Book Review Section Show Clearly Is How Effective Burnet Actually Publishers, 1991 (Australasian Studies in Was in This Role

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Book Review Section Show Clearly Is How Effective Burnet Actually Publishers, 1991 (Australasian Studies in Was in This Role stirrer of public consciousness on a number Book Review of issues - a man with opinions on every- thing from uranium mining to eugenics, from Section smoking to medical education - with an inclination to put his arguments forcibly and with an authority that guaranteed that his Compiled by John Jenkin* views could not be ignored. Many of Australia's immunologists and microbiologists knew Burnet. These scien- Christopher Sexton, The Seeds of Time: tists will read the book out of interest rather The Life of Sir Macfarlane Burnet. Mel- than to find out more about him; they may bourne: Oxford University Press, 1991. x + hope that the book will do nothing to dimin- 301 pp., illus., $39.95. ish the image of a man they held in admi- ration. From people who knew Burnet, I have Sir (Frank) Macfarlane Burnet was a great heard generally favourable comments. biological scientist. He was responsible for The second group of readers comprises several major technical developments and Australian scientists who did not know Bur- conceptual insights in his first field of net, and that is my own perspective. To an research, virology, and for two conceptual immunologist who came to Australia after breakthroughs in his second, immunology. Burnet had retired, a life of Burnet holds His work was seminal - many of the impor- particular interest. The question has arisen tant steps leading to the development of viral amongst younger and emigre immunologists vaccines can be traced back to techniques whether the continuing focus on Burnet is worked up by Burnet, and much of the excit- unhealthy; but the evidence is that Austra- ing cellular and molecular immunology of the lian immunology is healthy in its diversity, last twenty years consists of answers to ques- that it has plenty of leadership, and that the tions that make sense only in the context of tribute to Burnet results from a mixture of Burnet's theories. He received the Nobel respect and courtesy rather than any unheal- Prize, jointly with Sir Peter Medawar, for one thy personality-cult. Indeed, Burnet in his of these, the concept that the immune system later years believed that immunology had distinguishes self from non-self, and the con- more or less run its course; his disciples have sequent concept of immunological tolerance. spectacularly proved him wrong but have had He and many other immunologists regarded the discretion not to point this out. the tolerance work as second in importance To Australian immunologists and micro- to his other major contribution to immunol- biologists who did not know Burnet, Sexton's ogy, the clonal selection theory for antibody book is full of interest. A comparison with formation. Virologists felt he might well have Fenner's biographical memoir of Burnet sug- earned a Nobel Prize for his virology studies, gests that Sexton's book is accurate, but of and he was indeed nominated for one. What- course it contains much more in the way of ever the limitations of prizes as indicators of personal detail, while Fenner's memoir con- merit, it would be hard to shrug off one Nobel centrates on the science.l Prize and two near-misses. The largest potential readership com- I have not yet used the word 'Australian' prises people further removed from detailed - Burnet was a great scientist on the world knowledge of the subject - people who nei- stage. His importance to Australian biologi- ther knew Burnet personally nor are active cal science eclipses that of others like Howard in his fields of research in Australia. This is Florey, because Burnet did most of his work a diverse group, and Burnet's later years as in Australia, built up an Institute that is a commentator on controversial issues will still possibly Australia's premier research interest a wider group than is usual for a centre, and inspired a generation of scientists biography of a great scientist. For the general who still dominate Australian biological reader, the book is well written and readable. science. Christopher Sexton has not shirked the task Burnet retired from experimental biology of explaining the scientific aspects in general at the age of 65 and started a second career, terms, and I believe the non-scientist would which spanned another 20 years. He wrote at least get a general grasp of the relevance extensively on biology during this later of Burnet's work. period, but was also a philosopher, elder and What does this book offer to the reader interested in how science and scientists * Dr J.G. Jenkin is a Reader in Physics at La Trobe work? In discussing this, it is appropriate to University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083. compare Burnet with Medawar. The two men Historical Records of Australian Science, 9(1) (June 19921 were very different. Medawar was consciously Historical Records of Australian Science, Volume 9, Number 1 (and delightfully) an aristocrat amongst Burnet's experimental skill was most rele- intellectuals, a renowned wit, and at ease vant to his virus work. He adapted a tech- with everybody. Burnet considered himself to nique for growing virus in eggs and continued be at a 'low place in the peck-order', in spite to adapt it until it became in his hands a of recognition bestowed on him.2 He wrote in powerful set of techniques, for assaying virus a straightforward, undecorated style, and (by injecting low numbers and counting was something of a social recluse. Medawar's 'pocks'), for assaying antibody against virus, essays, collected together in books such as and for the production of virus in sufficient The Art of the Soluble (Penguin, 1967) and quantity for vaccination. The appearance of Pluto's Republic (OUP, 19841, have influenced the pocks gave him clues on relationships the way we perceive how science works, not between viruses. His skill came partly from least because they were written by a success- his observation of detail (which he ascribed ful scientist who happened also to be a phi- to his hobby as a naturalist) and partly from losopher. Burnet didn't try to analyse, at least his tendency (again ascribed to his beetle- not for public consumption, how science collecting) to 'collect' information; having got works. And yet, if we understand the thought the technique working, he applied it to every processes of a man who made not one but virus that came to hand. His skill as an two major conceptual advances in immunol- experimentalist, and his continuation of lab- ogy, the working habits of a man who made oratory work with his own hands up until he several seminal discoveries in virology, and retired, is an important lesson for today, the interpersonal skills of a man who so when scientists, and medical researchers in dominated Australian biological science, then particular, tend to conduct their research we may obtain some insight into how science from their desk, with students and techni- and scientists work. Sexton's book is helpful cians doing the experiments. Burnet's pas- in this regard, although I found that I under- sion for 'collecting' information would be less stood Burnet as a scientist better when I had acceptable today, and would probably be also read Fenner's memoir and Burnet's labelled by any peer-review process as a autobiography. 'fishing expedition'. Burnet, as portrayed by Sexton, was not Burnet's most important immunological driven to medical research by a burning insight, the clonal selection theory of anti- desire to help humanity. Indeed, he seems to body formation, was not fully vindicated until have been somewhat indifferent to the suffer- many years after its formulation. Burnet ing of patients in his early days, developing used the term 'intrinsic unlikelihood' to only later a mission to overcome scourges describe what worried him about one of the such as influenza, over-population and the rival theories, which held that antigen was effects of smoking. This is probably not un- used as template for the design of antibody to fit the antigen. But clonal selection, or usual. The public image of the 'dedicated' earlier selective (as opposed to instructive) medical researcher is pleasant but inaccur- theories, implied that the immune system ate; scientists work long hours because of had a pre-existing repertoir, enabling it to their fascination with their work rather than react to an unbelievably large variety of anti- their dedication to helping mankind. gens, equally intrinsically unlikely. Burnet Sexton discusses the features of Burnet's postulated a mechanism of 'randomization' of work that seem to have had most bearing on the immunoglobulin genes by somatic muta- his success - his ecological approach to tion, such that a wide variety of different infectious agents, his wide reading, his abil- antibodies could be made. He was right in ity to integrate information from disparate essence, but it was a conceptual leap well fields, his capacity far lateral thinking. The beyond the experimental techniques of the discussion is interesting and informative. day to test. Clonal selection did not 'feel right' The same characteristics can be discerned until years later, when the genetic mecha- more precisely from the memoir and partic- nisms for generating diversity were discov- ularly from the autobiography, where they ered. An important knack required of a are more vivid because of t.he author's infec- scientist is the ability to decide which areas tious enthusiasm. Sexton's book provides an of uncertainty make a hypothesis untenable introduction to Burnet; anyone seriously and which will sort themselves out later. interested should also read Fenner and Bur- Regarding Burnet's second career - as net. There is space here to discuss only two elder, philosopher, stirrer of the public con- of the important characteristics of Burnet sciousness - Sexton brings out Burnet's sin- the scientist - his skill as an experimenter, cerity and honesty in these endeavours, and and his ability to see in a mass of data a indicates that they provoked a wide response, plausible model.
Recommended publications
  • Microbe Hunters Revisited Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
    INTERNATL MICROBIOL (1998) 1: 65-68 65 © Springer-Verlag Ibérica 1998 PERSPECTIVES William C. Summers Microbe Hunters revisited Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA Correspondence to: William C. Summers. Yale University School of Medicine. 333 Cedar St. New Haven, CT 06520-8040. USA. Tel.: +1-203-785 2986. Fax: +1-203-785 6309. E-mail: [email protected] It was the mid-1950s and I was a teenager when I first Indeed, Microbe Hunters is a book about success: tales of read Microbe Hunters by Paul Henry De Kruif (Zealand, MI, brilliant research, incisive investigations, and heroic 1890–Holland, MI, 1971). It was the right time and the right personalities. Yet it is far from “history-objectively written.” age; I was fascinated. Here were heros enough to satisfy any The formula that De Kruif hit upon in Microbe Hunters served bookish young man interested in the natural world. Microbe him well: between 1928 and 1957 he wrote eleven more books Hunters was a book that inspired a generation or more of on medical and scientific topics, all with the same “exciting budding young microbiologists [4]. Not only that, however. narrative” and sense of drama. Some of these books were best- It established a metaphor and a genre of science writing that sellers and selected by the popular Book-of-the-Month Club. has often been imitated. None, however, matched the popularity and appeal of Microbe Microbe Hunters is a series of 12 stories that describe major Hunters. events in the history of microbiology, from microscopic De Kruif’s stories are full-scale dramatizations, complete observations of animalcules (literally “little animals”) by with fictional dialog of the historical subjects, and first person Leeuwenhoek (“First of the Microbe Hunters”) to Paul Ehrlich’s interjections of the voice of the narrator, De Kruif.
    [Show full text]
  • Balcomk41251.Pdf (558.9Kb)
    Copyright by Karen Suzanne Balcom 2005 The Dissertation Committee for Karen Suzanne Balcom Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Discovery and Information Use Patterns of Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine Committee: E. Glynn Harmon, Supervisor Julie Hallmark Billie Grace Herring James D. Legler Brooke E. Sheldon Discovery and Information Use Patterns of Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine by Karen Suzanne Balcom, B.A., M.L.S. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August, 2005 Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my first teachers: my father, George Sheldon Balcom, who passed away before this task was begun, and to my mother, Marian Dyer Balcom, who passed away before it was completed. I also dedicate it to my dissertation committee members: Drs. Billie Grace Herring, Brooke Sheldon, Julie Hallmark and to my supervisor, Dr. Glynn Harmon. They were all teachers, mentors, and friends who lifted me up when I was down. Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my committee: Julie Hallmark, Billie Grace Herring, Jim Legler, M.D., Brooke E. Sheldon, and Glynn Harmon for their encouragement, patience and support during the nine years that this investigation was a work in progress. I could not have had a better committee. They are my enduring friends and I hope I prove worthy of the faith they have always showed in me. I am grateful to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Bancroft of Dedham and Reading, Massachusetts and Some
    1940] Thomas Bancroft and Some of His Descendants 215 THOMAS BANCROFT OF DEDHAM AND READING, MASS., AND SOME OF HIS DESCENDANTS Contributed by JOHN KERMOTT ALLEN, of Boston, Mass. 1. THOMAS BANCROFT, of Dedham and Reading, Mass., a native of England,* born about 1625,t died at Lynn, Mass., 19 Aug. 1691.t He married first at Dedham, 31: 1 mo. 1647, ALICE BACON, who died 29: 1 mo. 1648, daughter of Michael Bacon;§ and secondly, at Dedham, 15: 7 mo. 1648, ELIZABETH METCALF, baptized at St. Benedict's, Norwich, England, 20 Sept. 1626, died at Reading 11 May 1711, aged 85 years, daughter of Michael and Sarah (Ellwyn) Metcalf. (See REGISTER, vol. 6, pp. 171-173; vol. 78, p. 64.) The exact date of Thomas Bancroft's arrival in the Massachusetts Bay Colony is unknown. He may have come with his brother John Bancroft in 1632. He was made fatherless in England in 1627, but as his stepmother lived until 1639, it is probable that he remained in England rather than, when but ten years old, make the migration to America with his brother. The death of his stepmother in 1639 in England would have left him free to follow his relatives to America in 1640. In his "History of Lynn" Newhall includes "Lieut. Thomas Bancroft" among the newcomers in 1640. Thomas Bancroft, the subject of this article, was then but eighteen years old and could scarcely be correctly described as "lieutenant." However, he ac­ quired this title later, and was thereafter always r-eferred to as "Lieutenant Thomas Bancroft" or as "Ensign," so it is probable that he did come to Lynn among the newcomers in 1640.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Army's Contribution to Tropical Medicine
    ORIGINALREVIEW RESEARCH ClinicalClinical Medicine Medicine 2018 2017 Vol Vol 18, 17, No No 5: 6: 380–3 380–8 T h e B r i t i s h A r m y ’ s c o n t r i b u t i o n t o t r o p i c a l m e d i c i n e Authors: J o n a t h a n B l a i r T h o m a s H e r r o nA a n d J a m e s A l e x a n d e r T h o m a s D u n b a r B general to the forces), was the British Army’s first major contributor Infectious disease has burdened European armies since the 3 Crusades. Beginning in the 18th century, therefore, the British to tropical medicine. He lived in the 18th century when many Army has instituted novel methods for the diagnosis, prevention more soldiers died from infections than were killed in battle. Pringle and treatment of tropical diseases. Many of the diseases that observed the poor living conditions of the army and documented are humanity’s biggest killers were characterised by medical the resultant disease, particularly dysentery (then known as bloody ABSTRACT officers and the acceptance of germ theory heralded a golden flux). Sanitation was non-existent and soldiers defecated outside era of discovery and development. Luminaries of tropical their own tents. Pringle linked hygiene and dysentery, thereby medicine including Bruce, Wright, Leishman and Ross firmly contradicting the accepted ‘four humours’ theory of the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureate Surgeons
    Literature Review World Journal of Surgery and Surgical Research Published: 12 Mar, 2020 Nobel Laureate Surgeons Jayant Radhakrishnan1* and Mohammad Ezzi1,2 1Department of Surgery and Urology, University of Illinois, USA 2Department of Surgery, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia Abstract This is a brief account of the notable contributions and some foibles of surgeons who have won the Nobel Prize for physiology or medicine since it was first awarded in 1901. Keywords: Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine; Surgical Nobel laureates; Pathology and surgery Introduction The Nobel Prize for physiology or medicine has been awarded to 219 scientists in the last 119 years. Eleven members of this illustrious group are surgeons although their awards have not always been for surgical innovations. Names of these surgeons with the year of the award and why they received it are listed below: Emil Theodor Kocher - 1909: Thyroid physiology, pathology and surgery. Alvar Gullstrand - 1911: Path of refracted light through the ocular lens. Alexis Carrel - 1912: Methods for suturing blood vessels and transplantation. Robert Barany - 1914: Function of the vestibular apparatus. Frederick Grant Banting - 1923: Extraction of insulin and treatment of diabetes. Alexander Fleming - 1945: Discovery of penicillin. Walter Rudolf Hess - 1949: Brain mapping for control of internal bodily functions. Werner Theodor Otto Forssmann - 1956: Cardiac catheterization. Charles Brenton Huggins - 1966: Hormonal control of prostate cancer. OPEN ACCESS Joseph Edward Murray - 1990: Organ transplantation. *Correspondence: Shinya Yamanaka-2012: Reprogramming of mature cells for pluripotency. Jayant Radhakrishnan, Department of Surgery and Urology, University of Emil Theodor Kocher (August 25, 1841 to July 27, 1917) Illinois, 1502, 71st, Street Darien, IL Kocher received the award in 1909 “for his work on the physiology, pathology and surgery of the 60561, Chicago, Illinois, USA, thyroid gland” [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Microbe Hunters Revisited •Fi Paul De Kruif and the Beginning of Popular
    The Texas Medical Center Library DigitalCommons@TMC John P. McGovern Historical Collections and Houston History of Medicine Lectures Research Center 3-7-2012 Microbe Hunters Revisited – Paul de Kruif and the Beginning of Popular Science Writing Stephen Greenberg Baylor College of Medicine Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/homl Part of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, and the Medicine and Health Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Citation Information:Greenberg, Stephen, "Microbe Hunters Revisited – Paul de Kruif and the Beginning of Popular Science Writing" (2012). DigitalCommons@TMC, John P. McGovern Historical Collections and Research Center, Houston History of Medicine Lectures. Paper 7. https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/homl/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the John P. McGovern Historical Collections and Research Center at DigitalCommons@TMC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Houston History of Medicine Lectures by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@TMC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Houston History of Medicine Microbe Hunters Revisited March 7, 2011 Microbe Hunters Revisited – Paul de Kruif and the Beginning of Popular Science Writing Date: March 7, 2012 Speaker: Stephen Greenberg, M.D., Dean of Medical Education, Baylor College of Medicine Abstract: Paul de Kruif is credited with being one of the first popular science writers for the general public. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Michigan in 1916 and worked at the Rockefeller Institute under Simon Flexner. After being fired in 1922 for publishing a scathing article on medical research, de Kruif caught the attention of Sinclair Lewis, who used his scientific background to write his Pulitzer Prize winning novel, Arrowsmith.
    [Show full text]
  • 2-Microbe-Hunters-Paul-De-Kruif.Pdf
    Microbe Hunters Paul de Kruif To RHEA A Harvest/HBJ Book Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers San Diego New York London Copyright 1926 by Paul de Kruif Copyright renewed 1954 by Paul de Kruif All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Table of Contents 1. LEEUWENHOEK: First of the Microbe Hunters 2. SPALLANZANI: Microbes Must Have Parents! 3. PASTEUR: Microbes Are a Menace! 4. KOCH: The Death Fighter 5. PASTEUR: And the Mad Dog 6. ROUX AND BEHRING: Massacre the Guinea-Pigs 7. METCHNIKOFF: The Nice Phagocytes 8. THEOBALD SMITH: Ticks and Texas Fever 9. BRUCE: Trail of the Tsetse 10. ROSS VS. GRASSI: Malaria 11. WALTER REED: In the Interest of Science-and for Humanity! 12. PAUL EHRLICH: The Magic Bullet Footnotes Books by Paul de Kruif 1. LEEUWENHOEK: First of the Microbe Hunters 1 Two hundred and fifty years ago an obscure man named Leeuwenhoek looked for the first time into a mysterious new world peopled with a thousand different kinds of tiny beings, some ferocious and deadly, others friendly and useful, many of them more important to mankind than any continent or archipelago. Leeuwenhoek, unsung and scarce remembered, is now almost as unknown as his strange little animals and plants were at the time he discovered them. This is the story of Leeuwenhoek, the first of the microbe hunters. It is the tale of the bold and persistent and curious explorers and fighters of death who came after him.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory Brisbane 1888 Hollander
    This sampler file contains various sample pages from the product. Sample pages will often include: the title page, an index, and other pages of interest. This sample is fully searchable (read Search Tips) but is not FASTFIND enabled. To view more samplers click here www.gould.com.au www.archivecdbooks.com.au · The widest range of Australian, English, · Over 1600 rare Australian and New Zealand Irish, Scottish and European resources books on fully searchable CD-ROM · 11000 products to help with your research · Over 3000 worldwide · A complete range of Genealogy software · Including: Government and Police 5000 data CDs from numerous countries gazettes, Electoral Rolls, Post Office and Specialist Directories, War records, Regional Subscribe to our weekly email newsletter histories etc. FOLLOW US ON TWITTER AND FACEBOOK www.unlockthepast.com.au · Promoting History, Genealogy and Heritage in Australia and New Zealand · A major events resource · regional and major roadshows, seminars, conferences, expos · A major go-to site for resources www.familyphotobook.com.au · free information and content, www.worldvitalrecords.com.au newsletters and blogs, speaker · Free software download to create biographies, topic details · 50 million Australasian records professional looking personal photo books, · Includes a team of expert speakers, writers, · 1 billion records world wide calendars and more organisations and commercial partners · low subscriptions · FREE content daily and some permanently This sampler file includes the title page and various sample pages from this volume. This file is fully searchable (read search tips page) but is not FASTFIND enabled Brisbane Post Office Directory and Country Guide 1888 Ref. AU4116-1888 ISBN: 978 1 921315 19 0 This book was kindly loaned to Archive CD Books Australia by the University of Queensland Library http://www.library.uq.edu.au Navigating this CD To view the contents of this CD use the bookmarks and Adobe Reader’s forward and back buttons to browse through the pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureates in Physiology Or Medicine
    All Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine 1901 Emil A. von Behring Germany ”for his work on serum therapy, especially its application against diphtheria, by which he has opened a new road in the domain of medical science and thereby placed in the hands of the physician a victorious weapon against illness and deaths” 1902 Sir Ronald Ross Great Britain ”for his work on malaria, by which he has shown how it enters the organism and thereby has laid the foundation for successful research on this disease and methods of combating it” 1903 Niels R. Finsen Denmark ”in recognition of his contribution to the treatment of diseases, especially lupus vulgaris, with concentrated light radiation, whereby he has opened a new avenue for medical science” 1904 Ivan P. Pavlov Russia ”in recognition of his work on the physiology of digestion, through which knowledge on vital aspects of the subject has been transformed and enlarged” 1905 Robert Koch Germany ”for his investigations and discoveries in relation to tuberculosis” 1906 Camillo Golgi Italy "in recognition of their work on the structure of the nervous system" Santiago Ramon y Cajal Spain 1907 Charles L. A. Laveran France "in recognition of his work on the role played by protozoa in causing diseases" 1908 Paul Ehrlich Germany "in recognition of their work on immunity" Elie Metchniko France 1909 Emil Theodor Kocher Switzerland "for his work on the physiology, pathology and surgery of the thyroid gland" 1910 Albrecht Kossel Germany "in recognition of the contributions to our knowledge of cell chemistry made through his work on proteins, including the nucleic substances" 1911 Allvar Gullstrand Sweden "for his work on the dioptrics of the eye" 1912 Alexis Carrel France "in recognition of his work on vascular suture and the transplantation of blood vessels and organs" 1913 Charles R.
    [Show full text]
  • A Zoologist for Malaria*
    187-324 Contributios 3.2 4/5/07 08:40 Página 187 CONTRIBUTIONS to SCIENCE, 3 (2): 187–195 (2006) Institut d’Estudis Catalans, Barcelona DOI: 10.2436/20.7010.01.5 ISSN: 1575-6343 www.cat-science.com focus Battista Grassi: a zoologist for malaria* E. Capanna** Museo di Anatomia Comparata “Battista Grassi” Università di Roma “La Sapienza” e Centro Linceo Interdisciplinare “Beniamino Segre”, Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Roma, Italy Malaria is probably one of the oldest diseases, and it has been tion of natural resources and accordingly lower economic prof- the scourge of populations in tropical and temperate-hot areas its. Therefore, prominent scientists decided to tackle the prob- of the world since antiquity. It is also known by its French term, lem of “paludisme” in France and in Great Britain. Of these, the paludisme although the Italian name, malaria, more accurately three who were the most important for our story are described. describes the disease. The Italian term refers to mala aria, bad Charles Louis Alphonse Laveran (1845–1922) was a military air, i.e., the miasmas evaporating from the stagnant waters of physician in Algeria when, on 6 November 1880, at the age of marshes, which the ancients believed were the origin of the 33, he described malarial parasites in the blood of patients dur- disease. It was not until the second half of the nineteenth cen- ing malarial fever episodes (Laveran, 1880, 1881). He called tury that scientists started to search for the agent that gave rise this microscopic organism Oscillaria malariae. The discovery to malaria.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Vision 17, 33-52 (2017)
    Science Vision 17, 33-52 (2017) Available at SCIENCE VISION www.sciencevision.org SCIENCE VISION Historical Research OPEN ACCESS The making of oncology: The tales of false carcinogenic worms K. Lalchhandama Department of Zoology, Pachhunga University College, Aizawl 796001, Mizoram, India Cancer is a disease of antiquity. The Ancient Greeks were familiar with onkos (from Received 23 January 2017 Accepted 15 February 2017 which we have the term oncology)—tumour of all sorts. Hippocrates coined karki- nos and karkinoma, our source of the words cancer and carcinoma. Of a plethora *For correspondence : of carcinogens, parasitic worms (helminths) constitute a considerable health con- [email protected] cern. Three trematodes, Clonorchis sinensis, Opisthorchis viverrini, and Schisto- soma haematobium are now officially classified carcinogens. But the discovery of helminths as cancer-causing agents took wrong turns and marks an inglorious chapter in the history of science. The carcinogenicity of worms, vindicating Rudolf Virchow’s reiztheorie (irritation theory) of cancer origin, was glorified in the scien- tific forefront by Johannes Fibiger in the 1910s. Discovery of a new nematode, which he proudly named Spiroptera carcinoma, and his subsequent demonstration that the parasite could induce stomach cancer in rats, earned Fibiger a retrospec- tive Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1926, and a lasting fame. But not in an appealing way. His achievement did not withstand the test of time. S. carci- noma was annulled as an invalid taxon in zoology—supplanted by Gongylonema neoplasticum—and eventually was branded as a non-carcinogenic agent. Contact us : [email protected] Key words: Gongylonema neoplasticum; helminth; Fibiger; cancer; Nobel Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • The Locomotive
    KBHtW UBK BBOmHibbrshh Mil PRESENTED BY THE PUBLISHERS form 3« [io-i5-os-5rii] Wife ftote-nte PUBLISHED BY THE HARTFORD STEAM BOILER INSPECTION AND INSURANCE COMPANY. Vol. XXVII. HARTFORD, CONN., JANUARY, 1908. No. 1. ; THE LOCOMOTIVE. [January, >K %. Joseph Bancroft Pierce. It is with the deepest sorrow that we record the death of Joseph Bancroft Pierce, who had been secretary of the Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company for nearly thirty-five years. He had been in poor health for several weeks, but the end was quite unexpected, for he had been confined to his home in Hartford for only four days when, on November 12, 1907, he died of pneumonia. The story of Mr. Pierce's life is a simple one, devoid of incidents likely to stimulate the imagination, or even to attract more than passing notice from the world about him. It is the story of a genial, lovable gentleman, who was content to 'perform, each day, the task of that day, and who found his highest reward in the consciousness that the work that was done was done well. Mr. Pierce was born October 13, 1835, in the town now known as Thomaston, Connecticut', ^feut which, previous to 1875, formed a part of Plymouth, and was known as/ Ph mouth Hollow. His parents were Hiram and Charlotte S. ( Bancroft )[', Pierce. He was educated at Thomaston, where he attended the high school r.nd academy. About the time of his leaving the academy he was stricken with a serious pulmonary 'affection r.nd in 1854, at the age of nineteen, he came to Hartford for medical treatment, remaining in the city about a month.
    [Show full text]