Shared Genetic Origin of Asthma, Hay Fever and Eczema Elucidates

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shared Genetic Origin of Asthma, Hay Fever and Eczema Elucidates LETTERS Shared genetic origin of asthma, hay fever and eczema elucidates allergic disease biology Manuel A Ferreira1,38 , Judith M Vonk2,38, Hansjörg Baurecht3,38, Ingo Marenholz4,5,38, Chao Tian6,38, Joshua D Hoffman7,38, Quinta Helmer8,38, Annika Tillander9,38, Vilhelmina Ullemar9,38, Jenny van Dongen8,38, Yi Lu9,38, Franz Rüschendorf4,38 , Jorge Esparza-Gordillo4,5,37, Chris W Medway10, Edward Mountjoy10 , Kimberley Burrows10, Oliver Hummel4, Sarah Grosche4,5, Ben M Brumpton10–12, John S Witte13, Jouke-Jan Hottenga8, Gonneke Willemsen8, Jie Zheng10, Elke Rodríguez3, Melanie Hotze3, Andre Franke14 , Joana A Revez1, Jonathan Beesley1, Melanie C Matheson15, Shyamali C Dharmage15, Lisa M Bain1, Lars G Fritsche11, Maiken E Gabrielsen11, Brunilda Balliu16, 23andMe Research Team17, AAGC collaborators17, BIOS consortium17, LifeLines Cohort Study17, Jonas B Nielsen18,19 , Wei Zhou19, Kristian Hveem11,20, Arnulf Langhammer20, Oddgeir L Holmen11, Mari Løset11,21, Gonçalo R Abecasis11,22, Cristen J Willer11,18,19,22 , Andreas Arnold23, Georg Homuth24, Carsten O Schmidt25, Philip J Thompson26, Nicholas G Martin1, David L Duffy1, Natalija Novak27, Holger Schulz28,29, Stefan Karrasch28–30, Christian Gieger31, Konstantin Strauch32, Ronald B Melles33, David A Hinds6, Norbert Hübner4,39, Stephan Weidinger3,39, Patrik K E Magnusson9,39, Rick Jansen34,39 , Eric Jorgenson33,39 , Young-Ae Lee4,5,39, Dorret I Boomsma8,39, Catarina Almqvist9,35,39 , Robert Karlsson9,39 , Gerard H Koppelman36,39 & Lavinia Paternoster10,39 Asthma, hay fever (or allergic rhinitis) and eczema (or atopic having suffered from asthma and/or hay fever and/or eczema with dermatitis) often coexist in the same individuals1, partly 180,709 controls who reported not suffering from any of these diseases because of a shared genetic origin2–4. To identify shared risk (Supplementary Table 2), all of European ancestry. Meta-analysis variants, we performed a genome-wide association study of results from the 13 contributing studies (Supplementary Fig. 2) (GWAS; n = 360,838) of a broad allergic disease phenotype identified 99 genomic regions (loci) located >1 Mb apart containing at that considers the presence of any one of these three diseases. least one genetic variant associated with allergic disease at a genome- We identified 136 independent risk variants (P < 3 × 10−8), wide significance threshold of 3 × 10−8 (Fig. 1 and Supplementary including 73 not previously reported, which implicate 132 Table 3). On the basis of approximate conditional analysis5, 136 nearby genes in allergic disease pathophysiology. Disease- Nature America, Inc., part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved. genetic variants in these 99 loci had a statistically independent asso- 7 specific effects were detected for only six variants, confirming ciation with disease risk (Supplementary Table 4). Henceforth, we that most represent shared risk factors. Tissue-specific refer to these as ‘sentinel risk variants’, which either represent or are 201 © heritability and biological process enrichment analyses suggest in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with a causal functional variant. These that shared risk variants influence lymphocyte-mediated included 86 (in 50 loci) located <1 Mb from risk variants reported immunity. Six target genes provide an opportunity for drug in previous GWAS of allergic disease (Supplementary Table 5). Of repositioning, while for 36 genes CpG methylation was found note, 23 of these 86 sentinel variants were in low LD (r2 < 0.05) with to influence transcription independently of genetic effects. the previously reported risk variants, indicating that they represent Asthma, hay fever and eczema partly coexist because they new associations in these loci. The remaining 50 sentinel variants share many genetic risk variants that dysregulate the expression (in 49 loci) were located >1 Mb from previously reported associa- of immune-related genes. tions (Supplementary Table 6), of which 17 were in low LD with nearby variants reported for other diseases or traits (Supplementary The analytical approach used in our study is summarized in Table 7). Eighteen loci had multiple independent association sig- Supplementary Figure 1. We tested for association with allergic nals (Supplementary Table 3). Altogether, we identified 73 (50 + disease 8,307,659 genetic variants that passed quality control filters 23) genetic associations with allergic disease that are new, a sub- (Supplementary Table 1), comparing 180,129 cases who reported stantial increment over the 89 associations reported previously (Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table 8). A full list of affiliations appears at the end of the paper. As expected from a study design that maximized power to identify 6 Received 13 June; accepted 6 October; published online 30 October 2017; shared risk variants , we found that 130 of the 136 sentinel variants doi:10.1038/ng.3985 had similar allele frequencies in case-only association analyses that NATURE GEnETICS ADVANCE ONLINE PUBLICATION LETTERS compared three non-overlapping groups of adults: those who reported three individual diseases. The six variants with evidence for stronger suffering from asthma only (n = 12,268), hay fever only (n = 33,305) effects in one allergic disease when compared to the other two were or eczema only (n = 6,276) (Supplementary Table 9). There was thus located in five known allergy risk loci (for example, FLG and GSDMB; no evidence that these 130 variants have differential effects on the Fig. 2). On the other hand, many sentinel variants (26, or 19%) were 50 known loci 49 new loci STMN3 1 1 1 11 C22orf46, PMM1, NHP2L1, CCDC134, PHF5A, CSDC2,MEI1 [ZNF217] 0 1 X 1 0 [SIK1] [NFATC2] 0 1 1 0 [RUNX1] 22 GNGT2 1 1 21 1 0 SLC7A10-[]-CEBPA ORMDL3, CCR7, RP11-94L15.2, ZPBP2, GSDMB 7 4 20 1 1 PIGN CLEC16A-[]-RMI2, RMI2-[]--LITAF 0 2 19 1 1 DYNAP AAGAB 1 1 18 1 2 MAP3K14-AS1, SPATA32 RP11-554D20.1 1 1 1 0 [STAT5B] 17 [RAD51B] 0 1 1 1 ALOX15 FOXA1-[]--TTC6 0 1 16 1 2 IQGAP1, CRTC3 NFKBIA, PPP2R3C, KIAA0391, FAM177A1 4 1 1 2 RTF1, ITPKA 15 PITPNM2, OGFOD2, ARL6IP4, ABCB9, SBNO1 10 1 1 0 RCOR1-[]-TRAF3 NAB2, STAT6, SUOX, RPS26, PA2G4, MYL6B, ERBB3 8 2 14 1 0 JDP2-[]-BATF KIRREL3-AS3---[]--ETS1 0 1 1 0 PIBF1-[]-KLF5 DDX6-[]-CXCR5 0 1 13 1 0 [FOXO1] WNT11--[]-LRRC32 0 3 1 1 SPPL3 OVOL1, SNX32, RP11-770G2.5, EFEMP2 4 1 12 1 1 SH2B3 ACTR1A, TMEM180, ARL3 3 1 1 1 AQP5 [ZNF365] 0 1 11 1 1 HDAC7 GATA3---[]---SFTA1P, GATA3--[]SFTA1P 0 6 1 2 PPP2R1B, SIK2 IL2RA 1 2 10 1 0 SESN3--[]-FAM76B C9orf114-[]-LRRC8A 0 1 1 1 FBXW2 ERMP1 1 3 1 1 GSAP [MYC] 0 1 9 1 0 C7orf72-[]-IKZF1 MIR5708--[]--ZBTB10 0 1 1 1 JAZF1 ITGB8--[]-ABCB5, [ITGB8] 0 2 8 1 0 RNASET2-[]-MIR3939 [BACH2] 0 1 1 0 [ARID1B] HLA-C, MCCD1P1, HLA-DQA1, GPANK1, PRRC2A 5 7 1 1 TNFAIP3 HDAC3, NDFIP1 2 2 7 1 0 [PTPRK] SLC22A4, SLC22A5, C5orf56, IL13 4 3 1 0 [ATG5] CAMK4, SLC25A46, TSLP, CTC-551A13.2, WDR36 5 4 6 1 2 RGS14, RAB24 PTGER4 1 1 1 0 MIR3142-[]-MIR146A IL7R 1 1 1 0 [TNFAIP8] FAM105A 1 1 5 1 0 [MANBA] KIAA1109 1 2 1 0 STX18--[]-MSX1 TLR1 1 1 FBXO45-[]-CEP19 0 1 1 1 RASA2 4 RP11-132N15.2, RP11-132N15.1, BCL6 3 4 1 4 SLC15A2, EAF2, IQCB1, DC86 [GLB1] 0 1 1 1 SENP7 [D2HGDH] 0 1 1 0 LINC00870--[]-RYBP Nature America, Inc., part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved. 3 1 1 INPP5D 7 BOLL, RFTN2, MARS2, PLCL1 4 1 MFSD9, IL18R1, IL1RL1, IL18RAP 4 2 1 0 CCL20-[]-DAW1 201 [LINC00299] 0 1 1 1 ARHGAP15 © TNFSF18--[]-TNFSF4,FASLG-[]--TNFSF18 0 2 1 0 [IL1B] 2 CD247 1 1 2 0 BCL2L11--[]--ANAPC1 USF1, F11R, PPOX, ADAMTS4, B4GALT3, FCER1G 7 1 1 0 [LOC339807] IL6R 1 1 1 0 [ITPKB] THEM4, FLG 2 3 1 0 SFPQ-[]-ZMYM4 1 RPRD2, C1orf54, TARS2 3 1 1 1 RUNX3 RP5-1115A15.1, RERE 2 1 1 1 TNFRSF14 s 21 18 15 12 9 6 3 0 s –log10 (P value) target genes target genes Target genes Target genes n n sentinel variant sentinel variant n n Figure 1 Loci containing genetic risk variants independently associated with the risk of allergic disease at P < 3 × 10−8. The 136 sentinel risk variants were located in 50 previously reported (86 variants) and 49 new (50 variants) risk loci. The numbers of plausible target genes of sentinel risk variants identified for each locus are shown, with target gene names listed in blue font. For loci with many target genes, only a selection is listed. When no target gene was identified (black font), brackets are used to indicate the location of the sentinel risk variant relative to the nearest gene(s). Specifically, when the risk variant was intergenic (indicated by “gene1-[]-gene2”), the two closest genes (upstream and downstream) are shown; the distance to each gene is proportional to the number of dashes shown. Otherwise, when the risk variant was located within a gene, the respective gene name is shown in brackets (“[gene]”). The red vertical line in the Manhattan plot shows the genome-wide significance threshold used (P = 3 × 10−8). aDVANCE ONLINE PUBLICATION NATURE GEnETICS LETTERS rs61816761[A] (chr. 1: 152 Mb) rs12123821[T] (chr. 1: 152 Mb) rs12470864[A] (chr. 2: 103 Mb) also associated with the age at which symptoms of any allergic dis- [FLG] RPTN-[]-HRNR IL1RL2-[]-IL18R1 ease first developed (n = 35,972; Supplementary Table 10), with the Asthma Asthma Asthma allele associated with a higher disease risk always being associated with earlier age of onset (Supplementary Fig. 4). For 18 of these 1.03 1.05 1.07 1.01 26 variants, the effect on age of onset was not significantly different 1.26 1.18 between individual diseases (Supplementary Table 10), suggesting 1.32 1.16 Eczema Hay fever Eczema Hay fever Eczema 1.07Hay fever that these variants influence the age at which symptoms first develop for all three diseases.
Recommended publications
  • Identification of Transcriptomic Differences Between Lower
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Identification of Transcriptomic Differences between Lower Extremities Arterial Disease, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Chronic Venous Disease in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Specimens Daniel P. Zalewski 1,*,† , Karol P. Ruszel 2,†, Andrzej St˛epniewski 3, Dariusz Gałkowski 4, Jacek Bogucki 5 , Przemysław Kołodziej 6 , Jolanta Szyma ´nska 7 , Bartosz J. Płachno 8 , Tomasz Zubilewicz 9 , Marcin Feldo 9,‡ , Janusz Kocki 2,‡ and Anna Bogucka-Kocka 1,‡ 1 Chair and Department of Biology and Genetics, Medical University of Lublin, 4a Chod´zkiSt., 20-093 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] 2 Chair of Medical Genetics, Department of Clinical Genetics, Medical University of Lublin, 11 Radziwiłłowska St., 20-080 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] (K.P.R.); [email protected] (J.K.) 3 Ecotech Complex Analytical and Programme Centre for Advanced Environmentally Friendly Technologies, University of Marie Curie-Skłodowska, 39 Gł˛ebokaSt., 20-612 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] 4 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, One Robert Wood Johnson Place, New Brunswick, NJ 08903-0019, USA; [email protected] 5 Chair and Department of Organic Chemistry, Medical University of Lublin, 4a Chod´zkiSt., Citation: Zalewski, D.P.; Ruszel, K.P.; 20-093 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] St˛epniewski,A.; Gałkowski, D.; 6 Laboratory of Diagnostic Parasitology, Chair and Department of Biology and Genetics, Medical University of Bogucki, J.; Kołodziej, P.; Szyma´nska, Lublin, 4a Chod´zkiSt., 20-093 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] J.; Płachno, B.J.; Zubilewicz, T.; Feldo, 7 Department of Integrated Paediatric Dentistry, Chair of Integrated Dentistry, Medical University of Lublin, M.; et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Compartment-Specific Non-HLA Targets After Renal Transplantation by Integrating Transcriptome and ‘‘Antibodyome’’ Measures
    Identifying compartment-specific non-HLA targets after renal transplantation by integrating transcriptome and ‘‘antibodyome’’ measures Li Lia, Persis Wadiab, Rong Chenc, Neeraja Kambhamd, Maarten Naesensa, Tara K. Sigdela, David B. Miklosb, Minnie M. Sarwala,1, and Atul J. Buttea,c,1 aDepartment of Pediatrics, Blood and Marrow Transplantation Division, Departments of bMedicine and dPathology, and cCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94304 Communicated by Mark M. Davis, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, January 27, 2009 (received for review May 22, 2008) We have conducted an integrative genomics analysis of serological antigens, may be associated with chronic renal allograft histological responses to non-HLA targets after renal transplantation, with the injury (11). Antibodies against Agrin, the most abundant heparin aim of identifying the tissue specificity and types of immunogenic sulfate proteoglycan present in the glomerular basal membrane, non-HLA antigenic targets after transplantation. Posttransplant have been implicated in transplant glomerulopathy (12), and ago- antibody responses were measured by paired comparative analysis nistic antibodies against the Angiotensin II type 1 receptor of pretransplant and posttransplant serum samples from 18 pedi- (AT1R-AA) were described in renal allograft recipients with severe atric renal transplant recipients, measured against 5,056 unique vascular types of rejection and malignant hypertension (13). protein targets on the ProtoArray platform. The specificity of It is expected that there are many more unidentified non-HLA antibody responses were measured against gene expression levels non-ABO immune antigens that might evoke specific antibody specific to the kidney, and 2 other randomly selected organs (heart responses after renal transplantation (8).
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Wide Identification of Genes Regulating DNA Methylation Using Genetic Anchors for Causal Inference
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/823807; this version posted October 30, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Genome-wide identification of genes regulating DNA methylation using genetic anchors for causal inference Paul J. Hop1,2, René Luijk1, Lucia Daxinger3, Maarten van Iterson1, Koen F. Dekkers1, Rick Jansen4, BIOS Consortium5, Joyce B.J. van Meurs6, Peter A.C. ’t Hoen 7, M. Arfan Ikram8, Marleen M.J. van Greevenbroek9,10, Dorret I. Boomsma11, P. Eline Slagboom1, Jan H. Veldink2, Erik W. van Zwet12, Bastiaan T. Heijmans1* 1 Molecular Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands 2 Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CG, Netherlands 3 Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands 4 Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands 5 Biobank-based Integrated Omics Study Consortium. For a complete list of authors, see the acknowledgements. 6 Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 7 Centre for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Substitution Mapping in Dahl Rats Identifies Two Distinct Blood
    Genetics: Published Articles Ahead of Print, published on October 8, 2006 as 10.1534/genetics.106.061747 1 Substitution Mapping in Dahl Rats Identifies Two Distinct Blood Pressure Quantitative Trait Loci within 1.12 Mb and 1.25 Mb Intervals on Chromosome 3. Soon Jin Lee, Jun Liu, Allison M. Westcott, Joshua A. Vieth, Sarah J. DeRaedt, Siming Yang, Bina Joe, and George T. Cicila Department of Physiology, Pharmacology, Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Sciences University of Toledo College of Medicine, 3035 Arlington Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43614 2 Running Head: Congenic Substrains and Blood Pressure Correspondence to: George T. Cicila, Ph.D. University of Toledo College of Medicine Department of Physiology, Pharmacology, Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Sciences 3035 Arlington Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43614 Phone: (419) 383-4171 Fax: (419) 383-6168 e-mail: [email protected] Key Words: genetic hypertension, inbred rat strains, Dahl salt-sensitive rat, Dahl salt- resistant rat, salt-sensitivity 3 Abstract Substitution mapping was used to refine the localization of blood pressure (BP) quantitative trait loci (QTLs) within the congenic region of S.R-Edn3 rats located at the q-terminus of rat chromosome 3 (RNO3). An F2(SxS.R-Edn3) population (n=173) was screened to identify rats having crossovers within the congenic region of RNO3 and six congenic substrains were developed that carry shorter segments of R-rat derived RNO3. Five of the six congenic substrains had significantly lower BP compared to the parental S rat. The lack of BP lowering effect demonstrated by the S.R(ET3x5) substrain and the BP lowering effect retained by S.R(ET3x2) substrain, together define the RNO3 BP QTL-containing region as approximately 4.64 Mb.
    [Show full text]
  • A Peripheral Blood Gene Expression Signature to Diagnose Subclinical Acute Rejection
    CLINICAL RESEARCH www.jasn.org A Peripheral Blood Gene Expression Signature to Diagnose Subclinical Acute Rejection Weijia Zhang,1 Zhengzi Yi,1 Karen L. Keung,2 Huimin Shang,3 Chengguo Wei,1 Paolo Cravedi,1 Zeguo Sun,1 Caixia Xi,1 Christopher Woytovich,1 Samira Farouk,1 Weiqing Huang,1 Khadija Banu,1 Lorenzo Gallon,4 Ciara N. Magee,5 Nader Najafian,5 Milagros Samaniego,6 Arjang Djamali ,7 Stephen I. Alexander,2 Ivy A. Rosales,8 Rex Neal Smith,8 Jenny Xiang,3 Evelyne Lerut,9 Dirk Kuypers,10,11 Maarten Naesens ,10,11 Philip J. O’Connell,2 Robert Colvin,8 Madhav C. Menon,1 and Barbara Murphy1 Due to the number of contributing authors, the affiliations are listed at the end of this article. ABSTRACT Background In kidney transplant recipients, surveillance biopsies can reveal, despite stable graft function, histologic features of acute rejection and borderline changes that are associated with undesirable graft outcomes. Noninvasive biomarkers of subclinical acute rejection are needed to avoid the risks and costs associated with repeated biopsies. Methods We examined subclinical histologic and functional changes in kidney transplant recipients from the prospective Genomics of Chronic Allograft Rejection (GoCAR) study who underwent surveillance biopsies over 2 years, identifying those with subclinical or borderline acute cellular rejection (ACR) at 3 months (ACR-3) post-transplant. We performed RNA sequencing on whole blood collected from 88 indi- viduals at the time of 3-month surveillance biopsy to identify transcripts associated with ACR-3, developed a novel sequencing-based targeted expression assay, and validated this gene signature in an independent cohort.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2012/174282 A2 20 December 2012 (20.12.2012) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2012/174282 A2 20 December 2012 (20.12.2012) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: David [US/US]; 13539 N . 95th Way, Scottsdale, AZ C12Q 1/68 (2006.01) 85260 (US). (21) International Application Number: (74) Agent: AKHAVAN, Ramin; Caris Science, Inc., 6655 N . PCT/US20 12/0425 19 Macarthur Blvd., Irving, TX 75039 (US). (22) International Filing Date: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 14 June 2012 (14.06.2012) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, English (25) Filing Language: CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, Publication Language: English DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, KR, (30) Priority Data: KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, 61/497,895 16 June 201 1 (16.06.201 1) US MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, 61/499,138 20 June 201 1 (20.06.201 1) US OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SC, SD, 61/501,680 27 June 201 1 (27.06.201 1) u s SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, 61/506,019 8 July 201 1(08.07.201 1) u s TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancer Rnas: Transcriptional Regulators and Workmates of Namirnas in Myogenesis
    Odame et al. Cell Mol Biol Lett (2021) 26:4 https://doi.org/10.1186/s11658-021-00248-x Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters REVIEW Open Access Enhancer RNAs: transcriptional regulators and workmates of NamiRNAs in myogenesis Emmanuel Odame , Yuan Chen, Shuailong Zheng, Dinghui Dai, Bismark Kyei, Siyuan Zhan, Jiaxue Cao, Jiazhong Guo, Tao Zhong, Linjie Wang, Li Li* and Hongping Zhang* *Correspondence: [email protected]; zhp@sicau. Abstract edu.cn miRNAs are well known to be gene repressors. A newly identifed class of miRNAs Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration termed nuclear activating miRNAs (NamiRNAs), transcribed from miRNA loci that and Innovation Key exhibit enhancer features, promote gene expression via binding to the promoter and Laboratory of Sichuan enhancer marker regions of the target genes. Meanwhile, activated enhancers pro- Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, duce endogenous non-coding RNAs (named enhancer RNAs, eRNAs) to activate gene Sichuan Agricultural expression. During chromatin looping, transcribed eRNAs interact with NamiRNAs University, Chengdu 611130, through enhancer-promoter interaction to perform similar functions. Here, we review China the functional diferences and similarities between eRNAs and NamiRNAs in myogen- esis and disease. We also propose models demonstrating their mutual mechanism and function. We conclude that eRNAs are active molecules, transcriptional regulators, and partners of NamiRNAs, rather than mere RNAs produced during enhancer activation. Keywords: Enhancer RNA, NamiRNAs, MicroRNA, Myogenesis, Transcriptional regulator Introduction Te identifcation of lin-4 miRNA in Caenorhabditis elegans in 1993 [1] triggered research to discover and understand small microRNAs’ (miRNAs) mechanisms. Recently, some miRNAs are reported to activate target genes during transcription via base pairing to the 3ʹ or 5ʹ untranslated regions (3ʹ or 5ʹ UTRs), the promoter [2], and the enhancer regions [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Sex-Specific Transcriptome Differences in Human Adipose
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Sex-Specific Transcriptome Differences in Human Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells 1, 2, 3 1,3 Eva Bianconi y, Raffaella Casadei y , Flavia Frabetti , Carlo Ventura , Federica Facchin 1,3,* and Silvia Canaider 1,3 1 National Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Stem Cell Bioengineering of the National Institute of Biostructures and Biosystems (NIBB)—Eldor Lab, at the Innovation Accelerator, CNR, Via Piero Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy; [email protected] (E.B.); [email protected] (C.V.); [email protected] (S.C.) 2 Department for Life Quality Studies (QuVi), University of Bologna, Corso D’Augusto 237, 47921 Rimini, Italy; [email protected] 3 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy; fl[email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-051-2094114 These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 1 July 2020; Accepted: 6 August 2020; Published: 8 August 2020 Abstract: In humans, sexual dimorphism can manifest in many ways and it is widely studied in several knowledge fields. It is increasing the evidence that also cells differ according to sex, a correlation still little studied and poorly considered when cells are used in scientific research. Specifically, our interest is on the sex-related dimorphism on the human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) transcriptome. A systematic meta-analysis of hMSC microarrays was performed by using the Transcriptome Mapper (TRAM) software. This bioinformatic tool was used to integrate and normalize datasets from multiple sources and allowed us to highlight chromosomal segments and genes differently expressed in hMSCs derived from adipose tissue (hADSCs) of male and female donors.
    [Show full text]
  • Triangulating Molecular Evidence to Prioritise Candidate Causal Genes at Established Atopic Dermatitis Loci
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.30.20240838; this version posted November 30, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license . Triangulating molecular evidence to prioritise candidate causal genes at established atopic dermatitis loci Maria K Sobczyk1, Tom G Richardson1, Verena Zuber2,3, Josine L Min1, eQTLGen Consortium4, BIOS Consortium5, GoDMC, Tom R Gaunt1, Lavinia Paternoster1* 1) MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK 2) Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK 3) MRC Biostatistics Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK 4) Members of the eQTLGen Consortium are listed in: Supplementary_Consortium_members.docx 5) Members of the BIOS Consortium are listed in: Supplementary_Consortium_members.docx Abstract Background: Genome-wide association studies for atopic dermatitis (AD, eczema) have identified 25 reproducible loci associated in populations of European descent. We attempt to prioritise candidate causal genes at these loci using a multifaceted bioinformatic approach and extensive molecular resources compiled into a novel pipeline: ADGAPP (Atopic Dermatitis GWAS Annotation & Prioritisation Pipeline). Methods: We identified a comprehensive list of 103 accessible
    [Show full text]
  • The DNA Sequence and Comparative Analysis of Human Chromosome 20
    articles The DNA sequence and comparative analysis of human chromosome 20 P. Deloukas, L. H. Matthews, J. Ashurst, J. Burton, J. G. R. Gilbert, M. Jones, G. Stavrides, J. P. Almeida, A. K. Babbage, C. L. Bagguley, J. Bailey, K. F. Barlow, K. N. Bates, L. M. Beard, D. M. Beare, O. P. Beasley, C. P. Bird, S. E. Blakey, A. M. Bridgeman, A. J. Brown, D. Buck, W. Burrill, A. P. Butler, C. Carder, N. P. Carter, J. C. Chapman, M. Clamp, G. Clark, L. N. Clark, S. Y. Clark, C. M. Clee, S. Clegg, V. E. Cobley, R. E. Collier, R. Connor, N. R. Corby, A. Coulson, G. J. Coville, R. Deadman, P. Dhami, M. Dunn, A. G. Ellington, J. A. Frankland, A. Fraser, L. French, P. Garner, D. V. Grafham, C. Grif®ths, M. N. D. Grif®ths, R. Gwilliam, R. E. Hall, S. Hammond, J. L. Harley, P. D. Heath, S. Ho, J. L. Holden, P. J. Howden, E. Huckle, A. R. Hunt, S. E. Hunt, K. Jekosch, C. M. Johnson, D. Johnson, M. P. Kay, A. M. Kimberley, A. King, A. Knights, G. K. Laird, S. Lawlor, M. H. Lehvaslaiho, M. Leversha, C. Lloyd, D. M. Lloyd, J. D. Lovell, V. L. Marsh, S. L. Martin, L. J. McConnachie, K. McLay, A. A. McMurray, S. Milne, D. Mistry, M. J. F. Moore, J. C. Mullikin, T. Nickerson, K. Oliver, A. Parker, R. Patel, T. A. V. Pearce, A. I. Peck, B. J. C. T. Phillimore, S. R. Prathalingam, R. W. Plumb, H. Ramsay, C. M.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic and Genomics Laboratory Tools and Approaches
    Genetic and Genomics Laboratory Tools and Approaches Meredith Yeager, PhD Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics [email protected] DCEG Radiation Epidemiology and Dosimetry Course 2019 www.dceg.cancer.gov/RadEpiCourse (Recent) history of genetics 2 Sequencing of the Human Genome Science 291, 1304-1351 (2001) 3 The Human Genome – 2019 • ~3.3 billion bases (A, C, G, T) • ~20,000 protein-coding genes, many non-coding RNAs (~2% of the genome) • Annotation ongoing – the initial sequencing in 2001 is still being refined, assembled and annotated, even now – hg38 • Variation (polymorphism) present within humans – Population-specific – Cosmopolitan 4 Types of polymorphisms . Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) . Common SNPs are defined as > 5% in at least one population . Abundant in genome (~50 million and counting) ATGGAACGA(G/C)AGGATA(T/A)TACGCACTATGAAG(C/A)CGGTGAGAGG . Repeats of DNA (long, short, complex, simple), insertions/deletions . A small fraction of SNPs and other types of variation are very or slightly deleterious and may contribute by themselves or with other genetic or environmental factors to a phenotype or disease 5 Different mutation rates at the nucleotide level Mutation type Mutation rate (per generation) Transition on a CpG 1.6X10-7 Transversion on a CpG 4.4X10-8 Transition: purine to purine Transition out of CpG 1.2X10-8 Transversion: purine to pyrimidine Transversion out of CpG 5.5X10-9 Substitution (average) 2.3X10-8 A and G are purines Insertion/deletion (average) 2.3X10-9 C and T are pyrimidines Mutation rate (average) 2.4X10-8 . Size of haploid genome : 3.3X109 nucleotides .
    [Show full text]
  • Global Screening of Sentrin-Specific Protease Family Substrates in Sumoylation
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.25.964072; this version posted February 26, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Global Screening of Sentrin-Specific Protease Family Substrates in SUMOylation Yunzhi Wang, 1, 4 Xiaohui Wu,1, 4 Rui Ge,1, 4 Lei Song, 2 Kai Li, 2 Sha Tian,1 Lili Cai, 1 Mingwei Liu, 2 Wenhao Shi, 2Guoying Yu, 3 Bei Zhen, 2 Yi Wang, 2 Fuchu He, 1, 2, * Jun Qin, 1, 2, * Chen Ding1, 2, * 1State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetics and Development, School of Life Sciences, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200432, China 2State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China 3State Key Laboratory of Cell Differentiation and Regulation, College of Life Science, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, Henan 453007 4Co-first author *Correspondence: [email protected] (C.D.); [email protected] (J.Q.); [email protected] (F.H.); Key Words 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.25.964072; this version posted February 26, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Posttranslational modification; SUMO; Sentrin/SUMO-specific proteases; Mass Spectrometry; Innate Immunity Abstract Post-translational modification of proteins by the addition of small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) is a dynamic process, in which deSUMOylation is carried out by members of the Sentrin/SUMO-specific protease (SENP) family.
    [Show full text]