Southampton Archaeology Unit

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Southampton Archaeology Unit Southampton Archaeology Unit Report 1258 Desk-based assessment of the archaeological potential of land south of East Gomeldon Road, Gomeldon, Wiltshire. Dr AD Russel BA PhD MCIfA 2017 Client: Mr A Pool and Mr D Bowyer. 0 Southampton City Council Archaeology Unit: East Gomeldon Road DBA Contents 1. Summary ..................................................................................................... 2 2. Introduction .................................................................................................. 2 3. Aims of the Desk-based assessment ........................................................... 3 4. Assessment methodology ............................................................................ 3 5. Site location, topography and geology ......................................................... 3 6. Historical background .................................................................................. 4 7. Cartographic evidence ................................................................................. 5 8. Archaeological Evidence .............................................................................. 7 9. Scheduled monuments .............................................................................. 14 10. Historic Buildings ..................................................................................... 15 11. The present condition of the site .............................................................. 17 12. The proposals .......................................................................................... 17 13. Conclusions ............................................................................................. 18 14. Mitigation Strategy ................................................................................... 19 1 Southampton City Council Archaeology Unit: East Gomeldon Road DBA Desk-based assessment of the archaeological potential of land south of East Gomeldon Road, Gomeldon, Wiltshire. Dr AD Russel BA PhD MCIfA Archaeology Unit report 1258 Ordnance Survey grid reference 504010 135625 1. SUMMARY The Archaeology Unit of Southampton City Council was commissioned by Mr A Pool and Mr D Bowyer to draw up a desk-based assessment of the archaeological potential of some 2000sq m of land south of East Gomeldon Road in Gomeldon, Wiltshire. Archaeological sites of all periods lie in the vicinity of the site. No prehistoric settlements are known, but a cemetery of 13 Bronze Age burials lies to the southeast. It is unlikely that it extends as far as the present site. The location of the settlement that buried their dead here is not known, but Bronze Age sherds and flints have been found to the south of the present site, both on the valley floor and on the plain to its east. The Roman road from Salisbury to Silchester, known as The Portway runs in the bottom of the valley to the west of the site, a possible settlement/enclosure lies some 300m southwest of the site, and Romano-British pottery and box-tile fragments were found during the excavation of the Gomeldon deserted medieval village downslope from the site; the box tile, however, had been collected to use in a hearth and it may have come from further afield. The excavations at the medieval villages of Winterbourne Gunner to the south, and Gomeldon to the immediate west of the site were important archaeological discoveries and the Gomeldon site, now a Scheduled Monument with its extant house platforms and trackways, lies just down-slope from the present site, which partly borders on the scheduled area. The excavators concluded that there were no house platforms to the east of the main road across the settlement (that is in the area of the present site) but the plan of the earthworks shows a number of linear features heading towards the present site. Given the presence of sites of all periods in the vicinity of the site, and the surviving medieval village of Gomeldon to the west, just outside the site boundary, the archaeological potential of the site is considered to be High. Given the high potential for archaeological remains to survive on the site best practice would dictate that further information is obtained on the date and nature of the archaeology prior to construction, and any damage to the archaeology be mitigated. This could be achieved by a condition for a two-phase programme of archaeological work being placed on the planning permission; the first phase evaluation, and the second phase a programme of further work as required by the planning authority. 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 The Archaeology Unit of Southampton City Council was commissioned by Mr A Pool and Mr D Bowyer to draw up a desk-based assessment of the archaeological potential of some 00 acres of land at Gomeldon in Wiltshire (fig 1). 2.2 The site lies on the edge of the valley of the River Bourne, to the northeast of Salisbury. 2 Southampton City Council Archaeology Unit: East Gomeldon Road DBA 3. AIMS OF THE DESK -BASED ASSESSMENT 3.1 The aims of the assessment were to identify the likely scope of the area’s archaeological heritage and its sensitivity to development. This was to be achieved by characterising the archaeology of the site through all periods to the modern day, suggesting the likely range and locations of the archaeological evidence, and establishing areas where archaeology is unlikely to survive due to modern disturbance. 4. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 4.1 Wiltshire County Council provided details of nearby Heritage Assets, and the results of archaeological investigations in the area. Historic maps were consulted to gain a view of land use over the last 250 years. 5. SITE LOCATION , TOPOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY 5.1 The site (fig 1) is centred at Ordnance Survey Grid reference 504010 135625. Figure 1. The location of the site, marked by a red star. © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved Southampton City Council. LA 1000 19679 2016. 3 Southampton City Council Archaeology Unit: East Gomeldon Road DBA Figure 2. The site in September 2016. (Solent Surveys). 5.2 The site lies on the edge of the river valley which lies to the west of the site and slopes from c79m OD in the northeast corner to c73m OD to the south east corner and c77m OD in the west corner (fig 2). 5.3 The British Geological Survey records the bedrock geology as consisting of Seaford Chalk Formation - Chalk. Sedimentary Bedrock formed approximately 84 to 89 million years ago in the Cretaceous Period. (http://mapapps.bgs.ac.uk/geologyofbritain/ home.html). 5.4 The overlying soils are recorded as 343h Andover 1 a brown rendzina (Soil Survey of England and Wales, Sheet 6 South East England). 6. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Synthesised from: https://history.wiltshire.gov.uk/community/getcom.php?id=124 and Musty and Algar 1986. 6.1. Gomeldon lies within the parish of Idmiston. Gomeldon is derived from Gumela's Hill and the Saxon settlement was on the lower slopes of the Bourne Valley. There was substantial prehistoric settlement in this area with two large Neolithic flint mines at Easton Down and Martin's Clump, that were probably occupied for around 500 years. Bronze Age round barrows are a feature of the landscape while on Thorney Down there was a late Bronze Age farmhouse with eight outbuildings. There are several Bronze Age enclosures. During the Iron Age there were various small farms and these probably continued into the Romano-British period. On Roche Court Down there is an early 6th century Saxon cemetery with 17 graves with a further 18 graves of victims of a mass execution. It is most likely that settled Saxon occupation of the valley took place soon after this. By the early 10th century Glastonbury Abbey held 20 hides here, including the manor of Gomeldon, and Saxon burials have been found at Gomeldon. 4 Southampton City Council Archaeology Unit: East Gomeldon Road DBA 6.2 Gomeldon is not mentioned as such in the Domesday Book (1086) it is generally assumed that the 5-hide estate entered as Wintreburne is in fact Gomeldon. There were three distinct communities, Idmiston being the largest with about 70-75 people, then Gomeldon with 50 to 55 and in the middle, geographically, Porton with about 30 inhabitants. Idmiston had the most land, sufficient for seven plough teams, Gomeldon had land for three plough teams and Porton enough for two. All had meadow and pastureland but only Idmiston had woodland (10 acres). Both Gomeldon and Porton had water mills. The total population was between 150 and 160. Part of the deserted medieval village of Gomeldon, to the east of the river, has been excavated. It was originally sited on the lower slopes of Gomeldon Hill and in the early 12th century consisted of long houses, home to humans at one end and animals at the other. By the late 13th century/early 14th century the animals were housed in a separate building and the houses were reserved for humans. The houses were of unmortared flint and set on a village street, which remains as a hollow way. By the later medieval period the houses had moved further up the hillside and set on prepared platforms. The earliest existing building in the parish is the timber-framed Old Vicarage at Idmiston that dates from the early 15th century. It is likely that the settlement at Gomeldon was in decline by this time and in 1518 the mill is described as 'decayed' and there were only six households. 7. CARTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE 7.1 A brief overview of the known cartographic evidence from the late 18th century onwards follows. Andrews’ and Dury’s Map of Wiltshire, 1773, (Map 1) shows the site as fields. Later map from
Recommended publications
  • From Time Team to Archaeology for All
    From Time Team to Archaeology for All Dr Carenza Lewis University of Cambridge www.access.arch.cam.ac.uk www.access.arch.cam.ac.uk www.access.arch.cam.ac.uk Enhancing educational, economic and social well-being through active participation in archaeology. Higher Education Field Academy) Aim – To help widen participation in higher education through participation in archaeological excavation • Find out more about university • Contribute to university research • Develop confidence and deploy skills for life, learning and employment The first HEFA - Terrington 2005 “I really enjoyed it. The best bit was not knowing what we would find’ (NP) “It was hard work but I had a great time” (MS). “The kids were really enthusiastic, talking about it all the way home, asking questions…. It helps that they’re doing it themselves, not just watching” (SC) “All the students loved their experiences and are still talking about it! It was judged much ‘cooler’ than going to Alton Towers!” (EO). Coxwold Castleton Wiveton Binham Terrington St Hindringham Clement Gaywood Peakirk Acle Wisbech St Ufford Mary Castor Thorney Carleton Rode Sawtry Ramsey Isleham Garboldisham Chediston Houghton Willingham Cottenham Rampton Hessett Walberswick Riseley Swaffham Coddenham Girton Bulbeck Warnborough Great Long Sharnbrook Shelford Stapleford Bramford Shefford Melford Ashwell 2005 Pirton 2006 Manuden Thorrington Little Hallingbury 2007 West Mersea Mill Green 2008 Amwell 2009 Writtle 2010 N Daws Heath 2011 2012 0 miles 50 2013 2014 HEFA weather! WRI/13 HEFA teams, HEFA spirit
    [Show full text]
  • Nfl Releases Tight Ends and Offensive Linemen to Be Named Finalists for the ‘Nfl 100 All-Time Team’
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Alex Riethmiller – 310.840.4635 NFL – 12/9/19 [email protected] NFL RELEASES TIGHT ENDS AND OFFENSIVE LINEMEN TO BE NAMED FINALISTS FOR THE ‘NFL 100 ALL-TIME TEAM’ 18 Offensive Linemen and 5 Tight Ends to be Named to All-Time Team Episode 4 of ‘NFL 100 All-Time Team’ Airs on Friday, December 13 at 8:00 PM ET on NFL Network Following the reveal of the defensive back and specialist All-Time Team class last week, the NFL is proud to announce the 40 offensive linemen (16 offensive tackles; 15 guards; 9 centers) and 12 tight ends that are finalists for the NFL 100 All-Time Team. 39 of the 40 offensive linemen finalists have been enshrined in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. The 12 finalists at tight end include eight Pro Football Hall of Famers and combine for 711 career receiving touchdowns. Episode three will also reveal four head coaches to make the NFL 100 All-Time Team. The NFL100 All-Time Team airs every Friday at 8:00 PM ET through Week 17 of the regular season. Rich Eisen, Cris Collinsworth and Bill Belichick reveal selections by position each week, followed by a live reaction show hosted by Chris Rose immediately afterward, exclusively on NFL Network. From this group of finalists, the 26-person blue-ribbon voting panel ultimately selected seven offensive tackles, seven guards, four centers and five tight ends to the All-Time Team. The NFL 100 All-Time Team finalists at the offensive tackle position are: Player Years Played Team(s) Bob “The Boomer” Brown 1964-1968; 1969-1970; 1971- Philadelphia Eagles; Los Angeles 1973 Rams; Oakland Raiders Roosevelt Brown 1953-1965 New York Giants Lou Creekmur 1950-1959 Detroit Lions Dan Dierdorf 1971-1983 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Origins of Great Easton, Leicestershire: Commumity Archaeology Meets the ‘Big Dig’
    INVESTIGATING THE ORIGINS OF GREAT EASTON, LEICESTERSHIRE: COMMUMITY ARCHAEOLOGY MEETS THE ‘BIG DIG’. Nicholas J. Cooper and Vicki Score On Sunday June 22nd 2003, the inhabitants of Great Easton in the Welland Valley, in southeast Leicestershire, together with professional archaeologists from the University of Leicester and Channel 4’s Time Team, undertook a one-day field work investigation to try to establish the origins of their village and to chart its subsequent development. In conjunction with geophysical survey, a total of 41 metre-square test pits and two machine-excavated trenches were opened up across the village and dug to a maximum depth of 0.6m or until archaeology or natural was encountered (Fig. 1). Pits 14, 23, 35 & 44 were not excavated. Although most of the archaeological features recorded were modern (with the notable exceptions of a late Roman or Early Anglo-Saxon cobbled surface from Test Pit 3 and medieval plot boundaries in Trench 40) the artefactual material from the investigation has added considerably to the existing body of knowledge gathered by the Great Easton Fieldwork Group (Burningham and Wallis 2004, Fig. 1) over the last 20 years. This, along with more recent developer-funded opportunities, allows us to trace this focus of settlement back to the Roman period or later Iron Age (Fig. 2). Analysis of the pottery assemblage and its distribution has confirmed and complemented the findings of earlier work, which suggested the existence of a Roman period settlement (probably with an Iron Age antecedent), in the north- eastern part of the village, on higher ground around the church and immediately to the north in Lount’s Crescent.
    [Show full text]
  • How Important Was Basing House?
    How important was Basing House? A short introductory activity exploring the events and people of Basing House, Basingstoke, from its Tudor heyday in 1601 to its destruction in the Civil War in 1645. Duration: 30 minutes National Curriculum links KS2 History A local history study o A study over time tracing how several aspects of national history are reflected in the locality (this can go beyond 1066) o A study of an aspect of history or a site dating from a period beyond 1066 that is significant in the locality A study of an aspect or theme in British history that extends pupils’ chronological knowledge beyond 1066 o The changing power of monarchs o A significant turning point in British history Cross-curricular links KS2 English o Spoken language o Reading KS2 Geography o Locational knowledge o Human and physical geography Learning context Prior learning: none required. Learning objectives To learn what the local site of Basing House was like in its Tudor heyday (1601) To learn how the inhabitants of Basing House lived in 1601, and what happened to them in 1645. Learning outcomes All: will be able to investigate a primary and a secondary source to understand that Basing House is a local site at which there was a large, wealthy palace which is now in ruins. Most: will be able to construct a simple chronology of Basing House, drawing contrasts between its Tudor heyday and later destruction; understand that Basing House was an important and wealthy household. Some: will be able to critically interrogate and connect all sources to evaluate the importance of Basing House at two different time periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Mick Aston Archaeology Fund Supported by Historic England and Cadw
    Mick Aston Archaeology Fund Supported by Historic England and Cadw Mick Aston’s passion for involving people in archaeology is reflected in the Mick Aston Archaeology Fund. His determination to make archaeology publicly accessible was realised through his teaching, work on Time Team, and advocating community projects. The Mick Aston Archaeology Fund is therefore intended to encourage voluntary effort in making original contributions to the study and care of the historic environment. Please note that the Mick Aston Archaeology Fund is currently open to applicants carrying out work in England and Wales only. Historic Scotland run a similar scheme for projects in Scotland and details can be found at: http://www.historic-scotland.gov.uk/index/heritage/grants/grants-voluntary-sector- funding.htm. How does the Mick Aston Archaeology Fund work? Voluntary groups and societies, but also individuals, are challenged to put forward proposals for innovative projects that will say something new about the history and archaeology of local surroundings, and thus inform their future care. Proposals will be judged by a panel on their intrinsic quality, and evidence of capacity to see them through successfully. What is the Mick Aston Archaeology Fund panel looking for? First and foremost, the panel is looking for original research. Awards can be to support new work, or to support the completion of research already in progress, for example by paying for a specific piece of analysis or equipment. Projects which work with young people or encourage their participation are especially encouraged. What can funding be used for? In principle, almost anything that is directly related to the actual undertaking of a project.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Fairport Classic Volunteer Schedule
    2018 Fairport Classic Volunteer Schedule (by Last Name) Volunteer Time Team Name Player Last Name Player First Name 12:10 PM >Girls>3/4>DuBose Allison Erin 6:50 PM >Girls>5/6>Kondas Arao Julianna 12:10 PM >Boys>1/2>Cougevan Arnold Jonas 4:20 PM >Girls>5/6>Kondas Bardeschewski Olivia 9:30 AM >Girls>K>Cougevan Bender Carson 10:30 AM >Boys>3/4>Duffy Bissi Dale 1:50 PM >Boys>5/6>Pedro Brady Jack 4:20 PM >Girls>5/6>Kondas Broomfield Kennedy 1:50 PM >Boys>5/6>Pedro Buys Zachary 11:20 AM >Girls>3/4>DuBose Carter Lara 4:20 PM >Girls>5/6>Kondas Carter Natalee 6:50 PM >Boys>5/6>Ryan Catalano Brendon 7:30 AM >Boys>5/6>Cain Chadwick Garrett 6:50 PM >Boys>5/6>Ryan Clayton Luke 11:20 AM >Girls>3/4>DuBose Coccho Frankie 11:20 AM >Girls>1/2>Leary Coccho Isabella 9:30 AM >Girls>K>Cougevan Collins Ella 4:20 PM >Girls>3/4>Keys Dauria Savanna 2:40 PM >Boys>3/4>Nadelen DeMott Paul 4:20 PM >Girls>5/6>Kondas Derycke Aubrey 1:50 PM >Boys>1/2>Dollinger Deuel Colin 9:30 AM >Girls>K>Cougevan Dobbins Maura 11:20 AM >Boys>5/6>Pedro Evans Christian 4:20 PM >Girls>5/6>Kondas Fastaia Berit 10:30 AM >Boys>3/4>Duffy Fay Ryan 10:30 AM >Girls>1/2>Leary Fitzgerald Rory 10:30 AM >Girls>K>Cougevan Fitzgerald Teagan 8:50 AM >Girls>1/2>Leary Flannigan Avery 6:50 PM >Girls>5/6>Kondas Fuenfstueck Reese 6:50 PM >Boys>5/6>Ryan Garrett Marques 7:30 AM >Boys>K>Gibbons Garsin Ryan 6:50 PM >Boys>1/2>Haberer Grantham Jackson 8:50 AM >Girls>1/2>Leary Groot Olivia 7:30 AM >Boys>5/6>Cain Hagen Ryan 4:20 PM >Girls>3/4>Keys Hanny Ava 10:30 AM >Boys>3/4>Duffy Haugh Matthew 10:30 AM >Boys>K>Gibbons
    [Show full text]
  • Southern 50 Results 2020 50 Miles Position Time Team Number Team Name Team Location District County 1 13:34 6 Ten Gallon Dixie D
    Southern 50 Results 2020 50 miles Position Time Team Team Name Team Location District County Number 1 13:34 6 Ten Gallon Dixie Didcot ESU Thames Ridge Oxfordshire 2 13:57 7 Phoenix Flyers 201st Islington North London GLN 3 19:46 12 Pan Galactic Gargle Blasters Hitchhikers ESU Cambridge Cambridgeshire 4 21:45 1 Put Them On The Pile Hatters ESU Southgate GLN Not classified 2 SSESU St Saviour’s ESU Wimbledon & Wandle GLSW Not classified 3 WWKD WWKD Royal Kingston GLSW Not classified 5 Tigger Roo and Eeyore Hatters ESU Southgate GLN Not classified 8 Better Late Than Never Various Fleet, Odiham, Abingdon Hampshire/Oxfordshire Ten Gallon Dixie: 50 Miles Challenge Shield (presented to the fastest team and overall winners) Ten Gallon Dixie: Sharon Blower Trophy (Presented to the fastest mixed team) Phoenix Flyers: Robert Walters Trophy (Presented to the overall runners up) Put Them On The Pile: Grove Trophy (Presented to the fastest team whose average age is 33 years (whole years) per walker) 50 kms 1 07:14 57 22nd Southgate 22nd Southgate Southgate GLN 2 08:50 44 Hobgoblin Hobgoblin Network Basildon Essex 3 09:08 29 10 Litre Dixie Hornchurch Network Hornchurch GLNE 4 09:18 58 Phoenix Flyers Too 201st Islington North London GLN 5 09:33 30 Henlow Striders Henlow Clifton Biggleswade & District Bedfordshire 6 09:41 55 Team Hellfire 1st Salter Street West Warwickshire Warwickshire 7 09:53 56 Tesco Antibacterial Handwash Thames Ridge Network Thames Ridge Oxfordshire 8 10:13 48 Yeah Nah Yeah Nah Hatters ESU Southgate GLN 9 10:22 53 1st Runwell Overtakers
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire Archaeology JIGSAW “Piecing Together Cambridgeshire’S Past
    Cambridgeshire County Council JIGSAW Project Final report 2007 Cambridgeshire Archaeology JIGSAW “piecing together Cambridgeshire’s Past Final Report April 2007 Prepared By The Market Research Group (MRG), Bournemouth University, On Behalf Of Cambridgeshire County Council www.themarketresearchgroup.co.uk Page a Cambridgeshire County Council JIGSAW Project Final report 2007 Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................ 1 1.0: Background .............................................................................. 3 1.1: The Market Research Group (MRG)........................................ 3 1.2: Cambridgeshire County Council .............................................. 4 2.0: Research Aims & Objectives................................................... 6 3.0: Outline Methodology................................................................ 8 3.1: Audience Research - Existing Users ....................................... 8 3.2: Audience Research - Potential Users ...................................... 9 3.3: Audience Research – JIGSAW Focus Groups ...................... 11 4.0: Findings –Cambridgeshire Archaeology users results...... 12 5.0: Findings – Potential users or non user survey ................... 39 6.0: Findings – Castle celebration event (non users) ................ 79 7.0: Findings - Schools – qualitative results............................. 101 8.0: Findings – Focus group results.......................................... 116 8.1: Users and non users focus groups
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Medieval Period, Its Main Conclusion Is They Were Compiled at Malmesbury
    Early Medieval 10 Early Medieval Edited by Chris Webster from contributions by Mick Aston, Bruce Eagles, David Evans, Keith Gardner, Moira and Brian Gittos, Teresa Hall, Bill Horner, Susan Pearce, Sam Turner, Howard Williams and Barbara Yorke 10.1 Introduction raphy, as two entities: one “British” (covering most 10.1.1 Early Medieval Studies of the region in the 5th century, and only Cornwall by the end of the period), and one “Anglo-Saxon” The South West of England, and in particular the three (focusing on the Old Sarum/Salisbury area from the western counties of Cornwall, Devon and Somerset, later 5th century and covering much of the region has a long history of study of the Early Medieval by the 7th and 8th centuries). This is important, not period. This has concentrated on the perceived “gap” only because it has influenced past research questions, between the end of the Roman period and the influ- but also because this ethnic division does describe (if ence of Anglo-Saxon culture; a gap of several hundred not explain) a genuine distinction in the archaeological years in the west of the region. There has been less evidence in the earlier part of the period. Conse- emphasis on the eastern parts of the region, perhaps quently, research questions have to deal less with as they are seen as peripheral to Anglo-Saxon studies a period, than with a highly complex sequence of focused on the east of England. The region identi- different types of Early Medieval archaeology, shifting fied as the kingdom of Dumnonia has received detailed both chronologically and geographically in which issues treatment in most recent work on the subject, for of continuity and change from the Roman period, and example Pearce (1978; 2004), KR Dark (1994) and the evolution of medieval society and landscape, frame Somerset has been covered by Costen (1992) with an internally dynamic period.
    [Show full text]
  • Albion PD 2012-57 Vers
    HUNTINGDON ROAD/NIAB CAMBRIDGE PROJECT DESIGN FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION HUNTINGDON ROAD/NIAB CAMBRIDGE PROJECT DESIGN FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION Project: NBC1942 CHER event no.: ECB3788 Planning application: 07/0003/OUT Document: 2012/70 Version: 1.3 Compiled by Checked by Approved by Mike Luke Drew Shotliff Hester Cooper-Reade 20th November 2013 Produced for: CgMs Consulting Ltd Copyright Albion Archaeology 2013, all rights reserved Albion Archaeology Contents Purpose of this document 4 Key terms 5 1. INTRODUCTION 6 1.1 Project background 6 1.2 Site location, topography and geology 6 2. ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND 8 3. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 9 3.1 Introduction 9 3.2 Relevant national, regional and county research frameworks 9 3.3 Specific objectives 10 4. METHODOLOGIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIELDWORK 13 4.1 Introduction 13 4.2 Provisional project programme 13 4.3 Overview of the fieldwork methodology 13 4.4 Overview of finds processing 14 4.5 Overview of environmental studies 14 4.6 Constraints on archaeological investigation 15 4.7 Feedback into and adjustment of excavation strategies 16 4.8 Monitoring and area “sign offs” 16 4.9 Landowner issues 17 4.10 Preliminary dissemination of results 17 4.11 Record checking and archive consolidation 17 4.12 Assessment and Updated Project Design 18 4.13 Analysis, publication and archiving 19 5. PROJECT COMMUNICATION, DELIVERY AND QUALITY 21 5.1 Communication 21 5.2 Delivery 22 5.3 Quality 22 6. THE PROJECT TEAM 24 6.1 Introduction to Albion Archaeology 24 6.2 Project structure and responsibilities 24 6.3 Relevant experience 24 6.4 Members of the project team 25 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Archaeological Evaluation at Syndale Park, Ospringe, Kent
    Syndale Park, Ospringe, Kent Archaeological Evaluation and an Assessment of the Results Ref: 52568.01 Wessex Archaeology May 2003 SYNDALE PARK, OSPRINGE, KENT AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION AND AN ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULTS Document Ref. 52568.01 May 2003 Prepared for: Videotext Communications Ltd 49 Goldhawk Road LONDON SW1 8QP By: Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park SALISBURY Wiltshire SP4 6EB © Copyright The Trust for Wessex Archaeology Limited 2003, all rights reserved The Trust for Wessex Archaeology Limited, Registered Charity No. 287786 1 SYNDALE PARK, OSPRINGE, KENT AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION AND AN ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULTS Contents Summary..................................................................................................................4 Acknowledgements..................................................................................................5 1 BACKGROUND............................................................................................6 1.1 Description of the site.....................................................................................6 1.2 Previous archaeological work .......................................................................6 2 METHODS.....................................................................................................8 2.1 Introduction....................................................................................................8 2.2 Aims and objectives .......................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Cunetio Roman Town, Mildenhall Marlborough, Wiltshire
    Wessex Archaeology Cunetio Roman Town, Mildenhall Marlborough, Wiltshire Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Ref: 71509 July 2011 CUNETIO ROMAN TOWN, MILDENHALL, MARLBOROUGH, WILTSHIRE Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Prepared for: Videotext Communications Ltd 11 St Andrew’s Crescent CARDIFF CF10 3DB by Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park SALISBURY Wiltshire SP4 6EB Report reference: 71509.01 Path: \\Projectserver\WESSEX\PROJECTS\71509\Post Ex\Report\71509/TT Cunetio Report (ed LNM) July 2011 © Wessex Archaeology Limited 2011 all rights reserved Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No. 287786 Cunetio Roman Town, Mildenhall, Marlborough, Wiltshire Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results DISCLAIMER THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT WAS DESIGNED AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF A REPORT TO AN INDIVIDUAL CLIENT AND WAS PREPARED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THAT CLIENT. THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT DOES NOT NECESSARILY STAND ON ITS OWN AND IS NOT INTENDED TO NOR SHOULD IT BE RELIED UPON BY ANY THIRD PARTY. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW WESSEX ARCHAEOLOGY WILL NOT BE LIABLE BY REASON OF BREACH OF CONTRACT NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE (WHETHER DIRECT INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL) OCCASIONED TO ANY PERSON ACTING OR OMITTING TO ACT OR REFRAINING FROM ACTING IN RELIANCE UPON THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT ARISING FROM OR CONNECTED WITH ANY ERROR OR OMISSION IN THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THE REPORT. LOSS OR DAMAGE AS REFERRED TO ABOVE SHALL BE DEEMED TO INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, ANY LOSS OF PROFITS OR ANTICIPATED PROFITS DAMAGE TO REPUTATION OR GOODWILL LOSS OF BUSINESS OR ANTICIPATED BUSINESS DAMAGES COSTS EXPENSES INCURRED OR PAYABLE TO ANY THIRD PARTY (IN ALL CASES WHETHER DIRECT INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL) OR ANY OTHER DIRECT INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL LOSS OR DAMAGE QUALITY ASSURANCE SITE CODE 71509 ACCESSION CODE CLIENT CODE PLANNING APPLICATION REF.
    [Show full text]