Catastrophic Subglacial Drainage and Rapid Landscape Formation in Canada, with Special Emphasis on the Niagara Escarpment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 6 Print Reference: Pages 357-370 Article 31 2008 Catastrophic Subglacial Drainage and Rapid Landscape Formation in Canada, with Special Emphasis on the Niagara Escarpment Emil Silvestru Creation Ministries International Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Silvestru, Emil (2008) "Catastrophic Subglacial Drainage and Rapid Landscape Formation in Canada, with Special Emphasis on the Niagara Escarpment," The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism: Vol. 6 , Article 31. Available at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings/vol6/iss1/31 In A. A. Snelling (Ed.) (2008). Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Creationism (pp. 357–370). Pittsburgh, PA: Creation Science Fellowship and Dallas, TX: Institute for Creation Research. Catastrophic Subglacial Drainage and Rapid Landscape Formation in Canada, with Special Emphasis on the Niagara Escarpment Emil Silvestru, Ph.D., Creation Ministries International, 5–420 Erb St. W, Suite 213, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 6K6, Canada Abstract The concept of subglacial sheetfloods has gained momentum in recent years and some authors have explained certain features of the Niagara Escarpment as caused by such events. However, this author found enough evidence in the field that the entire Niagara Escarpment was created by such floods. The geographic distribution and the individual characteristics of potholes as well as similarities between subglacial flow conditions and karst drainages strongly argue for a set of events linked in a close sequence that are responsible for the catastrophic genesis of the Niagara Escarpment. Meltwater accumulation under the Laurentide Ice Sheet coupled with englacial pseudokarst has resulted in at least two episodes of subglacial sheetfloods and the rapid disintegration of the ice sheet. As large chunks of the ice sheet were ripped away from the main body and resettled as separate “islands,” flow and erosional patterns consistent with present-day glacial sediments formed. For the young earth creationist geoscientist such a scenario does not only provide valid arguments for rapidly forming geomorphology in the Late Quaternary but also provides valuable insights to the mechanics of flood erosion. Keywords Niagara escarpment, Subglacial sheetfloods, Subglacial erosion, Catastrophic, Englacial karst, Canada. Introduction of the Ordovician-Silurian sedimentary suite that The Michigan Basin and the Niagara Escarpment constitutes the bedrock in this area. The Silurian represent major components of North American dolostone overlies softer terrigenous sediments. geology and geomorphology. Charles Lyell’s visit in The width of the cuesta proper, that is, the segment the area in 1841 and his re-writing of the geologic behind the cliffs in which the escarpment lithology time frame by use of the Niagara Falls and gorge as is exposed, reaches its maximum width (a couple of a time marker gave Niagara Escarpment a major role kilometers) in the Bruce Peninsula. Nevertheless, in the history of modern geology. In his book Guide to the Geology of the Niagara Escarpment, the late Dr. Walter M. Tovell (1992, p. 3573) wrote: “Time was to Charles Lyell what gravity was to Isaac Newton, or MINNEAPOLIS DNA was to Watson and Crick.” Niagara Escarpment is essentially a rather ONTARIO NESC strange, half-circular cuesta (a sinuous ridge with a MICHIGAN gentle slope on one side and a cliff—escarpment—on the other), extending from northern New York State, WISCONSIN NESC Michigan through most of Southern Ontario, Bruce Peninsula, Basin Manitoulin Island, back south through Michigan (on NESC MICHIGAN the western shores of Lake Michigan) into Wisconsin. NEW YORK The total length of the Niagara Escarpment is well INDIANA PENNSYLVANIA in excess of 700 km. The escarpment proper is far ILLINOIS INDIANA OHIO from being continuous, often times the cliffs totally Figure 1. General map of The Niagara Escarpment disappear under thick glacial deposits or are eroded and Michigan Basin. Retrieved from http://commons. away along perpendicular valleys (Figure 1). The wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:November_gale.png with cliffs are formed by the carbonate (dolostone) sequence additions. 358 E. Silvestru most of the time the Niagara Escarpment stands otherwise available on a large (subcontinental) scale, as a well defined irregularity inside a rather dull, and these subglacial floods can therefore be seen as rolling-hill type of landscape that characterizes most excellent laboratories for diluvial geomorphology. of southern Ontario and northern Michigan, with its On the other hand, such a scenario tackles head- most spectacular segment along the eastern side of on the uniformitarian assumptions of the old-age the Bruce Peninsula, creating the scenic cliffs that interpretation of the Niagara Escarpment, and by overlook the Georgian Bay. extension, the whole two million year Quaternary It is difficult to select from the vast literature timeframe evolutionary geology has built based on published on the Niagara Escarpment as this those assumptions. landmark is one of the most studied North American geological sites and almost mandatory field trip for Previous Studies many geologists. For the Canadian ones, Tovell’s book Ever since the emergence of glaciology, subglacial is probably the ultimate reference, including some of erosion has been perceived as mostly the result of the first research on the Niagara Escarpment like the mechanical interaction between ice and the rock Dow (1921); Hennepin (1698); Kindle and Taylor substrate (plucking and abrasion). This was most (1913); Levrett and Taylor (1915); Lyell (1845) . likely due to alpine glaciers (generally cold-based) Subglacial floods on larger scale have entered the being for a long time the only “live object of study”. scientific literature relatively recently (probably early Moving subglacial water, although quite a visible 1980s), but not until the work of Shaw (1983, 1988, element in some alpine settings, has been assigned 1989, 1994, 1996, 2002; Shaw & Kvill, 1984; Shaw & little importance. Even recent major textbooks Sharpe, 1987; Shaw & Gilbert, 1990; Shaw, Faragini, consider the bulk subglacial erosion as the result of Kvill, & Rains, 2000) have they been considered as plucking and ablation (Miller, 2002). major erosional agents. Shaw’s research itself began In 1979, Cox tried to link drumlin and other glacial mostly as an alternative explanation to subglacial features to a diluvial origin, rather than ice transport bedforms, especially drumlins. As his studies (Cox, 1979). He had also suggested that potholes on extended, so did the areas that showed signs of the Niagara Escarpment had a diluvial origin. Shaw subglacial erosion in North America until a regional, and others (Shaw, 1983, 1988, 1989, 1996; Shaw & even sub-continental scale became noticeable. Kvill, 1984; Shaw & Sharpe, 1987) have gradually Gigantic amounts of meltwater have been postulated built up evidence that drumlins (Shaw, Kvill, & as accumulating beneath the Laurentide Ice Rains, 1989) are the result of sediments accumulating Sheet, being periodically released through massive by water transport inside negative (melt-generated) flooding events. Much of the areal—as opposed to forms on the bottom of the glacier/ice sheet. Shaw also channelized—erosional effects are believed to have explained many of the linear and crescentic scourings occurred underneath the ice. Thus, mysterious large- of the bedrock as meltwater erosional features. It is scale meandering features in the middle of flat areas worth mentioning that, in a most unusual gesture, became explainable. Shaw has fully acknowledged Cox’s priority in The Niagara Escarpment has been used as a proposing an erosional origin of drumlins, and that counter argument for a young-earth, biblical time he discovered Cox’s model in the Creation Research frame, ever since Lyell (1873) “calculated” a 35,000- Society Quarterly through an internet search. It year age of the Niagara Gorge and falls. Though is very rare to find creationist research positively catastrophic erosion by sudden drainage of proglacial referenced in secular journals (Shaw, 2002)! Lake Agassiz is a valid scientific explanation, no sign Except for Shaw, all the above refer to meltwater of it is found in any of the tourist signs that so much accumulated in lakes at the edge of the melting ice shape the mind of visitors, and very few textbooks sheets. Shaw has proposed subglacial meltwater even mention Lake Agassiz. It seems like most of the floods which would basically imply under-pressure emphasis regarding this Late Pleistocene episode is flow (similar in a way to conduit flow) discharging on its northerly subglacial release into Hudson Bay massive under-ice reservoirs.