Brochure Show Only Certain Parts and Aspects of the Property at the Time When the Photographs Were Taken
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Deep Dive: 04 Digital and Creative Industries
Deep Dive: 04 Digital and Creative Industries Date: September 2016 FINAL REPORT Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 3 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 7 2 Definitions ................................................................................................................. 8 3 Significance ............................................................................................................. 10 4 Business and Employment ...................................................................................... 12 5 Skills ........................................................................................................................ 26 6 Key Assets .............................................................................................................. 34 7 Growth Potential ...................................................................................................... 42 8 Spatial Considerations ............................................................................................. 48 September 2016 2 Executive Summary Context Across Greater Manchester (GM) – and the North more broadly – the Digital and Creative Industries sector is disrupting traditional business models and providing strong growth in both employment and Gross Value Added (GVA). Digital, one of four prime capabilities identified for the Northern -
Completed Acquisition by Lightcatch Limited (Trading As Betfred) of Tote (Successor Company) Limited
Completed acquisition by Lightcatch Limited (trading as Betfred) of Tote (Successor Company) Limited The OFT's decision on reference under section 22 given on 16 December 2011. Full text of decision published 19 January 2012. Please note that the square brackets indicate figures or text which have been deleted or replaced in ranges at the request of the parties or third parties for reasons of commercial confidentiality. PARTIES 1. Lightcatch Limited ('Lightcatch') is the parent company of Done Brothers (Cash Betting) Limited, a UK bookmaker trading under the name 'Betfred' (jointly, 'Betfred'). Betfred provides fixed odds betting services in licensed betting offices ('LBOs'), by telephone, on the internet and on racecourses and gaming services in LBOs and on the internet. In 2010, the total amounts staked with Betfred were around £[ ] million with a gross win (the amounts staked with customers' winnings deducted) of around £[ ] million. 2. Tote (Successor Company) Limited (the 'Tote') is a Crown-owned company that was established for the purposes of the merger in order to succeed to the property, rights and liabilities of the Horserace Totalisator Board. The Tote provided fixed odds betting services in LBOs (branded as 'totesport'), by telephone, on the internet and on racecourses and gaming services in LBOs and on the internet. It also provided pool betting services on horseracing. In 2010, the total amounts staked with the Tote were around £[ ] million with a gross win of around £[ ] million. TRANSACTION 3. On 13 July 2011 Lightcatch acquired the Tote from the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport (the 'Transaction'). 1 1 JURISDICTION 4. -
The Legal Protection and Regulation of Sponsorship Rights in English Football
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by White Rose E-theses Online The Legal Protection and Regulation of Sponsorship Rights in English Football Sabah Qasim Khedir ‘Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctoral of Philosophy’ University of Leeds School of Law Centre for the Study of Business Law and Practice December 2018 Abstract Sponsorship is a form of promotional communication with the basic goal to persuade. Researchers have offered a series of benefits for the sponsor that can be achieved through selecting the ideal property, including, obtaining brand exposure, achieving brand recall, enhancing brand image, and communicating a brand theme in the hope of obtaining sales. However, differentiating the brand from competitors is a distinctive tactic essential for realising a competitive advantage. To assist with brand differentiating, corporate sponsors negotiate for exclusivity within a product or service category. Product category exclusivity acts to eliminate corporations within a sponsor’s product or service category from the sponsored subject. Therefore, sponsors pay a premium price to achieve such a restricted promotional position. However, instances of competing sponsorship interests within a football event or league have become common as broadcasters, footballers and stadiums owners all pursue corporate support. Where these separate actors in the same sports marketplace have not collaborate effectively to limit sponsor category conflicts, a sponsoring brand may find it difficult to establish unique image association within the football domain apart from category competitors. This questions the level of exclusivity football associations and related enterprises grant to their official sponsors. -
Cash Betting
Account Address Line 1 Address Line 2 City Post Code Done Brothers (Cash Betting) Limited Betfred 68 Station Road, Yate BRISTOL BS37 4PH Unit 6 Berryden Retail Park, Berryden Done Brothers (Cash Betting) Limited Betfred Road ABERDEEN AB25 3SA Sunset Boulevard Amusement Park, John Codona's Pleasure Fairs Limited J Codona's Pleasure Fairs Ltd Beach Esplanade ABERDEEN AB24 5ED John Dawson, Paul Dawson And John Barbour Leisureland 171 George Street ABERDEEN AB25 1HX John Dawson, Paul Dawson And John Barbour Grampian Leisure 6 -24 Netherkirkgate ABERDEEN AB10 1HX The Noble Leisure Company Limited Nobles Leisure Group The Boardwalk, Beach Esplanade ABERDEEN AB10 1AQ Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming Limited Ladbrokes 16-18 Rose Street ABERDEEN AB10 1UA Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming Limited Ladbrokes 11 Clifton Road ABERDEEN AB24 4RZ Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming Limited Ladbrokes 10 Clunie Place ABERDEEN AB16 5RN Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming Limited Ladbrokes 24 Guild Street ABERDEEN AB11 6NF Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming Limited Ladbrokes 95 Hayton Road ABERDEEN AB24 2RN Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming Limited Ladbrokes 156 Oscar Road ABERDEEN AB11 8EJ Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming Limited Ladbrokes 113 Rousay Drive ABERDEEN AB15 6LT Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming Limited Ladbrokes 2 Seaton Drive ABERDEEN AB24 1UX Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming Limited Ladbrokes 4 South Esplanade East ABERDEEN AB11 9PB Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming Limited Ladbrokes 50 Union Street ABERDEEN AB10 1BB Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming Limited Ladbrokes 198 Union Street ABERDEEN AB10 1QS Ladbrokes Betting -
Betfred 32 Gerrard Street London W1D
Betfred, 2 Station Parade, Barking, IG11 8DL Application for Betting Premises Licence under the Gambling Act 2005 Representations Received From Interested Parties 1. Introduction 1.1 Betfred acknowledges the representations received regarding this application and wishes to respond in order to explain its proposal in the light of the relevant licensing objectives. 1.2 At the outset it should be noted that there have been no adverse representations received from any of the Responsible Authorities tasked with the responsibility of scrutinising this application, so as to ensure that any grant falls squarely within to Section 153 of the Gambling Act 2005. Whilst the Metropolitan Police did make representations, Betfred has now agreed a number of conditions, as set out in a letter from them dated 30th July 2014. Betfred believes that those representations are therefore no longer being pursued. Accordingly, in deciding whether this application falls to be granted, having regard to the terms of Section 153, Betfred pray in aid particularly the decisions taken by the Licensing Authority and the Metropolitan Police not to object. 2. Betfred the Company 2.1 Betfred presently trade 3 licences in the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham; 190 shops in the London Region and as a Company, it operates 1380 shops Nationwide. It is the Country’s 4th largest Bookmaker and operates with the benefit of an Operating Licence issued by the Gambling Commission. 2.2 As the Licensing Authority may know, Betfred was first established by brothers Fred Done (from whom the company now gets its trading name) and Peter Done, in 1967 in Salford in Greater Manchester. -
ASCOT RACECOURSE ANNOUNCES BETFRED AS OFFICIAL BOOKMAKER 9Th May 2019
ASCOT RACECOURSE ANNOUNCES BETFRED AS OFFICIAL BOOKMAKER 9th May 2019 Ascot Racecourse is pleased to announce that Betfred will be the ‘Official Bookmaker’ of Ascot and Royal Ascot, in a new three-year relationship running from 2019 to 2021. The contract includes operation of the two on site betting shops within the Grandstand and sponsoring the Betfred Heritage Handicap on Summer Mile Day, 13th July. They will also be official bookmakers of the Dubai Duty Free Shergar Cup in August, providing prices straight after the draw. This relationship is an extension of the arrangement that saw Ascot and Totepool, a majority asset of Betfred, launch Bet With Ascot, the on course pool betting service, last year. Totepool are sponsors of this weekend’s Victoria Cup as the Tote Victoria Cup. Fred Done, Betfred Founder, said: “A big thank you to the Ascot team who have been a pleasure to work with and I am delighted to have agreed a deal to become the official bookmaker of Ascot and Royal Ascot and to see the Betfred brand back on the racecourse. I will be offering Ascot punters the terrific value and bonuses available in all of our high street shops and look forward to welcoming you to the newly refurbished Betfred shops.” Guy Henderson, Chief Executive Officer at Ascot Racecourse, welcomed the new relationship: “We welcome this further strengthening of ties with Betfred, following the launch of Bet With Ascot last year in partnership with Totepool and, at Royal Ascot, the Hong Kong Jockey Club. Our thanks go to Roy Holbrook and Winning Post Bookmakers for all their support in their tenure as our on-course betting shop provider.” Juliet Slot, Chief Commercial Officer at Ascot Racecourse, added: “We are delighted to welcome Betfred back to Ascot as Official Bookmaker. -
The Digital Powerhouse the Innovation Potential of Tech Clusters in the North May 2016
THE DIGITAL POWERHOUSE THE INNOVATION POTENTIAL OF TECH CLUSTERS IN THE NORTH MAY 2016 #DigitalPowerhouse How big is the North’s digital economy? £9.9bn GVA The region’s tech businesses produce £9.9bn GVA 283,500The North is home to 5.2% GVA jobs 283,500 tech workers The digital economy accounts for 5.2% of the region’s economic output 18% of the nation’s 18 tech workers are % based in the North Sage UK, based in Newcastle, is one of the few Manchester tech companies is the UK’s in the FTSE 100 largest 82% tech cluster (by employee 1-in-20 of the North’s size) outside workforce is employed of London in the digital economy Why is the North’s digital economy significant? Employment Productivity Pay Digital workers in the North are paid on average 60% more than non-digital workers 10× 4× Median hourly digital wage vs. non-digital wage 28% 3.1% 11.3% 2.5% faster faster £15.00 Liverpool The North’s digital The North’s digital In the last 5 years, Productivity in £9.90 workforce grew by economy is creating the productivity of the the North’s digital 28% in the last jobs at 10 times the digital economy grew sector is growing 5 years, compared rate of the region’s by 11.3%. The figure 4 times faster than with 3.1% for the non-digital sectors was 2.5% for the productivity in £15.50 region’s non-digital non-digital economy the North’s non- Sheffield workforce digital sectors £10.00 The North is on Digital workers in £15.70 course to have the North are 53% 363k 363,000 digital 53% more productive Leeds workers workers by 2020 more than the region’s -
Foreclosing Futures: a Case Study of Urban Regeneration in Central Salford
Foreclosing Futures: A Case Study of Urban Regeneration in Central Salford Alexandra Catherine Black PhD University of York Sociology September 2015 Abstract This thesis provides an exploration of urban regeneration in the City of Salford, Greater Manchester. It is a detailed empirical case study drawing on interviews with regeneration policy makers in Salford to provide an understanding of the decisions that were taken and the results that emerged. In particular this thesis highlights the entrepreneurial forms of governance enacted by Salford City Council to acquire private investment and development opportunities, and explores the Council’s method of reducing its statutory requirements and democratic controls and increasing its financial risk-taking in order to secure these opportunities. Drawing on the post-political literature, this thesis questions the ‘no alternative’ discourse that accompanies these measures. This thesis also explores the wider changes to urban regeneration policy by the Coalition Government under conditions of economic austerity, considering the ways in which regeneration can be said to have moved from attempting to alleviate social problems via focused policies targeted at spaces of deprivation towards an urban policy based on delivering incentivised economic growth. It raises questions about the potential impact of this change for those places in Salford that continue to suffer from high levels of deprivation and are therefore less likely to secure financial investment under the new policy regime. This thesis contributes to the urban studies literature through a discussion of the concept of foreclosure. Principally the thesis considers how the re-envisioning and reordering of the City forecloses it as a space of engagement for those residents who are ‘out of place’ within this newly designed space. -
Contextualising Machine Gambling Characteristics by Location - Final Report a Spatial Investigation of Machines in Bookmakers Using Industry Data
Geofutures Contextualising machine gambling characteristics by location - final report A spatial investigation of machines in bookmakers using industry data Prepared by Geofutures for The Responsible Gambling Trust Authors: Gaynor Astbury & Mark Thurstain-Goodwin Geofutures Ltd 39 Powlett Road Bath BA2 6QL Commercial and in confidence Tel: 01225 471818 February 2015 www.geofutures.com Contents Executive summary……………………………………………………………………….. 2 1. Project background……………………………………………………………………. 4 1.1 Project details, aims and objectives…………………………………………………………………………… 4 2. The geographic modelling approach…………………………………………….. 7 2.1 Datasets………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 7 2.2 Modelling techniques………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 8 2.3 Error margins………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 13 3. What are the patterns of machine locations?..................................... 15 3.1 LBO growth in Great Britain………………………………………………………………………………………… 15 3.2 LBOs by operator………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 16 3.3 LBOs in relation to residents……………………………………………………………………………………….. 19 3.4 LBOs in relation to economic centres………………………………………………………………………… 26 4. What are places with machines like?.................................................. 29 4.1 Age profile…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 29 4.2 Ethnicity………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 32 4.3 Deprivation…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 34 4.4 Economic activity………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 36 4.5 Crime events………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. -
AN EVALUATION of the FDS Revision 11 2 16
! AN EVALUATION OF SPORTRADAR’S FRAUD DETECTION SYSTEM by David Forrest Professor of Economics, University of Liverpool, UK and Ian G. McHale Professor of Sports Analytics, University of Salford, UK September, 2015 ! ! CONTENTS SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 1! 1! INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 2! 1.1! The purpose and scope of this Report .............................................................................................. 2! 1.2! Conceptual framework ..................................................................................................................... 3! 1.3! Criteria for assessing screening systems .......................................................................................... 6! 1.4! Structure of the Report ..................................................................................................................... 9! 2! THE QUALITY, SCOPE AND RELIABILITY OF THE DATA USED IN THE FDS .. 12! 2.1! Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 12! 2.2! Odds Data ....................................................................................................................................... 12! The scope of the data ..........................................................................................................................