The Language of Anatomy the Medial Line the Medial Line Is the Central

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

The Language of Anatomy The Medial Line The medial line is the central axis of the figure, dividing the body vertically into equal right and left haves. (In medical terminology, it is referred to as the midsagittal plane.) On the front (anterior) side of the body, the medial line travels straight down through the cranium, breastbone, navel, and pubic bone, continuing between the legs down to the ground. On the back (posterior) side, the medial line goes through the cranium, follows the spine, and again continues down to the ground between the legs. The central axis of the body is a valuable landmark because it helps you accurately assess the figure’s position, as when there is a noticeable tilt to the torso or a twisting action in the torso. In action poses, the central axis generally travels down through the leg that is more stable or that is positioned in a way that continues the action of the pose in a more sweeping gesture. Anatomical Planes The anatomical planes are three planes or reference that divide the body vertically and horizontally while it is in the anatomical position. Think of these imaginary planes as thin sheets of transparent glass, perpendicular to one another, that slice through the body, creating three different dimensions. Specific kinds of movement can only occur within certain planes. Sagittal Plane The sagittal plane divides the body vertically into equal right and left halves. This plane is also referred to as the midsagittal plane because it is on the midline of the body. Movements within the sagittal plane are flexion and extension – forward and backward movements of the head, spine, and limbs. Coronal Plane The coronal plane divides the body vertically into equal front (anterior) and back (posterior) portions. The coronal plane, (also referred to as the frontal plane) is always perpendicular to the sagittal plane. Movements within this plane are abduction and adduction (side-to-side movements of the arms and legs) and lateral flexion (side-to-side movements of the head, neck, and torso). Transverse Plane A transverse plane divides the body horizontally, from side to side or left to right, into upper (superior) and lower (inferior) portions. Traditionally, when the transverse plane is indicated in anatomical charts, its division is placed below the waist. Movements within transverse planes include rotation of the head, spine, and limbs. Anatomical Directions/Locations Medial – Toward the medial line or central axis of the body Lateral – Away from the medial line or central axis of the body Anterior – In front of; toward the front of the body; ventral Posterior – In back of; toward the back of the body; dorsal Superior – Above; refers to the structures closer to the head or toward the upper part of a structure or body part Inferior – Below; refers to the structures closer to the feet or toward the lower part of a structure or body partÛ Û Classic Human Anatomy: The Artist’s Guide to Form, Function, and Movement by Valerie L. Winslow – pp. 27, 28 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Copyrighted Material
C01 10/31/2017 11:23:53 Page 1 1 1 The Normal Anatomy of the Neck David Bainbridge Introduction component’ of the neck is a common site of pathology, and the diverse forms of neck The neck is a common derived characteristic disease reflect the sometimes complex and of land vertebrates, not shared by their aquatic conflicting regional variations and functional ancestors. In fish, the thoracic fin girdle, the constraints so evident in this region [2]. precursor of the scapula, coracoid and clavi- Unlike the abdomen and thorax, there is no cle, is frequently fused to the caudal aspect of coelomic cavity in the neck, yet its ventral part the skull. In contrast, as vertebrates emerged is taken up by a relatively small ‘visceral on to the dry land, the forelimb separated from compartment’, containing the larynx, trachea, the head and the intervening vertebrae speci- oesophagus and many important vessels, alised to form a relatively mobile region – the nerves and endocrine glands. However, I neck – to allow the head to be freely steered in will not review these structures, as they do many directions. not represent an extension of the equine ‘back’ With the exception of the tail, the neck in the same way that the more dorsal locomo- remains the most mobile region of the spinal tor region does. column in modern-day horses. It permits a wide range of sagittal plane flexion and exten- sion to allow alternating periods of grazing Cervical Vertebrae 3–7 and predator surveillance, as well as frontal plane flexion to allow the horizon to be scan- Almost all mammals, including the horse, ned, and rotational movement to allow possess seven cervical vertebrae, C1 to C7 nuisance insects to be flicked off.
[Show full text]
Evaluation and Treatment of Selected Sacral Somatic Dysfunctions
Evaluation and Treatment of Selected Sacral Somatic Dysfunctions Using Direct and HVLA Techniques including Counterstrain and Muscle Energy AND Counterstrain Treatment of the Pelvis and Sacrum F. P. Wedel, D.O. Associate Adjunct Professor in Osteopathic Principles and Practice A.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, and private practice in Family Medicine in Tucson, Arizona Learning Objectives HOURS 1 AND 2 Review the following diagnostic and treatment techniques related to sacral torsion Lumbosacral spring test Sacral palpation Seated flexion test HOURS 3 AND 4 Counterstrain treatments of various low back pathologies Sacral Techniques Covered : 1. Prone, direct, muscle energy, for sacral rotation on both same and opposite axes 2. HVLA treatment for sacral rotation on both same and opposite axes 3. Counterstain treatment of sacral tender points and of sacral torsion Counterstrain Multifidi and Rotatores : UP5L Gluteii – maximus: HFO-SI, HI, P 3L- P 4L ,medius, minimus Piriformis Background and Basis The 4 Osteopathic Tenets (Principles) 1. The body is a unit; the person is a unit of body, mind, and spirit. 2. Structure and function are reciprocally inter-related. 3. The body is capable of self- regulation, self-healing, and health maintenance. 4. Rational treatment is based upon an understanding of these basic principles. Somatic Dysfunction - Defined • “Impaired or altered function of related components of the somatic (body framework) system: • Skeletal, arthrodial, and myofascial structures, • And… • Related vascular, lymphatic, and neural elements” Treatment Options for Somatic Dysfunctions All somatic dysfunctions have a restrictive barrier which are considered “pathologic” This restriction inhibits movement in one direction which causes asymmetry within the joint: The goal of osteopathic treament is to eliminate the restrictive barrier thus restoring symmetry….
[Show full text]
The Influence of the Rib Cage on the Static and Dynamic Stability
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The infuence of the rib cage on the static and dynamic stability responses of the scoliotic spine Shaowei Jia1,2, Liying Lin3, Hufei Yang2, Jie Fan2, Shunxin Zhang2 & Li Han3* The thoracic cage plays an important role in maintaining the stability of the thoracolumbar spine. In this study, the infuence of a rib cage on static and dynamic responses in normal and scoliotic spines was investigated. Four spinal fnite element (FE) models (T1–S), representing a normal spine with rib cage (N1), normal spine without rib cage (N2), a scoliotic spine with rib cage (S1) and a scoliotic spine without rib cage (S2), were established based on computed tomography (CT) images, and static, modal, and steady-state analyses were conducted. In S2, the Von Mises stress (VMS) was clearly decreased compared to S1 for four bending loadings. N2 and N1 showed a similar VMS to each other, and there was a signifcant increase in axial compression in N2 and S2 compared to N1 and S1, respectively. The U magnitude values of N2 and S2 were higher than in N1 and S1 for fve loadings, respectively. The resonant frequencies of N2 and S2 were lower than those in N1 and S1, respectively. In steady-state analysis, maximum amplitudes of vibration for N2 and S2 were signifcantly larger than N1 and S1, respectively. This study has revealed that the rib cage improves spinal stability in vibrating environments and contributes to stability in scoliotic spines under static and dynamic loadings. Scoliosis, a three-dimensional deformity, prevents healthy development.
[Show full text]
Biomechanics of the Thoracic Spine - Development of a Method to Measure the Influence of the Rib Cage on Thoracic Spine Movement
Universität Ulm Zentrum für Chirurgie Institut für Unfallchirurgische Forschung und Biomechanik Direktor: Prof. Dr. A. Ignatius Biomechanics of the Thoracic Spine - Development of a Method to Measure the Influence of the Rib Cage on Thoracic Spine Movement Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Medizin der Medizinischen Fakultät der Universität Ulm vorgelegt von: Konrad Appelt geboren in: Pforzheim 2012 Amtierender Dekan: Prof. Dr. Thomas Wirth 1. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. H.-J. Wilke 2. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Tobias Böckers Tag der Promotion: 06.06.2013 Index List of abbreviations ......................................................................................IV 1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 State of Research .................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Objectives ............................................................................................................... 6 2 Material and methods .............................................................................. 7 2.1 Testing machines and devices ................................................................................. 7 2.1.1 Spine loading simulator ................................................................................... 7 2.1.2 Vicon – MX Motion Capture System
[Show full text]
Lab Manual Axial Skeleton Atla
1 PRE-LAB EXERCISES When studying the skeletal system, the bones are often sorted into two broad categories: the axial skeleton and the appendicular skeleton. This lab focuses on the axial skeleton, which consists of the bones that form the axis of the body. The axial skeleton includes bones in the skull, vertebrae, and thoracic cage, as well as the auditory ossicles and hyoid bone. In addition to learning about all the bones of the axial skeleton, it is also important to identify some significant bone markings. Bone markings can have many shapes, including holes, round or sharp projections, and shallow or deep valleys, among others. These markings on the bones serve many purposes, including forming attachments to other bones or muscles and allowing passage of a blood vessel or nerve. It is helpful to understand the meanings of some of the more common bone marking terms. Before we get started, look up the definitions of these common bone marking terms: Canal: Condyle: Facet: Fissure: Foramen: (see Module 10.18 Foramina of Skull) Fossa: Margin: Process: Throughout this exercise, you will notice bold terms. This is meant to focus your attention on these important words. Make sure you pay attention to any bold words and know how to explain their definitions and/or where they are located. Use the following modules to guide your exploration of the axial skeleton. As you explore these bones in Visible Body’s app, also locate the bones and bone markings on any available charts, models, or specimens. You may also find it helpful to palpate bones on yourself or make drawings of the bones with the bone markings labeled.
[Show full text]
Vertebral Column
Vertebral Column • Backbone consists of Cervical 26 vertebrae. • Five vertebral regions – Cervical vertebrae (7) Thoracic in the neck. – Thoracic vertebrae (12) in the thorax. – Lumbar vertebrae (5) in the lower back. Lumbar – Sacrum (5, fused). – Coccyx (4, fused). Sacrum Coccyx Scoliosis Lordosis Kyphosis Atlas (C1) Posterior tubercle Vertebral foramen Tubercle for transverse ligament Superior articular facet Transverse Transverse process foramen Facet for dens Anterior tubercle • Atlas- ring of bone, superior facets for occipital condyles. – Nodding movement signifies “yes”. Axis (C2) Spinous process Lamina Vertebral foramen Transverse foramen Transverse process Superior articular facet Odontoid process (dens) •Axis- dens or odontoid process is body of atlas. – Pivotal movement signifies “no”. Typical Cervical Vertebra (C3-C7) • Smaller bodies • Larger spinal canal • Transverse processes –Shorter – Transverse foramen for vertebral artery • Spinous processes of C2 to C6 often bifid • 1st and 2nd cervical vertebrae are unique – Atlas & axis Typical Cervical Vertebra Spinous process (bifid) Lamina Vertebral foramen Inferior articular process Superior articular process Transverse foramen Pedicle Transverse process Body Thoracic Vertebrae (T1-T12) • Larger and stronger bodies • Longer transverse & spinous processes • Demifacets on body for head of rib • Facets on transverse processes (T1-T10) for tubercle of rib Thoracic Vertebra- superior view Spinous process Transverse process Facet for tubercle of rib Lamina Superior articular process
[Show full text]
Scapular Positioning and Movement in Unimpaired Shoulders, Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, and Glenohumeral Instability
Scand J Med Sci Sports 2011: 21: 352–358 & 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01274.x Review Scapular positioning and movement in unimpaired shoulders, shoulder impingement syndrome, and glenohumeral instability F. Struyf1,2, J. Nijs1,2,3, J.-P. Baeyens4, S. Mottram5, R. Meeusen2 1Department of Health Sciences, Division of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Artesis University College Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, 2Department of Human Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium, 3University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium, 4Department of Biometry and Biomechanics, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium, 5KC International, Portsmouth, UK Corresponding author: Jo Nijs, PhD, Department of Health Sciences, Division of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Artesis University College Antwerp, Campus HIKE, Van Aertselaerstraat 31, 2170 Merksem, Antwerp, Belgium. Tel: 132 364 18265, E-mail: [email protected] Accepted for publication 9 November 2010 The purpose of this manuscript is to review the knowledge of horizontal, 351 of internal rotation and 101 anterior tilt. scapular positioning at rest and scapular movement in During shoulder elevation, most researchers agree that the diﬀerent anatomic planes in asymptomatic subjects and scapula tilts posteriorly and rotates both upward and patients with shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) and externally. It appears that during shoulder elevation, pa- glenohumeral shoulder instability. We reviewed the litera- tients with SIS demonstrate a decreased upward scapular ture for all biomechanical and kinematic studies using rotation, a decreased posterior tilt, and a decrease in keywords for impingement syndrome, shoulder instability, external rotation. In patients with glenohumeral shoulder and scapular movement published in peer reviewed journal.
[Show full text]
Fractures of the Odontoid Process of the Axis*
Fractures of the Odontoid Process of the Axis* BY LEWIS D. ANDERSON,M.D.?, AND RICHARD T. D'ALONZO,M.D.$, MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine and the Campbell Foundation, Memphis ABSTRACT:Odontoid fractures were classified into three types, and, in a series of forty-nine fractures, two avulsion, thirty-two body, and fifteen basilar fractures were treated and followed for an average of twenty-two months (range, six months to nineteen years). Body fractures are most prone to non-union and surgery (spine fusion) is commonly required in this group. Fractures of the odontoid process and the body of the axis have always aroused in- terest but there is little agreement on the best method of treatment and the long-term prog- nosis of these injuries. The incidence of non-union of fractures of the odontoid process has been variously estimated to be as low as 4.8 per cent and as high as 62.8 per cent 1,2,8- lo. Osgood and Lund reviewed the relevant literature in 1928, and found only fifty-five reported cases of fracture of the odontoid process. They noted that most previous authors had found a high incidence of neurological involvement and death, but suspected that this was related to many of the reported cases being from autopsy material. However, in ten of their reported patients paralysis was not present at the time of initial injury and sub- sequently caused death after a second, trivial injury. Osgood and Lund did state that the general impression at the time of the 1928 article was that union rarely occurred.
[Show full text]
The Evolution of the Horse
BY LES SELLNOW he evolution of the horse from a tiny, four-toed an imal, T perhaps no more than one foot tall, to the variety of equines in existence today, is one of the wonders of nature. During that process of change, the horse evolved over many thousands of years from an animal that predators hunted for food to an animal that became a servant and friend for mankind. Today’s horses are designed to do one of two things— pull a load with their shoulders or carry riders on their backs. The type of horses utilized for these respective tasks varies a good deal; one is large and pon d erous and the other is lighter-boned with less mu s cle mass. Even within these two types, there are significant differences. For example, the conformation of a roping or cutting This first article of a 12-part series on equine anatomy and horse is different from that of the American Saddle- physiology discusses basic terminology, the horse’s largest bred. Yet there is a basic sameness to anatomy. organ, and how horses and humans are alike (and different) ROBIN PETERSON ILLUSTRATIONS 2 www.TheHorse.com THE HORSE January 2006 January 2006 THE HORSE www.TheHorse.com 3 Saudi Arabia as chief medical illustrator closer to the tail (cauda). Example: The Median Plane—This divides the horse’s for the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and horse’s back is caudal to his neck. body into right and left halves (median Research Center in Riyadh. Through the Rostral—That part of the structure means in the middle).
[Show full text]
I. Axial Vs Appendicular Axial Skeleton Forms Long Axis of Body: Skull
Anatomy Lecture Notes Chapters 7 and 8 I. axial vs appendicular axial skeleton forms long axis of body: skull, vertebral column, rib cage appendicular - bones of upper and lower limbs including girdles that attach limbs to axial skeleton II. bone markings A. functions attachment joint surfaces tunnels for blood vessels and nerves B. general meanings 1. projection = something that sticks out from the surface of the bone 2. depression = something that dips in from the surface of the bone 3. opening = tunnel that goes into or through a bone C. confusing terms: 1. tuberosity trochanter tubercle 2. condyle epicondyle 3. crest line spine 4. meatus foramen fissure 5. fossa groove Strong/Fall 2008 page 1 Anatomy Lecture Notes Chapters 7 and 8 III. axial skeleton A. skull = cranium + facial bones 1. cranium = bones that enclose brain frontal parietal temporal occipital sphenoid ethmoid 2. suture = interlocking, fused joint between flat bones coronal - frontal and parietal sagittal - left and right parietal squamous - parietal and temporal lambdoidal - parietal and occipital sutural bones = small bones within sutures, no always present 3. paranasal sinuses = cavities inside bones located in frontal, maxillary, sphenoid, and ethmoid bones filled with air lined by mucous membrane open into nasal cavity condition incoming air (increase surface area of mucosa), voice resonance, decrease skull bone mass 4. fontanel - un-ossified fibrous membranes of skull allow compression of skull during delivery allow continued cranial growth after birth eventually close: anterior posterior mastoid sphenoidal Strong/Fall 2008 page 2 Anatomy Lecture Notes Chapters 7 and 8 B. spinal column 1. vertebra/vertebrae body (anterior) arch (posterior) lamina pedicle vertebral foramen processes spinous transverse superior articular inferior articular 2.
[Show full text]
Coccygeal Pits
Coccygeal Pits Bradley E. Weprin, MD*‡§, and W. Jerry Oakes, MDʈ¶ ABSTRACT. Background. Congenital dermal sinuses ABBREVIATION. OSD, occult spinal dysraphism. represent cutaneous depressions or tracts that are lined by stratified squamous epithelium. They communicate between the surface of the skin and deeper structures utaneous abnormalities of the back may rep- and may occur anywhere along the craniospinal axis. resent underlying malformations of the spine. These sinuses are thought to result from abnormal sep- One such anomaly, the congenital dermal si- aration of the cutaneous and neural ectoderm between C nus, is a superficial depression or tract in the skin the third and fifth week of intrauterine life. They may be that is lined by stratified squamous epithelium. Its often accompanied by other cutaneous stigmata, various appearance can signify the presence of an abnormal dysraphic abnormalities, or intraspinal tumors. In the sacrococcygeal area, cutaneous congenital abnor- connection between the skin surface and subarach- malities are relatively common. It is estimated that 2% to noid space and/or an occult dysraphic state. This 4% of children harbor intergluteal dorsal dermal sinuses. potential communication places the child at addi- These intergluteal sinuses in the perianal region are fre- tional neurologic risk from meningitis, which can quently referred to as pits or dimples. Their cause is sometimes be recurrent. These congenital dermal si- considered similar to other congenital dermal sinuses nuses are frequently associated with other cutaneous and appears unrelated to acquired pilonidal conditions signatures, occult dysraphic lesions, or intraspinal observed in adults. They may become susceptible to local tumors. The natural history of such occult spinal recurrent infection from trauma or hirsutism.
[Show full text]
Emergency Ultrasound
>> EEMERGENCYMERGENCY Phillips Perera, MD, RDMS, FACEP Thomas Mailhot, MD, RDMS UULTRASOUNDLTRASOUND Diku Mandavia, MD, FACEP, FRCPC Rapid Ultrasound in SHock: The RUSH Protocol EVALUATION OF THE PUMP: THE PARASTERNAL CARDIAC VIEWS Last month, we presented an overview of a unified ultrasound protocol for evalua- tion of the critical patient (Rapid Ultrasound in SHock, or RUSH). The RUSH exam employs bedside ultrasound to rapidly evaluate both the anatomy and physiology of a patient in shock, allowing the emergency physician to better identify the type of shock state and to formulate optimal therapy. The three main components of the exam were introduced: bedside ultrasonography to evaluate the “pump” (ie, cardiac echocardiogra- phy assessing for left ventricular contractility, pericardial effusion, and right ventricular strain), the “tank” (assessing the core vascular volume and Figure 1. Evaluation of identifying “fullness” or “leakiness” in the tank), and the the Pump “pipes” (assessing for thoracic or abdominal aortic aneu- rysm or dissection and deep vein thrombosis). This month, we emphasize the first component of the RUSH exam: the evaluation of the heart using bedside echo- cardiography. Focused echocardiography is best performed with a small footprint phased-array probe at a frequency of about 3 MHz. The heart is traditionally examined from four views on the anterior chest wall: the parasternal long- and short-axis, subxiphoid, and apical planes (Figure 1). In this article, the parasternal long- and short-axis planes will be examined in more detail. It is important for the emergency physician to learn and practice visualizing the parasternal views of the heart, as they often allow for a detailed cardiac examination and pro- vide important information about the patient’s physiologi- A.
[Show full text]