DOCSLIB.ORG

Rare Lichens Rare Lichens

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rare Lichens Rare Lichens BLM Salem Office - Northwest Oregon District RareRare LichensLichens ofof OregonOregon RonaldRonald L.L. ExeterExeter • CharityCharity GladeGlade • ScotScot LoringLoring Rare Lichens of Oregon Teloschistes flavicans Rare Lichens of Oregon Ronald L. Exeter, Charity Glade, and Scot Loring United States Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management Salem District 1717 Fabry Road SE Salem, Oregon 97306 October 2016 ISBN – 13: 978-0-9791310-6-6 ISBN – 10: 0-979-1310-6-5 Authors: Ronald L. Exeter is a botanist for the Marys Peak Field Office. Salem District Bureau of Land Management. 1717 Fabry Road SE Salem, Oregon 97306 [email protected] Charity Glade is a Northwest Lichenologist and botanical consultant. Blue Glade Consulting Salem, Oregon [email protected] Scot Loring is the owner of Pacific Crest Consulting, LLC, an environmental consulting company. 935 Bellview Avenue Ashland, Oregon 97520 [email protected] Initial design: Maxwell R. Ratkai, Letter 13 Creative Layout, improvements, formatting: Maxwell R. Ratkai, Letter 13 Creative Frontispiece: Debra J. Rice Front cover: Umbilicaria phaea var. coccinea, photo by Scot Loring - i - Rare Lichens of Oregon Suggested reference for citing: Exeter, Ronald L., Charity Glade, and Scot Loring. 2016. Rare Lichens of Oregon. Salem District, Bureau of Land Management, Salem, Oregon. 195 p. Abstract. This Bureau of Land Management publication provides species-specific information on 78 special status lichen species included in the 2016 publication of Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon by the Oregon Biodiversity Information Center (ORBIC). Additionally, Leptogium compactum is included and considered rare in Oregon. Individual treatments include synonyms, common names, field summaries, diagnostic characters, species descriptions, ecologies, distributions, similar species, and county distribution maps. Also included are species distribution maps by Oregon counties and over 290 photos and drawings. This publication in available from the Salem Bureau of Land Management, located in Salem, Oregon, USA. Key words: BLM, Bureau of Land Management, rare, endangered, lichen, Oregon, ORBIC. - ii - Rare Lichens of Oregon Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank the Bureau of Land Management Oregon State Office and Salem District, Marys Peak Field Office for funding and supporting this project. Specifically we would like to thank Rob Huff for funding, support, edits and suggestions; Darci Pankratz, Amanda Hardman and John Christy for support in determining species distributions and Stefanie Larew for text consultation and quickly solving formatting issues. Special thanks to Deborah Harnke and the BLM Reference Library at the National Operations Center. This document could not have been compiled without their assistance in supplying ‘piles’ of requested journal articles. We would like to thank: Steve Sheehy for his assistance in relocating Oregon’s lone Heterodermia speciosa site and lending a specimen for examination; Steve Selva for loaning specimens of Chaenothecopsis rubescens; Steve Sharnoff for permission to use his photos; Bruce McCune for technical assistance and providing specimens for study and photography; Daphne Stone and Amanda Hardman for technical assistance and providing photos; Eric Peterson for providing photos and line drawings; Alexander Mikulin for line drawings; Ann DeBolt for support; Oregon State University Herbarium for lending specimens and providing vouchers for examination and photography; United States Forest Service (USFS), Linda Geiser, and Doug Glavich for assistance in locating and providing line drawings for inclusion into this publication; Michael Hamel, Stephen Morse, and the Portland, Oregon USFS Government Printing Office for scanning artwork, line drawings, and publication support. Photo Credits: All photos by Scot Loring with the following exceptions: Amanda Hardman, Chaenotheca balsamconensis Stephen Sharnoff, Gyalolechia stantonii, Hypotrachyna revoluta, and Thelomma mammosum Daphne Stone, Vezdaea stipitata Ron Exeter, Chaenothecopsis rubescens, Sclerophora peronella (b, c, d), Pilophorus (d, e), photobionts Eric Peterson, Chaenothecopsis vainioana Drawings: Alexander Mikulin: Buellia oidalea, Calicium abietinum, Calicium adspersum, Collema curtisporum, C. nigrescens, Leioderma sorediatum, Lobaria linita, Nephroma occultum, Niebla cephalota, Pannaria rubiginosa, Pilophorus nigricaulis, Pseudocyphellaria rainierensis, Pyrrhospora quernea, Ramalina pollinaria, Sticta arctica, Teloschistes flavicans, Tholurna dissimilis, Usnea hesperina. Eric Peterson: edit of Pyrrhospora quernea. - iii - Color Bar Key Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................Page 100 Macrolichens ...................................................................................................................................................Page 700 Microlichens ....................................................................................................................................................Page 125 Distribution Maps ..........................................................................................................................................Page 170 Abbreviations & Symbols ..............................................................................................................................Page 177 Photobionts .....................................................................................................................................................Page 178 References ........................................................................................................................................................Page 180 - iv - Table of Contents Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................................................1 Macrolichens .........................................................................................................................................................................................7 Anaptychia crinalis (Schleicher) Vĕzda ............................................................................................................................8 Bryoria bicolor (Ehrhart) Brodo and D. Hawksworth ............................................................................................... 10 Cetraria subalpina Imshaug ............................................................................................................................................ 12 Circinaria rogeri (Sohrabi) Sohrabi ................................................................................................................................ 14 Cladonia concinna Ahti and Goward ............................................................................................................................ 16 Cladonia poroscypha S. Hammer ................................................................................................................................... 18 Cladonia prolifica S. Hammer and Ahti ........................................................................................................................ 20 Collema curtisporum Degelius ........................................................................................................................................ 22 Collema quadrifidum D.F. Stone and McCune. ........................................................................................................... 24 Collema undulatum var. granulosum Degelius ............................................................................................................ 26 Dermatocarpon polyphyllizum (Nylander) Blomberg and Forssell ......................................................................... 28 Ephebe solida Bornet ......................................................................................................................................................... 30 Fuscopannaria laceratula (Hue) P.M. Jørgensen ......................................................................................................... 32 Heterodermia japonica (M. Satô) Swinscow and Krog .............................................................................................. 34 Heterodermia sitchensis Goward and Noble................................................................................................................. 36 Heterodermia speciosa (Wulfen) Trevis ......................................................................................................................... 38 Hypogymnia pulverata (Nylander) Elix ........................................................................................................................ 40 Hypogymnia subphysodes (Krempelhuber) Filson ..................................................................................................... 42 Hypotrachyna revoluta (Flörke) Hale ............................................................................................................................ 44 Hypotrachyna riparia McCune ....................................................................................................................................... 46 Leioderma sorediatum D. Galloway and P.M. Jørgensen ..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phylogeny of the Cetrarioid Core (Parmeliaceae) Based on Five
    The Lichenologist 41(5): 489–511 (2009) © 2009 British Lichen Society doi:10.1017/S0024282909990090 Printed in the United Kingdom Phylogeny of the cetrarioid core (Parmeliaceae) based on five genetic markers Arne THELL, Filip HÖGNABBA, John A. ELIX, Tassilo FEUERER, Ingvar KÄRNEFELT, Leena MYLLYS, Tiina RANDLANE, Andres SAAG, Soili STENROOS, Teuvo AHTI and Mark R. D. SEAWARD Abstract: Fourteen genera belong to a monophyletic core of cetrarioid lichens, Ahtiana, Allocetraria, Arctocetraria, Cetraria, Cetrariella, Cetreliopsis, Flavocetraria, Kaernefeltia, Masonhalea, Nephromopsis, Tuckermanella, Tuckermannopsis, Usnocetraria and Vulpicida. A total of 71 samples representing 65 species (of 90 worldwide) and all type species of the genera are included in phylogentic analyses based on a complete ITS matrix and incomplete sets of group I intron, -tubulin, GAPDH and mtSSU sequences. Eleven of the species included in the study are analysed phylogenetically for the first time, and of the 178 sequences, 67 are newly constructed. Two phylogenetic trees, one based solely on the complete ITS-matrix and a second based on total information, are similar, but not entirely identical. About half of the species are gathered in a strongly supported clade composed of the genera Allocetraria, Cetraria s. str., Cetrariella and Vulpicida. Arctocetraria, Cetreliopsis, Kaernefeltia and Tuckermanella are monophyletic genera, whereas Cetraria, Flavocetraria and Tuckermannopsis are polyphyletic. The taxonomy in current use is compared with the phylogenetic results, and future, probable or potential adjustments to the phylogeny are discussed. The single non-DNA character with a strong correlation to phylogeny based on DNA-sequences is conidial shape. The secondary chemistry of the poorly known species Cetraria annae is analyzed for the first time; the cortex contains usnic acid and atranorin, whereas isonephrosterinic, nephrosterinic, lichesterinic, protolichesterinic and squamatic acids occur in the medulla.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Calicioid Lichens and Fungi for Genera with Members in Temperate Western North America Draft: 2012-03-13
    Draft: 2012-03-13 Checklist of Calicioids – E. B. Peterson Checklist of Calicioid Lichens and Fungi For Genera with Members in Temperate Western North America Draft: 2012-03-13 by E. B. Peterson Calicium abietinum, EBP#4640 1 Draft: 2012-03-13 Checklist of Calicioids – E. B. Peterson Genera Acroscyphus Lév. Brucea Rikkinen Calicium Pers. Chaenotheca Th. Fr. Chaenothecopsis Vainio Coniocybe Ach. = Chaenotheca "Cryptocalicium" – potentially undescribed genus; taxonomic placement is not known but there are resemblances both to Mycocaliciales and Onygenales Cybebe Tibell = Chaenotheca Cyphelium Ach. Microcalicium Vainio Mycocalicium Vainio Phaeocalicium A.F.W. Schmidt Sclerophora Chevall. Sphinctrina Fr. Stenocybe (Nyl.) Körber Texosporium Nádv. ex Tibell & Hofsten Thelomma A. Massal. Tholurna Norman Additional genera are primarily tropical, such as Pyrgillus, Tylophoron About the Species lists Names in bold are believed to be currently valid names. Old synonyms are indented and listed with the current name following (additional synonyms can be found in Esslinger (2011). Names in quotes are nicknames for undescribed species. Names given within tildes (~) are published, but may not be validly published. Underlined species are included in the checklist for North America north of Mexico (Esslinger 2011). Names are given with authorities and original citation date where possible, followed by a colon. Additional citations are given after the colon, followed by a series of abbreviations for states and regions where known. States and provinces use the standard two-letter abbreviation. Regions include: NAm = North America; WNA = western North America (west of the continental divide); Klam = Klamath Region (my home territory). For those not known from North America, continental distribution may be given: SAm = South America; EUR = Europe; ASIA = Asia; Afr = Africa; Aus = Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTAÇÃO Lidiane Alves Dos Santos.Pdf
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE PERNAMBUCO CENTRO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE MICOLOGIA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM BIOLOGIA DE FUNGOS LIDIANE ALVES DOS SANTOS RELAÇÕES FILOGENÉTICAS DOS GÊNEROS LECANORA ACH. E NEOPROTOPARMELIA GARIMA SINGH, LUMBSCH & I. SCHIMITT (LECANORALES, ASCOMYCOTA LIQUENIZADOS) Recife 2019 LIDIANE ALVES DOS SANTOS RELAÇÕES FILOGENÉTICAS DOS GÊNEROS LECANORA ACH. E NEOPROTOPARMELIA GARIMA SINGH, LUMBSCH & I. SCHIMITT (LECANORALES, ASCOMYCOTA LIQUENIZADOS) Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em Biologia de Fungos do Departamento de Micologia do Centro de Biociências da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, como parte dos requisitos para a obtenção do título de Mestre em Biologia de Fungos. Área de Concentração: Micologia Básica Orientadora: Profª. Dra. Marcela Eugenia da Silva Caceres. Coorientador: Dr. Robert Lücking. Recife 2019 Catalogação na fonte Elaine C Barroso (CRB4/1728) Santos, Lidiane Alves dos Relações filogenéticas dos gêneros Lecanora Ach. e Neoprotoparmelia Garima Singh, Lumbsch & I. Schimitt (Lecanorales, Ascomycota Liquenizados) / Lidiane Alves dos Santos- 2019. 52 folhas: il., fig., tab. Orientadora: Marcela Eugênia da Silva Cáceres Coorientador: Robert Lücking Dissertação (mestrado) – Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Centro de Biociências. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia de Fungos. Recife, 2019. Inclui referências 1. Fungos liquenizados 2. Filogenia 3. Metabólitos secundários I. Cáceres, Marcela Eugênia da Silva (orient.) II. Lücking, Robert (coorient.) III. Título 579.5 CDD (22.ed.) UFPE/CB-2019-312 LIDIANE ALVES DOS SANTOS RELAÇÕES FILOGENÉTICAS DOS GÊNEROS LECANORA ACH. E NEOPROTOPARMELIA GARIMA SINGH, LUMBSCH & I. SCHIMITT (LECANORALES, ASCOMYCOTA LIQUENIZADOS) Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em Biologia de Fungos do Departamento de Micologia do Centro de Biociências da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, como parte dos requisitos para a obtenção do título de Mestre em Biologia de Fungos.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation
    Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation Establishment of the 95-foot wide construction corridor and TEWAs would likely remove individuals of H. caeruleus and modify microclimate conditions around individuals that are not removed. The removal of forests and host trees and disturbance to soil could negatively affect H. caeruleus in adjacent areas by removing its habitat, disturbing the roots of host trees, and affecting its mycorrhizal association with the trees, potentially affecting site persistence. Restored portions of the corridor and TEWAs would be dominated by early seral vegetation for approximately 30 years, which would result in long-term changes to habitat conditions. A 30-foot wide portion of the corridor would be maintained in low-growing vegetation for pipeline maintenance and would not provide habitat for the species during the life of the project. Hygrophorus caeruleus is not likely to persist at one of the sites in the project area because of the extent of impacts and the proximity of the recorded observation to the corridor. Hygrophorus caeruleus is likely to persist at the remaining three sites in the project area (MP 168.8 and MP 172.4 (north), and MP 172.5-172.7) because the majority of observations within the sites are more than 90 feet from the corridor, where direct effects are not anticipated and indirect effects are unlikely. The site at MP 168.8 is in a forested area on an east-facing slope, and a paved road occurs through the southeast part of the site. Four out of five observations are more than 90 feet southwest of the corridor and are not likely to be directly or indirectly affected by the PCGP Project based on the distance from the corridor, extent of forests surrounding the observations, and proximity to an existing open corridor (the road), indicating the species is likely resilient to edge- related effects at the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Thi Thu Tram NGUYEN
    ANNÉE 2014 THÈSE / UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1 sous le sceau de l’Université Européenne de Bretagne pour le grade de DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1 Mention : Chimie Ecole doctorale Sciences De La Matière Thi Thu Tram NGUYEN Préparée dans l’unité de recherche UMR CNRS 6226 Equipe PNSCM (Produits Naturels Synthèses Chimie Médicinale) (Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Rennes 1) Screening of Thèse soutenue à Rennes le 19 décembre 2014 mycosporine-like devant le jury composé de : compounds in the Marie-Dominique GALIBERT Professeur à l’Université de Rennes 1 / Examinateur Dermatocarpon genus. Holger THÜS Conservateur au Natural History Museum Londres / Phytochemical study Rapporteur Erwan AR GALL of the lichen Maître de conférences à l’Université de Bretagne Occidentale / Rapporteur Dermatocarpon luridum Kim Phi Phung NGUYEN Professeur à l’Université des sciences naturelles (With.) J.R. Laundon. d’Hô-Chi-Minh-Ville Vietnam / Examinateur Marylène CHOLLET-KRUGLER Maître de conférences à l’Université de Rennes1 / Co-directeur de thèse Joël BOUSTIE Professeur à l’Université de Rennes 1 / Directeur de thèse Remerciements En premier lieu, je tiens à remercier Monsieur le Dr Holger Thüs et Monsieur le Dr Erwan Ar Gall d’avoir accepté d’être les rapporteurs de mon manuscrit, ainsi que Madame la Professeure Marie-Dominique Galibert d’avoir accepté de participer à ce jury de thèse. J’exprime toute ma gratitude au Dr Marylène Chollet-Krugler pour avoir guidé mes pas dès les premiers jours et tout au long de ces trois années. Je la remercie particulièrement pour sa disponibilité et sa grande gentillesse, son écoute et sa patience.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichen Functional Trait Variation Along an East-West Climatic Gradient in Oregon and Among Habitats in Katmai National Park, Alaska
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Kaleigh Spickerman for the degree of Master of Science in Botany and Plant Pathology presented on June 11, 2015 Title: Lichen Functional Trait Variation Along an East-West Climatic Gradient in Oregon and Among Habitats in Katmai National Park, Alaska Abstract approved: ______________________________________________________ Bruce McCune Functional traits of vascular plants have been an important component of ecological studies for a number of years; however, in more recent times vascular plant ecologists have begun to formalize a set of key traits and universal system of trait measurement. Many recent studies hypothesize global generality of trait patterns, which would allow for comparison among ecosystems and biomes and provide a foundation for general rules and theories, the so-called “Holy Grail” of ecology. However, the majority of these studies focus on functional trait patterns of vascular plants, with a minority examining the patterns of cryptograms such as lichens. Lichens are an important component of many ecosystems due to their contributions to biodiversity and their key ecosystem services, such as contributions to mineral and hydrological cycles and ecosystem food webs. Lichens are also of special interest because of their reliance on atmospheric deposition for nutrients and water, which makes them particularly sensitive to air pollution. Therefore, they are often used as bioindicators of air pollution, climate change, and general ecosystem health. This thesis examines the functional trait patterns of lichens in two contrasting regions with fundamentally different kinds of data. To better understand the patterns of lichen functional traits, we examined reproductive, morphological, and chemical trait variation along precipitation and temperature gradients in Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • BLS Bulletin 111 Winter 2012.Pdf
    1 BRITISH LICHEN SOCIETY OFFICERS AND CONTACTS 2012 PRESIDENT B.P. Hilton, Beauregard, 5 Alscott Gardens, Alverdiscott, Barnstaple, Devon EX31 3QJ; e-mail [email protected] VICE-PRESIDENT J. Simkin, 41 North Road, Ponteland, Newcastle upon Tyne NE20 9UN, email [email protected] SECRETARY C. Ellis, Royal Botanic Garden, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH3 5LR; email [email protected] TREASURER J.F. Skinner, 28 Parkanaur Avenue, Southend-on-Sea, Essex SS1 3HY, email [email protected] ASSISTANT TREASURER AND MEMBERSHIP SECRETARY H. Döring, Mycology Section, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, email [email protected] REGIONAL TREASURER (Americas) J.W. Hinds, 254 Forest Avenue, Orono, Maine 04473-3202, USA; email [email protected]. CHAIR OF THE DATA COMMITTEE D.J. Hill, Yew Tree Cottage, Yew Tree Lane, Compton Martin, Bristol BS40 6JS, email [email protected] MAPPING RECORDER AND ARCHIVIST M.R.D. Seaward, Department of Archaeological, Geographical & Environmental Sciences, University of Bradford, West Yorkshire BD7 1DP, email [email protected] DATA MANAGER J. Simkin, 41 North Road, Ponteland, Newcastle upon Tyne NE20 9UN, email [email protected] SENIOR EDITOR (LICHENOLOGIST) P.D. Crittenden, School of Life Science, The University, Nottingham NG7 2RD, email [email protected] BULLETIN EDITOR P.F. Cannon, CABI and Royal Botanic Gardens Kew; postal address Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, email [email protected] CHAIR OF CONSERVATION COMMITTEE & CONSERVATION OFFICER B.W. Edwards, DERC, Library Headquarters, Colliton Park, Dorchester, Dorset DT1 1XJ, email [email protected] CHAIR OF THE EDUCATION AND PROMOTION COMMITTEE: S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska
    The Lichenologist (2020), 52,61–181 doi:10.1017/S0024282920000079 Standard Paper Lichens and associated fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska Toby Spribille1,2,3 , Alan M. Fryday4 , Sergio Pérez-Ortega5 , Måns Svensson6, Tor Tønsberg7, Stefan Ekman6 , Håkon Holien8,9, Philipp Resl10 , Kevin Schneider11, Edith Stabentheiner2, Holger Thüs12,13 , Jan Vondrák14,15 and Lewis Sharman16 1Department of Biological Sciences, CW405, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada; 2Department of Plant Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria; 3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA; 4Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; 5Real Jardín Botánico (CSIC), Departamento de Micología, Calle Claudio Moyano 1, E-28014 Madrid, Spain; 6Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden; 7Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen Allégt. 41, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway; 8Faculty of Bioscience and Aquaculture, Nord University, Box 2501, NO-7729 Steinkjer, Norway; 9NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; 10Faculty of Biology, Department I, Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; 11Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; 12Botany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany; 13Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; 14Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic; 15Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic and 16Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy of Bryoria Section Implexae (Parmeliaceae, Lecanoromycetes) in North America and Europe, Based on Chemical, Morphological and Molecular Data
    Ann. Bot. Fennici 51: 345–371 ISSN 0003-3847 (print) ISSN 1797-2442 (online) Helsinki 22 September 2014 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2014 Taxonomy of Bryoria section Implexae (Parmeliaceae, Lecanoromycetes) in North America and Europe, based on chemical, morphological and molecular data Saara Velmala1,*, Leena Myllys1, Trevor Goward2, Håkon Holien3 & Pekka Halonen4 1) Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 7, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland (*corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected]) 2) UBC Herbarium, Beaty Museum, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada (mailing address: Enlichened Consulting Ltd., 5369 Clearwater Valley Road, Upper Clearwater, BC V0E 1N1, Canada) 3) Nord-Trøndelag University College, Serviceboks 2501, N-7729 Steinkjer, Norway 4) Botanical Museum, Department of Biology, P.O. Box 3000, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Finland Received 31 Jan. 2014, final version received 13 June 2014, accepted 18 June 2014 Velmala, S., Myllys, L., Goward, T., Holien, H. & Halonen, P. 2014: Taxonomy of Bryoria section Implexae (Parmeliaceae, Lecanoromycetes) in North America and Europe, based on chemical, morphological and molecular data. — Ann. Bot. Fennici 51: 345–371. Ninety-seven ingroup specimens of Bryoria section Implexae (Parmeliaceae, Leca- noromycetes) were studied using molecular, chemical, morphological and geographic characters. The molecular data included nuclear ribosomal markers (ITS, IGS) and the partial glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene. In addition to par- simony analyses, a haplotype network was constructed. Phylogenetic analyses strongly supported the monophyly of the section Implexae. The specimens were grouped into two monophyletic clades. Clade 1 encompassed all esorediate material from North America, whereas Clade 2 included both sorediate North American material and all European material.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Taxonomy and Diversification Events in the Caliciaceae
    Fungal Diversity DOI 10.1007/s13225-016-0372-y Phylogeny, taxonomy and diversification events in the Caliciaceae Maria Prieto1,2 & Mats Wedin1 Received: 21 December 2015 /Accepted: 19 July 2016 # The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Although the high degree of non-monophyly and Calicium pinicola, Calicium trachyliodes, Pseudothelomma parallel evolution has long been acknowledged within the occidentale, Pseudothelomma ocellatum and Thelomma mazaediate Caliciaceae (Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota), a brunneum. A key for the mazaedium-producing Caliciaceae is natural re-classification of the group has not yet been accom- included. plished. Here we constructed a multigene phylogeny of the Caliciaceae-Physciaceae clade in order to resolve the detailed Keywords Allocalicium gen. nov. Calicium fossil . relationships within the group, to propose a revised classification, Divergence time estimates . Lichens . Multigene . and to perform a dating study. The few characters present in the Pseudothelomma gen. nov available fossil and the complex character evolution of the group affects the interpretation of morphological traits and thus influ- ences the assignment of the fossil to specific nodes in the phy- Introduction logeny, when divergence time analyses are carried out. Alternative fossil assignments resulted in very different time es- Caliciaceae is one of several ascomycete groups characterized timates and the comparison with the analysis based on a second- by producing prototunicate (thin-walled and evanescent) asci ary calibration demonstrates that the most likely placement of the and a mazaedium (an accumulation of loose, maturing spores fossil is close to a terminal node rather than a basal placement in covering the ascoma surface).
    [Show full text]
  • Lichens and Allied Fungi of the Indiana Forest Alliance
    2017. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 126(2):129–152 LICHENS AND ALLIED FUNGI OF THE INDIANA FOREST ALLIANCE ECOBLITZ AREA, BROWN AND MONROE COUNTIES, INDIANA INCORPORATED INTO A REVISED CHECKLIST FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA James C. Lendemer: Institute of Systematic Botany, The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY 10458-5126 USA ABSTRACT. Based upon voucher collections, 108 lichen species are reported from the Indiana Forest Alliance Ecoblitz area, a 900 acre unit in Morgan-Monroe and Yellowwood State Forests, Brown and Monroe Counties, Indiana. The lichen biota of the study area was characterized as: i) dominated by species with green coccoid photobionts (80% of taxa); ii) comprised of 49% species that reproduce primarily with lichenized diaspores vs. 44% that reproduce primarily through sexual ascospores; iii) comprised of 65% crustose taxa, 29% foliose taxa, and 6% fruticose taxa; iv) one wherein many species are rare (e.g., 55% of species were collected fewer than three times) and fruticose lichens other than Cladonia were entirely absent; and v) one wherein cyanolichens were poorly represented, comprising only three species. Taxonomic diversity ranged from 21 to 56 species per site, with the lowest diversity sites concentrated in riparian corridors and the highest diversity sites on ridges. Low Gap Nature Preserve, located within the study area, was found to have comparable species richness to areas outside the nature preserve, although many species rare in the study area were found only outside preserve boundaries. Sets of rare species are delimited and discussed, as are observations as to the overall low abundance of lichens on corticolous substrates and the presence of many unhealthy foliose lichens on mature tree boles.
    [Show full text]
  • Opuscula Philolichenum, 6: 87-120. 2009
    Opuscula Philolichenum, 6: 87–120. 2009. Lichenicolous fungi and some lichens from the Holarctic 1 MIKHAIL P. ZHURBENKO ABSTRACT. – 102 species of lichenicolous fungi and 23 lichens are reported, mainly from the Russian Arctic. Four new taxa are described: Clypeococcum bisporum (on Cetraria and Flavocetraria), Echinodiscus kozhevnikovii (on Cetraria), Stigmidium hafellneri (on Flavocetraria) and Gypsoplaca macrophylla f. blastidiata. The following lichenicolous fungi are reported for the first time from North America: Monodictys fuliginosa, Stigmidium microcarpum and Trichosphaeria lichenum. The following lichenicolous fungi and lichens are reported as new to Asia: Arthonia almquistii, Arthophacopsis parmeliarum, Cercidospora lobothalliae, Clypeococcum placopsiphilum, Dactylospora cf. aeruginosa, D. frigida, Epicladonia sandstedei, Everniicola flexispora, Hypogymnia fistulosa, Lecanora luteovernalis, Lecanographa rinodinae, Lichenochora mediterraneae, Lichenopeltella peltigericola, Lichenopuccinia poeltii, Lichenosticta alcicornaria, Phoma cytospora, Polycoccum ventosicola, Roselliniopsis gelidaria, R. ventosa, Sclerococcum gelidarum, Scoliciosporum intrusum, Stigmidium croceae, S. mycobilimbiae, S. stygnospilum, S. superpositum, Taeniolella diederichiana, Thelocarpon impressellum and Zwackhiomyces macrosporus. Twenty-eight species are new to Russia, 15 new to the Arctic, five new to Mongolia and nine new to Alaska. Twenty lichen genera and 31 species are new hosts for various species of lichenicolous fungi. INTRODUCTION This paper deals
    [Show full text]