DOCSLIB.ORG

513 Part 334—Danger Zone and Restricted Area Regulations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
513 Part 334—Danger Zone and Restricted Area Regulations Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD Pt. 334 must be finalized before any credits credits (e.g., stream credits to a wet- can be released. land bank) must be consistent with the (2) For in-lieu fee project sites, real terms of this part. estate instruments, management plans, (2) In-lieu fee program instruments. All or other long-term protection mecha- in-lieu fee program instruments ap- nisms used for site protection must be proved on or after July 9, 2008 must finalized before advance credits can be- meet the requirements of this part. In- come released credits. lieu fee programs operating under in- (u) Long-term management. (1) The struments approved prior to July 9, legal mechanisms and the party re- 2008 may continue to operate under sponsible for the long-term manage- those instruments for two years after ment and the protection of the mitiga- the effective date of this rule, after tion bank site must be documented in which time they must meet the re- the instrument or, in the case of um- quirements of this part, unless the dis- brella mitigation banking instruments trict engineer determines that cir- and in-lieu fee programs, the approved cumstances warrant an extension of up mitigation plans. The responsible party to three additional years. The district should make adequate provisions for engineer must consult with the IRT be- the operation, maintenance, and long- fore approving such extensions. Any re- term management of the compensatory visions made to the in-lieu fee program mitigation project site. The long-term instrument on or after July 9, 2008 management plan should include a de- must be consistent with the terms of scription of long-term management this part. Any approved project for needs and identify the funding mecha- which construction was completed nism that will be used to meet those under the terms of a previously ap- needs. proved instrument may continue to op- (2) The instrument may contain pro- erate indefinitely under those terms if visions for the sponsor to transfer long- the district engineer determines that term management responsibilities to a the project is providing appropriate land stewardship entity, such as a pub- mitigation substantially consistent lic agency, non-governmental organiza- with the terms of this part. tion, or private land manager. (3) The instrument or approved miti- PART 334—DANGER ZONE AND gation plan must address the financial RESTRICTED AREA REGULATIONS arrangements and timing of any nec- essary transfer of long-term manage- Sec. ment funds to the steward. 334.1 Purpose. (4) Where needed, the acquisition and 334.2 Definitions. protection of water rights should be se- 334.3 Special policies. cured and documented in the instru- 334.4 Establishment and amendment proce- dures. ment or, in the case of umbrella miti- 334.5 Disestablishment of a danger zone. gation banking instruments and in-lieu 334.6 Datum. fee programs, the approved mitigation 334.10 Gulf of Maine off Seal Island, Maine; site plan. naval aircraft bombing target area. (v) Grandfathering of existing instru- 334.20 Gulf of Maine off Cape Small, Maine; ments—(1) Mitigation banking instru- naval aircraft practice mining range ments. All mitigation banking instru- area. ments approved on or after July 9, 2008 334.30 Gulf of Maine off Pemaquid Point, Maine; naval sonobuoy test area. must meet the requirements of this 334.40 Atlantic Ocean in vicinity of Duck Is- part. Mitigation banks approved prior land, Maine, Isles of Shoals; naval air- to July 9, 2008 may continue to operate craft bombing target area. under the terms of their existing in- 334.45 Kennebec River, Bath Iron Works struments. However, any modification Shipyard, naval restricted area, Bath, to such a mitigation banking instru- Maine. ment on or after July 9, 2008, including 334.50 Piscataqua River at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery, Maine; re- authorization of additional sites under stricted areas. an umbrella mitigation banking instru- 334.60 Cape Cod Bay south of Wellfleet Har- ment, expansion of an existing site, or bor, Mass.; naval aircraft bombing target addition of a different type of resource area. 513 VerDate Mar<15>2010 10:03 Sep 08, 2014 Jkt 232137 PO 00000 Frm 00523 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\232137.XXX 232137 pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with CFR Pt. 334 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–14 Edition) 334.70 Buzzards Bay, and adjacent waters, 334.260 York River, Va.; naval restricted Mass.; danger zones for naval operations. areas. 334.75 Thames River, Naval Submarine Base 334.270 York River adjacent to Cheatham New London, restricted area. Annex Depot, Naval Supply Center, Wil- 334.80 Narragansett Bay, RI; restricted area. liamsburg, Va.; restricted area. 334.81 Narragansett Bay, East Passage, 334.275 North and Southwest Branch, Back Coddington Cove, Naval Station New- River, Hampton, U.S. Air Force Base, port, naval restricted area, Newport, Langley, Va.; restricted area. Rhode Island. 334.280 James River between the entrance 334.82 Narragansett Bay, East Passage, to Skiffes Creek and Mulberry Point, Coasters Harbor Island, Naval Station Va.; army training and small craft test- Newport, Newport, Rhode Island, re- ing area. stricted area. 334.285 York River and the Naval Weapons 334.85 New York Harbor, adjacent to the Station Yorktown-Cheatham Annex, Stapleton Naval Station, Staten Island, Yorktown, Virginia; danger zone. New York; restricted area. 334.290 Elizabeth River, Southern Branch, 334.100 Atlantic Ocean off Cape May, N.J.; Va.; naval restricted areas. Coast Guard Rifle Range. 334.102 Sandy Hook Bay, Naval Weapons 334.293 Elizabeth River, Craney Island Re- Station EARLE, Piers and Terminal fueling Pier Restricted Area, Portsmouth Channel, restricted area, Middletown, VA; naval restricted area. New Jersey. 334.300 Hampton Roads and Willoughby 334.110 Delaware Bay off Cape Henlopen, Bay, Norfolk Naval Base, naval re- Del.; naval restricted area. stricted area, Norfolk, Virginia. 334.120 Delaware Bay off Milford Neck; 334.310 Chesapeake Bay, Lynnhaven Roads; naval aircraft bombing target area. navy amphibious training area. 334.130 Atlantic Ocean off Wallops Island 334.320 Chesapeake Bay entrance; naval re- and Chincoteague Inlet, Va.; danger zone. stricted area. 334.140 Chesapeake Bay; U.S. Army Proving 334.330 Atlantic Ocean and connecting Ground Reservation, Aberdeen, Md. waters in vicinity of Myrtle Island, Va.; 334.150 Severn River at Annapolis, Md.; ex- Air Force practice bombing, rocket fir- perimental test area, U.S. Navy Marine ing, and gunnery range. Engineering Laboratory. 334.340 Chesapeake Bay off Plumtree Island, 334.155 Severn River, Naval Station Annap- Hampton, Va.; Air Force precision test olis, Small Boat Basin, Annapolis, MD; area. naval restricted area. 334.350 Chesapeake Bay off Fort Monroe, 334.160 Severn River, at U.S. Naval Acad- Va.; firing range danger zone. emy Santee Basin, Annapolis, Md.; naval 334.360 Chesapeake Bay off Fort Monroe, restricted area. Virginia; restricted area, U.S. Naval Base 334.170 Chesapeake Bay, in the vicinity of and Naval Surface Weapon Center. Chesapeake Beach, Md.; firing range, 334.370 Chesapeake Bay, Lynnhaven Roads; Naval Research Laboratory. danger zones, U.S. Naval Amphibious 334.180 Patuxent River, Md.; restricted Base. areas, U.S. Naval Air Test Center, Patux- 334.380 Atlantic Ocean south of entrance to ent River, Md. Chesapeake Bay off Dam Neck, Virginia; 334.190 Chesapeake Bay, in vicinity of naval firing range. Bloodsworth Island, MD, U.S. Navy. 334.390 Atlantic Ocean south of entrance to 334.200 Chesapeake Bay, Point Lookout to Chesapeake Bay; firing range. Cedar Point; aerial and surface firing 334.400 Atlantic Ocean south of entrance to range and target area, U.S. Naval Air Chesapeake Bay off Camp Pendleton, Station, Patuxent River, Maryland, dan- Virginia; naval restricted area. ger zones. 334.210 Chesapeake Bay, in vicinity of Tan- 334.410 Albermarle Sound, Pamlico Sound, gier Island; naval guided missiles test op- and adjacent waters, N.C.; danger zones erations area. for naval aircraft operations. 334.220 Chesapeake Bay, south of Tangier Is- 334.412 Albemarle Sound, Pamilico Sound, land, Va.; naval firing range. Harvey Point and adjacent waters, NC; 334.230 Potomac River. restricted area. 334.235 Potomac River, Marine Corps Base 334.420 Pamlico Sound and adjacent waters, Quantico (MCB Quantico) in vicinity of N.C.; danger zones for Marine Corps oper- Marine Corps Air Facility (MCAF), re- ations. stricted area. 334.430 Neuse River and tributaries at Ma- 334.240 Potomac River, Mattawoman Creek rine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, and Chicamuxen Creek; U.S. Naval Pro- North Carolina; restricted area and dan- pellant Plant, Indian Head, Md. ger zone. 334.250 Gunston Cove, at Whitestone Point, 334.440 New River, N.C., and vicinity; Ma- Va.; U.S. Army restricted area. rine Corps firing ranges. 514 VerDate Mar<15>2010 10:03 Sep 08, 2014 Jkt 232137 PO 00000 Frm 00524 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\232137.XXX 232137 pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with CFR Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD Pt. 334 334.450 Cape Fear River and tributaries at and aircraft jettison, U.S. Air Force, Sunny Point Army Terminal, Brunswick MacDill Air Force Base. County, NC; restricted area. 334.635 Hillsborough Bay and waters contig- 334.460 Cooper River and tributaries at uous to MacDill Air Force Base, Fla.; re- Charleston, SC. stricted area. 334.470 Cooper River and Charleston Harbor, 334.640 Gulf of Mexico south of Apalachee S.C.; restricted areas. Bay, Fla.; Air Force rocket firing range. 334.475 Brickyard Creek and tributaries and 334.650 Gulf of Mexico, south of St. George the Broad River at Beaufort, SC. Island, Fla.; test firing range. 334.480 Archers Creek, Ribbon Creek, and 334.660 Gulf of Mexico and Apalachicola Bay Broad River; U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Overview of Historical Canadian Beaufort Sea Information Timco, GW
    NRC Publications Archive Archives des publications du CNRC Overview of Historical Canadian Beaufort Sea Information Timco, G. W.; Frederking, R. For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous. Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur: https://doi.org/10.4224/20178991 Technical Report; no. CHC-TR-057, 2009-02-01 NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC : https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=539b76cc-3e92-4ecd-8158-3357c9510fbd https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=539b76cc-3e92-4ecd-8158-3357c9510fbd Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB. Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at [email protected]. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information. Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Data Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2262
    Scientific Excellence • Resource Protection & Conservation • Benefits for Canadians Excellence scientifique • Protection et conservation des ressources • Bénéfices aux Canadiens DFO Lib ary MPO B bhotheque Ill 11 11 11 12022686 11 A Review of the Status and Harvests of Fish, Invertebrate, and Marine Mammal Stocks in the Nunavut Settlement Area D.B. Stewart Central and Arctic Region Department of Fisheries and Oceans Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N6 1994 Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2262 . 51( P_ .3 AS-5 -- I__2,7 Fisheries Pêches 1+1 1+1and Oceans et Océans CanaclUi ILIIM Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Manuscript reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which deals with national or regional problems. Distribu- tion is restricted to institutions or individuals located in particular regions of Canada. However, no restriction is placed on subject matter, and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, namely, fisheries and aquatic sciences. Manuscript reports may be cited as full-publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts and,indexed in the Department's annual index to scientific and technical publications. Numbers 1-900 in this series were issued as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Biological Board of Canada, and subsequent to 1937 when the name of the Board was changed by Act of Parliament, as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 901-1425 were issued as Manuscript Reports of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • PHA for Aberdeen Proving Ground , Aberdeen, Harford County, Maryland
    U.S. ARMY ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, ABERDEEN AREA U.S. ARMY APG, MICHAELSVILLE LANDFILL ABERDEEN, HARFORD COUNTY, MARYLAND EPA FACILITY ID: MD3210021355 JUNE 17, 2008 THE ATSDR PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT: A NOTE OF EXPLANATION This Public Health Assessment was prepared by ATSDR pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund) section 104 (i)(6) (42 U.S.C. 9604 (i)(6)), and in accordance with our implementing regulations (42 C.F.R. Part 90). In preparing this document, ATSDR has collected relevant health data, environmental data, and community health concerns from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), state and local health and environmental agencies, the community, and potentially responsible parties, where appropriate. In addition, this document has previously been provided to EPA and the affected states in an initial release, as required by CERCLA section 104 (i)(6)(H) for their information and review. The revised document was released for a 30-day public comment period. Subsequent to the public comment period, ATSDR addressed all public comments and revised or appended the document as appropriate. The public health assessment has now been reissued. This concludes the public health assessment process for this site, unless additional information is obtained by ATSDR which, in the agency’s opinion, indicates a need to revise or append the conclusions previously issued. Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry.................................................... Julie L. Gerberding, M.D., M.P.H., Administrator Howard Frumkin, M.D., Dr.P.H., Director Division of Health Assessment and Consultation…. .....................................................................William Cibulas, Jr., Ph.D., Director Sharon Williams-Fleetwood, Ph.D., Deputy Director Cooperative Agreement and Program Evaluation Branch ....................................................................Richard E.
    [Show full text]
  • LCSH Section U
    U-2 (Reconnaissance aircraft) (Not Subd Geog) U.S. 29 U.S. Bank Stadium (Minneapolis, Minn.) [TL686.L (Manufacture)] USE United States Highway 29 BT Stadiums—Minnesota [UG1242.R4 (Military aeronautics)] U.S. 30 U.S. Bicycle Route System (May Subd Geog) UF Lockheed U-2 (Airplane) USE United States Highway 30 UF USBRS (U.S. Bicycle Route System) BT Lockheed aircraft U.S. 31 BT Bicycle trails—United States Reconnaissance aircraft USE United States Highway 31 U.S.-Canada Border Region U-2 (Training plane) U.S. 40 USE Canadian-American Border Region USE Polikarpov U-2 (Training plane) USE United States Highway 40 U.S. Capitol (Washington, D.C.) U-2 Incident, 1960 U.S. 41 USE United States Capitol (Washington, D.C.) BT Military intelligence USE United States Highway 41 U.S. Capitol Complex (Washington, D.C.) Military reconnaissance U.S. 44 USE United States Capitol Complex (Washington, U-Bahn-Station Kröpcke (Hannover, Germany) USE United States Highway 44 D.C.) USE U-Bahnhof Kröpcke (Hannover, Germany) U.S. 50 U.S. Cleveland Post Office Building (Punta Gorda, Fla.) U-Bahnhof Kröpcke (Hannover, Germany) USE United States Highway 50 UF Cleveland Post Office Building (Punta Gorda, UF Kröpcke, U-Bahnhof (Hannover, Germany) U.S. 51 Fla.) Station Kröpcke (Hannover, Germany) USE United States Highway 51 BT Post office buildings—Florida U-Bahn-Station Kröpcke (Hannover, Germany) U.S. 52 U.S. Coast Guard Light Station (Jupiter Inlet, Fla.) BT Subway stations—Germany USE United States Highway 52 USE Jupiter Inlet Light (Fla.) U-Bahnhof Lohring (Bochum, Germany) U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Licenced Research Northwest Territories
    ' ·· I I I J 1 T J Index of Licenced Research II Northwest Territories • j '\I 1985 { J j Science Advisor J P.o. Box 1617 I Government of the Northwest Territories J ~ - I January 1986 Q 179.98 .C66 1985 copy2 I. -] INTRODUCTION l Scientific Research Licenses are mandatory for all research conducted in the N.W.T. There are three categories. Wildlife Research is licensed by the Department of Renewable Resources, J Archaeology is licensed by the Prince of Wales Northern Heritage Centre and all other research is licensed by the Science Advisor under the Scientists Act. A description of the procedures is J appended to the Index. l During the 1985 calendar year 260 li'cences to carry out scientific research were issued to scientists. Ninety-four 1985 licences were 1 issued to scientists directly affiliated with educational institutions. Of these 94 licences, 79 were issued to scientists from Canadian universities, 13 to scientists from U.S. universities, and 2 to scientists from other foreign universities. Of the 79 licences J granted to scientists from Canadian universities: Ontario received ............. 40 0 A1 berta received ..•..•.... , . 13 Quebec recetved . • . • . 9 Bri'tish Columbia received .... l Manitoba received ............ 5 J Newfoundland received ....•..• 3 J Saskatchewan received ..•..... 2 J The. i.ndex of 1 icenced research gi-ves the followi.ng information on each project: licence number, name and address of affi.liation of 1icen~ee. objective of the research and its location. I.t should be noted that i.nves ti,gators are ob'l i gated by the Ordinance to supply a report to the Commissi.oner withtn a stated ti"me.
    [Show full text]
  • Narwhal Surveys and Associated Marine Mammal Observations in Admiralty Inlet, Nav~ Board Inle!; .And Eclipse Sound, Baffin Islana
    Narwhal Surveys and Associated Marine Mammal Observations in Admiralty Inlet, Nav~ Board Inle!; .and Eclipse Sound, Baffin Islana, . N.W.T., During 1974 -1976 B. W. Fallis, W. E. Klenner and J. B. Kemper ~ Western Regio 'P\ H~", t Department otr heries ana~~ eans Winnipeg, Ma ' tob ~1A fR{£TI9~<N6 ~ ~;f/.,. , ~ ~.. "'Al BRAn, \\\~ • December 1983 --~ Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences No. 1211 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences These report s co ntain sc ientific and techni ca l inform ation that rep rese nts an import ant co ntribution to ex istin g knowledge but which for so me reason ma y not be appropriate for primary scientific (i .e. Journal) publication. Technical Reports are directed primarily towards a wo rldwide a udience and have a n international distribution. No restriction is placed on subject matter a nd the series reflects the broad interests and policies of the Depa rtment of Fis heri es a nd Oceans, namely, fisheries manage ment , tec hnol ogy and developm ent. ocea n sc iences, and aq uatic environments releva nt to Ca nada. Tec hnica l Report s ma y be cited as full publications. The co rrec t cita ti on a ppears above the a bstract of each report. Each report will be abstracted in Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts a nd will be ind exed annually in th e Depa rtment 's index to sc ientific and tec hni ca l publicatio ns. Numbers I -456 in thi s se ri es we re iss ued as Technical Reports of the Fisheries Resea rch Boa rd of Canad a.
    [Show full text]
  • Toponymie Esquimaude De La Région De Pond Inlet »
    Article « Toponymie esquimaude de la région de Pond Inlet » Guy Mary-Rousselières Cahiers de géographie du Québec, vol. 10, n° 20, 1966, p. 301-311. Pour citer cet article, utiliser l'information suivante : URI: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/020633ar DOI: 10.7202/020633ar Note : les règles d'écriture des références bibliographiques peuvent varier selon les différents domaines du savoir. Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d'auteur. L'utilisation des services d'Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d'utilisation que vous pouvez consulter à l'URI https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l'Université de Montréal, l'Université Laval et l'Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. Érudit offre des services d'édition numérique de documents scientifiques depuis 1998. Pour communiquer avec les responsables d'Érudit : [email protected] Document téléchargé le 10 février 2017 02:11 TOPONYMIE ESQUIMAUDE DE LA RÉGION DE POND INLET par Guy MARY-ROUSSELIÈRE, o.m.i. Pond Inlet Les Esquimaux de Pond Inlet, dits Tununermiut (sing. Tununermiutak), font partie de ce que Rasmussen a appelé le groupe des Esquimaux Iglulik, groupe qui comprend également les Tununerusermiut d'Admiralty Inlet, les Igluligmiut d'Iglulik et les Aiviligmiut de Repuise Bay. Ils sont également très proches par le langage et les coutumes des Akudnermiut de Clyde River. Comme la plupart des groupes esquimaux, les Tununermiut sont désignés du nom de leur pays, en l'occurrence Tununeq, qui s'applique plus particulièrement à une montagne de la côte sud-ouest de Milne Inlet, mais aussi par extension à toute la région située autour d'Eclipsé Sound.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text (PDF)
    Document generated on 10/02/2021 9:25 a.m. Cahiers de géographie du Québec Toponymie esquimaude de la région de Pond Inlet Guy Mary-Rousselières Volume 10, Number 20, 1966 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/020633ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/020633ar See table of contents Publisher(s) Département de géographie de l'Université Laval ISSN 0007-9766 (print) 1708-8968 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Mary-Rousselières, G. (1966). Toponymie esquimaude de la région de Pond Inlet. Cahiers de géographie du Québec, 10(20), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.7202/020633ar Tous droits réservés © Cahiers de géographie du Québec, 1966 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ TOPONYMIE ESQUIMAUDE DE LA RÉGION DE POND INLET par Guy MARY-ROUSSELIÈRE, o.m.i. Pond Inlet Les Esquimaux de Pond Inlet, dits Tununermiut (sing. Tununermiutak), font partie de ce que Rasmussen a appelé le groupe des Esquimaux Iglulik, groupe qui comprend également les Tununerusermiut d'Admiralty Inlet, les Igluligmiut d'Iglulik et les Aiviligmiut de Repuise Bay. Ils sont également très proches par le langage et les coutumes des Akudnermiut de Clyde River.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012-2013 Annual Report Annual 2012-2013 Mohawkcouncil
    MOHAWK COUNCIL OF AKWESASNE 2012-2013 Annual Report AKWESASNE 2012-2013 OF COUNCIL MOHAWK Mohawk Council of Akwesasne 2012-2013 Annual Report 2012-2013 Annual Report Overall Philosophy Tetewatén:ro tánon ska’nikón:ra kén hak Let us be partners and use one mind. Vision Statement Tetewaie:na* Honoring the past, facing today’s challenges, building a strong future. Mission Statement “The Mohawk Council engages in dialogue with Akwesasronon about Kionkwahteron:hon*. Mohawk Council enacts Boards, Commis- sions, Committees, Agencies and Departments to develop mandates, deliver services, protect Aboriginal rights and assert jurisdiction consistent with the strategic directions and Vision of Council.” *Tetewaie:na - The kanien’keha or Mohawk translation of tetewaie:na means “work together.” *Kionkwahteron:hon - The kanien’keha or Mohawk translation of kionkwahteron:hon means “we will be partners.” Table of Contents Ohen:ten Kariwatehkwen 1-2 Message from the Grand Chief 3 Message from the Executive Director 4 Mohawk Government Grand Chief and Council (2012-2015 Term) 5-25 Government Support 26-30 Executive Services Administration 31-36 Aboriginal Rights and Research Office 37-42 Communications Unit 43-44 Entewatatha:wi (Nation Building Process) 45-47 Iohahi:io 48-49 Core Services Human Resources 50-52 Informational Support 53-54 Operational Support 54-57 Department of Health Administration 58-60 Akwesasne Non-Insured Health Benefits 61-68 Akwesasne Mohawk Ambulance 69-70 Community Health 71-72 Iakhihsohtha 73-75 Long Term Care 76-77 Tsiionkwanonhso:te
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Information System: Geographic
    ASFIS-7 (Rev. 3) AQUATIC SCIENCES AND FISHERIES INFORMATION SYSTEM GEOGRAPHIC AUTHORITY LIST ASFIS REFERENCE SERIES, No. 7 Revision 3 ASFIS-7 (Rev. 3) AQUATIC SCIENCES AND FISHERIES INFORMATION SYSTEM GEOGRAPHIC AUTHORITY LIST edited by David S Moulder Plymouth Marine Laboratory Plymouth, United Kingdom revised by Ian Pettman and Hardy Schwamm Freshwater Biological Association Ambleside, Cumbria, United Kingdom Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2019 Required citation: FAO. 2019. Aquatic sciences and fisheries information system. Geographic authority list. ASFIS-7 (Rev. 3) Rome. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-131173-8 © FAO, 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode/legalcode).
    [Show full text]
  • Peri-Antarctic Islands
    PERI-ANTARCTIC ISLANDS R. K. Headland 8 January 2019 SPRI, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 1ER. <[email protected]> These are the 19 islands and archipelagos around Antarctica which are included in the area of interest of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research. The Peri-Antarctic Islands include the Sub-Antarctic ones and those farther south with associated features. The positions given are approximately the middle point for smaller islands and their limits for larger ones and groups. Names are given in the form recommended by the Union Géographique International. Sightings, landings, and winterings are, in all cases, the earliest definite dates; there may have been previous ones for some islands. The glacierized area is currently decreasing on several islands; thus proportions for some may be less than listed. Territorial sovereignty over some islands is disputed and some have changed by agreement. In easterly order, from the prime meridian, the islands are: BOUVETØYA; 54·42°S, 03·37°E One isolated volcanic island (with fumaroles) and offlier; in the Southern Ocean (the most isolated land on Earth). Area: 54 km2. Highest elevation: 778 m (Olavtoppen). 93% glacierized. Sighted 1739, first landing 1822 (by sealers). Uninhabited, no wintering population recorded. Norwegian dependency (Biland). PRINCE EDWARD ISLANDS; 46·60° to 46·97°S, 37·58° to 38·02°E Two islands (Marion Island and Prince Edward Island) with offliers, 19 km apart, of volcanic origin (Marion Island active in 1980); in the Indian Ocean. Area: 335 km2 (290 km2 and 45 km2 respectively). Highest elevation: 1231 m (Mascarin Peak, Marion Island).
    [Show full text]
  • Five Year Review Report for the Aberdeen Area, Dated September 2003”
    Five-Year Review Report for the Aberdeen Area, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland September 2003 Prepared by Directorate of Safety, Health, and Environment Environmental Conservation and Restoration Division Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 October 21,2003 Colonel Mardi U. Mark Commander, US Army Garrison (AMSSB-GCO) 2201 Aberdeen Boulevard Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21005-5001 RE: Five-Year Review for the Aberdeen Proving Ground - Aberdeen Area Dear Mr. Stachiw: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region III has reviewed the report entitled “Five Year Review Report for the Aberdeen Area, dated September 2003”. The report was prepared to address the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) Section 121 (c) Five Year Review requirements. EPA has reviewed this report and compared it to the OSWER Directive 9355.7-03B-P, Comprehensive Five Year Review Guidance (EPA, June 2001). The report generally meets the intent of EPA’s Five Year Review Guidance Document. EPA concurs conditionally with the Five Year review for the Aberdeen Proving Ground - Aberdeen Area NPL Site, assuming that all short term appropriate land use controls will be applied by the Army. The protectiveness of many of the remedies strongly depends on the proper application of land use controls. There is still an unresolved dispute between EPA and the Army regarding EPA’s post ROD authority as it applies to land use controls. Since there is not a final all-encompassing land use control document which obligates Aberdeen Proving Ground to enforce all needed and appropriate land use controls at this site, any protectiveness statement is dependent on the Army’s vigilance and application of appropriate controls.
    [Show full text]