DOCSLIB.ORG

Gecko Diversity: a History of Global Discovery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gecko Diversity: a History of Global Discovery Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution, 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22244662-bja10003 Gecko diversity: a history of global discovery Peter Uetza,*, Alex Slavenkob,c, Shai Meiric,d and Matthew Heinickee,* aCenter for Biological Data Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1000 W Cary St, Richmond, VA 23284, USA bDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Shefeld, Shefeld S10 2TN, UK cSchool of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, 6997801, Tel-Aviv, Israel dThe Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel Aviv University, 6997801, Tel-Aviv, Israel eDepartment of Natural Sciences, University of Michigan-Dearborn,4901 Evergreen Rd., Dearborn, MI 48128, USA Abstract 1935 gecko species (and 224 subspecies) were known in December 2019 in seven families and 124 genera. These nearly 2000 species were described by ~950 individuals of whom more than 100 described more than 10 gecko species each. Most gecko species were discovered during the past 40 years. The primary type specimens of all currently recognized geckos (including subspecies) are distributed over 161 collections worldwide, with 20 collections having about two thirds of all primary types. The primary type specimens of about 40 gecko taxa have been lost or unknown. The phylogeny of geckos is well studied, with DNA sequences being available for ~76% of all geckos (compared to ~63% in other reptiles) and morphological characters now being collected in databases. Geographically, geckos occur on fve continents and many islands but are most species-rich in Australasia (which also houses the greatest diversity of family-level taxa), Southeast Asia, Africa, Madagascar, and the West Indies. Among countries, Australia has the highest number of geckos (241 species), with India, Madagascar, and Malaysia being the only other countries with more than 100 described species each. As expected, when correcting for land area, countries outside the tropics have fewer geckos. Keywords Carphodactylidae; Diplodactylidae; Eublepharidae; Gekkonidae; Gekkota; Phyllodactylidae; Pygopodidae; Sphaerodactylidae Introduction is obviously not true for human commensals such as some Geckos (Sauria: Gekkota; 1935 species) are one of three Hemidactylus or conspicuous day geckos such as Lygo- mega-diverse lineages of squamate reptiles (lizards, dactylus or Phelsuma. Nevertheless, many geckos were snakes, and amphisbaenians), along with the 1685 species described early in the history of herpetology. We fnally of skinks and 1965 species of colubrid snakes (Uetz et al. discuss the factors for species discovery and diversity and 2019), that are known today as result of the major squamate how it relates to gecko biology. radiations that began diversifying about 200 million years ago. All gecko families are relatively old compared to ei- ther skinks or colubrids. Molecular clock estimates place A history of gecko discovery the origins of gecko families deep in the Mesozoic (Gamble Only three geckos were described by Linnaeus (1758) — et al. 2008a, b, 2011; Hedges et al. 2015; Zheng and Wiens the Tokay gecko (Lacerta Gecko to Linnaeus, now Gekko 2016), and stem gekkotan fossils dating from the late Juras- gecko), Mediterranean house gecko (as Lacerta turcica, sic and Cretaceous have been recovered from multiple dis- now Hemidactylus turcicus), and Moorish gecko (Lacerta tant localities in Eurasia (Daza et al. 2014, 2016; Gauthier mauritanica, now Tarentola mauritanica). It then took her- et al. 2012; Simões et al. 2017). Not all gecko lineages have petologists 227 years, from 1758 to 1984, to describe the diversifed at the same rate. For example, there are 38 spe- frst 1000 gecko species. It has taken only 35 to describe cies of Eublepharidae, compared to 1632 species in their the next 921 (not counting subspecies). Early descrip- sister lineage (Gekkonidae + Phyllodactylidae + Sphaero- tions of gecko species commonly appeared in regional dactylidae). Thus, the high species richness of geckos has monographs or travelogues (e.g. Spix 1825) or else more been produced largely by diversifcation of a subset of suc- general zoological works (e.g. Daudin 1802). Some also cessful lineages. appeared as stand-alone contributions to journals or soci- Here we focus on the history of discovery and descrip- ety proceedings (e.g. Sparrman 1778). Early descriptions tion of gecko species. In addition, we review the diversity peaked in the mid-19th century with 19 species described of geckos in terms of species numbers, both taxonomi- in each of 1836, 1845, 1870, and 1885 (Fig. 1). These num- cally and geographically, but also in terms of discovery. bers were driven by the monumental works of André M.C. As mostly small and nocturnal species (Meiri 2020, this Duméril and Gabriel Bibron (Duméril and Bibron 1836), volume), many geckos are easy to overlook, though this John E. Gray (Gray 1845), Richard H. Beddome (Beddome *Corresponding authors. E-mails: [email protected] / [email protected] © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden 2020 <UN> 2 P. Uetz et al. Figure 1. Gecko species described per year 1758–2019. Some prolifc gecko describers from the 19th century are highlighted. The number of new species descriptions has surged in the past 15 years, supported by widely accessible molecular techniques and other advances. 1870a, b) and George A. Boulenger (Boulenger 1885) that Table 1. Top-11 authors who described the most gecko species were published in those years. These annual totals were still recognized as valid (i.e. 40 or more). only exceeded a century later with 24 species described in Author Species 1978. Even though 19th century authors have described most geckos in single publications, only Gray and Boulenger are Aaron M. Bauer 143 L. Lee Grismer 132 among the 10 most prolifc gecko describers (Table 1). In th Perry L. Wood 98 the late 20 century molecular methods such as karyotyp- George A. Boulenger 77 ing (e.g. Murphy 1974; King 1982) and allozyme electro- Evan S. H. Quah 63 phoresis (e.g. Branch et al. 1995) began to be employed Olivier S. G. Pauwels 54 to aid in new species discovery. Discoveries skyrocketed John E. Gray 49 st Montri Sumontha 45 in the 21 century (Meiri 2016; Uetz and Stylianou 2018) Thomas Ziegler 44 with the advent of new technologies, such as the internet, Paul Doughty 40 DNA sequencing, digital photography, and cheaper travel Paul M. Oliver 40 permitting access to remote areas, as well as the ability for individual researchers to study collections at distant species discovery such as feldwork, morphological work, museums. Nevertheless, even in modern times, gecko dis- molecular work, specimen comparisons, statistical analy- covery has been driven by relatively few individuals. Thus, sis, and literature review. In some cases this may result the 1935 gekkotans described since 1758 were authored by in species descriptions with many authors. For instance, about 950 individuals (Uetz and Stylianou 2018), of whom several gecko species have been described with more than about 100 described more than 10 gecko species each. a dozen authors, such as Cyrtodactylus phuocbinhensis Eight of the ten most prolifc describers of new species are Nguyen et al. 2013, Cyrtodactylus taynguyenensis Nguyen currently active herpetologists, with two (Aaron M. Bauer et al. 2013, Cyrtodactylus puhuensis Nguyen et al. 2014, and L. Lee Grismer) describing more than 130 species each and Cnemaspis bidongensis Grismer et al. 2014, each with (Table 1). 14 authors. None of these approach the reptile species with From the 18th through 20th centuries, most gecko spe- the highest number of authors though, which is the leio- cies were described by one or two authors. The earliest saurid Enyalius capetinga Breitman et al. 2018, with 27 au- gecko species description with more than two authors ap- thors. Many of the most prolifc gecko describers (Table 1) peared in 1970 (Minton et al. 1970). Team taxonomy has have worked together, thus, for example, almost all the de- become the norm in the 21st century, as diferent scientists scriptions by Perry Wood and Evan Quah were co-authored are often needed to carry out distinct tasks in the process of by Lee Grismer. <UN> Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution 3 Type specimens of geckos Table 2. The top-10 collections that hold the most gekkotan pri- The primary types of the ~2000 species of geckos are kept mary types (species and subspecies). For additional type infor- in 161 collections worldwide, with 20 collections having mation see Uetz et al. (2019). about two thirds of all types (see also Uetz et al. 2019, Collection Taxa with types Table 2, Fig. 2). This is important for researchers who de- scribe new species and need to compare them to the types BMNH (London, UK) 285 MCZ (Cambridge, USA) 130 of previously described ones. By far the most gecko pri- MNHN-RA (Paris, France) 107 mary type specimens are held at the Natural History Mu- WAM (Perth, Australia) 100 seum, London (BMNH; types of 285 taxa). Among its USNM (Washington, DC, USA) 68 collections are most of the types of species described by CAS (San Francisco, USA) 69 Gray, Boulenger, and Beddome in their major 19th century SMF (Frankfurt, Germany) 68 ZMB (Berlin, Germany) 57 works, along with many types designated by Nicolas Ar- ZFMK (Bonn, Germany) 55 nold, Albert Günther, Hampton Wildman Parker, Malcolm DNMNH (Pretoria, South Africa) 52 Smith, and others, and its type specimens originate from across the globe. The Muséum National d'Histoire Na- turelle, Paris (MNHN) has a similar global scope and many primary types held at these two institutions originate from types dating from the 19th century work of Duméril and their respective continents. Fifty one institutions have only Bibron with more recent types, e.g. designated by Aaron a single primary gecko type specimen and 21 have two. Bauer and Georges Pasteur, among others. Major collec- The VertNet database (Constable et al. 2010) is the larg- tions often have geographic foci that refect the work of est meta-database of vertebrate collections, and returned scientists afliated with these institutions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Squamata: Gekkota: Carphodactylidae) from the Pilbara Region of Western Australia
    Zootaxa 3010: 20–30 (2011) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2011 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A new species of Underwoodisaurus (Squamata: Gekkota: Carphodactylidae) from the Pilbara region of Western Australia PAUL DOUGHTY1,3 & PAUL M. OLIVER2 1Department of Terrestrial Vertebrates, Western Australian Museum, 49 Kew Street, Welshpool, Western Australia 6106, Australia 2Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5005, and Herpetology Section, South Australian Museum, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia. 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Ongoing surveys and systematic work focused on the Pilbara region in Western Australia have revealed the existence of numerous unrecognized species of reptiles. Here we describe Underwoodisaurus seorsus sp. nov., a new species similar to U. milii, but differing in its relatively plain dorsal and head patterns with only sparsely scattered pale tubercles, a much more gracile build, including longer snout, limbs and digits, smaller and more numerous fine scales on the dorsum, and the enlarged tubercles on the tail tending not to form transverse rows. The new species is known from few specimens and has only been encountered at mid elevations in the Hamersley Ranges, widely separated from the closest populations of U. milii in the northern Goldfields and Shark Bay in Western Australia. Given its rarity and small (potentially relictual) distribution this species may be of conservation concern. Key words: conservation, gecko, Underwoodisaurus milii, relictual distribution Introduction The Pilbara region of Western Australia supports one of the most diverse reptile faunas on the Australian continent (How & Cowan 2006; Powney et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrative and Comparative Biology Integrative and Comparative Biology, Pp
    Integrative and Comparative Biology Integrative and Comparative Biology, pp. 1–17 doi:10.1093/icb/icz006 Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology SYMPOSIUM 2019 April 28 on user Cities Twin - Minnesota of by University https://academic.oup.com/icb/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/icb/icz006/5381544 from Downloaded Evolution of the Gekkotan Adhesive System: Does Digit Anatomy Point to One or More Origins? Anthony P. Russell1,* and Tony Gamble†,‡,§ *Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4; †Department of Biological Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA; ‡Bell Museum of Natural History, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55113, USA; §Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA From the symposium “The path less traveled: Reciprocal illumination of gecko adhesion by unifying material science, biomechanics, ecology, and evolution” presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Integrative and Comparative Biology, January 3–7, 2019 at Tampa, Florida. 1E-mail: [email protected] Synopsis Recently-developed, molecularly-based phylogenies of geckos have provided the basis for reassessing the number of times adhesive toe-pads have arisen within the Gekkota. At present both a single origin and multiple origin hypotheses prevail, each of which has consequences that relate to explanations about digit form and evolutionary transitions underlying the enormous variation in adhesive toe pad structure among extant, limbed geckos (pygopods lack pertinent features). These competing hypotheses result from mapping the distribution of toe pads onto a phylo- genetic framework employing the simple binary expedient of whether such toe pads are present or absent.
    [Show full text]
  • Anolis Planiceps (Leaf Anole)
    UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Diversity Anolis planiceps (Leaf Anole) Family: Polychrotidae (Anoles and Tree Lizards) Order: Squamata (Lizards and Snakes) Class: Reptilia (Reptiles) Fig. 1. Leaf anole, Anolis planiceps. [http://www.trinidad-tobagoherps.org/Images/planiceps.jpg, downloaded 24 October 2016] TRAITS. Formerly known as Anolis chrysolepis or Norops chrysolepis, the leaf anole measures up to 76mm from snout to vent according (D'Angiolella et al., 2011). The pads of their feet are specialised to help them rest on leaves and trunks (Fig. 1). They have a spotted red patch of skin below theirs jaws, which is extendable, called the dewlap (Fig. 2). The region along the lizard's spine has larger scales than the adjacent areas with those located in the mid-dorsal area being the largest. Along their heads are two prominent ridges as well as ridged (keeled) scales located above the eyes (Fig. 3). The dorsal scales of the leaf anole are several shades of brown while the ventral scales are a pale cream colour; patterns vary greatly within populations (Fig. 4) (Vanzolini and Williams, 1970). Male anoles have longer tails and the females have wider bodies and smaller dewlaps than males (Vitt and Zani, 2011). DISTRIBUTION. Leaf anoles may be found in a relatively wide range from east Venezuela to Guyana, Suriname, Columbia, Trinidad and Brazil (Fig. 5). They are found throughout the island of Trinidad primarily in terrestrial, highly forested areas (D'Angiolella et al, 2011). UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Diversity HABITAT AND ECOLOGY.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Behaviour of Burton's Legless Lizard (Lialis Burtonis, Pygopodidae) in Tropical Australia
    Asian Herpetological Research 2013, 4(1): 9–21 DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1245.2013.00009 Ecology and Behaviour of Burton’s Legless Lizard (Lialis burtonis, Pygopodidae) in Tropical Australia Michael WALL1, 2 and Richard SHINE1* 1 School of Biological Sciences A08, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia 2 Current address: 4940 Anza St. No. 4, San Francisco, CA 94121, USA Abstract The elongate, functionally limbless flap-footed lizards (family Pygopodidae) are found throughout Australia, ranging into southern New Guinea. Despite their diversity and abundance in most Australian ecosystems, pygopodids have attracted little scientific study. An intensive ecological study of one pygopodid, Burton’s legless lizard (Lialis burtonis Gray 1835), was conducted in Australia’s tropical Northern Territory. L. burtonis eats nothing but other lizards, primarily skinks, and appears to feed relatively infrequently (only 20.8% of stomachs contained prey). Ovulation and mating occur chiefly in the late dry-season (beginning around September), and most egg-laying takes place in the early to middle wet-season (November–January). Females can lay multiple clutches per year, some of which may be fertilised with stored sperm. Free-ranging L. burtonis are sedentary ambush foragers, with radio-tracked lizards moving on average < 5 m/day. Most foraging is done diurnally, but lizards may be active at any time of day or night. Radiotracked lizards were usually found in leaf-litter microhabitats, a preference that was also evident in habitat-choice experiments using field enclosures. Lizards typically buried themselves in 6–8 cm of litter; at this depth, they detect potential prey items while staying hidden from predators and prey and avoiding lethally high temperatures.
    [Show full text]
  • An Intial Estimation of the Numbers and Identification of Extant Non
    Answers Research Journal 8 (2015):171–186. www.answersingenesis.org/arj/v8/lizard-kinds-order-squamata.pdf $Q,QLWLDO(VWLPDWLRQRIWKH1XPEHUVDQG,GHQWLÀFDWLRQRI Extant Non-Snake/Non-Amphisbaenian Lizard Kinds: Order Squamata Tom Hennigan, Truett-McConnell College, Cleveland, Georgia. $EVWUDFW %LRV\VWHPDWLFVLVLQJUHDWÁX[WRGD\EHFDXVHRIWKHSOHWKRUDRIJHQHWLFUHVHDUFKZKLFKFRQWLQXDOO\ UHGHÀQHVKRZZHSHUFHLYHUHODWLRQVKLSVEHWZHHQRUJDQLVPV'HVSLWHWKHODUJHDPRXQWRIGDWDEHLQJ SXEOLVKHGWKHFKDOOHQJHLVKDYLQJHQRXJKNQRZOHGJHDERXWJHQHWLFVWRGUDZFRQFOXVLRQVUHJDUGLQJ WKHELRORJLFDOKLVWRU\RIRUJDQLVPVDQGWKHLUWD[RQRP\&RQVHTXHQWO\WKHELRV\VWHPDWLFVIRUPRVWWD[D LVLQJUHDWIOX[DQGQRWZLWKRXWFRQWURYHUV\E\SUDFWLWLRQHUVLQWKHILHOG7KHUHIRUHWKLVSUHOLPLQDU\SDSHU LVmeant to produce a current summary of lizard systematics, as it is understood today. It is meant to lay a JURXQGZRUNIRUFUHDWLRQV\VWHPDWLFVZLWKWKHJRDORIHVWLPDWLQJWKHQXPEHURIEDUDPLQVEURXJKWRQ WKH $UN %DVHG RQ WKH DQDO\VHV RI FXUUHQW PROHFXODU GDWD WD[RQRP\ K\EULGL]DWLRQ FDSDELOLW\ DQG VWDWLVWLFDO EDUDPLQRORJ\ RI H[WDQW RUJDQLVPV D WHQWDWLYH HVWLPDWH RI H[WDQW QRQVQDNH QRQ DPSKLVEDHQLDQOL]DUGNLQGVZHUHWDNHQRQERDUGWKH$UN,WLVKRSHGWKDWWKLVSDSHUZLOOHQFRXUDJH IXWXUHUHVHDUFKLQWRFUHDWLRQLVWELRV\VWHPDWLFV Keywords: $UN(QFRXQWHUELRV\VWHPDWLFVWD[RQRP\UHSWLOHVVTXDPDWDNLQGEDUDPLQRORJ\OL]DUG ,QWURGXFWLRQ today may change tomorrow, depending on the data Creation research is guided by God’s Word, which and assumptions about that data. For example, LVIRXQGDWLRQDOWRWKHVFLHQWLÀFPRGHOVWKDWDUHEXLOW naturalists assume randomness and universal 7KHELEOLFDODQGVFLHQWLÀFFKDOOHQJHLVWRLQYHVWLJDWH
    [Show full text]
  • Crocodile Geckos Or Other Pets, Visit ©2013 Petsmart Store Support Group, Inc
    SHOPPING LIST CROCODILE Step 1: Terrarium The standard for pet care 20-gallon (20-24" tall) or larger terrarium GECKO The Vet Assured Program includes: Screen lid, if not included with habitat Tarentola mauritanica • Specific standards our vendors agree to meet in caring for and observing pets for Step 2: Decor EXPERIENCE LEVEL: INTERMediate common illnesses. Reptile bark or calcium sand substrate • Specific standards for in-store pet care. Artificial/natural rock or wood hiding spot • The PetSmart Promise: If your pet becomes ill and basking site during the initial 14-day period, or if you’re not satisfied for any reason, PetSmart will gladly Branches for climbing and hiding replace the pet or refund the purchase price. Water dishes HEALTH Step 3: Care New surroundings and environments can be Heating and Lighting stressful for pets. Prior to handling your pet, give Reptile habitat thermometers (2) them 3-4 days to adjust to their new surroundings Ceramic heat emitter and fixture or nighttime while monitoring their behavior for any signs of bulb, if necessary stress or illness. Shortly after purchase, have a Lifespan: Approximately 8 years veterinarian familiar with reptiles examine your pet. Reptile habitat hygrometer (humidity gauge) PetSmart recommends that all pets visit a qualified Basking spot bulb and fixture Size: Up to 6” (15 cm) long veterinarian annually for a health exam. Lamp stand for UV and basking bulbs, Habitat: Temperate/Arboreal Environment if desired THINGS TO WATCH FOR Timer for light and heat bulbs, if desired •
    [Show full text]
  • Cretaceous Fossil Gecko Hand Reveals a Strikingly Modern Scansorial Morphology: Qualitative and Biometric Analysis of an Amber-Preserved Lizard Hand
    Cretaceous Research 84 (2018) 120e133 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cretaceous Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes Cretaceous fossil gecko hand reveals a strikingly modern scansorial morphology: Qualitative and biometric analysis of an amber-preserved lizard hand * Gabriela Fontanarrosa a, Juan D. Daza b, Virginia Abdala a, c, a Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical, CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucuman, Argentina b Department of Biological Sciences, Sam Houston State University, 1900 Avenue I, Lee Drain Building Suite 300, Huntsville, TX 77341, USA c Catedra de Biología General, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Tucuman, Argentina article info abstract Article history: Gekkota (geckos and pygopodids) is a clade thought to have originated in the Early Cretaceous and that Received 16 May 2017 today exhibits one of the most remarkable scansorial capabilities among lizards. Little information is Received in revised form available regarding the origin of scansoriality, which subsequently became widespread and diverse in 15 September 2017 terms of ecomorphology in this clade. An undescribed amber fossil (MCZ Re190835) from mid- Accepted in revised form 2 November 2017 Cretaceous outcrops of the north of Myanmar dated at 99 Ma, previously assigned to stem Gekkota, Available online 14 November 2017 preserves carpal, metacarpal and phalangeal bones, as well as supplementary climbing structures, such as adhesive pads and paraphalangeal elements. This fossil documents the presence of highly specialized Keywords: Squamata paleobiology adaptive structures. Here, we analyze in detail the manus of the putative stem Gekkota. We use Paraphalanges morphological comparisons in the context of extant squamates, to produce a detailed descriptive analysis Hand evolution and a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) based on 32 skeletal variables of the manus.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Type Catalogue of the Dragon Lizards (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae) in the Collection of the Western Australian Museum Ryan J
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 34 115–132 (2019) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.34(2).2019.115-132 An annotated type catalogue of the dragon lizards (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae) in the collection of the Western Australian Museum Ryan J. Ellis Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia. Biologic Environmental Survey, 24–26 Wickham St, East Perth, Western Australia 6004, Australia. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT – The Western Australian Museum holds a vast collection of specimens representing a large portion of the 106 currently recognised taxa of dragon lizards (family Agamidae) known to occur across Australia. While the museum’s collection is dominated by Western Australian species, it also contains a selection of specimens from localities in other Australian states and a small selection from outside of Australia. Currently the museum’s collection contains 18,914 agamid specimens representing 89 of the 106 currently recognised taxa from across Australia and 27 from outside of Australia. This includes 824 type specimens representing 45 currently recognised taxa and three synonymised taxa, comprising 43 holotypes, three syntypes and 779 paratypes. Of the paratypes, a total of 43 specimens have been gifted to other collections, disposed or could not be located and are considered lost. An annotated catalogue is provided for all agamid type material currently and previously maintained in the herpetological collection of the Western Australian Museum. KEYWORDS: type specimens, holotype, syntype, paratype, dragon lizard, nomenclature. INTRODUCTION Australia was named by John Edward Gray in 1825, The Agamidae, commonly referred to as dragon Clamydosaurus kingii Gray, 1825 [now Chlamydosaurus lizards, comprises over 480 taxa worldwide, occurring kingii (Gray, 1825)].
    [Show full text]
  • E-Program DO NOT PRINT!
    e-program DO NOT PRINT! You’ll receive a pocket program at registration, so no need to print this one. This e-program includes all presentation sessions and the associated abstracts, which are hyperlinked to the name of the presenter. Plenary abstracts are included in the pocket program. The plan on a page Tuesday June 20 Wednesday June 21 Thursday June 22 Friday June 23 7:30-8:30 am Breakfast: 7:30-8:30am Breakfast: 7:30-8:30am Breakfast: Dining Hall Dining Hall Dining Hall 8:50-10:00am Plenary: 8:50-10:00am Plenary: 8:50-10:00am Plenary: Rick Sabrina Fossette-Halot - Renee Catullo - Chapel. Shine - Chapel. Introduced Chapel. Introduced by Nicki Introduced by Scott Keogh by Ben Philips Mitchell 10:00-10:25 am Tea break 10:00-10:15am Tea break 10:00-10:25am Tea break 10:30-11:54am Short 10:20am -12:00pm Mike Bull 10:30-11:42am Short Talks: Talks: Session 1 - Symposium - Chapel Session 8 - Clubhouse: Clubhouse: upstairs and upstairs and downstairs downstairs 11:45 Conference close (upstairs) 12:00-2:00pm Lunch 12:00-1:00pm Conference 12:00-1:00pm Lunch: Dining (Dining Hall) and ASH photo and lunch Hall or Grab and Go, buses AGM (Clubhouse upstairs) depart for airport from midday High ropes course and 1:00-2:00pm Short Talks: climbing wall open. Book at Session 5 - Clubhouse: registration on Tuesday if upstairs and downstairs interested 2:00 -4:00pm 2:00-3:00pm Speed talks: 2:00-3:00pm Speed talks: Registration, locate Session 2 Clubhouse Session 6 Clubhouse accommodation, light upstairs upstairs fires, load talks, book activities 3:00-3:25pm
    [Show full text]
  • The Reptile Collection of the Museu De Zoologia, Pecies
    Check List 9(2): 257–262, 2013 © 2013 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution The Reptile Collection of the Museu de Zoologia, PECIES S Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brazil OF Breno Hamdan 1,2*, Daniela Pinto Coelho 1 1, Eduardo José dos Reis Dias3 ISTS 1 L and Rejâne Maria Lira-da-Silva , Annelise Batista D’Angiolella 40170-115, Salvador, BA, Brazil. 1 Universidade Federal da Bahia, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Núcleo Regional de Ofiologia e Animais Peçonhentos. CEP Sala A0-92 (subsolo), Laboratório de Répteis, Ilha do Fundão, Av. Carlos Chagas Filho, N° 373. CEP 21941-902. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. 2 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zoologia, Museu Nacional/UFRJ. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Bloco A, Carvalho. CEP 49500-000. Itabaian, SE, Brazil. * 3 CorrUniversidadeesponding Federal author. de E-mail: Sergipe, [email protected] Departamento de Biociências, Laboratório de Biologia e Ecologia de Vertebrados (LABEV), Campus Alberto de Abstract: to its history. The Reptile Collection of the Museu de Zoologia from Universidade Federal da Bahia (CRMZUFBA) has 5,206 specimens and Brazilian 185 species scientific (13 collections endemic to represent Brazil and an 9important threatened) sample with of one the quarter country’s of biodiversitythe known reptile and are species a testament listed in Brazil, from over 175 municipalities. Although the CRMZUFBA houses species from all Brazilian biomes there is a strong regional presence. Knowledge of the species housed in smaller collections could avoid unrepresentative species descriptions and provide information concerning intraspecific variation, ecological features and geographic coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Conservation Action Plans for Mongolian Reptiles and Amphibians
    Summary Conservation Action Plans for Mongolian Reptiles and Amphibians Compiled by Terbish, Kh., Munkhbayar, Kh., Clark, E.L., Munkhbat, J. and Monks, E.M. Edited by Munkhbaatar, M., Baillie, J.E.M., Borkin, L., Batsaikhan, N., Samiya, R. and Semenov, D.V. ERSITY O IV F N E U D U E T C A A T T S I O E N H T M ONGOLIA THE WORLD BANK i ii This publication has been funded by the World Bank’s Netherlands-Mongolia Trust Fund for Environmental Reform. The fi ndings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily refl ect the views of the Executive Directors of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colours, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgement on the part of the World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. The World Conservation Union (IUCN) have contributed to the production of the Summary Conservation Action Plans for Mongolian Reptiles and Amphibians, providing technical support, staff time, and data. IUCN supports the production of the Summary Conservation Action Plans for Mongolian Reptiles and Amphibians, but the information contained in this document does not necessarily represent the views of IUCN. Published by: Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London, NW1 4RY Copyright: © Zoological Society of London and contributors 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonn Zoological Bulletin Volume 57 Issue 2 Pp
    © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zoologicalbulletin.de; www.biologiezentrum.at Bonn zoological Bulletin Volume 57 Issue 2 pp. 329-345 Bonn, November 2010 A brief history of Greek herpetology Panayiotis Pafilis >- 2 •Section of Zoology and Marine Biology, Department of Biology, University of Athens, Panepistimioupolis, Ilissia 157-84, Athens, Greece : School of Natural Resources & Environment, Dana Building, 430 E. University, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI - 48109, USA; E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract. The development of Herpetology in Greece is examined in this paper. After a brief look at the first reports on amphibians and reptiles from antiquity, a short presentation of their deep impact on classical Greek civilization but also on present day traditions is attempted. The main part of the study is dedicated to the presentation of the major herpetol- ogists that studied Greek herpetofauna during the last two centuries through a division into Schools according to researchers' origin. Trends in herpetological research and changes in the anthropogeography of herpetologists are also discussed. Last- ly the future tasks of Greek herpetology are presented. Climate, geological history, geographic position and the long human presence in the area are responsible for shaping the particular features of Greek herpetofauna. Around 15% of the Greek herpetofauna comprises endemic species while 16% represent the only European populations in their range. THE STUDY OF REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS IN ANTIQUITY Greeks from quite early started to describe the natural en- Therein one could find citations to the Greek herpetofauna vironment. At the time biological sciences were consid- such as the Seriphian frogs or the tortoises of Arcadia.
    [Show full text]