combined electorate of the local authorities they contained. Consequently, it was necessary to propose some constituencies that crossed county council or unitary authority boundaries, although they had sought to keep such crossings to a minimum. 4.16 In North Yorkshire and West Yorkshire, two constituencies have been proposed that cross county boundaries. One combines a single ward from the City of Leeds with District of Selby wards, including the town of Selby. The second contains electors from the City of Leeds, Borough of Harrogate, and districts of Selby and Hambleton. The arrangement in the City of York is changed only to align with new ward boundaries. 4.17 Further detail explaining the Commission’s reasoning for the proposed new boundaries in North Yorkshire is given at paragraphs 50 to 57 of the 3 Boundary Commission for England’s document “Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the Yorkshire and the Humber region” published on the consultation portal at https://boundarycommissionforengland.independent.gov.uk/wp- content/uploads/2021/06/2021-06-08-Initial-Proposals-Yorkshire-and-the- Humber-Region.pdf Proposals for Harrogate District 4.18 The District council area is proposed to be covered by 3 wards. The changes as they affect the existing warding pattern are detailed below. 1. Harrogate and Knaresborough – proposed electorate 72,850: The proposed new ward is the ‘urban wards of Harrogate and Knaresborough’ plus Killinghall and Hampsthwaite ward. The west, south and east boundaries remain the same, but Claro ward to the north up to and including Boroughbridge ward and the part of Ouseburn ward containing the villages of Marton cum Grafton and the Dunsforths are no longer included. Also, the part of Fountains and Ripley ward containing Ripley is no longer included. The existing and proposed warding pattern for Harrogate and Knaresborough are shown at Appendices 1 and 2, and Appendix 5 lists the wards which will be included. 2. Skipton and Ripon – proposed electorate 76,758: The only changes to this large constituency are in the Harrogate district. Bishop Monkton and Newby ward is no longer included. There has been some tidying of boundaries – the whole of Fountains and Ripley ward and Washburn ward are now included (previous these wards were split between constituencies). 3. Wetherby and Easingwold – proposed electorate 74,405: This new ward replaces those parts of the district previously covered by ‘Selby and Ainsty’ and now includes Bishop Monkton and Newby ward, Claro ward and Boroughbridge ward and the whole of Ouseburn ward (which was previously split between constituencies). The part of Washburn ward comprising Huby and Weeton is no longer included. The existing and proposed warding pattern for the district as a whole are shown at Appendices 3 and 4. 4.19 Attached at Appendix 5 are details of the proposed parliamentary constituencies in whole or in part for the Harrogate District. The tables show which district wards are proposed to be included in each constituency and electorate numbers. 5.0 REQUIRED ASSESSMENTS AND IMPLICATIONS 5.1 The following were considered: Financial Implications; Human Resources Implications; Legal Implications; ICT Implications; Strategic Property/Asset Management Considerations; Risk Assessment; Equality and Diversity (the Public Sector Equality Duty and impact upon people with protected characteristics). If applicable, the outcomes of any consultations, 4 assessments, considerations and implications considered necessary during preparation of this report are detailed below. 6.0 CONCLUSIONS 6.1 The proposals are presented to Members to note.