California Western Law Review Volume 38 Number 1 Article 6 2001 Voluntary Labeling of Bioengineered Food: Cognitive Dissonance in the Law, Science, and Public Policy Frank J. Miskiel Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwlr Recommended Citation Miskiel, Frank J. (2001) "Voluntary Labeling of Bioengineered Food: Cognitive Dissonance in the Law, Science, and Public Policy," California Western Law Review: Vol. 38 : No. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwlr/vol38/iss1/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by CWSL Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in California Western Law Review by an authorized editor of CWSL Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Miskiel: Voluntary Labeling of Bioengineered Food: Cognitive Dissonance in VOLUNTARY LABELING OF BIOENGINEERED FOOD: COGNITIVE DISSONANCE IN THE LAW, SCIENCE, AND PUBLIC POLICY Frank J. Miskiel It has become commonplace-the norm-for government regulation to seem completely detached from comnmon sense. So much so that regulation typically imposes enormous costs-in terms of money, time, and inconven- ience-on American consumers, businesses, and employees, with very lit- tle benefit, if any.' I. INTRODUCTION "Non-GMO." This is a label that has recently begun to appear on many foods in the United States. Now the "non-GMO" segment of the food indus- try is vying with the "organic" food industry's growing popularity.2 "GMO" is an acronym for "genetically modified organisms" and has been embraced as shorthand for all bioengineered foods.' The "non-GMO" label itself has J.D.