DOCSLIB.ORG

Microsoft Word

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Microsoft Word wfU‡Mb÷vB‡bi fvlv`k©‡bi ¯^iƒc 147 148 gynv¤§` Avmv`y¾vgvb The Dhaka University Journal of Linguistics: Vol. 2 No.4 August 2009 Avlvp 1393, wÎsk el©; 122)| Rxeb I Kg© Dfq w`K †_‡KB `k©‡bi BwZnv‡m Page: 147-159, Published on August 2010 by the Registrar, Dhaka hvuiv Abb¨, Aw÷ªqvi jy¨WwfM wfU‡Mb÷vBb Zvu‡`i Ab¨Zg| mgvR, cwi‡ek ev University ISSN-2075-3098 fv‡M¨i cÖwZK’jZvi g‡a¨I `k©‡bi cÖwZ AvgiY Abyiv‡Mi w`K †_‡K Zvui Zzjbv n‡Z cv‡i m‡µwUm Avi w¯ú‡bvRvi m‡½ ( Ave`yj gwZb; 2003, 11) fvlv`k©b Av‡jvPbvq wfU‡Mb÷vB‡bi f~wgKv ZvB Awemsevw`Z| Warnock G cÖm‡½ wfU‡Mb÷vB‡bi fvlv`k©‡bi ¯^iƒc wj‡L‡Qb : There can be no serious doubt that the most powerful and pervasive influence upon the practice of philosophy in this country today has been that of Ludwig Wittgenstein.(CWK Mundle, gynv¤§` Avmv`y¾vgvb1 1979:158) wfU‡Mb÷vBb fvlvi m¤¢vebv I mxgve×Zv m¤ú‡K© e¯‘wbô w`K wb‡`©kbv `vb 1. mnKvix Aa¨vcK, fvlvweÁvb wefvM, XvKv wek¦we`¨vjq| K‡ib| eûgyLx cÖwZfvai G e¨w³‡Z¡i Av‡jvPbvq fvlvi mv‡_ `k©‡bi m¤úK© I Email : [email protected] mgm¨vejx dz‡U D‡V‡Q| fvlvwe‡k−l‡Y weÁv‡bi bvbvw`K I Zuvi Av‡jvPbvq A½xf~Z| A‡b‡Ki Kv‡Q wfU‡Mb÷vBb ZvB ÔweÁvb-`k©‡bi Ab¨Zg cÖe³vÕ Abstract (G.†K.Gg mvjvn DwÏb, 1999:78)| Ludwig Wittgenstein is one of the influential philosophers of iv‡mj I †d«‡Mi A_©-we‡k−l‡Yi gZv`k©MZ w`K cwinvi K‡i wZwb aviYv I A- the nineteenth century. His philosophical reputation is based aviYvi g‡a¨ mxgvbv wb‡`©k K‡ib ( gynv¤§` Avmv`y¾vgvb, 2006: 208)| on his studies of the analytical philosophy especially the philosophical study of logic, language, mathematics and wfU‡Mb÷vB‡bi cÖKvwkZ MÖ‡š’i g‡a¨ D‡j−L‡hvM¨ n‡”Q Tractatus Logico- metaphysics. He made great contribution in the arena of Philosophicus, Notebooks 1914-16 Ges Philosophical Investigations. analytical philosophy mainly on the philosophy of language. He stated his own concept and ideas in his revolutionary book Gi g‡a¨ UªvK‡UUvm `k©‡bi RM‡Z AZ¨š— cÖfvekvjx| UªvK‡UUvm `k©b welqK the `Tractatus Logico Philosophicus.’ He discussed picture MÖš’; GLv‡b fvlv Abyl½ Av‡jvwPZ n‡q‡Q myPvi“iƒ‡c| G Av‡jvPbvi mvie¯‘ theory, the notion of name, logical atomism etc in this book. n‡”Q, mvaviYZ `k©‡b †h me ‡gŠwjK †hŠw³K mgm¨v PP©v Kiv n‡q _v‡K Zvi This article deals with his important works and the limitation mgvavb cvIqv †M‡j Ab¨vb¨ me mgm¨v Avcbv-Avcwb mgvavb n‡q hvq A_ev of these. mgm¨v¸wj cwiMwYZ nq QÙ mgm¨v wn‡m‡e| Kv‡RB wfU‡Mb÷vBb H me †gŠwjK Key words: Picture theory of language, Names, Private, Public, Proposition, Metaphysics. †hŠw³K mgm¨v mgvav‡bi †Póv K‡ib Zuvi UªvK‡UUv‡m Ges wZwb Dcjwã K‡ib †h, Gme †gŠwjK †hŠw³K mgm¨vi P~ovš— mgvavb wZwb †c‡q †M‡Qb| (AvdRvjyj evmvi (m¤úv) 2003; 92)| 1. f~wgKv 1953 mv‡j Ôwd‡jvmwdKvm Bb‡fw÷‡MkÝÕ bv‡g †h MÖš’ cÖKvwkZ nq ‡mLv‡b we‡k−lYx fvlv`k©‡bi cw_K…r I kZvãxi Ab¨Zg †kªô `vk©wbK wfU‡Mb÷vBb wZwb fvlvq e¨eüZ k‡ãi A_© Ges fvlvi †gŠwjK wfwË Kx Kx KvVv‡gvi Dci (jy¨WwfM †Rv‡md †Rvnvb wfU‡Mb÷vBb, 1989-1951) mvaviY fvlvwe‡k−l‡Yi cÖwZwôZ Zv wba©viY K‡ib| Z‡e fvlv`k©b welqK Zvui cÖwZwbwaZ¡Kvix MÖ‡š’i bvg †¶‡Î hyMvš—Kvix cwieZ©b mvab K‡ib (Avwbmy¾vgvb, 2003; 27)| cÖPwjZ UªvK‡UUvm jwR‡Kv-wd‡jvmwdKvm| Avgvi eZ©gvb cÖe‡Üi g~j Av‡jvP¨ welq nj fvlvi wewfbœ w`K, eûwea e¨envi, Ges M~p Zvrch©‡K wZwb Zuvi e¨wZµgx ÔwfU‡Mb÷vB‡bi fvlv`k©‡bi ¯^iƒc we‡k−lY; e¶¨gvY cÖe‡Ü cÖZ¨¶ev` I be¨ we‡k−lYx c×wZi mvnv‡h¨ g~Z© K‡i †Zv‡jb (Avey ‡nbv †gv¯—dv Kvgvj (m¤úvw`Z), cÖZ¨¶ev‡`i Av‡jv‡K wZwb fvlv`k©‡b †h Ae`vb †i‡L‡Qb †m m¤^‡Ü e¨vL¨v Kiv n‡q‡Q| D‡j−L¨ †h, G Av‡jvPbvq g~jZ wfU‡Mb÷vBb iwPZ UªvK‡UUvm jwR‡Kv- The Dhaka University Journal of Linguistics Vol. 2 No. 4, August 2009 wfU‡Mb÷vB‡bi fvlv`k©‡bi ¯^iƒc 149 150 gynv¤§` Avmv`y¾vgvb wd‡jvmwdKvmÕ MÖ‡š’i we‡k−lY I Gi mxgve×Zv Dc¯’vwcZ n‡q‡Q| Z‡e PovB DrivB‡qi ga¨ w`‡q G MÖš’wU wfU‡Mb÷vBb iPbv K‡ib| Z_¨ DcvË I wfU‡Mb÷vB‡bi Philosophical Investigations MÖ‡š’i †gŠwjK w`K I GLv‡b BwZnvm †_‡K Rvbv hvq, cÖ‡KŠkj we`¨vi QvÎ wfU‡Mb÷vB‡bi `k©‡bi iv‡R¨ e¨vL¨v Kiv n‡q‡Q| cÖe‡Ü ‡gvUvgywU wm×v‡š— DcbxZ nIqv †M‡Q †h, cÖ‡ek Dcb¨v‡mi NUbvi gZ we¯§qKi| `vk©wbK hyw³we`¨vi RbK MUje †d«‡Mi wfU‡Mb÷vBb wb‡R †d«‡Mi gZ GKRb K…wÎg fvlvi Avwe®‹viK bb, Z‡e wZwb m‡½ wZwb Zvui fwel¨r cwiKíbv wb‡q Avjvc K‡ib Ges Zuvi civg‡k© †Kgweª‡R Aek¨B †hŠw³K, MvwYwZK cÖv‡qvwMK I A_©c~Y© fvlvi mªóv| Av‡mb iv‡m‡ji Kv‡Q covïbv Ki‡Z| iv‡m‡ji GK weeiY †_‡K Rvbv hvq, GKw`b wfU‡Mb÷vBb Zuvi wbKU G‡m e‡jb : ÔAvcbvi wK g‡b nq Avwg GKUv 2. Rb¥ I cov‡jLv Av¯— BwWqU ? Avwg ejjvg, ‡Kb Rvb‡Z Pvb ? wZwb DËi w`‡jb, ÒKviY Avwg jy¨WwfM wfU‡Mb÷vBb 1889 m‡bi 26 GwcÖj Aw÷ªqvi wf‡qbvq Rb¥ MÖnY BwWqU n‡j Avgvi cÖ‡KŠkjx nIqvB DwPZ Avi Zv bv n‡j Avwg `vk©wbK n‡Z K‡ib| wZwb wQ‡jb wf‡qbvi Ab¨Zg abx wkícwZ cwiev‡ii mš—vb | PvB| ÒAvwg Zv‡K ejjvg, wcÖq eÜz, Avcwb GKUv Av¯— BwWqU wKbv Zv Avwg Rvwb bv| Z‡e AvMvgx QzwUi g‡a¨ Avcbvi fvj jv‡M `k©‡bi Ggb †h †Kvb 1908 wLª÷vã ch©š— wZwb Rvg©vwb‡Z cÖ‡KŠkj wel‡q covïbv K‡ib| Gici wZwb wel‡qi Dci GKwU cÖeÜ hw` wj‡L wb‡q Av‡mb Zvn‡j †mwU covi ci Avwg GKB wel‡q covïbvi Rb¨ Bsj¨v‡Ûi g¨vb‡P÷vi wek¦we`¨vj‡q fwZ© nb (Avwgbyj Avcbv‡K ej‡Z cvie| wZwb ZvB K‡iwQ‡jb Ges cieZ©x Uv‡g©i ïi“‡ZB GKwU Bmjvg, 2001; 292)| cÖeÜ wZwb Avgv‡K co‡Z w`‡jb| cÖe‡Üi cÖ_g evK¨wU covi m‡½ m‡½ Avgvi G mgqB Zvui gb cÖ‡KŠkj we`¨v †_‡K weï× MwYZ Ges MwYZ †_‡K MwY‡Zi cÖZ¨q nq †h wZwb GKRb cÖwZfvai e¨w³ Ges Zv‡K †evSvjvg †h †Kvb µ‡gB `vk©wbK wfwËi w`‡K A_©vr we`¨vi cÖv‡qvwMK KvÊ I kvLv-cÖkvLv †_‡K Zvi g~‡ji Zvui cÖ‡KŠkjx nIqv DwPr bq (nvi“b, 2003: 23)| Gfv‡eB cÖ‡KŠkjwe`¨vi QvÎ w`‡K m‡i Avm‡Z _v‡K| iv‡m‡ji Principles of Mathematics c‡o wZwb wfU‡Mb÷vBb `k©‡bi iv‡R¨ cÖ‡ek Ki‡jb| 1914 m‡bi wKQz mgq ch©š— wZwb `vi“Yfv‡e DrmvwnZ nb Ges Zvui civg‡k© †KgweªR wek¦we`¨vj‡q fwZ© nb Ges †Kgweª‡R covïbv K‡ib Ges Zvici GKB eQ‡i cÖ_g wek¦hy× Avi¤¢ n‡j wZwb `k©‡bi RM‡Z cÖ‡ek K‡ib| 1914 m‡bi wKQz mgq ch©š— wZwb †Kgweª‡R covïbv †hvM ‡`b Aw÷ªqvi †mbvevwnbx‡Z| wKš‘ ˆmwbK Rxe‡bi e¨¯—Zv I m¼UgqZvi K‡ib Ges cÖ_g wek¦hy× ïi“ n‡j Aw÷ªqvi †mbvevwnbx‡Z †hvM †`b| cÖ_g †fZ‡iI wZwb Zuvi `vk©wbK wPš—v-a¨vb Ae¨vnZ iv‡Lb Ges †bvUey‡K †m¸‡jv wek¦hy× †kl nIqvi ciI wfU‡Mb÷vBb †Kgweª‡R †M‡jb bv; 1920-1926 mb wj‡L ivL‡Zb| GiB dj Zvui ÔUªvK‡UUvm jwR‡Kv-wd‡jvmwdKvmÕ ms‡¶‡c ch©š— wZwb `w¶Y Aw÷ªqvi MÖvgv‡j ¯‹zj-wk¶K wn‡m‡e KvR K‡ib| 1929 m‡b UªvK‡UUvm (Tractatus) MÖš’wU | Rvg©vb fvlvq †jLv MÖš’wUi g~j bvg Logisch wZwb †KgweªR wek¦we`¨vj‡q wd‡i Av‡mb Ges 1947 ch©š— `k©‡bi Aa¨vcK Philosophische Abhandlung| MÖš’wUi iPbvKvj 1918, Avi cÖKvkKvj wn‡m‡e ‡mLv‡b Kg©iZ _v‡Kb| wfU‡Mb÷vBb `k©b QvovI fvlvZË¡, mvwnZ¨ZË¡ 1921| 1922 mv‡j MÖš’wUi Bs‡iwR Abyev` cÖKvwkZ nq ‘Tractatus Logico BZ¨vw` bvbv ÁvbkvLvq ¸i“Z¡c~Y© Ae`vb †i‡L‡Qb| wPiKzgvi jy¨WwfM Philosophicus’ bv‡g jÛb †_‡K| G bvgwU cÖ¯—ve K‡ib wR, B gy¨i Ges iv‡mj wfU‡Mb÷vBb 1951 m‡bi 29 GwcÖj †Kgweª‡R Zvui wPwKrm‡Ki evwo‡Z K¨vÝv‡i MÖš’wUi GKwU m~`xN© f~wgKv wj‡L †`b| MÖš’wU cÖKvwkZ nIqvi ci wfU‡Mb÷vBb Avµvš— n‡q g„Zz¨eiY K‡ib| GK Rb Av‡jvP¨ e¨w³‡Z cwiYZ nb| UªvK‡UUvm Mª‡š’ wfU‡Mb÷vBb fvlvi wewfbœ w`K wb‡q Abycy•¶ Av‡jvPbv K‡ib| 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Companion to Analytic Philosophy
    A Companion to Analytic Philosophy Blackwell Companions to Philosophy This outstanding student reference series offers a comprehensive and authoritative survey of philosophy as a whole. Written by today’s leading philosophers, each volume provides lucid and engaging coverage of the key figures, terms, topics, and problems of the field. Taken together, the volumes provide the ideal basis for course use, represent- ing an unparalleled work of reference for students and specialists alike. Already published in the series 15. A Companion to Bioethics Edited by Helga Kuhse and Peter Singer 1. The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy Edited by Nicholas Bunnin and Eric 16. A Companion to the Philosophers Tsui-James Edited by Robert L. Arrington 2. A Companion to Ethics Edited by Peter Singer 17. A Companion to Business Ethics Edited by Robert E. Frederick 3. A Companion to Aesthetics Edited by David Cooper 18. A Companion to the Philosophy of 4. A Companion to Epistemology Science Edited by Jonathan Dancy and Ernest Sosa Edited by W. H. Newton-Smith 5. A Companion to Contemporary Political 19. A Companion to Environmental Philosophy Philosophy Edited by Robert E. Goodin and Philip Pettit Edited by Dale Jamieson 6. A Companion to Philosophy of Mind 20. A Companion to Analytic Philosophy Edited by Samuel Guttenplan Edited by A. P. Martinich and David Sosa 7. A Companion to Metaphysics Edited by Jaegwon Kim and Ernest Sosa Forthcoming 8. A Companion to Philosophy of Law and A Companion to Genethics Legal Theory Edited by John Harris and Justine Burley Edited by Dennis Patterson 9. A Companion to Philosophy of Religion A Companion to African-American Edited by Philip L.
    [Show full text]
  • " CONTENTS of VOLUME XXXVIII—1964 >•
    " CONTENTS OF VOLUME XXXVIII—1964 >• it ARTICLES: pAGE Anderson, James F., Was St. Thomas a Philosopher? 435 Boh, Ivan, An Examination of Some Proofs in Burleigh's Propo- sitional Logic 44 Brady, Jules M., St. Augustine's Theory of Seminal Reasons.. 141 Burns, J. Patout, Action in Suarez 453 Burrell, David B., Kant and Philosophical Knowledge 189 Chroust, Anton-Hermann, Some Reflections on the Origin of the Term " Philosopher " 423 Collins, James, The Work of Rudolf Allers 28 Fairbanks, Matthew J., C. S. Peirce and Logical Atomism 178 Grisez, Germain G., Sketch of a Future Metaphysics 310 O'Brien, Andrew J., Duns Scotus' Teaching on the Distinction between Essence and Existence 61 McWilliams, James A., The Concept as Villain 445 Pax, Clyde V., Philosophical Reflection: Gabriel Marcel 159 Smith, John E., The Relation of Thought and Being: Some Lessons from Hegel's Encyclopedia 22 Stokes, Walter E., Whitehead's Challenge to Theistic Realism. ... 1 Tallon, Andrew, Personal Immortality in Averroes' Tahafut Al- Tahafut 341 REVIEW ARTICLE : O'Neil, Charles J., Another Notable Study of Aristotle's Meta­ physics 509 ill iv Contents of Volume XXXVIII DEPARTMENTS : PAGE Book Brevities 551 Books Received 133, 274, 415, 557 Chronicles: The Husserl Archives and the Edition of Husserl's Works 473 International Congresses of Philosophy in Mexico City.. 278 Progress Report: Philosophy in the NCE 214 The Secretary's Chronicle 80, 218, 358, 483 BOOK REVIEWS: Anderson, James P., Natural Theology: The Metaphysics of God 265 Austin, J. L., Philosophical Papers 125 Capek, Milec, The Philosophical Impact of Contemporary Physics 248 Caturelli, Alberto, La fdosofiu en Argentina actual 403 Crocker, Lester G., Nature and Cidture: Ethical Thought in the French Englightement 539 Dufrenne, Mikel, Language and Philosophy, transl.
    [Show full text]
  • Dialogical Grammar: Varieties of Dialogue in Wittgenstein's
    ISSN: 2325-3290 (online) Dialogical Grammar: Varieties of Dialogue in Wittgenstein’s Methodology Dorit Lemberger Bar-Ilan university Abstract The dialogical character of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations has received scant attention in the literature, given the work’s status in his total oeuvre, and is dismissed as a marginal as compared to the other differences between the Tractatus and the Investigations. The main lines of interpretation that have been proposed see dialogue as a rhetorical technique intended to present erroneous positions and then refute them, as an exemplification of what can be expressed in language (McGinn 1997; Rhees 1998), or as a reflection of Wittgenstein’s informal teaching method (Malcolm 2001; Savickey et al. 1990). The present article adopts the perspective that Wittgenstein’s use of dialogue makes it possible to track the various modes of language-acts, consonant with his directions to examine the daily use of language (Wittgenstein 2009, §116 and esp. §132), “when language is, as it were, idling.” In his later inquiries, Wittgenstein frequently considers the nature of mental states, accompanied by an attempt to characterize the differences between them while at the same time dealing with the cases in which it is difficult to distinguish them. In this process he made a variety of uses of dialogue, each of which embodies a different aspect of language action. Subsequently I will demonstrate that these different uses are not haphazard. A scrutiny of the nature of the dialogue can help us understand the nature of the activity carried out of the state of consciousness. Finally, I propose a distinction among three main types of dialogue: technical, conversational, and reflexive.
    [Show full text]
  • Wittgenstein on Freedom of the Will: Not Determinism, Yet Not Indeterminism
    Wittgenstein on Freedom of the Will: Not Determinism, Yet Not Indeterminism Thomas Nadelhoffer This is a prepublication draft. This version is being revised for resubmission to a journal. Abstract Since the publication of Wittgenstein’s Lectures on Freedom of the Will, his remarks about free will and determinism have received very little attention. Insofar as these lectures give us an opportunity to see him at work on a traditional—and seemingly intractable—philosophical problem and given the voluminous secondary literature written about nearly every other facet of Wittgenstein’s life and philosophy, this neglect is both surprising and unfortunate. Perhaps these lectures have not attracted much attention because they are available to us only in the form of a single student’s notes (Yorick Smythies). Or perhaps it is because, as one Wittgenstein scholar put it, the lectures represent only “cursory reflections” that “are themselves uncompelling." (Glock 1996: 390) Either way, my goal is to show that Wittgenstein’s views about freedom of the will merit closer attention. All of these arguments might look as if I wanted to argue for the freedom of the will or against it. But I don't want to. --Ludwig Wittgenstein, Lectures on Freedom of the Will Since the publication of Wittgenstein’s Lectures on Freedom of the Will,1 his remarks from these lectures about free will and determinism have received very little attention.2 Insofar as these lectures give us an opportunity to see him at work on a traditional—and seemingly intractable— philosophical problem and given the voluminous secondary literature written about nearly every 1 Wittgenstein’s “Lectures on Freedom of the Will” will be abbreviated as LFW 1993 in this paper (see bibliography) since I am using the version reprinted in Philosophical Occasions (1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Ludwig.Wittgenstein.-.Philosophical.Investigations.Pdf
    PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS By LUDWIG WITTGENSTEIN Translated by G. E. M. ANSCOMBE BASIL BLACKWELL TRANSLATOR'S NOTE Copyright © Basil Blackwell Ltd 1958 MY acknowledgments are due to the following, who either checked First published 1953 Second edition 1958 the translation or allowed me to consult them about German and Reprint of English text alone 1963 Austrian usage or read the translation through and helped me to Third edition of English and German text with index 1967 improve the English: Mr. R. Rhees, Professor G. H. von Wright, Reprint of English text with index 1968, 1972, 1974, 1976, 1978, Mr. P. Geach, Mr. G. Kreisel, Miss L. Labowsky, Mr. D. Paul, Miss I. 1981, 1986 Murdoch. Basil Blackwell Ltd 108 Cowley Road, Oxford, OX4 1JF, UK All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be NOTE TO SECOND EDITION reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or THE text has been revised for the new edition. A large number of otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. small changes have been made in the English text. The following passages have been significantly altered: Except in the United States of America, this book is sold to the In Part I: §§ 108, 109, 116, 189, 193, 251, 284, 352, 360, 393,418, condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re- 426, 442, 456, 493, 520, 556, 582, 591, 644, 690, 692.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalized Molecular Formulas in Logical Atomism
    Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy An Argument for Completely General Facts: Volume 9, Number 7 Generalized Molecular Formulas in Logical Editor in Chief Atomism Audrey Yap, University of Victoria Landon D. C. Elkind Editorial Board Annalisa Coliva, UC Irvine In his 1918 logical atomism lectures, Russell argued that there are Vera Flocke, Indiana University, Bloomington no molecular facts. But he posed a problem for anyone wanting Henry Jackman, York University to avoid molecular facts: we need truth-makers for generaliza- Frederique Janssen-Lauret, University of Manchester tions of molecular formulas, but such truth-makers seem to be Kevin C. Klement, University of Massachusetts both unavoidable and to have an abominably molecular charac- Consuelo Preti, The College of New Jersey ter. Call this the problem of generalized molecular formulas. I clarify Marcus Rossberg, University of Connecticut the problem here by distinguishing two kinds of generalized Anthony Skelton, Western University molecular formula: incompletely generalized molecular formulas Mark Textor, King’s College London and completely generalized molecular formulas. I next argue that, if empty worlds are logically possible, then the model-theoretic Editors for Special Issues and truth-functional considerations that are usually given ad- Sandra Lapointe, McMaster University dress the problem posed by the first kind of formula, but not the Alexander Klein, McMaster University problem posed by the second kind. I then show that Russell’s Review Editors commitments in 1918 provide an answer to the problem of com- Sean Morris, Metropolitan State University of Denver pletely generalized molecular formulas: some truth-makers will Sanford Shieh, Wesleyan University be non-atomic facts that have no constituents.
    [Show full text]
  • Wittgenstein's True Thoughts
    Nordic Wittgenstein Review 2(2013) AndrewLugg Wittgenstein’sTrue Thoughts Abstract The centralremarks of the Tractatus are without substantial content or consequence, remarks at theboundaries of sense that dissolveinto truth.While theysay nothing,theyencapsulatelogicalfeatures of languageand theworld.Unasserted, they expressthoughts, thetruth of which Wittgensteintakestobeunassailableand definitive, while asserted,they are out-and-out nonsense.Whatismanifest in linguistic practice is no more sayable – andnolesssignificant – thanwhatis manifest in logical truths,mathematicalequationsand theprinciplesof mechanics. 1. Understandingthe Tractatus Ludwig Wittgenstein seems to espouse philosophical opinions and defend adistinctive philosophicalpoint of viewinthe Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (TLP 1955/1961) 1 .There is no shaking the impression thatheisfully engaged in thephilosophicalenterprise, and it doeshim adisservice to interpret himasdismissing philosophy root and branch. Besides criticising traditional philosophy and pioneering anew approach to philosophical problems, he promotes what looksfor allthe world like philosophicalideas. This is how the Tractatus was read at the time by Bertrand Russell, Frank Ramsey andthe members of the Vienna 1 References to Wittgenstein’s works will be given using the abbreviations mentioned in the list of references. 33 Andrew Lugg BY-NC-SA Circle,not least Rudolf Carnapand Moritz Schlick,and how it is stillwidely read. It cannot be by chancethat Wittgenstein refers to “the thoughts whichare expressedin[the
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae of Alvin Plantinga
    CURRICULUM VITAE OF ALVIN PLANTINGA A. Education Calvin College A.B. 1954 University of Michigan M.A. 1955 Yale University Ph.D. 1958 B. Academic Honors and Awards Fellowships Fellow, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, 1968-69 Guggenheim Fellow, June 1 - December 31, 1971, April 4 - August 31, 1972 Fellow, American Academy of Arts & Sciences, 1975 - Fellow, Calvin Center for Christian Scholarship, 1979-1980 Visiting Fellow, Balliol College, Oxford 1975-76 National Endowment for the Humanities Fellowships, 1975-76, 1987, 1995-6 Fellowship, American Council of Learned Societies, 1980-81 Fellow, Frisian Academy, 1999 Gifford Lecturer, 1987, 2005 Honorary Degrees Glasgow University, l982 Calvin College (Distinguished Alumni Award), 1986 North Park College, 1994 Free University of Amsterdam, 1995 Brigham Young University, 1996 University of the West in Timisoara (Timisoara, Romania), 1998 Valparaiso University, 1999 2 Offices Vice-President, American Philosophical Association, Central Division, 1980-81 President, American Philosophical Association, Central Division, 1981-82 President, Society of Christian Philosophers, l983-86 Summer Institutes and Seminars Staff Member, Council for Philosophical Studies Summer Institute in Metaphysics, 1968 Staff member and director, Council for Philosophical Studies Summer Institute in Philosophy of Religion, 1973 Director, National Endowment for the Humanities Summer Seminar, 1974, 1975, 1978 Staff member and co-director (with William P. Alston) NEH Summer Institute in Philosophy of Religion (Bellingham, Washington) 1986 Instructor, Pew Younger Scholars Seminar, 1995, 1999 Co-director summer seminar on nature in belief, Calvin College, July, 2004 Other E. Harris Harbison Award for Distinguished Teaching (Danforth Foundation), 1968 Member, Council for Philosophical Studies, 1968-74 William Evans Visiting Fellow University of Otago (New Zealand) 1991 Mentor, Collegium, Fairfield University 1993 The James A.
    [Show full text]
  • Putnam and Diamond on Religious Belief and the “Gulfs Between Us” Sofia Miguens*
    The Monist, 2020, 103, 404–414 doi: 10.1093/monist/onaa013 Article Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/monist/article/103/4/404/5905779 by University of Chicago user on 03 November 2020 The Human Face of Naturalism: Putnam and Diamond on Religious Belief and the “Gulfs between Us” Sofia Miguens* ABSTRACT Hilary Putnam and Cora Diamond both wrote on Wittgenstein’s Three Lectures on Religious Belief. They did it quite differently; my ultimate aim in this article is to explore this difference. Putnam’s view of religion is largely a view of ethical life; I look thus into his writings on ethics and his proposals to face the relativist menace therein. Still, in his incursions into philosophy of religion, describing religious experience through authors such as Rosenzweig, Buber, or Levinas, Putnam deals with what Diamond calls, after Wittgenstein, “the gulfs between us.” Such gulfs, and the threat of relativism they bring, need to be accounted for. With that purpose in mind I complement Putnam’s reading of the Three Lectures with Diamond’s own reading. Those who know my writings from that period [the early 1950s] may wonder how I reconciled my religious streak, which existed to some extent even back then, and my general scientific materialist worldview at that time. The answer is that I didn’t recon- cile them. I was a thoroughgoing atheist, and I was a believer. I simply kept these two parts of myself separate. —Hilary Putnam (1992,1) 1. RELIGION AS ETHICS AND THE NATURE OF PUTNAM’S WRITINGS ON RELIGION How does religion, broadly conceived, sit with Putnam’s philosophy? In what follows I try to answer this question.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotle, Wittgenstein and Beholding Categories
    Bard College Bard Digital Commons Senior Projects Spring 2013 Bard Undergraduate Senior Projects Spring 2013 Aristotle, Wittgenstein and Beholding Categories Samuel Jonathan Shapiro Bard College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2013 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Recommended Citation Shapiro, Samuel Jonathan, "Aristotle, Wittgenstein and Beholding Categories" (2013). Senior Projects Spring 2013. 13. https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2013/13 This Open Access work is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been provided to you by Bard College's Stevenson Library with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this work in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Aristotle, Wittgenstein and Beholding Categories Senior Project submitted to The Division of Social Studies of Bard College by Sam Shapiro Annandale-on-Hudson, New York May 2013 In memory of Karolina Mroz 1991-2013 Table of Contents Preface Page 1 Chapter One: Aristotle's Categories I. The Pre-Predicamenta Page 10 II. Substance Page 20 Chapter Two: Classifying Nature I. Ralph Waldo Emerson and Nature Page 43 II. Michael Thompson: A Critique of Empiricism Page 60 Chapter Three: Ludwig Wittgenstein Inheriting Aristotle I. Words as Categories Page 69 II. Family Resemblances and Ramsey’s Maxim Page 81 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language
    SAUL A. KRIPKE Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language An Elementary Exposition Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts Contents Copyright © 1982 by Saul A. Kripke All rights reserved Preface Vll EIGHTH PRINTING, 1995 1 Introductory 1 Printed in the United States of America 2 The Wittgensteinian Paradox 7 3 The Solution and the 'Private Language' Argument 55 Postscript Wittgenstein and Other Minds Library ofCongress Cataloging in Publication Data 114 Index Kripke, Saul A., 1940- 147 Wittgenstein on rules and private language. Includes bibliographical references and index. Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1889-1951. I. Title B3376.W564K74 192 81-20070 AACR2 ISBN 0-674-95401-7 (paper) - To my parents Preface The main part ofthis work has been delivered at various places as lectures, series oflectures, or seminars. It constitutes, as I say, 'an elementary exposition' ofwhat I take to be the central thread of Wittgenstein's later work on the philosophy of language and the philosophy of mathematics, including my interpretation of the 'private language argument', which on my view is principally to be explicated in terms ofthe problem of 'following a rule'. A postscript presents another problem Wittgenstein saw in the conception ofprivate language, which leads to a discussion of some aspects of his views on the problem ofother minds. Since I stress the strong connection in Wittgenstein's later philosophy between the philosophy of psychology and the philosophy of mathematics, I had hoped to add a second postscript on the philosophy ofmathematics. Time has not permitted this, so for the moment the basic remarks on philosophy ofmathematics in the main text must suffice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem: the Theory of Ideas in Ancient Atomism and Gilles Deleuze
    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2013 The rP oblem: The Theory of Ideas in Ancient Atomism and Gilles Deleuze Ryan J. Johnson Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Johnson, R. (2013). The rP oblem: The Theory of Ideas in Ancient Atomism and Gilles Deleuze (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/706 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PROBLEM: THE THEORY OF IDEAS IN ANCIENT ATOMISM AND GILLES DELEUZE A Dissertation Submitted to the McAnulty College & Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Ryan J. Johnson May 2014 Copyright by Ryan J. Johnson 2014 ii THE PROBLEM: THE THEORY OF IDEAS IN ANCIENT ATOMISM AND GILLES DELEUZE By Ryan J. Johnson Approved December 6, 2013 _______________________________ ______________________________ Daniel Selcer, Ph.D Kelly Arenson, Ph.D Associate Professor of Philosophy Assistant Professor of Philosophy (Committee Chair) (Committee Member) ______________________________ John Protevi, Ph.D Professor of Philosophy (Committee Member) ______________________________ ______________________________ James Swindal, Ph.D. Ronald Polansky, Ph.D. Dean, McAnulty College & Graduate Chair, Department of Philosophy School of Liberal Arts Professor of Philosophy Professor of Philosophy iii ABSTRACT THE PROBLEM: THE THEORY OF IDEAS IN ANCIENT ATOMISM AND GILLES DELEUZE By Ryan J. Johnson May 2014 Dissertation supervised by Dr.
    [Show full text]