DOCSLIB.ORG

The Archer's Bow in Homeric Poems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Archer's Bow in Homeric Poems PtR-SiyM (j'*'f>n » 0) MoQERN ^tRSV'^^ N American N Ar-\t Rl CAM MoToKoloqical C la^si f ica.t i on Composite Bovn/s Btlov^ A tKt bows art o| woool. or^ Worn. Alaove A tKt bows art o| wood. «n<a/ korn. — 2 Henry Balfour.—The Archer s Bow in the Homeric Poems. There are two principal references to the Homeric poems with which we are mainly concerned in connection with this study : (1) The description of the bow of Pandarus in the fourth book of the Iliad (line 105 et seq.). (2) The description of the bow of Odysseus given in the twenty -first book of the Odyssey. According to Homeric tradition, these two bows were derived from different for sources ; that of Pandarus (a Lycian of Asia Minor) was apparently made locally Iphitus, Pandarus himself ; the bow of Odysseus (chief of Ithaca) was given to him by son of Eurytus, king of CEchalia, which most authors have located in Thessaly. How Iphitus came by this bow does not transpire. Thus, although the bow of Pandarus was definitely of Western Asiatic origin, the Odyssean bow had been derived from a Greek source, though we have no direct clue as to the country of its manufacture. In spite of the possibly different provenences of the two bows which Homer had in mind, it is well to consider both together, since the two descriptions seem to a great extent to supplement one another, and together help to explain the type of bow referred to by the poet. In endeavouring to arrive at a diagnostic conclusion, we must bear in mind that Homer, in all probability, was not himself addicted to archery, and that his knowledge of the bow was derived from casual and uncritical observation, rather than from any practical experience. He was a ballad-monger, not a soldier ; an artist, not a scientist ; a romanticist rather than a pragmatist. Hence, in describing even familiar objects, accuracy in detail concerned him less than picturesqueness in expression. A master of epic poetry and narrative, wholly satisfying as such, he yet leaves us longing for details which he might have supplied, and we have to struggle to fill the gaps which he leaves in the archaeological picture. He often, no doubt, describes what he saw, though with an uncritical eye, and his descriptions have a real value to the archaeologist, inasmuch as they afford, at least, suggestive hints of actuality ; and, moreover, their very meagreness, by leaving us unsatisfied, tends to stimulate enquiry on scientific lines. Of the bow of the Lycian Pandarus, Homer informs us that it was of large size (fieya Tofo-') and was made from the horns of a wild goat (l^uXov 01709 aypiov) which were 16 handbreadths in length (eKKaoSeKeiSaipa) ; that these had been prepared, fitted together, polished and furnished with gilded tips by a skilled artificer (a worker in horn, Kepao^oo'; T€KTa>v) ; that the bow was kept, when off-duty, in a bow-case (Boeia). (cf. icrvXa to^op) ; that the bow-string was made of ox-sinews {vevpa When drawn, the bow assumed an extreme curvature {KVKkorepe'i fieya ro^ov erewev). These are points which are germane to our enquiry into the .structure of the bow, and I omit reference to other incidental points which have no special bearing upon this problem. — Henry Balfour.—The Archer's Bow in the Homeric Poems. 3 Thf bow of Odysseus, we are told, was also of large size {fJ^eya ro^ov), and \\as kept in a decorated bow-case (yoypurw, o? ol -jrepiKeno t^aeu'o?). Again, the only material mentioned in connection with its construction is hont. In its unstrung {iraXivToio';), state it was refiexed curved or sinuous {uyKvXa or tcafiTrvka) ; this is a very important point repeatedly emphasized by Homer. The surface was polished [ev^oov). The bow was exceedingly difficult to string, and part of the test imposed upon her suitors by Penelope was to string the bow as a preliminary to shooting with it. Leiodes failed and so did Eurymachus and others of the yomiger men, and even the son of the house, Telemachus, did not succeed in stringing this mightv weapon. We may gather that knack, as well as strength, was required for the stringing, since Odysseus strung the bow without effort [arep o-TrouSr;?). " even as an expert on the phorminx and in minstrelsie easily strains a cord around a new tuning- peg." In order to render the bow more supple and yielding, the suitors warmed it at the fire and anointed it well with fat. That the bow was very liable to injury from damp and other causes, we may infer from the fact that not only was it j^ro- vided with a protecting bow-case, but Odysseus never took it to sea with him on his expeditions, always leaving it at home. These are the chief points in the Homeric rendering to which I wish to call special attention. Shooting-bows, in general, may be classified into four principal groups : " " (1) The plain or self bow, consisting of a single stave, usually of wood. (2) Compound bows, built up by uniting two or more staves of similar materials. (3) Composite bows, in which the bow is formed by the union of staves of different materials. (4) Sinew-backed bows (a variety of the composite bow), in which increased strength and resiliency are given by the addition of a layer of longitudinally- disposed sinews. This elastic reinforcement is applied to the back of the bow, i.e. the surface which, in shooting, is furthest from the archer. It is with the last two groups that I am especially concerned, since, as I pointed out in 1889, sucli evidence as we have clearly indicates that the Homeric bows were of composite .structure reinforced with a smew-backing. Let us consider first the material of which the bows both of Paudarus and Odys.seus are said to have been constructed. In both cases horn is the only material mentioned. In the description of the bow of Pandarus it is specified that the horns used in its construction were those of a wild mountain goat, killed by Pandarus himself, and therefore, ])resuniably, locally. The local sjjccies of wild goat in Western Asia Minor is the Persian Wild Goat, or Pasang {Capra hircus aegagrua), which is and was abundant in the Taurus Mountains, at no great distance from the Lycian home of'Pandarus, and is commonly believed to be the parent stock from which tlio domesticated goats are descended. ! 4 Henry Balfour.—The Archer's Bow in the Homeric Poems. If we examine the horns of this wdld goat, we readily observe two facts. Firstly, we cannot fail to note that if the natural horns, after being cut off the skull, were " merely set base to base and miited by means of a centre-piece or " grip (tttJ^h?), as seems to be suggested by several writers upon the subject,^ the resultant bow, while it might possess artistic qualities and gratify poetic aspirations, would be entirely useless for purposes of archery. The horns would be practically imbendable, and would virtually have no resiliency at all, since, as in all the cavicorn ruminants, the FIG. 1. HOKK or THE PERSIAN WILD GOAT AND DISSECTION SHOWING THE BONY CORE WHICH SUPPORTS THE HORN SHEATH. 0-6 AND C-d, TRANSVERSE SECTIONS THROUGH THE HORN AND THE CORE. horns of the goat grow upon a central rigid core of bone (Fig. 1). Were they flexible, they would be of little practical use to the goat Moreover, if the sheathings of true horn were drawn off their bony cores, the result would hardly be more effective, since, owing to their shape and structure, they would still remain practically inflexible. Hence we may, I thinlc, confidently rule out the suggestion that the entire horns could have been so used, whether with or without their skeletal supports of bone. 1 Cf. T. P. Seymour, Life in the Homeric Age, 1907, p. 668, Henry Balfour.—The Archer's Bow in the Homeric Poems. 6 Indeed, some more elaborate process of manufacture than that of merely joining together the pair of natural horns is indicated by the statement thnt a speciahst (Kepao^6o<; tsktuv) was called in to make the bow. Secondly, we may notice that if, as was suggested by Colonel Lane Fox in 1877,^ strips or staves were cut from the horns to make the bow, the resultant weapon would be so weak and flexible that a small child could easily string and draw the bow, which would still be ineffective as a serious weapon. Staves of sufficient thickness and width to serve the purpose vnaided could not be cut from the horns of a single animal. Only the front and hind narrow marginal ridges would furnish material of any degree of thickness, and even these would be far too thin and narrow (see Fig. 1, transverse sections, a-b, c-d). That the horns must have been cut down, in length at any rate, may reasonably be inferred from Homer's statement as to their length — 16 handbreadths each {eKKaiBeKdSwpa), equivalent to about 48 to 50 inches, an unusual though by no means unrecorded size for this species of goat. H these, or staves cut from them, in their full length were united together end to end, the bow would have measured 96 to 100 inches m length (8 feet to 8 feet 4 inches). If it was Homer's intention to convey this impression, we must, I fear, conclude that, in describing the fieya to^ov, or " long-bow," of Pandarus, the poet was also, metaphorically, " drawing it." It has been suggested to me more than once that the fact of Odysseus remaining seated while he discharged his " test " arrow (e'/c ^ij>poio Kadrj/Mevo';, Odyssey, xxi, 420) proves that the bow cannot have been of great length.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crossing the Boundaries in Kushner and Shakespeare Grant Williams, University of Pittsburgh
    Crossing the Boundaries in Kushner and Shakespeare Grant Williams, University of Pittsburgh Both the theater and criticism depends upon the production of the new and the reappropriation of the old. -Charles R. Lyons (97) […] the need to rehearse and renegotiate the relationship with memory and the past is nowhere more specifically expressed in human culture than in theatrical performance. -Marvin Carlson (167) arold Bloom says, “Genre, frequently metaphoric in Shakespeare, is particularly uneasy in Troilus and H Cressida, variously termed satire, comedy, history, tragedy, or what you will” (327). Moving forward to Tony Kushner’s two- part epic, Angels in America, we find another work that refuses simple classification. David Savran says of it, “Angels is a promiscuously complicated play that is very difficult to categorize […] evoking characteristics that are usually associated with both comedy and tragedy” (15). Many of the reasons for their categorical elusiveness obviously differ, but both plays employ an idea of disease as means by which corruption and politics of exclusion are problematized and changed. In Troilus and Cressida, the audience is confronted with an honored society that, underneath a noble façade, possesses a “Most putrefied core” (5.9.1). Shakespeare uses disease as a thematic tool to align theatrical entertainment with society’s own use of marginalization in order to build a connection between the characters onstage and the audience. Kushner uses disease, vis-à-vis the politics surrounding AIDS, as a platform to remedy the historical tendency to marginalize the sick. While Shakespeare’s play can be seen as a dark satire culminating in a spread of corruption, the topos of disease reveals more about the theatre than it does the legend of Troy.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Divine Intervention and Disguise in Homer's Iliad Senior Thesis
    Divine Intervention and Disguise in Homer’s Iliad Senior Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Undergraduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Undergraduate Program in Classical Studies Professor Joel Christensen, Advisor In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts By Joana Jankulla May 2018 Copyright by Joana Jankulla 1 Copyright by Joana Jankulla © 2018 2 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Joel Christensen. Thank you, Professor Christensen for guiding me through this process, expressing confidence in me, and being available whenever I had any questions or concerns. I would not have been able to complete this work without you. Secondly, I would like to thank Professor Ann Olga Koloski-Ostrow and Professor Cheryl Walker for reading my thesis and providing me with feedback. The Classics Department at Brandeis University has been an instrumental part of my growth in my four years as an undergraduate, and I am eternally thankful to all the professors and staff members in the department. Thank you to my friends, specifically Erica Theroux, Sarah Jousset, Anna Craven, Rachel Goldstein, Taylor McKinnon and Georgie Contreras for providing me with a lot of emotional support this year. I hope you all know how grateful I am for you as friends and how much I have appreciated your love this year. Thank you to my mom for FaceTiming me every time I was stressed about completing my thesis and encouraging me every step of the way. Finally, thank you to Ian Leeds for dropping everything and coming to me each time I needed it.
    [Show full text]
  • Homer – the Iliad
    HOMER – THE ILIAD Homer is the author of both The Iliad and The Odyssey. He lived in Ionia – which is now modern day Turkey – between the years of 900-700 BC. Both of the above epics provided the framework for Greek education and thought. Homer was a blind bard, one who is a professional story teller, an oral historian. Epos or epic means story. An epic is a particular type of story; it involves one with a hero in the midst of a battle. The subject of the poem is the Trojan War which happened approximately in 1200 BC. This was 400 years before the poem was told by Homer. This story would have been read aloud by Homer and other bards that came after him. It was passed down generation to generation by memory. One can only imagine how valuable memory was during that time period – there were no hard drives or memory sticks. On a tangential note, one could see how this poem influenced a culture; to be educated was to memorize a particular set of poems or stories which could be cross-referenced with other people’s memory of those particular stories. The information would be public and not private. The Iliad is one of the greatest stories ever told – a war between two peoples; the Greeks from the West and the Trojans from the East. The purpose of this story is to praise Achilles. The two worlds are brought into focus; the world of the divine order and the human order. The hero of the story is to bring greater order and harmony between these two orders.
    [Show full text]
  • 01. Pelling, Homer and Question
    Histos Supplement ( ) – HOMER AND THE QUESTION WHY * Christopher Pelling Abstract : Historiography’s debt to Homer is immense, especially in exploring matters of cause and effect. The epics trace things back to beginnings, even if those are only ‘hinges’ in a still longer story; they use speech-exchanges not merely to characterise individuals but also to explore features of their society; the interaction of human and divine is complex, but the narrative focus characteristically rests more on the human level; allusiveness to narratives of earlier and later events also carries explanatory value. Epic and historiography alike also cast light on why readers find such aesthetic pleasure in stories of suffering, brutality, and death. Keywords: Homer, historiography, causation, explanation, intertextuality. t is no secret, and no surprise, that Greek historiography is steeped in Homer: how could it not be so? Epic was the great genre for the sweep Iof human experience, especially but not only in war; Homer was the narrator supreme. There have been many studies of the ways that individual historians exploit Homer to add depth to their work. I have contributed one myself on Herodotus, 1 Maria Fragoulaki writes in this volume on Thucydides, and others have covered writers down to and including the Second Sophistic. 2 Still, when completing a monograph on historical explanation in Herodotus,3 I was struck even more forcefully than before by how many of the characteristic interpretative techniques—not merely what they do, but how they do it—are already there in the Iliad and Odyssey. As the similarity of title shows, this paper is a companion piece to that book, though a full treatment would itself have swollen to monograph proportions, and the points have relevance to many other historical writers as well as Herodotus.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceiving and Knowing in the "Iliad" and "Odyssey" Author(S): J
    Perceiving and Knowing in the "Iliad" and "Odyssey" Author(s): J. H. Lesher Source: Phronesis, Vol. 26, No. 1 (1981), pp. 2-24 Published by: BRILL Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4182107 Accessed: 26/08/2009 11:25 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=bap. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. BRILL is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Phronesis. http://www.jstor.org Perceiving and Knowing in the Iliad and Odyssey J. H. LESHER The Homeric epics may contain a 'philosophyof man, or the gods, or a 'philosophicalworld view' of the dome of the heavens and the encircling rivers,but they lack those featureswhich usuallymark off the beginningof distinctlyphilosophical thought: a criticalattitude toward earlier views, the detection of inconsistencies,and the reductionof variousphenomena to a single unifyingprinciple.
    [Show full text]
  • Trojan Horse Or Troilus's Whore? Pandering Statecraft and Political Stagecraft in Troilus and Cressida
    Digital Commons @ Assumption University Philosophy Department Faculty Works Philosophy Department 2013 Trojan Horse or Troilus's Whore? Pandering Statecraft and Political Stagecraft in Troilus and Cressida Nalin Ranasinghe Assumption College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.assumption.edu/philosophy-faculty Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Ranasinghe, Nalin. "Trojan Horse or Troilus's Whore? Pandering Statecraft and Political Stagecraft in Troilus and Cressida." Shakespeare and the Body Politic. Edited by Bernard J. Dobski and Dustin Gish. Lexington Books, 2013, pp. 139-150. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy Department at Digital Commons @ Assumption University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Department Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Assumption University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Chapter Seven Trojan Horse or Troilus's Whore? Pandering Statecraft and Political Stagecraft in Troilus and Cressida N alin Ranasinghe Although Shakespeare's rancid play Troilus and Cressida is evidently not suited for all markets and tastes, it yet contains much dark wisdom to reward one willing to probe its sordid surface. This chapter will expose the workings of its hidden Prince-Ulysses-who silently performs deeds that undercut the exoteric meaning of his stately speech in praise of degree. By winging .'•. ;.· well-chosen words to be intercepted, overheard and misunderstood, as well as by staging spectacles that humble proud allies and poison insecure adver­ saries, Ulysses shows how well his creator had absorbed the teachings of Homer and Machiavelli on vanity and honor.
    [Show full text]
  • Narrative Control in Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde
    Bard College Bard Digital Commons Senior Projects Fall 2020 Bard Undergraduate Senior Projects Fall 2020 Narrative Control in Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde Liam Ainslie Mayo Bard College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_f2020 Part of the Literature in English, British Isles Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License Recommended Citation Mayo, Liam Ainslie, "Narrative Control in Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde" (2020). Senior Projects Fall 2020. 11. https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_f2020/11 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Bard Undergraduate Senior Projects at Bard Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Projects Fall 2020 by an authorized administrator of Bard Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Narrative Control in Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde Senior Project Submitted to The Division of Languages and Literature of Bard College by Liam Mayo Annandale-on-Hudson, New York December 2020 2 Acknowledgements To Professor Marisa Libbon, for being a constant presence throughout my time at Bard, always there with support, encouragement, and incredibly sage literary advice. I can’t thank you enough for everything you’ve taught me about Middle English specifically and scholarship more generally - this project would not have been possible without you. To Professor Adhaar Noor Desai, for teaching me to think in new ways about the construction of characters and the social implications of literature. This project would not be nearly what it is without your insight.
    [Show full text]
  • Criseyde, Consent, and the #Metoo Reader
    Volume 02 |Issue 01 Spring 2021 Criseyde, Consent, and the #MeToo Reader Sarah Powrie https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2315-8604 St. Thomas More College at the University of Saskatchewan, Canada Powrie. 2021. Criseyde, Consent, and the #MeToo Reader. New Chaucer Studies: Pedagogy and Profession 2.1: 18-33. https://escholarship.org/uc/ncs_pedagogyandprofession/| ISSN: 2766-1768. © 2021 by the author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 license. New Chaucer Studies: Pedagogy and Profession is an open access, bi-annual journal sponsored by the New Chaucer Society and published in eScholarship by the California Digital Library. | https://escholarship.org/uc/ncs_pedagogyandprofession| ISSN: 2766-1768. The editorial staff of New Chaucer Studies: Pedagogy and Profession works hard to ensure that contributions are accurate and follow professional ethical guidelines. However, the views and opinions expressed in each contribution belong exclusively to the author(s). The publisher and the editors do not endorse or accept responsibility for them. See https://escholarship.org/uc/ncs_pedagogyandprofession/policies for more information. Powrie: Criseyde and the #MeToo Reader Criseyde, Consent, and the #MeToo Reader Sarah Powrie https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2315-8604 St. Thomas More College at the University of Saskatchewan, Canada Abstract Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde features prankish sexual humour wrapped into a romantic comedy love- plot, in which sexual misconduct is coded as harmless fun. Generations of readers have interpreted book three’s consummation scene as a delightfully humorous, entertaining escapade. But in order for the episode to be interpreted as comedic, the reader must be willing to accept certain premises about gender norms and sexual violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Pandarus Quotes Ovid in Geoffrey Chaucer's Book
    SYMBOLAE PHILOLOGORUM POSNANIENSIUM GRAECAE ET LATINAE XXIX/2 • 2019 pp. 71–83. ISSN 0302–7384 DOI: 10.14746/sppgl.2020.XXIX.2.5 ANTONI BOBROWSKI Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie ORCID: 0000-0003-0890-7080 e-mail: [email protected] PANDARUS QUOTES OVID IN GEOFFREY CHAUCER’S BOOK ONE OF TROILUS AND CRISEYDE ABSTRACT. Bobrowski, Antoni, Pandarus Quotes Ovid in Geoffrey Chaucer’s Book One of Troilus and Criseyde (Pandarus cytuje Owidiusza w pierwszej księdze „Troilusa i Criseydy” Geoffreya Chaucera). The medieval epic poem Troilus and Criseyde by Chaucer describes the history of unhappy love with the Trojan War in the background. The story is constructed in the convention of courtly love, and the author draws abundantly from a range of plot motifs preserved in the ancient literary tradition. The article discusses the way of intertextual use of Ovid’s Heroides 5 in the course of events told in Book One of the poem. Keywords: Ovid; Heroides; Geoffrey Chaucer; Troilus; Troy. The name of Geoffrey Chaucer (ca. 1343–1400), who is regarded as the father of English literature written in the vernacular,1 is associated, above all, with Canterbury Tales, his most important and best-known literary achievement. It has been repeatedly noted, however, that in Chaucer’s abundant literary legacy it is not Canterbury Tales but another work that is considered to be completed and refined in terms of artistic expression,2 namely, the extensive, composed in five books, and written in rhyme royal epic poem Troilus and Criseyde, which is a fictional transformation of a story derived from the narrative complex of ancient Trojan stories.
    [Show full text]
  • Mythological Lovers in Chaucer's <I>Troilus and Criseyde</I>
    Quidditas Volume 12 Article 3 1991 Mythological Lovers in Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde Katherine Heinrichs University of Tennessee Chattanooga Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Renaissance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Heinrichs, Katherine (1991) "Mythological Lovers in Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde," Quidditas: Vol. 12 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra/vol12/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Quidditas by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. ]RMMRA 12 (1991) Mythological Lovers in Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde by Katherine Heinrichs University of Tennessee Chattanooga CHAUCER's Troilus and Criseyde is often criticized by modern scholars for the abruptness of its epilogue rejecting earthly love. Paull Baum objects that the moral of the epilogue is not, in fact, the moral of the tale and suggests chat Chaucer might better have concluded in the manner of the stilnovisti, with Criseyde as a transfigured "gloriosa donna." 1 ]. S. P. Tatlock protests that "the feeling of the Epilog is in no way foreshadowed at the beginning or elsewhere; it does not illumine or modify; it contradicts. The heartfelt worldly tale is interpreted in an unworldly sense." 2 He is joined in that opinion by Elizabeth Salter, Dieter Mehl, E.T. Donaldson, and others, including Aldous Huxley, who refers to the ''hurried and boggled conclusion'' of the Trozlus.
    [Show full text]
  • Socrates' Poetic Transformation of Odysseus
    Socrates' Poetic Transformation of Odysseus Nicholas Janszen, Felician College The traditional stories that we are told in our formative years inform our understanding of justice. In Books II and III of The Republic, Socrates presents a system of poetic education for the fictional guardians of the city in speech by juxtaposing what has been said by poets such as Homer with what should be said to young men who would become good citizens. Through the process of comparing what has been said to what should be said, Socrates establishes for his interlocutors a fundamentally new teaching on justice and citizenship. Socrates interprets Homer such that listeners already familiar with Homer might reexamine their understanding of Greek myths, and thereby come to accept rule founded in reason as preferable to rule founded in force or deceit. Parents, priests, and teachers tell us what is right and wrong. Yet upon what do we draw when it is time to make our own independent decisions about right and wrong, justice and injustice? The more religious will turn to holy writ for guidance, while those who have rejected works such as the Bible, Torah, and Koran may draw upon moral stories they were told in the past. Or, having discounted any idea of divine reward or punishment as children’s stories, they may turn to rational inquiry and try to discern the consequences of their actions. Whether they reject or accept the stories they were told as a fair depiction of the consequences of human action, those stories provide them with their first conceptions of justice.
    [Show full text]
  • TROILUS CRESSIDA How Now, Young Man! Mean'st Thou to Fight To-Day? and Whither Go They? ANDROMACHE ALEXANDRA Cassandra, Call My Father to Persuade
    100 1 Troilus and Cressida ABRIDGED Written by William Shakespeare Edited by Dan Schuster 2 99 98 3 TROILUS Hence, broker-lackey! Ignomy and shame Pursue thy life, and live aye with thy name! Exit TROILUS; THERSITES enters and goes back to pillaging the two bodies PANDARUS A goodly medicine for my aching bones! O world! William Shakespeare’s World! World! Thus is the poor agent despised! O traitors and bawds, how earnestly are you set a-work, and how ill requited! Why should our endeavour be so loved and the performance so loathed? What verse for it? What instance for it? Let me see: ‘Full merrily the humble-bee doth sing, Till he hath lost his honey and his sting; And being once subdued in armed tail, Sweet honey and sweet notes together fail.’ Good traders in the flesh, set this in your painted cloths. As many as be here of pander's hall, Your eyes, half out, weep out at Pandar's fall; Troilus Or if you cannot weep, yet give some groans, Though not for me, yet for your aching bones. and Brethren and sisters of the hold-door trade, Some two months hence my will shall here be made: It should be now, but that my fear is this, Some galled goose of Winchester would hiss: Cressida Till then I'll sweat and seek about for eases, And at that time bequeathe you my diseases. Exit PANDARUS and THERSITES together Edited by Dan Schuster The Wichita Shakespeare Co. 4 97 ACHILLES Troilus and Cressida The dragon wing of night o'erspreads the earth, Dramatis Personae And, stickler-like, the armies separates.
    [Show full text]