therefore met. With the threshold met, disclosure of the information is based on whether it would “constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” 5 U.S.C. § 552(b) (6). This requires balancing the individual right to privacy against the public interest in disclosure, which is defined as the extent to which disclosure would shed light on an agency’s performance of its statutory duties. Dep’t of the Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 372 (1976). With regard to the information in question, it is clearly established that there is typically no public interest in employee cell phone numbers. In contrast, there is at least some privacy interest in keeping that information confidential. Smith v. Dep't of Labor, 798 F. Supp. 2d 274, 283-85 (D.D.C. 2011). We have considered the extent to which disclosure of the above information would serve the public interest, but have determined that absent a justification to the contrary, any such interest is de minimis when weighed against the personal privacy interests at issue. As such, withholding is clearly appropriate under FOIA Exemption 6. The information withheld under this FOIA Exemption is clearly marked and is readily identifiable. If you owe fees for the processing of this request, an invoice containing the amount due and payment instructions will be enclosed. You also have the right to seek dispute resolution services from the FAA FOIA Public Liaison via phone (202-267-7799) or email (
[email protected]) noting FOIA Public Liaison in the subject line or the Office of Government Information Services (https://ogis.archives.gov) via phone (202-741-5770 / toll-free--1-877-684-6448; fax--202-741-5769); or email (
[email protected]).