DOCSLIB.ORG

The Case to Connect Inland Rail from Toowoomba to Gladstone Key National Infrastructure: Connecting Inland Rail to Gladstone Port

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Case to Connect Inland Rail from Toowoomba to Gladstone Key National Infrastructure: Connecting Inland Rail to Gladstone Port T2G: MAKING THE RIGHT CONNECTION THE CASE TO CONNECT INLAND RAIL FROM TOOWOOMBA TO GLADSTONE KEY NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE: CONNECTING INLAND RAIL TO GLADSTONE PORT Quicker freight times to Asia Enable $15.6B resource investment in regional Queensland Bring forward Nathan Dam and pipeline project Lowering supply chain costs Deeper port enables larger container ships Up to 18,300 extra jobs in regional Queensland Develop a 4th major container port for eastern Australia Reduce the cost of Up to 3 years quicker delivery of the Potential to remove coal trains from Inland Rail by $4.8 B Inland Rail vision Brisbane suburban network 2 Toowoomba CONTENTS Gladstone Inland Rail ABOUT INLAND RAIL 4 THE CHALLENGE GETTING TO THE PORT OF BRISBANE 6 CONNECTING TO GLADSTONE PORT IS A BETTER OPTION 8 INLAND RAIL DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS FROM TOOWOOMBA 10 GLADSTONE PORT OVERVIEW 11 SEA FREIGHT PRODUCTIVITY 12 UNLOCKING NEW RESOURCE DEVELOPMENTS 14 BUILDING DEMAND FOR NEW WATER INFRASTRUCTURE 15 ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT - CONSTRUCTION 16 ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT - OPERATIONS 17 ASK OF THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 18 3 ABOUT INLAND RAIL Australia’s freight task is growing, driven by a forecast increase in containerized trade. Demand Projections for Inland Rail (Mtpa) 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 TEU volumes (million TEUs) 0 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 2065 2070 2075 SEQ-Intercapital Import/Export Note: ARTC Demand projections highlight freight from Melbourne to Brisbane, Brisbane to Adelaide, and Brisbane to Perth. Source: ARTC (2015). ARTC 2015 Inland Rail Programme Business Case. 4 Toowoomba ABOUT INLAND RAIL Gladstone Inland Rail Gladstone Inland Rail is a visionary Gateway Mwy Port of project, aimed at future Brisbane 38 km from Acacia Ridge Brisbane proofing Australia’s economy Airport to Port of Brisbane as the freight task grows. Currently the project spans Brisbane Fisherman Islands Line Toowoomba Brisbane 1,700km from Melbourne CBD to Brisbane, but does not connect to a port. Cleveland Line Moree The lack of port connectivity limits the project benefits Gateway Mwy Acacia for import-export freight Ridge and will generate extreme Ipswich Line Terminal e Pacific Mwy Gold Coast Lin congestion between the ALIGNMENT KEY Existing rail network rail terminus and ports, Highway Logan Mwy e Parkes particularly in Brisbane. Brisbane - Sydney Lin Sydney Source: ARTC, 2015 Wagga Wagga Albury 11 km from Tottenham to Port Melbourne Melbourne 5 THE CHALLENGE GETTING TO THE PORT OF BRISBANE Connection Toowoomba to Brisbane poses a key challenge in the delivery of Inland Rail in five areas. Problem 2 Crossing the Lockyer Valley Flood Plain requires 47km of new dual gauge track (only half in the exist- ing corridor) and a 1km tunnel through the Little Liverpool Range. Estimated cost $1 B (ARTC). Problem 4 Kagaru to Acacia.No cost highlighted for this component which will be high. Significant community issues with rail traffic through residential areas. Problem 1 Descending the Toowoomba Range requires a 26lm of new dual gauge track and a 6.2km tunnel, 13 bridges and viaduct structures, and 3 Problem 3 crossing loops. Estimated cost Connecting to the Interstate Rail Problem 5 $1.45 B (ARTC). Line requires 53 km of new single-track dual-gauge line, a 1km Connecting to the Port of tunnel through the Teviot Range, 27 Brisbane requires a dedicated bridges and 4 crossing loops 38km new rail line to over- Estimated cost $1.29 B (ARTC). come a range of existing bottlenecks in metro Brisbane. Estimated cost $2.84 B (DAE). 6 Toowoomba Gladstone Inland Rail Acacia Ridge is also constrained by adjacent residential and environmentally sensitive areas and cannot grow. Terminating Overcoming Inland Rail at Acacia Ridge will significantly increase truck movements in Brisbane’s southern suburbs between Acacia these challenges Ridge and the Port of Brisbane. represents 50% of the cost of Inland Rail (Melbourne to Port of Brisbane) for just 10% of the distance. Legends Acacia Ridge Residential Environmental Light Industrial 7 CONNECTING TO GLADSTONE PORT IS A BETTER OPTION Port of Gladstone overcomes all of the challenges connecting Inland Rail to the Port of Brisbane Saves $4.8 B in construction Closer to key import/export Environmental Impact Statement costs compared to extending markets, reducing time at sea for the Surat Basin Rail Project has Inland Rail to Brisbane and supply chain costs previously been approved Considerable reduction in road Quicker distribution of freight for SEQ Prevent disruption to Brisbane and rail congestion in South from Toowoomba via the new second residents by avoiding heavy civil East Queensland range crossing construction in urban areas With Inland Rail, Gladstone can enable growth in import/ export freight volumes to dominant East Asian markets without requiring significant urban disruption from port expansion in Brisbane, Sydney, or Melbourne, or adding to congestion in Australia’s largest cities. 8 Toowoomba GLADSTONE PORT OVERVIEW Gladstone Inland Rail Port of Gladstone is a vital economic enabler for Central Queensland. Queensland’s largest Australia’s 3rd largest multi-commodity port coal export port Port Central Fisherman’s Landing Additional three berths Fisherman’s Landing constructed at Port Reconfiguration of Port Home to Queensland’s currently has four Central, with the total berths with expansion eight berths having the plans to develop capacity to handle Central for container cargo three LNG export trains another seven, 250,000-300,000 TEUs Channel Duplication including a land base per annum. Approved EIS for port of 200 hectares. channel duplication - $750 million project. 01 Dedicated rail links to Growth plans to triple WICET & RG Tanna CORAL SEA Coal Terminal all port berths throughout to 2050 BRUCE HIGHWAY 04 Doubling coal export 03 capacity of WICET to 60mtpa. Plans for a 05 fifth berth at the RG Tanna terminal which Future growth secured Capable of handling would add a further 15 02 Mtpa capacity. through Gladstone State multiple Capesize ships Development Area simultaneously Gladstone State Development Area 20,000ha of develop- Bruce Highway Boyne Island able land at GSDA to Road to Gladstone Growth capacity of 24 Dual shipping lanes support secondary warehousing and Existing Rail Network additional berths being developed logistics businesses. Inland Rail Route 9 INLAND RAIL DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS FROM TOOWOOMBA Gladstone Callemondah to Option 1: Option 2: Auckland Point (7 km) ToowoombaWooderson to Gladstone Toowoomba to Brisbane $101 m Wooderson to Callemondah (32 km) Total cost $3.4 billion $8.1 billion Gladstone Moura $97 m Total distance 646 km 480 km Wooderson Cost per km $5.24 m/km $16.97 m/km Banana to Wooderson (129 km) Moura Banana $378 m Southern Missing Link (Wandoan to Banana) (215 km) $1,263 m Wandoan Miles to Toowoomba/ Wandoan (65 km) Oakey to Miles (198 km) $430 m $950 m Miles Wandoan Gowrie to Helidon (28 km) Acacia Ridge to Miles to Wandoan (65 km) Toowoomba/ Oakey to Miles (198 km) $1,454 m Port of Brisbane (37 km) $430 m $950 m $2,840 m Miles Gowrie Oakey Brisbane Helidon Calvert Oakey to Toowoomba Toowoomba Acacia Ridge Range Tunnel (16 km) Kagaru to $102 m Acacia Ridge (36 km) Gowrie Kagaru $0 m Oakey Brisbane Helidon Helidon to Calvert (47 km) Calvert to Kagaru Calvert Oakey to Toowoomba Toowoomba Acacia Ridge $1,077 m (53 km) Range Tunnel (16 km) $1,292 m $102 m Kagaru Gladstone Inland Rail development Brisbane Inland Rail development To NSW Gladstone Inland Rail development Melbourne to Toowoomba Inland Rail Brisbane Inland Rail development Melbourne to Toowoomba Inland Rail To NSW 10 Toowoomba INLAND RAIL DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS Gladstone FROM TOOWOOMBA Inland Rail Project Viability Summary of Costs and Benefits, 4% Discount Rate, 2021 to 2125 Comparing the two options, it can be seen that the Inland Rail to Inland Rail to the development of Inland Railto Port of Gladstone would be far Gladstone Port Port of Brisbane more economically desirable the developing Inland Rail from Costs Toowoomba to the Port of Brisbane. Construction Costs for Rail Infrastructure $2,970 $7,174 Development Cost of Additional Port Infrastructure $502 - Additional Rail Operating and Maintenance Costs $128 $89 Coal Development Costs $4,244 $2,288 Total $7,845 $9,551 Benefits Coal Producer Margins $7,459 $4,028 Coal Labour Benefit $2,028 $1,095 Intermodal Freight Efficiency Benefits $1,364 $2,132 Social/Environmental Benefits - Land-Based Transport $1,212 $2,168 Environmental Benefits from Larger Ships $315 - Reduced Toowoomba Range Maintenance - $206 Total $12,378 $9,629 Summary Net Present Value of the Project $4,533 $78 Benefit for Every $1 Spent 1.58 1.01 Source: AEC. 11 SEA FREIGHT PRODUCTIVITY Australia’s capacity to benefit from increased sea freight productivity is limited to the port-side capacity of our container ports and capacity to manage ever-increasing ship sizes. Improving the productivity of sea freight will improve the international competitiveness of Australia’s exports as well as reduce the cost of imported consumer goods. Capacity to handle modern Port depth to Draft (m) TEU container ships manage ship size 10.0 2,500 Of all container ports on the east 12.5 3,400 coast of Australia, Gladstone Port and the Port Botany 12.5 4,500 (Sydney) are the only ports that can accommodate the newer 13.0 5,000 larger ship sizes. Port of Brisbane 14.5 8,000 8,000+ TEU (Twenty-Foot Equivalent Unit) Maximum container ship size 15.2 12,500 Port of Gladstone 15.5 18,000 18,000+ TEU (Twenty-Foot Equivalent Unit) Maximum container ship size 16.0 21,413 12 Toowoomba SEA FREIGHT PRODUCTIVITY Gladstone Inland Rail To/from Closer to key markets Shanghai, China Shanghai Gladstone’s proximity to Australia’s key import/export markets provides additional productivity benefits for the economy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Western Downs Development Status Report
    Toowoomba and Surat Basin Enterprise Western Downs Development Status Report June 2020 www.tsbe.com.au WESTERN DOWNS DEVELOPMENT STATUS REPORT The Western Downs, located in the agricultural heartland of Southern Queensland, is a region experiencing strong economic growth, investment and consistently high employment. The region is well known for its rich agriculture and great liveability, but its biggest wealth is in its people and communities. Home to a growing population of 34,500 people, the Western Downs is a region known for welcoming industry and innovation as well as extending its country hospitality to all new residents and businesses. The Western Downs Development Status Report is a document produced in partnership with Western Downs Regional Council and is updated annually. It equips readers with knowledge including costs, locations and estimated completion dates for known developments in the Western Downs region across infrastructure and services, property development, building and construction, resources and renewable energy projects. Toowoomba and Surat Basin Enterprise (TSBE) is committed to fostering and facilitating the sustainable growth and development of the region and works with stakeholders across the Western Downs to support the local business community. TSBE supports regional businesses through the delivery of information, business support programs, advocacy and regional promotion, as well as membership services to many local businesses. The cornerstones of the economy are agriculture, intensive agriculture, energy and manufacturing — industries which continue to boast a significant number of projects in the pipeline for the Western Downs area. TSBE and Western Downs Regional Council hope this report will encourage further investment in the region, while also providing businesses with important information to help them explore new opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Land Valuations Overview Western Downs
    Land valuations overview: Western Downs Regional Council On 31 March 2021, the Valuer-General released land valuations for 17,760 properties with a total value of $4,403,967,344 in the Western Downs Regional Council area. The valuations reflect land values at 1 October 2020 and show that Western Downs region has increased by 21.6 per cent overall since the last valuation in 2019. Rural land values have generally increased moderately, except for around Wandoan where there have been significant increases, due to the strength in beef commodity prices as well as a low interest rate environment. Residential land values in the townships of Dalby and Miles have generally remained unchanged, with moderate increases in Chinchilla, and moderate reductions within the towns of Tara and Wandoan. Commercial and industrial lands generally remain unchanged, except for some isolated changes along the Warrego Highway in Dalby. Inspect the land valuation display listing View the valuation display listing for Western Downs Regional Council online at www.qld.gov.au/landvaluation or visit the Department of Resources, 30 Nicholson Street, Dalby. Detailed valuation data for Western Downs Regional Council Valuations were last issued in the Western Downs Regional Council area in 2019. Property land use by total new value Residential land Table 1 below provides information on median values for residential land within the Western Downs Regional Council area. Table 1 - Median value of residential land Residential Previous New median Change in Number of localities
    [Show full text]
  • Metallica Minerals Limited
    COLUMBOOLA JV A.C.N. 141 993 535 A.C.N. 117 763 443 EPC 1165 “Columboola” COLUMBOOLA PROJECT ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE SEVENTH YEAR PERIOD 10/12/2013 to 9/12/2014 TENEMENT HOLDER: SINOCOAL RESOURCES PTY LTD 51% METROCOAL LIMITED 49% MANAGER: COLUMBOOLA JOINT VENTURE AUTHORS: N. VILLA MAP SHEETS: 1: 250 000 Chinchilla SG56 9 1: 100 000 Miles 8944, Guluguba 8945 COMMODITIES: COAL GEOGRAPHIC COORDS: 26° 40'S / 150°11'E DATE: 12 January 2015 1 Table of Contents Page No. 1. SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 4 2. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 6 3. LOCATION, ACCESS & SETTING ................................................................. 7 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................................... 7 Endangered Regional Ecosystems .................................................................................................... 7 Other Environmentally Sensitive Areas ............................................................................................. 9 Cultural Heritage / Aboriginal Cultural Heritage / Heritage Sites.................................................... 9 4. INDUSTRY BACKGROUND AND MARKET ................................................. 11 RECENT MINING HISTORY AND COAL UTILIZATION ................................................ 11 CONVENTIONAL MINING OPPORTUNITIES – OPEN CAST AND UNDERGROUND ....... 12 5. TENURE ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Western Downs Regional Organisations of Council Freight
    Western Downs Regional Organisations of Council Freight Network Integration Issues and Opportunities Submission to Federal Government Enquiry Report May 2005 Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Western Downs Regional Organisation of Councils 1 1.3 The Transport Network 1 2. Role of the Transport Network 5 2.1 Overview 5 2.2 Freight Movement 5 2.3 Road Transport 7 2.4 Rail Transport 8 2.5 Intermodal Hubs 9 3. Relationship and Co-ordination between Road and Rail Networks and Ports 10 3.1 Overview 10 3.2 Port Capacities 10 3.3 Rail Capacities 11 3.4 Road Capacities 12 4. Potential Improvements 14 4.1 Land Transport Access to Ports 14 4.2 Capacity and Operation of Ports 17 4.3 Movement of Bulk Freight from Region 18 4.4 Intermodal Hubs 19 4.5 Existing Infrastructure Efficiencies 19 4.6 Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Opportunities 20 Table Index Table 1 Road Operational Costs to the Port of Brisbane 7 Table 2 Road Operational Costs to the Port of Gladstone 8 Table 3 Rail Operational Costs from WDROC Intermodal Facility to Ports 9 Table 4 Indicative Rail Capacity (WDROC to Brisbane) 12 Table 5 Moura Line Additional Freight Capacity 12 41/14617/322471 Frieight Network Integration Issues and Opportunities Submission to Federal Government Enquiry Table 6 Road Capacity (WDROC to Brisbane) by Proportion of Heavy Vehicles (HV) in traffic Stream 13 Table 7 Maximum Achievable Mode Share Split Based on Current Infrastructure 13 Table 8 Road Travel Time to Ports of Brisbane and Gladstone 14 Table 9 Current Rail Travel Time to Ports
    [Show full text]
  • Gladstone Region Population Report, 2016
    Queensland Government Statistician’s Office Gladstone region population report, 2016 Introduction The Gladstone region population report, 2016 provides estimates of Figure 1 Gladstone region the non-resident population of the Gladstone region during the last week of June 2016, based on surveys conducted by Queensland Government Statistician’s Office (QGSO). Information regarding the supply and take-up of commercial accommodation by non-resident workers is also summarised. The non-resident population represents the number of fly-in/fly-out and drive-in/drive-out (FIFO/DIDO) workers who were on-shift in the region at the time of collection. This group includes those involved in the production, construction, and maintenance of mining and gas industry operations, projects and related infrastructure. Non-resident workers are not included in estimated resident population (ERP) data released annually by the Australian Bureau of Statistics. As a result, the full–time equivalent (FTE) population estimates presented in this report, which combine the resident and non-resident populations, provide a more complete indicator of total demand for certain services than either measure used alone. Key findings Key findings of this report include: The non-resident population of the Gladstone region was The Gladstone region – at a glance estimated at 1,540 persons at the end of June 2016, around 3,890 persons or 72% lower than in June 2015. The Gladstone region comprises the local government area (LGA) of Gladstone (R), which Gladstone region's non-resident population in 2015–16 largely includes the city and port of Gladstone, as well as comprised FIFO/DIDO workers engaged in construction of three other residential centres and the rural hinterland.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly Hansard 1964
    Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly TUESDAY, 20 OCTOBER 1964 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy Questions [20 OCTOBER) Questions 833 Answer:- "The Honourable Member might address his Question to my colleague, the Treasurer, within whose administration the Fisheries Department comes." ADVERTISING OF STATE ELECTRICITY COMMISSION LOANS.-Mr. Bromley, pursuant to notice, asked The Minister for Industrial Development,- (1) What is the name of the advertising firm which arranges the advertisements in connection with State Electricity Com­ mission loans? (2) Has this firm always done the advertising? (3) How much money was allocated to this firm for Loan No. 35? ( 4) How much money has been allocated for advertising in (a) press TUESDAY, 20 OCTOBER, 1964 (b) radio and (c) television for each Commission loan since 1957? (5) What percentage does the agent Mr. SPEAKER (Hon. D. E. Nicholson, receive per loan and what amount of Murrumba) read prayers and took the chair money is paid by the Commission to the at 11 a.m. agents for advertising each loan? (6) Have loans since 1957 all been QUESTIONS filled? If not, what are the figures GERIATRIC WARD, TOWNSVILLE GENERAL concerning them? HosPITAL.-Mr. Aikens, pursuant to notice, asked The Minister for Health,- Answers:- Has any finality been reached with regard ! am advised by the Commissioner for to the replacement of the present obsoles­ Electricity Supply on these matters as cent and inadequate geriatric ward at the follows:- Townsville General Hospital with a modern building capable of accommodating all (1) "Le Grand Advertising Pty. Ltd." patients who require admission and, if so, will he give relevant details? (2) "Yes, beginning in April, 1952, when the Commission made its first public Answer:- issue." "The Townsville Hospitals Board has a ( 3) "A provision of £30,000 was number of projects for extensions to the budgetted for, to cover all costs of Queens­ Hospital services in Townsville which will land and interstate advertising including cost in the vicinity of £700,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Surat Basin Non-Resident Population Projections, 2021 to 2025
    Queensland Government Statistician’s Office Surat Basin non–resident population projections, 2021 to 2025 Introduction The resource sector in regional Queensland utilises fly-in/fly-out Figure 1 Surat Basin region and drive-in/drive-out (FIFO/DIDO) workers as a source of labour supply. These non-resident workers live in the regions only while on-shift (refer to Notes, page 9). The Australian Bureau of Statistics’ (ABS) official population estimates and the Queensland Government’s population projections for these areas only include residents. To support planning for population change, the Queensland Government Statistician’s Office (QGSO) publishes annual non–resident population estimates and projections for selected resource regions. This report provides a range of non–resident population projections for local government areas (LGAs) in the Surat Basin region (Figure 1), from 2021 to 2025. The projection series represent the projected non-resident populations associated with existing resource operations and future projects in the region. Projects are categorised according to their standing in the approvals pipeline, including stages of In this publication, the Surat Basin region is defined as the environmental impact statement (EIS) process, and the local government areas (LGAs) of Maranoa (R), progress towards achieving financial close. Series A is based Western Downs (R) and Toowoomba (R). on existing operations, projects under construction and approved projects that have reached financial close. Series B, C and D projections are based on projects that are at earlier stages of the approvals process. Projections in this report are derived from surveys conducted by QGSO and other sources. Data tables to supplement the report are available on the QGSO website (www.qgso.qld.gov.au).
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Independent Review of the Port of Gladstone
    A member group of Lock the Gate Alliance www.savethereef.net.au Dr Andrew Jeremijenko [email protected] 0438372653 Chad Kirby [email protected] Dr Libby Connors [email protected] 0429487110 Gladstone Review Secretariat PO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601 Email: [email protected] Submission to the Independent Review of the Port of Gladstone Thank you for this opportunity to make a submission. Save the Reef would like to respond to points a) to e) of the terms of reference. a) all previous review findings and information used as a basis for the current approvals for development in the Port of Gladstone; Save the Reef has concerns about the approvals process. There is the suspicion that pressure has been applied at all levels from the inception of the idea, where World Heritage Status and the Outstanding Universal Value of Gladstone harbour and Curtis Island was not properly accounted, through to the Environmental Impact Statements that minimised the environmental sensitivity of the area and did not adequately assess the risks, through to the approval process at both state and federal levels. Coordinator-General Decision-Making Process Three CSG/LNG plants are currently being constructed on Curtis Island. Additionally, the statutory authority, Gladstone Ports Corporation [GPC] is undertaking major coal terminal expansion and preparatory work for potential additional csg/LNG plants on the mainland. In order to support this infrastructure Gladstone Ports Corporation is undertaking the largest dredging operation ever attempted in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area. The Ports Corporation plans to dredge 46 million cubic tonnes from Gladstone Harbour and the LNG sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Q-LNG01-95-AQ-0035 Project Report Template Rev 2
    REPORT Biannual Social Impact Management Plan Progress Report Q-LNG01-15-RP-0726 Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Project A report on the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Social Impact Management Plan progress January to June 2014 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Biannual Social Impact Management Plan Progress Report REPORT Release Notice This document is available through the Australia Pacific LNG (Australia Pacific LNG) Upstream Project controlled document system TeamBinder™. The responsibility for ensuring that printed copies remain valid rests with the user. Once printed, this is an uncontrolled document unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Third-party issue can be requested via the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Project Document Control Group. Document Conventions The following terms in this document apply: Will, shall or must indicate a mandatory course of action Should indicates a recommended course of action May or can indicate a possible course of action. Document Custodian The custodian of this document is the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Project General Manager, Business Integrity. The custodian is responsible for maintaining and controlling changes (additions and modifications) to this document and ensuring the stakeholders validate any changes made to this document. Deviations from Document Any deviation from this document must be approved by the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Project General Manager, Business Integrity. Doc Ref: Q-LNG01-15-RP-0726 Revision: 0 Page 2 of 23 Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Project Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Biannual Social Impact Management Plan Progress Report REPORT Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Project Development ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TAROOM SHOW SOCIETY NEWSLETTER May 2014
    TAROOM SHOW SOCIETY NEWSLETTER May 2014 Thank you! The Taroom Show Society would like to sincerely thank everyone who contributed to this year‟s outstanding show- exhibitors, competitors, sponsors, stall holders, families and other visitors. Show president Shane Williams said the 2014 event was a great success, with numerous highlights. “We had the Origin Lumberjack Show, which was an international act and a first for Taroom. The crowd loved it, and the Lumberjacks loved their time in Taroom,” Mr Williams said. “We had the Santos Ladies marquee, the prestigious pet parade, a wine and cheese afternoon, the men‟s chocolate cake competition, plus the traditional Showgirl and Rural Ambassador competitions, just to name a few things.” “We had a huge number of stud cattle compete for what is arguably the largest prize pool in Queensland outside a major city. The Super Bull and Junior Bull Challenges are always a good drawcard. We had over 60 competitors in one show jumping class, making Taroom one of the most popular shows in Queensland. “It was great to see so many people enjoy themselves, and fill the grounds with such a positive vibe. Taroom is such a professionally run show for a small town and it‟s a credit for all those involved,” Mr Williams said. Two volunteers were recognised for their hard work over the years, with life membership being presented to Malcolm and Ann McIntyre. Christie McLennan, 2014 Rural Ambassador Kim Hay, and the 2013 Ian Williams, secretary Tennille Lacey, Miss Show Princess runner-up Queensland Rural Ambassador Jess and president Shane Williams.
    [Show full text]
  • Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service (DDHHS) Involving: Western Cluster, and Southern Cluster – Rural Division
    Proposed Implementation Plan Organisational Realignment – Rural Division Director of Medical Services Purpose This document provides an overview of a proposed modification of the organisational structure within Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service (DDHHS) involving: Western Cluster, and Southern Cluster – Rural division This document aims to broadly guide affected staff through the scope and implementation process of the proposed change and outlines possible impacts on employees. The document is intended to: • support consultation in relation to the change and the way the proposed change is implemented; and • invite input into the change and ways in which any adverse impacts of the change can be minimised. Background The Rural division delivers excellence in healthcare, to optimise patient centered outcomes for our community. This is achieved by enabling safe, accessible, sustainable, and evidence-based healthcare by a highly skilled and valued workforce. The Rural division consists of: • seven regional hospitals • nine smaller hospitals • six residential aged care facilities • three Multipurpose health services • three outpatient facilities to provide a range of community based health services The Rural division is organised into three clusters, each led by a Cluster Director of Nursing (CDON), and supported by a Director of Medical Services (DMS) as detailed below: Each CDON reports directly to the Executive Director Rural (EDR) operationally and professionally to the Executive Director of Nursing and Midwifery (EDNMS) and consists of the following positions: Cluster Medical lead-position No of Medical No of direct reports to Superintendents Medical Superintendents South Director of Medical Services, 3 15.12 Burnett South Burnett Southern 5.5 24.31 Director of Medical Services, Western Rural 7.0 14.42 In the current structure, the DMS South Burnett operationally reports to the Director of Nursing (DON), Kingaroy Hospital which is the facility with highest activity within the cluster; and the DMS Rural operationally reports to the EDR.
    [Show full text]
  • Wiggins Island Rail Project Balloon Loop
    Wiggins Island Rail Project Balloon Loop The Wiggins Island Rail Project (WIRP) is the staged development of new rail lines and upgrading of existing lines to service the new Wiggins Island Coal Export Terminal (WICET) at the Port of Gladstone. About the Project WIRP Stage One includes constructing a new 13km Balloon Loop Fast Facts Balloon Loop from the North Coast Line near Yarwun to enable unloading of coal for the new port facility. Construction of 13km rail loop Works at the Balloon Loop project site include earthworks and drainage, track infrastructure, Location: Near Yarwun, Gladstone overhead electrical equipment, power systems, signals and telecommunications. Approximate project value: $200 million Once operational, coal trains will travel from mines Construction start: Mid 2012 in the southern Bowen Basin along Aurizon’s rail network to the Balloon Loop where it will be unloaded onto Est. construction completion: End 2013 WICET’s conveyor and carried to the port for export. Up to five trains can be held on the Balloon Loop Workers at peak construction: Approximately 180 at one time - three on the arrival side waiting to be unloaded, one at the unloader unloading coal, and one on the departure side heading back to the mines. Environment Beaks Creek Diversion Aurizon aims to continuously improve our Beaks Creek flows from the southern slope of Mount environmental performance. Martin in the Calliope Conservation Park, prior to meeting the Calliope River about one kilometre A comprehensive Environmental Management Plan upstream of the Calliope River rail bridges. will be implemented on site. As a result of the Balloon Loop works, a new drainage Aurizon will work to offset environmental rehabilitation channel is needed to manage flows from Beaks Creek.
    [Show full text]